Schedule of Proposed changes - Nottingham · Intro and Section 1 Officers Text will be updated when it comes to adoption. At this point (submission) the text is to be removed. Updated

Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough and Nottingham City - Schedule of Proposed

Changes and Modifications to the Aligned Core Strategies Publication Version

June 2013

CD/REG/02 Schedule of Proposed Changes and

Modifications to the Aligned Core Strategies Publication Version

This page is intentionally blank

Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

1

Introduction

The following schedule details all proposed changes to the Greater Nottingham Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough & Nottingham City Aligned Core Strategies since the publication in June 2012. • Those proposed changes that are purely typographical/grammatical

corrections, updating of dates and status of documents or are making changes to the text to clarifying meaning without changing the context are set out in dark grey type.

• Those changes which are more significant or are responding to comments from consultees are shown in bold .

• For clarification, where text has been changed, deleted text is shown as struck through and additional text shown underlined.

The changes which were as a result of the Government announcement on the preferred route for HS2 and the insertion of a proposed site at Toton have been subject to consultation in Broxtowe between 18 February and 3 April 2013. These changes are prefixed with the number M in the ref column, while all other changes that are proposed to the document are prefixed with the letter C in the ref column and have not yet been consulted upon. Further consultation will be undertaken on these changes and any others which are a result of the examination after the hearing sessions.


2

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C1 Guide to this

document Intro and Section 1

Officers Text will be updated when it comes to adoption. At this point (submission) the text is to be removed.

Updated information

C2 1.1.1 Intro and Section 1

Consultee Change text at para 1.1.1: "… the next 15 years between 2011 and 2028 "

In response to consultee comments


Officers Text amended to read "Previously, 5 authorities had been working to pro duce Aligned Core Strategies. However, following the election of the coalition government and their decision to abolish Regional Strategies, including the East Midlands Regional Plan, all the authorities have re-examined how they will meet their housing requirements and progress t heir Local Development Frameworks."

RS being revoked


Officers Text amended to read "Broxtowe, Erewash, Gedling and Nottingham City Cou ncils have reviewed the evidence for the area’s objective asse ssment of housing needs, including full consideration of the Governme nt’s 2008-based Household Projections. As a result of this exercise, the Councils have concluded that the housing provision, as proposed t hrough the Regional Plan, is supported by available evidence, and remains the appropriate level of housing provision to plan for in the plan area . Broxtowe, Gedling and Nottingham City have therefor e prepared this new aligned and consistent planning strategy for th eir part of Greater Nottingham which is referred to throughout this doc ument as the plan area, and is shown on Map 1.1. Although Erewash Borough Council was is unable to publish its Core Strategy at the same ti me as the other Councils and has therefore as a result is proposing to published a separate Core Strategy slightly later in the summer , the methodology and outcome of the review of the evidence for the a rea’s objective assessment of housing needs is shared ."

RS being revoked


3

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C5 1.1.6 Intro and

Section 1 Officers Replace para 1.1.6 with the following new para

"Broxtowe, Gedling and Nottingham City Councils wil l outline their approaches to the more detailed delivery of the Ali gned Core Strategies in subsequent Development Plan Documents As well as issues of strategic importance covering the whole plan area, the three Council areas making up the Aligned Core Strategies each has its own local issues and priorities (see sections 2 .7 to 2.9). The policies of the Aligned Core Strategies have therefore been written in such a way as to address the strategic common issues, and prov ide a sufficiently flexible framework for subsequent Development Plan Documents, in which Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough and Notting ham City Councils will outline their locally distinct approa ches to the more detailed delivery of the Aligned Core Strategies. "

Clarification


Officers Add in missing word in 2nd sentence – "a key aim ...” Legibility


Officers Text amended to read "The preparation of the Aligned Core Strategies have taken into account the Government’s East Midlands Regional Plan (2009) , which was is the Regional Strategy (RS). However, on the 6th July 2 010 the Secretary of State announced the revocation of Regional Strategi es. On the 20th March 2013 the Secretary of State laid in Parliamen t a statutory instrument to revoke the Regional Strategy for the East Midlands. This came into force on 12th April 2013 as such the East Midlands Regional Plan no longer forms part of the Development Plan. However, it is Although Regional Spatial Strategies are in the pro cess of being abolished it is the Councils’ view that much of the evidence base on which they East Midlands Regional Plan relied rely is still relevant. "

RS being revoked


4

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C8 1.1.13 Intro and

Section 1 Officers Text amended to read

"The Regional Plan covers the period to 2026, and s ets out the number of new homes which will have to be built in each Co uncil area, together with guidance on how to provide for new jobs and wo rk places, and a range of environmental matters. In addition, in March 2012 the government has published the National Planning Policy Framework which replaces Planning Policy Statements (PPSs); , Planning Policy Guidance notes (PPGs) and some circulars. These fa ctors have This has been taken into account in the development of the Aligned Core Strategies."

RS being revoked


Officers Delete "The” for the Greater Nottingham Retail Study Consistency


Officers Remove "Lowland Derbyshire Biodiversity Action Plan, 2011” Not considered relevant to the plan area, other Derbyshire references retained as still appropriate as have cross boundary issues


Officers In the last line delete "guidance” Under the new regs, DPDs are policy and SPDs are guidance

C12 1.3.4 & 1.3.8 Intro and Section 1

Consultee Amendments to para 1.3.8 "Waste and Minerals Development Plan Documents will be prepared by Nottingham City Council and Nottinghamshire County Counc il which will need to be in conformity with the Regional Str ategy (until it is abolished). ” And move following text from para 1.3.8 to after 1. 3.4 "t The Development Plan Documents produced by the Counc ils will form the ‘Statutory Development Plan’ for the area when all are completed.”

In response to consultee comments and result of the RS being revoked


5

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C13 1.3.8 (new ref) Intro and

Section 1 Officers Amendment to paragraph 1.3.9 by deleting e xisting text and replacing

with the following text "It is the go vernment’s intention to allow local communities to also create their own local Neighbourhood Plans setting out how they wish their local area to develop. Provided such a plan, where produced, is in line with the National Planning Policy Framework, w ith th e strategic vision for the wider area set by the local authorit y in the Local Plan (including development needs), and with other legal requirements, local people will be able to vote on it in a referendum. If the plan is approved by a majority of those who vote, then the policies it contains take precedence over existing non -strategic policies in the Local Plan for that neighbourhood. The government has introduced a system of neighbourhood plans which can be produced by parish and town councils and designated neighbourhood forums in are as without parish councils. Government has set out legislation and r egulations 1 on how Neighbourhood Plans must be prepared. Parish and t own Councils or neighbourhood forums may choose to prepare such pla ns but must take account of national planning policy and be in gener al conformity with the strategic policies in the Local Plan 2 including any development requirements. The Neighbourhood Plan is subject to independent scrutiny and provided it meets certain tests includ ing being in general conformity with strategic policies set out in the L ocal Plan, then it must be put to a local referendum to be decided by a maj ority vote. If the Neighbourhood Plan is adopted by the Council then i t becomes part of the development plan for the area that will provide the basis for making planning decisions. " and add the following footnotes " 1 Under the The Localism Act 2011 and the Neighbourh ood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 SI 2012 no. 637 " and " 2 Strategic policies include all the policies contai ned in the Aligned Core Strategies together with other strategic polic ies set out elsewhere in the Local Plan to be determined by the individua l Councils. "

Clarification


6

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C14 1.3.8 (new ref

1.3.9 & 1.3.13) Intro and Section 1

Consultee New section after neighbourhood planning paragraph “Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents Joint Waste Development Plan Documents are being pr epared by Nottingham City Council and Nottinghamshire County Council. The County Council is also preparing Minerals Developme nt Plan Documents for its geographic area including Broxtow e and Gedling. Coal reserves are present in Broxtowe west of Notti ngham City’s administrative boundary, and in the centre and nort h west of Broxtowe Borough. The City Council intends to deal with min erals matters for its area in its Land and Planning Policies Development Plan Document, which will include site allocations and development management policies. It is recognised that there are a number of matters surrounding minerals, and in particular coal, that will need to be addressed within the City Council’s Land and Planning Policies Developme nt Plan Document and these include: • The designation of Minerals Safeguarding Areas (M SAs) – MSAs will be defined on the Policies Map and relevant supporting policies will set out the Minerals Consultation Areas based upon these. Areas of surface coal have been identified in the west area of the City and these will be considered for safeguarding; • Prior extraction – there will be policy ensuring prior extraction takes place where feasible and viable; • Applications for new minerals workings – there wi ll be policy setting out the environmental criteria against which planning appli cations will be assessed; • Reclamation – policy will set out that worked lan d should be reclaimed at the earliest opportunity; • Former mining hazards – there will be policy sett ing out the need to address land instability arising from former minerals worki ngs and associated mining legacy / hazards, including collapse of shallow min e workings, collapse of mine entries, gas emissions from coal mines, transmissio n of gases into adjacent properties, coal mining subsidence and water emissi ons from coal mine workings; • Site allocations – all of the above issues will b e taken into consideration in the site assessment and site allocation process. This will include strategic sites



7

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason that have been identified in the Core Strategy, but will be allocated in the Land and Planning Policies Development Plan Document. Where surface coal resources or mining legacy issue s are present on the strategic sites included in this plan, they are ref erred to in Appendix A. Until the new policies in the Land and Planning Pol icies Development Plan Document are adopted, the City Council will continu e to rely upon the existing minerals policy in the adopted Local Plan (2005), a long with the guidance provided in the National Planning Policy Framework and extant Minerals Policy Guidance. Due to the built up nature of Nottingham City, it i s not proposed to make any provision for aggregates extraction across the plan period. Should proposals emerge, individual applications will be considered on their merits ."


Officers Reference to Options for Consultation in 2nd sentence should be “Options” Correction

C16 1.4 3 Intro and Section 1

Officers Text refers to Publication Draft policies, should be Publication Version Correction


Officers 5th line: remove surplus bracket before “(The”. Also amend date for when decision on designation on SPA is likely from "December 2012" to "Spring 2013"

Correction & updated information


Officers 8th line: “Nnitrogen” remove capital Consistency


Officers “Nnitrogen” remove the capital Consistency


Officers 6th line: Delete “to” Correction


Officers Amend 2nd line to read: “… it they meets...”

Correction


8

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C22 2.1.2 Section 2

(not V&O) Officers Amend text to read

"The most relevant guidance, policies and strategie s is included in the recently published Government planning policy is set out in the National Planning Policy Framework which was published in Ma rch 2012 and the East Midlands Regional Plan (which is the Regional Strategy) ."

RS being revoked

C23 2.1.3 Section 2 (not V&O)

Officers Amend text to read "The East Midlands Regional Plan (2009) included s a Sub-Regional Strategy for the Three Cities area (which covers th e Derby, Leicester and Nottingham areas). It provided s a strategic spatial development framework for the area. Although now abolished, th e evidence that supported it remains relevant. The government has given clear indication that all the Regional Strategies throughout England are to be abolished. However, although the government is in the process of abolishing the East Midlands Plan, it remains part of the development plan until abolished, and the evidence supporting i t will remain relev ant. "

RS being revoked


Officers Revised population figures inserted using Office for National Statistics 2011 Census, Crown Copyright to read "The three local authorities of Broxtowe, Gedling and Nottingham making up the plan area have a population of 531,700 528,700 (Greater Nottingham including the Hucknall part of Ashfield, Erewash and Rushcliffe, has a population of 786,900 784,100)..." - footnote amended as well

Updated information


9

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of


(not V&O) Officers Amend the text of the para to update population figures using Office for

National Statistics 2011 Census, Crown Copyright and other minor corrections to read "The main built up area of Nottingham (including Long Eaton in Erewash and West Bridgford in Rushcliffe), has a population of about 563,000 559,700 . There are two Sub Regional Centres within Greater Nottingham, Hucknall and Ilkeston, both important towns with their own identity and economic roles. Hucknall, with a population of 32,200 32,100, is in Ashfield District, but will extend into Gedling Borough once the proposed Sustainable Urban Extensions are implemented. Ilkeston is wholly within Erewash Borough and has a population of 38,100 38,600. ..."

Consistency


Officers Lower case for “(see Gglossary)” Consistency


Officers Revised employment figures inserted to read "Economic activity and employment rates in the plan area are relatively low – 71 72% of people of working-age are economically active and 64 65% in employment (73 74% and 66 68% respectively for Greater Nottingham), compared with 76% and 70% nationally..." and Footnote also updated

Updated information


Officers/Consultee Amend para 2.2.8 to read: "… such as Eastwood. There are a wealth of listed b uildings, conservation areas, scheduled ancient monuments and registered historic parks and gardens, which all contribute to its quality of life, local distinctiveness and sense to place . There are a range of heritage assets which reflect the history of the plan area f rom the medieval period through to the industrialisation of the Vict orian era. These have created a historic environment which has helped sha pe the area and contributed to the quality of life, local distincti veness and sense of place. These assets include a wealth of Listed Bui ldings, Conservation Areas, Scheduled Ancient Monuments, Registered Park s and Gardens along with other assets including those yet to be i dentified. Work is needed to protect, preserve and enhance them especi ally those which

Clarification


10

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason are deemed to be ‘at risk ’. …The area …"


Officers Add “a network of public libraries,” after “…Art Exchange galleries” Request made from City Library Services


Officers 3rd sentence, remove comma after “monuments,” Correction


Officers Revised population figures inserted to read "The population of the area rose by 43,500 42,500 (8.7% ), between 2001 and 2010 2011 (53,100 52,400 or 7.2% within Greater Nottingham) due to natural growth in the population, people living longer, international migration, and the growth in student numbers." and footnote updated

Updated information


Officers Change document title in footnote to “Forecast of Population and Households for Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire Authorities Controlled to New Dwelling Figures”

Correction

M33 2.2.11 Section 2 (not V&O)

Officers At the end of the paragraph add "In January 2013 the Secretary of State for Transpo rt announced that the preferred ‘Y’ route for High Speed Two rail network (HS2) will pass through the plan area with a hub station at Toton S idings to serve the East Midlands. This will significantly reduce journ ey times from the plan area to other areas including London and several Co re Cities, and will improve connections to stations in Europe via HS1. HS2 is expected to be operational by 2032, which although outside of t he plan period will encourage investment and job creation in the plan a rea during the plan period, bringing significant benefits in terms of s ustainable transport and economic development. "

Proposed HS2 route and station


11

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of


(not V&O) Officers Amend text to read

"... In particular, Nottingham City has a large proportion of smaller homes (37% having 4 rooms or fewer compared with 31% for the Pplan Aarea as a whole), and more social rented accommodation (33% compared to 24% for the Pplan Aarea as a whole). House price to income ratios are lower for the northwest of Greater Nottingham, but high for the south eastern part, giving rise to affordability problems"

Correction


Officers Amend text of the last sentence to “... an d some of the former council owned outer estates, which have a restricted range of house types and sizes, such as Clifton.”

To clarify that reference to Clifton is in terms of housing type, not households.


Consultee Amend justification text of Para 2.2.21 t o read: "... ,whereas for men in Nottingham it is 3 years l ess than the national figure (78.2 years at birth). Arboretum ward in Not tingham City has male life expectancy more than 8 years below the nationa l average14. These lower life expectancy figures reflect factors such a s the numbers of overweight and obese adults, and the numbers of dea ths caused by circulatory diseases . However, there are parts of the plan area, particularly Nottingham City where there are signif icant gaps in life expectancy between the most and least deprived comm unities, ranging in some cases up to ten years. Deprivation also mea ns that, on average, life expectancy in Nottingham is three years less t han in England (which is 78.2 years at birth). The causes of that lower l ife expectancy are due in the main to a higher than average prevalence of three diseases; cardiovascular heart disease, cancer and chronic ob structive pulmonary disease (lung disease). Lifestyle risk factors cont ribute to all of these. Smoking, low levels of exercise, obesity, high alco hol consumption and poor mental wellbeing also contribute to ill health ."



Officers Amend text to read "An area to the north of the plan area has been identified as having the characteristics of a Special Protection Area (see glossary) for Wwoodlark and Nnightjars. This area is under consideration for formal inclusion in the

Correction


12

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason designation process."

C38 2.3.2 Vision & Objectives

Officers Amend text to read “and supported by a high quality high capacity digi tal infrastructure network. , but It also includes … ”

Add reference to the digital infrastructure required.


Officers Amend text to read “Much of this growth is sustainably accommodated within the existing main built up area of Nottingham which has assisted in reducing the need to travel, made the most of existing infrastructure and has driven the regeneration of parts of the urban area. The main built up area of Nottingham has been expanded, and new development is creating successful communities, well integrated into the urban area, and with excellent connectivity to the wider city, especially the City Centre and other job opportunities.”

Consistency with the use of the term “main built up area” in the 1st and 2nd sentence


Consultee 2.3.5 additional text … "These developments are responsible for raising the city’s position in the national retail rankings and have enhanced its role as the region’s principal shopping and leisure destination"



Officers Delete the comma after “gateway,” Correction


Consultee Amend paragraph 2.3.6 to read "The Sustainable Urban Extensions in Gedling adjoin ing the Sub Regional Centre of Hucknall (which is in Ashfield D istrict) are now successful neighbourhoods in their own right, but w ell integrated into Hucknall and have contributed to Hucknall 's the town's vibrant local economic and retail roles."



Officers Remove capital for “Ccities” Correction


13

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason M44 2.3.9 Vision &

Objectives Officers Add text after the first sentence

"A HS2 hub station to serve the East Midlands is ne aring completion at Toton in Broxtowe. Associated infrastructure includ ing convenient sustainable public transport access to link the sta tion to the rest of Greater Nottingham is complete or planned. Develop ment in the vicinity of the proposed HS2 station at Toton has maximised opportunities for the local community and the regional and national e conomy. "



Consultee Amend end of first sentence of para 2.3.1 0 to read "…, whilst the historic environment, both urban and rural is valued and protected and where necessary has been enhanced . …"

Clarification


Consultee Amend text at para 2.3.11 “… improvements to schools and aca demies , academies, further education establishments and universities now giving them…”


C47 Spatial objective ii

Vision & Objectives

Officers Amend text to read “The main built up area of Nottingham”

Consistency

M48 Spatial objective iii

Vision & Objectives

Officers add after the words ‘Nottingham Science Pa rk’ "… and development in the vicinity of the proposed HS2 hub station at Toton ."


C49 Spatial objective iv

Vision & Objectives

Consultee Amend Para 2.4.1iv to read "To create the conditions for the protection and en hancement of a balanced hierarchy and network of City, town and ot her centres, providing for retail, employment through economic growth and retail development. The provision of innovative and effic ient shopping, leisure, tourism and local services of a scale appr opriate to the centres position in the hierarchy will be promoted in addit ion to social and other appropriate uses, …"



14

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C50 Spatial

objective iv Vision & Objectives

Officers Amend text to read "… To facilitate the redevelopment of both the Broadmarsh and Victoria Shopping Centres within the City Centre and improvements to the vitality and viability of the town centres of Arnold and Beeston. Bulwell will see significant development and enhancement with its role changed from Ddistrict Ccentre to a Ttown Ccentre..."

Correction

C51 Spatial objective viii

Vision & Objectives

Consultee Amend spatial objectives: viii "…and by improving access to cultural, sport and leisure and lifelong learning activities."


C52 Spatial objective ix

Vision & Objectives

Consultee Amend spatial objective ix to read “…community, and leisure and sport facilities…”



Vision & Objectives

Consultee Objective 2.4.1 - ix amended to read “…new schools (eg at Top Wighay, north of Hucknall) and academies , academies, further education establishments and uni versities , and to meet…”



Vision & Objectives

Officers Add full stop at the end of the objective Correction

M55 Spatial objective x

Vision & Objectives

Officers Add at the end of the paragraph "Sustainable transport options linking the proposed HS2 hub station to the rest of Greater Nottingham will be explored inc luding a NET extension. "



Officers 2nd line: “their Core Strategies” rather than “its Core Strategy” Correction


Officers 1st line: Delete “of the” Correction


15

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of


(not V&O) Officers Population figure updated following census 2011 data release, text amended

to read: "Broxtowe has a population of 111,800 109,500 (mid 2010 estimate 2011 census) and …"

Updated information

M59 2.7.4a Section 2 (not V&O)

Officers Add new paragraph after 2.7.4 "The preferred location for a HS2 hub station at To ton will significantly improve the accessibility of the Borough to London and several Core Cities both in Britain and in mainland Europe. It w ill make the area attractive to inward investment, will lead to signi ficant job creation and will add to the sustainability of appropriate mixed use development in close proximity to the station. The details and m ix of uses will be determined through the Borough’s site specific Deve lopment Plan Document. "



Officers Remove the word “cut” on the last line as “Beeston Canal” is the correct name Correction


Officers 2nd line: Delete “visitor” Correction


Consultee Amend para to read "In the borough there are 144 Listed Buildings, 15 Conservation Areas, 7 Ancient Monuments, 10 SSSIs and 140 other Sites of Im portance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) 151 Listed Buildings (6 Grade I, 9 Grade II* and 136 Grade II), 6 Scheduled Ancient Monuments, 1 5 Conservation Areas, 10 SSSIs and 143 Sites of Importance to Natu re Conservation (SINCs) . However, some of these heritage assets ar e at risk, with 3 Listed Buildings, 1 Scheduled Ancient Monument and 4 Conservation Areas included on the national Heritage at Risk Reg ister ."



Officers 4th line, Add “Plan” after “Centre”. Correction


Officers Amend text to read "… Beeston Business Park in March 2012 and, being immediately adjacent to the train station, it is well placed to attract new enterprises."

Correction


16

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of


(not V&O) Officers Last line: Add “it” before “is” Correction


Officers Amend text to read "Average property prices in Broxtowe at just below £1504,000 (October-December 2012 September 2011) show a steep drop of approximately £15,000 from the same time in 2010 and are lower than the county averages for both Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire. ..."

Updated information


Officers Amend text to read "At the 20011 census 7.2 6.8% of the borough’s population was of ethnic origin with the largest BME groups being Indian and Chinese."

Updated information


Consultee Amend text Para 2.7.15 "… in particular high proportions of South East Asi an international students, as both…"



Officers 1st line of “The Environment” bullet: Comma rather than semi-colon after “place”?

Correction


Officers Updated population figure inserted, text amended to read "Gedling Borough is a mix of urban and rural with around 80% of 113, 200 113,500 residents living in the Greater Nottingham suburbs of Arnold and Carlton." Footnote also updated

Updated information


Officers 3rd sentence add “as” inserted before “designated MLAs” Correction


Officers Last sentence refers to SPA. Should reflect other references – decision to be made “… in 2012 in spring 2013 at the earliest”.

Correction


17

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of


(not V&O) Consultee & Officers

Amend last sentence in paragraph 2.8.4 to read "Newstead Abbey Park, once home to Lord Byron, incl udes a number of heritage assets such as the Grade I Listed Abbey an d Boundary Wall and is a major feature in the North of the Borough. There are 188 l Listed Buildings in the Borough (6 Grade I, 15 Grade II* a nd 167 Grade II), 9 Scheduled Ancient Monuments and 4 Registered Parks and Gardens. However some of these heritage assets are at risk, with 3 Listed Buildings (including Newstead Abbey) and 1 Schedule d Ancient Monument included on the national Heritage at Risk register ."



Officers Insert comma after “equivalent,” Correction


Officers Lower case for “Ttown Ccentre” for consistency Consistency


Officers Revised population figures inserted using Office for National Statistics 2011 Census, text amended to read "Nottingham City is one of the eight Core Cities in England. The City is a very compact and high-density urban area, with a population of 306,700 305,700 and an area of only 7,461 hectares. .." Footnote also amended

Updated information


Consultee Amend justification text at 2.9.7 to … "There are 8 Local Nature Reserves (LNR) totalling 140.1ha , 64 SINCs and 3 SSSIs in the City . “



18

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of


(not V&O) Officers Revised employment and population figures inserted and slight corrections,

text amended to read "Unemployment in the city was 14,677 13,595 (6.6 6.1%) in March October 2012, a rate which had increased sharply from the previous year increased in the past two years but declined steadily since the beginning of 2012. This compares poorly with 3.6 3.1% for the rest of the Pplan Aarea (Broxtowe & Gedling) . Between October 2010 and September 2011 July 2011 and June 2012 only 56.8 60% of 16-64 year old people living in the City were in employment. This figure is affected by the number of students, but, even allowing for this, it is low compared to 73.6 73.1% for the rest of the Pplan Aarea." Footnote also amended

Updated information


Consultee Amend justification text 2.9.13 to read: “…City Hospital, the Universities, Lenton Lane,”



Consultee Amend text of para 2.9.15 to “… including a large proportion of foreign international students and post graduates. …”


C81 Section A text Other Officers Lower case for “Ccity" "Ttown Ccentre” for consistency Consistency C82 Section A text Other Officers Insert text "A Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development" Correction


19

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C83 New Policy A Officers New policy and justificat ion text on the Presumption in favour of

sustainable development based on the model policy p roduced by the Planning Inspectorate. Policy and justification to read: "Policy A: Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Dev elopment 1. A positive approach will be taken when consideri ng development proposals reflecting the presumption in favour of s ustainable development contained in the National Planning Poli cy Framework. The relevant Council will always work proactively with applicants jointly to find solutions which mean that proposals can be app roved wherever possible, and to secure development that improves t he economic, social and environmental conditions in the area. 2. Planning applications that accord with the polic ies in the Local Plan (and, where relevant, with polices in Neighbourhood Plans) will be approved without delay, unless material considerati ons indicate otherwise. 3. Where there are no policies relevant to the appl ication, or relevant policies are out of date at the time of making the decision, then planning permission will be granted unless material consider ations indicate otherwise – taking into account whether: a) any adverse impacts of granting permission would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, when assessed a gainst the policies in the National Planning Policy Framework taken as a whole; or b) specific policies in that Framework indicate tha t development should be restricted. Justification text 3A.1.1 The Government’s National Planning Policy Fr amework recognises that sustainable development is about ch ange for the better. It is about positive growth, making economic, envir onmental and social progress for this and future generations. To achiev e sustainable development, economic, social and environmental gai ns should be sought jointly. They are mutually dependent.

In light of NPPF


20

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason 3A.1.2 In line with Government policy advice, the C ouncils have adopted a positive approach in seeking to meet the objectiv ely assessed development needs of the area. The policies in the Aligned Core Strategies provide a clear framework to guide devel opment that creates positive, sustainable economic growth, therefore fo llowing the presumption in favour of sustainable development, e nabling proposals that accord with the plan objectives to be approved without delay. This policy is therefore at the heart of decision taking when assessing planning applications. 3A.1.3 There may be instances where the plan is sil ent or in future years, policies become out of date. To enable the Councils to continue to take a sustainably positive approach to decision making, applicants will need to assist by submitting evidence to demonstrate how the benefits of a proposal outweighs any adverse impacts. In this way economic, social and environmental responsibilities can continue to be met without compromising the ability of future generations to m eet their own needs and well-being. "

C84 Policy 1.1 Policy 1 Consultee Amend text of Pol icy 1.1: Delete last sentence "The onus will be on developer s to justify robustly why full compliance with policy requirements is not viable or feasible ." And add “…energy use, unless it can be demonstrated that co mpliance with the policy is not viable or feasible. ”


C85 Policy 1.4 Policy 1 Officers Lower case for “Ccarbon Ddioxide” Consistency C86 Policy 1.6 Policy 1 Consultee Amend policy 1.6 to read:

"Development will be supported which adopts the pre cautionary principle, proposals that avoids areas of current and future flood risk, and which does not increase the risk of flooding elsewhere and, w here possible reduces flood risk, adopting the precautionary principle, will be supported ."


C87 Policy 1.8 Policy 1 Consultee Delete the words within the urban area in Policy 1.8 In response to consultee comments


21

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C88 Policy 1.8 Policy 1 Consultee Policy 1.8 Correc t typing error, add “be ” at 1.8 to read

"… the following factors will be taken into account…"


C89 Policy 1.8 and 1.9

Policy 1 Officers Use capitals for “eException tTest” to accord with term used in NPPF Consistency

C90 Policy 1.10 Policy 1 Consultee Amend text of Po licy 1.10 to read "All new development should incorporate measures to reduce surface water run-off whilst managing surface water drainag e in a sustainable manner and the implementation of Sustainable Drainage Sys tems should be incorporated into all new developments wil l be sought unless …"


C91 3.1.1 Policy 1 Officers Insert “and” between policy 10 and policy 11 Correction C92 3.1.6 Policy 1 Officers 9th line: Add comma after “groups,” Correction C93 3.1.6 Policy 1 Consultee Amend para 3.1.6

"…promote waste minimisation and recycling. There is evidence that climatic change will effect health globally and alt er the patterns of morbidity and mortality in the UK. Some groups…."


C94 3.1.7 Policy 1 Consultee Amend text in 3rd sen tence of Para 3.1.7 to read "… However, development of or affecting historic heritage assets, which …"


C95 3.1.9 Policy 1 Officers Put "Zero Carbon" in quote marks and add "(see glossary)", (glossary term for Zero Carbon also added) - see later in schedule.

Correction & clarification

C96 3.1.10 Policy 1 Officers Zero Carbon but in quote marks Correction C97 3.1.14 Policy 1 Consultee Amend first sentence of justification text 3.1.14 to read

"Some parts of the urban area are also prone to flo oding from surface water runoff, including steep sided sites where it is particularly important to manage surface water run off to reduce flood risk to others ."



22

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C98 3.1.14 Policy 1 Consultee Amend last sentence of justification text 3.1.14 to read

"…For development on brownfield sites, new developmen ts should aim to reduce the rate of runoff from the sites. As a minimum, f For development on greenfield sites, the aim should be to reduce or maintain surface water runoff where possible or maintain runoff levels compared to those present prior to development."


C99 Policy 1 Monitoring arrangements

Policy 1 Consultee Amend monitoring indicator to "Number of developments incorporating SuDS"



Policy 1 Officers Amend "SUDS" to "SuDS" in monitoring arrangements for consistency through the document and how the EA refer to these

Correction

C101 Policy 2.1 Policy 2 Officers/Consultee Amend text to read “… adjoining the main built up area of Nottingham”


C102 Policy 2.2c) i) Policy 2 In response to consultee comments

Amend text to read "Awsworth, Brinsley, Eastwood (including parts of G iltbrook and Newthorpe) and Kimberley (including parts of Nuthall and Watn all), in Broxtowe; …"


C103 Policy 2.3 Policy 2 Consultee Delete the word "phased and " In response to consultee comments

C104 Policy 2.3a) Policy 2 Officers Amend text to read “…adjoining the main built up area of Nottingham” Consistency of the use of the term


23

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C105 Policy 2.3 Policy 2 Officers Revised housing f igures from trajectories for sites (Broxtowe, Gedli ng &

City) Broxtowe figures amended to read "2011-2012 250 2013 to 2018 1,600 2018 to 2023 2,250 2,300 2023 to 2028 2,050 2,000 Gedling figures amended to read 2011-2012 500 550 2013 to 2018 2,000 2,200 2018 to 2023 2,850 2023 to 2028 1,900 1,650 Nottingham City figures amended to read 2011-2012 1,050 950 2013 to 2018 4,500 4,400 2018 to 2023 5,900 5,950 2023 to 2028 5,700 5,850"

Updated information

C106 Policy 2.3aiii) Policy 2 Officers Change housi ng figure to "up to 600". Updated information

C107 Policy 2.3 (b) i (NPL)

Policy 2 Consultee Change housing figure to "up to 600". In response to consultee comments

M108 Policy 2.3 Policy 2 Officers Add "iii) A strategic location for growth in the vicini ty of the proposed HS2 station at Toton, in Broxtowe with appropriate mix of development to be determined in the site specific Development Plan Do cument. " The remainder of the numbering to this section of t he policy would be amended to follow this.



24

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason M109 Policy 2.4 Policy 2 Officers Add new

"4b) Land in the vicinity of the proposed HS2 stati on at Toton in Broxtowe; " The remainder of the numbering to this section of t he policy would be amended to follow this.


C110 Policy 2.5 Policy 2 Consultee Amend text of Po licy 2.5 to read "Retail, health, social, leisure and cultural devel opment will be located in or on the edge of the City Centre, as set out in Policy 5 , and the Town Centres of Arnold and Beeston."


C111 Policy 2.5 Policy 2 Officers Lower case for “Ttown Ccentre” for consistency Consistency C112 Policy 2.6.a.ii Policy 2 Officers Add space between A52(T) and Clifton Correction C113 Policy 2.6b) Policy 2 Consultee Amendments to text to read

"b) Other schemes with no committed funding but which remain are also important to the delivery of the Core Strategy incl ude:..." "A52 Junction Improvements (in Rushcliffe Borough between A6200 Derby Road and Bingham );”


M114 Policy 2.6c) Policy 2 Officers Add new "6c) National and local schemes which will have sig nificant economic and sustainable transport benefits to the plan area if implemented include- i) High Speed Rail 2 (HS2) ii) HS2 hub station at Toton to serve the East Midl ands iii) Extension to NET to serve the new HS2 hub stat ion " The remainder of the numbering to this section of t he policy would be amended to follow this.



25

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C115 Policy 2.6c) Policy 2 Consultee Add bullet poi nt to Policy 2.6

“vi) Hucknall Town Centre Improvement Scheme (Ashfi eld District) ”


C116 Policy 2.6 a) and b)

Policy 2 Officers Amend numbering so that schemes in criteria a) and b) following same numbering (ie a i), ii) & iii) and b)

Consistency with other policy numbering formatting

C117 Policy 2 footnote

Policy 2 Consultee Delete second sentence after 'st rategic locations'. "Key Settlements are also ‘strategic locations’ and will deliver housing throughout the plan pe riod . "


C118 3.2.4 Policy 2 Officer Text amended to read "… The Council has resolved that where possible these will be prepared in the form of nNeighbourhood pPlans."

Consistency

C119 3.2.5 Policy 2 Officers 1st line: Reference should be to part 3(c) rather than 3(d). Correction C120 3.2.6 Policy 2 Consultee Amend Para 3.2.6

"…regeneration challenges present. It is phased Housing provision varies across the plan period on the basis of likely delivery timescales, taking into account infrastructure delivery and a r ecovering housing market. In addition, the housing level proposed ta kes account of what is considered to be…."


C121 3.2.6 Policy 2 Officers Amend text to read “…continuing in-migration to the area Greater Nottingham, albeit at a lower level…”.

Clarification

C122 New para 3.2.6a

Policy 2 Consultee New para 3.2.6a "New government Household Projections based on the 2011 Census are expected to be published in 2014, and by this time economic circumstances may have stabilised somewhat. Should the new Household Projections indicate that the Councils’ a ssumptions underpinning housing provision are no longer approp riate, the Core Strategies will be reviewed. "



26

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C123 3.2.7 Policy 2 Officers Amend text to read

"The housing provision for the plan area equates to that previously included in the East Midlands Regional Plan which remains p art of the Development Plan for the area It required the plan area to provide a minimum of 34,800 new homes between 2006 and 2026, as part of a Greater Nottingham minimum housing provision figure of 60,600. The Regional Plan figures have therefore been used as t he basis of extending the plan period to 2028, by adding two ye ars of provision to the 2026 figures and subtracting the completions be tween 2006 and 2011, to give the housing provision figure of 30,55 0 for 2011 to 2028 as illustrated in table 2.1. The evidence underlying this housing provision for the plan area has been reviewed, including full consideration of the Government’s 2008-based Household Projections, and it is considered to meet the full objectively assessed housing needs of the area. "

RS being revoked

C124 3.2.8 Policy 2 Officers Add a comma after “and,” Correction C125 3.2.8 Policy 2 Officers 5th/6th line: add “it” before “should”. Correction C126 New para

after 3.2.8a Policy 2 Consultee New paragraph 3.2.8a and footnot e

"Due to factors including the current economic down turn, the lead in time required to bring forward development on strat egic sites, and in some cases the requirement for infrastructure to be in place prior to development, the delivery of housing across the pla n period is expected to be lower in the early part of the plan period. Housing delivery will build up thereafter due to a return to more normal market conditions and the commencement and build out of the strategic sit es. This is reflected in the table included at Policy 2.3. The figures i n the table are not upper limits to development, they represent the anticipat ed rate of housing completions, and will be used by the councils to de termine the level of their 5 year supply of deliverable housing sites. (Each council’s anticipated housing completions for all the years o ver the plan period are set out in the ‘Plan – Annual Housing Target’ r ow of the housing trajectories in Appendix C). Whilst it is recognised that a more even level of h ousing delivery across the plan period would be preferable in terms of mat ching supply against identified need, there is clear evidence that the c urrent economic circumstances, slow housing delivery and suppressed demand for



27

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason housing justify the approach. (See Greater Notting ham Housing Market and Economic Prospects’ report, GL Hearn, 2012)." Add new footnote after penultimate sentence of firs t para above "The 5 year land supply will be calculated as follo ws: the anticipated housing delivery can be found by using the ‘Plan – Annual Housing Target’ for the appropriate period. Any shortfall (or overprovision) is taken into account by adding (or subtracting) propo rtionately from each remaining year of the trajectory. The relevant sup ply in each year making up the 5 year period is then added together. A 5% buffer can then be added to give the 5 year plus 5% housing fi gure for which each Council is required to ensure sufficient specific d evelopable sites are identified. An example of the calculation is contai ned in the Housing Background Paper Addendum, 2012."

C127 3.2.9 Policy 2 Officers Amend text to “within the existing main built up area of Nottingham” Consistency M128 3.2.9 Policy 2 Officers Add after ‘Field Farm’

"… , and development in the vicinity of the propose d HS2 station at Toton "


C129 3.2.10 Policy 2 Consultee Amend last sentence of para 3.2.10 to read "… whilst Ashfield District Council is also proposi ng a sustainable urban extension strategic site on brownfield land to the south of Hucknall."


C130 3.2.13 Policy 2 Consultee Amend paragraph 3.2. 13 to read "These include are Top Wighay Farm (where the allocation has been expanded to include part of land that was previousl y safeguarded), Gedling Colliery/Chase Farm (Gedling), and the East side, Southside and Waterside Regeneration Zones (Nottingham City). In addition, North of Papplewick Lane (Gedling) was previously designated as safeguarded land (see glossary) and the precise scale of develo pment is still under discussion ."


C131 3.2.17 Policy 2 Officers 2nd sentence reads “defined in site a specific” should be “defined in a site specific”

Correction


28

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C132 3.2.17 Policy 2 Officers 5th line: Cossall needs adding to the list of settlements not listed in policy 2.

Text amended Correction

C133 3.2.19 Policy 2 Officers Amend text to read “the main built up area of Greater Nottingham”

Consistency

M134 3.2.19 Policy 2 Officers Add in the justification f ollowing the words ‘employment development’ "… subject to confirmation of land required for acc ess and other arrangements associated with the proposed HS2 stati on, and "


M135 3.2.19 Policy 2 Officers Add the following to repla ce the existing last sentence- "... This strategy therefore performs best in terms of deliverability, sustainability and meeting local housing needs. The proposed HS2 station at Toton will add significantly to the tran sport and economic sustainability of this area for new development. Th is strategy therefore performs best in terms of deliverability, sustainab ility, maximising opportunities for economic development, job creatio n and contributing to local housing needs. "


M136 3.2.21 Policy 2 Officers Add after ‘Boots campus’ "… and land in the vicinity of the proposed HS2 sta tion at Toton ."


C137 3.2.24 Policy 2 Officers Amend 3rd sentence of paragraph 3.2.24 onwards to read "The redevelopment of Gedling Colliery/Chase Farm is a key strategic site on the urban edge of Nottingham and is identified as a broad location for future development. The current economic difficulties mean that comprehensive development is not considered achievable in the short term but the site remains available and suitable regeneration priority for Gedling Borough Council but it is acknowledged that there are challenging delivery issues for this former colliery site which means delivery is unlikely within the plan period. However the site is identified in the Aligned Core Strategies as a potential future site on which delivery will be explored subject to economic conditions and funding availability."

clarification

C138 3.2.25 Policy 2 Officers 4th/5th lines: delete “also” after “have” and before “traditional” Correction C139 3.2.31 Policy 2 Officers 2nd sentence says “compliment” but should be “complement” Correction


29

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C140 3.2.33 Policy 2 Officers 3rd/4th lines other DPDs need mentioning here for clarification,

“Supplementary Planning Documents, Development Management policies, Masterplans or other DPDs”

Correction

C141 3.2.33 Policy 2 Consultee Amend justification text of Para 3.2.33 to read "The role of the City Centre will be is expected to be supported and enhanced in line with its regional status, as set o ut in policy 5, and in particular through improvements and development at the Broadmarsh and Victoria Centres."


C142 3.2.33 Policy 2 Officers Lower case for “Ttown Ccentre” and “Ddistrict Ccentre” Consistency C143 3.2.34 Policy 2 Consultee Amend para 3.2.34 to read

"Upgrading existing infrastructure and providing ne w infrastructure will therefore be aimed at reducing the need to travel, especially by private car, however, it is recognised in rural areas there may be limited alternatives available ."


C144 3.2.34 Policy 2 Officers 5th line: Should be “people's” Correction C145 3.2.36 Policy 2 Officers Last few words need rewording to correct English, should read “…

contingency site if development elsewhere is not be delivered as planned.” Correction

C146 3.3.2 Policy 3 Officers Add the word “the” before “relative importance of different green belt purposes”

Correction

C147 3.3.3 Policy 3 Officers Delete “or indicating locations for” Correction M148 3.3.3a Policy 3 Officers Add new paragraph 3.3.3a

"In Broxtowe Borough the Green Belt will be amended to allow for the long term construction of the proposed HS2 station at Toton and a mixed use development in the vicinity of it includi ng access arrangements, a NET extension and mixed use economi c and housing development. Amendments to the Green Belt will be u ndertaken as part of the Allocations DPD when issues associated with HS2 are clear. "


C149 3.3.5a Policy 3 Consultee Add additional para 3.3.5a to read "The Councils will set out their policies on develo pment in the Green Belt in their Development Plan Documents."



30

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C150 Policy 4.1b) Policy 4 Consultee Amend 4.1b) po licy text (after figures for each district) to read :

“The level of development of office floorspace will be kept under review. If it appears likely that the provision of undeveloped floorspace will falls …”


C151 Policy 4.1b) Policy 4 Officers Use “5 years” rather than “five years” for consistency Consistency M152 Policy 4.1e) Policy 4 Officers add after ‘Top Wigha y’

"… land in the vicinity of the proposed HS2 station at Toton (Broxtowe) …"


C153 Policy 4.1hii) Policy 4 Officers Amend text to read "retaining good quality existing employment sites ..."

Clarity

C154 Policy 4, footnote

Policy 4 Officers Delete 2nd “2009”. Correction

C155 3.4.6 Policy 4 Consultee Add new sentence to j ustification text para 3.4.6 after 1st sentence "... This can include sites in adjoining local auth ority areas, for example the Rolls Royce site in the Hucknall part of Ashfie ld District, which will serve the employment needs of the conurbation as a whole. "


M156 3.4.6 Policy 4 Officers Add before ‘East Midland Ai rport’ "… the proposed HS2 hub station at Toton and ..."


C157 3.4.19 Policy 4 Consultee and officers

Amend para 3.4.19 of the justification text to read : "Based on policy recommendations from the Employmen t Land Study, existing employment land and premises will be prote cted which Local Development Documents will protect existing employm ent lands and premises which: • Safeguards well-located land that continues to me et the needs of modern businesses (for instance by having good acce ss to the transport network and labour markets, and being pre mises capable of economic reuse), especially larger sites that may be considered strategically important sites ."

In response to consultee comments and clarification


31

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C158 3.4.22 Policy 4 Officers Change “to reskilling” to “reskill” Correction C159 3.4.22 Policy 4 Consultee At end of para 3.4.2 2 add

"There is strong evidence that increasing employmen t and prosperity across the social gradient will also contribute to improving health and wellbeing and reducing inequalities."


C160 3.4.23 Policy 4 Officers 2nd line: Delete “(including food production)” as unnecessary Correction C161 3.4.22 Policy 4 Officers 6th line: Delete the comma after “development,” Correction C162 3.4.24 Policy 4 Officers Replace “criterion” with “criteria” Correction C163 Policy 5.1a.ii) Policy 5 Consultee Amend text of Policy 5.1a.ii to read

"Safeguarding the Primary Shopping Frontages as the focus for City Centre retail development to reinforce the north-s outh and east-west shopping patterns and connect the main retail desti nations in the City ;"


C164 Policy 5.1d.iii) Policy 5 Officers Replace “pr oviding ” with the additional text “promoting a ” to make it clear that this will be part of a development schem e (rather than being provided by the Council).

Clarification

C165 Policy 5.1g) Policy 5 Consultee Replace 5.1.g bullet point "Exploiting the rich historic, cultural and high qu ality built environment to attract visitors and tourists, supported by the development of appropriate facilities, and promoting events, marke ts and attractions . Preserving and enhancing the rich historic, cultura l and high quality built environment, recognising the positive contrib ution it makes to local character and distinctiveness and utilising i ts potential to attract visitors and tourists, supported by the development of appropriate facilities, events, markets and attractions ."



32

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C166 3.5.1 Policy 5 Consultee Amend justification t ext of para 3.5.1 to read

"Significant change is planned to the City Centre o ver the Core Strategy period with large scale retail de velopment at the Broadmarsh Centre with improvements and development at the Broadmarsh Centre and the Victoria Centre. Development at the Broadmarsh Cen tre will be complemented by a new Midland Rail Station/NET inte rchange and other development in the Southside Regeneration Zone (see Policy &) improving the important ‘Gateway’ to the City Centr e. This development in the south of the City Centre will be balanced by redevelopment of the Victoria Centre in the north t o help maintain the strong north -south r etail patterns. In addition to this…"


C167 3.5.3 Policy 5 Consultee Amend justification t ext of para 3.5.3 to read "The Greater Nottingham Retail Study indicates that during the Core Strategy period there will be sufficient increased spending capacity across the City Centre’s catchment area to support significant new comparison shopping floorspace. However due to the continuing effects of the recession, the Study may overstate r etail capacity available over the plan period. Retail capacity pr ojections will need to be updated and monitored, and a review of the Great er Nottingham Retail Study will be a priority, with its findings informing the City Council’s Land and Planning Policies Development Pl an Document. The study t reats the Broadmarsh centre redevelopment as a comm itment, and indicates additional capacity over and above th is for 30,200 square metres at 2021, rising to 58,400 square metres at 2 026."



33

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C168 3.5.4 Policy 5 Consultee Amend justification t ext of para 3.5.4 to read

"Development proposals at the Broadmarsh and Victor ia Centres, and the reoccupation of vacant floorspace, are key prio rities for City Centre retailing . Current proposals for the Victoria Centre redeve lopment indicate proposed comparison floorspace of 30,000 s quare metres. Both schemes These proposals, together with the redevelopment o f the Broadmarsh Centre will also deliver further convenience shopping and leisure opportunities. Assuming that both the Bro admarsh and Victoria Centres are developed as currently envisaged, and t rading fully by 2017, based on the Greater Nottingham Retail Study there will be limited capacity for further major comparison retail develo pment prior to 2021. If fully implemented, the two development schemes c ould accommodate growth in comparison retailing expenditure over a s ignificant part of the plan period, so further major retail development wi ll only be appropriate if evidence demonstrates the additional shopping fl oorspace growth can be accommodated. Once both schemes are committed, the focus of retail development will therefore be on the refurbi shment, rationalisation and consolidation of the wider City Centre retail o ffer."


C169 3.5.5 Policy 5 Consultee Amend justification t ext of para 3.5.5 to read "Protecting and enhancing the City Centre’s retail and leisure functions is the best defence against the potential impact of out -of -town out of centre shopping or leisure developments, and their attend ant threats to the City Centre’s vitality and viability. The Nati onal Planning Policy Framework continues to see City Centre in centre and then edge of centre developments as being preferable, and the ev idence suggests no need to identify or plan for additional out -of -town out of centre comparison retail development."


C170 3.5.10 Policy 5 Consultee Amend text of para 3.5.10 to read: "Nottingham’s historic, cultural and high quality b uilt environment is a unique asset for the conurbation, which makes a pos itive contribution to the local character and distinctiveness of the city Centre, and has the potential to which could make a more significant contribution to the economic well being of the conurbation…"



34

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C171 Policy 6.2 Policy 6 Consultee Amend Policy 6.2 to read

"The boundaries of centres and the identification o f sites for main town centre uses to meet identified need will be defined in site specific Development Plan Documents. The boundaries of centres, primary shopping areas and the identification of sites for main town centre uses to meet identified need will be defined in Site Spe cific Development Plan Documents. Development on identified sites should be appropri ate in scale and nature to the role and function of that c entre and of the area it serves."


C172 Policy 6.3 Policy 6 Consultee Amend policy tex t to read A Nnew Centres of Neighbourhood Importance to serve the new sustainable communities y at the Waterside Regeneration Zone (Nottingham City) and at Local Centre at Gedling Colliery/Chase Farm (Gedling), if development commences in the plan per iod, will be required. New retail development at these location s will be expected to consolidate and strengthen the network and hierarch y of centres and not harm the viability and vitality of existing cen tres.


C173 Policy 6.3 Policy 6 Consultee Start last sente nce of Policy 6.3 as a new section of Policy 6 (ie number 6.4 and amend numbering of existing sections 4, 5 a nd 6).


C174 Policy 6.4b) (6.5b))

Policy 6 Officers Lower case for “Ttown Ccentre” Consistency

C175 Policy 6.5 (6.6) Policy 6 Officers Lower case for “Ddistrict” and “Ttown Ccentre” Consistency


35

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C176 Policy 6.6

(6.7) Policy 6 Consultee Amendments to Policy 6.6

Policy 6.6 deleted "Development of retail and leisure uses in out -of and edge -of -centre locations will need to demonstrate suitability through a sequ entia l site approach and also provide a robust assessment of impact on n earby centres. Subsequent Development Plan Documents will determine the need to set thresholds for the scale of main town centre development in ed ge-of and out -of centre locations." and replaced with "Main town centre uses should be located in centres . Development should be appropriate in scale and nature to the ro le and function of the centre. If no suitable sites are available in centr es then edge-of-centre locations should be used, and only if there are no suitable sites will out of centre sites be considered. Proposals for edge of centre and out of centre sites should satisfy the sequential test and show how the development will not have an adverse impact on any centre. Subsequent Development Plan Documents will set thre sholds where impact assessments will be required for main town c entre development in edge of and out of centre locations. "


C177 3.6.1 Policy 6 Officers/Consultee 6th line: Reference should be to Map 3.1 rather than 3.2 . Lower case for “T town C centre” and “L local” for consistency

Correction and in response to consultee


36

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C178 3.6.2 Policy 6 Consultee Amend para 3.6.2 text to read

“…This approach is reaffirmed by the National Plann ing Policy Framework, which requires local authorities to deve lop a sequential approach towards accommodating new retail and town centre development within, or adjoining its centres apply a sequential test to accommodating new main town centre uses, requiring proposals to be located in town centres, then in edge of centre loc ations and only if suitable sites are not available should out of cent re sites be considered .”


C179 3.6.3 Policy 6 Consultee Amend text of para 3. 6.3 to read: "The National Planning Policy Framework also requir es Councils to demonstrate through Development Plan Documents how they can meet identified needs for main town centre uses. In achi eving this, Councils will be guided by evidence from their Retail Needs Studies. These provide detailed data on the level of need for comp arison and convenience floorspace both within identified centr es and also across local authority areas as a whole, and will be regul arly reviewed to inform future planning decisions ."


C180 3.6.3 Policy 6 Consultee Add new sentence to t he end of this paragraph to read "This evidence in conjunction with a clear definiti on of primary and secondary frontages, will be used to assist the def ining of the extent of town centres, primary shopping areas and the identi fication of sites for main town centre uses to meet identified need. "


C181 3.6.5 Policy 6 Officers 1st-3rd lines: Amend commas to “Large new communities, mainly on urban extension sites, are proposed, and, to meet their needs...”

Correction

C182 3.6.6 Policy 6 Officers Lower case for “Town Ccentre” to start of sentence Consistency C183 3.6.6 Policy 6 Officers Remove “town ” from second sentence in the paragraph to clarify that

offices of appropriate scale could be suitable in D istrict and Local Centres.

Clarification

C184 3.6.7 Policy 6 Officers 5th line: Remove Stapleford from the list of centres as not specifically mentioned in the policy

Correction


37

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C185 3.6.9 Policy 6 Consultee Amend justification t ext of para 3.6.9 to read:

"... methods of travel. Proposals for out of centre or edge of centre retail development and main town centre uses will therefor e be required to strongly demonstrate both a sequential approach to its their location and how it they will not have an unacceptable significant adverse impact on the vitality and viability of nearby centres, or on existing, committed and planned public and private investment in a centre or centres in the catchment area of the proposals undermine regenerative activities within them ."


C186 Policy 7.1.g Policy 7 Officers 1st line: Replace with capital “L” for “local” Consistency C187 Policy 7.2 Policy 7 Officers 2nd line: Add “to” before “above”. Correction C188 Policy 7.2 Policy 7 Officers 3rd line, delete end of sentence

“,or adopted Masterplans”

Correction

C189 Policy 3.7.1 Policy 7 Consultee Amend text at the end of justification text 3.7.1 to read "… Where remediation of sites is proposed practical sustainable remediation technologies should be incorporated whe re applicable ."


C190 3.7.3 Policy 7 Officers Amend last sentence to read "Given the economic circumstances prevailing in the short term, this is likely to involve an approach emphasising on the development of key sites, and on capitalising on their locational advantages, not only with regard not only to the proximity of the City Centre, but also to the ease of access to renewable energy networks."

Correction

C191 3.7.4 Policy 7 Officers 1st/2nd lines amend text to read “The combined sites of the Boots Campus (in both Broxtowe and Nottingham City) and adjacent Severn Trent land (solely within Broxtowe) cross the administrative boundary therefore a partnership approach to its development is being pursued.”

Correction

C192 3.7.5 Policy 7 Consultee Add to end of the bul let point of para 3.7.5: • "Where relevant, addressing issues in relation to equalities matters and health and wellbeing ."


C193 3.7.7 Policy 7 Officers 7th line: Comma before “, for instance,” rather than after it Correction


38

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C194 Policy 7 –

monitoring arrangements

Policy 7 Officers Bullet point 1 and 2 merged to read "Site specific Allocations Development Plan Document "

Correction

C195 Policy 8.1 Policy 8 Consultee Amend Policy 8.1 text to read: “Residential development should maintain, provide a nd contribute to a mix of housing tenures, types and sizes in order to create mixed and balanced sustainable, inclusive and mixed communities”


C196 Policy 8.2 Policy 8 Officers 2nd sentence amend to “emphasis on” rather than “emphasis of” Correction C197 Policy 8.4e) Policy 8 Consultee Amend policy text 8.4e) to read

"… the need to redress the housing mix within areas of concentration of student households and Houses in Multiple Occupatio n"


C198 Polivy 8.7 Policy 8 Officer Amend policy text 8.7 to read "In the case of larger phased developments the level of affordable housing will be considered on a site by site basis ..."

Clarification

C199 3.8.1 Policy 8 Consultee Amend text to read "… In addition, improving the quality of housing co nditions and design can have substantial impacts on improving health in equalities..."


C200 3.8.2 Policy 8 Officers 6th line: Add comma after “areas,”. Correction C201 3.8.3 Policy 8 Consultee Delete para 3.8.4 and amend justification text 3.8.3 to read

"…it is therefore important that new developments p rovide a range of types of housing , including housing likely to be a ttractive to older persons ."


C202 3.8.4 Policy 8 Consultee Delete para 3.8.4 "Emerging older pe rsons research indicates that a majority of the elderly population interviewed would wish to remain in housing that they currently occupy for as long as possible. Res pondents to surveys have also indicated that if they had to move to pro perties in the fut ure their aspirations would include 2 bedroom bungalows or purpose built ‘retirement villages’. "



39

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C203 3.8.7 Policy 8 Officers 1st/2nd lines: Amend the three inverted commas as are the wrong way

around. Correction

C204 3.8.8 Policy 8 Consultee Amend para 3.8.8 to r ead "The number of full-time students attending univers ities in the area has increased considerably in recent years. The process of change brought about by increased numbers of students living in pr ivate rented households households and Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs ) has altered the residential profile of some neighbourho ods dramatically, and has led to unsustainable communities and associated amenity issues. to communities becoming unbalanced . This problem is most acute within Nottingham City, and in order to help address this some of the problems related to increased concentrations of students liv ing within neighbourhoods , the City Council has adopted its Building Balance d Communities Supplementary Planni ng Document, which provides further guidance on the provision of student housin g. It has also introduced an Article 4 Direction that will mean fr om 11 March 2012 planning permission will be required requires planning permission to be obtained before converting a family house (C3 Dwellinghouse ) to a House in Multiple Occupation with between 3 and 6 u nrelated occupiers sharing facilities basic amenities (C4 HMO), thereby enabling it to better manage the future growth and distribution of C4 HMO s across the City . The policy approach to considering planning applica tions for student accommodation, C4 HMOs and larger ‘sui generis’ HMO s with 7 or more occupiers sharing facilities basic amenities these changes of us e will be set out in its site specific Development Plan Docum ent."


C205 3.8.11 Policy 8 Officers Affordable housing ta ble updated to show 2012 Update (added column and figures) and amended text to para 3.8.11 to rea d: "… outlined in the East Midlands Regional Plan . A further Affordable Needs update was undertaken in 2012. The need levels …" Addition column shows figures "Broxtowe 535 Gedling 301 Nottingham City 444 " of "Potential level of net affordable housing nee d per annum (2012 update) " and amend footnote to add "and 2012"

Updated information including change relating to the RS being revoked


40

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C206 new 3.8.11a Policy 8 Officers New para 3.8.1 1a added to explain about the updated Affordable N eeds

Update 2012 to read "The 2012 update found increased levels of need in the Housing Market Area (albeit that need had declined in Gedling). T his is largely due to the housing market conditions prevailing at the ti me, in particular the lack of availability of mortgage finance meaning it is more difficult for households to access the housing market (house pric es themselves are lower in real terms than in 2009, and interest rate s on mortgages are also at historically low levels). As economic cond itions and access to credit improve, affordability will also improve tow ards the level identified in the 2009 needs update. This demonstr ates the volatility of affordable housing need, and highlights uncertainti es associated with projecting annual need assessed at one point in tim e over the plan period. For this reason, the Councils consider the monitoring of need should be undertaken on the basis of the Affordable Housing Needs update 2009, because these figures reflect a period of more buoyant housing market conditions, rather than the 2012 inf ormation. Affordable housing need will be monitored and kept under revie w, and a full review of the Strategic Housing Market Assessment will be undertaken after the production of government Household Projections base d on the results of the 2011 Census, which are expected to be publis hed in 2014. "

Updated information

C207 3.8.12 Policy 8 Officers Amend first sentence to read "The 2009 Nottingham Core Strategic Housing Market Area Assessment findings equate ..."

Updated information

C208 3.8.13 Policy 8 Officers Add “Given the …” at the start of 3rd sentence Correction

C209 Policy 8 monitoring

Policy 8 Oficers Amend 2nd monitoring target to read "Provision of affordable housing (6,725 for monitoring purposes – made up of 1845 in Broxtowe, 1450 in Gedling and 3430 in Nottingham City)"

Clarification


Policy 8 Officers Delete comma after “by”, in the box for the second indicator Correction


Policy 8 Officers Delete “Intermediate rent” as this is part of “Intermediate housing” Correction


41

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C212 Policy 9.3a) Policy 9 Consultee Amend text i n policy 9.3a) to read

"… protection of the natural, built and … historica l historic environment…"


C213 Policy 10.1.d Policy 10 Officers Amend text to read “to meet evolving demands changing needs of occupiers …”

Correction

C214 Policy 10.2 Policy 10 Consultee Amend text of Policy 10.2 to read as follows: 2. additional criteria between f & g: "g) the ground conditions of the site, including th at arising from land instability or contamination, together with the mit igation/remediation proposed or required. "


C215 Policy 10.5 Policy 10 Officers last line: Add a full-stop at the end of the sentence. Correction C216 3.10.4 Policy 10 Officers 2nd line Delete “and” after “Green Belt” Correction C217 3.10.5 Policy 10 Officers Add additional sentence after the 2nd sentence to read

“However it is recognised that it can be difficult to achieve these standards on smaller schemes therefore the policy offers some flexibility to deal with this.”

Clarification

C218 3.10.7 Policy 10 Officers 3rd line: Add comma after “methodology” Correction C219 3.10.9 Policy 10 Officers Amend text to “the main built up area of Nottingham” Consistency C220 Policy 11.2c) Policy 11 Consultee Text of poli cy 11.2c) to read

“… such as Sherwood Forest, other ancient or mature woodland …”


C221 Policy 11.2e) Policy 11 Officers/Consultee Amend text to read "e) prominent L listed B buildings and Scheduled Monument "


C222 Policy 11.3e) Policy 11 Consultee Spilt bullet point e) with new bullet point starting “Where there is a loss in whole …” and renumbering of bullet points as a result


C223 Policy 11.3a) Policy 11 Officers Capitalise Conservation Areas to read "… existing and planned Cconservation Aareas …"

Consistency

C224 Policy 11.3e) Policy 11 Officers/Consultee 1st line: Add “is ” after “environment”. In response to consultee comments


42

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C225 3.11.1 Policy 11 Officers/Consultee 4th line capitalise Listed Buildings, World Heritag e Sites, Historic Parks

and Gardens and Scheduled Ancient Monuments to read "Designated Hheritage assets include L listed B buildings, Conservation Areas, Wworld H heritage S sites, historic Registered Pparks and G gardens and Sscheduled A ancient M monuments."


C226 3.11.1 Policy 11 Officers Line 3, “Heritage” should have small “h” for consistency – replace with “heritage”

Correction

C227 3.11.3 Policy 11 Consultee Amend para 3.11.3 t o read "…considered to be particularly important to the pl an area as a whole ."


C228 3.11.4 Policy 11 Officers Amend 2nd sentence o f justification text 3.11.4 to read “…When considering sites of potential archaeological importance, including those as identified on in the Historic Environment Record for the area, the Local Authority will …”


C229 3.11.6 Policy 11 Officers/Consultee Amend text to read "This could include bringing an historic listed historic building back…"


C230 3.11.7 Policy 11 Officers Last sentence, amend to “approach to the maintenance” Correction C231 3.11.9 Policy 11 Consultee Delete last sentenc e of Policy 11 justification text 3.11.9 and replac e with

"In these rare cases steps should be taken to ensur e that the asset is fully recorded prior to it being lost. " "… In these cases steps should be taken to ensure t hat the assets are appropriately recorded before they are damaged or d estroyed."



Policy 11 Officers In the table, “Heritage assets” should be lower case – replace with “heritage assets” as that has been used in most places

Consistency

C233 Policy 12.1 Policy 12 Consultee Amend second s entence of Policy 12.1 to read "In particular, where there is an evidenced need , new or improved community facilities…"


C234 Policy 12 2a) Policy 12 Officers Lower case for “tTown cCentre” for consistency Correction C235 3.12.1 Policy 12 Officers 2nd line: Apostrophe after the “s” in “Councils’”, rather than before it. Correction


43

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C236 3.12.2 Policy 12 Officers Amend text to “…population where there is a spatial element to their location

in the conurbation demand for these services.” legibility

C237 3.12.3 Policy 12 Officers 6th line: Comma rather than semi-colon after “community”. Correction C238 3.12.5 Policy 12 Officers 2nd line: “...its their continued use as community facility facilities...”, rather

than the singular Correction

C239 3.12.8 Policy 12 Officers 1st line: amend to “include” rather than “includes”. Correction C240 3.12.8 Policy 12 Consultee Amend Para 3.12.8 t o read

"... health centres GP surgeries , GP practices, community pharmacies " In response to consultee comments

C241 Policy 13.1b) Policy 13 Officers Amend policy text to read "new cultural and tourism facilities of more local importance will be located in or adjoining town or district centres, or improving existing facilities will be improved;"

Correction

C242 3.13.1 Policy 13 Officers Add to end of final sentence, “for instance, the City Council is seekin g funding opportunities to develop a new Central Libr ary in the City Centre. ”

Clarification

C243 3.13.4 Policy 13 Officers 3rd line: correct title is “New Art Exchange” Correction C244 3.13.4 Policy 13 Officers last line: Delete “and/or catchment” as in this context “population” and

“catchment” are the same thing. Add “the” before “population”. Correction

C245 Policy 14.2 Policy 14 Consultee Amend policy 1 4.2 second sentence to read: “… The effective operation of the highway network a nd, its ability to provide sustainable transport solutions or support economic growth should not be compromised”


C246 Policy 14.3 Policy 14 Officers Amend text to read “… transport networks to serve new development, in particular”.

Clarification

C247 Policy 14.3c) Policy 14 Officers 2nd line, add “facilities” after “cycling”. Clarification C248 Policy 14.3d) Policy 14 Consultee Amend text o f Policy 14 3 d) to read

"Network Management measures then highway capacity enhancement to deal with severe impacts arising from residual car demand where the initiatives required under points (a) to (c) above are insufficient to avoid significant additional car journeys”



44

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C249 Policy 14.4 Policy 14 Consultee Amend the orde r within policy 14.4 to read:

“There will be a level of iteration between the sta ges of the hierarchy above to ensure their effective delivery having regard t o the role and function of the highway network and the implementation of the approach will have regard to the needs of people wi th mobility difficulties.”


C250 3.14.3 Policy 14 Officers 3rd line, comma after “and”, rather than before Correction C251 3.14.3 Policy 14 Officers Amend text for last sentence to “…for instance at Ppark and Rride or Ttram

stops.” Consistency

C252 3.14.6 Policy 14 Officers Amend text to read "This will be key to the sustainable delivery of Core Strategy objectives, and will require the commitment and close cooperation between the Highway Authorities, the three Highway Agency and other transport providers. "

Correction

C253 3.14.11 Policy 14 Officers Last line, add “district” after “town”. Correction C254 3.14.12 Policy 14 Consultee Additional justifi cation text to be added before para 3.14.12:

"The Strategic Road Network (SRN) of motorways and trunk roads plays an important role in supporting the economy of Grea ter Nottingham. The emphasis on sustainable measures will assist in saf eguarding the operation of the SRN but proposed growth in Greater Nottingham will give rise to cumulative impacts on the SRN. The com mitted A453 improvement will improve the operation of this key gateway into Greater Nottingham. Other elements of the SRN will be safeg uarded chiefly through measures at key junctions, including networ k management and localised capacity improvements. The local authori ties in the area and the Highway Agency will work together to examine th e cumulative impacts of development on strategic routes across t he area with a view to identifying appropriate route measures that can be brought forward to support growth. "


C255 Policy 14 monitoring arrangements

Policy 14 Officers Add “town,” before “district” in the first “Indicators” box. Correction


45

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C256 Policy 14

monitoring arrangements

Policy 14 Consultee Add new bullet point to the Del ivery column “Consultation with the local Highway Authorities ”


C257 Policy 15.4c) Policy 15 Consultee Amend text t o read "c) A52 Junction Improvements (in Rushcliff e Borough between A6200 Derby Road and Bingham );"


C258 Policy 15.5a) Policy 15 Officers Add “Borough” after “Erewash”, Consistency C259 Policy 15.5f) Policy 15 Consultee Add bullet p oint to Policy 15.5

“f) Hucknall Town Centre Improvement Scheme (Ashfie ld District) ”


M260 Policy 15.5 Policy 15 Officers Add at the end of 5. Local and National schemes which will impact on the plan area if implemented include: "f) HS2 hub Station at Toton to serve the East Midl ands; and g) Extension to NET to serve the new station "


C261 Policy 15.6 Policy 15 Consultee Policy 15.6 am end text to read “Further transport infrastructure schemes are likel y to emerge through Local Transport Plan reviews, preparation of route strategies by the Highways Agency, through Transport Assessments for development sites and subsequent Development Plan Documents.


C262 3.15.1 Policy 15 Officers 4th line: Delete the “the” before “Policy 2”. Correction C263 3.15.1 Policy 15 Officers 5th line: Reference should be to points “3” only, rather than “1 and 2”. Correction C264 3.15.2 Policy 15 Consultee In the first senten ce amend text to read

“… no currently available funding some of which have nevertheless have been or are included …”


C265 3.15.3 Policy 15 Officers Line 1, add “or long-time delivery timescales” to refer to the longer term delivery timescales for “High Speed Rail”

Clarification

C266 Monitoring arrangements for Policy 15

Policy 15 Officers “Highways” (plural) Agency in the “Delivery” box Correction


46

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C267 Policy 16.4 Policy 16 Consultee Reword Policy 16.4 to state

“… Exceptions may be made if the park or open spa ce is shown to be underused or undervalued, the development is a small part of the Green Infrastructure network and will not be detrimental to its function, or the development is a use associated with parks and open spaces or if none of the above apply the park or open space is shown to be underused or undervalued .


C268 3.16.2 Policy 16 Officers 6th line: Reference should be to paragraph 3.17.3 rather than 3.17.4 Correction C269 3.16.3 Policy 16 Consultee Amend text in para 3.16.3 to read

“…river corridors provide the opportunity to help t ackle climate change through energy production and flood attenuation whe re appropriate …”


C270 3.16.3 Policy 16 Consultee Add to para 3.16.3 justification text at "…energy production and flood protection where appr opriate . All water courses in and adjacent to new developments provide opportunities to create enhanced green corridors including the poten tial for opening up culverted water courses ."


C271 3.16.6 Policy 16 Consultee Add addition text t o justification text at para 3.16.6 … healthy lifestyle and contribute to health improv ement through increasing physical activity and improving mental w ellbeing, …


C272 3.16.7 Policy 16 Consultee Reword justificatio n of the last sentence to para 3.16.7 “…provided the loss can be mitigated or compensated replaced by equivalent or better provision in a suitable locati on.


C273 3.16.9 Policy 16 Officers 1st/2nd lines: delete “A variety of approaches will be used in...delivering a strategic approach” and replace with “A strategic approach will be used in the protection of Green Infrastructure”

Clarification


47

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of


Monitoring arrangements

Policy 16 Consultee Amend the monitoring indicator relating to the quality of open spaces by adding the following indicators "● Number of SINCs under positive conservation manage ment, using Single Data List indicator 160 ● Number of Local Nature Reserves with a management plan in place ”


C275 Monitoring arrangements for Policy 16

Policy 16 Officers Replace “S106s” with “S106” Correction

C276 Plan 3.3 Diagrams Officers ‘Sub Regional Green Infrastructure Corridors’ changed to ‘Strategic Green Infrastructure’

Correction

C277 Policy 17.1 Policy 17 Officers Delete “the” on the 1st line so reads “bBiodiversity will be increased over the Core Strategy period …”

Correction

C278 Policy 17.1b) Policy 17 Officers/Consultee Amend text to read “b) ensuring that fragmentation of the Green Infrastructure network is avoided wherever appropri ate possible and improvements to the network benefit biodiversity, i ncluding at a landscape scale, through the incorporation of existing habitats and the creation of new habitats”


C279 Policy 17.1e) Policy 17 Consultee Amend policy text 17.1e) to read “… as a minimum firstly mitigate or and if not possible, compensate at a level equivalent to the biodiversity value of the h abitat lost”


C280 Policy 17.2 Policy 17 Consultee/ Officer Amend the text of policy 17.2 by deleting "… the designation of further protected sites will be pursued " and replace with "… further sites will be designated wh ere they meet the relevant national or local criteria ."

In response to consultee comments/ clarification

C281 Policy 17.3 Policy 17 Consultee Amend policy t ext to read: Development on or affecting other, non-designated sites or wildlife corridors with biodiversity value will only be perm itted where it can be demonstrated that the there is an overriding need for the development outweighs any harm caused by for the development and that adequate mitigation measures are put in place.



48

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C282 3.17.1 Policy 17 Consultee Add new text to the end of paragraph 3.17.1 to read

"...and also recognises the need to prevent the los s or deterioration of irreplaceable habitats such as ancient woodland ."


C283 3.17.2 Policy 17 Officers Delete the word “legally” in 2nd line Correction C284 3.17.4 Policy 17 Consultee Add new text to the first sentence of paragraph 3.17.4 to read

"...and these could include brownfield as well as G reenfield sites ." In response to consultee comments

C285 3.17.5 Policy 17 Officers/Consultee Amend justification text 3.17.5 as suggested to rea d “Proposed development should particularly seek to contribute towards delivery of the Local Biodiversity Action Plan objectives for habitats and species. The Nottinghamshire Local Biodiversity Action Plan identifies priority wildlife habitats …”


C286 3.17.5 Policy 17 Officers 5th line, “sets” rather than “to set”. Correction C287 3.17.5 Policy 17 Officers 8th line, Delete comma after “habitats”. Correction C288 3.17.5 Policy 17 Consultee Add new text to the end of paragraph 3.17.5 to read

"Where development of land is proposed that is know n or likely to be used by European protected and other species, furth er guidance is available from Natural England’s website. "


C289 Policy 17 Monitoring arrangements (Retain Areas of Biodiversity Importance )

Policy 17 Consultee Amend the monitoring indicator relating to retaining area of biodiversity important: "Number of incidents of unmitigated loss of SINCs d ue to development " and replace with "Net change in the area of SINCs "



49

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of


Monitoring arrangements (Improve management of biodiversity sites)

Policy 17 Consultee Amend the monitoring indicator relating to retaining area of biodiversity important: "Number of SSSIs in a favourable condition " and replace with "Number of SINCs under positive conservation management, us ing Single Data List indicator 160 " and also add "Number of Local Nature Reserves with a management plan in place "



Policy 17 Officers Add “Development Plan Documents” to the Delivery column as these are also a delivery mechanism

Clarification

C292 Section D: Making it happen, Page 115

Other Officers 4th line, “Appendices” rather than “Appendix”. Correction

C293 Section D making it happen

Other Officers Amend “Including” to “included” Correction

C294 Policy 18.4 Policy 18 Officers 3rd/4th lines replace “or” with “such as in” Legibility C295 3.18.2 Policy 18 Officers 2nd line, delete comma after “facilities” Correction C296 3.18.3 Policy 18 Officers Line 6, remove “(see Glossary)” as unnecessary reference Correction

C297 3.18.4a Policy 18 Consultee Add addition justi fication text para after 3.18.4a "Transport modelling identifies that any issues ari sing at a strategic level can be managed via mitigation measures such a s improved public transport and Smarter Choices packages to accommoda te delivery of the quantum and distribution of development set out in the Aligned Core Strategies. However local interventions will be nec essary. These local interventions will depend on the final agreed devel opments and their configuration as set out in DPD and master-plans as appropriate which will be informed by wider route strategies prepared by the Highway Agency and local authorities. "


C298 3.18.5 Policy 18 Officers Delete “be” in the first sentence after “are” and before “identified” Legibility


50

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C299 Monitoring

arrangements Policy 18

Policy 18 Officers “Reports” rather than “Reviews” in the “Indicator” box. Correction

C300 Policy 19.3 Policy 19 Consultee Amend policy t ext 19.3 "… either individually or collectively"


C301 3.19.1 Policy 19 Consultee Add sentence to jus tification text 3.19.1 “Contributions from one or more developments may be pooled where appropriate, subject to adherence to future restric tions on pooling of developer contributions. ”


C302 3.19.1 Policy 19 Consultee Add text to the end of justification text of para 3.19.1 "… When negotiating developer contributions, consid eration will be given to changes in economic conditions over time a nd scheme viability .


C303 3.19.2 Policy 19 Officers Bullet point 8 after “including” add “libraries,” and bullet point 9 delete “(including libraries)”“

Correction

C304 3.19.3 Policy 19 Officers 1st sentence – delete the first sentence “The ability to put in place a Community Infrastructure Levy (2010) came into force on 6 April 2010”. And instead start 2nd sentence (now 1st sentence) “Community (CIL) allows …”

Update

C305 3.19.4 Policy 19 Officers 2nd line, reference should be to appendices A and B, rather than B and C. Correction C306 3.19.5 Policy 19 Officers Amend text to read “… Supplementary Local Development Plan Documents

…” Correction

C307 Page 126 Appendix A - Boots

Officers Amend site area text to replace “125ha” with “126ha” Correction


Officers Add text to housing unit info: "1,150 (550 in Broxtowe, upto 600 in Nottingham"

Clarification


Officers Within summary assessment change “Electricity - no known abnormal requirements.” To “Install a new transformer at Boots Primary and a new circuit from there to Nottingham.” Within further work section add “Further dialogue with Western Power.”

Updated information


Officers Within flooding section amend text to replace “1:100 hundred” with “1 in 100” Consistency


51

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C311 Page 126 Appendix A -

Boots Officers Within flooding section amend text to “site specific strategic Fflood Rrisk

Aassessment” Correction


Officers Delete “confirmed in” after “tbc” Consistency


Consultee Add new text to contamination summary: " Permitted waste site present at Harrimans Lane and Heat and Power Plant present on site. " Add new text to further work under contamination: "Potenti al on and off site pollution mitigation measures to be considered as p roposals emerge with further dialogue with the Environment Agency. "



Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary assessment: “Several high quality Listed Buildings on site. ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with Engli sh Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage a ssets. Strategy for reuse and conversion/adaptation costs required as p art of detailed master-plan. ” Under ‘other’ text deleted – “Strategy for r euse and conversion/adaptation costs required as part of det ailed master -plan. ”

Updated information

C315 Page 131 Appendix A - Field Farm

Officers Amend title to "Field Farm, North Of Stapleford (Broxtowe)" Clarification


Officers Add text to end of transport summary assessment "No further highway improvements will be funded by the Highways Agency." Add text to end of transport further work section "Further dialogue with the Highways Agency required regarding access to A52 and A453"

Updated information


Officers Under utilities change text from "Electricity - Additional 33KV Circuits and new 33kV primary substation at Watnall Required" to "Electricity - No abnormal requirements"

Updated Information


Officers Change “Requirements” to “requirements” Correction


Officers Additional text added to Green Infrastructure “Within the Greenwood Community Forest.”

Clarification


Officers Category for “Heritage Assets " added. New text added in summary assessment: “Site is not within a designated Conser vation Area and has no impact upon a designated Conservation Area or he ritage assets. ”

Updated information


52

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C321 Page 132 Appendix A

- Field Farm Officers/Consultee Amend Indicative Assessment to read "No major irresolvable

constraints to development have been identified. Jjoint meetings with the Environment Agency and Severn Trent have identi fied a need for an holistic approach to fluvial, surface water and was te water drainage including recommendations from the Pitt Review whic h are being to be addressed through the progression of the planning a pplication. As part of the processing of the planning application it ha s been identified that 6% of the site comprises Grade 2 Agricultural Land and 33% Grade 3a which amounts to 10.8 hectares. There are two indiv idual and woodland Tree Preservation Orders which were confirmed in 20 12 and extensive open areas of the site are to be retained to allow recreational use and to allow some habitat to encourage barn owl feeding."



Consultee Category for "Other " added. Next text "Potential surface coal reserves and coal mining legacy issues ". New text under further work "Further review and dialogue with Coal Authority "



Officers Amended plan to show updated pedestrian ro ute. Correction


Consultee Amend text in "Other" to read: "Underlyi ng coal strata and coal mining legacy issues." Add text to further work "Further d ialogue with the Coal Authority".


M325 Appendix A - HS2/Toton

Officers Insert new schedule for the proposed site at Toton - see later in this report for full details


C326 Page 135 Appendix A - Awsworth

Officers Under Electricity delete "Additional 33KV Circuits and new 33KV primary substation at Watnall. Potentially – additional 33KV Circuits and new 33KV primary substation in the Stapleford area. Reserved site available." Replace with "Electricity - Additional 33/11KV primary required at Watnall. Depending on phasing of this and other sites reinforcement further up the network may be required by upgrading an existing Bulk Supply Point. New primary at Watnall included in Western Power programme to be implemented by 2015."

Updated Information


Consultee Amend contamination summary: "Areas of p reviously used land and , landfill and waste transfer station present."



53

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of


- Awsworth Officers/Consultee Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary

assessment: “3 Listed buildings are present in Awsw orth ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with Engli sh Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage a ssets. ”

Updated Information


Officers Combine two 'other' categories into one section. Correction


Officers/Consultee Add text to second sentence of Indicative Assessmen t: "An area of former landfill to the south west of the settlement will not impede delivery of the amount of new development proposed for Awsworth with several options available to deliver Awsworth Core Strategy housing numbers ."


C331 Page 136 Indicative Assesment

Appendix A - Awsworth

Officers Within Indicative assessment replace “…but opportunities for earlier delivery on several sites with existing planning permission…” with “but opportunities for earlier delivery on several sites with existing planning permission or allocated for housing in the adopted Broxtowe Local Plan."

Clarification

C332 Page 138 Appendix A - Brinsley

Officers Delete “Electricity - Additional 33kV Circuits and new 33kV primary substation at Watnall. Potentially - additional 33kV Circuits and new 33kV primary substation in the Stapleford area. Reserved site available” Change to “Electricity - Additional 33/11kV primary and circuits in the Eastwood area. Depending on phasing of this and other sites reinforcement further up the network may be required by upgrading an existing Bulk Supply Point” Delete “Included in Western Power programme to be implemented by 2015.”

Updated information


Consultee Amend summary assessment of Health facilities to " Existing residents register at Eastwood, Jacksdale and Underwood."



Officers Amend text to read “Within the Proximity to Greenwood Community Forest and proximity to the Erewash valley.”

Clarification


Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary assessment: “There is one Conservation Area within Brinsley and 2 Listed buildings in the area, in addition to Brinsl ey Headstocks. " New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage a ssets. ”



54

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of


- Brinsley Consultee Amend text in "Other " to read: "Alluviu m deposits and coal strata and

coal mining legacy issues ". " Add text to further work "Further dialogue with the Coal Authority ".



Officers Within indicative assessment replace “…but opportunities for earlier delivery on several sites with existing planning permission…” With “but opportunities for earlier delivery on several sites with existing planning permission or allocated for housing in the adopted Broxtowe Local Plan."

Clarification


Officers/Consultee Add sentence to the end of the first paragraph of t he Indicative assessment as follows "Areas to the west of Brinsle y are visually prominent, include a Mature Landscape Area and seve ral Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation. The amount of d evelopment proposed in the Core Strategy can be accommodated w ithout adversely impacting on these areas. "


C339 Page 141 Appendix A - Eastwood

Officers Delete “Electricity - Additional 33kV Circuits and new 33kV primary substation at Watnall Potentially - additional 33kV Circuits and new 33kV primary substation in the Stapleford area. Reserved site available” Change to “Electricity - Additional 33/11kV primary and circuits in the Eastwood area. Depending on phasing of this and other sites reinforcement further up the network may be required by upgrading an existing Bulk Supply Point.” Delete “Included in Western Power programme to be implemented by 2015.”

Updated information


Officers Amend flooding text to " However the Beavale Brook, and River Erewash and Giltbrook are are located to the north, and west and east of the settlement respectively”

Clarification


Officers Amend flooding text to “Nnorth” and “Wwest” Correction


Officers Amend text to "Within the Close to Greenwood Community Forest and proximity to the Erewash Valley. Large SINC located to the southwest, smaller SINC's to south and east." [apostrophe deleted in SINC]

Correction


Consultee Add text to contamination summary: "In p roximity to a Waste Transfer Station and Household Waste Recycling Station ."



55

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of


- Eastwood Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary

assessment: “Scheduled Ancient Monument present at Greasley and . Conservation Area and 20 Listed Buildings in Eastwood. ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with Engli sh Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage a ssets. ”

Updated information


Consultee Amend text in "Other - further work to re ad: "Underlying coal strata and coal mining legacy issues ". " Add text to further work "Further dialogue with the Coal Authority ".



Officers Within indicative assessment replace “…but opportunities for earlier delivery on several sites with existing planning permission…” with “but opportunities for earlier delivery on several sites with existing planning permission or allocated for housing in the adopted Broxtowe Local Plan."

Clarification

C347 Page 145 Appendix A - Kimberley

Officers Delete “Electricity - Additional 33kV Circuits and new 33kV primary substation at Watnall Potentially - additional 33kV Circuits and new 33kV primary substation in the Stapleford area. Reserved site available” Change to “Electricity - new 33/11kV primary at Watnall required. Included in Western Power programme to be implemented by 2015.” Delete “Included in Western Power programme to be implemented by 2015.”

Updated information


Officers Additional text added “The Gilt Brook runs to the west of Kimberley.”

Clarification


Officers Remove apostrophes – change “SSSI’s” to “SSSIs” and "SINC’s” to “SINCs” Correction


Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary assessment: “There are two Conservation Areas withi n Kimberely and 13 Listed Buildings in the area. ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposal s emerge to preserve and enhance heritage assets. ”

Updated information


Officers Amend text in "Other - further work" to re ad: "Underlying coal strata and coal mining legacy issues ". " Add text to further work "Further dialogue with the Coal Authority ".



Officers Within indicative assessment replace “…but opportunities for earlier delivery on several sites with existing planning permission…” with “but opportunities for earlier delivery on several sites with existing planning permission or allocated for housing in the adopted Broxtowe Local Plan."

Clarification


56

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of


Papplewick Lane

Consultee Clarify information on site ownership for North of Papplewick Lane site to amend information under ownership/developer to read "willing owners positively engaged for majority of the site".

Clarification

C354 Page 148 Appendix A - Papplewick Lane

Consultee Amend Strategic Site Schedule for the North of Papplewick Lane site with regards to summary assessment of transport. Amend 2nd sentence to read 'Site to be accessed via 2 of either Delia, Dorothy, Alison and Marion Avenues "or via Papplewick Lane, depending on whether the site is developed as one or two phases."

Clarification


Officers Delete “Electricity - Additional 33kV circuits and new 33kV primary substation required at Westville.” Change to “Electricity – Update required to existing 33/11vK primary at Calverton, may also require new 33/11kV primary in the area. Depending on phasing new Bulk Supply Point may be required.” Delete “Works to substation programmed by Central Networks for completion by 2015.”

Updated information


Consultee Amend Strategic Site Schedule for the North of Papplewick Lane site with regards to summary assessment of education. Amend 1st sentence to add the words "subject to an assessment demonstrating that the anticipated pupil yield cannot be accommodated in the existing school system through the extension or improvement of existing schools".

Clarification and update


Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary assessment: “Proximity to Site of Special Scientifi c Interest ("Quarry Banks"), Conservation Areas at Linby and Papplewick , Scheduled Ancient Monuments, Historic Parks and Gardens at Ne wstead Abbey and Papplewick Hall, Listed Buildings present in an d around Linby and Papplewick. ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve an d enhance heritage assets. ”

Updated information

C358 Page 152 Appendix A - Top Whighay Farm

Officers Site area amended from “26.9ha ” to “35.6ha ” Correction


57

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of


Top Whighay Farm

Officers Delete “Electricity - Additional 33kV circuits and new 33kV primary substation at Westville.” Change to “Electricity –Uprating Hucknall to 40MVA required. Depending on phasing a new Bulk Supply Point may be required. Uprating works programmed by Western Power for completion by 2015.” Delete “Works programmed by Central Networks for completion by 2015”

Updated information


Officers Change “SINCS” to “SINCs” Correction

C361 Page153 Appendix A - Top Whighay Farm

Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary assessment: “Proximity to Site of Special Scientifi c Interest ("Quarry Banks"), Conservation Area at Linby, Scheduled Anci ent Monuments, Historic Parks and Gardens at Newstead Abbey and Pa pplewick Hall, Listed Buildings present in and around Linby. ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as pr oposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage assets. ”

Updated information


Officers/Consultee Updated plan inserted. Amended to correct site boun dary, clarify extent of proposed housing and employment areas.

Correction

C363 Page 157 Appendix A - Bestwood Village

Officers Delete “Electricity - no abnormal requirements.” Change to “Updating of existing 33/11kV primary at Calverton required may also need a new 33/11kV primary in the area. Depending on phasing a new Bulk Supply Point may be required” “Further dialogue with Western Power and Severn Trent when phasing details emerge.”

Updated information


Consultee Amend text in contamination summary: "No abnormal requirements. Bestwood landfill and various waste licences presen t." Add text to further work: "Appropriate desk top studies/furthe r investigation as required ."



Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary assessment: “Conservation Area, Scheduled Ancient M onument and Listed Buildings present in and around Bestwood Vil lage.” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with Engli sh Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage a ssets. ”

Updated information


58

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of


- Bestwood Village

Consultee New category of "Other " added. New text "Potential coal mining legacy issues ". New text added to further work "Further review a s detailed proposals emerge and further dialogue with the Coal Authority ."


C367 Page 160 Appendix A - Calverton

Officers Delete “Electricity - no abnormal requirements.” Change to “Updating of existing 33/11kV primary at Calverton required may also need a new 33/11kV primary in the area. Depending on phasing a new Bulk Supply Point may be required” Add “Further dialogue with Western Power and Severn Trent when phasing details emerge.”

Updated information


Officers Green Infrastructure change text to “Alternative Natural Green Space”. Correction


Consultee Amend contamination summary: " No abnorma l requirements. Proximity to landfill sites, Calverton Colliery and several s ites with waste management licences. " Add text to further work: "Appropriate desk top studies/further investigation as required ."



Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary assessment: “Proximity to Scheduled Ancient Monumen ts. Conservation Area and Listed Buildings present in a nd around Calverton. ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve an d enhance heritage assets.”

Updated information


Consultee New category of "Other " added. New text "Potential coal mining legacy issues ". New text added to further work "Further review a s detailed proposals emerge and further dialogue with the Coal Authority ."


C372 Page 165 Appendix A - Ravenshead

Officers Delete “Electricity - no abnormal requirements.” Change to “Updating of existing 33/11kV primary at Calverton required may also need a new 33/11kV primary in the area. Depending on phasing a new Bulk Supply Point may be required” Add “Further dialogue with Western Power and Severn Trent when phasing details emerge.”

Updated information

C373 Page 166 Appendix A - Ravenshead

Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary assessment: “Proximity to Historic Park and Garden at Newstead Abbey. Special Character Area between Sheepwalk Lan e and Mansfield Road (A60). Listed Buildings present around Ravensh ead.” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with Engli sh Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage a ssets. ”

Updated information


59

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of


Stanton Tip Officers Delete “Electricity – Additional 33kV Circuits and new 33kV primary substation

at Watnall planned works by Western Power by 2015.” Change to “Electricity – no abnormal requirements” “Further dialogue with Western Power as proposals emerge.”

Updated information

C375 Page 169 Appendix A - Stanton Tip

Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary assessment: “Site is not within a designated Conser vation Area and has no impact upon a designated Conservation Area or he ritage assets. ”

Updated information

C376 Page 172 Appendix A - Waterside

Officers Delete “Electricity - Reinforcement of existing 33kV circuits and two existing 33kV primary Substations.” Change to “Electricity - A new Bulk Supply Point is required in the city centre to relieve load from 3 existing points. A further primary substation may be required depending on phasing and final loads.”

Updated information


Consultee Add text to contamination summary "Proxim ity to Enviroenergy, Eastcroft Energy from Waste Plant and Clinical Wast e Plant ." Add text to further work section "Appropriate desk top studi es/further investigation as required to address contamination and pollution control issues ."



Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary assessment: “Proximity to Station Conservation Area and Colwick Hall and remains of Church and grave yard of John the Ba ptist, several Listed Buildings and structures present in the area ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Herita ge as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage assets. ”

Updated information

C379 Page 178 and 179

Appendix A - Southside

Officers Within Indicative Assessment change “Through out” to “Throughout” Correction

C380 Page 179 Appendix A - Southside

Officers Within Electricity section delete “Reinforcement of existing 33kV circuits and two existing 33kV primary Substations.” Change to “Electricity – A new Bulk Supply Point is required in the city centre to relieve load from 3 existing points. A further primary substation may be required depending on phasing and final loads. Opportunities for connection to District Heating Network” Add to further work “Early dialogue with Western Power required re phasing, depending on planned works investment costs may be met by Western Power”

Updated information


Officers Add new text to utilities summary: "Waste Water – no abnormal requirements depending on phasing. Water Supply – no abnormal requirements depending on phasing. Gas – no abnormal requirements. IT – no abnormal

Updated information


60

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason requirements."


Consultee Add text to contamination summary: " Pro ximity to Enviroenergy, Eastcroft Energy from Waste Plan and Clinical Waste Plant. " Add text to further work: "Site specific investigations as det ailed proposals emerge to address pollution control issues. "



Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary assessment: “Incorporates part of the Station Conse rvation Area and adjoins the Canal Conservation Area, several Listed Buildings present. ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue w ith English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritag e assets. ”


C384 Page 182 Appendix A - Eastside

Officers Within electricity section delete “Reinforcement of existing 33kV circuits and two existing 33kV primary Substations” Changed to “Electricity – A new Bulk Supply Point is required in the city centre to relieve load from 3 existing points. A further primary substation may be required depending on phasing and final loads.”

Updated information


Officers Waste Water section change ‘requires’ to ‘required’ Correction


Consultee Add text to contamination summary: "Proxi mity to Enviroenergy, Eastcroft Energy from Waste Plant and Clinical Wast e Plant ."



Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary assessment: “Proximity to 4 Conservation Areas and several Listed Buildings. ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve an d enhance heritage assets. ”



Officers In indicative assessment change “Through out” to “Throughout” Correction

C389 Page 189 Midland Mainline

Appendix B Officers Midland Mainline Speed Improvements and Electrification. "No commitment" changed to "Listed as a priority scheme by Govt awaiting funding approval." Funding source changed from "tbc" to "Central govt via Network Rail." Lead changed from "tbc" to "Network Rail". Timescale for delivery changed from "tbc" to "6-10 years"

Updated information

C390 Page 189 A52 Appendix B Consultee Updated info rmation on A52 improvements In response to


61

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason LA "RBC NCC relevant to all" Description "A52 Junction Improvements ( within Rushcliffe between A6200 Derby Road and Bingham) " Progress "Planning Application /No commitment" Estimated Cost "15,000 - 18,000 " Funding Source "tbc Developer/CIL/HA "

consultee comments

C391 Page 189 M1 junctions

Appendix B Consultee Additional row for M1 junction improvements Nature Important Strategic Infrastructure Category Transport LA BBC Relevant to all Description/Infrastructure Requirements Junction mo dification/traffic management M1 junctions 25, 26 and 27 (also relevan t to Erewash and Ashfield which are outside the plan area) Progress No commitment Est. Cost £k tbc Funding Source Developer/CIL/HA Lead HA Timescale (years) 0-5 tbc


C392 Page 189 Eastside

Appendix B Officers "No commitment" changed to "funding secured". Est cost changed from "4,000 5,000" to "5,000", funding secured new text added "5,000" , funding source changed from "S106 LTP" to "TIF 2". Timescale changed from "tbc" to "0-5"

Updated information

C393 Page 191-197 Appendix C Officers Trajectories within Appendix C amended to take account of update d information See separate section showing replacement trajectori es for each Council.

Footnotes for Gedling and Nottingham City amended

Gedling

Footnotes

“** All suitable sites have been included to give a theoretical maximum

Correction


62

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason number of dwellings that can be provided in Gedling Borough. This theoretical figure is 8,330 dwellings (i.e. 12.97% higher than the housing target of 7,250). The ann ual projected completions have then been reduced by 12.97% to provide annual completions projections to deliver t he housing target of 7,250. Final proposed figures are shown in Policy 2.”

“** All suitable sites have been included to give a theoretical maximum number of dwellings that can be provided in Gedling Borough.

Past completions figure is 275 for 2011/12. The ann ual projected completions for the urban area and villages for 201 2-2028 have then been reduced to provide annual completions projecti ons to deliver the housing target of 7,250.

Final proposed figures are shown in Policy 2.

Proposed figures in Policy 2 add up to 7,243 dwelli ngs. Additional 7 dwellings have been added to windfall allowance fig ure (in 2027/28) to round total up to 7,250 dwellings. ”

Nottingham City

“Although windfall sites are not included until aft er the first ten years, it is very likely, based on the City’s past performanc e, that a significant number of windfall sites will come forward and be d eveloped before then. This wi ll provide a contingency against lack of delivery o f housing on other sites. ”

C394 Page 200 Appendix D Officers Add “A” at the start of Gedling's first “Priority”. Correction

C395 Page 201 Appendix D Consultee Add ticks to Pol icies 1-8, 13 and 16 In response to consultee comments


63

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C396 Page 204 Appendix E Consultee Polices ENV14 & ENV15 status amended to saved (Yes) with the

following reason adding "NPPF (paras 132 -141) applies Policy guidance goes beyond that contained within NPPF "


C397 Page 208 Appendix E Officers Amend text to read "…ENV15 New Development in a Cconservation Aarea ..."

Correction

C398 Page 208 Appendix E Officers Amend text for policies to read "ENV18 Demolition of a lListed bBuilding, ENV19 Extension or alteration of a lListed bBuilding, ENV20 Change of use of a lListed bBuilding, ENV21 Setting of a lListed bBuilding"

Correction

C399 Page 210 Appendix E Officers “Briefs” remove the apostrophe with regard to H2 Correction C400 Page 215 Appendix E Officers Replace “Links” with “links” in the reason for Policy H1 and H5 Correction C401 Page 215-220 Appendix E Officers Schedules updated to remove reference to PPG/Ss. Correction/Update C402 Page 219 Appendix E Officers Amend title to "NE1 Nature Conservation - SSSIs" Correction C403 Glossary,

AMRs Glossary Officers Amend text to read “Authority Monitoring Report (AMR): Part of the Local

Plan. A report submitted to the government produced by local planning authorities assessing the progress and effectiveness of their Local Plan.”

Correction

C404 Glossary, Article 4 Directions

Glossary Officers Replace “Article 4 Directions” with Article 4 Direction”. As the term was given in the plural, but the definition is in the singular.

Correction

C405 Glossary, B2 Glossary Officers Add “an” before “industrial process”. Correction C406 Glossary, BAP Glossary Officers Start with “An” rather than “is an” Correction C407 Glossary,

Centres of Neighbourhood Importance

Glossary Officers Addition text added to term to read "Centres of Neighbourhood Importance: These typically consist of a parade of shops which serve a local community, and may include a small supermarket."

Clarification

C408 Glossary, Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL)

Glossary Officers Replace “s106” with “S106” Consistency

C409 Glossary, Comparison Goods

Glossary Officers Start term with “Items” rather than “Are Items” Correction

C410 Glossary, Convenience

Glossary Officers Start term with “Everyday” rather than “Are everyday” Correction


64

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason Goods

C411 Glossary, Countryside

Glossary Officers At the end, “areas” rather than “Area”, to match the actual entry). Correction

C412 Glossary, Development Plan

Glossary Officers Remove the reference to “the London Plan” as has no relevance to the Core Strategies. Also move the text “It is the government’s clear policy intention to revoke the regional strategies outside of London, subject to the outcome of the environmental assessments that are currently being undertaken.” to the term “Regional Plan/Regional Spatial Strategy” as this text relates more to that term

Update

C413 Glossary, Economic Development (new term)

Glossary Consultee New Glossary entry: Economic Development: Development, including those within the B Use Classes, public and community uses and main town c entre uses (but excluding housing development).


C414 Glossary, EM Regional Plan

Glossary Officers Add “Plan/” after “Regional” (to match the actual entry). Correction

C415 Glossary, Employment Sector

Glossary Officers Amend title to "Employment sSector" Consistency

C416 Glossary, Edge of Centre

Glossary Officers In the 2nd line, amend to “from “ rather than “of” Correction

C417 Glossary, Greater Nottingham

Glossary Officers Use lower case for “Pplan Aarea” and at the end of the term, use “section” rather than “para”

Consistency

C418 Glossary, Heritage Asset

Glossary Officers Amend title to "Heritage aAsset" Consistency

C419 Glossary, High Technology Industry

Glossary Officesr Amend title to "High Technology iIndustry" Correction

C420 Glossary, Houses in Multiple Occupation (new term)

Glossary Consultee Add new glossary entry: “Houses in Multiple Occupation – Use Class C4 and l arger ‘sui generis’ residential units with 7 or more occupiers sharing basic amenities. ”



65

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C421 Glossary, IDP Glossary Officers Amend to “Sets” with a capital at the start Consistency C422 Glossary,

Legal Compliance (new term)

Glossary Consultee New Glossary entry: "Legal Compliance: As part of the process of prepar ing a Core Strategy, the document is examined by the Planning Inspectora te to make sure that it is legal and sound. A plan is considered l egal when it complies with the various regulations that govern how it sho uld be prepared. Key issues the Inspector will look at include: • Whether it is in the Local Development Scheme; • Whether community consultation was carried out in accordance with the Statement of Community Involvement; • Whether the requirements of the relevant Regulati ons have been followed; • Whether the appropriate notifications have been m ade; • Whether a Sustainability Appraisal assessing soci al, environmental and economic factors has been done and made public; • Whether the Aligned Core Strategy has regard to t he Sustainable Community Strategies for the areas it covers; and • Whether the requirements of the Duty to Cooperate have been met "


C423 Glossary, Local Plans

Glossary Officers Remove “s” from “Local Plans”. Consistency

C424 Glossary, Main Built Up Area of Nottingham

Glossary Officers Amend the text to read “The contiguous main built up area of Nottingham” and add "(Rushcilffe)" and "(Erewash)" after “West Bridgeford” and “Long Eaton” for clarification.

Consistency

C425 Glossary, Main Town Centre Uses

Glossary Officers Amend title to read "Main Town Centre uUses" Consistency

C426 Glossary, NPPF

Glossary Officers Capitalise “nNeighbourhood pPlans” Consistency

C427 Glossary, Neighbourhood Plans

Glossary Officers Capitalise and Remove “s” from “nNeighbourhood pPlans” Consistency

C428 Glossary, Neighbourhood Plans

Glossary Officers Amend text to read “made under the 1990 Town & Country Planning Act, as amended by the 2011 Localism Act Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004”

Correction

C429 Glossary, PINS Glossary Officers Remove capital “S” in “Ssound” as not necessary, also add abbreviation of Consistency


66

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason “PINS”

C430 Glossary, Primary Shopping Area (new term)

Glossary Consultee Add new glossary entry: “Primary Shopping Area: Defined area where retail d evelopment is concentrated (generally comprising the primary and those secondary frontages which are adjoining and closely related t o the primary shopping frontage). ”


C431 Glossary, Primary Shopping Frontage

Glossary Officers Amend text to read “Primary frontages are likely to Consist of…” Consistency

C432 Glossary (Principal Urban Area (PUA))

Glossary Officers Amend text to read “The contiguous main built up area of Nottingham …” Consistency

C433 Glossary, Regional Plan/Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS)

Glossary Officers Amend text to read "Strategic plan for the Region that Development Pla n Documents had ve to be in general conformity with. The East Midlands Regional Plan (RSS) was issued in March 2009 . The East Midlands Regional Plan was adopted in March 2009 and on the 6th July 2010 the Secretary of State announced the revocation of Regional Strategies. On the 20th March 2013 the Secretary of State laid in Parliament a st atutory instrument to revoke the Regional Strategy for the East Midlands. This came into force on 12th April 2013 as such the East Midlands Region al Plan no longer forms part of the Development Plan ."

RS being revoked

C434 Glossary, Regional Plan/Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS)

Glossary Officers Amend text to read "Part of the former RSS. Aimed to integrate land-use planning and transport planning to steer new development into mo re sustainable locations, reduce the need to travel and enable jou rneys to be made by more sustainable modes of transport."

RS being revoked

C435 Glossary, Rural Areas

Glossary Officers Amend title to "Rural aAreas" Consistency


67

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C436 Glossary,

Rural Exception Sites

Glossary Officers Amend title to "Rural eException sSites" Consistency

C437 Glossary, Safeguarded Land (White Land)

Glossary Officers Amend text to "Land outside of Ma in Urban Areas and Named Settlements specifically excluded from the Green Be lt but safeguarded from development unless a future local plan is adop ted that allocates it for development ."


C438 Glossary, SANGS

Glossary Officers Amend title to “Suitable Alternative Natural Green Spaces” Consistency

C439 Glossary, Secondary Shopping Frontage

Glossary Officers Amend text to “Secondary frontages pProvide…” Consistency

C440 Glossary, Section 106 Agreement (s106)

Glossary Officers Replace “s106” with “S106” throughout term (3 occasions) Consistency

C441 Glossary, Sequential Test/Approach

Glossary Officers Use “or” rather than “of” in the 1st line Correction

C442 Glossary, SSSI Glossary Officers Amend to read “A sites designated by …” Consistency

C443 Glossary, SPA Glossary Officers Amend to read “An Aarea which have has …” Consistency

C444 Glossary, Soundness (new term)

Glossary Consultee Delete glossary term "Soundness tests" and replace with term for "Soundness" "Soundness tests: Criteria which the Aligned Core S trategy must meet if it is to be found sound by the Planning Inspectorat e. Only Core Strategies which pass the test of soundness can be adopted. " Add new glossary entry: “Soundness: As part of the process of preparing a C ore Strategy, the document is examined by the Planning Inspectorate t o make sure it is



68

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason legal and sound. There are four 'tests of soundnes s' - ‘positively prepared’, ‘justified’, ‘effective’ and ‘consistent with national policy’ as explained in paragraph 182 of the NPPF. "Positively prepared - the plan should be prepared based on a strategy which seeks to meet objectively assessed developmen t and infrastructure requirements, including unmet requir ements from neighbouring authorities where it is reasonable to do so and consistent with achieving sustainable development. Justified - the plan should be the most appropriat e strategy, when considered against the reasonable alternatives, bas ed on proportionate evidence. Effective - the plan should be deliverable over its period and based on effective joint working on cross-boundary strategic priorities; and Consistent with national policy - the plan should e nable the delivery of sustainable development in accordance with the poli cies in the Framework. "

C445 Glossary, Student Households (new term)

Glossary Officers/Consultee Add additional glossary term: “Student Households: Ho useholds which can claim student council tax exemption including t hose within halls of residence."

Additional term added for clarification

C446 Glossary, SuDS

Glossary Officers Rename title to “Sustainable Urban Drainage System (SUuDS)” as this is the more widely used title. Also alter text to “… new and existing developments with respect to of surface water drainage discharge”

Correction

C447 Glossary, SPD Glossary Officers Amend term to “Supplementary Planning Document (SPD): A Ddocuments which adds further detail to the policies in the Local Plan. They cCan be used to provide further guidance for development on specific sites, or on particular issues, such as design, and capable of being a material consideration in planning decisions but does are not form part of the development plan.” for clarify.

Correction

C448 Glossary, Sustainable Communities

Glossary Officers Remove the source as not provided this detail elsewhere for other terms ie delete “(Source DCLG)”

Correction


69

Ref Reference

point in doc Main

section Source of

change Details Reason C449 Glossary, SCS Glossary Officers Delete “the” before “economic”. Correction

C450 Glossary, Town Centre

Glossary Officers Amend to “proposals” the second line to give the correct term Correction

C451 Glossary, Windfall Site

Glossary Officers Amend term to “Windfall Site: A Ssites which have has not been specifically identified as available in the Local Plan process. They nNormally comprises a previously-developed sites that have has unexpectedly become available.”

Correction

C452 Glossary Zero Carbon - new term

Glossary Officers Add to the glossary term for “Zer o Carbon”. Zero Carbon: High standards of energy efficiency for the fabric of ne w buildings to reduce regulated emissions so when coupled with other carb on reduction measures, including the provision of renewable ener gy generation ideally on site (or off site) to reduce carbon emis sions to zero. The definition excludes a requirement to mitigate emiss ions from energy-using equipment inside the home, such as television s and washing machines collectively known as unregulated emission s.

Clarification

C453 Key Diagram Diagrams Officers • ‘Main Built up Area’ added • ‘North of Stapleford’ after Field Farm added • ‘Change Sub Regional Green Infrastructure’ to ‘St rategic Green Infrastructure’ • Key amended to “Area of Future Housing and Employ ment Development (if Development Commences in the Plan P eriod) • Key amended to "Key Settlements Identified for Gr owth" • Toton site added to the diagram • Proposed HS2 preferred route and station added to the diagram

Updated information


70

Amendments to Diagrams The following diagrams have been amended and details of the changes are described below with the replacement diagrams shown later in this document. All other documents remain as they were originally published in June 2012. Plan 3.3 Green Infrastructure in Greater Nottingham Change: •••• ‘Sub Regional Green Infrastructure Corridors’ title changed to ‘Strategic

Green Infrastructure’ Appendix A: Field Farm Changes: •••• Amended plan to show updated pedestrian route. Appendix A: Toton •••• Plan inserted •••• Schedule inserted Appendix A: Top Whighay Farm Changes: •••• Boundary has been corrected and correct distribution of proposed uses. Key Diagram Changes: •••• ‘Main Built up Area’ added •••• ‘North of Stapleford’ after Field Farm added •••• ‘Change Sub Regional Green Infrastructure’ title to ‘Strategic Green

Infrastructure’ •••• Key amended to ‘Area of Future Housing and Employment Development

(if Development Commences in the Plan Period)’ •••• Key amended to ‘Key Settlements Identified for Growth’ •••• Toton added with Orange square (Employment) and red border

(Sustainable Urban Extensions and other Strategic Sites) •••• HS2 Preferred Route and HS2 Proposed Station Hub added to the

diagram


71


72


73


74


75


76

New Schedule The new schedule for the Land in the Vicinity of the Proposed HS2 Station at Toton to be inserted into Appendix A within the Broxtowe section along with the diagram. Land in the vicinity of the proposed HS2 station at Toton (Broxtowe) Site Summary ACS Designation Strategic Location

Timescale 6 -15 years

Site Area Approx 73 ha

Housing Units To be determined through the Broxtowe Allocations Development Plan Document.

Employment Uses To be determined through the Broxtowe Allocations Development Plan Document.

Other Uses Open space and additional land for community facilities including education and limited local retail provision.

Ownership/Developer Planning Application submitted on part of the land. Willing owners positively engaged to meet the needs of HS2.

IDP Constraints/Requirements Summary Infrastructure Summary Assessment Further Work

Transport

Integrated transport package required. Requirement for a subsidised bus service incorporating Banks Road estate, Stapleford, Beeston and the City Centre. Access improvements to the strategic road network to include new access points off Toton/ Stapleford Lane. Transport modelling undertaken for a location west of Toton/Stapleford Lane for up to 1000 homes has been carried out. This indicates that the following mitigation works may be required including:

Internal roads layout to be prepared. Further discussions with NET to ensure no conflict with the park and ride facility. Commence dialogue with HS2 to ensure no conflict with access arrangements including alternative access to the station and safeguarded extended tram to HS2 station. Ongoing dialogue with highway authorities and Highways Agency to confirm detailed requirements as set out in the Transport Background Paper Addendum May 2013.


77

Infrastructure Summary Assessment Further Work A52 (T)/B6003 junction (Bardills Roundabout):

• Third traffic lane on the A52 (T) east approach • A 3 lane circulatory carriageway connecting

the A52 (T) east approach to the A52(T) west exit

• A 3 lane exit of the A52 (T) west exit • Extension to the A52(T) west approach • M1 Junction 25 • Additional 60m lane on the A52(T) east off-slip

to provide dedicated left turn along with extended 3 lane provision

Mitigation impacts to the following County Road junctions:

• Stapleford Lane / Darley Avenue • Stapleford Lane / Woodstock Road and • Stapleford Lane / Swiney Way.

Travel Planning with the following objectives: • Achieve the minimum number of car

movements to and from the development, • Reduce the need to travel to and from the site, • Address the access needs of site users, by

supporting walking cycling and public transport,

• Provide adequately for those with mobility difficulties.

Public Transport Support: • Contribution to fund extension of existing bus

services Safeguarding NET extension:

• NET route safeguarded through the site


78

Infrastructure Summary Assessment Further Work Road Safety Audit.

Utilities

Electricity – overhead power lines to be rerouted underground beneath the roads on site and a new terminal pylon located in the SW corner of the site. Western Power have been consulted and have no objection in principle to doing this. Further work required to confirm most appropriate WWTW. Water supply – no abnormal requirements subject to phasing. There is no objection in principle form Severn Trent to the planning application for 775 homes on the west of Toton Lane IT – No abnormal requirements.

Opportunities for extension to existing CHP facilities. Further dialogue with Western Power and Severn Trent as detailed proposals emerge

Flooding and Flood Risk

Site within Flood Zone 1. No significant flood risk. No significant risk for fluvial sources and therefore no specific mitigation required. Potential increase in surface water run off requiring mitigation from attenuation storage and on site SuDS provision.

Ongoing dialogue with the Environment Agency to ensure suitable mitigation methods are adopted.

Health Land set aside for health facilities if required Planning application contains a site for a medical centre. Further dialogue with PCT/CCG. Contributions to be agreed as part of S106 discussions.

Education Provision

Detailed assessment of education requirement suggests development would generate a need for a new primary school and extended secondary school

Proceed with development of a Master plan for the education provision. Continued dialogue with the council, education authority, developers and the planning department regarding S106


79

Infrastructure Summary Assessment Further Work provision would be required. Land has been set aside for a nursery school if required.

contributions.

Emergency Services No abnormal requirements Further dialogue as plans are finalised.

Waste Management No known abnormal requirements. Further dialogue as plans are finalised.

Community Services

Good range of town centre facilities available at Stapleford Town Centre. Excellent potential (NET) access to range of facilities at Beeston and Nottingham City Centre. Land set aside for a community building if required.

Further details to be developed as part of ongoing discussions. Local centre to be created incorporating offices, pub, restaurant/pub, education space, medical plot, limited local retail provision and day nursery.

Green Infrastructure

Extensive Green Infrastructure to be provided. Potential loss of hedgerows, damage to retained trees during construction, loss of roosting opportunities and bird migration patterns, degradation of local nature reserve through increased public activity from development. Opportunities for creation of new green infrastructure and swales which could offset negative impacts. Increased long term opportunities for wildlife and biodiversity and habitat creation.

Strategy to protect/enhance and or relocate as part of ongoing studies. Opportunities to extend GI network.

Contamination

Potential contaminants from former agricultural uses on the site. Potential impact on the human receptors on the site from contaminants from Toton Sidings, the sewage works and the electricity substation.

Gas monitoring over a 3 month period and topsoil chemical tests should be carried out to further inform remediation strategy.

Heritage Assets No significant heritage issues.


80

Infrastructure Summary Assessment Further Work

Other

Following HS2 announcement strong potential for positive social-economic benefits for the wider area. No significant demolition issues associated with the development.

Strategy and detailed assessment of HS2 requirements required to be incorporated into Masterplan. Commencement of discussions as detailed proposals of HS2 emerge. Joint-working with HS2 and NET.

Indicative Assessment

This strategic location is a green field site close to the existing urban area with existing links to Stapleford Town Centre and potential excellent future transport links to Nottingham City Centre and the rest of the UK/Europe. The site can be developed to reflect garden city principles and maintain the separate identities of Stapleford and Toton. Delivery is expected to be within 6-10 years of the plan period. A planning application has been submitted for land on the west side of Toton Lane and is under consideration and negotiations have reached an advanced stage. No irresolvable constraints have been identified. If built development takes place on the east of Toton Lane then this should be to the South of the proposed NET route, with this route and park and ride used as a long term defensible Green Belt boundary. The announcement from HS2 to locate their preferred station at Toton strongly contributes to the strategic importance of the site. Continued joint working with NET, the Highways Agency and the commencement of dialogue with HS2 will be essential.


81

Trajectories The trajectories for the three Council have also been updated and replacement ones are shown in this document. Please also note revised footnotes for Gedling and Nottingham City.


82

Broxtowe

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2001/02

2002/03

2003/04

2004/05

2005/06

2006/07

2007/08

2008/09

2009/10

2010/11

2011/12

2012/13

2013/14

2014/15

2015/16

2016/17

2017/18

2018/19

2019/20

2020/21

2021/22

2022/23

2023/24

2024/25

2025/26

2026/27

2027/28

Dw

ellin

gs

Past Completions (net) Total Projected Completions (net) PLAN - Annual Housing Target


83

2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2011/28

Past Completions (net) 0

Boots/Severn Trent 80 80 80 105 105 25 25 25 25 550

Field Farm 50 100 100 100 100 450

Awsworth Allocations 30 33 33 30 30 30 30 30 246

Awsworth SHLAA sites 1 19 18 25 27 14 104

Brinsley allocations 11 11 11 11 11 21 21 21 21 22 161

Brinsley SHLAA sites 3 10 3 1 1 5 5 5 6 39

Eastwood allocations 30 30 30 30 30 40 39 39 39 39 346

Eastwood SHLAA sites 98 17 73 94 123 123 126 100 80 51 47 22 954

Kimberley allocations 10 10 10 10 11 53 53 53 53 263

Kimberley SHLAA sites 1 30 18 13 32 32 16 36 44 45 40 6 8 8 8 337

Nottingham Urban Area allocations 26 26 26 26 26 174 174 174 174 174 1000

Nottingham Urban Area SHLAA sites 40 63 101 85 90 98 64 175 213 206 161 79 11 11 12 13 13 1435

Other sites deliverable by 2028 (taken from Strateg ic Housing Land Availability) - in urban area

0

Other sites deliverable by 2028 (taken from Strateg ic Housing Land Availability) - other villages

1 1 2

Windfall allowance after 10 years 60 60 60 60 60 300

Demolitions 0 0 -33 0 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -35

Total Projected Completions (net) 140 113 239 314 371 380 320 497 524 492 463 320 422 426 427 390 314 6152

Cumulative Completions 0 113 352 666 1177 1557 1877 2374 2898 3390 3853 4173 4595 5021 5448 5838 6152

PLAN - Annual Housing Target 140 110 320 320 320 320 320 460 460 460 460 460 400 400 400 400 400 6150

PLAN - Housing Target (cumulative) 140 250 570 890 1210 1530 1850 2310 2770 3230 3690 4150 4550 4950 5350 5750 6150 6150

MONITOR - No. dwellings above or below cumulative housing target 0 3 -78 -84 -33 27 27 64 128 160 163 23 45 71 98 88 2

MANAGE - Annual housing target taking account of past/projected completions 362 384 402 414 422 414 418 427 420 407 394 383 395 389 376 351 312


84

Gedling

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2001/02

2002/03

2003/04

2004/05

2005/06

2006/07

2007/08

2008/09

2009/10

2010/11

2011/12

2012/13

2013/14

2014/15

2015/16

2016/17

2017/18

2018/19

2019/20

2020/21

2021/22

2022/23

2023/24

2024/25

2025/26

2026/27

2027/28

Dw

ellin

gs

Past Completions (net) Total Projected Completions (net) PLAN - Annual Housing Target


85

2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2011/28

Past Completions (net) 275 275

Top Wighay Farm 40 40 40 40 40 100 140 140 140 140 140 1000

North of Papplewick Lane 15 60 90 90 90 90 90 75 600

Gedling Colliery/Chase Farm 0

Bestwood Village 30 2 10 25 60 53 50 53 50 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 47 1010

Calverton 16 33 70 77 41 37 14 6 151 335 335 335 269 100 63 40 40 1962

Ravenshead 42 27 25 100 7 3 14 55 96 80 77 36 562

Other sites deliverable by 2028 (taken from Strateg ic Housing Land Availability) - in urban area

183 204 261 459 350 237 182 238 210 133 83 63 50 50 1 1 2705

Other sites deliverable by 2028 (taken from Strateg ic Housing Land Availability) - other villages

4 16 11 20 4 13 8 33 74 60 40 20 20 20 20 363

Windfall allowance after 10 years 40 40 40 40 47 207

Demolitions 0

Total Projected Capacity (net) ** 282 377 696 522 433 398 515 711 828 740 644 609 440 354 311 274 8134

Total Projected Completions (net) 258 341 628 475 391 363 462 606 673 593 513 501 371 294 262 244 6975

Cumulative Completions 275 533 874 1502 1977 2368 2731 3193 3799 4472 5065 5578 6079 6450 6744 7006 7250 7250

PLAN - Annual Housing Target 275 275 440 440 440 440 440 570 570 570 570 570 330 330 330 330 330 7250

PLAN - Housing Target (cumulative) 275 550 990 1430 1870 2310 2750 3320 3890 4460 5030 5600 5930 6260 6590 6920 7250

MONITOR - No. dwellings above or below cumulative housing target 0 -17 -116 72 107 58 -19 -127 -91 12 35 -22 149 190 154 86 0

MANAGE - Annual housing target taking account of past/projected completions 426 436 448 455 442 439 444 452 451 431 397 364 334 293 267 253 244 0 Footnotes ** All suitable sites have been included to give a theoretical maximum number of dwellings that can be provided in Gedling Borough. Past completions figure is 275 for 2011/12. The annual projected completions for the urban area and villages for 2012-2028 have then been reduced to provide annual completions projections to deliver the housing target of 7,250. Final proposed figures are shown in Policy 2. Proposed figures in Policy 2 add up to 7,243 dwellings. Additional 7 dwellings have been added to windfall allowance figure (in 2027/28) to round total up to 7,250 dwellings.


86

Nottingham City

Housing Trajectory - Nottingham City (net completio ns)

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

2001/2

2002/3

2003/4

2004/5

2005/6

2006/7

2007/8

2008/9

2009/10

2010/11

2011/12

2012/13

2013/14

2014/15

2015/16

2016/17

2017/18

2018/19

2019/20

2020/21

2021/22

2022/23

2023/24

2024/25

2025/26

2026/27

2027/28

Past Completions Projected completions (net) PLAN - Annual Housing Target


87

2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2011/28Past Completions 422 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Waterside (3,000) 6 35 29 30 162 308 303 500 677 508 427 2,985Boots Campus (600) 100 100 100 100 100 100 600Stanton Tip (500) 41 62 62 62 63 63 63 84 500Other sites deliverable by 2028 (taken from Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment)

744 1,014 1,348 898 867 879 1,159 1,093 950 642 636 554 415 276 395 400 12,271

Windfall allowance 100 100 100 100 100 150 150 180 180 180 180 190 1,710Demolitions -239 -269 -288 -178 -30 -30 -30 -30 -30 -30 -30 -30 -30 -30 -30 -30 -1,334

Projected completions (net) - 505 745 1,060 720 937 955 1,264 1,192 1,191 1,086 1,226 1,169 1,228 1,266 1,116 1,071 16,732

Cumulative Completions 422 927 1,672 2,733 3,453 4,390 5,344 6,609 7,801 8,992 10,078 11,304 12,473 13,701 14,967 16,083 17,154 17,154

PLAN - Annual Housing Target 475 475 880 880 880 880 880 1,190 1,190 1,190 1,190 1,190 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 17,150

PLAN - Housing Target (cumulative) 475 950 1,830 2,710 3,590 4,470 5,350 6,540 7,730 8,920 10,110 11,300 12,470 13,640 14,810 15,980 17,150 17,150

MONITOR - No. dwellings above or below cumulative housing target -53 -23 -158 23 -137 -80 -6 69 71 72 -32 4 3 61 157 103 4 4

MANAGE - Annual housing target taking account of past/projected completions 1,009 1,046 1,082 1,106 1,109 1,141 1,160 1,181 1,171 1,169 1,165 1,179 1,169 1,169 1,150 1,091 1,067 - Although the deliverable sites are those included in the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA), other sites may be identified in the course of the preparation of the Local Plan (Land and Planning Policies document). Likewise, the Local Plan preparation process may result in some of the SHLAA sites not being taken forward as allocations. Purpose-built student units (dwellings) are included in the figures, including the Aligned Core Strategies strategic allocation, in line with current Department for Communities and Local Government definitions