49
Simon Nielsen Head of Strategic Analysis Transport for London Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Simon Nielsen  Head of Strategic AnalysisTransport for London

Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Page 2: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Strategic Analysis

Strategic Analysis

Spatial Planning

Projects

Partnerships

Transport Strategy

City PlanningTfL

Page 3: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Past trends

Future forecasts

Strategic Analysis – analysing past trends to inform future forecasts

Page 4: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Tomorrow, another yesterday?

Page 5: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Page 6: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

The wellbeing of a turkey

Days50 100 1500

Source: Nicholas Taleb / Bertrand Russell

Page 7: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty
Page 8: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

The wellbeing of a turkey

Days50 100 1500

Source: Nicholas Taleb / Bertrand Russell

Page 9: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

The wellbeing of a turkey

Days50 100 1500

Source: Nicholas Taleb / Bertrand Russell

Christmas

Page 10: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

Page 11: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

The past doesn’t always predict the future

Page 12: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

 ‐

 2,000,000

 4,000,000

 6,000,000

 8,000,000

 10,000,000

 12,000,000

1801 1851 1901 1951 2001 2051Inner London Outer London Greater London

Lond

on’s po

pulatio

n

Page 13: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

WW2

 ‐

 2,000,000

 4,000,000

 6,000,000

 8,000,000

 10,000,000

 12,000,000

1801 1851 1901 1951 2001 2051Inner London Outer London Greater London

Lond

on’s po

pulatio

n

Page 14: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

 ‐

 2,000,000

 4,000,000

 6,000,000

 8,000,000

 10,000,000

 12,000,000

1801 1851 1901 1951 2001 2051Inner London Outer London Greater London

��

Closure of the docks 

Lond

on’s po

pulatio

n

Page 15: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

 ‐

 2,000,000

 4,000,000

 6,000,000

 8,000,000

 10,000,000

 12,000,000

1801 1851 1901 1951 2001 2051Inner London Outer London Greater London

��

City deregulation

Lond

on’s po

pulatio

n

Page 16: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

 ‐

 2,000,000

 4,000,000

 6,000,000

 8,000,000

 10,000,000

 12,000,000

1801 1851 1901 1951 2001 2051Inner London Outer London Greater London

 ‐

 2,000,000

 4,000,000

 6,000,000

 8,000,000

 10,000,000

 12,000,000

1801 1851 1901 1951 2001 2051Inner London Outer London Greater London

��

Lond

on’s po

pulatio

n

Page 17: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

There are signs of change...

Page 18: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130In

dex:

200

0 =

100

All trips made in London London daytime population

Page 19: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty
Page 20: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty
Page 21: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty
Page 22: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Economic uncertainty

Travel behaviour change

New business models 

A ‘perfect storm’

Page 23: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

In the past, we have used sensitivity tests

Page 24: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

2011: 25 million trips

2031: 30 million trips

‘Low car’

‘High car’

‘High car’ and ‘low car’ scenarios

Page 25: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

A. Spatial radical changeLand use patterns change

C. Global economic slowdownFall in population and employment & changing 

nature of growth

D. Technology radical changeAutonomous vehicles, behavioural change, maximising network

B. Economic radical changeStructural change in the economy

Core reference Case (GLA central case &standard economic 

assumptions)

Sensitivity 2 Low growth

Low population, employment and economic 

growth

Sensitivity 4 Reduction in discretionary 

travel

Sensitivity 1 High population, employment & 

economic growth

Sensitivity 3aNo decline in car ownership 

Sensitivity 3bFuel price increases

Radical Change

Sensitivity

Core Ref Case

The ‘wheel of uncertainty’

Page 26: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

A Scenario Planning approach takes into account multiple intersecting uncertainties

Page 27: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Aim: Challenge our assumptions about the future and help us to embrace uncertainty in our plans

Page 28: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Scoping

Factor research

Interviews

Workshops

Quantification

Scenario planning approach

Page 29: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

Scoping

Factor research

Interviews

Workshops

Quantification

Scenario planning approach

Page 30: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Contextual Environment

Transactional Environment

GLA Group

DfT

Boroughs

Network Rail

Residents

Data users

Private transport operatorsSuppliers

Developers

Emergency services

Freightoperators

Unions

Geopolitics

Other European

Cities

MPs/ Councillors

Academics

Lobby/ Interest groupsInternational

finance

Aviation

Demographics

Health

Climate Legalisation

EnvironmentSocial values

Tourism

Landowners

Technology

Immigration Macroeconomics

EnergyTrade

��

TfL’s wider context

Page 31: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

Scoping

Factor research

Interviews

Workshops

Quantification

Scenario planning approach

Page 32: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

Freight & servicing

Disposable income

Attitudesto

environment

London’s place in

the world

Ways of working

Living in London

Emerging Business models

London’s place in the UK

Culture and

values

The Environment

DevolutionRegional funding

Domestic migration

National inequalities

Perceptions of safety and crime

Connectivity

24/7 City

London’s workforce

Gig economy

Employment sectors

Skills

Redistributive policy

Taxation

Flexible working

Daytimepopulation

Transportcosts

Employment agglomeration

Employment rate

Artificial intelligence

Greenhousegas

emissions

Climate change

Air quality

Majorcatastrophe Extreme

weather

Water security

Energy resources

Agriculture

Electrification

Biodiversity

Environmental regulation

Waste

National borders

Productivity

Economic growth

Geopoliticaltensions

Balance of Trade Trade

warsCyber security

Global financial

crisis

Global City

status

Air travel

Immigration

Attitudesto automation

Sharing culture

Attitudesto tech

Data protection

Foodculture

Shoppingculture

Online deliveries

Leisuretime

IdentitySocial

interaction

Social concerns

Internet of things

Demandresponsive

transit

Customerinformation

Automation

High Speed

rail

Privatisation

Open data

UnmannedArial

Vehicles

Micro mobility

Regulation

Ride hailing

Population growth

Ageing society

Accessibility

Physical activity

Age mix

Cost of living

Family structure

Quality of life

Social inequality

City structure

Frequency of travel

Mental health

Social disorder

Congestion

Crowding Health

Planning framework

Housingsupply

Household tenure

Emerging trends

Page 33: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

Scoping

Factor research

Interviews

Workshops

Quantification

Scenario planning approach

Page 34: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

Interviewing decision makers

Page 35: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

” ” ��

'Automation increases the utility of the city for its citizens 

because it’s not so congested anymore. There’s more space for business to be done and it’s also a more pleasant space to be in'

'While public transport authorities have been somewhat stuck in their thinking, private operators have begun to fill in the gaps'

Interviewing decision makers

Page 36: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

Scoping

Factor research

Interviews

Workshops

Quantification

Scenario Planning approach

Page 37: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Workshops

Page 38: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Scoping

Factor research

Interviews

Workshops

Quantification

Scenario Planning approach

Page 39: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

New modelling approaches

Page 40: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

Outcome: 3 stories about the future of travel in London

Page 41: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Innovating London:

The story of London re‐inventing itself as a young, urban innovator, where technology changes how people live and work, but leaves some behind

Rebalancing London:

The story of a more equal but ageing society with lower economic growth, that focuses on self‐sufficiency and liveability as world power moves East 

Accelerating London:

The story of an ever‐growing, expanding London which acts as the beating heart of the world financial system, but struggles to deliver high quality of life for all

3 Stories about the future

Page 42: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

Each scenario has distinct implications for travel in London

Page 43: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Travel Implications

Innovating London

Page 44: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Less crowding and congestion

Rebalancing London

��

Travel Implications

Shorter trips in local area

walking and cycling more attractive

Page 45: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

Travel Implications

High density living increases potential for 

public transport

High pressure on radial links into central London

Accelerating London

Page 46: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

Our plans must be robust to a range of different futures 

Page 47: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Major infrastructure projects

Corporate strategy

Mayor’s Transport Strategy policies

��

Using the scenarios

Page 48: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

��

Using the scenarios

a. Reconsider This scheme only meets our objective in our assumed future. Look at other options that meet our objectives in an uncertain future.

c. ProceedThis strategy meets our objective in the majority of scenarios. Proceed but keep scenarios in mind in strategy development.

b. AdjustThis policy doesn’t meet our objective in some of our scenarios. Change the policy to make it work in more scenarios.

• Major Scheme• Transport policy• Corporate strategy

-

-+

++

++

-

-

-

++

+

++

-

Plans Scenario test

Outcome Action

Innovating London

Assumedfuture

Rebalancing London

Accelerating London

Objective

Page 49: Scenario Planning at TfL: Quantifying Uncertainty

Contact

Simon [email protected]