36

Appendix A - Salmon River Falls Unique Area Maps

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

Appendix B SALMON RIVER CORRIDOR1995 CITIZEN SURVEY RESULTS

Salmon River Greenway Committee - July 1996

Survey to Help Communities Shape Future

In 1992, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation proposed a plan for the future of the Salmon River corridorin Oswego County, from the Redfield Reservoir downstream to Pulaski. The plan was based on NiagaraMohawk’s need to divest itself of many of its properties not directly relevant to electric power generation.

In the year following release of Niagara Mohawk’s proposal, communities of the river corridor decided toassess what landowners in the river corridor thought about the future. The Cooperative Tug Hill Council(the council of governments representing the 14 towns that comprise the core of the Tug Hill region, sourceof the waters that flow into the Salmon River) secured a grant to carry out the survey in cooperation withthe other members of the Salmon River Greenway Committee.

In the spring of 1995, the survey was mailed to over 4,800 landowners in the river corridor through a jointeffort of the Salmon River Greenway Committee, whose members provided manpower and financing forthe survey.

Some 1,170 surveys were completed and returned. Survey results show strong support for maintaining thecharacter and environmental quality of the river corridor.

This project is funded in part by the Rural New York Environmental Action Fund administered by the Open Space Institutewith the support of the J. M. Kaplan Fund, through a grant to the cooperative Tug Hill Council.

“What Citizens Say” - A SummaryOf about 600 respondents who told us where they lived, about 35% came from residents andlandowners in Pulaski and Richland; 15% from “upstream” communities of Orwell and Redfield; and50% from river corridor landowners who live elsewhere in northern and central New York, orelsewhere in the country. Here are responses to each of the first six questions, listed in order ofimportance according to survey respondents:A. Reasons for choosing to live or to own property in a Salmon River corridor community: natural

resources of the area; rural atmosphere; low crime rate.B. Types of development you think should be encouraged in your Salmon River community: single

family houses; skiing; hiking and biking trails; fishing access trails.C. Types of development you think should be discouraged in your Salmon River community:

mobile home parks; apartments and multifamily dwellings; mobile homes on lots.D. Actions you want to see your Salmon River community use to manage future growth:

encouraging developers to locate structures in ways that preserve open space; control thelocation and type of development through zoning; control the location and types of mobilehomes.

E. Recreation and tourism-related facilities you think important to develop along the Salmon Riverand Reservoir: hiking, skiing, fishing access trail from Pulaski to Redfield; Salmon River Fallsoverlook recreation area; improved educational and tourist services at the Altmar Fish Hatchery.

F. Corridor characteristics you feel are important: clean streams, pure groundwater and wells;wildlife habitat.

48

1. What are your reasons for choosing to live or own property in a Salmon River Corridorcommunity?

VeryImportant Important

NotImportant

NoAnswer

Rural Atmosphere 853 277 35 9

Friendly and Concerned Neighbors 513 535 109 17

Quality of Schools 341 405 377 51

Family and Friends 469 377 298 30

Employed in the Area 252 201 624 97

Own Business in the Area 152 118 791 113

Agriculture or Forest Production 264 360 472 71

Low Cost of Land/Housing 384 470 250 70

Recreational Resources 557 388 175 54

Low Crime Rate 775 318 47 34

Open Space, Parks 677 354 88 55

Natural Resources (Woods, Wetlands, Streams,Wildlife, etc.)

887 230 30 25

2. What types of development do you think should be encouraged or discouraged in yourSalmon River community?

Str.Enc. Enc.

NoOpinion Disc

.

Str.Disc

.

NoAnswer

Single Family Houses 564 402 118 24 40 26

Mobile Homes on Lots 67 196 243 299 341 28

Mobile Home Parks 50 138 167 302 488 29

Vacation Homes 282 549 173 72 73 25

Apartments/Multi-Family Dwellings 67 200 241 282 355 29

Restaurants 198 539 189 112 110 26

Retail Stores/Shopping Center 199 416 172 186 182 19

Light Industry, e.g., Warehousing 204 443 194 144 160 29

Heavy Industry/Manufacturing 171 234 173 251 305 40

Tourism Service Businesses 243 463 170 135 130 33

49

Natural Resource-Based Industries 282 470 215 84 91 32

Home-Based Cottage Industries 205 452 321 92 76 28

Entertainment/Amusement 174 426 246 186 120 22

Snowmobile Trails 330 470 175 102 83 14

Skiing/Hiking/Biking Trails 455 543 85 41 34 16

Fishing Access Trails 413 510 114 71 49 17

Boat Launching Facilities 340 486 171 84 60 33

Campgrounds 275 488 169 142 83 17

Community Parks 334 545 148 70 64 13

Areas for Hunting 340 437 182 103 95 17

Nature Interpretation Areas 373 472 185 53 48 43

3. Would you want to see your Salmon River community use any of the following (landregulation and ownership techniques) actions to manage future growth?

Yes No NoOpinion

NoAnswer

Encourage development in existing villages and hamlets 800 210 129 26

Control the division of large parcels of land 689 317 131 28

Encourage developers to locate structures in ways thatpreserve open space

998 94 60 13

Control location and type of development...(zoning) 936 171 67 0

Control location and types of mobile homes 934 144 63 33

Control the location and size of signs 896 131 113 34

Require new development to conform to design standards(parking, building design, etc.)

821 193 128 34

Purchase environmentally sensitive lands from willing buyers 774 249 148 3

Purchase...(conservation easements) 664 314 143 53

Provide preferential tax assessments to owners ofenvironmentally sensitive lands

668 341 151 14

4. Development of several recreation or tourism-related facilities have been proposed onpublic and private lands along the Salmon River and Reservoir. Rate how important youthink it is to develop each of these facilities.

50

VeryImportant Important

NotImportant

NoOpinion

NoAnswer

Reconstruction of Pine Grove BoatLaunch in Selkirk Shores State Park

275 452 235 195 16

Salmon River Falls OverlookRecreation Area

316 514 230 103 11

Sportfishing Hall of Fame in Pulaski 138 276 551 175 34

Snowmobile Trails 264 481 306 99 24

Hiking/Skiing and Fishing Access Trailfrom Pulaski to Redfield Along River

405 500 187 59 23

Trail/Environmental Education Center 325 453 280 117 0

Improved Educational/Tourist Servicesat Altmar Fish Hatchery

286 512 250 109 7

Recreation/Vacation HomeDevelopments

164 382 490 117 21

Convention Center/Golf Course 122 223 633 172 24

5. How important to you are each of the following?

VeryImportant Important

NotImportant

NoOpinion

NoAnswer

Productive Farmland 605 417 90 42 20

Clean Streams 1015 162 5 2 0

Pure Groundwater and Wells 1060 119 0 2 0

Wildlife Habitat 876 263 27 15 0

Open Space 779 328 37 25 5

Rural Character 762 341 37 25 9

Large Blocks of Forested Lands 750 317 72 36 0

Wetlands and Floodplains 631 374 117 48 4

Increase in Tourism 182 367 520 69 36

Increase in Residential Development 176 370 540 74 14

Increase in Commercial Development 163 332 579 87 13

6. Town or Village You Own Land In:

51

Albion 138 Pulaski, Albion and Altmar 1

Albion and Altmar 5 Redfield 224

Albion and Orwell 3 Richland 318

Albion, Orwell and Redfield 1 Richland and Albion 6

Altmar 40 Richland and Altmar 1

Altmar and Orwell 40 Richland and Orwell 3

Orwell 229 Richland and Pulaski 30

Orwell and Redfield 5 Richland and Redfield 4

Orwell and Williamstown 1 Richland, Albion and Altmar 1

Pulaski 156 Richland, Pulaski and Albion 2

Pulaski and Albion 1 Richland, Pulaski and Redfield 1

Pulaski and Altmar 1 Richland, Pulaski, Albion, Altmar 1

Pulaski and Orwell 1 Other Answers 13

Pulaski and Redfield 3

7. Community of Residence:

Respondents wrote in 404 discrete communities. The following were listed by seven or morerespondents:

Albion, NY 61 Parish, NY 10

Altmar, NY 42 Pineville, NY 7

Baldwinsville, NY 7 Port Ontario, NY 19

Fernwood, NY 11 Pulaski, NY 201

Fulton, NY 7 Redfield, NY 84

Liverpool, NY 8 Richland, NY 174

Mexico, NY 15 Rochester, NY 11

North Syracuse, NY 7 Sandy Creek, NY 13

Orwell, NY 102 Syracuse, NY 14

Oswego, NY 10

8. Sex: 9. Age: 10. Employment Status:Male 702 18-30 41 Employed 567Female 368 31-40 182 Self-Employed 158

52

Couple 82 41-50 296 Full-time Homemaker 4051-60 289 Not Currently Employed 2961-70 224 Retired 37171+ 152

Name and Address:Respondents were asked to give their name and address if they wished to receive a summary of resultsfrom the survey. This information, semi-confidential in nature, would not of course provideworthwhile data in general, but summaries of city and state responses provide an interesting and usefulcross-check to the responses to Question 7.

By state, then, the breakdown is as follows:

New York 582 Connecticut 18 Pennsylvania 15Florida 10 California 7

There were two responses each from Maryland, North Carolina, New Hampshire and Vermont, andone each from Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina,Texas, Virginia, Washington and West Virginia.

Communities from which at least seven responses were received:

Altmar 34 Liverpool 13 Oswego 19 Richland 33

Baldwinsville 7 Mexico 11 Parish 10 Rochester 10

Fulton 10 No. Syracuse 9 Pulaski 170 Syracuse 38

Lacona 7 Orwell 12 Redfield 33 Williamstown 9

Much of the discrepancy between this and Question 7 is attributable to the difference between postoffice delivery address and residence community. For example, much of the Town of Richland iscovered by rural routes from the Pulaski post office, while Orwell has a box-only post office and isalso serviced by the Richland and Lacona post offices.

The Members of the Salmon River Greenway Committee

Town of Albion Cornell Cooperative Extension of Oswego CountyTown of Orwell New York State Department of Environmental ConservationTown of Richland New York Sea GrantTown of Redfield New York State Tug Hill CommissionVillage of Altmar Niagara Mohawk Power CorporationVillage of Pulaski Oswego County Dept. of Planning & Community DevelopmentCooperative Tug Hill Council Oswego County Department of Promotion & Tourism

53

Appendix C - Natural HeritageProgram Ranking SystemDescription

The Nature Conservancy's Heritage networkspecializes in conducting inventories of rareplants, rare animals, and rare or exemplaryecological communities in order to identifythe most sensitive resources of an area. TheNew York Natural Heritage Program(Heritage) is supported by the NYSDepartment of Environmental Conservation,The Nature Conservancy, and a variety ofgrant and contract monies, and is one of 50such programs nationally.

Heritage inventory focuses on theidentification, documentation, and mappingof all occurrences of rare species and rare orexemplary ecological communities. A"coarse filter/fine filter" approach is used toidentify and prioritize the protection of thesesignificant biological resources. Ecologicalcommunities represent a "coarse filter". Their identification and documentation canbe used to describe whole assemblages ofplant and animal species, both common andrare. The preservation of good examples ofnatural communities assures the protectionof most of the species that make up thebiological diversity of the state. Rareanimals and plants often have narrow orunusual habitat requirements and may not beprotected in the representative communities. Identifying and documenting viablepopulations of each rare species serves asthe "fine filter" for protecting the state'sbiological diversity. This coarse filter/finefilter approach to natural resource inventoryis an efficient means to identify the mostsensitive animals and plants of an area.

Heritage statewide inventory begins bycreating lists of rare species and all types ofecological communities believed to occur in

the state. Lists are based on museum collec-tions, the scientific literature, informationfrom government agencies, input fromknowledgeable experts, and data fromneighboring states. Each species andcommunity is then ranked based onperceived rarity. Heritage ranks rarity atboth global and state levels. The global rankreflects rarity of the species or communityacross its entire range, while the state rankreflects its rarity within New York State. Both ranks are usually based on the number,abundance, range, and vulnerability ofknown occurrences, and are revised as newdata become available. Intraspecific taxaare also assigned a taxon rank to reflect theintraspecific taxon's rank throughout itsrange. The Heritage ranking criteria areenumerated in Table 1 and used throughoutthis report.

Table 1. Explanation of Heritage Ranksand CodesEach element has a global and state rankdetermined by the NY Natural HeritageProgram. These ranks carry no legal weight.

Global Rank:G1 = Critically imperiled globally

because of extreme rarity (5 orfewer occurrences, or very fewremaining acres, or miles ofstream) or especially vulnerable toextinction because of some factorof its biology.

G2 = Imperiled globally because ofrarity (6 - 20 occurrences, or fewremaining acres, or miles ofstream) or very vulnerable toextinction throughout its rangebecause of other factors.

G3 = Either rare and local throughout itsrange (21 - 100 occurrences, orfew remaining acres, or miles ofstream) or found locally (evenabundantly at some of its

54

locations) in a restricted range (e.g., a physiographic region), orvulnerable to extinctionthroughout its range because ofother factors.

G4 = Apparently secure globally, thoughit might be quite rare in parts of itsrange, especially at its periphery.

G5 = Demonstrably secure globally,though it may be quite rare in partsof its range, especially at itsperiphery.

GH = Historically known, with theexpectation that it may berediscovered.

GX = Species believed to be extinct.GU = Status unknown.

State Rank:S1 = Typically 5 or fewer occurrences,

very few remaining individuals,acres, or miles of stream, or somefactor of its biology making itespecially vulnerable in NewYork.

S2 = Typically 6 - 20 occurrences, fewremaining individuals, acres, ormiles of stream, or factorsdemonstrable making it veryvulnerable in New York State.

S3 = Typically 21 - 100 occurrences,limited acreage, or miles of streamin New York State.

S4 = Apparently secure in New YorkState.

S5 = Demonstrably secure in New YorkState.

SH = Historically known from NewYork State, but not seen in the past15 years.

SX = Apparently extirpated from NewYork State.

SE = Exotic, not native to New YorkState.

SR = State report only, no verifiedspecimens known from New York

State.SU = Status unknown.

Taxon (T) Rank:Defined the same way as global ranks, butthe T-rank refers only to the rarity of the sub-specific taxon of the particularspecies.

T1-T5 = See global rank definitions above.Q = A question exists whether or not

the taxon is a good taxonomicentity.

? = A question exists about the rank.

Rare species are protected in New Yorkthrough ranking and listing by the NewYork State Department of EnvironmentalConservation (DEC). The New York StateProtected Plant Law of 1974 prohibits thecollection or destruction of listed protectedplants without prior consent from thelandowner. Violations are punishable by a$25.00 fine per stem. A revised list ofendangered, threatened, and exploitablevulnerable plants was adopted through rule-making in 1989. Criteria for assigningplants to these lists are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. New York State ProtectedNative PlantsThe following categories are defined inregulation 6NYCRR part 193.3 and apply toNYS Conservation Law section 9-1503.

U = Unprotected in New York State

E = Endangered - Listed species arethose with:1. 5 or fewer extant sites,2. Fewer than 1000 individuals,3. Restricted to fewer than 4USES 7.5 minute topographicalmaps, or4. Species listed as endangered byUS Department of Interior, as

55

enumerated in the Code of FederalRegulations 50 CFR 17.11.

T = Threatened - Listed species arethose with:1. 6 to fewer than 20 extant sites,2. 1000 to fewer than 3000individuals,3. Restricted to not less than 4 ormore than 7 USES 7.5 minutetopographical maps, or4. Listed as threatened by USDepartment of Interior, asenumerated in the Code of Federal Regulations 50 CFR17.11.

R = Rare - Listed species have:1. 20 to 35 extant sites, or2. 3000 to 5000 individualsstatewide.

V = Exploitable Vulnerable - Listedspecies are likely to becomethreatened in the near futurethroughout all or a significantportion of their range within thestate if causal factors continueunchecked. (This report does notidentify species in this category).

Animal protection in New York is achievedby listing on the state Endangered,Threatened, and Special Concern SpeciesList. Endangered and Threatened speciesare protected against taking, importation,transportation, possession, or sale. SpecialConcern species usually have no legalprotection unless protected under some otherlegislation. Criteria for listing animalspecies in New York are summarized inTable 3.

Table 3. New York State AnimalProtection StatusCategories of Endangered and Threatenedspecies are defined in NYS EnvironmentalConservation Law section 11-0535. Endangered, Threatened, and SpecialConcern species are listed in regulation6NYCRR 182.5.

E = Endangered - Any species whichmeet one of the following criteria:1. native species in imminentdanger of extirpation or extinctionin New York, or2. species listed as endangered byUS Department of Interior, as enu-merated in the Code of FederalRegulations 500 CFR 17.11.

T = Threatened - Any species whichmeet one of the following criteria:1. native species likely to becomeendangered within the foreseeablefuture in New York.2. species listed as threatened byUS Department of Interior, asenumerated in the Code of FederalRegulations 50 CFR 17.11.

SC = Special Concern - Those specieswhich are not yet recognized asendangered or threatened, but forwhich documented concern existsfor their continued welfare in NewYork.

P = Protected Wildlife (defined inEnvironmental Conservation Law11-0103) - Wild game, protectedwild birds, and endangered speciesof wildlife. (Species in thiscategory within the unique area arenot identified as such in thisreport.)

56

U = Unprotected (defined inEnvironmental Conservation Lawsection 11-0103) - The speciesmay be taken at any time withoutlimit; however, a license may berequired. (Species in this categoryare not identified as such in thisreport.)

G = Game (defined in EnvironmentalConservation Law section 11-0103) - Big or small game species;may normally have an open seasonfor at least part of the year, and areprotected at other times. (Speciesin this category are not identifiedas such in this report.)

57

Appendix D - Breeding Bird Atlas Information for the Area

New York State Breeding Bird AtlasBreeding bird species of Oswego County, NY: 1980-1985 data.

Common Name Scientific Name NY ProtectedStatus

StateRank

Alder Flycatcher Empidonax alnorum Protected S5

American Crow Corvus brachyrhynchos Game Species S5

American Goldfinch Carduelis tristis Protected S5

American Kestrel Falco sparverius Protected S5

American Redstart Setophaga ruticilla Protected S5

American Robin Turdus migratorius Protected S5

Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica Protected S5

Black-and-white Warbler Mniotilta varia Protected S5

Black-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus Protected S5

Black-capped Chickadee Parus atricapillus Protected S5

Barred Owl Strix varia Protected S5

Belted Kingfisher Ceryle alcyon Protected S5

Brown-headed Cowbird Molothrus ater Protected S5

Bank Swallow Riparia riparia Protected S5

Blue Jay Cyanocitta cristata Protected S5

Blackburnian Warbler Dendroica fusca Protected S5

Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus Protected S5

Brown Creeper Certhia americana Protected S5

Brown Thrasher Toxostoma rufum Protected S5

Black-throated Blue Warbler Dendroica caerulescens Protected S5

Black-throated Green Warbler Dendroica virens Protected S5

Broad-winged Hawk Buteo platypterus Protected S5

58

Canada Warbler Wilsonia canadensis Protected S5

Cedar Waxwing Bombycilla cedrorum Protected S5

Chipping Sparrow Spizella passerina Protected S5

Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Protected S5

Cliff Swallow Hirundo pyrrhonota Protected S5

American Crow Corvus brachyrhynchos Game Species S5

Northern Flicker Colaptes auratus Protected S5

Common Grackle Quiscalus quiscula Protected S5

Common Snipe Gallinago gallinago Game Species S5

Common Yellowthroat Geothlypis trichas Protected S5

Chestnut-sided Warbler Dendroica pensylvanica Protected S5

Downy Woodpecker Picoides pubescens Protected S5

Eastern Bluebird Sialia sialis Protected-SpecialConcern

S5

Eastern Kingbird Tyrannus tyrannus Protected S5

Eastern Meadowlark Sturnella magna Protected S5

Eastern Phoebe Sayornis phoebe Protected S5

Eastern Wood-Pewee Contopus virens Protected S5

Field Sparrow Spizella pusilla Protected S5

Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias Protected S5

Great Crested Flycatcher Myiarchus crinitus Protected S5

Golden-crowned Kinglet Regulus satrapa Protected S5

Great Horned Owl Bubo virginianus Protected S5

Gray Catbird Dumetella carolinensis Protected S5

Green-backed Heron Butorides striatus Protected S5

Golden-winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera Protected S4

Hairy Woodpecker Picoides villosus Protected S5

59

Hermit Thrush Catharus guttatus Protected S5

House Sparrow Passer domesticus Unprotected SE

House Wren Troglodytes aedon Protected S5

Indigo Bunting Passerina cyanea Protected S5

Killdeer Charadrius vociferus Protected S5

Least Flycatcher Empidonax minimus Protected S5

Mallard Anas platyrhynchos Game Species S5

Magnolia Warbler Dendroica magnolia Protected S5

Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura Protected S5

Mourning Warbler Oporornis philadelphia Protected S5

Nashville Warbler Vermivora ruficapilla Protected S5

Northern Oriole Icterus galbula Protected S5

Osprey Pandion haliaetus Threatened S4

Ovenbird Seiurus aurocapillus Protected S5

Purple Finch Carpodacus purpureus Protected S5

Rose-breasted Grosbeak Pheucticus ludovicianus Protected S5

Red-breasted Nuthatch Sitta canadensis Protected S5

Red-eyed Vireo Vireo olivaceus Protected S5

Rock Dove Columba livia Unprotected SE

Red-shouldered Hawk Buteo lineatus Threatened S4

Rufous-sided Towhee Pipilo erythrophthalmus Protected S5

Red-tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis Protected S5

Ruby-throated Hummingbird Archilochus colubris Protected S5

Ruffed Grouse Bonasa umbellus Game Species S5

Red-winged Blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus Protected S5

Savannah Sparrow Passerculussandwichensis

Protected S5

Scarlet Tanager Piranga olivacea Protected S5

60

Song Sparrow Melospiza melodia Protected S5

Solitary Vireo Vireo solitarius Protected S5

Sharp-shinned Hawk Accipiter striatus Protected S4

European Starling Sturnus vulgaris Unprotected SE

Tree Swallow Tachycineta bicolor Protected S5

Wild Turkey Meleagris gallopavo Game Species S5

Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura Protected S4

Veery Catharus fuscescens Protected S5

Warbling Vireo Vireo gilvus Protected S5

White-breasted Nuthatch Sitta carolinensis Protected S5

Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Protected S5

Whippoorwill Caprimulgus vociferus Protected S4

White-throated Sparrow Zonotrichia albicollis Protected S5

Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus Protected S5

Yellow-bellied Sapsucker Sphyrapicus varius Protected S5

Yellow Warbler Dendroica petechia Protected S5

Yellow-rumped Warbler Dendroica coronata Protected S5

Yellow-throated Vireo Vireo flavifrons Protected S5

* See Appendix C, page 20, for definition of these ranks.

61

Appendix E - Listing of Mammals, Amphibians and Reptiles

General listing of mammals, amphibians, and reptiles known or suspected to be present on the Salmon RiverFalls Management Unit.

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Common Name Scientific Name Classification *_______________________________________________________________________________________MAMMALSVirginia opossum Didelphis virginiana GMasked shrew Sorex cinereus ULeast shrew Cryptotis parva UShorttail shrew Blarina brevicauda UStar-nosed mole Condylura cristata UEastern mole Scalopus aquaticus ULittle brown bat Myotis lucifugus UKeen's myotis Myotis keenii UIndiana bat Myotis sodalis ESmall-footed myotis Myotis leibii USilver-haired bat Lasionycteris noctivagans UEastern pipistrelle Pipistrellus subflavus UBig brown bat Eptesicus fuscus URed bat Lasiurus borealis UHoary bat Lasiurus cinereus URaccoon Procyon lotor GShorttail weasel (Ermine) Mustela erminea GLongtail weasel Mustela frenata GMink Mustela vison GStriped skunk Mephitis mephitis GCoyote Canis latrans GRed fox Vulpes vulpes GGray fox Urocyon cinereoargenteus GBobcat Lynx rufus GWoodchuck Marmota monax UEastern chipmunk Tamias striatus UGray squirrel Sciurus carolinensis GRed squirrel Tamiasciurus hudsonicus UDeer mouse Peromyscus maniculatus UWhite-footed mouse Peromyscus leucopus USo. bog lemming Synaptomys cooperi U

62

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Common Name Scientific Name Classification *_______________________________________________________________________________________MAMMALSSo. red backed vole Clethrionomys gapperi UMeadow vole Microtus pennsylvanicus UPine vole Pitymys pinetorum UMuskrat Ondatra zibethicus GMeadow jumping mouse Zapus hudsonius UWoodland jumping mouse Napaeozapus insignis UVarying hare Lepus americanus GEastern cottontail Sylvilagus floridanus GWhite-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus G_______________________________________________________________________________________AMPHIBIANSMarbled salamander Ambystoma opacum UJefferson salamander Ambystoma jeffersonianum U-SCBlue-spotted salamander Ambystoma Iaterale U-SCSpotted salamander Ambystoma maculatum U-SCRed-spotted newt Notophthalmus viridescens UDusky salamander Desmognathus fuscus UMountain dusky salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus URedback salamander Plethodon cinereus USlimy salamander Plethodon glutinosus UFour-toed salamander Hemidactylium scutatum USpring salamander Gyrinophilus porphyriticus URed salamander Pseudotriton ruber UTwo-lined salamander Eurycea bislineata ULongtail salamander Eurycea longicauda UEastern spadefoot Scaphiopus holbrookii UAmerican toad Bufo americanus UNorthern cricket frog Acris crepitans TSpring peeper Hyla crucifer UGray treefrog Hyla versicolor UBullfrog Rana catesbeiana GGreen frog Rana clamitans GWood frog Rana sylvatica GPickerel frog Rana palustris G

_______________________________________________________________________________________

63

Common Name Scientific Name Classification *_______________________________________________________________________________________REPTILESCommon snapping turtle Chelydra serpentina UStinkpot Sternotherus odoratus USpotted turtle Clemmys guttata U-SCWood turtle Clemmys insculpta G-SCEastern box turtle Terrapene carolina G-SCEastern painted turtle Chrysemys picta UFive-lined skink Eumeces fasciatus UNorthern water snake Nerodia sipedon UBrown snake Storeria dekayi URedbelly snake Storeria occiptomaculata UCommon garter snake Thamnophis sirtalis UEastern ribbon snake Thamnophis sauritus UEastern hognose snake Heterodon platyrhinos U-SCRingneck snake Diadophis punctatus UWorm snake Carphophis amoenus U-SCRacer Coluber constrictor USmooth green snake Opheodrys vernalis URat snake Elaphe obsoleta UMilk snake Lampropeltis triangulum UCopperhead Agkistrodon contortrix UTimber rattlesnake Crotalus horridus T_______________________________________________________________________________________

* See Appendix C, pages 21-22, for definition of these classifications.

64

Appendix F - Fishery Evaluation of the Area

Results of USGS Tunison Laboratory Aquatic Survey of the Bypass Reach, conducted by JamesMcKenna, July/August 2001.

Mean Catch per Unit of Effort (by numbers) of Fish from Five Electro-Fishing SamplesCollected from the Salmon River between the Falls and the Lighthouse Hill Reservoir

Species Mean Abundance % of total

Blacknose Dace 159.7878 30.47%Fantail Darter 127.9088 24.39%White Sucker 98.26672 18.74%Cutlips Minnow 33.29033 6.35%Common Shiner 20.58261 3.93%Central Stoneroller 16.9478 3.23%Longnose Dace 13.94631 2.66%Shiner spp. 11.54639

2.20%Creek Chub 10.64355 2.03%Rock Bass 8.874099 1.69%Tessellated Darter 8.322522 1.59%Bluntnose Minnow 5.449703 1.04%Largemouth Bass 2.588279 0.49%Redside Dace 2.318718 0.44%Blacknose Shiner 1.999667 0.38%Brown Bullhead 0.796157 0.15%Rainbow Trout 0+ 0.456934 0.09%Bluegill 0.369754 0.07%Smallmouth Bass 0.294247 0.06%

Green frogs, salamanders, and crayfish were also found in the river sampling.

65

Appendix G

66

Appendix H - Laws, Rules andRegulations Governing theManagement and Use of StateLands

The Americans With Disabilities ActAccessibility Guidelines (ADAAG)

The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)is a federal law which requires thatprograms and facilities are made accessiblefor individuals with disabilities. ADAAGhas been developed to ensure that buildings,facilities, programs and vehicles covered bythe ADA are accessible to individuals withdisabilities, in terms of architecture anddesign, transportation and communication. A federal agency known as the AccessBoard has developed such guidelines andhas issued the ADAAG for this purpose. Current ADAAG addresses the builtenvironment, including buildings, ramps,sidewalks, rooms within buildings, etc. TheAccess Board has proposed guidelines toexpand ADAAG to cover outdoor developedfacilities such as trails, campgrounds, picnicareas and beaches. The proposed ADAAGis presented in the September 1999 FinalReport of the Regulatory NegotiationCommittee for Outdoor Developed AreasReport. Until such time as ADAAGbecomes an adopted rule of the Departmentof Justice, we must use the best informationavailable to comply with the ADA andADAAG, which includes the Report.

ADAAG Application:ADAAG applies to newly constructedstructures and facilities and alterations toexisting structures and facilities. Further, itapplies to fixed structures or facilities, i.e.,those that are attached to the earth oranother structure that is attached to theearth. Therefore, when the Department isplanning the construction of newrecreational facilities or elements in support

of recreational facilities, or is considering analteration of existing recreational facilitiesor elements supporting them, it must alsoconsider providing access to the facilities orelements for people with disabilities, usingthe adopted ADAAG for buildings, theproposed ADAAG for outdoor developedareas, the New York State Uniform FirePrevention and Building Codes and otherappropriate information to accomplish thattask. The standards which exist in ADAAGor are contained in the proposed ADAAGprovide guidance to achieve modificationsto trails, picnic areas, campgrounds (or sites)and beaches in order to obtain programmaticcompliance with the ADA.

The following types of facilities or elementspertaining to those facilities are examples towhich adopted and proposed ADAAGwould apply: parking areas, pedestriantrails, outdoor access routes, sanitaryfacilities, trail registers, informationalbulletin boards, kiosks, interpretive trailnarratives, equestrian support elementsincluding platforms and stalls, campgroundsor campsites including tent pads, sinks,restrooms or privies, water supply spigots,hydrants and drinking fountains, cookingsurfaces including pedestal grills and firerings with grills, picnic tables, trashcontainers, fire rings, lean-to’s and warminghuts.

Universal Design:As those who currently enjoy state forestsage and as more people discover therecreational opportunities on state forests,the fixtures and facilities available for publicuse must accommodate a wider range ofabilities and users. Universal Design is thedesign of products and environments to beusable by all people, to the greatest extentpossible. Incorporating Universal Designinto recreational facilities is importantbecause it allows people with diverse

67

preferences and abilities to enjoy and use thefacilities.

Universal Design is based upon thefollowing principles which are those used bythe National Center on Accessability atIndiana University and were originallyestablished by the Center for UniversalDesign at North Carolina State University.

Principles of Universal Design:1. Equitable Use - The design is useful topeople with diverse abilities.2. Flexibility in Use - The designaccommodates a wide range of individualpreferences and abilities.3. Simple and Intuitive Use - Use of thedesign is easy to understand, regardless ofthe user’s experience, knowledge, languageskills or current concentration level.4. Perceptible Information - The designcommunicates information effectively to theuser, regardless of the conditions or theuser’s sensory abilities.5. Tolerance for Error - The designminimizes hazards and the adverseconsequences of accidental or unintendedactions.6. Low Physical Effort - The design can beused efficiently and comfortably with aminimum of fatigue.7. Size and Space for Approach and Use -Appropriate size and space is provided forapproach, reach, manipulation, and useregardless of the user’s body size, posture,or mobility.

Environmental Conservation Law (ECL)

Article 9 Lands and ForestsArticle 11 Fish and WildlifeArticle 15 Water ResourcesArticle 23 Mineral ResourcesArticle 24 WetlandsArticle 33 PesticidesArticle 51 Implementation of

Environmental Quality BondAct of 1972

Article 52 Implementation ofEQBA of 1986

Article 71 Enforcement

New York Code of Rules and Regulations(NYCRR)

Title 6 - Chapter I Fish and Wildlife Chapter II Lands and Forests Chapter III Air Resources Chapter IV Quality Services Chapter V Resource

Management Services Chapter VII (A) Implementation

of EQBA of 1972 Chapter X Division of Water

Resources

Parks, Recreation, and HistoricPreservation Law

Article 14 - Chapter 354 Cultural andHistoric Resources

Department Policies

Public UseState Forest Master PlanTemporary Revocable PermitsInventoryMotor Vehicle UseAcquisitionTimber ManagementRoad ConstructionUnit Management PlanningFish Species ManagementPesticidesHabitat Management Prescribed BurningWild Species Management

68

Appendix IIce Climbing at Salmon River Falls Unique Area - Registration Form

Ice climbing within Salmon River Falls Unique Areais allowed only with daily registration. Eachindividual climber must fill out the form below anddeposit in the registration box prior to entering thegorge.

The purpose of this registration is to have up-to-date information of climbers within the gorge in case of anemergency. The registration information may also beused in future planning for the area.

One mode of access to the base of the gorge is byway of the Gorge Trail. This trail is closed seasonallyfrom November 15th thru May 1st due to the potentialfor high water or icy conditions. This trail is open toregistered ice climbers.

Please be advised that this area is not regularlypatrolled. It is recommended that all climbers climbin pairs in case of an emergency or accident.

Area Concerns for Climbers:Fast Rising Water: The Salmon River Reservoir Damis located 1 mile upstream of the falls. In the event of a high water release, there is very little notice of fastrising water. If you notice the water rising, move tohigher ground and do not try and cross the river.

Threatened Plant Species: The Birds-Eye Primroseand the Yellow Mountain Saxifrage are two Statelisted threatened plant species which grow on thesteep cliffs and rock ledges within the gorge. Theseplants live in very vulnerable soils which can beeasily disturbed. Ice climbing has been considerednot detrimental to the plants’ habitat since climbing isdone on thick formations of ice. It is important for iceclimbers to be aware of the concern for these plantsand their habitat and that they only climb in areasfully covered by ice to minimize disturbance. Plantpopulations within the gorge will be monitored andsteps will be taken to ensure their survival.

Ice Climbing Guidelines and Area Restrictions

• Climbing is not allowed without registering. To register, fill out the attached form and place in the registrationbox prior to each day’s entry into the gorge.

• No climbing is allowed within the designated restricted area or on the face of the falls.• Climbers must be equipped with conventional ice climbing gear such as helmet, ice axe, crampons, etc.• Climbing in areas without ice and conventional rock climbing are prohibited.• Ice climbing on this property is at your own risk.• No open fires.• No possession of glass containers or alcoholic beverages.• No motorized vehicles, including snowmobiles, on the property.• The area is closed from sunset to sunrise.

-----------------------------------------------Tear here and place in registration box--------------------------------------------------

Ice Climbing Registration Form

Please fill out this form and place in the registration box if ice climbing on the Salmon River Falls Unique Area.

Date Climbing:______________________ Name:__________________________________________

Arrival Time:_______________________ Address:________________________________________

Estimated Departure Time:____________ City:______________________ State ____ Zip_________

License Plate #:_____________________ Phone #:_______________________

Signature:

(Optional) Email Address:______________________ Affiliated Group (if any):________________________

By signing this form you are agreeing to abide by the areas guidelines and restrictions.All information will be kept confidential and used for emergencies and management planning only.

69

Appendix J - Public Comments and Responses

PUBLIC COMMENTS

Comments on the draft plan were received at the public meeting on April 10, 2003. Commentswere accepted in written form until May 10, 2003. The following represents a summary of thecomments on major issues that were received, followed by the Department response.

1. Comment: Would like to keep the area open to ice climbing.Response: Based upon the numerous comments requesting to climb in the gorge area

from ice climbing enthusiasts the Department has decided to allow iceclimbing outside of the restricted area and by mandatory registration.

2. Comment: Develop a loop trail from Wooliver Road and joining the Falls Trail andUpper Falls Trail.

Response: A new trail has been proposed from the parking area to Bennetts Bridgewhich would connect to the Falls Trail and incorporate Wooliver Road.An additional loop trailis also proposed to the west of the Wooliver Road.

3. Comment: Develop overlooks, trails and picnic facilities to encourage people to stayon rim and away from lower gorge.

Response: The Falls Trail and two new overlooks have been developed to providebetter access and allow better views of the gorge in safer areas. Arestricted area has been designated to restrict people from ecologicallysensitive and potentially dangerous areas in the gorge.

4. Comment Encourage local user groups to help with maintenance of the trails.Response: As the need arises and local groups show interest, volunteers will be

utilized to help maintain the trails.

5. Comment: Would like to propose to not have set dates for trail closings.Response: The closure of trails has been set during times in which hazardous

conditions from icing are occurring. During this same time the trails areclosed, the DEC’s staffing is limited and the ability to check to see if thetrails should be closed on a daily basis is limited. The gorge trail will beopen to registered ice climbers during these seasonal closures.

6. Comment: Consider a permit system for ice climbing to make sure users have properequipment and experience.

Response: A mandatory registration has been designed for ice climbing whichrequires climbers to use the proper equipment needed and what areas areavailable to climb at. Each climber will have to sign a registration formevery time they climb agreeing to follow all the guidelines on the form.

7. Comment: The plan improperly associates ice climbing with rock climbing and sportrappelling.

70

Response: Since being in contact with ice climbers and getting better informed onwhat is involved with ice climbing during the comment period, it is agreedthat ice climbing, rappelling and rock climbing are not all the same. Dueto this differentiation between the types of climbing, specific restrictionshave been developed to address each type.

8. Comment: The Salmon River gorge is a truly unique ice climbing resource.Response: Prior to the public presentation of the plan and the comment period, there

was little known information by the DEC that the area was so unique forice climbing. Since then, the DEC is changing the plan to accommodateice climbing while still maintaining protection on the areas most sensitiveto use.

9. Comment: If the DEC is unwilling to allow ice climbing on the main falls at thistime, we urge that the plan contain a moratorium rather than an outrightbar so that following two or three years of experience appropriatemanagers can reassess whether ice climbing on the falls presents abonafide concern. If it does not, ice climbing can be allowed on the mainfalls without having to reopen the plan.

Response:

10. Comment Do not restrict winter access to the Gorge Trail. Instead provide amplesignage regarding “rough and hazardous terrain” and recommendationsthat proper equipment be required to enter the gorge.

Response: Due to safety concerns and the inability to monitor usage the trail closurewill remain. The trail is however open for those who register as an iceclimber with proper equipment required.

11. Comment: Restrict ice climbing to those areas that have ice. The information boardat the parking area should include information about the rare andthreatened plants and clearly state the “stay on the ice” policy that couldbe practiced to protect them.

Response: Ice climbing is allowed out side of the designated restricted area. Climbersare also directed to only climb in areas with adequate ice. There will alsobe information posted near the ice climbing registration box and on theregistration form. It will explain the concerns for the threatened plantspecies and potential high water risks for ice climbers.

12. Comment: Install a sign-in register so that the ice climbing activity can be monitoredand adjustments made to the plan according to actual use.

Response: A mandatory ice climbing registration sign in has been installed. This willhelp monitor usage and is effects as well as facilitate emergency measuresif needed.

13. Comment: Produce an education brochure to raise awareness on special access issuesof the area, such as the rare and threatened plants, proper access points,proper gear, and so on.

71

Response: An area brochure will be developed after the initiation of the final planand information on main management concerns will be included.

14. Comment: The DEC and local ice climbers work together with local Search andRescue to enhance their preparedness for dealing with wintertime rescues.

Response: The Department will continue to support the local Volunteer FireDepartment and other interested parties in providing adequate search andrescue resources.

15. Comment: All ice climbing advocates agreed that the gorge is an inappropriate placefor rock climbing and sport rappelling because of the loose rock and rareand threatened plant species.

Response: The Department agrees with this assessment of rock climbing andrappelling and will restrict these activities on the Unit.

16. Comment: Due to the lack of training in ice climbing for the local firemen, the areashould remain closed to ice climbing.

Response:

17. Comment: All ATV traffic should remain restricted from this area.Response: There are no motorized vehicles allowed, including ATV’s, on the area.

18. Comment: References in the plan to Reliant Power Corporation and Reliant EnergyCorporation should be changed to Reliant Energy.

Response: Since this comment was made another ownership change has occured withthe new name being Brascan Power Corporation. This change will bemade to the document.

19. Comment: While the UMP acknowledges the potential for rapid flow fluctuations inthe river, the UMP does not address how the DEC intends to activelymanage it proposed uses with respect to this obvious hazard.

Response: The plan calls for the installation of w early warning system for high waterreleases to be operated in conjunction with the power company and theirhydroelectric facilities.

20. Comment: The UMP subjects Brascan Power to undue liability and attempts toformalize Reliant’s informal effort to notify recreationists and should beremoved from the UMP.

Response: This section of the first draft has been removed and steps proposed toformalize a notification of recreationist by the Departments personnel.

21. Comment: Brascan Power is opposed to unrestricted public access or activity in anysection of the riverbed of this area that may be impacted by high waterflow fluctuation, especially above the falls.

72

Response: This plan has taken these concerns into consideration and has proposedclosing trails in the event of high water flows. Warning signs are plannedas well as an alarm system to be installed for the purpose warning thepublic of high water flow fluctuations.

22. Comment: The UMP does not reference warning signage related to water releases. Brascan Power suggests water release warning signage be provided andmaintained at several areas along the existing and proposed trails.

Response: This has been addressed within the plan to install and maintain these typeof signs.

23. Comment: Brascan Power does not operate or currently have licensed any publicswimming areas at Lighthouse Hill and Salmon River Reservoirs and anyreferences of such should be removed from this plan.

Response: Reference to these areas has been removed from the plan.

24. Comment: Reference in UMP to a trail from Bennetts Bridge Powerhouse from theplan area should be limited to a proposal only as no definitive arrangementhas been agreed to where the trail has to cross Brascan Power property.

Response: The discussion of this trail has been reworded to present it as a proposalonly in light approval from land owners the trail would have to cross.

25. Comment: Paint ball/splat ball should be restricted from this area.Response: Due to the problems with graffiti, all forms of paint including paint balls

are prohibited on the Unit.

26. Comment: The Salmon River Falls gorge is the best and closest area for ice climbingin Central New York.

Response: After gaining more information about the availability of this recreationalresource the plan calls for the continuation of ice climbing under acontroled registration system.

27. Comment: To meet the needs of the ice climbers and the local Volunteer Firemen,suggest a permit system for allowing ice climbing.

Response: A mandatory registration system for ice climbing has been put in place tohelp meet the concerns of all interested parties.

28. Comment: Ice climbing statistics show a low occurrence of accidents and doesn’tbelieve that numbers of ice climbers will increase using the area.

Response: The registration system proposed for ice climbing will monitor use to helpguide future management decisions.

29. Comment: The ice climbing community would like to help support the training needsof the local Volunteer Firemen responsible for rescues on the area.

Response: The Department will continue to support the local Volunteer FireDepartment and other interested parties in providing adequate search and

73

rescue resources for the Unit.30. Comment: While the plan acknowledges many of the aspects of the Salmon River

Watershed, Rivers United believes there is a need to link a morecomprehensive planning process to the overall corridor.

Response: Due heavy use of the Unit and the safety concerns involved with the Fallsand gorge the Department felt it a priority to address this site specifically.

31. Comment: Has the state acquired a large wetland complex in the area and is itaddressed in another plan?

Response: The Department has acquired other lands within the Salmon RiverWatershed which include wetlands. All lands managed by the Departmentwill be included in a Unit Management Plan as planning initiatives moveforward.

32. Comment: The relationship of this area to its headwaters on Tug Hill should beexpanded.

Response: This plan is focused primarily on the goals, objectives and actions whichwill take place on this Unit.

33. Comment: A more detailed reporting of water flows should be required andinformation available on the internet should be mentioned in the plan.

Response:

34. Comment: Securing a biological flow by increasing flow rates for the bypass reachshould be addressed in this plan to improve the fishery in this area.

Response:

35. Comment: New York Rivers United strongly supports the protection of the areathrough increased state acquisition.

Response: The Department is currently pursuing acquisition efforts for parcelsadjoining the Unit as well as others along the Salmon River.

36. Comment: The Salmon River gorge provides for multiple users; the plan shouldaddress all of those needs.

Response: The plan addresses and provides actions for the projected demands byusers in a way that protects the ecological integrity of the area whileallowing for specific recreational uses.

74

Appendix K - SEQR 617.20Appendix A

State Environmental Quality ReviewFULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM

Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action maybe significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of aproject that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formalknowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge inone particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance.

The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination processhas been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:

Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, itassists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.

Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It providesguidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.

Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not theimpact is actually important.

DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions

Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: x Part 1 x Part 2 Part 3

Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, andconsidering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that:

x A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have asignificant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.

B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect forthis Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore aCONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*

C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on theenvironment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.

*A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions

Preparation of Salmon River Falls Unique Area Draft Management PlanName of Action

New York State Department of Environmental ConservationName of Lead Agency

Daniel J. Sawchuck Senior ForesterPrint or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer

Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer)

Date

75

PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATIONPrepared by Project Sponsor

NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on theenvironment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of theapplication for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe willbe needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.

It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies,research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance.

NAME OF ACTION

Preparation and review of the Salmon River Fall Unique Area Unit Management Plan.LOCATION OF ACTION (INCLUDE STREET ADDRESS, MUNICIPALITY AND COUNTY) Falls Road, Town of Orwell , Oswego CountyNAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE

NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (607) 753-3095ADDRESS

1285 Fisher Ave.CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE

Cortland NY 13045-1090NAME OF OWNER (IF DIFFERENT) BUSINESS TELEPHONE

( )ADDRESS

CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE

DESCRIPTION OF ACTION

This plan outlines management objectives and actions necessary in protecting the area while allowing recreationalopportunities such as hiking, hunting , fishing, ice climbing and site seeing.

Plan Highlights: The plan calls for the construction of two new foot trails and improvements to two existing trailsfor recreational hiking use.

This plan will direct all management activities for a 10-year period dating from the time of adoption. Authority toconstruct and adopt the plan is derived from Section 9 of the Environmental Conservation Law.

Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable

A. SITE DESCRIPTIONPhysical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.1. Present Land Use: Urban Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm)

x Forest Agriculture x Other 110 ‘ Water Falls

2. Total acreage of project area: 112 acres. PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION

APPROXIMATE ACREAGE acres acresMeadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acresForested 101 acres 101 acresAgricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acresWetland(Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0.3 acres 0.3 acresWater Surface Area 10 acres 10 acresUnvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acresRoads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres

76

Other (Indicate type) acres acres3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Colton-Hinckley & Worth-Empeyville

a. Soil drainage: x Well drained 60 % of site x Moderately well drained 33 % of site.

x Poorly drained 7 % of siteb. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within

soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? Acres (see 1NYCRR 370).4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? X YES NO

a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 5+5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: x 0-10% 28 % x 10-15% 15 %

x 15% or greater 60 %

6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or NationalRegisters of Historic Places?

YES x NO

7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? YES x NO

8. What is the depth of the water table? 5+ (in feet)

9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? X YES NO

10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? X YES NO

11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened orendangered?

X YES NO

According to: Natural Heritage ProgramIdentify each species: Birds-eye primrose (Primula mistassinica) Yellow mountain saxafrage (Saxifrage aizoides)

12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geologicalformations?

X YES NO

Describe: Site includes the Salmon River which flows over a 110 - foot water fall and through a gorgewhich continues off the property.

13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreationarea?

X YES NO

If yes, explain: This site is visited by large numbers of people coming to view the water falls and gorge and hike alongthe river.

14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? X YES NO

15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Salmon Rivera. Name of Stream and name of River to

which it is tributaryLake Ontario

16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:a. Name: A portion of DEC Class 2 Freshwater Wetland designated OR-19b. Size (in acres): 0.3 acres within site 23.9 total acres of wetland

17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? X YES NO

a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? X YES NO

b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? X YES NO

18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304?

YES x NO

19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant toArticle 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617?

YES x NO

20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? YES x NO

B. Project Description1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate).

a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 112 acres.b. Project acreage to be developed: 0 acres initially; 0 acres ultimately.

77

c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 112 acres.d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate)e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 25 ; proposedg. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour N/A (upon completion of project)?

h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium

Initially 0 0 0 0Ultimately 0 0 0 0

I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure – height; – width; – length.J. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? – ft.

2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards.3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? X N/A YES NO

a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed?

b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? YES NO

c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? YES NO

4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres.5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this

project?YES x NO

6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction N/A months, (including demolition)

7. If multi-phased:a. Total number of phases anticipated 10 (number)

b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 6 month 2004 year, (including demolition)

c. Approximate completion date of final phase 12 month 2014 year.

d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? YES x NO

8. Will blasting occur during construction? YES x NO

9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 0 ; after project is complete 0

10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 011. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? YES x NO

If yes, explain:

12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? YES x NO

a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amountb. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged

13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Type YES x NO

14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? YES x NO

If yes, explain:

15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? YES x NO

16. Will the project generate solid waste? YES x NO

a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons

b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? YES NO

c. If yes, give name ; location

d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? YES NO

e. If yes, explain:

17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? YES x NO

a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month.

78

b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.

18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? YES x NO

19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? YES x NO

20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? YES x NO

21. Will project result in an increase in energy use?YES x NO

If yes, indicate type(s)

22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute.

23. Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallons/day.

24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? X YES NO

If yes, explain: The Plan calls for trail construction and improvements which will require capital funding toaccomplish.

25. Approvals Required:TYPE SUBMITTAL DATE

City, Town, Village Board YES x NO

City, Town, Village Planning Board YES x NO

City, Town Zoning Board YES x NO

City, County Health Department YES x NO

Other Local Agencies YES x NO

Other Regional Agencies YES x NO

State Agencies x YES NO

Federal Agencies YES x NO

C. Zoning and Planning Information1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? YES x NO

If Yes, indicate decision required: Zoning amendment Zoning variance New/revision of master plan Subdivision

Site plan Special use permit Resource management plan Other

2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? N/A

3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?

N/A

4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A

5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?

N/A

6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? X YES NO

7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action?N/A8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a ¼ mile? X YES NO

9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/Aa. What is the minimum lot size proposed?

10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? YES x NO

11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education,police, fire protection?

YES x NO

a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? YES NO

12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? YES x NO

79

a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. YES NO

D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associatedwith your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them.

E. VerificationI certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.

Applicant/Sponsor Name Daniel J. Sawchuck Date 2/03/2004

Signature Title Senior Forester

If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceedingwith this assessment.

80

PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDEResponsibility of Lead Agency

General Information (Read Carefully)! In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer

is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.! The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would

trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specificproject or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation inPart 3.

! The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered asguidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.

! The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.! In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects.

Instructions (Read carefully)a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact

threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, checkcolumn 1.

d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact mustbe evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further.

e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the

Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3.

IMPACT ON LAND 1Small to Moderate

Impact

2Potential Large

Impact

3Can Impact be Mitigated

by Project Change1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical

change to the project site?X NO YES

Examples that would apply to column 2C Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of

length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%.Yes No

C Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. Yes No

C Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. Yes No

C Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet ofexisting ground surface.

Yes No

C Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than onephase or stage.

Yes No

C Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons ofnatural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year.

Yes No

C Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. Yes No

C Construction in a designated floodway. Yes No

C Other impacts Yes No

2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusualland forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes,geological)

Yes Nox NO YES

C Specific land forms: Yes No

81

1Small to Moderate

Impact

2Potential Large

Impact

3Can Impact be Mitigated

by Project Change

IMPACT ON WATER3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under

Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL)x NO YES

Examples that would apply to column 2C Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Yes No

C Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protectedstream.

Yes No

C Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. Yes No

C Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Yes No

C Other impacts

Yes No4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water?

x NO YESExamples that would apply to column 2C A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more

than a 10 acre increase or decrease.Yes No

C Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Yes No

C Other impacts

Yes No5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity?

x NO YESExamples that would apply to column 2C Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Yes No

C Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approvalto serve proposed (project) action.

Yes No

C Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity.

Yes No

C Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. Yes No

C Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. Yes No

C Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently donot exist or have inadequate capacity.

Yes No

C Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Yes No

C Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast tonatural conditions.

Yes No

C Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons.

Yes No

C Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/orsewer services.

Yes No

C Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may requirenew or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities.

Yes No

C Other impacts

Yes No

1Small to Moderate

Impact

2Potential Large

Impact

3Can Impact be Mitigated

by Project Change

82

6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff?x NO YES

Examples that would apply to column 2C Proposed Action would change flood water flows Yes No

C Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Yes No

C Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Yes No

C Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Yes No

C Other impactsYes No

IMPACT ON AIR7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality?

x NO YESExamples that would apply to column 2C Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Yes No

C Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse perhour.

Yes No

C Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat sourceproducing more than 10 million BTU’s per hour.

Yes No

C Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed toindustrial use.

Yes No

C Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of industrialdevelopment within existing industrial areas.

Yes No

C Other impactsYes No

IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species?

x NO YESExamples that would apply to column 2C Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using

the site, over or near the site, or found on the site.Yes No

C Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Yes No

C Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than foragricultural purposes.

Yes No

C Other impactsYes No

9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangeredspecies?

x NO YESExamples that would apply to column 2C Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory

fish, shellfish or wildlife species.Yes No

C Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest(over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation.

Yes No

IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?

1Small to Moderate

Impact

2Potential Large

Impact

3Can Impact be Mitigated

by Project Change

83

x NO YESExamples that would apply to column 2C The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land

(includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)Yes No

C Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agriculturalland.

Yes No

C The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ofagricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acresof agricultural land.

Yes No

C The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural landmanagement systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, stripcropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drainpoorly due to increased runoff).

C Other impactsYes No

IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual

EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.)x NO YES

Examples that would apply to column 2C Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp

contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made ornatural.

Yes No

C Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aestheticresources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of theaesthetic qualities of that resource.

Yes No

C Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screeningof scenic views known to be important to the area.

Yes No

C Other impacts

Yes No

IMPACT ON HISTORIC ANDARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES

12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric orpaleontological importance?

x NO YESExamples that would apply to column 2C Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially

contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register ofhistoric places.

Yes No

C Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the projectsite.

Yes No

C Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive forarchaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.

Yes No

C Other impactsYes No

IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open

spaces or recreational opportunities?

1Small to Moderate

Impact

2Potential Large

Impact

3Can Impact be Mitigated

by Project Change

84

x NO YESExamples that would apply to column 2C The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. Yes No

C A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Yes No

C Other impactsYes No

IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTALAREAS

14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of acritical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision6NYCRR 617.14(g)?

x NO YES

Examples that would apply to column 2C Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? Yes No

C Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? Yes No

C Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? Yes No

C Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? Yes No

C Other impacts

Yes No

IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems?

x NO YESExamples that would apply to column 2C Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Yes No

C Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. Yes No

C Other impactsYes No

IMPACT ON ENERGY16. Will Proposed Action affect the community’s sources of fuel or energy

supply?x NO YES

Examples that would apply to column 2C Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form

of energy in the municipality.Yes No

C Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energytransmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two familyresidences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.

Yes No

1Small to Moderate

Impact

2Potential Large

Impact

3Can Impact be Mitigated

by Project Change

85

C Other impacts

Yes No

NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the

Proposed Action?x NO YES

Examples that would apply to column 2C Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Yes No

C Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Yes No

C Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambientnoise levels for noise outside of structures.

Yes No

C Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Yes No

C Other impactsYes No

IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?

x NO YESExamples that would apply to column 2C Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous

substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event ofaccident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge oremission.

Yes No

C Proposed Action may result in the burial of “hazardous wastes” in any form(i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.)

Yes No

C Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied natural gas orother flammable liquids.

Yes No

C Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste.

Yes No

C Other impactsYes No

IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTEROF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD

19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community?x NO YES

Examples that would apply to column 2C The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is

located is likely to grow by more than 5%.Yes No

C The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services willincrease by more than 5% per year as a result of this project.

Yes No

C Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Yes No

C Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Yes No

1Small to Moderate

Impact

2Potential Large

Impact

3Can Impact be Mitigated

by Project Change

86

C Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areasof historic importance to the community.

Yes No

C Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g.schools, police and fire, etc.)

Yes No

C Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Yes No

C Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. Yes NoC Other impacts

Yes No

20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverseenvironment impacts?

x NO YES

If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact orIf you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3

87

Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS

Responsibility of Lead Agency

Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated.

InstructionsDiscuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:1. Briefly describe the impact.2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s).3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.

To answer the question of importance, consider:! The probability of the impact occurring! The duration of the impact! Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value! Whether the impact can or will be controlled! The regional consequence of the impact! Its potential divergence from local needs and goals! Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact.

88

12-12-79 (3/99)-9c SEQRState Environmental Quality Review

NEGATIVE DECLARATIONNotice of Determination of Non-Significance

Identifying #

Date

This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8(State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law.

The NYS Department of Environmental Conservation as lead agency, has determined that theproposed action described below will not have a significant environmental impact and a DraftEnvironmental Impact Statement will not be prepared.

Name of Action:

SEQR Status: Type 1 x Unlisted

Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes No

Description of Action:The Salmon River Falls Unique Area Unit Management Plan (UMP) sets forth the proposed goals,

objectives, management actions and associated costs for 112 acres of state managed land in thetown of Orwell, Oswego County. The plan details all proposed management activities for a ten yearperiod. A review and update will take place at the end of the tenth year. Public input has been soughtand full consideration of this input has been given in the development of the final UMP.

General management activities planned for the Unit include: Improving two existing hiking trails,constructing two new hiking trails, constructing a viewing area below the Falls, maintain the Falls Trailto ADA standards, monitor threatened plant species for population fluctuations, and monitor iceclimbing activities through a registration system.

Location: (Include street address and the name of the municipality/county. A location map ofappropriate scale is also recommended.)Falls Road, Town of Orwell, Oswego County

SEQR NEGATIVE DECLARATION

89

Reasons Supporting This Determination:(See 617.7(a)-(c) for requirements of this determination; see 617.7(d) for Conditioned NegativeDeclaration)

The Salmon River Falls Unique Area plan proposes, for the first time, stewardship managementactions with an emphasis on protecting the areas natural resources.

None of the proposed management actions will cause adverse environmental impacts to the site.Rather, the proposed management actions will protect and maintain the areas ecological andaesthetic uniqueness while allowing for recreational opportunities to exist. The surrounding forest willbe left to develop into a old growth forest with no major activities occurring except the development offoot trails. A restricted area has been delineated to provide a safety buffer for recreational users andalso help to protect two threatened plant species and their habitat.

No change in existing land use will occur during the implementation of this plan. Activities planned forthis Unit will be covered by the following Generic Environmental Impact Statements (GEIS): Plan andFinal Plan GEIS for Conserving Open in New York State, and the DEC Region 7 Recreation MasterPlan for State Forests. If, after the final approval of the plan, activities are added to the plan to providebetter management of the Unit and are not covered under this Negative Declaration or cited under theGeneric Environmental Impact Statements, the Department will undertake a site specificenvironmental review.

If Conditioned Negative Declaration, provide on attachment the specific mitigation measuresimposed, and identify comment period (not less than 30 days from date of publication in theENB)

For Further Information:

Contact Person: Daniel J. SawchuckAddress: 2133 County Route 22, Altmar, NY 13302Telephone Number: (315) 298-7467

For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a Copy of this Notice is sent to:

Appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Conservation

Chief Executive Officer, Town/City/Village of

Other involved agencies (if any)

Applicant (if any)

Environmental Notice Bulletin - NYS DEC - 625 Broadway - Albany, NY 12233-1750 (Type One Action Only)

90

References

Andrle, R. F. and J. R. Carroll. The Atlas of Breeding Birds in N.Y. State. Cornell UniversityPress, Ithaca, NY, 1988.

Anonymous. Checklist of the Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals of New York State,Including Their Protective Status. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,Misc. Pub., 1987.

Chambers, R. E. Integrating Timber and Wildlife Management Handbook. SUNY College ofEnvironmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY, 1983. Clark, George Tisdale. Historical Sketch of Oswego, pp. 89-96 in Tenth Publication of theOswego Historical Society. Palladium-Times, Inc., Oswego, NY, 1946.

Cox, Dr. Donald D., ed. Natural Areas of Oswego County, Rice Creek Field Station, SpecialPublication No. 2. State University of New York College at Oswego, Oswego, NY, 1987.

Dawson, Dr. Chad P. Salmon River Corridor Greenway Protection and Development ConceptPlan, 29 pp. 1994.

Depinto, Joseph V. and Peter Dentice. Acid Precipitation and the Salmon River System, TugHill, New York. Clarkson College of Technology, Potsdam, NY, 1977.

Draft Handbook for State Forests Unit Management Planning. New York State Department ofEnvironmental Conservation, Albany, NY, 1989.

Little, E. L. Checklist of United States Trees (Native and Naturalized). USDA Forest ServiceAgricultural Handbook Number 541, 1979.

Martin. “Orwell Remembered.” 1984.

McKenna, Jim. Personal communication. USGS, Tunison Lab, Cortland, NY, 2001.

Murphy, Steve. Personal communication. Brascan Power Corporation, Syracuse, NY, 2002.

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation. A Comprehensive Land Management Program for theSalmon River Properties. Syracuse, NY, 1992.

91

Reschke, Carol. Ecological Communities of New York State. New York Natural HeritageProgram, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Latham, NY, 1990.

Rapparlie, D. F., et al. Soil Survey of Oswego County, New York. USDA in Association withCornell Agriculture Experiment Station, Ithaca, NY, 1981.

Salmon River Greenway Committee. Salmon River Corridor 1995 Citizen Survey Results. 1996.

United States of America Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. License Agreement withNiagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Project No. 11408-000. Issued February 21, 1996.