SANTA TERESA COUNTY PARK - Santa Clara County, California · 2013-09-30 · Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan Process 3 II. Process PROCESS • Throughout the process

SANTA

TERESA

COUNTY

PARKHISTORIC AREA

SITE PLAN

Approved December 15, 2009

Bellinger Foster Steinmetz Landscape Architecture

Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan Table of Contents

iTable Of Contents

Part I. Project Introduction/Description ......................................................................................................... Page 1

Part II. Process ........................................................................................................................................ Page 3

Part III. Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................................... Page 6

Part IV. Site Plan and Design Elements ......................................................................................................... Page 10

Appendix A. Costs ......................................................................................................................................... Page 24

Appendix B. Public Meeting Minutes .................................................................................................................. Page 32

Table of Contents Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan

iiAcknowledgements

Donald F. Gage, District IGeorge Shirakawa, District IIDave Cortese, District III Ken Yeager, District IV Liz Kniss, District V

Jeffery V. Smith, County Executive

Jan Hintermeister, ChairpersonGreg WestJohn GibbsSparky HarlanSteve MunzelKris WangSusie BrainDan Murillo

Bellinger Foster Steinmetz, Landscape Architecture Lee Steinmetz, Principal Elke Ikeda, Project Manager

David J. Powers and Associates Kristy Le, Project Manager

H.T. Harvey and AssociatesCarey and CompanyHolman & AssociatesHexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Lisa Killough, Director (Through December 2009)Jim O’Connor, Deputy DirectorJulie Mark, Deputy Director

Antoinette Romeo, Planner and Project ManagerNational Park Service – Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail Stanley Bond Naomi TorresRobin Schaut, Interpretive Program ManagerJulie Lee, Senior Park RangerEric Goodrich, Park Ranger SupervisorDrew Merry, Senior Park Maintenance WorkerMark Frederick, Capital Program ManagerJane Mark, Senior PlannerEd Souza, Administrative Services ManagerDana Peak, Planner, Santa Clara County, Department of Planning and Development

District I, Greg WestDistrict II, Sparky HarlanDistrict III, Steve MunzelDistrict IV, Jan HintermeisterDistrict V, Kris Wang

At Large Appointees (appointed by Liz Kniss) Susie Brain(appointed by Don Gage) John Gibbs, Dan Murillo

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT

SANTA TERESA COUNTY PARK

HISTORIC AREA SITE PLAN

PROJECT TEAM

PARKS AND RECREATION

COMMISSIONERSLEAD

CONSULTANT

SUBCONSULTANTS

PARKS AND RECREATION

COMMISSIONS

Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan Project Description

1I. Project Description

INTRODUCTION

The mission of the Santa Clara Parks and Recreation Department (County Parks) is to provide, protect, and preserve regional parklands for the enjoyment, education, and inspirational of this and future generations. The vision of County Parks is to create a growing and diverse system of regional parks, trails, and open spaces of Countywide significance that connects people with the natural environment, offers visitor experiences that renew the human spirit, and balances recreation opportunities with resource protection.

In 2003, the County Board of Supervisors adopted the Strategic Plan for the Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation System, stating that County Parks “is charged with the dual mission of protecting and preserving the natural and historic resources of the County Park system and of providing recreation opportunities and facilities for public use.”1

PURPOSE

The purpose of the Historic Area Site Plan is to incorporate interpretive themes, history, and elements of the Native American (Ohlone), Settlement (transition period between the Ohlone and settlers that came into Alta California from Mexico), and California Rancho periods integrating these with existing Historic Area sites (Santa Teresa Spring and Bernal-Gulnac-Joice Ranch). These interpretive themes, history and elements, all of which were identified in the 1999 Rancho Santa Teresa Historic District Interpretive Plan, are incorporated into the site plan design.

1 County of Santa Clara Parks and Recreation Department. Strategic Plan for the Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation System. 5 August 2003. Page 34.

LOCATION

The nine-acre project site is within the approximately 18.5-acre Santa Teresa County Historic Area (Historic Area). The Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation Commission approved the naming of this area of Santa Teresa County Park as “Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area,” for its rich historic and archeological resources in May 2001. In addition to the project site, the Historic Area consists of the existing, developed Santa Teresa Spring and Bernal-Gulnac-Joice Ranch sites which are west of the project site. The Historic Area also includes undeveloped properties which were purchased after the development of the Santa Teresa County Park Master Plan (MP) approved by the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors in April 1992. This project represents an expansion of the Park’s Historic Area. The Historic Area is part of the larger 1,688-acre Santa Teresa County Park.

Project Description Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan

2HISTORIC AREA AND PROJECT SITE

Bear Tree Placque

Jocoba Bernal House

Ignacio Bernal House Site

Jacoba Bernal Garage

Pedro Bernal House

Santa Teresa Spring

Manila Drive

Curie Drive

H

ea to

nM

oo

reD

rive

Man

ila

Way

San

Ign

acioA

ve

Norred Trail

Santa TeresaSp

rings Trail

Joice

Trail

East Barn

Bear Tree

Ca

min

oV

erd

eD

riv

e

Barn

Bernal-Gulnac-Joice House

Joice House

Barn

l

"L" Barn

"U" Barn

l

rear yard

outbuilding

western outbuilding

eastern outbuilding

central outbuilding

rear yard masonary structures

l

l

l

ll

l

This map generated by the County of Santa Clara Department of Parks and Recreation. The GIS files were compiled from various sources.

While deemed reliable, the Department assumes no liability.

Date: July 22, 2008

Created By: A.Romeo

Santa Teresa County Park - Historic Area & Historic Area Site Plan Project Site

Ü

Note: Historic Area boundary is approximate. Though not depicted, boundary excludes easements.

Legend

Santa Teresa County Park

Project Site

Approximate Historic Area Boundary

l Historic sites - existing

Other Structures - existingl

Source: Santa Clara County Parks, 7/22/08.

Note: Historic Area boundary is approximate.

Though not depicted, boundary excludes easements.

HISTORIC AREA AND PROJECT SITE FIGURE 1.0-1

3

Scale:0 190 380 570 76095

Feet

Bear Tree Placque

Jocoba Bernal House



Pedro Bernal House

Santa Teresa Spring

Manila Drive

Curie Drive

H

ea to

nM

oo

reD

rive

Man

ila

Way

San

Ign

acioA

ve

Norred Trail

Santa TeresaSp

rings Trail

Joice

Trail

East Barn

Bear Tree

Ca

min

oV

erd

eD

riv

e

Barn


Joice House

Barn

l

"L" Barn

"U" Barn

l

rear yard

outbuilding

western outbuilding

eastern outbuilding

central outbuilding

rear yard masonary structures

l

l

l

ll

l

This map generated by the County of Santa Clara Department of Parks and Recreation. The GIS files were compiled from various sources.

While deemed reliable, the Department assumes no liability.

Date: July 22, 2008

Created By: A.Romeo

Santa Teresa County Park - Historic Area & Historic Area Site Plan Project Site

Ü


Legend

Santa Teresa County Park

Project Site

Approximate Historic Area Boundary

l Historic sites - existing

Other Structures - existingl

Source: Santa Clara County Parks, 7/22/08.

Note: Historic Area boundary is approximate.

Though not depicted, boundary excludes easements.

HISTORIC AREA AND PROJECT SITE FIGURE 1.0-1

3

Scale:0 190 380 570 76095

Feet


Santa Teresa Spring


Barn

Joice House

Barn

Norred Trail

Joice Trail

Bear Tree Placque

Bear Tree“L” Barn

“U” Barn

Eastern Outbuilding

Central Outbuilding

Rear YardOutbuilding

Western OutbuildingRear Yard Masonry Structures


Jacoba Bernal House


Pedro Bernal House

MANILA DRIVE

CURIE DRIVE

MA

NIL

A W

AY

CAM

INO

VER

DE

DRI

VE

SAN

IGN

ACIO

AVENU

E

DRIVE

MO

ORE

HEATO

N

Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan Process

3II. Process

PROCESS

Throughout the process there were opportunities for public input:•

The Parks and Recreation Commission meeting (June 4, 2008, October 1, 2008, September 2, 2009), County Historical Heritage Commission meeting (August 21, 2008 and February 19, 2009), community meetings (May 8, 2008 and October 16, 2008), CEQA community meeting (August 2009), Housing Land Use, Environmental and Transportation Committee (HLUET) meeting, (October 15, 2009), Board of Supervisors meeting (December 15, 2009)

Coordination and outreach occurred with public agencies:•

City of San Jose and local schools and school districts, National Park Service - Juan Bautista De Anza National Historic Trail (project team member), State Office of Historic Preservation, Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD), Santa Clara County Open Space Authority (SCCOSA)

Furthermore focused outreach included:•

State Native American Heritage Commission, Native American Representatives, Friends of Santa Teresa (FOST), Santa Teresa Foothills Neighborhood Association (STFNA)

Contacts with representatives from other organizations included:•

Los Californianos, El Grito de la Cultura, Old Mission Dolores, VTA’s Hispanic American Heritage event committee, Hispanic Foundation of Silicon Valley, Geneological and Historical Society of Santa Clara County, University of Santa Clara California Studies Initiative, Paul Bernal (Bernal Family member), Patrick Joice (last owner and resident of Bernal-Gulnac-Joice Ranch site)

Process Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan

4

Site Visits

Meetings with County Staff

Meetings with County Staff

Site Inventory & Analysis

Opportunities/Constraints

Existing Conditions Summary

Goals Design Program

Biotic Constraints Report

Archaeological Literature Review

Historic Resources Constraints Analysis

Transportation Constraints Analysis

Staff Review Meeting


Reviews of Existing

Documents

Public Input Public Input

Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan Process

5

Alternative Site Designs

Parks & RecreationCommission

Housing, Land Use, Environment, and

Transportation Committee (HLUET)

Board of Supervisors

Final Site Design&

Design Elements

CEQA Review

Public Input




Refinement

Approvals

Refinement

Public Input Public Input Public Input

Goals and Objectives Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan

6III. Goals and Objectives

GOALS

Purpose: Develop a Preferred Alternative Site Plan for the Native American, Settlement and Californio Rancho Portions of the Rancho Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area

The following goals and objectives are intended to guide the site plan development process.

Themes

1. Use the overall theme of “water” to guide design and to reveal the following to park visitors.

• The spring as the “source” of attracting people to this area.• The relationship of settlement and the availability of water. Reflect the

importance of the spring (water) to the people who once lived at the site.

• The use and importance of water in Ohlone, Settlement and Californio Rancho periods. Demonstrate the role that water played in the evolution of site uses.

• Integrate interpretive themes and elements of the Native American, Settlement and Californio Rancho periods based on the existing “Santa Teresa County Park Rancho Santa Teresa Historic District Interpretive Plan” (Nov 1, 1999).

2. A secondary theme is the cultural and ethnic diversity that contributed to the history of California during the Settlement and Californio Rancho periods.

• The site as part of the Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail• The various ethnic groups that were represented on the Anza

Expedition and settled in California.

History

3. Design for and interpret three time periods: Ohlone, Settlement and Californio Rancho.

• Interpretation and spaces should allow for hands-on exploration and experiences of the time periods. Park visitors should get a sense of what it would have been like to have lived and worked in the interpreted time periods.

• Coordinate and integrate new design elements with the existing developed portions of the Historic Area, Santa Teresa Spring and American Ranch. The design approach for new design elements should be consistent with the existing American Ranch site. Visiting the existing (American Ranch) and new interpreted sites should provide a continuum of “walking through time”.

• The design should provide an overview of the pre-historic and historic uses of the site, way of life and processes.

Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan Goals and Objectives

7

Environment

4. Design to reflect, preserve and enhance existing site environmental and cultural resources.

• Integrate existing structures and potential new structures into historic themes and desired functions/intended uses, while protecting site resources (Adobe structure desired).

Function

5. Provide facilities for a multitude of educational and functional site needs.

• Design for pedestrian and vehicular movement, car and bus staging, and trail connectivity to existing park sites and trails as well as neighborhood/regional trails.

• Provide facilities for educational needs.• Provide necessary conveniences for public use.• Provide for maintenance storage needs.• Make park as safe and vandal proof as possible.• Prevent/resolve conflicts between park land uses and residential

neighborhood needs.

Regulatory

6. Ensure design complies with established requirements and guidelines.

• Incorporate ADA requirements into design where feasible.• Meet goals defined in the Santa Teresa County Park Master Plan

(April 1992).• Be consistent with Santa Clara County General Plan 1995-2010

policies, approved December 20,1994).• Comply with City of San Jose development standards and General

Plan.• Be consistent with the County Parks Strategic Plan.• Coordinate with SCVWD (canal ownership).

Process

7. Solicit input from a wide range of park users and interest groups.

• Incorporate general public and interest group input into site design process.

• Park character, historic interpretation and functional elements should reflect the input of the community where appropriate and be consistent with established County Parks standards, goals and policies.

Goals and Objectives Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan

8

HISTORY - A TIME LINE

Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan Goals and Objectives

9

THEME: “IT’S THE WATER”

= Water-themed features.

Site Plan and Design Elements Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan

10

SITE PLAN

IV. Site Plan and Design Elements

Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan Site Plan and Design Elements

11

FINAL SITE PLAN DESIGN ELEMENTS

1. Ohlone Zone:

• Group Picnic Shelters with 2 picnic tables each that reflect shape and arrangement of an Ohlone village

• Water Theme: Dry creek bed with boulders and temporary water source (detention area/bio-swale during wet season)

• Restored oak wood lands• Restored native grass lands• Stabilized DG or Soil for gathering areas/walks• Petroglyph Icon gathering area with seating boulders around 3

sides• Boulder cluster reflective of acorn grinding areas• Boulder cluster for seating at edge of creek for demonstrations like

acorn meal washing and other water related activities• Interpretive displays• Trash receptacles/recycling


12

1

2 3

4

5

Legend

1. “Village Layout”

2. Contemporary shelter interpretation.

3. Petroglyph symbol finds expression in meeting circle.

4. Shelters will be used for individual, family, and group events.

5. Programs for children might include acorn meal washing.

OHLONE ZONE


13

OHLONE ZONELegend

1. Boulders at “creek” edge will mimic preferred village setting.

Boulders were used for grinding seeds and acorns.

2. A vegetated dry creek bed that also functions as a drainage

swale, demonstrates the creek as a source of life for Native

Americans.

3. Existing oak studded hillside will be expanded. Acorns were

a primary food source.

4. Vegetation along the ”creek” takes advantage of

seasonal run-off and programmed water related events.

1 2

3

4


14

2. Settlement Zone:

• The “cross roads” with an interpretive central globe feature (3 dimensional) demonstrating convergence of different cultures

• 2 shade structures with 2 picnic tables each and interpretive displays

• Trash receptacles/recycling• Water Theme: Water feature emerging out of boulders and running

under bridge• Wooden bridge (rough timber)

3. Archaeologically sensitive area:

• Tree buffer planting at residential edge• Restored native grass lands• Water Theme: Sedge/“wetland” along walk way• Relocated bear tree monument• Fence along western edge of trail• Bench seating in tree shaded area by bear tree• Trash receptacles/recycling• Park sign at Curie Drive entry point


15

SETTLEMENT ZONE

Legend

1. A recirculating water feature symbolizes the source waters of the

creek.

2. The bridge reminds the site user that human intervention was

becoming more prevalent as people were integrating into the Upper

Peninsula.

3. People from all over the world were starting to populate California. A

3-dimensional globe displaying allows the park users to retrace their

routes.

1

2

3


16

4. Californio Rancho Zone:

• Visitor Center with rooms per design program, single story, contemporary interpretation of rancho style house

• Extended roof/trellis element at court yard side (shade structure)• Gate in adobe wall • Vegetable/herb garden on south side• Small pole trellis in vegetable/herb garden• Hornito (small clay oven) on edge of vegetable/herb garden• Ornamental garden on north side with bench seating• Some ornamental fruit trees• Water Theme: Masonry well with bucket/rope mechanism (needs

lockable grate) • Hitching post• Stabilized DG or Soil for courtyard areas & walks• 3 courtyard oaks• Restored barn for displays and maintenance/storage (west side

for storage of maintenance equipment and adobe wall making supplies)

• Circular side yard on west side for adobe brick program; second water source: stone trough (water theme)

• Adobe wall between Jacoba Bernal House and courtyard and towards parking lot; some areas with pole trellis and shade structures. Consider adobe wall height for security and visibility

• Interpretive displays• Benches• Trash receptacles/recycling• Drinking fountain mounted on outside wall of visitor center• Jacoba Bernal House signage


17

CALIFORNIO RANCHO ZONELegend

1.,2. Water from the well is used to water the ani-

mals and to make Adobe bricks.

3.,4.,5. A contemporary or traditional style visitor

center will provide space for exhibits, lec-

tures, events, and restrooms.

2

3

54

1


18

CALIFORNIO RANCHO ZONE

1 5

2

6

4

3

Legend

1. A tree shaded courtyard will be an important

component of the Visitor Center.

2. & 4. Horizontal and vegetable gardens will speak

to the functional and aesthetic need of early

settlers.

3. & 5. A hornitos oven and well provided for daily

needs.

6. Water has always been precious, contained in

a trough it used to water animals.


19

5. Jacoba Bernal House:

• Relocated drive entry• Fence along sidewalk and park entry• Planting buffer towards park at entry off Curie Drive• New adobe wall with trellis per #4

6. Curie Drive:

• Bus drop-off/parking (large enough for bus parking and individual bus pull-in and take-off) with extended sidewalk to curb to accommodate bus passenger activities

• Relocate bear tree monument towards bear tree• New parkway with tree and ground cover plantings and sidewalks• Existing driveway with 2 palm trees becomes park entry from Curie

Drive and maintenance access road• Fence along sidewalk• Bicycle rack at park entry• Trash receptacles at park entry• Directional signage


20

7. Staging Area:

• Stalls for 40 cars including 2 accessible parking spaces• Organic shape with vegetated central detention swale median• 5’ wide walkway around entire parking lot with tie-ins at Curie Drive

sidewalk• 12’ wide entrance connection to visitor center with ADA ramp from

parking lot• 5’ wide connection to San Ignacio Avenue sidewalk with directional

signage• Starting point for Ohlone trail• Directional signage• Bicycle racks at entry points• Trash receptacles/recycling• Trash bin enclosure tucked into median• Park sign at Curie Drive entry point• Park sign at San Ignacio Avenue entry point SA

N IG

NA

CIO

AVE

NU

E


21

STAGING AREA

1 2

3Legend

1. Accessible sidewalks and trails throughout the site ensure easy access

for all visitors.

2. A vegetated median island provides for water purification and ground

water recharge.

3. “Broken” curbs channel surface run-off into the median island.


22

8. Sidewalk Extension

• Extend existing sidewalk per City of San Jose standards to create a connection to Norred Trail (via Mine Trail trail-head at the mounted Ranger Unit)


23

9. Connection trail to early American Ranch site:

• Slope side plantings with oaks, native chaparral and some restored native grassland

• Fence along street side• Point of entry at large oak across from Manila Way• Interpretive display station• Bicycle rack at oak entry point • Park sign at Manila Way entry point

10. General:

• Use porous paving where feasible.• Provide security lighting throughout site, especially at structures. Provide higher

level activity lighting at courtyard for special events.• Consider visibility into site when selecting planting, especially along site

edges. Select trees that can be limbed up and avoid large-size shrubs that block visibility.

• Avoid picnic tables along property edges that may become night-time “hangout” spaces.

• Do not obstruct potential trail corridor to possible future Norred Trail connection

• Underground power lines on site where feasible• Where feasible and desirable to protect potential archaeological resources,

consider constructing trails and other site features on existing grades to minimize excavation.

MANILA DRIVE

Appendix A. Costs Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan

24Appendix A. Costs

Santa

Tere

sa C

ounty

Park

His

toric A

rea S

ite P

lan

Bel

lin

ger

Fos

ter

Ste

inm

etz

Pag

e 1

of 8

Es

tim

ate

of

Pro

ba

ble

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Co

sts

/Sit

e w

ork

Pro

ject

Sa

nta

Te

resa

Co

un

ty P

ark

Estim

ate

Sta

tus:

Pro

j. #

:0

7.0

91

Re

fere

nce

Dra

win

g:

Site

Pla

n

Da

te:

Fe

bru

ary

2,

20

09

By:

EI

Ch

ecke

d b

y:

LS

ite

m d

es

cri

pti

on

qu

an

tity

un

it c

os

tit

em

to

tal

su

bto

tal

1.

OH

LO

NE

ZO

NE

De

mo

liti

on C

lea

r a

nd

Gru

b6

8,2

00

SF

$0

.25

$1

7,0

50

$1

7,0

50

Ea

rth

wo

rk a

nd

Gra

din

g

Ero

sio

n C

on

tro

l1

LS

$1

,50

0.0

0$

1,5

00

Ro

ug

h G

rad

ing

46

6C

Y$

20

.00

$9

,31

9

Fin

e G

rad

ing

20

,00

0S

F$

0.2

5$

5,0

00

Dirt

Exca

va

tio

n (

Dry

Cre

ek B

ed

)3

19

CY

$2

5.0

0$

7,9

72

Ba

se

Exca

va

tio

n (

Tra

ils)

10

9C

Y$

15

.00

$1

,64

2$

25

,43

3

Dra

ina

ge

4"

Sa

nita

ry S

ew

er

35

0L

F$

64

.50

$2

2,5

75

8"

Sto

rm D

rain

40

0L

F$

33

.50

$1

3,4

00

Ca

tch

Ba

sin

6E

A$

2,3

35

.00

$1

4,0

10

1"

Do

me

stic W

ate

r L

ine

17

5L

F$

20

.00

$3

,50

0$

53

,48

5

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Sta

bili

ze

d D

eco

mp

ose

d G

ran

ite

(4

" D

ep

th)

13

,56

0S

F$

6.0

0$

81

,36

0

Ge

ote

xtile

fa

bric (

Dry

Cre

ek B

ed

)5

,74

0S

F$

0.1

5$

86

1

Riv

er

Co

bb

le2

,50

0S

F$

1.0

0$

2,5

00

Re

cycle

d P

lastic H

ea

de

rbo

ard

, 2

" x 4

"9

00

LF

$5

.00

$4

,50

0

La

nd

sca

pe

Bo

uld

er

77

EA

$3

50

.00

$2

6,9

50

Un

de

rgro

un

d U

tilit

ies

55

0L

F$

10

0.0

0$

55

,00

0

Oh

lon

e M

aze

(F

lag

sto

ne

Ba

nd

s)

26

0S

F$

35

.00

$9

,10

0

Str

uctu

res

6E

A$

25

,00

0.0

0$

15

0,0

00

$3

30

,27

1

Irri

ga

tio

n

Ro

ot

Wa

terin

g S

yste

m (

2/t

ree

)1

22

EA

$5

5.0

0$

6,7

10

Bu

bb

lers

/ P

op

-up

bu

bb

lers

15

0E

A$

40

.00

$6

,00

0

Qu

ick C

ou

ple

rs3

EA

$2

50

.00

$7

50

Ma

in L

ine

- 1

-1/2

"6

50

LF

$5

.50

$3

,57

5

So

len

oid

va

lve

- (

up

to

1 1

/2")

6E

A$

60

0.0

0$

3,6

00

Ga

te V

alv

e1

EA

$5

00

.00

$5

00

$2

1,1

35

Pla

nti

ng

So

il P

rep

ara

tio

n2

2,5

50

SF

$0

.25

$5

,63

8

Hyd

rose

ed

- N

ative

Gra

ss M

ix1

9,5

50

SF

$0

.15

$2

,93

3

Pla

ntin

g9

,15

0S

F$

2.5

0$

22

,87

5

Tre

es -

15

Ga

l.6

1E

A$

35

0.0

0$

21

,35

0

Mu

lch

- c

hip

pe

d b

ark

42

CY

$6

0.0

0$

2,5

42

La

nd

sca

pe

Ma

inte

na

nce

, 3

mo

nth

s (

1.5

Acre

s)

1L

S$

4,5

00

.00

$4

,50

0$

59

,83

7

Eq

uip

me

nt,

Am

en

itie

s

Drin

kin

g F

ou

nta

in (

Incl va

lve

s/b

oxe

s)

1E

A$

5,0

00

.00

$5

,00

0

Re

cycle

/Tra

sh

Re

ce

pta

cle

10

EA

$1

,00

0.0

0$

10

,00

0

Inte

rpre

tive

Dis

pla

ys

1L

S$

10

,50

0.0

0$

10

,50

0

Pic

nic

Ta

ble

- 8

se

ats

AD

A1

2E

A$

2,5

00

.00

$3

0,0

00

$5

5,5

00

SU

BT

OTA

L -

OH

LO

NE

ZO

NE

$5

62

,711

Site

Pla

n

Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan Appendix A. Costs

25San

ta T

ere

sa C

ounty

Par

k H

isto

ric

Are

a Sit

e P

lan

Bel

linge

r Fo

ster

Ste

inm

etz

Pag

e 2

of 8

Esti

mate

of

Pro

bab

le C

on

str

ucti

on

Co

sts

/Sit

e w

ork

Pro

ject

Santa

Tere

sa C

ounty

Park

Est

imate

Sta

tus:

Pro

j. #:

07.0

91

Refe

rence

Dra

win

g:

Site

Pla

n

Date

: F

ebru

ary

2, 2009

By:

E

IC

heck

ed b

y:

LS

item

descri

pti

on

qu

an

tity

un

it c

ost

item

to

tal

su

bto

tal

Site

Pla

n

2. S

ET

TL

EM

EN

T Z

ON

E

Dem

oliti

on C

lear

and G

rub

3,2

00

SF

$0.2

5$800

$800

Eart

hw

ork

an

d G

rad

ing

Base

Exc

ava

tion (

Tra

ils)

83

CY

$15.0

0$1,2

45

$1,2

45

Dra

inag

e

1"

Founta

in S

upply

Lin

e370

LF

$20.0

0$7,4

00

$7,4

00

Co

nstr

ucti

on

Sta

bili

zed D

eco

mpose

d G

ranite

(4"

Depth

)2,7

00

SF

$6.0

0$16,2

00

Tre

llis

Shade S

truct

ure

s2

EA

$10,0

00.0

0$20,0

00

Rough T

imber

Foot B

ridge

1E

A$12,0

00.0

0$12,0

00

$48,2

00

Eq

uip

men

t, A

men

itie

s

Glo

be D

ispla

y F

eatu

re1

EA

$18,0

00.0

0$18,0

00

Wate

r F

eatu

re (

incl

bould

ers

, ele

ctrica

l, pum

p1

LS

$15,0

00.0

0$15,0

00

Recy

cle/T

rash

Rece

pta

cle

2E

A$1,0

00.0

0$2,0

00

Pic

nic

Table

- 8

seats

AD

A4

EA

$2,5

00.0

0$10,0

00

Inte

rpre

tive d

ispla

ys1

LS

$10,0

00.0

0$10,0

00

$55,0

00

Irri

gati

on

Quic

k C

ouple

rs1

EA

$250.0

0$250

$250

SU

BT

OTA

L -

SE

TT

LE

ME

NT

ZO

NE

$11

2,8

95

3. A

RC

HA

EO

LO

GIC

AL

LY S

EN

SIT

IVE

AR

EA

Dem

oliti

on C

lear

and G

rub

58,0

00

SF

$0.2

5$14,5

00

$14,5

00

Eart

hw

ork

an

d G

rad

ing

Ero

sion C

ontr

ol

1LS

$800.0

0$800

Rough G

radin

g436

CY

$20.0

0$8,7

30

Base

Exc

ava

tion (

Tra

il &

Seatin

g A

rea))

111

CY

$15.0

0$1,6

67

Fin

e G

radin

g20,0

00

SF

$0.2

5$5,0

00

$16,1

96

Dra

inag

e

8"

Sto

rm D

rain

400

LF

$33.5

0$13,4

00

Catc

h B

asi

n6

EA

$2,3

35.0

0$14,0

10

$27,4

10

Co

nstr

ucti

on

Sta

bili

zed D

eco

mpose

d G

ranite

(4"

Depth

)3,6

00

SF

$6.0

0$21,6

00

Recy

cled P

last

ic H

eaderb

oard

900

LF

$5.0

0$4,5

00

Underg

round U

tiliti

es

340

LF

$100.0

0$34,0

00

Post

and R

ail

Fence

580

LF

$85.0

0$49,3

00

$109,4

00

Irri

gati

on

Irrigatio

n H

eads

- B

ubble

rs20

EA

$40.0

0$800

Root W

ate

ring S

yste

m (

2/tre

e)

28

EA

$55.0

0$1,5

40

Quic

k C

ouple

rs3

EA

$250.0

0$750

Main

Lin

e -

1-1

/2"

500

LF

$5.5

0$2,7

50

Irrigatio

n S

leeve

- 4

"30

LF

$5.0

0$150

Sole

noid

valv

e -

(up to 1

1/2

")3

EA

$600.0

0$1,8

00

Ball

Valv

e1

EA

$300.0

0$300

Pull

Boxe

s2

EA

$500.0

0$1,0

00

$9,0

90


26Santa

Tere

sa C

ounty

Park

His

toric A

rea S

ite P

lan

Bel

lin

ger

Fos

ter

Ste

inm

etz

Pag

e 3

of 8

Es

tim

ate

of

Pro

ba

ble

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Co

sts

/Sit

e w

ork

Pro

ject

Sa

nta

Te

resa

Co

un

ty P

ark

Estim

ate

Sta

tus:

Pro

j. #

:0

7.0

91

Re

fere

nce

Dra

win

g:

Site

Pla

n

Da

te:

Fe

bru

ary

2,

20

09

By:

EI

Ch

ecke

d b

y:

LS

ite

m d

es

cri

pti

on

qu

an

tity

un

it c

os

tit

em

to

tal

su

bto

tal

Site

Pla

n

Pla

nti

ng

So

il P

rep

ara

tio

n3

7,0

00

SF

$0

.25

$9

,25

0

Hyd

rose

ed

- N

ative

Gra

ss M

ix2

0,0

00

SF

$0

.15

$3

,00

0

Pla

ntin

g2

,20

0S

F$

2.5

0$

5,5

00

Tre

es -

15

Ga

l1

4E

A$

35

0.0

0$

4,9

00

Mu

lch

- c

hip

pe

d b

ark

10

5C

Y$

60

.00

$6

,30

0

La

nd

sca

pe

Ma

inte

na

nce

1L

S$

4,0

00

.00

$4

,00

0$

32

,95

0

Eq

uip

me

nt,

Am

en

itie

s &

Sig

na

ge

Re

cycle

/Tra

sh

Re

ce

pta

cle

4E

A$

1,0

00

.00

$4

,00

0

Be

nch

, re

cycle

d p

lastic t

op

, ste

el fr

am

e1

EA

$1

,75

0.0

0$

1,7

50

Bic

ycle

Ra

ck

1E

A$

1,0

00

.00

$1

,00

0

Bo

llard

- R

em

ova

ble

1E

A$

1,0

00

.00

$1

,00

0

Pa

rk S

ign

ag

e1

LS

$3

,50

0.0

0$

3,5

00

Re

loca

te B

ea

r T

ree

Mo

nu

me

nt

1E

A$

2,0

00

.00

$2

,00

0$

13

,25

0

SU

BT

OTA

L -

AR

CH

AE

OL

OG

ICA

LLY

SE

NS

ITIV

E A

RE

A$

22

2,7

96

4.

CA

LIF

OR

NIO

ZO

NE

De

mo

liti

on C

lea

r a

nd

Gru

b2

8,0

00

SF

$0

.25

$7

,00

0

U-S

ha

pe

d B

arn

1L

S$

15

,00

0.0

0$

15

,00

0$

22

,00

0

Ea

rth

wo

rk a

nd

Gra

din

g

Ero

sio

n C

on

tro

l1

LS

$6

50

.00

$6

50

Ro

ug

h G

rad

ing

46

3C

Y$

20

.00

$9

,25

9

Ba

se

Exca

va

tio

n,

Co

urt

Ya

rd &

Wa

lkw

ay

55

6C

Y$

15

.00

$8

,33

3$

18

,24

3

Dra

ina

ge

4"

Sa

nita

ry S

ew

er

50

LF

$6

4.5

0$

3,2

25

1"

Do

me

stic W

ate

r L

ine

20

0L

F$

20

.00

$4

,00

0

8"

PV

C S

torm

Dra

in5

50

LF

$3

8.5

0$

21

,17

5

Ju

nctio

n B

ox (

Ca

tch

ba

sin

)3

EA

$1

,50

0.0

0$

4,5

00

$3

2,9

00

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Sta

bili

ze

d D

eco

mp

ose

d G

ran

ite

, 4

"1

7,0

00

SF

$6

.00

$1

02

,00

0

Re

cycle

d P

lastic H

ea

de

rbo

ard

30

0L

F$

5.0

0$

1,5

00

Vis

ito

r C

en

ter

3,0

00

SF

$5

00

.00

$1

,50

0,0

00

Vis

ito

r C

en

ter

Exh

ibits

1,0

00

SF

$1

50

.00

$1

50

,00

0

Tre

llis E

xte

nd

ed

fro

m V

isito

r C

en

ter

1,5

40

SF

$1

5.0

0$

23

,10

0

Exis

tin

g L

-Sh

ap

ed

Ba

rn R

en

ova

tio

n1

LS

$2

00

,00

0.0

0$

20

0,0

00

We

ll1

LS

$1

5,0

00

.00

$1

5,0

00

Ho

rse

Hitch

ing

Po

st

1L

S$

50

0.0

0$

50

0

Ho

rnito

s O

ve

n1

LS

$1

0,0

00

.00

$1

0,0

00

Arb

or

@ H

erb

Ga

rde

n1

50

SF

$1

5.0

0$

2,2

50

Arb

or

@ A

do

be

Wa

ll1

,10

0S

F$

15

.00

$1

6,5

00

Ad

ob

e w

all,

3' h

igh

27

0L

F$

15

0.0

0$

40

,50

0

Wo

od

Ga

te (

Ad

ob

e W

all)

1E

A$

1,5

00

.00

$1

,50

0

Tre

llis o

n A

do

be

Wa

ll1

90

LF

$6

0.0

0$

11,4

00

Ve

ge

tab

le p

lan

ter

bo

x,

wo

od

(4

' x 5

')4

EA

$6

00

.00

$2

,40

0

Sto

ne

ed

ge

flo

we

r g

ard

en

4

00

LF

$1

5.0

0$

6,0

00

Sto

ne

ed

ge

he

rb g

ard

en

(4

' x 4

')9

6E

A$

15

.00

$1

,44

0

Wo

od

en

sta

ke

fe

nce

18

0L

F$

80

.00

$1

4,4

00

$2

,09

8,4

90

.


27Santa

Tere

sa C

ounty

Park

His

toric A

rea S

ite P

lan

Bel

lin

ger

Fos

ter

Ste

inm

etz

Pag

e 4

of 8

Esti

mate

of

Pro

bab

le C

on

str

ucti

on

Co

sts

/Sit

e w

ork

Pro

ject

Santa

Tere

sa C

ounty

Park

Estim

ate

Sta

tus:

Pro

j. #

:07.0

91

Refe

rence D

raw

ing:

Site P

lan

Date

: F

ebru

ary

2, 2009

By:

EI

Checked b

y:

LS

item

descri

pti

on

qu

an

tity

un

it c

ost

item

to

tal

su

bto

tal

Site P

lan

Irri

gati

on

Root W

ate

ring S

yste

m (

2/tre

e)

28

EA

$55.0

0$1,5

40

Bubble

rs / P

op-u

p b

ubble

rs70

EA

$40.0

0$2,8

00

Quic

k C

ouple

rs4

EA

$250.0

0$1,0

00

Main

Lin

e -

1-1

/2"

300

LF

$5.5

0$1,6

50

Irrigation S

leeve -

4"

50

LF

$5.0

0$250

Sole

noid

valv

e -

(up to 1

1/2

")4

EA

$600.0

0$2,4

00

Ball

Valv

e1

EA

$300.0

0$300

$9,9

40

Pla

nti

ng

Soil

Pre

para

tion

2,5

00

SF

$0.2

5$625

Pla

nting

2,2

00

SF

$2.5

0$5,5

00

Tre

es -

15 G

al

14

EA

$350.0

0$4,9

00

Mulc

h -

chip

ped b

ark

14

CY

$60.0

0$840

Landscape M

ain

tenance

1LS

$1,8

00.0

0$1,8

00

$13,6

65

Eq

uip

men

t, A

men

itie

sD

rinkin

g F

ounta

in, build

ing m

ounte

d1

EA

$3,5

00.0

0$3,5

00

Sto

ne W

ate

ring T

rough

1LS

$2,0

00.0

0$2,0

00

Recycle

/Tra

sh R

ecepta

cle

10

EA

$1,0

00.0

0$10,0

00

Bench, re

cycle

d p

lastic top, ste

el fr

am

e7

EA

$1,7

50.0

0$12,2

50

Inte

rpre

tive D

ispla

ys

1LS

$10,0

00.0

0$10,0

00

Pic

nic

Table

s, w

ood (

Double

length

)3

EA

$2,0

00.0

0$6,0

00

Pic

nic

Table

- 8

seats

AD

A4

EA

$2,5

00.0

0$10,0

00

$53,7

50

SU

BT

OTA

L -

CA

LIF

OR

NIO

ZO

NE

$2,2

48,9

88

5. JA

CO

BA

BE

RN

AL

HO

US

E

Dem

oliti

on C

lear

and G

rub

6,4

00

SF

$0.2

5$1,6

00

Dem

olis

h (

E)

drivew

ay

1,2

00

SF

$6.0

0$7,2

00

$8,8

00

Co

nstr

ucti

on

Cla

ss II A

ggre

gate

Base N

ew

Drivew

ay,

4"

27

TN

$40.0

0$1,0

67

Concre

te P

avin

g N

ew

Drivew

ay,

4"

w/W

WM

100

SF

$7.5

0$750

Post and R

ail

Fence

390

LF

$85.0

0$33,1

50

House R

esto

ration (

Pla

ce h

old

er)

NIC

N

ICN

IC$34,9

67

Irri

gati

on

Modify E

xis

ting Irr

igation S

yste

m1

LS

$2,0

00.0

0$2,0

00

Irrigation H

eads -

Bubble

rs15

EA

$40.0

0$600

Quic

k C

ouple

rs1

EA

$250.0

0$250

Sole

noid

valv

e -

(up to 1

1/2

")1

EA

$600.0

0$600

$3,4

50

Pla

nti

ng

Soil

Pre

para

tion

2,0

00

SF

$0.2

5$500

Pla

nting

2,0

00

SF

$2.5

0$5,0

00

M

ulc

h -

chip

ped b

ark

40

CY

$60.0

0$2,4

00

$7,9

00

Eq

uip

men

t, A

men

itie

sIn

terp

retive D

ispla

y1

LS

$2,0

00.0

0$2,0

00

$2,0

00

SU

BT

OTA

L -

JA

CO

BA

BE

RN

AL

HO

US

E$55,1

17


28Santa

Tere

sa C

ounty

Park

His

toric A

rea S

ite P

lan

Bel

lin

ger

Fos

ter

Ste

inm

etz

Pag

e 5

of 8

Esti

mate

of

Pro

bab

le C

on

str

ucti

on

Co

sts

/Sit

e w

ork

Pro

ject

Santa

Tere

sa C

ounty

Park

Estim

ate

Sta

tus:

Pro

j. #

:07.0

91

Refe

rence D

raw

ing:

Site P

lan

Date

: F

ebru

ary

2, 2009

By:

EI

Checked b

y:

LS

item

descri

pti

on

qu

an

tity

un

it c

ost

item

to

tal

su

bto

tal

Site P

lan

6. C

UR

IE D

RIV

E

Dem

oliti

on S

aw

Cut P

avin

g670

LF

$2.5

0$1,6

75

Dem

olis

h A

C P

avin

g a

nd B

ase (

2' w

ide e

xis

ting r

oad)

1,3

40

SF

$1.0

0$1,3

40

$3,0

15

Eart

hw

ork

an

d G

rad

ing

Ero

sio

n C

ontr

ol

1LS

$1,0

00.0

0$1,0

00

Base E

xcavation &

Export

Road, 12"

deep x

15' w

ide

372

CY

$35.0

0$13,0

20

Base E

xcavation &

Export

Sid

ew

alk

120

CY

$35.0

0$4,2

00

$18,2

20

Dra

inag

e

12"

Sto

rm D

rain

700

LF

$38.5

0$26,9

50

Sto

rm D

rain

2E

A$2,3

35.0

0$4,6

70

$31,6

20

Co

nstr

ucti

on

Cla

ss II A

ggre

gate

Base R

oad, 9"

838

TN

$40.0

0$33,5

00

Cla

ss II A

ggre

gate

Base S

idew

alk

, 4"

72

TN

$40.0

0$2,8

89

AC

Pavin

g R

oad, 3"

310

TN

$120.0

0$37,2

22

6"

Concre

te c

urb

& 1

8"

gutter

660

LF

$25.0

0$16,5

00

4"

Concre

te P

avin

g S

idew

alk

, 5' w

ide

3,2

50

SF

$6.0

0$19,5

00

Concre

te c

urb

ram

ps

4E

A$1,0

00.0

0$4,0

00.0

0T

runcate

d D

om

es T

iles

60

SF

$35.0

0$2,1

00

$115,7

11

Irri

gati

on

Root W

ate

ring S

yste

m (

RW

S)

/ per

unit

20

EA

$55.0

0$1,1

00

Irrigation P

op-u

p B

ubble

rs96

EA

$40.0

0$3,8

40

Quic

k C

ouple

rs3

EA

$250.0

0$750

Main

Lin

e -

1-1

/2"

300

LF

$5.5

0$1,6

50

Irrigation S

leeve -

4"

60

LF

$5.0

0$300

Sole

noid

valv

e -

(up to 1

1/2

")6

EA

$600.0

0$3,6

00

Gate

Valv

e1

EA

$500.0

0$500

$11,7

40

Pla

nti

ng

Soil

Pre

para

tion (

Sta

ndard

)2,8

80

SF

$0.2

5$720

Pla

nting

2,8

80

SF

$2.5

0$7,2

00

Tre

es -

15 G

al

10

EA

$350.0

0$3,5

00

Mulc

h -

chip

ped b

ark

3C

Y$60.0

0$167

$11,5

87

Sig

nag

e

Sig

ns (

Park

ing, A

DA

AG

, M

isc),

sty

le c

om

patible

with inte

rpre

tive

dis

pla

ys

5E

A$500.0

0$2,5

00

$2,5

00

SU

BT

OTA

L -

CU

RIE

DR

IVE

$194,3

93

7. S

TA

GIN

G A

RE

A

Dem

oliti

on C

lear

and G

rub

41,6

80

SF

$0.2

5$10,4

20

$10,4

20

Eart

hw

ork

an

d G

rad

ing

Ero

sio

n C

ontr

ol

1LS

$1,0

00.0

0$1,0

00

Rough G

radin

g772

CY

$20.0

0$15,4

37

Fin

e G

radin

g22,1

60

SF

$0.2

5$5,5

40

Base E

xcavation

602

CY

$15.0

0$9,0

37

$31,0

14

Sto

rm D

rain

ag

e

12"

Sto

rm D

rain

385

LF

$38.5

0$14,8

23

Sto

rm D

rain

Connection in R

oad

1LS

$5,0

00.0

0$5,0

00

Catc

h B

asin

4E

A$2,3

35.0

0$9,3

40

$29,1

63


29Santa

Tere

sa C

ounty

Park

His

toric A

rea S

ite P

lan

Bel

lin

ger

Fos

ter

Ste

inm

etz

Pag

e 6

of 8

Es

tim

ate

of

Pro

ba

ble

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Co

sts

/Sit

e w

ork

Pro

ject

Sa

nta

Te

resa

Co

un

ty P

ark

Estim

ate

Sta

tus:

Pro

j. #

:0

7.0

91

Re

fere

nce

Dra

win

g:

Site

Pla

n

Da

te:

Fe

bru

ary

2,

20

09

By:

EI

Ch

ecke

d b

y:

LS

ite

m d

es

cri

pti

on

qu

an

tity

un

it c

os

tit

em

to

tal

su

bto

tal

Site

Pla

n

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Cla

ss I

I A

gg

reg

ate

Ba

se

, 8

"1

,20

1T

N$

40

.00

$4

8,0

38

Ge

ote

xtile

fa

bric @

Pa

ve

rs7

,50

0S

F$

0.1

5$

1,1

25

Pe

rvio

us I

nte

rlo

ckin

g C

on

cre

te P

ave

rs

27

,02

0S

F$

10

.00

$2

70

,20

0

Dra

in R

ock

1L

S$

10

,00

0.0

0$

10

,00

0

Pa

rkin

g S

trip

ing

1L

S$

2,5

00

.00

$2

,50

0

De

co

mp

ose

d G

ran

ite

Wa

lkw

ay,

4"

3,6

35

SF

$6

.00

$2

1,8

10

6"

Co

ncre

te C

urb

(S

td)

1,1

65

LF

$3

1.5

0$

36

,69

8

Vis

ito

r C

en

ter

Co

ncre

te E

ntr

y W

alk

& R

am

p,

4"

80

0S

F$

7.5

0$

6,0

00

.00

Cla

ss I

I A

gg

reg

ate

Ba

se

En

try W

alk

& R

am

p,

4"

18

TN

$4

0.0

0$

71

0

Tra

sh

Du

mp

ste

r E

nclo

su

re1

EA

$1

0,0

00

.00

$1

0,0

00

.00

Tru

nca

ted

Do

me

s (

tile

s)

30

SF

$3

5.0

0$

1,0

50

$4

08

,13

1

Irri

ga

tio

n

Irrig

atio

n H

ea

ds -

Sp

ray

60

EA

$7

0.0

0$

4,2

00

Ro

ot

Wa

terin

g S

yste

m (

2/t

ree

)3

4E

A$

55

.00

$1

,87

0

Qu

ick C

ou

ple

rs3

EA

$2

50

.00

$7

50

Ma

in L

ine

- 1

-1/2

"4

00

LF

$5

.50

$2

,20

0

Irrig

atio

n S

lee

ve

- 4

"6

0L

F$

5.0

0$

30

0

So

len

oid

va

lve

- (

up

to

1 1

/2")

6E

A$

60

0.0

0$

3,6

00

Ga

te V

alv

e1

EA

$5

00

.00

$5

00

Ba

ll V

alv

e2

EA

$3

00

.00

$6

00

Ba

ckflo

w P

reve

nte

r -

2"

1E

A$

2,7

50

.00

$2

,75

0

Wa

ter

Me

ter

- 2

"1

EA

$4

,00

0.0

0$

4,0

00

Co

ntr

olle

r -

Ce

ntr

al (C

al S

en

se

)1

EA

$5

,00

0.0

0$

5,0

00

Flo

w S

en

so

r /

Ma

ste

r V

alv

e1

EA

$2

,00

0.0

0$

2,0

00

Bo

oste

r P

um

p1

EA

$1

8,0

00

.00

$1

8,0

00

PO

C a

t C

ity M

ain

1L

S$

5,0

00

.00

$5

,00

0

Pu

ll B

oxe

s3

EA

$5

00

.00

$1

,50

0$

52

,27

0

Pla

nti

ng

So

il P

rep

ara

tio

n1

9,4

15

SF

$0

.25

$4

,85

4

Hyd

rose

ed

- N

ative

Gra

ss M

ix2

,74

5S

F$

0.1

5$

41

2

Pla

ntin

g1

2,8

00

SF

$2

.50

$3

2,0

00

Tre

es,

15

Ga

l1

7E

A$

18

0.0

0$

3,0

60

Mu

lch

- c

hip

pe

d b

ark

59

CY

$6

0.0

0$

3,5

56

La

nd

sca

pe

Ma

inte

na

nce

, 3

mo

nth

s (

1 A

cre

)1

LS

$3

,00

0.0

0$

3,0

00

$4

6,8

81

Eq

uip

me

nt,

Am

en

itie

s &

Sig

na

ge

Re

cycle

/Tra

sh

Re

ce

pta

cle

8E

A$

1,0

00

.00

$8

,00

0

Bic

ycle

Ra

ck

3E

A$

1,0

00

.00

$3

,00

0$

11

,00

0

Sig

na

ge

Inte

rpre

tive

Dis

pla

y1

LS

$3

,50

0.0

0$

3,5

00

Pa

rk S

ign

ag

e2

EA

$3

,50

0.0

0$

7,0

00

Sig

ns (

Pa

rkin

g, A

DA

AG

, M

isc);

sty

le c

om

pa

tib

le w

ith

in

terp

retive

d

isp

lays

5E

A$

50

0.0

0$

2,5

00

$1

3,0

00

SU

BT

OTA

L -

STA

GIN

G A

RE

A$

60

1,8

78


30Santa

Tere

sa C

ounty

Park

His

toric A

rea S

ite P

lan

Bel

lin

ger

Fos

ter

Ste

inm

etz

Pag

e 7

of 8

Esti

mate

of

Pro

bab

le C

on

str

ucti

on

Co

sts

/Sit

e w

ork

Pro

ject

Santa

Tere

sa C

ounty

Park

Estim

ate

Sta

tus:

Pro

j. #

:07.0

91

Refe

rence D

raw

ing:

Site P

lan

Date

: F

ebru

ary

2, 2009

By:

EI

Checked b

y:

LS

item

descri

pti

on

qu

an

tity

un

it c

ost

item

to

tal

su

bto

tal

Site P

lan

8. P

ED

RO

BE

RN

AL

HO

US

E &

SID

EW

AL

K E

XT

EN

SIO

N

Dem

oliti

on C

lear

and G

rub

6,5

00

SF

$0.2

5$1,6

25

Ero

sio

n C

ontr

ol

1LS

$1,0

00.0

0$1,0

00

Base E

xcavation

112

CY

$15.0

0$1,6

80

Dem

olis

h (

E)

wood s

tructu

res

1LS

$30,0

00.0

0$30,0

00

$34,3

05

Co

nstr

ucti

on

Cla

ss II A

ggre

gate

Base S

idew

alk

Exte

nsio

n, 4"

100

TN

$40.0

0$4,0

00

4"

Concre

te P

avin

g S

idew

alk

Exte

nsio

n, 5' w

ide

4,5

00

SF

$6.0

0$27,0

00

Post and R

ail

Fence

250

LF

$85.0

0$21,2

50

$52,2

50

Eq

uip

men

t, A

men

itie

s &

Sig

nag

e

Inte

rpre

tive D

ispla

y1

LS

$2,0

00.0

0$2,0

00

$2,0

00

SU

BT

OTA

L -

PE

DR

O B

ER

NA

L H

OU

SE

& S

IDE

WA

LK

EX

TE

NS

ION

$88,5

55

9. C

ON

NE

CT

ION

TO

EA

RLY

AM

ER

ICA

N R

AN

CH

SIT

E

Dem

oliti

on C

lear

and G

rub

69,0

00

SF

$0.2

5$17,2

50

$17,2

50

Eart

hw

ork

an

d G

rad

ing

Ero

sio

n C

ontr

ol

1LS

$1,0

00.0

0$1,0

00

Base E

xcavation

154

CY

$15.0

0$2,3

15

Fin

e G

radin

g63,0

00

SF

$0.2

5$15,7

50

$19,0

65

Co

nstr

ucti

on

Cla

ss II A

ggre

gate

Base (

Tra

il)222

TN

$40.0

0$8,8

89

Recycle

d P

lastic H

eaderb

oard

1,2

50

LF

$5.0

0$6,2

50

Post and R

ail

Fence

580

LF

$85.0

0$49,3

00

$64,4

39

Irri

gati

on

Root W

ate

ring S

yste

m (

2/tre

e)

20

EA

$55.0

0$1,1

00

Bubble

rs / P

op-u

p b

ubble

rs100

EA

$40.0

0$4,0

00

Quic

k C

ouple

rs4

EA

$250.0

0$1,0

00

Main

Lin

e -

1-1

/2"

400

LF

$5.5

0$2,2

00

Irrigation S

leeve -

4"

120

LF

$5.0

0$600

Sole

noid

valv

e -

(up to 1

1/2

")6

EA

$600.0

0$3,6

00

Ball

Valv

e1

EA

$300.0

0$300

Pull

Boxes

1E

A$500.0

0$500

$13,3

00

Pla

nti

ng

Soil

Pre

para

tion (

Sta

ndard

)63,0

00

SF

$0.2

5$15,7

50

Hydro

seed -

Native G

rass M

ix8,4

00

SF

$0.1

5$1,2

60

Pla

nting

12,0

00

EA

$2.5

0$30,0

00

Tre

es -

15 G

al

10

EA

$350.0

0$3,5

00

Mulc

h -

chip

ped b

ark

337

CY

$60.0

0$20,2

20

Landscape M

ain

tenance, 3 m

onth

s1

LS

$4,5

00.0

0$4,5

00

$75,2

30

Eq

uip

men

t, A

men

itie

s &

Sig

nag

e

Recycle

/Tra

sh R

ecepta

cle

2E

A$1,0

00.0

0$2,0

00

Bic

ycle

Rack

1E

A$1,0

00.0

0$1,0

00

Park

Sig

nage

1E

A$3,5

00.0

0$3,5

00

Inte

rpre

tive D

ispla

y1

LS

$15,0

00.0

0$15,0

00

$21,5

00

SU

BT

OTA

L -

CO

NN

EC

TIO

N T

O E

AR

LY

AM

ER

ICA

N R

AN

CH

SIT

E$210,7

84


31Santa

Tere

sa C

ounty

Park

His

toric A

rea S

ite P

lan

Bel

lin

ger

Fos

ter

Ste

inm

etz

Pag

e 8

of 8

Es

tim

ate

of

Pro

ba

ble

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Co

sts

/Sit

e w

ork

Pro

ject

Sa

nta

Te

resa

Co

un

ty P

ark

Estim

ate

Sta

tus:

Pro

j. #

:0

7.0

91

Re

fere

nce

Dra

win

g:

Site

Pla

n

Da

te:

Fe

bru

ary

2,

20

09

By:

EI

Ch

ecke

d b

y:

LS

ite

m d

es

cri

pti

on

qu

an

tity

un

it c

os

tit

em

to

tal

su

bto

tal

Site

Pla

n

Su

bto

tal

$4

,29

8,1

17

10

% M

ob

iliza

tio

n

$

42

9,8

12

20

% D

esig

n C

on

tin

ge

ncy

$8

59

,62

3

Su

bto

tal

$5

,58

7,5

52

10

% C

on

str

uctio

n C

on

tin

ge

ncy

$5

58

,75

5

10

% D

esig

n /

En

gin

ee

rin

g F

ee

(e

xcl G

rap

hic

De

sig

n)

$5

37

,95

5

25

% G

rap

hic

De

sig

n F

ee

$5

2,0

00

10

% C

on

str

uctio

n R

evie

w,

Ma

na

ge

me

nt,

Te

stin

g &

In

sp

ectio

n

$5

58

,75

5

To

tal

$7

,29

5,0

17

Ex

clu

sio

ns

:

Ja

co

ba

Be

rna

l H

ou

se

Re

sto

ratio

n

Pe

dro

Be

rna

l H

ou

se

Site

Im

pro

ve

me

nts

CE

QA

Re

vie

w/R

eq

uire

me

nts

Th

e a

bo

ve

ite

ms,

am

ou

nts

, q

ua

ntitie

s,

an

d r

ela

ted

in

form

atio

n a

re b

ase

d o

n B

FS

LA

's ju

dg

me

nt

at

this

le

ve

l o

f d

ocu

me

nt

pre

pa

ratio

n a

nd

is o

ffe

red

on

ly a

s r

efe

ren

ce

da

ta.

BF

SL

A h

as n

o c

on

tro

l o

ve

r co

nstr

uctio

n q

ua

ntitie

s,

co

sts

, a

nd

re

late

d f

acto

rs a

ffe

ctin

g c

osts

, a

nd

ad

vis

es t

he

clie

nt

tha

t sig

nific

an

t va

ria

tio

ns m

ay o

ccu

r

be

twe

en

th

is e

stim

ate

of

pro

ba

ble

co

nstr

uctio

n c

osts

an

d a

ctu

al co

nstr

uctio

n p

rice

s.

Appendix B. Public Meeting Minutes Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan

32VI. Appendix: Public Meeting Minutes

Community Meeting Notes and Responses Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan Community Meeting #1 • May 8th, 2008

The following comments were made by participants at the community meeting.

1. Is the wooden cross at the Bernal House considered to be of historic significance? Will it be preserved?

The cross behind the Pedro Bernal house should be preserved. County staff removed some other small artifacts that were being vandalized for return to the site at a later date.

2. There used to be a large cross on the hill behind the Bernal House. The location of this, is known by residents.

The wooden cross addressed is outside the project limit.

3. What criteria were used to determine historic preservation?

It was noted by County staff that structures were evaluated for Federal, State and local significance. The structures on site are primarily of local significance. Many structures are recommended for preservation even though they were built after the periods of significance that will be interpreted at the site. All structures of historic significance will receive signage.

Structures were evaluated as to Federal, State and local significance.

4. Access to/across the canal should be considered in the site plan as a possible long-term future condition. We should not assume that the canal will always be there in the same condition and under the same ownership. While there may not be any short-term resolution, the site plan should not preclude long-term changes in canal status.

The site plan will not preclude long-term changes in canal status and respective project report will include language to that extent.

5. Will there be a connection to the Alberston Parkway as a part of the plan?

The City of San Jose required road improvements along Curie Drive will create a sidewalk connection to the Albertson Parkway. In the future, if parkway improvements will be implemented at Manila Way, directional signage can be added to project site. The project site plan includes an entry point to the park at the intersection of Manila Drive and Manila Way.

6. Difference between “Historic Area” and Site Boundaries: Why aren’t the American Ranch and Spring areas included in the Site Plan?

It was noted by County staff that improvements to these areas have already been completed, and therefore aren’t part of the current planning effort.

A graphic depicting the “historic area” including the “site boundary” will be included in the project report.

7. Landscaping seems to be only minimally included in the Design Program.

Landscape concepts are included in the next level of site plan design.

The revised draft site plant reflects more detailed planting concepts to include restored native grass areas, restored oak woodlands, a vegetable and flower garden associated with the visitor center, as well as vegetated swales in the parking lot median and the creek bed in the Ohlone area. In addition there are areas of shrub plantings. All plantings will be historically relevant.

8. No dogs in historic area? Neighbors would like to be able to walk their dogs somewhere. Is it possible to provide access to other park trails where dogs are permitted?

Dogs are not allowed in the historic area, but are allowed in other areas of Santa Teresa County Park. The site plan will indicate “dog routes” to access the Norred Trail and other areas of Santa Teresa County Park.

Santa Teresa County Park Historic Area Site Plan Appendix B. Public Meeting Minutes

33

9. In addition to being a County regional park and historic area, this park also serves a neighborhood. People need places to walk their dogs; kids need places to ride tricycles, etc. We should be finding ways to bring people and families into parks. If we need to ban something, we should be banning wild pigs!!

Noted, see comments per #8. Bicycle access routes to areas of Santa Teresa County Park where biking is permitted will be shown on the plan.

10. Will there be a space for docents/volunteers to store coats, jackets, etc? Will there be a break room for docents?

Any volunteers working on or in the park will be allowed to use spaces created for park staff. However, there will be no designated spaces for any one user group. Any use of the proposed facilities will have to follow rules established by the Parks and Recreation Department. Volunteers must be registered in the Parks Volunteer Program.

11. Consider a historic heritage garden as part of the plan. Consider a volunteer group to maintain a heritage garden, or historically relevant plantings.

A historically relevant, ornamental garden and vegetable/herb garden are proposed as part of the project. None of the garden spaces will be operated as community gardens, however, volunteers will be welcome with approval of Parks Department and under supervision of Parks Staff. The Martial Cottle site will provide for Community Gardens which will be operated by the City of San Jose.

12. Consider coordination with the Martial Cottle site.

There is potential for some coordination with the Martial Cottle site regarding agricultural uses, i.e. orchard plantings and maintenance thereof. Orchard or other crop plantings will not be part of the Ohlone/Settlement and Californio Rancho areas. However, orchards are proposed for the Early American Ranch area and have not been implemented for lack of proper agricultural maintenance.

13. A ranch usually has animals. Will there be more animals than there are currently? A suggestion was made to work with the local 4H Club on this.

It was noted by County staff that maintaining animals is difficult and needs to be considered.

Animals are planned for the second historic barn at the Early American Ranch site. Animals will not be part of the new interpretive sites.

14. Will there be equestrian staging?

There will be no equestrian staging at the site. Equestrian staging is provided for in other areas of the park.

Will bikes be allowed on trails?

Current County policy is that bikes are not allowed in historic areas. However, bike access to the Norred Trail will be indicated on the plans.

15. Consider partnering with the Water District on interpretation of water themes.

Water District presence at the site is outside of interpreted/significant time periods and will not be interpreted as a part of the Historic Area Site Plan.

16. Does the design program take into account the number of visitors at a time?

Currently about 2,500-3,000 school children visit the already-developed Ranch area per year. It is anticipated that with an expanded park more than one visiting group could be accommodated at a given time. The design program is currently based on a staging area for approximately 40 cars and two buses.

A parking analysis is currently underway to evaluate parking availability based on projected users.


34

17. More and more, neighbors have observed that school groups come in cars instead of buses.

The proposed project design reflects anticipated user numbers: 40 car parking lot and 2 bus drop off/parking space. This is being evaluated as part of a parking analysis.

18. Neighbors observed that the parking lot at the Bernal Ranch is not always open when the park is open.

Neighbors can call the Hellyer Park office at 225-0225 if the gate is locked when the park is open.

Parking Lot at the Early American Ranch Site should be open as signed

19. Will parking be free? It should be; otherwise people will park in the neighborhood.

The County is currently discussing a parking fee policy. The future park will be governed by policy as determined. It is possible that there will be a vehicle entry fee upon full build-out of project. Fees are typically associated with the provision of certain park features, i.e. restrooms.

20. Overflow parking, if planned for the school parking lot, needs to be coordinated with the school. There are a lot of activities at the school on weekends with heavy use of the parking lot. Of greater concern is that weekend school users may use the park’s parking lot for overflow parking, leaving no place for park users to park, other than the neighborhood.

A preliminary approval of school parking lot use for special events was granted by Oak Grove School District.

21. Don’t use asphalt paving for whole access trails! Consider other surfaces that would meet whole access standards while looking more “historic”, such as stabilized decomposed granite or stabilized dirt.

Paving materials will be determined during the project’s construction document phase.

22. Railings at the Spring have visual disruption for people in wheelchairs.

Not applicable to project.

23. Does the Parks Department have a copy of the Master’s Thesis that was done on the area? This may be a good source.

County does have a copy these.

24. Consider collaborating with San Jose State, which may have historic artifacts appropriate to the site that could be returned for display.

County staff will follow-up.

25. If existing residences are used for residences, there should be a security component. In other words, having residents living there should provide additional site security at night.

If existing residences will be occupied through the Park Residence Program it is anticipated that the ability to observe the project site from the residences would provide an additional element of security

26. Since some of the structures are from the 20th century, it may be appropriate to have transitional stories as a part of the interpretation that link the Californio Rancho period to the more recent structures.

The project will provide signage that recognizes connections between historic site use and modern uses and habitation, specifically pointing out Bernal family relationships/connections.

27. Andrew Galvan, curator of Mission Dolores in Fremont, is an excellent resource for the Native American period.

Noted.


35

28. Be careful using the term “Ohlone”. “Ohlone” represents a specific village. “Costanoan” may be more appropriate. Andrew Galvan could assist with this.

County Staff prefers to use the term “Ohlone” at this time. If Native American representatives with whom County has consulted request change in terms, change will be made.

29. Bubble Diagrams: Many liked the idea of water as a unifying continuous theme (Concept 2) instead of as a “feature” that occurs in different event areas (Concept 1). The importance of water during the Native American period for example is that it was used to leach tannins from the oak acorns.

Noted.

30. Look at incorporating “green” materials and design techniques, such as use of permeable paving, innovative methods for storm water control, etc. However, such a sustainable approach should be “low-tech” to tie into historic approach, for example, no “high-tech” solar panels.

Material use will be determined during the project’s construction document phase. Some environmentally friendly storm water control measures are part of the site plan to include the vegetated swale in the parking lot and the vegetated “creek”. Material use and implementation methods will at a minimum have to meet existing ordinances and requirements at time of implementation

31. Are there any plans for widening/improvements on Manila Drive? Don’t widen Manila! Neighbors want it maintained as a “country” road. Preserve the large oak tree on Manila!

County staff noted that they will coordinate this with City roads staff. The neighborhood will be updated if the City requests widening/improvements as a part of the site plan.

Currently, proposed improvements for Manila are limited to a hammerhead turn-around at the end of Manila Drive.

32. Consider adding the canal as part of the water story – the role of the canal in more recent history.

County Staff determined that the canal shall not be interpreted because it does not pertain to the significant historic periods.

33. Others felt the interpretation should be limited to the time periods already specified (Native American, Settlement, Californio Rancho). It gets too confusing to expand, and where do you draw the line? If more current themes are going to be discussed, then global warming should be an important theme and its influence on water supply in the future.

Noted.

34. Concern about Concept 1: Trails seem too close in some areas to neighborhood property lines.

Trails shown on bubble diagram plans are only diagrammatic. Revised alignments are shown on revised draft site plan.

35. Consider visibility throughout the site for safety of park users and patrol from streets.

Security has been considered in site design. In addition language will be included

in the site plan report that speaks to safety and security issues.

36. Some of the participants preferred the location of the Visitor Center in Concept 2.

Noted.

37. Consider ways of discouraging use of parking area as an evening “hangout” with potential security problems for the neighborhood and for the park. Consider security lighting and visibility for this.

The planned parking lot is located along 2 streets and will be easily observed from the project perimeter. Proposed plantings are either below or above line of vision.


36

38. Consider acquisition of the canal by County Parks sometime in the future. Consider filling in the canal in certain focused areas. Some neighbors commented that they have seen Parks staff use the canal even though it is not authorized for use.

Site plan report shall not preclude future/long term opportunity of canal and service road.

39. Consider whether school children will use trails through the park as a short-cut to school. They may also be desirable for cross-country training, etc.

It is likely that school children will use some project trails to “short-cut” to the project adjacent middle school. A negative impact from such uses is not anticipated.

40. Consider an “archive” room for copies of artifacts, storage of oral histories, research relevant to the site, etc.

County Staff determined that a potential visitor center will not include an archiving function.

41. Consider security-level lighting, but don’t over-light to conflict with the neighborhood.

Security lighting is proposed and will be determined during the project’s construction document phase. Language will be included in the site plan report that speaks to safety and security issues.

42. “California Hunting Tales” is a good book with historic tales of the time.

Noted.

43. Will there be a Visitor Center shop to sell historic books, artifact copies, and other historically appropriate items?

Specific visitor center building uses will be determined during the project’s construction document phase.

Community Meeting Notes and ResponsesSanta Teresa County Park Historic Area Site PlanCommunity Meeting #2 • October 16, 2008

The following comments were made by participants at the community meeting.

1. Pig problem along Manila Drive after bridge was fenced off.

The bridge belongs to the water district and fencing was installed by the water district. The County is aware that there has always been a pig problem.

2. Access to Norred trail is too steep for many people.

Unfortunately, due to the existing topography the steep trail access at the American Ranch site cannot be helped. However, the nearby access from the ranger facility is much less steep and is a viable alternative. Parks Department will consider possible future connection at canal bridge, see question #29.

3. What are the security implications of mothballing a structure?

Parks has made the following security provisions for the Jacoba Bernal Fisher house which is currently mothballed. The structure has been secured, i.e. windows boarded up, house is alarmed, the Pedro Bernal house which overlooks the site is presently occupied by Parks staff member providing an on-site presence for the area, and Parks’ Operations staff regularly patrol the area and check on the house.

4. Interpretive Period: why not through 1950?

Interpretive periods for Santa Teresa Park were determined during the master planning process.


37

5. Is there a layout plan for the visitor center?

A layout plan for the visitor center will be developed during the construction document phase of the project. The size and shape of the proposed visitor center is a place holder only. However, approximate programming and associated size needs were determined by County Staff.

6. Picture of original Bernal Adobes should be included on board exhibits and in report document.

Augustine Adobe is an example.

The adobe shown on the board exhibit is typical for the interpreted time period. More stylistic, Bernal family relevant building research will be conducted during the construction document phase of the project.

The County does not have pictures of the house that burned down.

Community member (Kitty) offered to track down a photo.

No picture has been received to date.

7. No mention of mining; already interpreted at American Ranch site. Can there be a “mine” on site?

Mining did not occur within the project site and since mining has already been interpreted at the American Ranch site it will not be interpreted within the project site again.

8. Use historical features on site that are already there.

Existing historical features are being utilized to the extent possible, i.e. the Bernal houses will be addressed with interpretive plaques, site water will be drawn from Santa Teresa Spring, the Bear Tree will be interpreted, etc.

9. Use spring water on site.

The site plan proposes use of water from Santa Teresa Spring utilizing an existing pipe line.

10. Use houses as exhibits.

The Pedro Bernal House is being utilized for the Park Residence Program. For security reasons Park Ranger presence is desirable. At this time, the Jacoba Bernal House is being mothballed due to severe structural damage. Funding for any type of improvements are currently not available and potential future uses will be determined by County Staff when funding becomes available. Regardless of use, the Jacoba Bernal House and relevant family history will be addressed with an interpretive plaque.

11. When would construction happen?

There is no timeframe yet.

12. Manila Dr. fire truck turn-around is a problem.

The County discussed requirements with the City of San Jose’s transportation department and the City determined that a fire truck turn-around is not required at the end of Manila Drive. Site Plan has been revised.

13. Look at bus turn-out, too far from the parking lot.

The bus drop-off zone has been relocated to a location as close as possible to the proposed staging area/parking lot.

14. Look at location of walk connection at Manila Drive, conflict with oak tree.

The exact location of the walk connection will be determined during the Construction Document phase of the project. All amenities will be located to facilitate the connection while protecting the oak tree as much as possible.


38

15. Look at grades at fire truck turn-around.

Based on discussions with the City of San Jose’s transportation department the fire truck turn-around has been eliminated from the site plan.

16. Consider security issues overall.

During the Construction Document phase of the project security issues such as visibility, lighting, surveillance etc. will be addressed. All future park design will aim to make the park as safe as possible.

17. Consider a camp “host”.

During this early planning stage both existing Bernal residences have been discussed as to their potential security benefits when occupied. At this time, the site is not programmed for any additional structures, keeping in mind that the existing Jacoba Bernal House might require replacement and future uses could include a “host”, Park Ranger housing or exhibits (see #10 above).

Security issues have been added to Design elements list.

18. Consider visibility in overall site design.

See response to #16 above.

19. There should be a fence along Manila to new entrance.

Fence is shown on site plan.

20. Existing mid-block access at Manila Drive should be closed.

The County discussed and recommended closure of the mid-block access at Manila Drive.

21. Avoid benches at entrances.

Seating from the Manila Drive entrance has been removed from the site plan.

22. Look at MacAbee entrance as an example.


23. Historically Manila Dr. was Bernal Rd.

Noted.

24. Some people didn’t get meeting notice.

Noted, County will stive to reach all neighbors in the future.

25. When will barn at American Ranch be completed?

-Barn

The second barn will be completed as funding becomes available.

-Site not ADA compliant

County Staff will review ADA compliance issues.

26. Pedestrian access at Manila needs to be ADA compliant.

All future improvements will comply with ADA requirements.

27. Would like to see Jacoba Bernal House as “walk through” and part of history interpretation.


28. Look at meandering a walk/trail connection along San Ignacio between two existing sidewalk locations.

Existing topography and the need to make the future sidewalk ADA accessible prohibit a meandering walk. In addition the City of San Jose wants the missing sidewalk to match the already existing sidewalk components.


39

29. The desire of the community is to have connection across canal to Norred trail.

The County does not have jurisdiction over the canal crossing. The site plan has been revised to show a potential trail corridor if connection to the Norred Trail becomes possible in the future.

30. Historic Resources Commission requested a Master Plan of American Ranch, California Ranch, and Norred Ranch sites, not just a historic inventory.

Parks has a Board approved Master Plan for Santa Teresa County Park. Parks will be conducting an evaluation and inventory of all unused/historic structures within the Parks system.

31. Why are animals forbidden in historic area?

Farm animals have already been programmed for the American Ranch site. Given number of school-age and small children visiting the site, and sensitivity of historic sites in general, Parks Department policy is not to allow pets and horses in historic sites. Other trails within Sana Teresa County Park are open to dogs and horses.

32. The Site Plan is not satisfying the needs of the neighborhood.

- Better trail access.

See response to #2 and #29 above.

- Need a place to walk dogs.

Existing County ordinances prohibit dog walking in historic areas. While Santa Teresa County Park is adjacent to a neighborhood, it is not a neighborhood park, and as a historic area, cannot fulfill the functions of a traditional neighborhood park.


40