Upload
chetan-agrawal
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/8/2019 SBM16
1/10
Strategic Visionversus
Strategic Opportunism
8/8/2019 SBM16
2/10
APPROACH There are two very different approaches to the development of successful
strategies and sustainable competitive advantages.
Each can work, but may require very different systems, culture andpeople.
Strategic Vision takes a long term perspective and the focus is on thefuture , both for strategy development and supporting analysis.
Strategic opportunism takes a short term view and the focus is on thepresent benefits.
The argument is that , the best way to have a right strategy tomorrow is tohave it right today. Alternatively, what is a wrong strategy today, is
unlikely to be the rig
ht strategy tomorrow.
8/8/2019 SBM16
3/10
Strategic Vision It requires the following FOURessential elements :
1. Complete clarity about the future strategy.
2. Organization wide acceptance of the correctness ofthe strategy and a commitment to make that visionhappen.
3. Assets, Competencies and Resources to implementthe strategy should be available or made available
in time.4. Willingness to stick to the strategy in the face of
competitive threats and / or enticing opportunitiesthat will divert the resources away from the vision.
8/8/2019 SBM16
4/10
Organizational Characteristics VISION
Forward looking
Watch trends affectingfuture
Build assets over long
periods
Centralized structure
Eye on the ball
OPPORTUNISM
Present knowledge
Current threats andopportunities
Build flexibility and
adaptability
Decentralized
Entrepreneurial eye
8/8/2019 SBM16
5/10
Vision Opportunism MatrixStrategic
Approach
Strategic
Risk
Focus on
Future
VISION STUBBORN-
NESS
Focus on
Present
OPPORTUNISM DRIFT
8/8/2019 SBM16
6/10
Strategic Stubbornness1. The Vision may be faulty and its pursuit may be a wasteful
exercise.
2. The vision may be accurate, but there may be
implementation barriers.3. There may be significant paradigm shifts making the initial
vision redundant.
4. Main reason for the stubbornness is often the initial success.
5.
It is difficult to ch
ange th
e culture with
out ch
anging th
e keypeople as the culture is evolved over time to suit the vision.
6. Nothing succeeds like success & is the chief non-incentive.
8/8/2019 SBM16
7/10
Strategic Opportunism It is driven by the focus on the present.
The environment is so dynamic and uncertain that it is notfeasible to take a long term view.
Unless the business is structured to take strategic advantagein the present , it is unlikely to be strategically successful inthe future.
1. Risk of missed opportunities is minimized.
2. Risk of strategic stubbornness is also reduced.
3. Strategic opportunism makes the people entrepreneurial.
4. Decentralized firms are closer to the market.
5. The reaction time is much lower.
8/8/2019 SBM16
8/10
Strategic Drift Investment decisions are made incrementally
in response to opportunities rather than
directed by a long term vision. As a result, a firm may find itself, after a
while, in a set of totally new businesses, for
which it does not have the requisite assets andcompetencies and which provide little
synergy.
8/8/2019 SBM16
9/10
Risks of Strategic Drift1. Short lived transitory trend or force may be
mistaken for one with enough staying power.
2. Opportunities to create immediate profits may berationalized as strategic, when they are not.
3. Expected synergies across existing and new
opportunistic businesses may fail to materialize
owing to implementation problems.
4. Assets and competencies so built may not support
the core business.
8/8/2019 SBM16
10/10
Dynamic Vision Dynamic Vision is one which can change in
anticipation of emerging paradigm shifts.
This is difficult, but the pay off is huge. Microsofts focus progressed from operating systems
to applications to the internet as the paradigms
changed.
Strategic opportunism can support strategic vision
by managing diversification away from the core
business.