3
SCENARIO 1 {ANALYSIS USING TRAFFIC FLOW IN EQUIVALENT PCU’S} SCENARIO 2 {ANALYSIS USING CLASSIFIED TRAFFIC FLOW (LV +HGV)} 2007 2009 2011 2007 2009 2011 2013 OTHER FILES VISUM SYNCHRO HCS SIDRA SYNCHRO HCS SIDRA OTHER FILES HCS VISUM HCS VISUM HCS CD FOLDER STRUCTURE OTHER FILES OTHER FILES OTHER FILES VISUM OTHER FILES 2013 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +Full Development Traffic as per ADM Approved TIS 2013 2011 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +100% mall occupancy Traffic 2011 2009 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +40% mall occupancy Traffic 2009 Traffic Survey Counted Flows 2007 Details Year Analysis Year Traffic Flow Details OTHER FILES VISUM

SCENARIO 1 {ANALYSIS USING TRAFFIC FLOW IN EQUIVALENT PCU’S}

  • Upload
    liona

  • View
    34

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

CD FOLDER STRUCTURE. SCENARIO 1 {ANALYSIS USING TRAFFIC FLOW IN EQUIVALENT PCU’S}. SCENARIO 2 {ANALYSIS USING CLASSIFIED TRAFFIC FLOW (LV +HGV)}. 2009. 2007. 2013. 2011. 2009. 2011. 2007. VISUM. HCS. VISUM. HCS. OTHER FILES. OTHER FILES. OTHER FILES. OTHER FILES. SIDRA. VISUM. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: SCENARIO 1 {ANALYSIS USING TRAFFIC FLOW IN EQUIVALENT PCU’S}

SCENARIO 1{ANALYSIS USING TRAFFIC FLOW IN EQUIVALENT PCU’S}

SCENARIO 2{ANALYSIS USING CLASSIFIED TRAFFIC FLOW (LV +HGV)}

2007 2009 2011 2007 2009 2011 2013

OTHER FILES

VISUM

SYNCHRO HCS

SIDRA

SYNCHRO HCS

SIDRA

OTHER FILES

HCS

VISUM HCS

VISUM HCS

CD FOLDER STRUCTURE

OTHER FILES

OTHER FILES

OTHER FILES

VISUM

OTHER FILES

2013 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +Full Development Traffic as per ADM Approved TIS

2013

2011 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +100% mall occupancy Traffic2011

2009 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +40% mall occupancy Traffic2009

Traffic Survey Counted Flows2007

DetailsYear

Analysis Year Traffic Flow Details

OTHER FILES

VISUM

Page 2: SCENARIO 1 {ANALYSIS USING TRAFFIC FLOW IN EQUIVALENT PCU’S}

SCENARIO 1{ANALYSIS USING TRAFFIC FLOW IN EQUIVALENT PCU’S}

SCENARIO 2{ANALYSIS USING CLASSIFIED TRAFFIC FLOW (LV +HGV)}

2007 2009 2011 2007 2009 2011 2013

OTHER FILES

VISUM

SYNCHRO HCS

SIDRA

SYNCHRO HCS

SIDRA

OTHER FILES

HCS

VISUM HCS

VISUM HCS

CD FOLDER STRUCTURE

OTHER FILES

OTHER FILES

OTHER FILES

VISUM

OTHER FILES

2013 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +Full Development Traffic as per ADM Approved TIS

2013

2011 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +100% mall occupancy Traffic2011

2009 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +40% mall occupancy Traffic2009

Traffic Survey Counted Flows2007

DetailsYear

Analysis Year Traffic Flow Details

OTHER FILES

VISUM

Page 3: SCENARIO 1 {ANALYSIS USING TRAFFIC FLOW IN EQUIVALENT PCU’S}

SCENARIO 1{ANALYSIS USING TRAFFIC FLOW IN EQUIVALENT PCU’S}

SCENARIO 2{ANALYSIS USING CLASSIFIED TRAFFIC FLOW (LV +HGV)}

2007 2009 2011 2007 2009 2011 2013

OTHER FILES

VISUM

SYNCHRO HCS

SIDRA

SYNCHRO HCS

SIDRA

OTHER FILES

HCS

VISUM HCS

VISUM HCS

CD FOLDER STRUCTURE

OTHER FILES

OTHER FILES

OTHER FILES

VISUM

OTHER FILES

2013 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +Full Development Traffic as per ADM Approved TIS

2013

2011 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +100% mall occupancy Traffic2011

2009 Traffic Projected from 2007 applying 5% growth Rate +40% mall occupancy Traffic2009

Traffic Survey Counted Flows2007

DetailsYear

Analysis Year Traffic Flow Details

OTHER FILES

VISUM