Upload
margaret-ball
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SCAMPI Review
WP6: Project Management3rd Annual Review of Project CNET-ICT-258414
Beaulieu, Brussels, Belgium26 November, 2013
Overview
• WP6 objectives and achievements in year 3• An overview of resources’ consumption• Final observations
Q/A at any time
WP6: Project management• WP6 mission:
– Provide internal project management and ensure that the overall co-ordination of objectives is met within the conditions of time, budget, control, effectiveness and quality of output.
– Represent the contact point of the project to the EC, the FP7 community and the external world.
• Participants: Aalto (coordinator), Martel• Person Months: 19 PMs planned, 19.4 PMs
consumed in total in WP6
Objectives for year 3• Ensure follow up on year 2 review• Supervise administrative procedures • Control the quality of the project outcomes• Monitor and report on efforts consumption• Facilitate partners’ interactions• Contribute to organization of project meetings• Ensure close coordination with the EC• Coordinate preparation for final review
Achievements for year 3• Supervised the follow up on Y2 review‘s
reccomendations• All project milestones and deliverables
reached and released as planned• Smooth and effective partners‘ coordination • Fine-grained control of resources through
– Periodic quarterly reports – Deliverable 6.4 – 3rd Periodic Report
• Good communication with the Project Officer
About the 3rd PPR (D6.4)• Year 3 ended 30 September 2013• D6.4 v1.0 delivered couple of weeks ago:
– We could collect all partners PMs‘ expenditures figures – Consolidated financial figures for all partners available but:
• Problems with the NEF in finalizing C Forms for Futurice • ETHZ waiting for final confirmation on financial figures from auditor
– The C Form figures might slightly change mainly due to the additional costs related to the final review
– Because of that we agreed with the PO not to submit the NEF session
• An updated version of D6.4 shall be released and NEF session submitted within the next two weeks
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
350.00
400.00
Oct-D
ec 10
Jan-Mar 11
April-June 11
July-Sep 11
Oct-D
ec 11
Jan-Mar 12
April-June 12
July-Sep 12
Oct-D
ec 12
Jan-Mar 13
April-June 13
July-Sep 13
PMs planned
PMs actual spent
PMs overview
361.8 PMs
317.3 PMs
About Costs• Actual figures for overall project duration:
– For a total of 361.8 PMs spent by the SCAMPI consortium:• Total Costs = € 3’857’635• Requested EC contribution = € 2’884’793
• Planned figures for overall project duration:– For a total of 317.3 PMs planned during the whole project
duration:• Total Costs = € 3’640’290• Requested EC Contribution = € 2’759’549
Over-expenditures for some partners: CHF/EUR
Deliverables year 3
Del No.
Deliverable name WP no. Nature Dissemination
Date/Partner
D2.2 Intermediate design and analysis of the SCAMPI service-oriented approach
2 R PU M30 / CNR
D1.3 SCAMPI architecture documentation
1 R PU M33 / ETHZ
D2.3 Final design and performance assessment of the SCAMPI service-oriented approach
2 R PU M34 / CNR
D3.3 Final design and performance assessment of the SCAMPI enabling mechanisms
3 R PU M34 / SUPSI
Deliverables year 3
Del No.
Deliverable name WP no. Nature Dissemination
Date/Partner
D4.3 SCAMPI and the FIRE facility
4 R PU M37 / ETHZ
D5.2 SCAMPI workshop 5 R PU M36 / Technicolor
D5.3 Exploitation plan 5 R PU M36 / Technicolor
D6.4 3rd Project Periodic Report 6 R PU M38 / Aalto
D6.5 Final Project Report 6 R PU M38 / Aalto
Milestones year 3
Mil No. Milestone name WP no. Date
MS9 Final SCAMPI solution 1 M35
MS10 Final validation of SCAMPI solution 1 M36
MS11 Successful completion of the year 3 project review
6 M36
Conclusions• SCAMPI has been a succesful project and
important results have been already obtained• In this last project year:
– We consolidated and completed our work as planned according also to the reviewers‘ feedback
– We moved SCAMPI implementations towards product grade
– Continued dissemination of results and promoted the visibility of the SCAMPI project
– Broadly promoted the uptake of SCAMPI concepts and technologies
Thank you for your attention and precious feedback and comments!
PMs Year 3 actual vs `planned´
CONTRACT N°: 258414
ACRONYM: SCAMPI
Partner - Person-month
PERIOD: October 2010-September 2013
To
tals
AA
LTO
Mar
tel
Tec
hnic
olo
r
SU
PS
I
ET
HZ
CN
R
Eur
ecom
Fut
uric
e
49.7 22.5 0.0 0.5 7.8 1.0 6.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 WP1: SCAMPI Architecture
46.4 18.0 0.0 2.0 10.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 10.3 10.3
92.5 9.9 0.0 17.3 14.2 5.0 27.0 19.1 0.0 0.0 WP2: Models and Design of SCAMPI Shared Service Provision
84.0 12.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 3.0 27.0 18.0 0.0 0.0
85.3 15.5 0.0 16.5 15.0 27.8 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 WP3: Support Mechanisms for Enabling and Securing Shared Services
68.9 6.0 0.0 12.0 14.0 26.9 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
73.6 11.8 0.0 7.2 14.8 22.8 10.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 WP4: Empirical Performance Evaluation of SCAMPI Services
67.0 15.9 0.0 4.0 12.0 18.0 10.0 7.0 0.0 0.0
41.3 10.4 0.0 6.0 10.1 6.3 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 WP5: Dissemination, Standardisation and Exploitation
32.0 6.0 0.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
19.4 8.9 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WP6: Project Management
19.0 6.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
361.8 79.1 10.5 47.5 61.8 62.9 62.0 26.1 12.0 12.0 Total Project Person-month 317.3 64.0 13.0 36.0 54.0 54.0 61.0 25.0 10.3 10.3
PMs per work package
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 Total
Actual PMs consumed so far per WP
Cumulative planned PMs so far per WP
PMs per partner
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
AALTO
MARTEL
Technicolor
SUPSI
ETHZ
CNREurecom
Futurice
Total
Actual PMs consumed so far per Partner
Cumulative planned PMs so far per Partner