Sample Analysis - Raman Spectroscopy of Leaf Section

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Sample Analysis - Raman Spectroscopy of Leaf Section

    1/4

    TelFaxEmail

    +44 (0) 1453 523800+44 (0) 1453 [email protected]

    Renishaw plcSpectroscopy Products DivisionOld Town, Wotton-under-Edge,Gloucestershire GL12 7DWUnited Kingdom www.renishaw.com

    Raman spectroscopy of leaf section

    Overview

    Raman spectra were acquired from a polished section of a leaf. The sample was strongly fluorescent when

    imaged with visible excitation but good Raman spectra were collected with near-IR excitation.

    Raman images were created based on data collected using Renishaws high speed StreamLine technique

    with spectra acquired with 0.7 micrometer step sizes.

    Experimental conditions

    Model Renishaws inVia Refle Raman microscope

    Excitation 532 nm and 785 nm diode lasers

    Objective Leica 100x (0.90 NA) and Leica 100x (1.3 NA) objectives

    Scan type Renishaws continuous extended SynchroScan

    Renishaws StreamLine high speed Raman imaging

    Scan range 100 cm-1

    to 3200 cm-1

    for extended scanning

    500 cm-1

    to 1600 cm-1

    for StreamLine

    Analysis and results

    The original sample sent for analysis by Raman spectroscopy was found to be extraordinarily fluorescent

    when excited by the laser. This is probably attributable to pigments within the leaf. A second sample was

    more amenable to analysis; although very fluorescent with visible excitation (532 nm) there was good

    Raman signal (on a fluorescent background) when 785 nm excitation was used. The background was found

    to quench slightly with 785 nm excitation but after 5 minutes quenching with 532 nm there was still strong

    fluorescence background with weak Raman bands observable. Raman images were created using 785 nm

    excitation with the sample immersed in de-ionised water. Figures 2 to 5 show 40 x 40 micrometer Raman

    images created from the data collected during StreamLine measurements. 3,363 spectra were acquired with

    step sizes of 0.7 micrometer. Figures 2 and 3 show the distribution of the cellulose using bands described by

    Gierlinger and Schwanniger (2007) at 380 cm-1

    and 1097 cm-1

    . The latter of these bands forms part of the

    composite of overlapping bands in the region 1070 cm-1

    to 1190 cm-1

    that includes components of both

    cellulose and lignin. Figure 4 shows an image where the centres of the cells are highlighted. The band

    around 644 cm-1

    was used to image the cell centres, although its origin is unknown. Figure 5 shows an

    image of the cell corners and cell walls, imaged using the band at 1175 cm-1

    which is attributable to lignin.

    Figure 6 shows a spectrum from the StreamLine measurement. The data were pre-processed to removecosmic ray events and then noise filtered using Renishaws Chemometric package for WiRE 3. Bands used

    to create the images in Figures 3, 4 and 5 are highlighted. The strongly fluorescent character of the sample

    is indicated by the sloping baseline.

  • 8/13/2019 Sample Analysis - Raman Spectroscopy of Leaf Section

    2/4

    Raman spectroscopy of leaf section

    2

    Figure 1. 532 nm and 785 nm Raman spectra from leaf sample. Raw data, offset for clarity.

    Figure 2. Cellulose distribution, 380 cm-1 Figure 3. Cellulose distribution, 1097 cm

    -1

    785 nm

    532 nmafter 300 s

    quench

  • 8/13/2019 Sample Analysis - Raman Spectroscopy of Leaf Section

    3/4

    Raman spectroscopy of leaf section

    3

    Figure 4. Cell centres, 644 cm-1. Figure 5. Cell corners and cell walls, 1175 cm

    -1.

    Figure 6. Typical spectrum from StreamLine mapping measurement. 785 nm excitation.

    Conclusion

    With fully automated control, it takes less than one minute to switch between excitation wavelengths and fully

    optimised spectrometer configurations. With no need to manually handle optics when working in the visible

    to NIR range, both confidence in the performance and productivity in sample running are increased. Where a

    wide range of samples are routinely analysed it becomes very fast and easy to test the sample using an

    alternative excitation.

    The leaf samples presented were found to be highly fluorescent under visible excitation and only one ofthese gave adequate Raman signal to be imaged. High resolution Raman imaging has been used to image

    different parts of the structure with high quality (signal:noise) with fast collection times.

    1175cm-1

    644cm-1

    1097cm-1

  • 8/13/2019 Sample Analysis - Raman Spectroscopy of Leaf Section

    4/4

    Raman spectroscopy of leaf section

    4

    References

    Gierlinger, N. & Schwanniger, M. (2007) The potential of Raman microscopy and Raman imaging in plant

    research. Spectroscopy21, 69-89.