Changes in The Size and Output of State Support to Russian Agriculture in 2015

(The Case of The Ural and Siberian Federal Districts)

Alexei Kopchenov, South Urals State Agricultural University,

Chelyabinsk, Russia

Samarkand Conference“Regional and International Cooperation in Central Asia and South

Caucasus: Recent Developments in Agricultural Trade”2-4 November 2016

Samarkand, Uzbekistan

1

Federal Districts of Russian Federation

Source: http://www.pvsfms.ru/?q=node/272

The Ural and Siberian Federal Districts

UFD SFD

Population, % of RF (average,

2015) 8,4% 13,2%

Arable land, % of RF (2015) 7,4% 25,7%

Agriculture production, 000 rub.

(per hectare, 2015)

19,5 11,0

Agriculture production, 000 rub.

(per capita, 2015)

26,0 32,4

Foreign trade turnover, % of RF

(01-03. 2016)

6,6% 6,9%

3

Groups of regionsCluster 1 Cluster 2

SiberianFederal district

Republic of Altay, Republic of Buryatia, Republic of Tyva, Republic of Khakasia, Zabaikalsk territory and Tomsk oblast

Altay and Krasnoyarsk territories, Irkutsk, Kemerovo, Novosibirsk and Omsk oblasts

Ural Federal district

Kurgan oblast, Khanty-Mansiysk and Yamalo-Nenets autonomous okrugs

Sverdlovsk, Tyumen and Chelyabinsk oblasts

4

Farm output by federal districts, Bil. Rub.

5

0.0

100.0

200.0

300.0

400.0

500.0

600.0

700.0

2014 2015 2014 2015

cluster 2

cluster 1

SFD UFD

Farm output indices, 2015/2014

6

1.081.101.121.141.161.181.201.221.241.261.28

SFD UFD

cluster 1

cluster 2

Output indices, 2015/2014

7

1.05

1.10

1.15

1.20

1.25

1.30

per capita per hectare per capita per hectare

cluster 1

cluster 2

SFD UFD

Distribution of funds by sources, Siberian federal district, 2014

8

60%40%

SFD, cluster 1

FederalRegional

65%35%

SFD, cluster 2

Distribution of funds by sources, Urals federal district, 2014

9

37%63%

UFD, cluster 1

Federal

Regional

52%48%

UFD, cluster 2

State support index in 2015, Siberian federal district, 2014=1,0

10

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

Total Federal Regional

cluster 1

cluster 2

State support index in 2016, Siberian federal district, 2015=1,0

11

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

Total Federal Regional

cluster 1

cluster 2

State support index in 2015, Urals federal district, 2014=1,0

12

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

Total Federal Regional

cluster 1

cluster 2

State support index in 2016, Urals federal district, 2015=1,0

13

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

Total Federal Regional

cluster 1

cluster 2

Changes in federal budget share in total state support

14

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

2014 2015 2016

SFD

UFD

Structure of support by programs

SFD UFD

2015

2016

15

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Programs

1 Insurance

2 Interest rates

3 Livestock production

4 Crop production

5 Unbound support in crop production (decoupled payments)

6 Small farms

7 Economically significant regional programs

8 Technical and technological modernization, innovative development

9 Rural territories

10 Land improvement16

The excess values of cluster 2 compared to cluster 1 in the Federal

districtsSFD UFD

2014 2015 2014 2015

Farm product value

per capita

2,123 2,208 1,493 1,572

Farm product value

per 1 ha

2,794 2,897 2,323 2,465

17

Percentage of Government payments in farm product value

18

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

cluster 1 cluster 2 cluster 1 cluster 2

SFD UFD

2014

2015

Thank You!

19