SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    1/49

    LatestLaws.com

    1

    REPORTABLE

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

    CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

    WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 690 of 2015

    Suresh Chand Gautam …Pett!ner"s#

    Versus

    State !$ Uttar Pradesh % Ors& …Res'!ndent"s#

    (ITH

    WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 715 OF 2015

    WRIT PETITON (CIVIL) NO. 273 OF 2015

     

    J U D G M E N T

    D!"# M$%"& J. 

    In ths )at*h !$ (rt Pett!ns 're$erred under Art*+e ,-

    !$ the C!nsttut!n !$ Inda the 'ra.er re+ates t! ssue !$ a

    dre*t!n n the nature !$ mandamus *!mmandn/ the

    res'!ndents t! en$!r*e a''r!'rate+. the *!nsttut!na+

    mandate as *!ntaned under the 'r!0s!ns !$ Art*+es

    12"34A#5 12"346# and ,,7 !$ the C!nsttut!n !$ Inda !r5 n

    the a+ternat0e5 dre*tn/ the res'!ndents t! *!nsttute a

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    2/49

    LatestLaws.com

    2

    C!mmttee !r a''!nt a C!mmss!n *hared ether ). a

    retred Jud/e !$ the H/h C!urt !r Su'reme C!urt n ma8n/

    sur0e. and *!++e*tn/ ne*essar. 9ua+tat0e data !$ the

    S*hedu+ed Castes and the S*hedu+ed Tr)es n the ser0*es !$ 

    the State $!r /rantn/ reser0at!n n 'r!m!t!n n the +/ht !$ 

    dre*t!n /0es ). ths C!urt n M. Nagaraj & others v.

    Union of India & others 1& Let t )e *+ar$ed n the

    )e/nnn/5 a'art $r!m ths 'ra.er5 !ther re+e$s s!u/ht $!r n

    the 'ett!ns ha0e n!t )een ar/ued and r/ht+. s!5 as the sad

    /re0an*es ha0e a+read. )een dre*ted t! )e dea+t :th n

    nter+!*ut!r. a''+*at!ns t! )e $+ed n the *ase !$ U.P.

    Power Corporation Limited v. Rajesh Kumar & others -

    &

    -& At the *!mmen*ement !$ the hearn/5

    Dr& ;&S& Chauhan5 +earned *!unse+ a''earn/ $!r the

    'ett!ner n (rt Pett!n "C0+# N!&

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    3/49

    LatestLaws.com

    3

    others , and R.K. Sa!harwa" v. State of Pu!ja! # .  (e are

    n!t n*+ned t! enter nt! the sad ssue as :e are !$ the

    *!nsdered !'n!n that the 'r!n!un*ement n M. Nagaraj 

    "su'ra# s a )ndn/ 're*edent and has )een $!++!:ed n

    num)er !$ auth!rtes and that a'art5 t has re$erred t!5 n

    deta+5 a++ !ther )ndn/ 're0!us auth!rtes !$ +ar/er

    6en*hes and there d!es n!t a''ear an. :e/ht. ar/ument t!

    *!n0n*e us5 e0en $!r a m!ment5 that the sad de*s!n

    re9ures an. re*!nsderat!n& The su)mss!n !n the sad

    s*!re s re'e++ed&

    ,& The 'rn*'a+ su)mss!n !$ Mr& Sa+man ;hurshd5

    Mr& ;&V& Vsh:anathan5 +earned sen!r *!unse+ and Dr&

    ;&S& Chauhan +earned *!unse+ a''earn/ $!r the res'e*t0e

    'ett!ners s the a+ternat0e su)mss!n :h*h *an )e 'ut n

    three *!m'artments>4 "# the de*s!n rendered n M.

    Nagaraj   "su'ra# has n!t )een a''!ste+. a''+ed "# the

    auth!rt. n Rajesh Kumar   "su'ra# has t! a''+. 

    'r!s'e*t0e+. and *ann!t ha0e retr!s'e*t0e e$$e*t5 and "#

    e0en $ t s assumed5 as nter'reted n M. Nagaraj   "su'ra#5

    Art*+es 12"34A# and 12"346# are ena)+n/ *!nsttut!na+

    3 (1992) Supp. 3 SCC 2174 1995 (2) SCC 745

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    4/49

    LatestLaws.com

    4

    'r!0s!ns5 the *!n*e't !$ '!:er *!u'+ed :th dut. re9ures

    the auth!rtes t! 'er$!rm the dut. and the. are !)+/ed t!

    *!++e*t the 9uant$a)+e data t! ena)+e them t! ta8e a

    de*s!n !n reser0at!n n 'r!m!t!n and hen*e5 a

    mandamus sh!u+d )e ssued t! a++ auth!rtes t! *arr. !ut

    the *!nsttut!na+ *!mmand& (e ha0e 'ermtted Dr& Ra?0

    Dha0an t! ar/ue the matter as he had a''eared $!r s!me !$ 

    the res'!ndents n the *ase !$ Rajesh Kumar  "su'ra#&

    3& Art*+es 12"3#5 12"34A# and 12"346# read as under>4

    @'%*+ 16. E,-"* of o!!o%-/ / "+%$of !-* +!*o+/. 

    "3# N!thn/ n ths art*+e sha++ 're0ent the State$r!m ma8n/ an. 'r!0s!n $!r the reser0at!n !$ a''!ntments !r '!sts n $a0!ur !$ an. )a*8:ard*+ass !$ *tens :h*h5 n the !'n!n !$ the State5s n!t ade9uate+. re'resented n the ser0*esunder the State&

    "34A# N!thn/ n ths art*+e sha++ 're0ent the State$r!m ma8n/ an. 'r!0s!n $!r reser0at!n n

    matters !$ 'r!m!t!n5 :th *!nse9uenta+sen!rt.5 t! an. *+ass !r *+asses !$ '!sts n theser0*es under the State n $a0!ur !$ theS*hedu+ed Castes and the S*hedu+ed Tr)es:h*h5 n the !'n!n !$ the State5 are n!tade9uate+. re'resented n the ser0*es under theState&

    "346# N!thn/ n ths art*+e sha++ 're0ent the State

    $r!m *!nsdern/ an. un$++ed 0a*an*es !$ a .ear:h*h are reser0ed $!r )en/ $++ed u' n that .ear

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    5/49

    LatestLaws.com

    5

    n a**!rdan*e :th an. 'r!0s!n $!r reser0at!nmade under *+ause "3# !r *+ause "34A# as ase'arate *+ass !$ 0a*an*es t! )e $++ed u' n an. su**eedn/ .ear !r .ears and su*h *+ass !$ 

    0a*an*es sha++ n!t )e *!nsdered t!/ether :ththe 0a*an*es !$ the .ear n :h*h the. are )en/$++ed u' $!r determnn/ the *e+n/ !$ $$t. 'er*ent reser0at!n !n t!ta+ num)er !$ 0a*an*es !$ that .earB&

    7& In M. Nagaraj  "su'ra#5 the C!urt has en*!m'assed the

    $a*ts n the $!++!:n/ manner>4 

    @The 'ett!ners ha0e n0!8ed Art*+e ,- !$ theC!nsttut!n $!r a :rt n the nature !$ *ert!rart! 9uash the C!nsttut!n "E/ht.4$$thAmendment# A*t5 -==1 nsertn/ Art*+e 12"34A# !$ the C!nsttut!n retr!s'e*t0e+. $r!m 1

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    6/49

    LatestLaws.com

    6

    $urther '+eaded that the amendment a+s! see8s t!a+ter the $undamenta+ r/ht !$ e9ua+t. :h*h s'art !$ the )as* stru*ture !$ the C!nsttut!n& The'ett!ners sa. that the e9ua+t. n the *!ntet !$ 

    Art*+e 12"1# *!nn!tes @a**e+erated 'r!m!t!n s!as n!t t! n*+ude *!nse9uenta+ sen!rt.& The'ett!ners sa. that ). atta*hn/ *!nse9uenta+sen!rt. t! the a**e+erated 'r!m!t!n5 them'u/ned amendment 0!+ates e9ua+t. n Art*+e13 read :th Art*+e 12"1#& The 'ett!ners $urthersa. that ). 'r!0dn/ reser0at!n n the matter !$ 'r!m!t!n :th *!nse9uenta+ sen!rt.5 there sm'arment !$ e$$*en*.& The 'ett!ners sa. that

    n Indra Sa#hne$ "su'ra# de*ded !n 1241141-5ths C!urt has he+d that under Art*+e 12"3#5reser0at!n t! the 6a*8:ard C+asses s'ermss)+e !n+. at the tme !$ nta+ re*rutmentand n!t n 'r!m!t!n& The 'ett!ners sa. that*!ntrar. t! the sad ?ud/ment de+0ered !n1241141-5 Par+ament ena*ted the C!nsttut!n"Se0ent.4se0enth Amendment# A*t5 17& 6. thesad amendment5 Art*+e 12"34A# :as nserted5

    :h*h rentr!du*ed reser0at!n n 'r!m!t!n& TheC!nsttut!n "Se0ent.4se0enth Amendment# A*t517 s a+s! *ha++en/ed ). s!me !$ the 'ett!ners& The 'ett!ners sa. that $ a**e+erated sen!rt. s/0en t! the r!ster4'!nt 'r!m!tees5 the*!nse9uen*es :!u+d )e dsastr!us& …

    2& A$ter re$errn/ t! a seres !$ auth!rtes5 the C!urt

    *!n*+uded as $!++!:s>4 

    @1-1& The m'u/ned *!nsttut!na+ amendments). :h*h Art*+es 12"34A# and 12"346# ha0e )eennserted $+!: $r!m Art*+e 12"3#& The. d! n!t a+terthe stru*ture !$ Art*+e 12"3#& The. retan the*!ntr!++n/ $a*t!rs !r the *!m'e++n/ reas!ns5name+.5 )a*8:ardness and nade9ua*. !$ re'resentat!n :h*h ena)+es the States t! 'r!0de

    $!r reser0at!n 8ee'n/ n mnd the !0era++e$$*en*. !$ the State admnstrat!n under Art*+e

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    7/49

    LatestLaws.com

    7

    ,,7& These m'u/ned amendments are *!n$ned!n+. t! SCs and STs& The. d! n!t !)+terate an. !$ the *!nsttut!na+ re9urements5 name+.5 *e+n/+mt !$ 7= "9uanttat0e +mtat!n#5 the *!n*e't

    !$ *ream. +a.er "9ua+tat0e e*+us!n#5 thesu)4*+ass$*at!n )et:een O6Cs !n !ne hand andSCs and STs !n the !ther hand as he+d n Indra Sa#hne$ "su'ra#5 the *!n*e't !$ '!st4)ased r!ster:th n)u+t *!n*e't !$ re'+a*ement as he+d n.*. Sabhar#al "su'ra#&

    1--& (e reterate that the *e+n/ +mt !$ 7=5 the*!n*e't !$ *ream. +a.er and the *!m'e++n/

    reas!ns5 name+.5 )a*8:ardness5 nade9ua*. !$ re'resentat!n and !0era++ admnstrat0ee$$*en*. are a++ *!nsttut!na+ re9urements:th!ut :h*h the stru*ture !$ e9ua+t. !$ !''!rtunt. n Art*+e 12 :!u+d *!++a'se&

    1-,& H!:e0er5 n ths *ase5 as stated a)!0e5 theman ssue *!n*erns the @etent !$ reser0at!n& Inths re/ard the State *!n*erned :++ ha0e t! sh!:

    n ea*h *ase the esten*e !$ the *!m'e++n/reas!ns5 name+.5 )a*8:ardness5 nade9ua*. !$ re'resentat!n and !0era++ admnstrat0ee$$*en*. )e$!re ma8n/ 'r!0s!n $!r reser0at!n&As stated a)!0e5 the m'u/ned 'r!0s!n s anena)+n/ 'r!0s!n& The State s n!t )!und t!ma8e reser0at!n $!r SCsSTs n matters !$ 'r!m!t!ns& H!:e0er5 $ the. :sh t! eer*se therds*ret!n and ma8e su*h 'r!0s!n5 the State has

    t! *!++e*t 9uant$a)+e data sh!:n/ )a*8:ardness!$ the *+ass and nade9ua*. !$ re'resentat!n !$ that *+ass n 'u)+* em'+!.ment n addt!n t!*!m'+an*e :th Art*+e ,,7& It s made *+ear thate0en $ the State has *!m'e++n/ reas!ns5 as stateda)!0e5 the State :++ ha0e t! see that tsreser0at!n 'r!0s!n d!es n!t +ead t!e*ess0eness s! as t! )rea*h the *e+n/ +mt !$ 7= !r !)+terate the *ream. +a.er !r etend the

    reser0at!n nde$nte+.&

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    8/49

    LatestLaws.com

    8

    1-3& Su)?e*t t! the a)!0e5 :e u'h!+d the*!nsttut!na+ 0a+dt. !$ the C!nsttut!n"Se0ent.4se0enth Amendment# A*t5 17 the

    C!nsttut!n "E/ht.4$rst Amendment# A*t5 -===the C!nsttut!n "E/ht.4se*!nd Amendment# A*t5-=== and the C!nsttut!n "E/ht.4$$thAmendment# A*t5 -==1&

    1-7& (e ha0e n!t eamned the 0a+dt. !$ nd0dua+ ena*tments !$ a''r!'rate States andthat 9uest!n :++ )e /!ne nt! n nd0dua+ :rt'ett!n ). the a''r!'rate 6en*h n a**!rdan*e

    :th +a: +ad d!:n ). us n the 'resent *ase&

    @"i # Vestn/ !$ the '!:er ). an ena)+n/ 'r!0s!nma. )e *!nsttut!na++. 0a+d and .et @eer*se !$ '!:er ). the State n a /0en *ase ma. )ear)trar.5 'art*u+ar+.5 $ the State $a+s t! dent$. and measure the )a*8:ardness and nade9ua*. 8ee'n/ n mnd the e$$*en*. !$ ser0*e asre9ured under Art*+e ,,7&

    "ii # Art*+e 12"3# :h*h 'r!te*ts the nterests !$ *ertan se*t!ns !$ the s!*et. has t! )e )a+an*eda/anst Art*+e 12"1# :h*h 'r!te*ts the nterests!$ e0er. *ten !$ the entre s!*et.& The. sh!u+d

    )e harm!nsed )e*ause the. are restatements !$ the 'rn*'+e !$ e9ua+t. under Art*+e 13&

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    9/49

    LatestLaws.com

    9

    "iii # Ea*h '!st /ets mar8ed $!r the 'art*u+ar*ate/!r. !$ *anddates t! )e a''!nted a/anst tand an. su)se9uent 0a*an*. has t! )e $++ed ). 

    that *ate/!r. *anddate&

    "i # The a''r!'rate G!0ernment has t! a''+. the*adre stren/th as a unt n the !'erat!n !$ ther!ster n !rder t! as*ertan :hether a /0en*+ass/r!u' s ade9uate+. re'resented n theser0*e& The *adre stren/th as a unt a+s! ensuresthat the u''er *e+n/ +mt !$ 7= s n!t 0!+ated&Further5 r!ster has t! )e '!st4s'e*$* and n!t

    0a*an*. )ased&

    " # The State has t! $!rm ts !'n!n !n the9uant$a)+e data re/ardn/ ade9ua*. !$ re'resentat!n& C+ause "34A# !$ Art*+e 12 s anena)+n/ 'r!0s!n& It /0es $reed!m t! the State t!'r!0de $!r reser0at!n n matters !$ 'r!m!t!n&C+ause "34A# !$ Art*+e 12 a''+es !n+. t! SCs andSTs& The sad *+ause s *ar0ed !ut !$ Art*+e12"34A#& There$!re5 *+ause "34A# :++ )e /!0erned ). the t:! *!m'e++n/ reas!nsK@)a*8:ardness and@nade9ua*. !$ re'resentat!n5 as ment!ned nArt*+e 12"3#& I$ the sad t:! reas!ns d! n!t est5then the ena)+n/ 'r!0s!n *ann!t )e en$!r*ed&

    "i # I$ the *e+n/ +mt !n the *arr. !0er !$ un$++ed0a*an*es s rem!0ed5 the !ther a+ternat0e tme

    $a*t!r *!mes n and n that e0ent5 the tmes*a+ehas t! )e m'!sed n the nterest !$ e$$*en*. nadmnstrat!n as mandated ). Art*+e ,,7& I$ thetmes*a+e s n!t 8e't5 then '!sts :++ *!ntnue t!reman 0a*ant $!r .ears :h*h :!u+d )edetrmenta+ t! the admnstrat!n& There$!re5 nea*h *ase5 the a''r!'rate G!0ernment :++ n!:ha0e t! ntr!du*e the durat!n de'endn/ u'!nthe $a*t stuat!n&

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    10/49

    LatestLaws.com

    10

    "ii # I$ the a''r!'rate G!0ernment ena*ts a +a:'r!0dn/ $!r reser0at!n :th!ut 8ee'n/ n mndthe 'arameters n Art*+e 12"3# and Art*+e ,,75then ths C!urt :++ *ertan+. set asde and str8e

    d!:n su*h +e/s+at!n&

    "iii # The *!nsttut!na+ +mtat!n under Art*+e,,7 s re+aed and n!t !)+terated& As stateda)!0e5 )e t reser0at!n !r e0a+uat!n5e*ess0eness n ether :!u+d resu+t n 0!+at!n !$ the *!nsttut!na+ mandate& Ths eer*se5h!:e0er5 :++ de'end !n the $a*ts !$ ea*h *ase&

    "i # The *!n*e'ts !$ e$$*en*.5 )a*8:ardness andnade9ua*. !$ re'resentat!n are re9ured t! )edent$ed and measured& That eer*se de'ends!n the a0a+a)+t. !$ data& That eer*se de'ends!n numer!us $a*t!rs& It s $!r ths reas!n that theena)+n/ 'r!0s!ns are re9ured t! )e made)e*ause ea*h *!m'etn/ *+am see8s t! a*he0e*ertan /!a+s& H!: )est !ne sh!u+d !'tmse these*!n$+*tn/ *+ams *an !n+. )e d!ne ). the

    admnstrat!n n the *!ntet !$ +!*a+ 're0a+n/*!ndt!ns n 'u)+* em'+!.ment&

    " # Art*+e 12"3#5 there$!re5 *reates a $e+d :h*hena)+es a State t! 'r!0de $!r reser0at!n 'r!0dedthere ests )a*8:ardness !$ a *+ass andnade9ua*. !$ re'resentat!n n em'+!.ment& These are *!m'e++n/ reas!ns& The. d! n!t est nArt*+e 12"1#& It s !n+. :hen these reas!ns aresats$ed that a State /ets the '!:er t! 'r!0de $!rreser0at!n n the matter !$ em'+!.ment&

    &  Rajesh Kumar s *ase a+s! re$erred t! the auth!rt. n

    Suraj $han Meena & another v. State of Rajasthan &

    others 1= :heren t has )een ru+ed thus>4 

    10 (2011) 1 SCC 467

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    11/49

    LatestLaws.com

    11

    @66 & The '!st!n a$ter the de*s!n n &. /agaraj 0a%e "su'ra# s that reser0at!n !$ '!sts n'r!m!t!n s de'endent !n the nade9ua*. !$ re'resentat!n !$ mem)ers !$ the S*hedu+ed

    Castes and S*hedu+ed Tr)es and 6a*8:ardC+asses and su)?e*t t! the *!ndt!n !$ as*ertann/ as t! :hether su*h reser0at!n :asat a++ re9ured&

    6! & The 0e: !$ the H/h C!urt s )ased !n thede*s!n n &. /agaraj 0a%e% "su'ra# as n! eer*se:as underta8en n terms !$ Art*+e 12"34A# t!a*9ure 9uant$a)+e data re/ardn/ the

    nade9ua*. !$ re'resentat!n !$ the S*hedu+edCaste and S*hedu+ed Tr)e *!mmuntes n 'u)+*ser0*es& The Ra?asthan H/h C!urt has r/ht+. 9uashed the N!t$*at!ns dated -41-4-==- and-7434-== ssued ). the State !$ Ra?asthan'r!0dn/ $!r *!nse9uenta+ sen!rt. and'r!m!t!n t! the mem)ers !$ the S*hedu+ed Casteand S*hedu+ed Tr)e *!mmuntes and the samed!es n!t *a++ $!r an. nter$eren*e&

    & A$ter re$errn/ t! the sad de*s!n5 the C!urt n Rajesh 

    Kumar s *ase t!!8 n!te !$ the S!*a+ Just*e C!mmttee

    Re'!rt and the *hart and !'ned that the sad eer*se :as

    d!ne re/ard )en/ had t! the '!'u+at!n and 0a*an*es and

    n!t 8ee'n/ n 0e: the *!n*e'ts that ha0e )een e0!+0ed n

    M. Nagaraj   "su'ra#& It s !ne thn/ t! thn8 that there are

    statut!r. ru+es !r ee*ut0e nstru*t!ns t! /rant 'r!m!t!n

    )ut t *ann!t )e $!r/!tten that the. :ere a++ su)?e*t t! the

    'r!n!un*ement ). ths C!urt n %irpa" Singh Chauhan 

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    12/49

    LatestLaws.com

    12

    "su'ra# and jit Singh '()   "su'ra#& 6en/ !$ ths 0e:5 the

    C!urt he+d that a $resh eer*se n the +/ht !$ the ?ud/ment

    !$ the C!nsttut!n 6en*h n M. Nagaraj   "su'ra# s a

    *ate/!r*a+ m'erat0e& The stand that the *!nsttut!na+

    amendments ha0e $a*+tated the reser0at!n n 'r!m!t!n

    :th *!nse9uenta+ sen!rt. and ha0e /0en the stam' !$ 

    a''r!0a+ t! the A*t and the Ru+es *ann!t :thstand *+!se

    s*rutn. nasmu*h as the C!nsttut!n 6en*h has *+ear+. 

    !'ned that Art*+es 12"34A# and 12"346# are ena)+n/

    'r!0s!ns and the State *an ma8e 'r!0s!ns $!r the same

    !n *ertan )ass !r $!undat!n& The *!ndt!ns 're*edent

    ha0e n!t )een sats$ed& N! eer*se has )een underta8en&

    On the sad s*!re5 the C!urt dd n!t a**e't the su)mss!n

    as the 'r!0s!ns !$ the C!nsttut!n are treated 0a+d :th

    *ertan *!ndt!ns and rders& Therea$ter the C!urt

    *!n*+uded>4

    @In the u+tmate ana+.ss5 :e *!n*+ude and h!+dthat Se*t!n ,"

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    13/49

    LatestLaws.com

    13

    1=& T! ha0e a *!m'+ete '*ture5 :e ma. re'r!du*e Se*t!n

    ,"4 

    @+o/ 3. Reservation in favour of S*hedu"ed Castes+ S*hedu"ed ,ri!es and -ther $a*ward C"asses &K 

    "1#4"2#

    "4 

    @4'. /ntit"ement of *onse0uentia" seniorit to a person !e"onging to S*hedu"ed Castes or S*hedu"ed ,ri!es &KN!t:thstandn/ an.thn/*!ntaned n Ru+es 25 < !r !$ these Ru+es5 a'ers!n )e+!n/n/ t! the S*hedu+ed Castes !rS*hedu+ed Tr)es sha++5 !n hs 'r!m!t!n ). 0rtue!$ ru+e !$ reser0at!nr!ster5 )e entt+ed t!*!nse9uenta+ sen!rt. a+s!& 

    1-& Ru+e 4A :as !mtted !n 1,&=7&-==7 ). the Uttar

    Pradesh G!0ernment Ser0ants Sen!rt. "Se*!nd

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    14/49

    LatestLaws.com

    14

    Amendment# Ru+es5 -==7& H!:e0er5 t :as 'r!0ded n the

    sad Ru+es that the 'r!m!t!ns made n a**!rdan*e :th the

    re0sed sen!rt. as determned under Ru+e 4A 'r!r t! the

    *!mmen*ement !$ the -==7 Ru+es *!u+d n!t )e a$$e*ted&

     Therea$ter5 !n 13&&-==

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    15/49

    LatestLaws.com

    15

    the 13 A*t and Ru+e 4A are ultra   ire%. (hat has )een

    stated n the sad ?ud/ment s that an. 'r!m!t!n that has

    )een /0en !n the d*tum !$ Indra   Sawhne   "su'ra# and

    :th!ut the ad !r assstan*e !$ Se*t!n ,"

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    16/49

    LatestLaws.com

    16

    ma. )e 'reser0ed and the $uture 'r!te*ted& Inthat *ase t :as +ad d!:n that the d!*trne !$ 'r!s'e*t0e !0erru+n/ *an )e n0!8ed !n+. nmatters arsn/ under the C!nsttut!n and the

    same *an )e a''+ed !n+. ). ths C!urt n tsds*ret!n t! )e m!u+ded n a**!rdan*e :th the ?ust*e !$ the *ause !r matter )e$!re t&

    A$ter s! statn/5 the C!urt 'r!*eeded t! h!+d as $!++!:s>4

    @-=& A**e'tn/ the +ead /0en n the a)!0ede*s!n5 ths C!urt has sn*e etended the

    d!*trne t! the nter'retat!n !$ !rdnar. statutes as :e++& In the *ases !$ 1a2an ao  0&Union of India 34 5 Ata2 Pra+a%h   0& State of ar$ana 3 5 7ri%%a Ce2ent 8td.  0& State of 7ri%%a 39 5 Union of India  0& &ohd. a2:an *han 35 

    and &anaging ;ire0tor 4

    @&& It s made *+ear that ths ?ud/ment :++ n!ta$$e*t an. a''!ntment made 'r!r t! ths date

    under the Ru+es :h*h ha0e )een $!und t! )en0a+d herena)!0e&

    1

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    17/49

    LatestLaws.com

    17

    @&& It s $!r ths C!urt t! nd*ate as t! :hetherthe de*s!n n 9uest!n :++ !'erate'r!s'e*t0e+.& In !ther :!rds5 there sha++ )e n!'r!s'e*t0e !0erru+n/5 un+ess t s s! nd*ated

    n the 'art*u+ar de*s!n& It s n!t !'en t! )ehe+d that the de*s!n n a 'art*u+ar *ase :++ )e'r!s'e*t0e n ts a''+*at!n ). a''+*at!n !$ the d!*trne !$ 'r!s'e*t0e !0erru+n/& Thed!*trne !$ )ndn/ 're*edent he+'s n 'r!m!tn/*ertant. and *!nssten*. n ?ud*a+ de*s!nsand ena)+es an !r/an* de0e+!'ment !$ the +a:)esdes 'r!0dn/ assuran*e t! the nd0dua+ ast! the *!nse9uen*es !$ transa*t!ns $!rmn/ 'art

    !$ the da+. a$$ars& That )en/ the '!st!n5 theH/h C!urt :as n err!r ). h!+dn/ that the ?ud/ment :h*h !'erated !n the date !$ se+e*t!n:as !'erat0e and n!t the re0e: ?ud/ment nA%ho+ *u2ar Shar2a 0a%e /o. II 3" & A++ the m!res! :hen the su)se9uent ?ud/ment s ). :a. !$ re0e: !$ the $rst ?ud/ment n :h*h *ase thereare n! ?ud/ments at a++ and the su)se9uent ?ud/ment rendered !n re0e: 'ett!ns s the !ne

    and !n+. ?ud/ment rendered5 e$$e*t0e+. and $!ra++ 'ur'!ses5 the ear+er de*s!n ha0n/ )eenerased ). *!untenan*n/ the re0e: a''+*at!ns& The m'u/ned ?ud/ments !$ the H/h C!urt are5there$!re5 set asde&

    1& Tested !n the a$!resad 'rn*'+es5 t s +umnes*ent

    that the 'r!n!un*ement n Rajesh Kumar  "su'ra# s ). n!

    means 'r!s'e*t0e& The de*+arat!n s *+ear and the

    dre*t!ns are a)s!+ute+. +m'd& The C!urt has n!t stated

    that the entre 'ast 'r!m!t!ns sh!u+d )e sa0ed& It a++!:s

    +mted s'here !$ sa0n/& Thus 0e:ed5 the su)mss!n that

    'r!s'e*t0t. s nhered n the sad ?ud/ment d!es n!t a''ea+18 (1997) 4 SCC 18

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    18/49

    LatestLaws.com

    18

    t! us& I$ a 'r!m!tee s sa0ed as 'er the ?ud/ment !$ the sad

    *ase5 the same s sa0ed and $!r that reas!n5 the C!urt has

    a+read. dre*ted n *ertan nter+!*ut!r. a''+*at!ns that the

    'r!m!tees :h! ha0e )een re0ersed5 ther /re0an*e sha++ )e

    +!!8ed nt! ). a *!mmttee and the de*s!n !$ the

    *!mmttee *an dre*t+. )e *ha++en/ed ). :a. !$ nter+!*ut!r. 

    a''+*at!n )e$!re ths C!urt n ths *ase& (e ma. 

    n/emnate :th!ut an. reser0at!n that ). n! means

    'r!s'e*t0t. n entret. *an )e /0en t! the sad de*s!n&

    1& The *entr'!da+ stand !$ the 'ett!ners s that

    assumn/ the 'rn*'+e stated n M. Nagaraj   "su'ra# s

    *!rre*t and :hat has )een stated n Rajesh Kumar =%   *ase

    $!++!:n/ the d*tum n M. Nagaraj   "su'ra# h!+ds s!und

    then a+s! the ena)+n/ *!nsttut!na+ 'r!0s!ns *ann!t

    reman a)s!+ute+. stat*& The *!nsttut!na+ amendments

    ha0e )een )r!u/ht n5 and !n*e the. ha0e )een he+d 0a+d5 t

    s the !)+/at!n !$ the State and the *!m'etent auth!rt. t!

    /0e e$$e*t t! the same as 'er the n!rms en0sa/ed n the

     ?ud/ments !$ ths C!urt& In *ase the sad eer*se s n!t

    *arred !ut5 t s the *!nsttut!na+ dut. !$ ths C!urt t! see

    that the *!nsttut!na+ n!rm5 'h+!s!'h. and the 'ur'!se

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    19/49

    LatestLaws.com

    19

    are :!r8ed !ut5 es'e*a++. 8ee'n/ n 0e: Art*+es 12"3#5

    12"34A#5 12"346#5 32 and ,,7 !$ the C!nsttut!n !$ Inda and

    a+s! the 'rn*'+e !$ a$$rmat0e a*t!n :h*h s meant $!r

    *ertan hst!r*a++. dsad0anta/ed /r!u's& It s $urther

    ar/ued that n M. Nagaraj   "su'ra# Art*+es 12"34A# and

    12"346# ha0e )een re/arded as ena)+n/ 'r!0s!ns :h*h

    *!n$er '!:ers !n the State auth!rtes t! 'r!0de reser0at!n

    n 'r!m!t!n :th *!nse9uenta+ sen!rt. su)?e*t t! the

    *!ndt!n !$ a0a+a)+t. !$ a''r!'rate data t! ?ust$. eer*se

    !$ the ena)+n/ 'r!0s!n& The sad auth!rtes d! n!t de)ar

    the State t! *arr. !ut the sad eer*se and :hen t s n!t

    d!ne5 t s t! )e 'resumed that the State as a m!de+

    em'+!.er has $a+ed n ts dut. and hen*e5 t s !)+/at!r. !n

    the 'art !$ ths C!urt t! re9ure t t! *arr. !ut the 'r!*edure

    s! that the *!nsttut!na+ 0s!n s rea+ed& It has )een

    h/h+/hted )e$!re us that the *!n*e't !$ @'!:er *!u'+ed

    :th dut. *!mes nt! '+a. n the nstant *ase and5 there$!re5

    the *!urt sh!u+d ssue a''r!'rate dre*t!n t! the State t!

    *!++e*t the ne*essar. 9ua+tat0e data& Re+an*e has )een

    '+a*ed !n e+e0en4Jud/e 6en*h de*s!n n Madhav Rao 

    2ivaji Rao S*india v. Union of India 1

    & (e ha0e )een19  (1971) 1 SCC 85

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    20/49

    LatestLaws.com

    20

    *!mmended t! 'ara/ra'h 11< $r!m the ma?!rt. ?ud/ment

    ). Just*e J&C& Shah5 :h*h s t! the $!++!:n/ e$$e*t>4

    @114

    @In m. !'n!n Art*+e ,22"--# m'!ses a dut. !nthe Presdent and $!r that 'ur'!se has *!n$erred!n hm *ertan '!:ers& In !ther :!rds the '!:er*!n$erred !n the Presdent under that 'r!0s!n s!ne *!u'+ed :th dut.& There are sm+ar '!:ers*!n$erred !n the Presdent under the C!nsttut!n&

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    21/49

    LatestLaws.com

    21

    Under Cha'ter VI !$ the C!nsttut!n *ertans'e*a+ 'r!0s!ns :ere made $!r the )ene$t !$ theS*hedu+ed Castes and *ertan S*hedu+ed Tr)es&Seats :ere reser0ed $!r them )!th n the

    Par+ament as :e++ as n the State Assem)+es&Certan !ther )ene$ts :ere a+s! se*ured t! themn the matter !$ a''!ntments t! ser0*es and'!sts n *!nne*t!n :th the a$$ars !$ the Un!n!r !$ a State& 6ut the C!nsttut!n dd n!t s'e*$. :h*h *astes :ere S*hedu+ed Castes and :h*h Tr)es :ere S*hedu+ed Tr)es& Under Art*+es,31"1# and ,3-"1# !$ the C!nsttut!n5 thePresdent :as /0en '!:er t! s'e*$. the *astes

    :h*h he *!nsdered t! )e S*hedu+ed Castes andthe Tr)es :h*h he *!nsdered t! )e S*hedu+ed Tr)es& Th!u/h )!th the Art*+es sa. the Presdent@ma. s'e*$. the *astes :h*h he *!nsders asS*hedu+ed and Tr)es :h*h he *!nsdersS*hedu+ed5 t s *+ear that a *!nsttut!na+ dut. :as m'!sed !n hm t! s'e*$. :h*h *astes :ereS*hedu+ed Castes and :h*h tr)es :ereS*hedu+ed Tr)es $!r the 'ur'!se !$ the

    C!nsttut!n& The :!rd @ma. n th!se *+ausesmust )e read as @must )e*ause $ he had $a+ed !rde*+ned t! s'e*$. the *astes and tr)es5 Art*+es,,=5 ,,-5 ,,35 ,,75 ,, and ,3= :!u+d ha0e)e*!me n!'erat0e and the *!nsttut!na+/uarantees /0en t! the S*hedu+ed Castes andS*hedu+ed Tr)es :!u+d ha0e )e*!memeann/+ess&

    -1& Ins'rat!n has a+s! )een dra:n $r!m m!i*a 3uerr 

    4ors v. State of 1ujarat -=.  In the sad *ase5 the C!urt

    :as en/a/ed n nter'retat!n !$ *ertan ru+es !$ Gu?arat

    Mn!r Mnera+ Ru+es5 122& On )eha+$ !$ the a''e++ant

    theren5 re+an*e :as '+a*ed !n State of Rajasthan v.

    20  (1987) 1 SCC 213

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    22/49

    LatestLaws.com

    22

    5arishaner Rajendrapa" -1  t! ad0an*e a *!ntent!n that

    the :!rd ma. s t! )e read as sha++ and there). *!n0e. the

    meann/ that t s mandat!r.& In that *!ntet5 the C!urt

    !)ser0ed>4

    @O$ten :hen a 'u)+* auth!rt. s 0ested :th'!:er5 the e'ress!n @ma. has )een *!nstruedas @sha++ )e*ause '!:er $ the *!ndt!ns $!r theeer*se are $u+$++ed s *!u'+ed :th dut.& As!)ser0ed n Craie% on Statute 8a# 5

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    23/49

    LatestLaws.com

    23

    de*s!n that ena)+n/ :!rds :ere a+:a.s*!m'u+s!r. :here the :!rds :ere t! e$$e*tuate a+e/a+ r/ht&

    6e t n!ted5 n the sad de*s!n5 the C!urt has

    a''r!0ed and a''+ed the 'rn*'+e stated n 2u"ius  "su'ra#&

    --& (e ha0e a+s! )een re$erred t! $rij Mohan La" v. Union 

    of India & others -,& In the sad *ase5 a'art $r!m !ther

    ssues5 the re+e$ re+ated t! ssue !$ dre*t!n t! the

    res'!ndents theren t! st!' the s*heme and '!+*. !$ 

    a''!ntment !$ retred Dstr*t and Sess!ns Jud/es as

    ad ho0  Jud/es !$ the Fast Tra*8 C!urts "FTCs# n the State

     Jud*a+ Ser0*es& (e need n!t re$er t! the *!ntent!ns

    rased and h!: the ssue :as e0entua++. ans:ered& In the

    sad *ase5 the t:!4Jud/e 6en*h de+)erated !n the 9uest!n

    :hether a :rt !$ mandamus *an at a++ )e ssued re/ard

    )en/ had t! the $a*tua+ s*!re !$ the *ase& The C!urt t!!8

    n!te !$ the $a*t that !r/n !$ FTC S*heme :as n a '!+*. 

    de*s!n ). the Centra+ G!0ernment and the sad de*s!n

    :as ta8en t! m'+ement the FTC S*heme5 'art*u+ar+.5 t!

    dea+ :th the arrears !$ *rmna+ *ases n the *!untr. and t

    had ta8en u'!n tse+$ the )urden !$ $nan*n/ the entre

    23 (2012) 6 SCC 502

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    24/49

    LatestLaws.com

    24

    s*heme& The C!urt re$erred t! the *!n*e't !$ ?ud*a+ re0e:

    n '!+*. matters and the s*!'e !$ nter$eren*e n that

    re/ard5 ad0erted t! the 'rn*'+es stated n S.P. 1upta s *ase

    and !ther de*s!ns and !'ned thus>4 

    @1=2& Ths C!urt has *!nsstent+. he+d that the:rt !$ mandamus *an )e ssued5 'erha's n!t asre/ards the manner !$ ds*har/e !$ 'u)+* dut. )ut :th res'e*t t! the due eer*se !$ ds*ret!nn the *!urse !$ su*h dut.& In S.P. 'upta  0& Union 

    of India  "su'ra# ths C!urt ssued dre*t!ns t! theUn!n !$ Inda t! determne5 :thn a reas!na)+etme5 the stren/th !$ 'ermanent Jud/es re9ured$!r ds'!sa+ !$ *ases nsttuted n the H/h C!urtsand t! ta8e tests t! $++ u' the 0a*an*es a$terma8n/ su*h determnat!n&

     

    111& It s5 thus5 *+ear that t s the *!nsttut!na+dut. !$ ths C!urt t! ensure mantenan*e !$ thende'enden*e !$ ?ud*ar. as :e++ as thee$$e*t0eness !$ the ?ust*e de+0er. s.stem n the*!untr.& The data and statst*s '+a*ed !n re*!rd5!$ :h*h ths C!urt *an e0en !ther:se ta8e ?ud*a+ n!t*e5 sh!: that *ertan and e$$e*t0emeasures are re9ured t! )e ta8en ). the StateG!0ernments t! )rn/ d!:n the 'enden*. !$ *ases

    n the +!:er *!urts& It ne*essar+. m'+es that theG!0ernment sh!u+d n!t $rame an. '!+*es !r d!an. a*ts :h*h sha++ der!/ate $r!m the 0er. eth!s!$ the stated )as* 'rn*'+e !$ ?ud*a+nde'enden*e& I$ the '!+*. de*s!n !$ the State s+8e+. t! 'r!0e *!unter'r!du*t0e and n*rease the'enden*. !$ *ases5 there). +mtn/ the r/ht t!$ar and e'edt!us tra+ t! the +t/ants n ths*!untr.5 t :++ tantam!unt t! n$rn/ement !$ 

    ther )as* r/hts and *!nsttut!na+ 'r!te*t!ns&

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    25/49

    LatestLaws.com

    25

     Thus5 :e ha0e n! hestat!n n h!+dn/ that nthese *ases5 the C!urt *!u+d ssue a mandamus& The etent !$ su*h '!:er5 :e sha++ ds*uss sh!rt+. herena$ter&

     The a$!resad de*s!n5 n !ur *!nsdered !'n!n5 s

    9ute dstn/usha)+e& The C!urt :as re$errn/ t! *ertan

    *!nsttut!na+ *!n*e'ts5 name+.5 *!nsttut!na+ dut.5

    nde'enden*e !$ ?ud*ar.5 e$$e*t0eness !$ ?ust*e de+0er. 

    s.stem n the *!untr.5 the n$rn/ement !$ s'e*$* r/hts and

    *!nsttut!na+ 'r!te*t!n& (e :++ n *!urse !$ !ur

    de+)erat!ns ad0ert t! :hether the sad 'rn*'+es *an )e

    ta8en re*!urse t! n the *ase at hand& 

    -,& Re+an*e has a+s! )een '+a*ed ). the +earned *!unse+

    !n the de*s!n n neesh 6. Lawande & others v. State 

    of 1oa & others -35 :here the C!urt has re$erred t! the

    auth!rt. n 2u"ius "su'ra# and !)ser0ed e0er. 'u)+*

    auth!rt. :h! has a dut. *!u'+ed :th '!:er )e$!re

    eer*sn/ the '!:er s re9ured t! understand the !)?e*t !$ 

    su*h '!:er and the *!ndt!ns n :h*h the same s t! )e

    eer*sed& Learned *!unse+ $!r the 'ett!ners em'hasn/

    !n the *!n*e't!n !$ @'!:er *!u'+ed :th dut. has re$erred

    t! seres !$ ?ud/ments& (e ha0e a+read. re$erred t! s!me

    24  (2014) 1 SCC 554

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    26/49

    LatestLaws.com

    26

    and :e thn8 t a''r!'rate t! re$er t! s!me& In 6hampur 

    Sugar Mi""s Ltd. v.State of U.P. and others -75 the

    attent!n !$ the t:!4Jud/e 6en*h :as en/a/ed n re+at!n t!

    *!nsttut!n !$ the Ad0s!r. C!mmttee under Uttar Pradesh

    Sheera N.antran Adhn.am5 123& 6e$!re the H/h C!urt

    re+an*e :as '+a*ed !n Khoda disti""eries Ltd. v. State of 

    Karnataa -2  $!r inter alia  that Se*t!n , !$ 123 A*t *!u+d

    mere+. )e an ena)+n/ 'r!0s!n and thus5 dre*t!r. n

    nature and hen*e5 the :rt 'ett!ner *!u+d n!t *!m'e+ the

    State t! *!nsttute an Ad0s!r. C!mmttee& The H/h C!urt

    re$erred t! the de*s!n n Khoda disti""eries Ltd. "su'ra#

    and !'ned that the 'r!0s!n :as dre*t!r. n nature& Ths

    C!urt re$erred t! the re+e0ant 'r!0s!ns !$ the A*t5 the Ru+es

    $ramed under the A*t and the n!t$*at!n ssued thereunder

    and *ame t! h!+d that the su)mss!n !$ the :rt 'ett!ner

    that su*h a C!mmttee !u/ht t! ha0e )een *!nsttuted ). 

    the State :as :e++ $!unded& It dd n!t a**e't the 0e:

    e'ressed ). the H/h C!urt that the 'r!0s!n :as

    dre*t!r.& It !)ser0ed that se0era+ statutes *!n$er '!:er !n

    auth!rtes and !$$*ers t! )e eer*sed ). them at ther

    25 (2007) 8SCC 33826 (1995) 1 SCC 574

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    27/49

    LatestLaws.com

    27

    ds*ret!n and the. are *!u*hed n 'ermss0e +an/ua/e5

    su*h as5 @t ma. )e +a:$u+5 @t ma. )e 'ermss)+e5 @t ma. 

    )e !'en t! d!5 et*& 6ut n *ertan stuat!ns5 su*h '!:er s

    *!u'+ed :th dut. and must )e eer*sed& The C!urt

    re$erred t! $aer+ Re Ni*ho"s v. $aer -

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    28/49

    LatestLaws.com

    28

    -3& (e :++ )e $a+n/ n !ur dut. $ :e d! n!t ta8e n!te !$ 

    an!ther $a*et !$ the su)mss!ns ad0an*ed ). the +earned

    *!unse+ $!r the 'ett!ners& It s ur/ed ). them that t s the

    *!nsttut!na+ dut. and !)+/at!n !$ the auth!rtes t! :!r8

    !ut the *!nsttut!na+ 'r!0s!ns t! e$$e*tuate the a$$rmat0e

    a*t!n meant $!r s*hedu+ed *astes and the s*hedu+ed tr)es

    'ers!ns and re/ard )en/ had t! the 'rn*'+es stated n M.

    Nagaraj   "su'ra#5 the reser0at!n n 'r!m!t!n :th

    *!nse9uenta+ sen!rt. *ann!t )e th!u/ht !$ :th!ut

    *!++e*t!n !$ the ne*essar. 9uanttat0e data n re/ard t!

    *ertan as'e*ts& Me*hansms are t! )e 'r!0ded $!r

    *!++e*t!n !$ su*h data& It s *!ntended that $a+ure t! d! s!

    tantam!unts t! $a+ure !$ 'er$!rman*e !$ *!nsttut!na+ dut.&

    E+a)!ratn/ $urther5 t s h/h+/hted that :hen there s

    a'ath. n ta8n/ the ste's t! +0e u' t! the *!nsttut!na+

    !)+/at!n5 the C!urt s e'e*ted n +a: t! ssue a mandamus

    t! *!mmand the auth!rtes t! *arr. !ut the *!nsttut!na+

    dut.5 $!r n!n4'er$!rman*e !$ su*h dut. :!u+d a$$e*t and

    e0entua++. ?e!'arde the $undamenta+ a$$rmat0e $a*ets !$ 

    the C!nsttut!n& It s a+s! ar/ued that ths C!urt has n

    man. an auth!rt. $ramed the /ude+nes5 ssued dre*t!ns

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    29/49

    LatestLaws.com

    29

    $!r 'er$!rman*e !$ dut. and a+s! $++ed the /a's :here0er

    re9ured and5 there$!re5 n the 'resent stuat!n5 the C!urt

    *an dre*t $!r *!++e*t!n !$ the re9uste data s! that u+tmate

    *!nsttut!na+ /!a+ s a*he0ed & In ths re/ard5 :e ha0e )een

    *!mmended t! 6.K. $asu v. State of 4est $enga" & 

    others 88 + Ranveer :adav v. State of $ihar 8# + Nagar 

    Pa"ia Nigam v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti 8; + nush 

    Shivaji 1aiwad v. State of Maharashtra 8on>Re*ord sso*iation & others v. Union of 

    India #( &

    -7& In S.P. 1upta  "su'ra# the +ar/er 6en*h has he+d thus>4

    33  (2015) 8 SCC 74434  (2010) 11 SCC 49335  AIR 2009 SC 18736  (2013) 6 SCC 77037  AIR 1950 SC 22238  AIR 1992 SC 32039  AIR 1980 SC 168240

      (2013) 9 SCC 13641  1981 Supp (1) SCC 8742  (1993) 4 SCC 441

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    30/49

    LatestLaws.com

    30

    @It s true that the :!rds n Art*+e -12 !$ theC!nsttut!n are und!u)ted+. em'!:ern/ )ut thas )een s! !$ten de*ded as t! ha0e )e*!me ana!m that n 'u)+* statutes :!rds !n+. dre*t!r.5

    'ermss!r. !r ena)+n/ ma. ha0e a *!m'u+s!r. $!r*e :here the thn/ t! )e d!ne s $!r the 'u)+*)ene$t !r n ad0an*ement !$ 'u)+* ?ust*e& Thus5the ena)+n/ '!:er *ann!t )e re$used t! )eeer*sed ). the re'!st!r. !$ that '!:er5 as su*hre$usa+ :!u+d )e *!ntrar. t! the *!nsttut!na+'rn*'+es and su*h a*t!n s n!t 'ermss)+eunder the s*heme !$ the C!nsttut!n&

    -2& Re+.n/ !n the sad de*s!n5 +earned *!unse+ :!u+d

    su)mt the sad 'rn*'+e has n!t )een u'set ). the

    nne4Jud/e 6en*h n Supreme Court dvo*ates>on>Re*ord 

    "su'ra#& (e ha0e )een a+s! a''rsed that the se0en4Jud/e

    6en*h has a''r!0ed the 'rn*'+e stated n 2u"ius   "su'ra#5

    :heren t has )een he+d thus>4

    @there ma. )e s!methn/ n the nature !$ thn/em'!:ered t! )e d!ne5 s!methn/ n the !)?e*t$!r :h*h t s t! )e d!ne5 s!methn/ n the*!ndt!ns under :h*h t s t! )e d!ne5s!methn/ n the tt+e !$ the 'ers!n !r 'ers!ns $!r:h!se )ene$t the '!:er s t! )e eer*sed5 :h*h

    ma. *!u'+e the '!:er :th a dut.5 and ma8e tthe dut. !$ the 'ers!n n :h!m the '!:er sre'!sed5 t! eer*se that '!:er :hen *a++ed u'!nt! d! s!&

    -

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    31/49

    LatestLaws.com

    31

    settn/ u' !$ State Human R/hts C!mmss!n& Inter'retn/

    the sad 'r!0s!n5 the C!urt has !)ser0ed>4

    @A '+an readn/ !$ the a)!0e :!u+d sh!: thatPar+ament has used the :!rd @ma. nsu)4se*t!n "1# !$ Se*t!n -1 :h+e 'r!0dn/ $!rthe settn/ u' !$ a State Human R/htsC!mmss!n& In *!ntrast Par+ament has used the:!rd @sha++ n Se*t!n ,"1# :h+e 'r!0dn/ $!r*!nsttut!n !$ a Nat!na+ C!mmss!n& Thear/ument !n )eha+$ !$ the de$au+tn/ States5there$!re5 :as that the use !$ t:! d$$erent

    e'ress!ns :h*h dea+n/ :th the su)?e*t !$ ana+!/!us nature s a *+ear nd*at!n that :h+e aNat!na+ Human R/hts C!mmss!n s mandat!r. a State C!mmss!n s n!t& That ar/ument s n!d!u)t attra*t0e5 )ut d!es n!t stand *+!ses*rutn.& The use !$ the :!rd @2a$  s n!t ). tse+$ determnat0e !$ the true nature !$ the '!:er !rthe !)+/at!n *!n$erred !r *reated under a'r!0s!n& The +e/a+ '!st!n !n the su)?e*t s

    $ar+. :e++ sett+ed ). a +!n/ +ne !$ de*s!ns !$ thsC!urt& The stated '!st!n s that the use !$ the:!rd @2a$  d!es n!t a+:a.s mean that theauth!rt. u'!n :h*h the '!:er s 0ested ma. !rma. n!t eer*se that '!:er& (hether !r n!t the:!rd @2a$  sh!u+d )e *!nstrued as mandat!r. and e9u0a+ent t! the :!rd @%hall  :!u+d de'endu'!n the !)?e*t and the 'ur'!se !$ the ena*tmentunder :h*h the sad '!:er s *!n$erred as a+s!

    re+ated 'r!0s!ns made n the ena*tment& The:!rd @2a$  has )een !$ten read as @%hall  !r@2u%t  :hen there s s!methn/ n the nature !$ the thn/ t! )e d!ne :h*h must *!m'e+ su*h areadn/& In !ther :!rds5 the *!n$erment !$ the'!:er u'!n the auth!rt. ma. ha0n/ re/ard t!the *!ntet n :h*h su*h '!:er has )een*!n$erred and the 'ur'!se !$ ts *!n$erment asa+s! the *r*umstan*es n :h*h t s meant t! )e

    eer*sed *arr. :th su*h '!:er an !)+/at!n:h*h *!m'e+s ts eer*se&

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    32/49

    LatestLaws.com

    32

    -& In the sad *ase re$eren*e :as made t! 2u"ius   "su'ra#

    and the !'n!n !$ Just*e Carns5 L&C& :as 9u!ted and

    therea$ter5 the !'n!n !$ L!rd 6+a*8)urn :h*h s t! the

    $!++!:n/ e$$e*t :as re'r!du*ed>4

    @I d! n!t thn8 the :!rds t sha++ )e +a:$u+ are nthemse+0es am)/u!us at a++& The. are a't :!rdst! e'ress that a '!:er s /0en and as5 'rma

    $a*e5 the d!nee !$ a '!:er ma. ether eer*se t!r +ea0e t unused5 t s n!t na**urate t! sa. that5'rma $a*e5 the. are e9u0a+ent t! sa.n/ that thed!nee ma. d! t )ut $ the !)?e*t $!r :h*h the'!:er s *!n$erred s $!r the 'ur'!se !$ en$!r*n/a r/ht5 there ma. )e a dut. *ast !n the d!nee !$ the '!:er5 t! eer*se t $!r the )ene$t !$ th!se:h! ha0e that r/ht5 :hen re9ured !n ther)eha+$&

    -& As s e0dent5 the C!urt has re$erred t! num)er !$ 

     ?ud/ments that the :!rd @ma. at tmes *an assume the

    *hara*ter !$ @sha++& In the sad *ase5 stress :as +ad !n

    a**ess !$ ?ust*e and n that *!ntet5 re+an*e :as '+a*ed !n

    ImtiaB hmad v. State of U.P.  o+%$3,

    & A$ter re$errn/

    *ertan re*!mmendat!ns5 the C!urt ssued num)er !$ 

    dre*t!ns&

    ,=& Learned *!unse+ $!r the 'ett!ner5 as stated ear+er5

    has $!unded hs ar/ument !n the 'rn*'+es stated n man. 

    43  (2012) 2 SCC 688

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    33/49

    LatestLaws.com

    33

    auth!rtes :h*h 'ertan t! nter'retat!n !$ @'!:er *!u'+ed

    :th dut.& Re$eren*e has )een made t! $reen v.

    ma"gamated /ngineering Union 33

     :h*h has )een *ted

    ). the H!use !$ L!rds n Padfie"d "su'ra# :heren ther

    L!rdsh's *!nsdern/ the ds*ret!n !$ statut!r. auth!rt. 

    under the A/r*u+ture Mar8etn/ A*t5 17 "U;# !'ned>4

    @The ds*ret!n !$ a statut!r. )!d. s ne0er

    un$ettered& It s a ds*ret!n :h*h s t! )eeer*sed a**!rdn/ t! +a:& That means at +eastths> the statut!r. )!d. must )e /uded ). re+e0ant *!nsderat!ns and n!t ). rre+e0ant& I$ ts de*s!n s n$+uen*ed ). etrane!us*!nsderat!ns5 :h*h s !u/ht n!t t! ha0e ta8ennt! a**!unt5 then the de*s!n *ann!t stand&

    ,1& The sad 0e: has )een a**e'ted ). the C!urt n S.P.

    1upta  "su'ra#&

    ,-& In ,.N. 1odavarman ,hirumu"pad v. Union of India 

    and others 37 the C!urt re$erred t! the de*s!n n Lafarge 

    Umiam Mining 'P) Ltd. v. Union of India & others 325

    re'r!du*ed a 'ara/ra'h $r!m t and !)ser0ed>4 

    @It :++ )e *+ear $r!m the ta+*sed '!rt!ns !$ the!rder !$ ths C!urt n 8afarge U2ia2 &ining (P) 8td. "su'ra# etra*ted a)!0e that ths C!urt !n annter'retat!n !$ Se*t!n ,",# !$ the En0r!nment"Pr!te*t!n# A*t5 12 has ta8en a 0e: that t*!n$ers a '!:er *!u'+ed :th dut. t! a''!nt an

    44

     (1971) 2 175, 19045 (2014) 4 SCC 6146 (2011) 7 SCC 338

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    34/49

    LatestLaws.com

    34

    a''r!'rate auth!rt. n the $!rm !$ a Re/u+at!r atthe State and at the Centra+ +e0e+ $!r a''rasn/'r!?e*ts5 en$!r*n/ en0r!nmenta+ *!ndt!ns $!ra''r!0a+s and t! m'!se 'ena+tes !n '!++uters

    and has5 a**!rdn/+.5 dre*ted the Centra+G!0ernment t! a''!nt a Nat!na+ Re/u+at!runder the sad 'r!0s!n !$ the A*t& Mr Parasarans5 there$!re5 n!t r/ht n ar/un/ that n 8afarge U2ia2 &ining (P) 8td.  "su'ra#5 ths C!urt hasmere+. su//ested that a Nat!na+ Re/u+at!r sh!u+d)e a''!nted and has n!t ssued an. mandamust! a''!nt a Nat!na+ Re/u+at!r&

    ,,& The ar/ument s5 assumn/ the 'rn*'+es stated n M.

    Nagraj  "su'ra# are *!rre*t5 t s the dut. !$ the State t! /0e

    e$$e*t t! the same and t *ann!t reman n a'ath. !r +e n

    s+um)er& In su*h a stuat!n5 the C!urt has the '!:er

    under the C!nsttut!n5 :hen m!0ed5 t! dre*t them t! :a8e

    u' and a*t&

    ,3& The *!re ssue s :hether n the *!ntet !$ Art*+es

    12"34A# and 12"346#5 a :rt !r dre*t!n *an )e ssued t! the

    State G!0ernment !r ts $un*t!nares !r the

    nstrumenta+tes !$ the State t! *!++e*t and /ather the

    ne*essar. data $!r the 'ur'!se !$ ta8n/ a de*s!n as

    re/ards the 'r!m!t!n and *!nse9uenta+ $at!n !$ 

    sen!rt.& In ths re/ard5 t s m'erat0e t! a''re*ate n

    'r!'er 'ers'e*t0e the *!n*e't !$ mandamus and the

    *r*umstan*es n :h*h t *an )e ssued&

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    35/49

    LatestLaws.com

    35

    ,7& In Ha+s)ur.s La:s !$ En/+and5 F!urth Edt!n5 V!+ume

    15 t has )een stated>4

    849. N"-%+ of "/"-$.  The !rder !$ mandamus3

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    36/49

    LatestLaws.com

    36

    ,4 

    @Mr A&;& Sen5 +earned *!unse+ $!r the a''e++ants

    dre: !ur attent!n t! :hat S&A& de Smth has'!nted !ut at '& 7 !$ the thrd Edn& !$ hs :e++8n!:n treatse @Judi0ial eie# of Ad2ini%tratie A0tion >

    @It ma. des*r)e an. dut.5 the ds*har/e !$ :h*h n0!+0es n! e+ement !$ ds*ret!n !rnde'endent ?ud/ment& Sn*e an !rder !$ mandamus :++ ssue t! *!m'e+ the'er$!rman*e !$ a mnstera+ a*t5 and sn*e5

    m!re!0er5 :r!n/$u+ re$usa+ t! *arr. !ut amnstera+ dut. ma. /0e rse t! +a)+t. nt!rt5 t s !$ten !$ 'ra*t*a+ m'!rtan*e t!determne :hether ds*ret!n s 'resent n the'er$!rman*e !$ a statut!r. $un*t!n& The *ases!n mandamus sh!:5 h!:e0er5 that the'resen*e !$ a mn!r ds*ret!nar. e+ement s

    51

     (1973) 1 SCC 48552 1962 Supp 2 SCR 14453 (1978) 1 SCC 1

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    37/49

    LatestLaws.com

    37

    n!t en!u/h t! deter the C!urts $r!m*hara*tersn/ a $un*t!n as mnstera+&

    (e thn8 that the Re/!na+ Trans'!rt Auth!rt.5

    'ursuant t! the !rder !$ the A''e++ate Tr)una+5had mere+. t! 'er$!rm a mnstera+ dut. and themn!r ds*ret!nar. e+ement /0en t! t $!r $ndn/!ut :hether the terms !$ the A''e++ate Order had)een *!m'+ed :th !r n!t s n!t en!u/h t! deterthe C!urts $r!m *hara*tersn/ the $un*t!n asmnstera+& On the $a*ts and n the *r*umstan*es!$ ths *ase ). a :rt !$ mandamus the sadauth!rt. must )e dre*ted t! 'er$!rm ts

    $un*t!n&

    ,& Dr& Dha0an5 :h! has )een 'ermtted t! ar/ue5 has

    '+a*ed re+an*e !n the sad de*s!n !n+. t! '!nt !ut that

    the mandamus s!u/ht n the 'resent *ase d!es n!t *!me n

    the nature !$ mandamus that the C!urt has dea+t :th5 n

    the a$!resad *ase& It s hs su)mss!n that the $a*ts n

    :h*h dre*t!ns ha0e )een ssued are 9ute d$$erent and

    that a'art5 the C!urt has ssued a :rt !$ mandamus n

    *ases :h*h n0!+0ed mn!r ds*ret!nar. e+ement )ut n!t

    :here a ma?!r '!+*. de*s!n s n0!+0ed& It s hs

    su)mss!n that :hen the auth!rt. has a ds*ret!n t!

    eer*se the ds*ret!n !r n!t re/ard )en/ had t! man. an

    admnstrat0e *!ntn/en*es5 the C!urt sh!u+d re$ran $r!m

    ssun/ a mandamus& It s )e*ause at ths sta/e there s

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    38/49

    LatestLaws.com

    38

    nether an. sem)+an*e !$ r/ht n!r eer*se !$ '!:er *!u'+ed

    :th dut.&

    3=& In ths re/ard re$eren*e t! the de*s!n n 6ire*tor of 

    Sett"ements+ .P. and others v. M.R. pparao and 

    another 73 :!u+d )e $rut$u+& In the sad *ase5 a three4Jud/e

    6en*h !$ the C!urt5 :h+e dea+n/ :th the !rder !$ the H/h

    C!urt t! ssue mandamus5 !'ned>4 

    @… One !$ the *!ndt!ns $!r eer*sn/ '!:erunder Art*+e --2 $!r ssuan*e !$ a mandamus sthat the C!urt must *!me t! the *!n*+us!n thatthe a//re0ed 'ers!n has a +e/a+ r/ht5 :h*hentt+es hm t! an. !$ the r/hts and that su*hr/ht has )een n$rn/ed& In !ther :!rds5 esten*e!$ a +e/a+ r/ht !$ a *ten and 'er$!rman*e !$ an. *!rres'!ndn/ +e/a+ dut. ). the State !r an. 

    'u)+* auth!rt.5 *!u+d )e en$!r*ed ). ssuan*e !$ a :rt !$ mandamus& @Mandamus means a*!mmand& It d$$ers $r!m the :rts !$ 'r!h)t!n!r *ert!rar n ts demand $!r s!me a*t0t. !n the'art !$ the )!d. !r 'ers!n t! :h!m t saddressed& Mandamus s a *!mmand ssued t!dre*t an. 'ers!n5 *!r'!rat!n5 n$er!r *!urts !rG!0ernment5 re9urn/ hm !r them t! d! s!me'art*u+ar thn/ theren s'e*$ed :h*h

    a''ertans t! hs !r ther !$$*e and s n thenature !$ a 'u)+* dut.& A mandamus s a0a+a)+ea/anst an. 'u)+* auth!rt. n*+udn/admnstrat0e and +!*a+ )!des5 and t :!u+d +e t!an. 'ers!n :h! s under a dut. m'!sed ). astatute !r ). the *!mm!n +a: t! d! a 'art*u+ara*t& In !rder t! !)tan a :rt !r !rder n the nature!$ mandamus5 the a''+*ant has t! sats$. that hehas a +e/a+ r/ht t! the 'er$!rman*e !$ a +e/a+ dut. 

    ). the 'art. a/anst :h!m the mandamus s54 (2002) 4 SCC 638

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    39/49

    LatestLaws.com

    39

    s!u/ht and su*h r/ht 2u%t be %ub%i%ting on the date of the petition  "*al$an Singh  0& State of U.P.55 #& The dut. that ma. )e en?!ned ). mandamus ma. )e !ne m'!sed ). the C!nsttut!n5 a statute5

    *!mm!n +a: !r ). ru+es !r !rders ha0n/ the $!r*e!$ +a:& …

     

    31& Ha0n/ stated a)!ut /enera+ 'rn*'+es re+atn/ t!

    mandamus5 the 9uest!n arses K :hether a *!urt sh!u+d

    ssue a dre*t!n t! e$$e*tuate an ena)+n/ *!nsttut!na+

    'r!0s!n :h*h has t! )e eer*sed ). the State n ts

    ds*ret!n !n )en/ sats$ed !$ *ertan *!ndt!ns 're*edent&

     There *an )e n! d!u)t that *ertan *!nsttut!na+ dutes are

    n$erred $r!m the 0ar!us Art*+es !$ the C!nsttut!n and

    ths C!urt has ssued dre*t!ns& Certan dre*t!ns ha0e

    )een ssued n S.P. 1upta   "su'ra# and Supreme Court 

    dvo*ates>on>Re*ord sso*iation "su'ra# "IInd Jud/es

    *ase# )ut the. are )ased !n 'rn*'+es !$ se*ure !'erat!n !$ 

    +e/a+ s.stem5 a**ess t! ?ust*e and s'eed. ds'!sa+ !$ *ases&

    In "" India 2udges sso*iation & others v. Union of 

    India & others 725 the C!urt ssued dre*t!ns ). statn/ that

    t s the *!nsttut!na+ !)+/at!n t! ensure that the )a*8+!/

    !$ *ases s de*reased and e$$!rts are made t! n*rease the

    ds'!sa+ !$ *ases& ;ee'n/ n 0e: the *!n*e't !$ 

    55 AIR 1962 SC 118356 (2002) 4 SCC 247

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    40/49

    LatestLaws.com

    40

    *!nsttut!na+ s+en*e !r a)e.an*e5 /ude+nes :ere ssued n

    %ishaa & others v. State of Rajasthan & others 7

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    41/49

    LatestLaws.com

    41

    Managing 6ire*tor+ Centra" $an of India & -rs. v.

    Centra" $an of India SCDS, /mp"oees 4e"fare 

    sso*iation & -rs &7

     t has )een he+d thus>4

    @In the $rst nstan*e5 :e ma8e t *+ear that theres n! ds'ute a)!ut the *!nsttut!na+ '!st!nen0sa/ed n Art*+es 17 and 125 ns!$ar as these'r!0s!ns em'!:er the State t! ta8e a$$rmat0ea*t!n n $a0!ur !$ SCST *ate/!r. 'ers!ns ). ma8n/ reser0at!ns $!r them n the em'+!.mentn the Un!n !r the State "!r $!r that matter5

    'u)+* se*t!rauth!rtes :h*h are treated asState under Art*+e 1- !$ the C!nsttut!n#& The+auda)+e !)?e*t0e under+.n/ these 'r!0s!ns sa+s! t! )e 8e't n mnd :h+e underta8n/ an. eer*se 'ertann/ t! the ssues t!u*hn/ u'!nthe reser0at!n !$ su*h SCST em'+!.ees&Further5 su*h a reser0at!n *an n!t !n+. )e madeat the entr. +e0e+ )ut s 'ermss)+e n the matters!$ 'r!m!t!ns as :e++s& At the same tme5 t s a+s!

    t! )e )!rne n mnd that C+auses 3 and 3A !$ Art*+e 12 !$ the C!nsttut!n are !n+. theena)+n/ 'r!0s!ns :h*h 'ermt the State t!ma8e 'r!0s!n $!r reser0at!n !$ these *ate/!r. !$ 'ers!ns& Ins!$ar as ma8n/ !$ 'r!0s!ns $!rreser0at!n n matters !$ 'r!m!t!n t! an. *+ass !r*+asses !$ '!st s *!n*erned5 su*h a 'r!0s!n *an)e made n $a0!ur !$ SCST C0+ A''ea+ N!& !$ -=17 % Ors& "arsn/ !ut !$ SLP "C# N!& 3,7 !$ 

    -=1= % Ors *ate/!r. em'+!.ees $5 n the!'n!n !$ the State5 the. are n!t ade9uate+. re'resented n ser0*es under the State& Thus5 n!d!u)t5 '!:er +es :th the State t! ma8e a'r!0s!n5 )ut5 at the same tme5 *!urts *ann!tssue an. mandamus t! the State t! ne*essar+. ma8e su*h a 'r!0s!n& It s $!r the State t! a*t5 na /0en stuat!n5 and t! ta8e su*h an a$$rmat0ea*t!n& O$ *!urse5 :hene0er there ests su*h a

    'r!0s!n $!r reser0at!n n the matters !$ 59 2015 (1) SCA./ 169

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    42/49

    LatestLaws.com

    42

    re*rutment !r the 'r!m!t!n5 t :!u+d )est!: anen$!r*ea)+e r/ht n $a0!ur !$ 'ers!ns )e+!n/n/ t!SCST *ate/!r. and !n $a+ure !n the 'art !$ an. auth!rt. t! reser0e the '!sts5 :h+e ma8n/

    se+e*t!ns'r!m!t!ns5 the )ene$*ares !$ these'r!0s!ns *an a''r!a*h the C!urt t! /et therr/hts en$!r*ed& (hat s t! )e h/h+/hted s thatesten*e !$ 'r!0s!n $!r reser0at!n n the matter!$ se+e*t!n !r 'r!m!t!n5 as the *ase ma. )e5 sthe sne 9ua n!n $!r see8n/ mandamus as t s!n+. :hen su*h a 'r!0s!n s made ). the State5a r/ht sha++ a**rue n $a0!ur !$ SCST *anddatesand n!t !ther:se&

     The a$!resad 'assa/e ma8es ts +umnes*ent that

    esten*e !$ a 'r!0s!n $!r reser0at!n n the matter !$ 

    se+e*t!n !r 'r!m!t!n s the %ine >ua non   $!r see8n/

    mandamus& The r/ht a**rues n $a0!ur !$ the S*hedu+ed

    Castes and the S*hedu+ed Tr)es *anddates :hen there s a

    'r!0s!n& (e are a)s!+ute n *!ns*!us that the *!ntr!0ers. 

    )e$!re us s 9ute d$$erent& The re+e$ s n!t s!u/ht !n the

    )ass !$ esten*e !$ a 'r!0s!n& The /re0an*e 'ertans t!

    ste's )en/ n!t ta8en t! *!++e*t the 9uant$a)+e data as has

    )een en0sa/ed n M. Nagaraj   "su'ra#& T! a''re*ate the

    re+e$ n ts 9untessen*e5 t s m'erat0e t! *+ear+. 

    understand the rat! +ad d!:n n M. Nagaraj   "su'ra#& The

    C!nsttut!n 6en*h :h+e !'nn/ that Art*+es 12"34A# and

    "346# are ena)+n/ 'r!0s!ns had !)ser0ed thus>4

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    43/49

    LatestLaws.com

    43

    @…Etent !$ reser0at!n5 as stated a)!0e5 :++de'end !n the $a*ts !$ ea*h *ase& 6a*8:ardnessand nade9ua*. !$ re'resentat!n are *!m'e++n/reas!ns $!r the State G!0ernments t! 'r!0de

    re'resentat!n n 'u)+* em'+!.ment& There$!re5 $ n a /0en *ase the *!urt $nds e*ess0ereser0at!n under the State ena*tment then su*han ena*tment :!u+d )e +a)+e t! )e stru*8 d!:nsn*e t :!u+d am!unt t! der!/at!n !$ the a)!0e*!nsttut!na+ re9urements&

    A$ter s! statn/5 the +ar/er 6en*h has *+ear+. he+d that

    Art*+e 12"34A# and 12 "346# d! n!t a+ter the stru*ture !$ 

    Art*+e 12"3#& The sad Art*+es are *!n$ned t! the S*hedu+ed

    Castes and the S*hedu+ed Tr)es and d! n!t !)+terate an. !$ 

    the *!nsttut!na+ re9urements5 name+.5 *e+n/ +mt !$ 7=

    "9uanttat0e +mtat!n#5 the *!n*e't !$ *ream. +a.er

    "9ua+tat0e e*+us!n#5 the su)4*+ass$*at!n )et:een O6Cs

    !n !ne hand and SCs and STs !n the !ther hand as he+d n

    Indra Sawhne   "su'ra#5 the *!n*e't !$ '!st4)ased r!ster

    :th n)u+t *!n*e't !$ re'+a*ement as he+d n R.K.

    Sa!harwa"  "su'ra#& A$ter s! statn/5 the C!urt has ad0erted

    t! the *!n*e't !$ @etent !$ reser0at!n& In that re/ard5 t has

    )een !'ned that the State *!n*erned s re9ured t! sh!: n

    ea*h *ase the esten*e !$ the *!m'e++n/ reas!ns5 name+.5

    )a*8:ardness5 nade9ua*. !$ re'resentat!n and !0era++

    admnstrat0e e$$*en*. )e$!re ma8n/ 'r!0s!n $!r

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    44/49

    LatestLaws.com

    44

    reser0at!n& It has )een *+ear+. +ad d!:n that the State s

    n!t )!und t! ma8e reser0at!n $!r SCsSTs n matters !$ 

    'r!m!t!n& H!:e0er5 $ the State :shes t! eer*se the

    ds*ret!n and ma8e su*h 'r!0s!n5 t has t! *!++e*t

    9uant$a)+e data sh!:n/ )a*8:ardness !$ the *+ass and

    nade9ua*. !$ re'resentat!n !$ that *+ass n 'u)+*

    em'+!.ment n addt!n t! *!m'+an*e :th Art*+e ,,7& The

    e'ress!n !$ the !'n!n *+ear+. dem!nstrates that the

    re/ard )en/ had t! the ena)+n/ 'r!0s!ns !$ Art*+es

    12"34A# and "346#5 the State s n!t )!und t! ma8e

    reser0at!n& It has a ds*ret!n t! d! s! and the States

    ds*ret!n *an !n+. )e eer*sed !n *ertan *!ndt!ns )en/

    sats$ed& In Rajesh Kumar s *ase5 a$ter *u++n/ !ut the

    'rn*'+es stated n M. Nagaraj   "su'ra# the C!urt has

    /ra'h*a++. stated that a $resh eer*se n a**!rd :th the +a:

    +ad d!:n n M. Nagaraj  "su'ra# s a *ate/!r*a+ m'erat0e&

    It has )een he+d that the State *an ma8e 'r!0s!ns $!r

    reser0at!n n 'r!m!t!n :th *!nse9uenta+ sen!rt. !n

    *ertan )ass !r $!undat!n and *!ndt!ns 're*edents ha0e

    t! )e sats$ed& The C!urt has de*+ared Se*t!n ,"# !$ the

    13 A*t and Ru+e 4A !$ the -==- Ru+es as un*!nsttut!na+

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    45/49

    LatestLaws.com

    45

    as n! $resh eer*se had )een underta8en& The su)mss!n

    !$ the +earned *!unse+ $!r the 'ett!ners s that a *!mmand

    sh!u+d )e ssued t! the State !$ Uttar Pradesh t! *!++e*t the

    data as enshrned n the C!nsttut!n 6en*h de*s!n n M.

    Nagaraj  "su'ra# s! that )ene$t !$ reser0at!n n 'r!m!t!n

    *an )e /0en& The re+e$ s!u/ht ma. a''ear nn!*u!us !r

    sm'+e )ut :hen the C!urt thn8s !$ ssue !$ a :rt !$ 

    mandamus5 t has t! a''rse tse+$ !$ an estn/ r/ht !r a

    '!:er t! )e eer*sed re/ard )en/ had t! the *!n*e't!n !$ 

    dut.& The *!n*e't !$ '!:er *!u'+ed :th dut. s a+:a.s

    )ased !n $a*ts& I$ :e 8een+. s*rutne the re+e$ s!u/ht5 the

    'ra.er s t! ssue a mandamus t! the State and ts

    $un*t!nares t! *arr. !ut an eer*se $!r the 'ur'!se !$ 

    eer*sn/ a ds*ret!n& T! e+u*date5 the ds*ret!n s t!

    ta8e a de*s!n t! ha0e the reser0at!n5 and t! ha0e

    reser0at!n there s a ne*esst. $!r *!++e*t!n !$ data n

    a**!rdan*e :th the 'rn*'+es stated n M. Nagaraj  "su'ra#

    as the same s the *!ndt!n 're*edent& A :rt !$ mandamus

    s s!u/ht t! *!++e*t matera+ !r data :h*h s n the rea+m !$ 

    *!ndt!n 're*edent $!r eer*sn/ a ds*ret!n :h*h $+!:s

    $r!m the ena)+n/ *!nsttut!na+ 'r!0s!n& Dre*t!n !$ ths

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    46/49

    LatestLaws.com

    46

    nature5 n !ur *!nsdered !'n!n5 :!u+d n!t *!me :thn

    the 'rn*'+e !$ eer*se !$ '!:er *!u'+ed :th dut.& A

    dre*t!n $!r eer*se !$ a dut. :h*h has nherent and

    nse/reta)+e neus :th the *!nsttut!na+ 'r!0s!n +8e

    Art*+e -1 !$ the C!nsttut!n !r a statut!r. dut. :h*h s

    essenta+ $!r 'ra.er as +ad d!:n n 2u"ius   "su'ra# :here a

    '!:er s de'!sted :th a 'u)+* !$$*er )ut the 'ur'!se !$ 

    )en/ used $!r the )ene$t !$ 'ers!ns :h! are s'e*$*a++. 

    '!nted !ut :th re/ard t! :h!m a ds*ret!n s a''+ed ). 

    the Le/s+ature !n the *!ndt!ns u'!n :h*h the. are

    entt+ed& (e are n*+ned t! thn8 s! as the +an/ua/e

    em'+!.ed n M.N":"%"; "su'ra# *+ear+. states that the State s

    n!t )!und t! ma8e reser0at!n n 'r!m!t!n& Thus5 there s

    n! *!nsttut!na+ !)+/at!n& The de*s!ns :heren ths

    C!urt has '+a*ed re+an*e !n J-*-$  "su'ra# and the !ther

     ?ud/ments !$ ths C!urt and ssued dre*t!ns5 the +an/ua/e

    em'+!.ed n the statute s d$$erent and su)ser0es mmense

    'u)+* nterest n the sad auth!rtes5 the 'ur'!se and

    'ur'!rt are 9ute d$$erent&

    3,& 6e t *+ear+. stated5 the C!urts d! n!t $!rmu+ate an. 

    '!+*.5 remans a:a. $r!m ma8n/ an.thn/ that :!u+d

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    47/49

    LatestLaws.com

    47

    am!unt t! +e/s+at!n5 ru+es and re/u+at!n !r '!+*. re+atn/

    t! reser0at!n& The C!urts *an test the 0a+dt. !$ the same

    :hen the. are *ha++en/ed& The *!urt *ann!t dre*t $!r

    ma8n/ +e/s+at!n !r $!r that matter an. 8nd !$ 

    su)4!rdnate +e/s+at!n& (e ma. hasten t! add that n

    *ertan de*s!ns dre*t!ns ha0e )een ssued $!r $ramn/ !$ 

    /ude+nes !r the *!urt has tse+$ $ramed /ude+nes $!r

    sustann/ *ertan r/hts !$ :!men5 *h+dren !r 'rs!ners !r

    under4tra+ 'rs!ners& The sad *ate/!r. !$ *ases $a++s n a

    d$$erent *!m'artment& The. are n d$$erent s'here than

    :hat s en0sa/ed n Art*+e 12 "34A# and 12 "346# :h!se

    *!nsttut!na+ 0a+dt. ha0e )een u'he+d ). the C!nsttut!n

    6en*h :th *ertan 9ua+$ers& The. ha0e )een re/arded as

    ena)+n/ *!nsttut!na+ 'r!0s!ns& Addt!na++. t has )een

    '!stu+ated that the State s n!t )!und t! ma8e reser0at!n

    $!r S*hedu+ed Castes and S*hedu+ed Tr)es n matter !$ 

    'r!m!t!ns& There$!re5 there s n! dut.& In su*h a stuat!n5

    t! ssue a mandamus t! *!++e*t the data :!u+d tantam!unt

    t! as8n/ the auth!rtes :hether there s am'+e data t!

    $rame a ru+e !r re/u+at!n& Ths :++ )e n a :a.5 entern/

    nt! the d!man !$ +e/s+at!n5 $!r t s a ste' t!:ards

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    48/49

    LatestLaws.com

    48

    *!mmandn/ t! $rame a +e/s+at!n !r a de+e/ated +e/s+at!n

    $!r reser0at!n&

    33& Re*ent+. n Census Commissioner & others v.

    R. Krishnamurth 2=  a three4Jud/e 6en*h :h+e dea+n/

    :th the *!rre*tness !$ the ?ud/ment !$ the h/h *!urt

    :heren the H/h *!urt had dre*ted that the Census

    De'artment !$ G!0ernment !$ Inda sha++ ta8e su*h

    measures t!:ards *!ndu*tn/ the *aste4:se *ensus n the

    *!untr. at the ear+est and n a tme4)!und manner5 s! as t!

    a*he0e the /!a+ !$ s!*a+ ?ust*e n ts true sense5 :h*h s

    the need !$ the h!ur5 the *!urt ana+.n/ the *!ntet !'ned

    thus >4

    @Inter$eren*e :th the '!+*. de*s!n and ssue !$ a mandamus t! $rame a '!+*. n a 'art*u+armanner are a)s!+ute+. d$$erent& The A*t has*!n$erred '!:er !n the Centra+ G!0ernment t!ssue n!t$*at!n re/ardn/ the manner n :h*hthe *ensus has t! )e *arred !ut and the Centra+G!0ernment has ssued n!t$*at!ns5 and the*!m'etent auth!rt. has ssued dre*t!ns& It sn!t :thn the d!man !$ the *!urt t! +e/s+ate& The *!urts d! nter'ret the +a: and n su*hnter'retat!n *ertan *reat0e 'r!*ess sn0!+0ed& The *!urts ha0e the ?ursd*t!n t!de*+are the +a: as un*!nsttut!na+& That t!!5:here t s *a++ed $!r& The *!urt ma. a+s! $++ u'the /a's n *ertan s'heres a''+.n/ the d!*trne!$ *!nsttut!na+ s+en*e !r a)e.an*e& 6ut5 the

    60 (2015) 2 SCC 796

    LatestLaws.com

  • 8/19/2019 SC Judgment Laying No Reservation in Promotions for SC-ST

    49/49

    LatestLaws.com

    49

    *!urts are n!t t! '+un/e nt! '!+*.4ma8n/ ). addn/ s!methn/ t! the '!+*. ). :a.s !$ ssun/a :rt !$ mandamus&

    (e ha0e re$erred t! the sad auth!rt. as the *!urt has

    *+ear+. he+d that t nether +e/s+ates n!r d!es t ssue a

    mandamus t! +e/s+ate& The re+e$ n the 'resent *ase5 :hen

    a''!ste+. a''re*ated5 tantam!unts t! a 'ra.er $!r ssue !$ 

    a mandamus t! ta8e a ste' t!:ards $ramn/ !$ a ru+e !r a

    re/u+at!n $!r the 'ur'!se !$ reser0at!n $!r S*hedu+ed

    Castes and S*hedu+ed Tr)es n matter !$ 'r!m!t!ns& In !ur

    *!nsdered !'n!n a :rt !$ mandamus !$ su*h a nature

    *ann!t )e ssued&

    37& C!nse9uent+.5 the (rt Pett!ns5 )en/ de0!d !$ mert5

    stand dsmssed& There sha++ )e n! !rder as t! *!sts&

     

    &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&J&  D'a8 Msra

      &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&J&Ne: De+h Pra$u++a C& PantMar*h 115 -=12

    LatestLaws.com