13
SBIR Phase I – Research Plan Ashley Danicic, Justin Miller, Joe McFerron A . Specific Aims According to the US Census Bureau, the population of aging Americans, 50 years old and older, represents about 32.3 percent of the total population. 1 These Americans receive more medical procedures than their younger counterparts and therefore are a target to the health care industry. During a large number of surgeries and other procedures a pulse lavage is utilized. The use of a heated pulse lavage system decreases the instance of infection among patients. Without a heating system, the liquid used to irrigate a wound before and during a procedure is usually room temperature. The temperature of the body is almost 15 o C higher at 37 o C. A precarious result of this temperature change is heat loss to the irrigated tissue. This delays healing and predisposes patients to wound infections. If the solution was heated prior, the risk of infection would greatly decrease. The current methods used to warm the solution are costly, variable, or bulky. The most reliable way to warm the lavage solution is to use a heat exchanger. This device, although effective, is expensive and cumbersome. Most medical grade heat exchangers are priced over 1,000 dollars. 2 Another device used in hospitals to warm the IV solution is a microwave. This method is not recommended because the temperature of the solution cannot be controlled. Also the IV bag (made of PVC) will deform if heated over 180 degrees Fahrenheit, increasing the risk of fluid leak and bag rupture. 3

SBIR Phase I – Research Plan Ashley Danicic, Justin Miller ... › ~gartnerm › 05 › PulsedLavage › Lavage_SBIR.pdfAshley Danicic, Justin Miller, Joe McFerron A . Specific Aims

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • SBIR Phase I – Research Plan

    Ashley Danicic, Justin Miller, Joe McFerron

    A . Specific Aims

    According to the US Census Bureau, the population of aging Americans, 50 years

    old and older, represents about 32.3 percent of the total population.1 These Americans

    receive more medical procedures than their younger counterparts and therefore are a

    target to the health care industry. During a large number of surgeries and other

    procedures a pulse lavage is utilized. The use of a heated pulse lavage system decreases

    the instance of infection among patients.

    Without a heating system, the liquid used to irrigate a wound before and during a

    procedure is usually room temperature. The temperature of the body is almost 15 oC

    higher at 37 oC. A precarious result of this temperature change is heat loss to the irrigated

    tissue. This delays healing and predisposes patients to wound infections. If the solution

    was heated prior, the risk of infection would greatly decrease.

    The current methods used to warm the solution are costly, variable, or bulky. The

    most reliable way to warm the lavage solution is to use a heat exchanger. This device,

    although effective, is expensive and cumbersome. Most medical grade heat exchangers

    are priced over 1,000 dollars. 2

    Another device used in hospitals to warm the IV solution

    is a microwave. This method is not recommended because the temperature of the solution

    cannot be controlled. Also the IV bag (made of PVC) will deform if heated over 180

    degrees Fahrenheit, increasing the risk of fluid leak and bag rupture. 3

  • After calculating the amount of power needed to operate the heater and

    determining the desired warm up temperature, a model of the heated IV bag will be

    made. This model, made in CosmosFloWorks, will be used to determine the time it takes

    to warm the solution from room temperature to the desired temperature. Once the core

    temperature in the modeled IV bag reaches the desired temperature, the simulation will

    be stopped and the time recorded. In order to be competitive with heat exchangers the

    warm up time should be less than 10 minutes.4

    Phase I goals:

    1. Design an electric heating system that can provide heated lavage.

    2. Don’t alter the basic functionality and simplicity of the existing device.

    B. Significance

    Pulse lavage is used as an effective and efficient way to irrigate grossly

    contaminated and saturated wounds. Pulse lavage was first used in the Vietnam War by

    oral surgeons in the U.S. Army. This field experience validated its claims of

    advancement and suitability for such uses. Advancement since Vietnam has brought us

    to current day modern pulse lavage systems. “These units are ideally suited for military

    use as well as clinical use. This is because they allow both first and second-echelon

    medical personnel, as well as nurses and physicians to rapidly and effectively

    decontaminate wounds with little to no logistic burden.” 5

    Pulse lavage also has its place in the fields of orthopedic surgery, particularly total

    joint replacements. Pulse lavage allows the surgical site to be aseptically cleansed with

    saline to remove blood and fat from either the repairable bone or operable tissue. There is

  • a major risk involved in total joint replacement that is dealt with in part by pulse lavage

    as well. As a result of a total joint replacement, implants attract large amounts of

    bacteria. A person’s immune system can have difficulty attacking bacteria that live on

    these implants. If infections go untreated or are resilient, the problem can worsen and

    develop into a situation that becomes systemic. Saline pulse lavage is used to cleanse

    and sterilize the surgical site of such implantations to avoid bacteria from attaching to the

    implants and causing infection post operation.

    One critical flaw can be seen in a modern pulse lavage system: the dispensed

    saline is often at room temperature. Temperature regulation would serve two main

    purposes that are not accounted for in modern units. When in a surgical setting, the local

    area around a wound drops below body temperature due to both exposure and the use of

    room temperature saline via lavage. After surgical procedures, it often takes several

    hours for the site to regain physiological temperature. Since most infectious bacteria are

    able to grow rapidly and efficiently at temperatures below the average 98.6 degrees F,

    this allows a larger block of time in which to grow and spread before the natural

    immunity and temperature of the body are restored. It is at this critical time that bacterial

    growth is most dangerous to the wound site. 6

    A temperature regulator would allow

    solution such as saline to irrigate a wound at a temperature at or near that of the rest of

    the body. This would greatly decrease the length of time at which the bacteria can

    spread, as well as continue to sanitize the area. The temperature settings on the mounted

    heating unit would range from approximately room temperature to body temperature. It

    will be at the judgment of the user as to what temperature he or she feels is appropriate

    for the length and complexity of the procedure. By allowing it to be used at room

  • temperature, this allows for those who do not wish to use the temperature regulator to

    continue using the modified lavage unit just as they had done before. This broadens the

    market appeal.

    The new temperature controlling system will be distributed for applications for

    hospital and clinical use, research and developmental settings, dentistry, as well as

    military medical use. Since no other system to date addresses solution temperature, and

    the new model also incorporates every aspect of previous models, it should be considered

    a superior model for every use.

    C. Relevant Experience

    Joseph Richard McFerron, Ashley Elizabeth Danicic, and Justin Shields Miller

    contributed to this project as co-investigators. Both experimental design and execution

    will be carried out by all. The qualifications of the investigators are listed below.

    Co-Investigator 1

    Joe McFerron is a fourth year undergraduate student at the University of

    Pittsburgh. His undergraduate major is bioengineering with a biomechanics

    concentration. His interests include human body performance as well as full body

    biomechanics. He has limited laboratory experience in controlled laboratory settings as a

    result of his curriculum at the university. He plans to graduate from the university in

    April of 2005.

    Co-Investigator 2

    Ashley Danicic is a fourth year undergraduate student at the University of

    Pittsburgh. Her undergraduate major is bioengineering with a concentration in

  • biotechnology and artificial organs. Her primary interest involves research and

    development in the field of tissue engineering. She has limited laboratory experience in

    controlled laboratory settings as a result of her curriculum at the university. However in

    addition she currently is interning in the Cellomics laboratory and McGowan Institute. In

    particular she remains focused on stem cell research, artificial organs and prosthetics.

    She plans to graduate from the university in December of 2005.

    Co-Investigator 3

    Justin Miller is a fourth year undergraduate student at the University of

    Pittsburgh. His undergraduate major is bioengineering with a biotechnology and artificial

    organs concentration. His interests include natural and synthetic tissue engineering, with

    emphasis on stem cell research and development. He has limited laboratory experience

    in controlled laboratory settings as a result of his curriculum at the university. However

    in addition he currently has an internship working in the Rangos Research Center where

    he researches bone and muscle derived stem cell cultures. He plans to graduate from the

    university in December of 2005.

    D. Experimental Design and Methods

    This project aimed to modify a functional pulse lavage system into one that

    administers a heated saline solution at a controlled temperature. The first step taken was

    procurement and investigation of popular lavage models currently available. One

    similarity between all models quickly became apparent: the devices all connected directly

    to a saline bag and utilized only a small device for the pulsing mechanism (AC/DC pump,

    O2 connection). That is, no external reservoir or complex hardware existed. Since it was

  • imperative not impinge upon the simplicity of an existing device, the following final

    design was proposed.

    The only aspect of the lavage system that needs to be affected is the saline bag

    itself. Therefore, we only concerned ourselves with the heating of the IV bag and no

    direct portion of the lavage. It can be seen that our device is ‘universal’ as it can be used

    to heat any IV bag.

    After deciding to concentrate on bringing a normal 1-liter intravenous saline bag

    to temperatures up to 36°C, the search a proper method of heat transfer began.

    Conduction was concluded to be the simplest and most effective means of heat transfer.

    This requires the source of heat to be in direct contact with the surface of the bag. The

    fact that the shape of the bag is already irregular and that its shape changes as the lavage

    drains fluid from it constrained the options for a heat source. The solution decided upon

    resulted from noticing how pipes are often kept warm. Flexible heaters are used since

    they can be wrapped around a surface and provide more than an adequate amount of heat.

    They are made from various materials that allow for many different applications.

    Research was conducted into an appropriate heater for the project. The first

    aspect considered was power. Eq. 1 was used to get a general estimate for the amount of

    heat required, where ‘P’ is power, ‘m’ is mass of the substance to be heated (1 kg), ‘Cp’ is

    the specific heat of the substance to be heated (4.184 J g-1

    K-1

    ), ‘Tf’ and ‘Ti’ are the final

    and initial temperatures (36°C and 20°C), and ‘t’ is the total time for heating (5 min).

    t

    TTCmP

    ifp

    upwarm

    )(_

    −⋅

    = (1)

  • This provided a thermal envelope of approximately 230 W. More advanced modeling

    and validation was done with Solidworks and Cosmosworks (SolidWorks Corporation,

    Concord, MA). A cylinder the size of a 1-L IV bag was modeled in Solidworks. The

    outer 1 mm was given the properties of PVC and the entirety of the inside was modeled

    as water. The entire outer surface had a uniform heat source totaling 230 W placed on it

    with Cosmosworks. The results after 9 minutes are shown in Figure 1. This was the first

    time point to have a temperature of 36°C at a radius of zero. This model validates that

    our initial estimation of power was generally correct.

    Figure 1, Cross-section view of modeled, heated saline bag after 9 minutes

    120 VAC was chosen to be the electricity source since it is widely available in a

    clinical setting. Other aspects of heater specification include size, which was decided to

    be approximately 6”x10”. This allows for the majority of the surface of a full IV bag to

    be contacted and for contact to remain as the solution is drained during use, given proper

    mounting. Electrocution was a small concern since no moisture is present under normal

  • operation, but it was still considered. Any heater used should therefore be water

    resistant.

    Minco (Minneapolis, MN) supplies many different types and sizes of flexible

    heaters and accessories. To build the initial prototype, Minco part #HR5528R44.1L12B

    was used (Figure 2). It is a 6.9” x 9.0” flexible heater made from Kapton, a water

    resistant material. When fed 120 VAC, it provides 326 watts of total power.

    Figure 2, Photo of flexible heater

    The other aspect of this device is the control. The temperature of the saline

    solution needs to be monitored and the heater needs to be controlled based upon this

    temperature. To provide simple and reliable feedback control, Minco part # CT16A2010

    was used (Figure 3). It monitors any type of thermocouple/thermal ribbon and closes or

    opens a switch depending on the feedback temperature. It allows for straightforward

    operation. It also provides adjustable hysteresis control. That is, the point at which it

    switches on and off is not the same. It switches on at a lower temperature than it

    switches off as to reduce rapid switching.

  • Figure 3, Technical drawing of temperature controller

    The final major component to be decided upon was the temperature sensing

    device. The project required an element that was:

    1. Small enough to allow for an IV-port insertion.

    2. Water-proof, since it would be in direct contact with saline

    3. Be able to be sterilized, since saline make contact with the body

    Minco again provided this element, part # S665PDY40B (Figure 4). It is a thermal

    ribbon with a platinum sensing element encased in a polyimide film with elastomer cover

    coat. It makes accurate temperature readings with a fast response time, is small enough

    for port insertion, is water-proof and the elastomer can be sterilized.

    Figure 4, Photo (left) and technical drawing (right) of thermal ribbon

    The general outline of the control mechanism is presented in Figure 5. The

    temperature controller is constantly making readings of and displaying the IV

    temperature via the thermal ribbon. If the temperature is below the hysterisis-

    compensated set-point temperature (variable from 1 to 25 °C below desired temperature),

  • the SSR (relay) output is switched on. If the temperature is above the set-point, the

    output is switched off. The SSR output is fed 9V via battery which subsequently drives

    an additional 120 VAC relay when switched on. This second relay switches electricity

    on and off to the heater.

    Figure 5, Schematic of control

    The controller was mounted in a bud box along with a master switch, battery,

    relay, and plugs for outlet power, thermocouple input, and heater output (Figure 6).

    Temperature Controller

    Heating Element

    120 VAC

    Temperature Sensor

    IV Bag

    Relay

    9 V

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    1—Display

    2—Controls

    3—Main Switch

    4—Thermal Ribbon Input

    5—Heater Output

    6—Main Power Input

    Figure 6, Photos of front (left) and rear (right) of controlling box

  • Verification testing consisted of a setup resembling a clinical setting. The heater

    was securely attached. The method of attachment for this prototype was simple plastic

    clips, which provided steady, firm contact between the heater and the surface of the bag.

    The thermal ribbon was fed from through the top of the IV bag via small hole, with the

    sensing element remaining 1cm above the bottom edge of the bag. The ambient

    temperature was 20 °C. The device was set for a desired temperature of 36 deg C.

    Figure 7 displays the results of this test. The temperature of the bag rises in nearly a

    linear manner to 36 °C in 7 minutes at which time the heater is turned off. The high

    specific heat of water allows for the saline to retain its temperature for a relatively long

    amount of time. It wasn’t until t=24.5 minutes until the temperature dropped below 35

    °C at which point the heater turned back on. The results of this test show that the device

    is in fact a viable solution to heat an IV bag to and remain at a controlled temperature.

    This test yielded a few concerns though. Although the outside of the heater is

    insulated, its temperature became quite hot, exceeding 50°C at some points. Even brief

    contact could cause burns to the user. This needs to be addressed; the best solution

    would likely be additional insulation. Also, the placement of the thermal ribbon is very

    important. The difference in temperature between the center of the bag and the outer

    edge of the bag was up to 5°C and the difference between the bottom and top was up to

    9°C. Therefore, a better attachment system and detailed instructions to caregivers need to

    be considered. The proper thermal ribbon attachment mechanism is believed to be via IV

    port and attached to a rigid rod that would guarantee correct placement.

  • Time vs. Temperature, Heating from 21 °C

    20

    22

    24

    26

    28

    30

    32

    34

    36

    38

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600

    Time (sec)

    Tem

    pera

    ture

    (°C

    )

    Figure 7

    Other useful improvements include a well though-out method of attaching the

    heater to the bag. The current solution of plastic ties is marginal at best, as draining the

    bag lowers the tension of attachment and reduces the surface area of heater contact.

    Some sort of elastic tie would allow for good heater-bag contact throughout the use of a

    bag. A customized controller circuit would also provide for reduced weight and size of

    the overall device as the current controller possess many features that are not utilized.

  • Works Cited 1. http://www.census.gov/

    2.http://sales.varian.com/webapp/commerce/command/CategoryDisplay?cgmenbr=

    1&cgrfnbr=2&cgname=Heat%20Exchangers

    3. http://plc.cwru.edu/tutorial/enhanced/files/polymers/therm/therm.htm

    4. http://www.surgicaloncology.com/psmmeth.htm

    5. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&

    db=PubMed&list_uids=9866365&dopt=Abstract

    6. http://www.disknet.com/indiana_biolab/b062.htm