17
School breaktimes: Opportunities for promoting health enhancing diet and physical activity Flo Harrison University of East Anglia, School of Environmental Sciences UKCRC Centre for Diet and Physical Activity, Institute for Public Health, Cambridge 24 th January 2012

School breaktimes: Opportunities for promoting health enhancing diet and physical activity Flo Harrison University of East Anglia, School of Environmental

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

School breaktimes: Opportunities for promoting health enhancing diet and physical activity

Flo HarrisonUniversity of East Anglia, School of Environmental Sciences

UKCRC Centre for Diet and Physical Activity, Institute for Public Health, Cambridge24th January 2012

Why schools?

Schools are important settings for health promotion

Children are there a lot

Schools are already designed to shape knowledge and behaviour through education

The provide space and facilities for food and drink consumption and physical activity.

Why breaktimes?

Key opportunity for free play within school hours

The main time during which children interact with the school food environment

Analysis 1

Food and drink consumption at school lunchtime: the impact of lunch type and contribution to overall intake in British 9–10-year-old children

Flo Harrison*1, Amy Jennings2, Andy Jones*1, Ailsa Welch2, Esther van Sluijs*3, Simon Griffin*3 and Aedín Cassidy2

•UKCRC Centre for Diet and Physical Activity, Institute for Public Health, Cambridge

1 School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7JT, UK 2 Department of Nutrition, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

3 Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK

In Press Public Health Nutrition (2012) doi:10.1017/S1368980011002321

Food and drink consumption at school lunchtime

Research questions

How does lunchtime consumption differ between those eating packed

lunches and those having school meals?

Is there evidence of a school influence on lunchtime intake?

How do any differences in school lunchtime intake impact overall

intake?

23.0

2.8

2.5

20.3

3.0

46.5

47.6

20.3

69.6

6.1

11.0

10.4

82.7

1.9

46.9

20.9

51.0

71.9

100 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 100

Chips *

Confectionary *

Savoury snacks *

Squash *

Fizzy drinks

Fruit juice

Vegetables *

Fruit *

Fruit & vegetables

mean intake (g)

Packed lunches School meals

Adjusted mean intake at lunchtime on school days

Food and drink consumption at school lunchtimeExplanatory line if required.

Results II

Secondary text

Bullet

Bullet

37.7

17.7

10.2

150.1

83.8

139.9

112.0

90.3

202.3

30.3

21.5

14.0

191.0

81.1

134.1

96.7

100.2

196.9

-250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250

Chips *

Confectionary *

Savoury snacks *

Squash *

Fizzy Drink

Fruit Juice

Vegetables *

Fruit *

Fruit & Vegetables

mean intake (g) <- Packed lunches School meals ->

Adjusted mean intake over whole day

Food and drink consumption at school lunchtimeExplanatory line if required.

Results II

Secondary text

Bullet

Bullet

61.1%

15.8%

24.4%

13.5%

3.6%

33.2%

42.5%

22.5%

34.4%

-250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250

Chips *

Confectionary *

Savoury snacks *

Squash *

Fizzy Drink

Fruit Juice

Vegetables *

Fruit *

Fruit & Vegetables

mean intake (g) <- Packed lunches School meals ->

Mean intake at lunchtime on school days as % of intake over whole day

20.2%

51.0%

74.4%

43.3%

2.3%

35.0%

21.6%

50.9%

36.5%

Food and drink consumption at school lunchtime

Conclusions and policy implications

Difference in intake between school meal and packed lunch eaters

School meal intake is in line with standards

For specific food groups school lunch consumption is important

Analysis 2

The impact of rainfall and school break time policies on physical activity in 9-10 year old British children: a repeated measures study

Flo Harrison*1, Andrew P Jones1, Graham Bentham1, Esther MF van Sluijs2, Aedín Cassidy3 and Simon J Griffin2

* UKCRC Centre for Diet and Physical Activity, Institute for Public Health, Cambridge1 School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7JT, UK. 2 Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK3 School of Medicine, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7JT, UK

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2011, 8:47

The impact of rainfall and school policies on physical activity

Research Questions

What is the relationship between physical activity and rainfall?

Can school policies moderate the relationship between physical activity and rainfall?

12

13

14

15

16

17

0 0.1-0.3 0.4-3.3 3.4+

Minutes MVPA over school lunchbreak

The impact of rainfall and school policies on physical activityResults

Total daily rainfall (7am-9pm)

0 0.1-0.3 0.4-3.3 3.4+

Minutes MVPA over whole day

Results I

The impact of rainfall and school policies on physical activity

School wet break policyNumber of

schools

Allowed out 11

Kept indoors - Indoor PA allowed 7

Kept indoors - No indoor PA allowed 72

Lunchtime MVPA by rainfall and school policy

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

min

ute

s M

VP

A

Kept in - PA

Kept in - no PA

Allowed out

0 0.1-0.3 0.4-3.3 3.4+

Total daily rainfall (7am-9pm)

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95Whole day MVPA by rainfall and school policy

Kept in - PA

Kept in - no PA

Allowed out

0 0.1-0.3 0.4-3.3 3.4+

Total daily rainfall (7am-9pm)

The impact of rainfall and school policies on physical activity

Conclusions

The relationship between rainfall and physical activity is moderated by school policy

Children allowed to play outdoors in wet weather are less active than those who can be active indoors

By allowing children to be physically active indoors in wet weather, schools may help children maintain activity levels.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This work was undertaken by the Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence.

Funding from the British Heart Foundation, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, the National Institute for Health Research, and the Wellcome Trust, under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration, is gratefully acknowledged.