SALINITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF BEAN.pdf

  • Upload
    mekaek

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/23/2019 SALINITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF BEAN.pdf

    1/8

    ORIGINAL PAPER

    749Volume 9 (2008) No. 4 (749-756)

    SALINITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF BEAN

    (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)

    (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)Miroslava Kaymakanova, Nevena Stoeva*, Tsvetana Mincheva

    *Agricultural University, 12, Mendeleev Str, 4000 Plovdiv Bulgaria, e-mail: [email protected]

    Manuscript received: March 18 2008; Reviewed: July 9 2008; Accepted for publication: February 11 200

    ABSTRACT

    T e e ect o sa t stress n t e p ys o og ca react on n young ean p ants was stu e . T e p ants were grown n pots

    as hydroponic cultures in half-strength Hoagland nutrient solution under controlled conditions in a climatic room. The

    plants were treated for 7 days with NaCl and Na SO (concentration 100 mM),starting at the appearance of the first

    trifoliate leaf unfolded. The salts were added to the nutrient solution.It was esta s e t at t e equ mo ar concentrat ons o ot sa t types cause stress n t e young ean p ants,

    w c oun express on n t e suppress on o growt , p otosynt es s act v ty an cause c anges n stomata status

    (conductivity, number and size). The transpiration and the cell water potential in salt-treated plants were reduced. The

    MDA level in root and shoot, and the proline content was increased.

    Key words: bean, salinity, salt stress, growth, leaf-gas exchange, water potential, stomata number and size.

    .

    .

    NaC Na SO 100 mM ,. .

    ,

    , ,

    , .

    .

    , .

    : , , , , , .

  • 7/23/2019 SALINITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF BEAN.pdf

    2/8

    50ournal of Central European Agriculture Vol 9 (2008) No 4

    iroslava Kaymakanova, Nevena Stoeva, Tsvetana Mincheva

    INTRODUCTION

    he salinity of soil is a widespread environmental problem

    an mportant actor n m t ng agr cu tura pro uct v ty.

    Sa n ty a ects p ants t roug osmot c e ects, on-

    spec c e ects an ox at ve stress 19 . T e g sa n ty

    evels of soil and irrigation water are known to affect

    any physiological and metabolic processes, leading to

    cell growth reduction [8]. The effect of excess salinity

    ar e y ecrease t e growt an transp rat on rates

    20 , p otosynt es s an p gment contents 24,25 . H g

    exogenous salt concentrations affect seed germination,

    water deficit, cause ion imbalance of the cellular ions

    esulting in ion toxicity and osmotic stress [14, 15].

    e e ect o sa n ty stress on p otosynt et c rate an

    water use e c ency was c ose y re ate to ea anatom ca

    features. The reduction of mesophyl conductance was

    associated with leaf thickness and smaller intercellular

    spaces in the mesophyl of salt-stressed leaves, whichay ave ma e t e part towar s t e s tes o CO xat on

    ore cu t 23 .

    Osmotic effects are due to salt-induced decrease in the

    soil water potential [13]. Salt stress induces cellular

    accumulation of damaging active oxygen species (ROS).

    ROS are g y react ve an tox c to p ants an can ea

    o ce eat y caus ng amage to prote ns, mem rane

    ipids [15], and nucleic acids [21].

    Saline environments are generally correlated with

    c anges n p ant p meta o sm 8 . L p perox at on

    as een assoc ate w t amages provo e y a var ety

    o env ronmenta s tresses. L p perox at on, n uce yfree radicals, is also important in membrane deterioration

    8, 11, 15, 17 .

    arge num er o p ants spec es accumu ate pro ne

    (Pro) in response to salinity stress and that accumulation

    may p ay a ro e n com at ng sa n ty stress 2, 18,

    19 . However, ata o not a ways n cate a pos t ve

    corre at on etween t e osmo yte accumu at on an

    adaptation to stress [16].

    In the present work, the effects of salt treatment on lipidperox at on, water potent a an water content o ean

    were stu e . Lea gas-exc ange an ea anatomy were

    a so ana yze .

    MATERIAL AND METHODS

    Bean see s P aseo us vu gar s L., , cu t var G na,

    were sur ace-ster ze w t a 0.5% NaOCL so um

    ypoc or te so ut on or 1 m n an t en was e

    thoroughly in sterilized water. The seeds were germinated

    at dark at 26 C in vermiculite media. After that, they

    ere transferred in pots filled by half-strength Hoagland

    utr ent so ut on an grown n a growt c am er un er

    contro e env ronmenta con t ons. T e con t ons,

    aintained during the experiments, were the following:

    ight duration 14 hours, light intensity (PAR) 250 mol

    s- temperature 22 2 and relative air humidity

    60 5%. At t e appearance o t e rst tr o ate ea , an

    exper menta es gn w t t ree treatments was arrange

    orevery cu t var:

    control plants, supplied by of Hoagland solution;

    p ants, supp e y o Hoag an so ut on enr c e w t

    100 mM NaC ;

    plants, supplied by of Hoagland solution enriched with

    100 mM Na SO ;

    e treatment o p ants w t sa ts cont nue or 7 ays.

    L p perox at on was measure as t e amount

    Table 1. Effect of salinity on the leaf gas-exchange parameters in bean plants.

    Young bean plants are subjected to salt stress by adding 100 mM of NaCl and Na2SO4 to the Hoagland nutrient

    solution. PN Net photosynthetic rate [mol (CO2)m-2 s-1]; E Transpiration rate [mmol (H2O) m

    -2s

    -1]; gs

    stomata conductance [mol m-2s-1]; PN/E ratio water use efficiency ; and LA leaf aria (cm2); values are mean

    SE. *

  • 7/23/2019 SALINITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF BEAN.pdf

    3/8

    SALINITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)

    751J. Cent. Eur. Agric. (2008) 9:4, 749-756

    o t o ar tur c ac react ve su stance TBARS

    eterm ne y t e t o ar tur c ac TBA react on

    as described by Heath and Packer (1968) [10]. The leaf

    tissues were homogenized in 0.1% (w/v) tricholoacetic

    ac TCA . T e omogenate was centr uge at 10,000

    g or 20 m n. To m o t e resu t ng supernatant, 4 m o

    TCA 20% conta n ng 0.5 w v o TBA were a e . T e

    m xture was eate at 95 0C or 30 m n an t en coo en ce o owe y centr ugat on at 10,000 g or 15 m n.

    The absorbance was measured at 532 nm and corrected

    for 600 nm. The concentration of TBARS was calculated

    using an extinction coefficient of 155 mM

    -1

    cm

    -1

    .For proline estimation the primary leaves (1 g) were

    omogen ze w t 3% aqueous su osa cy c ac an

    centr uge at 3,000 g or 10 m n. Pro ne rom t e

    supernatant was eterm ne ca or metr ca y w t to uo ,

    accordance the method of Bates et al. (1973) [3].

    The leaf gas exchange elements were determined

    y means o a porta e n rare gas ana yzer LCA-4

    Ana yt ca Deve opment Company Lt ., H es on,

    England) equipped with a PLCB-4 chamber.

    Relative water content (RWC) was calculated according

    to Morgan 1986 22 . W o e ea or ea s s 1.5 cm

    were we g e mme ate y a ter co ect on or punc ngres we g t, FM an p ace n a Petr s conta n ng

    wet filter paper and kept at 4oC in the dark. After 24 h,

    the turgor weight (TW) was obtained. For the dry weight

    (DM), leaf disks were oven-dried for 24 h at 80-90 C and

    we g e .

    T e water potent a n eaves was measure w t a

    pressure chamber (ELE-International, England).

    The leaf area (electronic area meter NEO-3, TU-

    So a was measure . T e stomata ce s were measure

    by means of a bolt eye-lens - micrometer 15x and an

    objective 15x, at magnification 600x. The stomata cells

    p otograp s were ta en y means o an eye- ens 16x an

    an o ect ve 40x, at magn cat on 640x.

    Statistical analysis

    A ana yses were one n ve rep cat ons. T e s own

    resu ts are mean va ues SE. S gn cant erences

    between control and each treatment was determined by

    the Students t criterion.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    T e e ect o two sa t stresses on p otosynt es s s s own

    in Table 1. The gdecreased as a result of submitting to

    NaCl or Na SO but the degree of inhibition varied

    greatly between the salt sources. Na SO decreased it

    to a greater extent 62 % ecrease t an NaC 50 %

    n t on . A s gn cant n t on n Pn y eaves

    su ecte to ot sa t treatments was o serve , troug

    there was no striking difference in the magnitude of

    inhibition between the salinity source (62% decrease by

    NaCl and 66 % by Na SO ).

    Accor ng to Tezara 26 , ot water an sa n ty stress

    markedly inhibited Pn and g although the effect of

    salinity on these variables was milder than water deficit.

    T e resu ts n t e same ta e n cate as we t at was

    n te to e esser egree n compar son to Pn 58

    ecrease y NaC an 65 % y Na SO , an once

    more, the Na SO inhibiting effect was more strongly

    expressed.

    T e water use e c ency P E was mo e as a resu t

    o t e reporte c anges n P an E. In t e eaves o

    eans, su ecte to 100 mM NaC an Na SO,t e P E

    were reduced to 27-32% compared to that in the control

    Table 2. Anatomical characteristics of leaves of Bean exposed for 7 days to 100 mM NaCL and Na2SO4;

    values are mean SE.

    2. 100 mM

    NaCL Na2SO4.). SE.

    Parameters Control 100 mM NaCL 100 mM Na2SO4Upper epidermis

    Number of stomata 507,6 14,37 782,8 16,49 722,8 13,17

    Stomata lenght(m) 22,97 0,32 15,87 0,58 20,76 0,74

    Stomata width (m) 18,38 0,13 11,77 0,6 15,34 0,48

    Lower epidermis

    Number of stomata 75,2 4,22 106,8 5,59 182,8 9,25

    Damaged 0 145.28.26 29.66.39

    Stomata lenght (m) 27,85 0,49 21,43 0,38 24,63 0,53

    Stomata width (m) 19,6 0,25 18,2 0,42 17,79 0,43

  • 7/23/2019 SALINITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF BEAN.pdf

    4/8

    52ournal of Central European Agriculture Vol 9 (2008) No 4

    iroslava Kaymakanova, Nevena Stoeva, Tsvetana Mincheva

    F gure 1. T e e ect o sa n ty on stomata requency.

    1.

    Control 100 mM NaCl 100 mM Na2SO4

    Upperepidermis

    Lowerep

    idermis

    Table 3. Effect of salinity on the parameters of water exchange in bean plants.

    Young bean plants are subjected to salt stress by adding 100 mM of NaCl and Na2SO4 to the Hoagland nutrientsolution. WD - Water deficit ( %), RWC - Relative water content (%), - Water potential [-MPa] and P

    prline content ( g g-1FM). Values are mean SE. *

  • 7/23/2019 SALINITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF BEAN.pdf

    5/8

    SALINITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)

    753J. Cent. Eur. Agric. (2008) 9:4, 749-756

    mM NaCl and Na SOcaused a increase in the stomata

    requency at a out 42% re ate to t e contro p ants

    F gure 1 . T e ncrease stomata requency at g er

    sa n ty agrees w t t e o servat ons n eans 30 . T s

    could be explained ith the dwindlingof the leaf cells as

    a result of the xeromorphic structure of the salt-treatedplants. The results show that the stomata size (length and

    w t n sa t-treate p ants were re uce too.

    Some aut ors ave cons ere t e re uct on n ce s ze

    under water stress to be drought adaptation mechanism

    [23]. According to Culter et al., [6] the reduction in sell

    size appears to be a major response of cells to water

    e c ency t at may e cause e t er y roug t or sa n ty

    stress. Car m et a ., 5 con rme , as we , t e ecrease

    of the stomata size in salt-treated plants. Water status is

    highly sensitive to salinity and therefore is dominant in

    determining the plant responses to stress [26].

    Ta e 3 s ows t e c anges n RWC an water potent a nyoung ean p ants un er var ous sa n ty stresses. A ter 7

    days of treatment the osmotic potential of leaves decreased

    under saline conditions 98 % (100 mM NaCL) and 138

    % (100 mM Na SO ). Generally, decreased lowerin the

    secon sa t. T e treatment o p ants w t Na SO causes

    more cons era e c anges w t respect an to RWC

    14 % lower than the non-treated plants.Dehidratation

    symptoms were more evident in the 100 mM Na SO

    due to the fact that probably this salt has higher sodium

    concentrat ons 2 Na w c ncrease ce u ar water

    oss. T e ecrease o RWC an ea s to an ncrease o

    t e pro ne content 290 % n case o 100 mM Na SO

    treatment. The considerable decrease of RWC and

    probably is a result of the structural-functional changes,

    Figure 2. Effect of salinity on lipid peroxidation [LP-[nmol (MDA) g-1 (FM)] in shoots and roots in bean plants.

    1. LP- nmo MDA g-1 FM

    .

    12,5

    14,73

    19,8

    19,27

    29,9

    35,65

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    Control

    NaCl

    Na2SO4

    Variants

    nmol MDA g-1 FM

    LP shoot LP root

    ensuring the plants adaptation to the salt-treatment. In

    suc cases, a process o osmot c se -a ustment occurs

    n t e p ant ce s, recte towar s t e preservat on o t e

    water a ance y means o accumu at on o osmot ca y

    active solutes [29], and that is a mechanism reported to

    operate in plants in response to salt stress [27]. The resultsfrom our study with respect to the considerable praline

    ncrease n ean eaves coor nate we w t t e resu ts

    comcern ng t e c anges n t e ot er two parameters

    - RWC and . According toCarimi et al., [5] proline is

    accumulated in the cytoplasm and its organelles in order

    to maintain photosynthesis.

    Perox at on o mem rane p s s an n cat on

    o mem rane amage an ea age un er sa t stress

    conditions. Bean plants were affected by both organs by

    means of lipid peroxidation, but in the roots the MDA

    content was greater. The results in Figure 2 show as well,

    t at t e MDA ncrease more s gn cant y n t e seconsa t 100 mM Na SO 155 % n s oots an 184 % n

    roots . L p perox at on s o ten use as an n cator

    of salt-induced oxidative stress in sells, by the increase

    in MDA level [8].

    On the basis of the results obtained during the research,

    the following conclusion can be drawn:

    T e app e oses o ot sa t types cause stress n

    t e young ean p ants, w c oun express on n t e

    suppress on o p otosynt es s act v ty an cause

    changes in stomata status (conductivity, number and size),

    which is a result of the disturbed osmotic processes andthe toxic effect of Cl , SO -and Na . The transpiration

    an t e ce water potent a n sa t-treate p ants were

  • 7/23/2019 SALINITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF BEAN.pdf

    6/8

    54ournal of Central European Agriculture Vol 9 (2008) No 4

    iroslava Kaymakanova, Nevena Stoeva, Tsvetana Mincheva

    educed and this tendency was more strongly expressed

    n t e case o t e su p ate treatment. T e pro ne an

    MDA content was ncrease s gn cant y.

    ith respect to all indexes, a stronger toxic effect of

    Na SO compared to that of NaCl, was registered, a fact

    probably due to the higher concentration of Na in theean p ants t ssues.

    EFERENCES

    [1]. Ashraf, M., Haris, P.J,. Pontential biochemical

    ndicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Sci.,

    2004 , 166, 3-16.

    [2]. Barhoumi, Z., Djebali W., Chaibi W., Abdelly

    Ch. Smaoui A., Salt impact on photosynthesis and

    ultrastructure of Aelurous littoralis. J Plant Res, (2007),

    120: 529-537.

    [3]. Bates, L.S., Walden, R.P.,. Tears, I.D., Rapidermination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant

    Soil , (1973), 39, 205-208.

    4 . Brugno , E., Lauter , M., E ect o sa n ty on

    stomata conductance, photosynthetic capacity, and carbon

    sotope discrimination of salt-tolerant (Gossypium

    irsufum L.) and salt-sensitive (Phaseolus vulgaris L) C-

    3 non o op ytes. P ant P ys o . 1991 , 95: 628635.

    [5]. Carimi G.,Ghorbanli,M.,Heidari., H., Nejad,

    R., Assareh, M., The effects of NaCl on growth, water

    elations, osmolytes and ion content in Kochia prostrate.

    B o . P antarum, 2005 49: 2 : 301-304.

    [6]. Culter, J., Radins D., Loomis, R.,. The importance

    of cell size in the water relations of plants. Phisiol. Plant.

    (1977), 40,255-260.

    7 . E a ou S., Hernan ez, J., A e y, C., G r r,

    R., Luman, F., Effects of salt on lipid peroxidation and

    antioxidant enzyme activities of Catharanthus roseus

    suspens on ce . P ant Sc ence 2004 168, 607-613.

    [8]. Gama P.B., Inanaga, S., Tanaka, K., Nakazawa,

    R., . Physiological response of common bean (Phaseolus

    ulg. L.) seedlings to salinity stress, African J. of

    B otec no ogy, 2007 vo .6 2 , 79-88.

    [9]. Demiral, T.,Turkan, I., Comperative lipidperoxidation, antioxidant defense systems and proline

    content in roots of two rice cultivars differing in salt

    o erance, Env. Exp. Bot., 2005 53,247-257.

    [10]. Heath, R., Packer, L.,. Photoperoxidation in

    solated chloroplasts. I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of

    fatty acid peroxidation. - Arch. Biochem. Biophys.,

    1968 , 125: 189-198,.

    [11]. Hernandez, J.A., Mullineaux , P., Sevilla, F.,

    olerance of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to long term stress is

    associated with induction of antioxidant defences, Plant

    Ce Env ron., 2000 23,853-862.

    [12]. Hernandez, J.A., Almansa, M.S.,. Short-term

    effects of salt stress on antioxidant systems and leaf

    water relations of pea plants. Physiol. Plant. (2002), 115,

    251-256.

    [13]. Josefa, M. N., Gariddo, C., Martinez, V.,

    Carvajal, M.,. Water relations and xylem transport of

    nutrients in pepper plants grown under two different salt

    stress reg mes, P ant Growt Regu ., 2003 , 41, 237-

    245.

    [14]. Khan, M.H., Singha, S. Panda, S K., Changes

    in antioxidant levels in Oriza sativa L. roots subjected to

    NaC -sa n ty stress. Acta P ysyo P ant , 2002 , 24,145-

    148.

    [15]. Khan, M.H., Panda, S.K., Alterations in root

    lipid peroxidation and antioxidative responses in two ricecu t vars un er naC -sa n ty stress. Acta P ysyo P ant,

    2008 , 30,91-89.

    [16]. Lutts, S., Kinet, J.M., Bouharmont, J., Effects

    of salt stress on growth, mineral nutrition and proline

    accumu at on n re at on to osmot c a ustment n r ce

    or za sat va cu t vars er ng n sa n ty res stance.

    Plant Growth Regul., (1996), 19, 207-218.

    [17]. Mandhania, S., Madan, S., Sawhney, V.,

    Ant ox ant e ense mec an sm un er sa t stress n

    w eat see ngs, B o . P ant, 2006 , 227,227-231.

    [18]. Mansour, M. M. F., Nitrogen containing

    compoun s an a aptat on o p ants to sa n ty stress,B o . P ant., 2000 , 43,491-500.

    [19]. Mansour, M.M.,. Salama, F.Z., Ali, M., Hadid,

    A., Cell and plant responses to NaCl in Zea Mays L.

    cu t vars er ng n sa t to erance, Gen. App . P ant

    P ys o ., 2005 , 31 1-2 , 29-41.

    [20]. Massai R., Remorini, D., Tattini, M.,Gas

    exchange, water relations and osmotic adjustment in two

    sc on rootstoc com nat ons o Prunus un er var ous

    sa n ty concentrat ons. P ant an so , 2004 , 259, 153-

    169.

    [21]. Mittler, R.,. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and

    stress to erance, Tren s P ant Sc ., 2002 , 7, 405-410.

    [22]. Morgan JE ,1986. The effect on the N nutrition

    on the warer relations and gas exchange characteristics of

    wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Plant Physiol., 19, 67-76.

    23 . Omam E.N.,. Responses o Amarant to sa n ty

    stress. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements

    for the degree Ph.D. Horticultural. University of Pretoria,

    South African, (2005), p 112.

    24 . Renau t S., Croser,C., .Fran n, J., Zw aze ,

  • 7/23/2019 SALINITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF BEAN.pdf

    7/8

    SALINITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)

    755J. Cent. Eur. Agric. (2008) 9:4, 749-756

    J., Effects of NaCl and Na SO on red-osier dogwood

    Cornus sto on era M c x see ngs,P ant an So ,

    2001 , 233: 261-268.

    25]. Stoeva N., Kaymakanova, M., Effect of s

    a t stress on t e growt an p otosynt es s rate o ean

    p ants P aseo us vu g. L. In: Boo o procee ngs o

    2 dInternational conference of Journal Central Europiam

    Agriciltural, Nitra (2007),181-187.

    26 . Step en, P., K o us, G., Water re at ons an

    p otosynt es n Cucum s sat vus L. eaves un er sa t

    stress, Biologia Plantarum, (2006),50 (40),610-616 .

    27 . Tezara W., D.Mart nez, E. Reng o, A. Herrera,.

    P otosynt et c Responses o t e Trop ca Sp ny S ru

    Luc um no osum So anaceae to Droug t, So sa n ty

    and Saline Spray, Annals of Botany, (2003), 92: 757-

    65.

    29 . Tourneux, C., Pe t er, G., E ect o water e c t

    on the photosynthetic oxygen exchange measured using

    O and mass spectrometry in Solanum tuberosum leaf

    disks, Planta, (1995)195: 570-577.

    29 .Turner NC., Jones, M., Turgor ma ntenance y

    osmotic adjustment: a review and evaluation. In: Turner

    N., Kramer P. eds. Adaptation of plants to water and

    high temperature stress. New York: John Wiley & Sons,

    1980 , 87-103.

    30]. Wignarajah K., Jennings, DH., Handley JF.,

    The effect of salinity on growth of Pfaseolus vulgaris L.

    Anatomical Changes in the first trifoliate leaf. Ann Bot

    39: 1029-1038.

  • 7/23/2019 SALINITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF BEAN.pdf

    8/8