Sample LDOE Spring 2015 Student Test Report for ELA

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/23/2019 Sample LDOE Spring 2015 Student Test Report for ELA

    1/2

    Spring 2015 Student Report

    ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

    JOHN DOE GRADE 4000000 MAGNOLIA ELEMENTARY PELICAN PARISH

    OVERVIEW

    he English Language Arts/Literacy (ELA/L) Assessment measures whether students are on track to be successful in ELA coursework

    he next grade level. This report gives your students overall score and performance level compared to other students in the same g

    or more information about the test, interpreting results, and instructional resources, click here.

    OVERALL STUDENT PERFORMANCE OVERALL DISTRICTPERFORMANCE

    OVERALL STAT

    PERFORMANCE

    SCORE

    714

    John scored 714on a scale of 650 to 850, and performed at

    Approaching Basic.

    Students performing at this level will need strong support to

    be prepared for further studies in this content area.

    WHEN COMPARED TO OTHER STUDENT PERFORMANCE ACROSS THE DISTRICT AND STATE

    READING PERFORMANCE (10 TO90) WRITING PERFORMANCE (10 TO60)

    STUDENTSCORE

    25

    LEVEL 4SCORE

    50

    SCHOOLAVERAGE

    52

    DISTRICTAVERAGE

    51

    STATEAVERAGE

    49

    STUDENTSCORE

    19

    LEVEL 4SCORE

    35

    SCHOOLAVERAGE

    38

    DISTRICTAVERAGE

    36

    STATAVERA

    34

    LITERARY TEXT WRITTEN EXPRESSION

    STUDENT

    PERFORMANCE In this area, you are able to read and analyze

    grade-appropriate fiction, drama and poetry very

    well and are prepared for the next level of studies.

    STUDENT

    PERFORMANCEYou can compose well-developed, organized, an

    clear writing, using details from what you have

    read, but will still benefit from additional suppo

    to be fully prepared for next level of studies.

    INFORMATIONAL TEXT KNOWLEDGE & USE OF LANGUAGE CONVENTION

    STUDENT

    PERFORMANCEYou can read and analyze grade-appropriate non-

    fiction, including texts about history, science, art, and

    music. You will still benefit from additional support to

    be fully prepared for next level of studies

    STUDENT

    PERFORMANCEYou can compose writing using the rules of

    standard English (including those for grammar,

    spelling, and usage) and are prepared for the n

    level of studies

    VOCABULARY

    STUDENT

    PERFORMANCE You will need strong support in using context to

    determine what words and phrases mean in grade-

    appropriate texts.

    PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN EACH PERFORMANCE LEVEL SUBGROUP RATIN

    SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE NATIONAL

    10% 15% 16% 20%ADVANCED

    (801-850)Exceeded expectations

    Prepared or well prepared

    next level of studies

    Will benefit from addition

    support to be fully prepar

    for next level of studies

    Will need strong support f

    the next level of studies

    20% 23% 24% 25%MASTERY

    (750-800)Met expectations

    40% 30% 35% 35%BASIC

    (725-749)Approached expectations

    20% 25% 15% 14%APPROACHING BASIC

    (700-724)Partially met expectations

    10% 7% 10% 6%UNSATISFACTORY

    (660-699)Did not meet expectations

  • 7/23/2019 Sample LDOE Spring 2015 Student Test Report for ELA

    2/2

    Spring 2015 Student Report

    ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

    JOHN DOE GRADE 4000000 MAGNOLIA ELEMENTARY PELICAN PARISH

    OVERVIEW

    he English Language Arts/Literacy (ELA/L) Assessment measures whether students are on track to be successful in ELA coursework

    he next grade level. This report gives your students overall score and performance level compared to other students in the same g

    or more information about the test, interpreting results, and instructional resources, click here.

    OVERALL STUDENT PERFORMANCE YOUR SCHOOL AVERAGE

    740YOUR DISTRICT AVERA

    756SCORE

    714

    John scored 714on a scale of 650 to 850, and

    performed at Approaching Basic.

    Students performing at this level will need strong

    support to be prepared for further studies in this

    content area.

    STATE AVERAGE

    734PARCC AVERAGE

    729

    WHEN COMPARED TO OTHER STUDENT PERFORMANCE ACROSS THE DISTRICT AND STATE

    READING PERFORMANCE (10 TO90) WRITING PERFORMANCE (10 TO60)

    STUDENT

    SCORE

    25

    LEVEL 4

    SCORE

    50

    SCHOOL

    AVERAGE

    52

    DISTRICT

    AVERAGE

    51

    STATE

    AVERAGE

    49

    STUDENT

    SCORE

    19

    LEVEL 4

    SCORE

    35

    SCHOOL

    AVERAGE

    38

    DISTRICT

    AVERAGE

    36

    STAT

    AVERA

    34

    LITERARY TEXT WRITTEN EXPRESSION

    STUDENT

    PERFORMANCE

    STATE PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN EACH PERFORMANCE LEVELSTUDENT

    PERFORMANCE

    STATE PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN EACH PERFORMANCE

    STRONG

    30%

    AVERAGE

    50%

    STRUGGLING

    20%

    STRONG

    20%

    AVERAGE

    35%

    STRUGG

    45%

    INFORMATIONAL TEXT KNOWLEDGE & USE OF LANGUAGE CONVENTION

    STUDENTPERFORMANCE

    STATE PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN EACH PERFORMANCE LEVEL

    STUDENTPERFORMANCE

    STATE PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN EACH PERFORMANCE

    STRONG

    15%

    AVERAGE

    55%

    STRUGGLING

    30%

    STRONG

    35%

    AVERAGE

    55%

    STRUGG

    10%

    VOCABULARY

    STUDENT

    PERFORMANCE

    STATE PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN EACH PERFORMANCE LEVEL

    STRONG

    5%

    AVERAGE

    45%

    STRUGGLING

    50%

    PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN EACH PERFORMANCE LEVEL SUBGROUP RATINSCHOOL DISTRICT STATE NATIONAL

    10% 15% 16% 20%ADVANCED

    (801-850)Exceeded expectations

    Prepared or well prepared

    next level of studies

    Will benefit from addition

    support to be fully prepar

    for next level of studies

    Will need strong support fthe next level of studies

    20% 23% 24% 25%MASTERY

    (750-800)Met expectations

    40% 30% 35% 35%BASIC

    (725-749)Approached expectations

    20% 25% 15% 14%APPROACHING BASIC

    (700-724)Partially met expectations

    10% 7% 10% 6%

    UNSATISFACTORY

    (660-699) Did not meet expectations