SBM16

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 SBM16

    1/10

    Strategic Visionversus

    Strategic Opportunism

  • 8/8/2019 SBM16

    2/10

    APPROACH There are two very different approaches to the development of successful

    strategies and sustainable competitive advantages.

    Each can work, but may require very different systems, culture andpeople.

    Strategic Vision takes a long term perspective and the focus is on thefuture , both for strategy development and supporting analysis.

    Strategic opportunism takes a short term view and the focus is on thepresent benefits.

    The argument is that , the best way to have a right strategy tomorrow is tohave it right today. Alternatively, what is a wrong strategy today, is

    unlikely to be the rig

    ht strategy tomorrow.

  • 8/8/2019 SBM16

    3/10

    Strategic Vision It requires the following FOURessential elements :

    1. Complete clarity about the future strategy.

    2. Organization wide acceptance of the correctness ofthe strategy and a commitment to make that visionhappen.

    3. Assets, Competencies and Resources to implementthe strategy should be available or made available

    in time.4. Willingness to stick to the strategy in the face of

    competitive threats and / or enticing opportunitiesthat will divert the resources away from the vision.

  • 8/8/2019 SBM16

    4/10

    Organizational Characteristics VISION

    Forward looking

    Watch trends affectingfuture

    Build assets over long

    periods

    Centralized structure

    Eye on the ball

    OPPORTUNISM

    Present knowledge

    Current threats andopportunities

    Build flexibility and

    adaptability

    Decentralized

    Entrepreneurial eye

  • 8/8/2019 SBM16

    5/10

    Vision Opportunism MatrixStrategic

    Approach

    Strategic

    Risk

    Focus on

    Future

    VISION STUBBORN-

    NESS

    Focus on

    Present

    OPPORTUNISM DRIFT

  • 8/8/2019 SBM16

    6/10

    Strategic Stubbornness1. The Vision may be faulty and its pursuit may be a wasteful

    exercise.

    2. The vision may be accurate, but there may be

    implementation barriers.3. There may be significant paradigm shifts making the initial

    vision redundant.

    4. Main reason for the stubbornness is often the initial success.

    5.

    It is difficult to ch

    ange th

    e culture with

    out ch

    anging th

    e keypeople as the culture is evolved over time to suit the vision.

    6. Nothing succeeds like success & is the chief non-incentive.

  • 8/8/2019 SBM16

    7/10

    Strategic Opportunism It is driven by the focus on the present.

    The environment is so dynamic and uncertain that it is notfeasible to take a long term view.

    Unless the business is structured to take strategic advantagein the present , it is unlikely to be strategically successful inthe future.

    1. Risk of missed opportunities is minimized.

    2. Risk of strategic stubbornness is also reduced.

    3. Strategic opportunism makes the people entrepreneurial.

    4. Decentralized firms are closer to the market.

    5. The reaction time is much lower.

  • 8/8/2019 SBM16

    8/10

    Strategic Drift Investment decisions are made incrementally

    in response to opportunities rather than

    directed by a long term vision. As a result, a firm may find itself, after a

    while, in a set of totally new businesses, for

    which it does not have the requisite assets andcompetencies and which provide little

    synergy.

  • 8/8/2019 SBM16

    9/10

    Risks of Strategic Drift1. Short lived transitory trend or force may be

    mistaken for one with enough staying power.

    2. Opportunities to create immediate profits may berationalized as strategic, when they are not.

    3. Expected synergies across existing and new

    opportunistic businesses may fail to materialize

    owing to implementation problems.

    4. Assets and competencies so built may not support

    the core business.

  • 8/8/2019 SBM16

    10/10

    Dynamic Vision Dynamic Vision is one which can change in

    anticipation of emerging paradigm shifts.

    This is difficult, but the pay off is huge. Microsofts focus progressed from operating systems

    to applications to the internet as the paradigms

    changed.

    Strategic opportunism can support strategic vision

    by managing diversification away from the core

    business.