Upload
thuy
View
51
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Sampling for Surveys in the Dutch Statistical Bureau. Ida H. Stamhuis One of the chapters of the book The Statistical Mind in the Netherlands 1850-1940 (to be published in 2008) (co-authors Jelke van Bethlehem, Jacques van Maarseveen) For ‘the’ story I refer to that chapter - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Sampling for Surveys in the Dutch Statistical Bureau
Ida H. Stamhuis
One of the chapters of the book The Statistical Mind in the Netherlands 1850-1940 (to be published in 2008)(co-authors Jelke van Bethlehem, Jacques van Maarseveen)For ‘the’ story I refer to that chapter
Now I will suggest a more analytical approach
Woudschoten, 28 and 29 September 2007
Continuation of my Woudschoten paper of 2005 Segmentation of various forms of statistics
Segmentation between ‘secret’ statistical practice of the public administration and statistical theory Socio-economic-political explanations (didn’t go into
that)
Segmentation within theoretical statistics Two different forms of knowledge
Carried out by people with different ways of thinking Carried out by people belonging to different intellectual
cultures No real communication between them
Lobatto’ statistics: ‘quantitative-probabilistic’
Vissering’s statistics representative of that of the ‘Statistical Movement’: qualitative-quantitative
Statistics as systematic description of all aspects of state / society
Statistics new discipline at the faculties of law
From the viewpoint of circulation of knowledge Conclusion: segmentation; no circulation (for the time being)
It asks for an explanation. In 2005 I concluded with the question:
What kind of expertise is necessary? Result was discouraging
Another approach: Let us try out a theoretical social scientific notion and look at a related case in which the border has ultimately passed: ‘habitus’ of Bourdieu
Social experiences and circumstances result in ‘mental structure’ through which the world is experienced: habitus
Consequence: not easily changed by intellectual arguments, but rather by change of experiences and circumstances
Survey: observational study of social or economic factors of populations, emerged from the ‘Vissering’ statistical world
A sample is “a part for the whole”; a sample must be ‘representative’
19th century ‘monograph studies’ considered ‘representative’
‘typical entities’ No exceptional cases The whole is more than the sum of the parts
Kiaer: purposive samples representative In purposive sampling: variation also taken into
account
Around 1900 discusssion about the choice between complete enumeration and purposive sampling in the international statistical community: Von Mayr: “One cannot replace by calculation the
real observation of facts”
In England development of mathematically oriented (bio)statistics including random sampling; Pearson and Fisher In random sampling expertise of the statistician is
replaced by ‘blind’ chance 1906 Bowley proposed random sampling in the English
statistical community
1924 Commission in the International Statistical Community: report
Random and purposive selection both reason to exist Describe meticulously the sampling procedure in each
investigation
‘run with the hare and hunt with the hounds’
Prominent Dutch Statisticians involved: Verrijn Stuart: “I state that in principle no representative
method, one or another, can have the significance of a complete enumeration of the phenomenon of study”
Otherwise random selection because of the ‘Law of Large Numbers’
Methorst: purposive sample “helps to save a great deal of expense and labor”
Surveys mainly executed by official statisticians: educated in law, directors of the CBS (Verrijn Stuart, Methorst,
Idenburg), Van Zanten (director Amsterdam SB)
Dutch Statistical textbooks 1910 Verrijn Stuart:
Monograph method Purposive selection
1927 Van Zanten: Law of Large Numbers Purposive selection Random selection
No preference between the two methods
Dutch Statistical textbooks
From the 1930’s people with more exact background invaded the Dutch statistical community: Accountants Bakker and Stridiron authors of textbooks, Tinbergen, Holwerda (actuary)
Bakker 1934: random sampling, probability theory in words. 1939-2: In Foreword thanks to Methorst as well as Tinbergen and
Holwerda 1941-3: distinguishes between quality control and surveys
In distinct section Derksen introduces mathematical formula Section about opinion polls
Dutch Statistical textbooks
Tinbergen 1936 Grondproblemen der Theoretische Statistiek (Basic Problems of Theoretical Statistics) Random samples obvious
Accountant Stridiron 1941 Handboek der Bedrijfseconomische Statistiek (Handbook of Statistics of Business Economics): Mathematical parts written by Tinbergen Random samples obvious 1943-2 Derksen Co-author chapter ‘Samples”: Survey
as well as Quality Control
Practice in CBS Methorst tested in 1924 ‘representative method’ ,
partly purposive, partly random: it did not work
Then surveys for economic indicator’s like consumer price index; national expenditure surveys necessary: recruitment of households through labor unions and advertisements
Etc. Samples often purposive, sometimes mixed with random
Sampling in Market Research
Various organizations Unilever established Lintas (1934) and IHO (1938) NSS (1940) NIPO (1945)
Sampling obvious: CBS director Idenburg felt in 1948 the need to explain why CBS chose for complete census
Sampling method not always clear Problem of Non-response more attention than sampling
method
Conclusions Conceptual hurdles to go from completeness to samples:
information is lost
Conceptual hurdles to go from purposive to random sampling: opinion of expert not relevant; mathematical principles not clear to the powerful statisticians in the first half of the twentieth century
Conclusions
Other hurdles: (“Socio-economic-political”) Automation makes completeness cheap Administration doesn’t like to fire officials Complete material available Organization structures are not easily
changed
Why ultimately randomness accepted?
Not because statisticians start to understand the mathematical background
Rather because they become convinced of its relevance Intermediaries (belong to both communities) play an
important role Other hurdles disappear
Habitus of Bourdieu?