40
Saying the Same Thing

Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

  • View
    230

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Saying the Same Thing

Page 2: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Concepts • Counting by

– Sentence token

– Sentence type

– Proposition

– Statement

• Synonomy

• Ambiguity• Context Dependence

• Sense

• Reference

• Indexical

Page 3: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

What we’re doing here

• Arguing that there are necessary truths

• Explaining how sentences have meaning in virtue of the “families” to which they belong

• Noting that the meaning of a sentence depends on the language in which it figures and, sometimes, its context of utterance.

Page 4: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Different Ways of Counting

8 individual objects

Page 5: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Different Ways of Counting

3 colors

Page 6: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Different Ways of Counting

2 shapes

Page 7: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Are they the same?

Same shape,Different color

Different shape,Same color

The Moral: we can count things in different ways, and come up with different correct answers when counting the same objects.

There are 4 individual objects, 3 colors and 2 shapes represented in this picture.

Page 8: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Count the letters . . .

BANANA

Page 9: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Counting by TYPE

BBAANNAANNAA

There are 3 letters of the alphabet in “banana”

Page 10: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Counting by TOKEN

BBAANNAANNAA

There are 6 individual letters in “banana”

Page 11: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Type/Token Ambiguity

• “My husband and I drive the same car.”

• “Tweedledee and Tweedledum are identical twins.”

Page 12: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

2 sentence tokens - 1 sentence type

1. John is Paul’s brother

2. John is Paul’s brother

1. John is Paul’s brother

2. John is Paul’s brother

TYPE and TOKEN aren’t different kinds of things like apples and oranges--they’re just two different ways of counting the same things.

We can count sentences by token or by type.

Page 13: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

1 proposition

1. John is Paul’s brother

2. John is Paul’s brother

3. John is the male sibling of Paul

1. John is Paul’s brother

2. John is Paul’s brother

3. John is the male sibling of Paul

1, 2 and 3 express the same proposition because they have they have the same sense, i.e. dictionary-meaning. They are synonymous.

Counting by PROPOSITION is another way of counting sentences

Page 14: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

What are propositions really???

• Equivalence class

– example: denominations of bills

• We can group things in different ways

• Equivalence relation

– reflexive

– symmetric

– transitive

Page 15: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Equivalence Class

• 14 bills – 4 denominations

• More about equivalence classes here

Page 16: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Synonomy

You should eschew obfuscation.

You should avoid obscurity.

Snow is white.

Owsnay isay itewhay.

Sentences are synonymous

when they express the same

proposition.

tomato

tomAHto

Page 17: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Ambiguity

I’m high!

Flying planes can be dangerous.

A sentence is ambiguous when it can be

used to express different propositions.

Page 18: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Context Dependence

A sentence is context dependent when what it says depends upon the context of utterance, that is where, when, by whom and in what circumstances it is said.

Examples of context dependent sentences

• I am a philosopher

• Los Angeles is to the north of here

• It’s 10 am now.

• This dang thing is heavy!

Page 19: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

I’m aphilosopher

I’m aphilosopherI’m a

philosopherI’m a

philosopher

Plato is a philosopher

Aristotle is a philosopher

Plato and Aristotle saying that they’re philosophers

Page 20: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Indexicals

• Words whose reference changes systematically depending on where, when, by whom and in what circumstances they are uttered.

• Examples: I, you, he, today, yesterday, tomorrow, here, there, this, that, now…

Page 21: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Sense/ReferenceDistinction

• “meaning” is ambiguous!

– “bachelor” means “unmarried male who never has been married.

– I mean him!

• Frege “Auf Sinn und Bedeuting”

• Sense: dictionary-meaning

• Reference: “aboutness”, picking out

Page 22: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Sense and Reference

squaresquare

square

sense

reference

Page 23: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Same Statement

• Sentences make the same statement when they say the same thing about the same thing.

• Example

1. 50 is even.

2. The number of states in the US is even.

• 1 is always true but2 was not true in 1812!

• Sentences make the same statement when they say the same thing about the same thing.

• Example

1. 50 is even.

2. The number of states in the US is even.

• 1 is always true but2 was not true in 1812!

1812 Flag1812 Flag

Page 24: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Example: A Question from an Old Quiz

It’s my shoe.

It’s my shoe.

It’s my shoe.It’s my shoe.

It’s your shoe.

It’s your shoe.

Page 25: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Which sentences say the same thing?

1. [stated Sep 12, 2013] Today is Thursday.

2. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Today is Thursday.

3. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Yesterday was Thursday.

1. [stated Sep 12, 2013] Today is Thursday.

2. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Today is Thursday.

3. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Yesterday was Thursday.

It depends on how you count!

Page 26: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Same proposition/different statements

1. [stated Sep 12, 2013] Today is Thursday.

2. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Today is Thursday.

3. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Yesterday was Thursday.

1. [stated Sep 12, 2013] Today is Thursday.

2. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Today is Thursday.

3. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Yesterday was Thursday.

1 and 2 have the same sense--same dictionary-meaning

Page 27: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Same statement/different propositions

1. [stated Sep 12, 2013] Today is Thursday.

2. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Today is Thursday.

3. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Yesterday was Thursday.

1. [stated Sep 12, 2013] Today is Thursday.

2. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Today is Thursday.

3. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Yesterday was Thursday.

1 and 3 don’t have the same dictionary-meaning but they pick out the same day.

They say the same thing about the same thing.

Page 28: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Translating into timeless sentences

1. [stated Sep 12, 2013] Today is Thursday.

2. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Today is Thursday.

3. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Yesterday was Thursday.

1. [stated Sep 12, 2013] Today is Thursday.

2. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Today is Thursday.

3. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Yesterday was Thursday.

1’ Sep 12, 2013 is a Thursday.

2’ Sep 13, 2013 is a Thursday.

1’ Sep 12, 2013 is a Thursday.

2’ Sep 13, 2013 is a Thursday.

Page 29: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

1. [stated Sep 12, 2013] Today is Thursday.

2. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Today is Thursday.

3. [stated Sep 13, 2013] Yesterday was Thursday.

1’ Sep 12, 2013 is a Thursday.

2’ Sep 13, 2013 is a Thursday.

context-dependent

not context-dependent

We can translate context-dependent sentences into sentences that are not context-dependent

Page 30: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Remember her?

Page 31: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Summing up so far…• We distinguished different ways of counting sentences

– by sentence token

– by sentence type

– by proposition

– by statement

• We noted that some sentences were context-dependent because they included indexicals but

• that they could be translated into context-independent sentences.

Page 32: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

When we ask whether two sentences (or speakers) are “saying the same thing” we need to be clear about what we’re asking.

• Expressing the same proposition?

• Making the same statement?

• Uttering the same noises (or making the same marks)?

The Moral of the Story

Page 33: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

A Puzzle About Necessary Truths

How We Argue in Philosophy

• When we want to argue for a thesis we need to respond to objections

• So sometimes we consider an argument for something we want to show is false

• In order to refute it

• We will consider a bad argument that is supposed to show there are no necessary truths

• And refute it

Page 34: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Bad argument(supposed to show there are no necessary truths)

2 + 2 = 4 - true

2 + 2 = 5 - false

English

4 = ****

5 = *****

Actual World

2 + 2 = 4 - false

2 + 2 = 5 - true

English*

4 = *****

5 = ****

W*

Page 35: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

This argument can be generalized!

• It is contingent that any given word has the sense it does: we can change language!

• So it seems there can be no necessary truths!

• But this is crazy: changing language doesn’t change the world! So we have to respond to this threat!

Page 36: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

2 + 2 = 42 + 2 = 42 + 2 = 52 + 2 = 5

** + ** = ****** + ** = ****

** + ** = ****** + ** = ****

English-Speaker English*-Speaker

They’re making the different noises…

but expressing the same mathematical truth!

Page 37: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

2 + 2 = 42 + 2 = 42 + 2 = 42 + 2 = 4

** + ** = ******* + ** = *****

** + ** = ****** + ** = ****

English-Speaker English*-Speaker

Now they’re making the same noises…

but expressing the different mathematical propositions!

Page 38: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Changing language doesn’t change the world!

2 + 2 = 4 - true

2 + 2 = 5 - false

English

4 = ****

5 = *****

Actual World

2 + 2 = 4 - false

2 + 2 = 5 - true

English*

4 = *****

5 = ****

W*

** + ** = ****** + ** = *****

True

False

Page 39: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Lincoln’s Riddle

If you call a tail a leg, then how many legs does a dog have?

Page 40: Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference

Changing language doesn’t change the world!

Four.Calling a tail aleg doesn’t makeit one.

Four.Calling a tail aleg doesn’t makeit one.

The EndThe End