Upload
abby-smith
View
12
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Methods • Retrospective patient information (n=25) was collected which included the following: age at diagnosis, gender, tumor site, tumor stage, height and weight, and enteral nutrition information (if applicable). Of the 25 records reviewed, 5 did not contain tumor stage and 7 did not include height.
• Weight change over the 5-‐week period was calculated by subtracting starting weight from ending weight, measured in kilograms.
• Percent weight change was calculated by dividing weight change in kilograms by starting weight in kilograms and multiplying by 100.
• The statistical package for Excel 2011 for Mac StatPlus: Mac LE (Build 6.0.3) was used for all statistical analyses. • A sample means t-‐test was used to examine the statistical signiRicance of the observed weight change. • Multiple linear regression was used to examine the strength of relationship between predictors – age, gender, tumor site – and the response variable – percent weight change.
• A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically signiRicant for all statistical analyses.
Impact of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head/Neck on Weight Status Abigail R. Smith
UK DHN CP Class 2016 Research Mentor: Aaron Schwartz, MS RD LD
Abstract The purpose was to examine the impact of diagnosis and treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head/neck (SCCHN) on weight status over a 5-‐week period. A sample of 25 SCCHN patients treated with radiation therapy for a minimum of 5 weeks was retrospectively analyzed. Comparison of the mean weight change over the 5-‐week period did not yield statistically signiRicant results (p=0.72). The average weight loss over 5 weeks was 3.12% (2.38 kg). Multiple linear regression examining the association between explanatory variables – age, gender, tumor site – and the response variable – percent weight change – explained 13.44% of weight change in this population (R2 =0.13442). Each additional year of age was associated with a 0.087% weight loss (p=0.13). Men were associated with 2.19% less weight loss over 5 weeks than women (p=0.38). Oral tumor site was associated with a 3.05% greater weight loss over 5 weeks when compared to other tumor H/N tumor sites (p=0.058). Though results did not reach statistical signiRicance, this study suggests substantial clinical implications. Data regarding the anticipated average weight loss and risk factors for increased weight loss in HNC patients could be used to guide healthcare professionals and caregivers in choosing an optimal prophylactic nutrition strategy.
Hypothesis Individuals diagnosed with and treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the head/neck (SCCHN) will experience signiRicant weight loss within the Rirst 5 weeks of treatment with radiation therapy. Objectives To measure the average weight change of individuals treated for SCCHN within the Rirst 5 weeks of treatment with radiation therapy and to identify risk factors for increased weight loss within this population.
Results • An examination of weight change over the 5-‐week treatment period did not yield statistically signiRicant results.
• The average weight change in the 5-‐week period was a loss of 2.38 kg.
• The average percent weight loss was 3.12%. • The sample means t-‐test for comparing the mean starting and ending weight (kg) resulted in a p value of 0.72.
• Multiple linear regression examining the association between explanatory variables – age, gender, tumor site – and the response variable – percent weight change – explained 13.44% of weight change in this population (R2 =0.13442).
Discussion/Conclusions • The observed results were in agreement with current research. Patients undergoing treatment for SCCHN experience weight loss1,2. Female gender and oral tumor site were risk factors associated with increased weight loss in SCCHN patients3.
• Future studies with a larger sample size and an expanded research design that allows access to more complete patient information as well as a timeline that allows researchers to follow patients during and after treatment may yield statistically signiRicant results.
• Although the observed weight change was not statistically signiRicant, it is clinically signiRicant. There was a 3.12% observed weight loss in 5 weeks compared to the deRinition of cachexia which is 5% weight loss in 3-‐12 months4.
• Data regarding the anticipated average weight loss and risk factors for increased weight loss in HNC patients could be used to guide healthcare professionals and caregivers in choosing an optimal prophylactic nutrition strategy based on the presence or absence of these risk factors.
References 1. Platek, M. E., Myrick, E., Mccloskey, S. A., Gupta, V., Reid, M. E., Wilding, G. E., . . . Singh, A. K. (2013). Pretreatment weight status and weight loss among
head and neck cancer patients receiving deRinitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy: Implications for nutrition integrated treatment pathways. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21(10), 2825-‐2833. doi:10.1007/s00520-‐013-‐1861-‐0
2. Silver, H. J., Guimaraes, C. D., Pedruzzi, P., Badia, M., Carvalho, A. S., Oliveira, B. V., . . . Pietrobon, R. (2010). Predictors of functional decline in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients from South Brazil. Head Neck Head & Neck, 32(9), 1217-‐1225. doi:10.1002/hed.21322
3. Zhao, J., Zheng, H., Li, L., Zhang, L., Zhao, Y., & Jiang, N. (2015). Predictors for Weight Loss in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy. Cancer Nursing, 38(6). doi:10.1097/ncc.0000000000000231
4. Von Haehling, S., & Anker, S. D. (2010). Cachexia as a major underestimated and unmet medical need: facts and numbers. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 1(1), 1– 5. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13539-‐010-‐0002-‐6
2
2
82.54
80.16
78.5 79
79.5 80
80.5 81
81.5 82
82.5 83
Starting Weight Ending Weight
Weight (kg)
Figure 2: Comparison of average starting and ending weights
Design A retrospective observational study was used to collect data for review. Patients diagnosed with an oral or throat squamous cell carcinoma tumor and treated with radiation therapy for a minimum of 5 weeks at the time of data collection were eligible for this review. Setting Data collection took place in the Radiation Medicine Department at a community cancer center in Central Kentucky.
Figure 1: High power view of squamous cell carcinoma malignancy