Safety Workshop Sept 2010

7/28/2019 Safety Workshop Sept 2010

1/26

Date: 11-09-2010


2/26

Safety Workshop 12/09/2010

Objectives of Today :

1 Overall to Reinforce MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT to safety

2 Why is safety important

look at world events3 Company History

4 Year safety plan

4.1 S-Plans Objectives Targets KPI4.2 SPlan Yearly Safety Checklist

5 Legal Compliance

6 Risk


3/26

WORLDS BIGGEST MANAGEMENT DISASTER

What has been the Worlds Biggest MANAGEMENT DISASTERthis year .


4/26

BP Gulf Disaster

Gulf Oil Spill

11 people killed

Massive environmental disaster

Huge economic crisis for small business in areaWildlife effected for ever

Legislation all further exploration stopped

COO loses job

Obama ???Cost to date 120 Billion US $ estimated

Destroyed the image of BP logo is green


5/26

BP Press conference 09/10/2010

No single factorcaused the Macondowell tragedy. Rather, a sequence of

failures involving a number of different

parties led to the explosion and fire which

killed 11 people and caused widespread

pollution in the Gulf of Mexico earlier this

year.

A report released by BP today concludes

that decisions made by multiple

companies and work teams contributed to

the accident which it says arose from a

complex and interlinked series of

mechanical failures, human judgments,

engineering design, operational

implementation and team interfaces.


6/26

Accident Chain

We speak about the accident or safety chain and an accident/incident is always a set of events put together


7/26

Accident

The Accident Swiss Cheese Model.Adapted from James Reason, Human Error, 1990

The Unsafe Act

or Active Failure

Fallible

Decisions Design Material &

ILS Deficiencies

Line

Management

Deficiencies

Physical &

Psychological

Precursors

InadequateDefences


8/26

ACCIDENTS INCIDENTS ARE CAUSED

It is other something we have done

OrIt is something we have not done

THAT IS WE AS MANAGERS


9/26

Dangerous Situation


10/26

Would you put somebody to work in a siyuation like this


11/26

Hierarchy of Controls

SubstitutionEngineering/Isolation

PPE

Best Option

Last Option

You can use a

combination of these

cont ro ls

Administrative

Elimination


12/26

Risk Control = Zero Harm

ELIMINATION

The hazard is removed altogether.

SUBSTITUTION

Replace the hazardous system or processwith one that presents a lower risk.

ENGINEERING CONTROLS

Structural change to the working

environment or work process that forms anadditional protective barrier between thehazard and the employee.

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS

Reduce exposure to hazards throughprocedure, Instructions, training andcompetency.

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE)

Worn by exposed employees to provide alast line of Defence should other controlsprove ineffective or used Together withother control measures. The protectionoffered by PPE relies on the correctselection, fitting, Maintenance and use.


13/26

Correct Tools


14/26

Correct Briefing


15/26

Correct Design


16/26

Management has happy safe workers


17/26

0.00

3.00

6.00

9.00

12.00

15.00

Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10

Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10May-10

Jun-10

LTI Freq. Rate 2.43 2.72 2.67 2.60 2.86 2.83 2.49 2.45 2.13 2.18 2.50 2.18

MTI Freq. Rate 3.82 4.08 3.34 3.25 2.23 4.09 4.04 3.99 3.95 3.75 3.76 3.43

SAFETYSTATISTICS ( IRL- 12 Month Rolling )


18/26

Break the Accident Chain use the tools at your disposal

INDUCTION

TRAIN

STANDARD

PROCEDURE

STANDARDS

SAFETY

MEETING

SPECIAL

INSTRUCTION

DESIGN

SIGNAGE


19/26

Safety System

What are the tools at your disposal ?

Safety System

Result ZERO HARM everybody goes home safely everday


20/26

0.00

3.00

6.00

9.00

12.00

15.00



LTI Freq. Rate 2.48 2.94 2.81 2.67 3.08 2.99 2.42 2.81 2.29 2.33 2.78 2.29

MTI Freq. Rate 6.19 5.88 5.05 4.81 3.08 5.49 5.32 5.16 5.03 4.66 4.63 4.13

SAFETY STATISTICS (MINE- 12 Month Rolling)

SAFETY STATICS


21/26

0.00

3.00

6.00

9.00

12.00

15.00



LTI Freq. Rate 3.83 3.89 3.94 3.95 4.06 4.19 4.34 2.99 3.08 3.31 3.43 3.48

MTI Freq. Rate 1.28 2.59 1.31 1.32 1.35 2.80 2.89 2.99 3.08 3.31 3.43 3.48

SAFETY STATISTICS (PLANT- 12 Month Rolling)


22/26

All Injury Frequency

Rate Lost Time Injuries

Year No of LTI LTI 12 Mths Rolling Contract To Date

Mine Plant Total Mine Plant Total Year Mine Plant Total Mine Plant Total

2007-2008 2.88 2.34 1.98 2 2 4 2007-2008 1.85 3.77 2.88 2.62 3.77 2.88

2008-

2009 1.86 0.57 1.14 6 1 7 2008-2009 2.99 1.25 2.17 3.08 2.65 2.26

2009-

2010 1.28 1.77 1.12 5 2 7 2009-2010 1.90 3.48 2.18 1.94 0.00 1.97

2010-

2011 1.29 0.00 1.07 4 0 4 2010-2011 1.52 0.00 1.56 2.06 4.25 2.08


23/26

2007

2008

2008

2009

2009

2010

IMPROVMENT Target

2010-2011

Fatalities 0 1 0 ---- 0

AIFR 2.88 1.86 1.28 25% 0.96

LTIFR 1.85 2.99 1.90 25% 1.43

MandaysLost

25 250 160 25% 120

Posit ive Indicator

a. P.T.O.Each Underground Block will do 2(two) PTO per week.

Each PTO will be signed off by the Deputy Manager Mines who is responsible for each shaft.

Maintenance and Electrical will do 1(one) per week for their sections.

b. Attain 95% per month of the activities as per yearly Safety Management checklist.

c. On the 30th of each month have no activities overdue by more than 30 days in Safety Log Form


24/26

Biggest challenge

2.5 Injury Analysis

2.5.1 The biggest Causeof accidents/incidents is Struck by 29.82% followed by Caught in between 24.56%.

2.5.2 The Job Category involved with the above is Trammers/Chute Operators 85.71% and Drillers 14.26%.

2.5.3 The Body Part most effected is hand 57.1%.


25/26

Objective for Mosaboni Plant

a. P.T.O.

Crusher and Concentrator to do 1(One) per week.

Electrical Department to do 1(One) per week.

. b. Attain 95% per month of the activities as per yearly Safety Management checklist.

c. On the 30th of each month have no activities overdue by more than 30 days in Safety Log Form

2007

2008

2008

2009

2009

2010

IMPROVMENT Target

2010-2011

Fatalities 1 0 0 --- 0AIFR 2.34 0.57 1.77 25% 1.32

LTIFR 3.77 1.25 3.48 50% 1.74

Mandays

Lost

210 19 7 75% 5


26/26

Safety & Training Department

V. T. Centre-Surda Mine

India Resources Limited

Surda

Feeling Safe, Being Safe

Documents

Safety Workshop Sept 2010