Upload
wale-akanbi
View
229
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
1/32
Computer Systems
Performance Evaluation
CSCI 8710
KraemerFall 2008
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
2/32
Course Content
This four-hour course address computer systems performanceanalysis. It introduces the main concepts and techniques neededto plan the capacity of computer systems, predict their futureperformance under different configurations, and design newapplications that meet performance requirements. The course is
mainly based on the use of analytic queuing network models ofcomputer systems. These techniques are applied to study theperformance of centralized, distributed, parallel, client/serversystems, Web server and e-commerce site performance. Thecourse provides the students with hands-on experience inperformance evaluation through a project. The concept andapplications of software performance engineering are alsocovered.
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
3/32
Course Web Site
http://www.cs.uga.edu/~eileen/8710/
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
4/32
Grading Scheme
Your grade in this course will be calculated as the average of thefollowing: Homeworks -- 10% (A selected subset of the homeworks will be
graded. )
Quizzes -- 5% (One per paper presented.)
Paper presentation -- 10% Midterm Exam -- 25%
Final Exam -- 30%
Course project -- 20%
Letter Grades assigned as follows:
90
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
5/32
Late Policy
Paper presentations must be ready on the scheduled date. Latesubmissions of projects and homeworks will be accepted with apenalty computed as follows: score = Max_Score *Percentage_Score * (0.90)^(days_late).
A day is a 24 hour period, rounded up to the nearest day.
For example: You turn your project in 3 days late, and received a 95% score
based on the work done. Your recorded score will be:
score = 100 * (0.95) * (0.90)^3
score = 100 * (0.95) * (0.729)
score = 69 Exception
In the case that a solution is distributed, no project submissionswill will be accepted after distribution of the solution
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
6/32
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
7/32
Textbook
Performance by Design:
Computer Capacity Planning
by Example,
by Daniel A. Menasce, Virgilio A.F.Almeida, and Lawrence W. Dowdy
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
8/32
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
9/32
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
10/32
QoS Metrics
Response time
Throughput
Availability
Reliability
Security
Scalability Extensibility
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
11/32
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
12/32
Throughput
Measured in units of work completed over
time. Its a rate.
I/Os/sec
Page downloads/sec
HTTP requests/sec
Jobs/sec
Transactions per second (tps)
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
13/32
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
14/32
Throughput example
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
15/32
Availability
Fraction of time a system is available
(i.e.,operational).
Service interruptions can damage the reputation
of a company, may endanger lives, and maycause financial disasters.
A system with 99.99% availability over 30 days is
unavailable (1-0.9999) x 30 x 24 x 60 = 4.32
minutes.
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
16/32
Availability Problems
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
17/32
Admission Control
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
18/32
Admission Control
Improved response time
Decreased availability
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
19/32
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
20/32
Extensibility
Property of a system to constantly evolve to
meet functional and performance
requirements.
Autonomic computing, self-managing systems,self-healing systems.
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
21/32
Computer System Lifecycle
Functional requirements: what the system has to do and on what typeof platforms.
Non-functional requirements: how well the system has to accomplish
its functions. Service Level Agreements (SLA) are established.
In many cases, non-functional requirements have been neglected or
considered only at system test time!
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
22/32
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
23/32
Computer System Lifecycle
Components are implemented.- some are new
- some are re-used
- some are adapted
Components are interconnected to form a system
Components should be instrumented as they are built
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
24/32
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
25/32
Computer System Lifecycle
Configuration parameters have to be set in order to meet the SLAs. e.g., TCP parameters, database poolsize, maximum number of
threads, etc.
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
26/32
Computer System Lifecycle
Constant monitoring to check if the system is meeting demands: workload (peak periods, unusual patterns)
external metrics (user-perceived)
internal metrics (help to detect bottlenecks and to fine tune the system)
availability (external and internal)
May need to dynamically adjust configuration parameters
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
27/32
Computer System Lifecycle
Systems may need to evolve to cope with new laws and Regulations(e.g., HIPPA)
Systems may need to evolve to provide new functions (e.g., sale of
downloadable MP3 music in addition to CDs)
How are the IT resources going to cope with evolution in terms ofSLAs?
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
28/32
Reference Model for IT
Business Model:- number of branches
- number and location of ATMs
- number of accounts of each type
-business evolution plans (e.g., mergers)
Social Model- privacy policy
- accessibility policy
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
29/32
User Model:
Customer Behavior Model Graph
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
30/32
IT Infrastructure: Example
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
31/32
Homework #1
Page 30, #1 and #2 try them, if you can
Page 30, #3 and #4 write them up
7/28/2019 Scheduling in CPU
32/32
Tomorrow
Paper presentation session 1
scheduling, selection of papers, discussion of best
practices