9
Sahel JPC Value Chain Analysis: Summary of Initial Findings and Recommendations for Project Design 1 October 2012

Sahel JPC Value Chain Analysis: Summary of Initial Findings and Recommendations for Project Design 1 October 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Sahel JPC Value Chain Analysis: Summary of Initial Findings and Recommendations for Project Design 1 October 2012

Sahel JPC Value Chain Analysis:Summary of Initial Findings and Recommendations

for Project Design

1October 2012

Page 2: Sahel JPC Value Chain Analysis: Summary of Initial Findings and Recommendations for Project Design 1 October 2012

2

Current Context and TrendsPopulation growth pressures are resulting in:

• movement to drier areas• reductions in landholdings • transfer of land/assets to better-off • greater inequality

Agricultural production under stress:• target area is millet deficit• poor purchase 60% of grain consumed• crop production is a marginal source of food for poor

Vulnerable populations are not subsistence but rather are:• Linked to markets, rely on cash for food – net buyers of grain• Rely on better-off farmers for employment and cash

Characteristics of Poor HouseholdsKey livelihoods: crop production, small livestock rearing, paid work and firewood salesMain sources of income: paid work, cowpeas and firewood sales main sources Key productive assets: labor for hire, cultivate land (<1-2 ha), few ruminants and poultry

Background & Trends

Page 3: Sahel JPC Value Chain Analysis: Summary of Initial Findings and Recommendations for Project Design 1 October 2012

3

Rainfed Agricultural Systems Agropastoral Systems

Transhumant-Nomadic-Pastoral

Systems

More rainfall Less rainfall

Vegetables: Onion,

Tomato, Pepper,

Watermelon

Irrigated and Lowland Systems

Phase I: Current Systems

Minor Commodities: Okra, Hibiscus,

Groundnut, Sesame, NTFP

Irrigated Crops (includes onions)

Minor Commodities: Okra, Hibiscus,

Groundnut, Sesame, NTFP

Irrigated Crops (includes onions)

Maize/Sorghum/

Rice

Page 4: Sahel JPC Value Chain Analysis: Summary of Initial Findings and Recommendations for Project Design 1 October 2012

4

Selecting Criteria

Considerations Criteria Chosen

6. Contribution to food security and nutrition6. Contribution to food security and nutrition

2. Policy/Business enabling environment2. Policy/Business enabling environment

A. Growth potential

B. Constraints to growth

C. Impact potential

1. Competitiveness of value chain1. Competitiveness of value chain

3. Participation3. Participation

4. Potential for cash4. Potential for cash

5. Potential for employment5. Potential for employment

7. Contribution to environmental sustainability7. Contribution to environmental sustainability

Page 5: Sahel JPC Value Chain Analysis: Summary of Initial Findings and Recommendations for Project Design 1 October 2012

5

Phase II: Analyzing Individual Value Chains

Cowpea

Small Ruminants

Poultry

Onions

Millet

Value Chain

Competitiveness of value chain Participation Potential for

cashEmployment potential

Contribution to food security and nutrition

Policy/Business enabling environment

Low Medium High

Priority criteria chosen to select value chains:

Contribution to environmental sustainability

Page 6: Sahel JPC Value Chain Analysis: Summary of Initial Findings and Recommendations for Project Design 1 October 2012

6

Methodology for Applying a Systemic Lens to VC Selection

Phase II: Value chain criteriaPhase I: Current system considerations

• Millet-cowpea-livestock are the core elements in 3 of 4 representative agricultural systems

• Livestock assets are an important source of income but risk catastrophic losses in severe drought

• Irrigated and lowland systems are focused on maize, rice and high value fruit and vegetables, such as onions

• The target zone is grain deficit, sourcing additional grain from Nigeria, which also provides a vibrant market for livestock and cowpea

• Niger onion yields are the highest in West Africa and Galmi onions are famous across the region

Phase III: Recommendations

• All VCs have similar/same issues with BEE, poor storage, unstructured trade and weak VC organization

• Cowpeas, small ruminants and onions have the most potential to grow and provide income

• Small ruminants and onions have some potential to provide employment

• Millet is dominated by the very poor, it offers little growth potential, but it does provide some local employment

• Given strong demand growth for poultry and high participation by women, this VC has potential but will require development

Page 7: Sahel JPC Value Chain Analysis: Summary of Initial Findings and Recommendations for Project Design 1 October 2012

7

Phase III: Recommendations

Phase II: Value chain criteria

Phase I: Current system considerations

Phase III: Recommendations

1. Value chain/system selection: Promote poultry, small ruminant, cowpea, and onion VCs, which benefit from growing markets and favor participation of women and youth, to the extent that they fit within the agricultural systems described in Phase I:For irrigated/lowland system: Promote value chains that can increase productivity and reduce the risk of crop failureFor millet/cowpea rainfed and agropastoral systems, promote water harvesting to reduce risk of crop failureFor most systems, promote livestock accessible to the poorStrengthen social assets, particularly the ability of well-off households to provide the poor with employment and food

2. Across value chains, improve their functioning by:reducing transaction costs ensuring incentives to participate, invest and upgrade ensuring benefits to all participants, especially the poor

3. Across value chains: address common systemic constraints

4. Environmental Sustainability: Promote natural regeneration of woodlands to provide fuelwood and charcoal, an important source of income for the poor

Page 8: Sahel JPC Value Chain Analysis: Summary of Initial Findings and Recommendations for Project Design 1 October 2012

8

• Use a value chain approach, includes farm-to-market linkages, access to resources to enable upgrading & ability of the poor to capture benefits

• Use a push-pull approach (pathways out of poverty + value chain development) to ensure inclusion of the poor

• Take a systems approach that recognizes the inter-connections among farming, market and ecological systems and avoids singular commodity or simplistic technical fixes

• Address systemic constraints that could improve multiple value chains

• Don’t ignore the better-off farmers – key to the security of vulnerable HHs

• Include regional markets – they are critical even to the most vulnerable

• Ensure Government does not crowd out private sector upon which cash and employment generation depend

• Use facilitation approaches to change behavior and ensure sustainability

• Build flexibility into project design that allows for learning and adapting, working with contract officer

• Build in credible evaluations to ensure evidence-based learning

• Ensure a shift in programming that integrates humanitarian and development interventions, offering TA on value chain and EG approaches

Takeaways for Project Design

Page 9: Sahel JPC Value Chain Analysis: Summary of Initial Findings and Recommendations for Project Design 1 October 2012

9

Questions

Questions?