90

Click here to load reader

Sand control FINAL.ppt

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Sand Control

  • z

    r

  • Mohamed yashar Negm Eldin

  • IS

    Sand

    Control

    really

    important

    Why

    ?!!!

    z

  • z

    IS

    Sand

    Control

    really

    important

    Why

    ?!!!

  • IS

    Sand

    Control

    really

    important

    Why

    ?!!!

    Wellbore damage or pluggingSurface handlingSubsea flowline plugging

    z

  • z

    IS

    Sand

    Control

    really

    important

    Why

    ?!!!

  • z

  • Mohamed Wageih Mohamed

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

    .

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • Ali Mohamed Ali Hassan

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • Ayman Mamdouh Abd Elkader

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

    TermBHN

    Remarks

    Unconsolidated

    < 2

    No cementing

    material

    Partially

    2 - 5

    Crushed with fingers

    Friable

    5 - 10

    Crushed when

    rubbed

    Consolidate

    10 - 30

    Crushed with force

    Hard> 30

    Can not be broken

    with force

    Medium Hard

    30 - 50

    Hard

    50 - 125

    Very Hard

    > 125

  • z

  • z

  • Waleed Nagi Ebrahim

  • z

  • z

  • z

    Downhole

    Surface

    Blast Joints

    Chokes

    Gas lift Equipment

    Elbows

    Standing Valves

    Tees

    Pumps

    Valves

    Safety Valves

    Metering Devices

    Nipples

    Flanges

    Tubulars

    Wellhead

    :

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • Ahmed Mohamed Hassan

  • Contents

    1.Gravel types

    2.Gravel sizing

    3.Amount of gravel

    4.Types of gravel pack

  • The heart of a gravel pack is the sizing of the gravel to stop the formation sand. If the sand invades the pack, the 100 to 400 Darcy permeability level of the gravel pack drops to 50 to 500 md and skins of 300 are possible.

    gravel

    Formation sand

    flow

    *

  • The gravel is selected and placed to stop the formation sand.Correct size? About 6 times the diameter of the formation sand in most cases, but there are some cases where larger gravel is acceptable and more productive.

    *

  • Sand:

    roundness = 0.8

    handling produces fines

    Man made

    roundness = 0.9+

    larger average size in any range

    Higher perm than sand

    stronger, less fines.

    For narrow range gravel about double price.

    *

  • Conventional (Sauciers method)Sorting and fines as influencesOrdering special gravels

    It all begins with getting a particle size distribution from several representative samples of each different segment of the pay.

    Use mesh screens if possible. Laser equipment over estimates fines and under estimates the coarser particles.

    *

  • 95 microns is the 50% interceptSauciers method

    6 x 50% intercept gives gravel that will not allow invasion of grains into pack.

    The 6 x is an experience factor but it is also describes the maximum pore opening between a pack of similar sized grains.

    Sorting influence can use 8x in frac pack or cases where sorting is good and fines are limited.

    *

  • Factors:

    Length of perforated or open hole intervalAnnular dimensionsVolume of perfsTarget for gravel outside the perfs

    *

  • *

  • Advantages

    known/trusted method

    moderate reliability

    Disadvantages

    higher cost

    subject to erosion

    low reliability

    moderately easily plugged

    *

  • Proppant ( Gravel ) is precoated with resin material.Particles are mixed with viscous gel and squeezed into the formation.A resin coated gravel plug is left in the wellboreParticles are contacted grain-to-grain.

    Advantages

    Low Cost, onshore.

    Resin

    Gravel

    Formation

    (Unconsolidated)

    *

    NOTES:

    Only 5% of all Sand Control Treatments. Low Cost mainly done onshore

    In-situ or plastic consolidation: Involves the use of resins as bonding material to cement the grains of formation sand several feet around the wellbore, so that formation fluids can be produced sand-free.

    To be effective the resin must:

    Wet the sand surfaces and adhere to the sand grains.

    Yield a high compressive strength upon curing.

    Not induce a high reduction of the permeability of the formation around the wellbore.

    In most cases a stimulation treatment (Mud Acid and/or Clay Acid) is performed prior to the consolidation treatment.

  • GP sand is (by design) 5-6 times larger than formation sand. GPing does not alter screen behavior. GPing will arrest annular flow GP screen must allow production of fines, otherwise completion will plug. Pore throat of most GP sands will restrict production of fines. GPing will arrest/trap formation filter cake on the formation surface.GPing will not allow formation to relax/de-stress.

    Particle size

    of produced

    fines: 7 u

    Particle size

    of produced

    fines: 30-60 u

    Particle size

    of produced

    fines: 80-100 u

    Screen

    Formation

    GP sand

    2

    *

  • Reverse-circulation:

    Gravel laden fluid -annulus-screens-flow back up the tubing

    Disadvantages:

    Poss. of rustdebris from annuls mixed gravelDamage pack perm

    Crossover:

    Gravel laden fluid tubing screen open hole annulus-leave gravel annulus - flow back up the annulus

    Note:

    All OH are underreamed through the productive interval to insure well productivity

    *

  • High rate water packing is a method of sand control where fracturing the formation is employed to place gravel outside of the casing and perforations beyond the damage radius of the well

    Advantages:

    pressured packing of perfs

    easier design/apply than frac pack

    Good flow in mod. kh formations

    Disadvantages:

    lower flow capacity than frac

    limited zone/water control

    Unequal packing of gravel per foot

    Injection rate rule of thumb: 1 bpm/10 ft of perfs

    *

  • Ahmad Hassan Mansour

  • z

    Frac & Pack.ESS (Expandable sand screen). SMP (Shape memory polymers).Nanoparticle technology.ICD (Inflow Control Device).
  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • Basma Maged Elbanna

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • z

  • Omar Hussein Elshamy

  • High well productivity losses typically 60% - are observed after well killing followed by gravel packing operations see the next figure.The next figure summarizes the result of a field test in which the wells productivity index was measured at various stages in the completion process. The final well productivity, despite a 6-month clean up period, was only 18% of that achieved prior to gravel packing.
  • There is a varying efficiency for the different types of sand control that can be installed. Typical well productivity and the implications for the various sand control options for a West African field study are: