29
Safer Products That Work Cleaners and Degreasers for Auto Repair State/Community Hazardous Material Source Reduction Jane Paulson October 25, 2017

Safer Products That Work - PPRC · Hydrotreated Light Naphtha 64742-49-0 30-60% Xylene 1330-20-7 10-30% Propane 74-98-6 10-30% Methyl Alcohol 67-56-1 7-13% Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 2-8%

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Safer Products That WorkCleaners and Degreasers for Auto Repair

    State/Community Hazardous Material Source Reduction

    Jane PaulsonOctober 25, 2017

  • Minnesota Technical Assistance Program

    • Mission Statement: Strengthening Minnesota businesses by improving efficiency while saving money through energy, water, and waste reduction

    • Based in the University of Minnesota School of Public Health

    • Confidential, free and non-regulatory

    • Staff of 12 scientists and engineers with 30 years assisting business through:

    • Site assessment visits• Intern Program• Company team facilitation• Demonstrations & research projects• Minnesota Materials Exchange• Website, fact sheets & case studies

  • • Most businesses perform degreasing for equipment maintenance or production processes

    • 7,738,000 lb VOC emissions from area sources in MN

    • 5% of Industrial/Commercial VOC emissions

    • Common methods • Aerosol degreasing cleaners

    • Manual parts washers

    Why Industrial Maintenance and Automotive Repair?

  • What is “better”?

    • Does the product work?

    • No Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP’s)

    • Low Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC’s)

    • Low Ozone Generator (lbs.O3/lbs.product)

    • Minimize MN Chemicals of Concern

    • Do a comparison!

    http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/air/air-monitoring-and-reporting/air-emissions-modeling-and-monitoring/air-toxics-emission-inventory/pollutant-categories-for-air-toxics.htmlhttp://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2009/mir2009/mir10.pdfhttp://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/hazardous/topics/toxfreekids/highconcern.html

  • How do I find safer products?

    • TURI – Check out their Cleaner Solutions Database

    • Look for reputable labels:• EPA’s Safer Choice Label

    • Green Electronics Council - EPEAT

    • USDA Organics

    http://www.cleanersolutions.org/http://www2.epa.gov/saferchoice/safer-ingredientshttp://www.epeat.net/

  • Product Comparison – SDS Information•Product A• VOC Content: 100%

    • HAP Content: 34.72%

    • Section 2: Ingredients

    •Product B• VOC Content: ???

    • Specific Gravity: 0.728

    • Section 2: IngredientsHydrotreated Light Naphtha 64742-49-0 30-60%

    Xylene 1330-20-7 10-30%

    Propane 74-98-6 10-30%

    Methyl Alcohol 67-56-1 7-13%

    Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 2-8%

    Toluene 108-88-3

  • Product Comparison - Examine Ingredients• Product A

    • Product BIngredient CAS # Wt %MIR Value Overall MIR ListsAcetone 67-64-1 52% 0.36 0.83 VOC ExemptHeptane-branched, cyclic and linear 426260-76-6 40% 1.47Heptane 142-82-5 5% 1.07

    Carbon Dioxide 64742-52-5 3% 0

    Ingredient CAS # Wt %MIR Value Overall MIR ListsHydrotreated Light Naphtha 64742-49-0 48.28% 1.4** 2.6Xylene 1330-20-7 21% 7.76 HAP, MnCOC-RespiratoryPropane 74-98-6 17% 0.49Methyl Alcohol 67-56-1 9% 0.67 HAP, MnCOC-DevelopmentEthylbenzene 100-41-4 4.62% 3.04 HAP, MnCOC-Cancer, DevelopmentToluene 108-88-3

  • Product Comparison – Summarize

    • Product A

    • VOC Content: 100%

    • HAP Content: 34.72%

    • MIR Value: 2.6 lbs O3/lb

    • Ingredients on HAP, MnCOC lists

    • Product B

    • VOC Content: 45%

    • HAP Content: 0%

    • MIR Value: 0.83 lbs O3/lb

    • Ingredients on VOC Exempt

  • Which products were they?A: 3M High Power

    Brake Cleaner #08880B: Parts Master Low-VOC

    Brake Cleaner #0732

  • • O’Reilly Low VOC Brake Cleaner - 00482• Heptane 50-55%• Toluene 20-25%• Acetone 15-20%• Carbon Dioxide 0-15%

    • O’Reilly Ultra Low VOC Brake Cleaner - 46580• Acetone 80-85%• Heptane 5-10%• Carbon Dioxide 0-15%

    • O’Reilly Non-Chlorinated Brake Cleaner – 72408• Toluene 30-40%• Methanol 30-40%• Acetone 20-30%• Carbon Dioxide 5-15%

  • • Gunk M720• Perchloroethylene

    40-50%• Dichloromethane

    40-50%• Carbon Dioxide

    1-5%

    • Valvoline 6861046• Acetone 86.21%• Xylene 5.12%• Methanol 2.79%• Ethyl Benzene 1.53%• Carbon Dioxide

    5.86%

    • Penray Non-Chlorinated Brake Cleaner - 4620• Xylene 7-13% • Toluene 1-5%• Acetone 30-60%• Heptane 25-70%• Carbon Dioxide 3-7%

    • CRC Brakleen 05089• Perchloroethylene

    90-100%

    • Carbon Dioxide 1-5%

  • Parts Washers• Aqueous parts cleaners can replace

    solvent based parts washers or other cleaning products.

    • City of Minneapolis & MPCA are partnering with Safety-Kleen to offer a cost share program for aqueous-based parts washers• Covers 45% of upfront cost and service

    • Other parts washers we have seen success with include SafeWasher by Cintas, Superclean AP by Cuda and Ozzy Juice by Chemfree.

    Solvent-basedAqueous-based

  • General Structure of Projects• Introduce the project and get agreement from business to

    participate

    • Identify current products and suppliers

    • Assess products

    • Identify potential alternative products

    • Provide samples

    • Test samples

    • If company agrees to make a change, provide a case of product to get them started

  • Round 1: Auto repair and industrial maintenance pilot projects

    • Outreach to MN auto repair and industrial maintenance facilities

    • Assess product use at industrial/automotive businesses

    • Identified safer alternatives• Companies trialed grant purchased sample

    of new product• MnTAP provided hands-on technical

    support• 23 facilities conducted trials/12

    implemented change• 3,030 lbs VOC, 760 lbs HAP, 650 solid waste,

    $7,470 savingsEPA SRA Grant Project X9-00E01322-0

  • Demonstrating and Trialing Products• Potential replacements have to work for the process!

    • With trials, observe how the trial product compares to the current product• Time it takes to do the job

    • Does it leave any unwanted residue?

    • Can you use the same method? (type of rag, force needed to clean, etc)

    • Overall, can you achieve the results required for the job?

  • Round 2: Duluth Degreasing Blitz• Air Quality Project for Duluth, Minnesota,

    EPA “Making a Visible Difference in Communities”

    • Identified sites using the Mergent Intellect Database and developed a batch-geo road map for accomplishing the site visits.

    • Needed to be fast due to travel constraints

    • 50 shops visited in two days• 32 Businesses sampled product, 16 redeemed

    vouchers, 10 sites implemented change

    • 1700 Pounds of VOCs, 660 Pounds HAPs EPA CEP Grant Project X9-00E02031

    https://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/making-visible-difference-communities

  • Vendors and Samples

    • Worked with local suppliers in advance to get buy-in• Advanced Auto Parts

    • O’Reilly

    • Auto Value

    • Put together a product list

    • Acquired samples

    • Created vouchers.

  • Blitz Assessments• Quick Intro

    • University of Minnesota Project on brake cleaners• Offer a free case of brake cleaner.

    • Goals:• reduce VOCs, chemicals that contribute to air

    pollution• HAPs, chemicals that can have adverse effects on

    human health

    • Collect information• Type of brake cleaner used• Quantity • Preferred vendors

    • Provide sample product and voucher

    • Follow up by phone within a month to learn how the safer product worked.

  • Round 3: Phillips Community Small Automotive Businesses

    • The Phillips community is an area of Minneapolis with high concentrations of environmental impacts.

    • A MnTAP intern was based at a community partner to work with small businesses.

    • Partnerships with business groups were helpful in building trust.• Short initial contact • Provide samples after assessment• Quick in-person follow up• Contacted 24 shops

    • 14 participated, 11 made changes• 430 lbs HAPs, 840 lbs VOCs

    EPA SRA X9-00E02051

  • Overall Outcomes• 89 facilities engaged/informed of

    safer products

    • 55 facilities conducted trials

    • 22 facilities implemented change

    • 4700 lbs VOCs eliminated

    • 1400 lbs HAPs eliminated

    • 650 lbs of solid waste by changing to bulk products

    • $7,740 per year in savings for businesses

  • Key Learning - Engagement

    • Providing trial product critical to engagement

    • Community partnerships help build trust

    • Not easy for facilities to choose safer products

    • Simple messaging is important• Avoid technical jargon• Focus on human health risks - especially exposure to HAPs• Helpful to explain that sample products have tested positively with other sites

    • Quick visits are good, showing that you understand their time constraints

    • Follow-up soon after visit (within 1 week recommended)

  • Key Learning - Formulations• Acetone – the VOC Exempt alternative

    • There were some complaints about smell and headaches• 50-60 wt% was a threshold where complaints increased

    • Common that employees don’t use any PPE when degreasing

    • Avoid HAPs• Toluene, xylene, ethylbenzene, and methanol were most common• Adding 5-10% to increase cleaning power in 90% Acetone mixes is still 5-

    10% HAPs

    • Citrus cleaners were not recommended• d-limonene is a VOC, MIR = 4.55, acute aquatic toxicity• Perception is that if it smells like oranges, its okay because its natural

    • One alternative may not work for every job – partial change is still an improvement

  • Key Learning – Bulk Products• Pressurized streams are preferred at most shops

    • Benefits• Bulk products are usually much cheaper than aerosol products

    • Reduce packaging

    • Eliminate propellants, which also may be VOCs

    • Obstacles• Often only available in 55 gallon drums

    • Too much inventory for small businesses

    • Difficult to transport

    • May create reporting obligation, hazardous waste generator

    • Upgrading from bulk cleaner to the safest bulk cleaners is often a big price increase

  • • It is helpful to get suppliers on board

    • Suppliers may/may not stock safer products

    • Education is needed.• Many of the best options are formulated for California.

    Some suppliers think these products cannot be sold elsewhere.

    • Pricing and supplier relationships are big• Shops may get a great deal if they have one supplier for

    all products

    Key Learning - Working with suppliers

  • What’s Ahead- Round 4: North Minneapolis• North Minneapolis is another area with higher than average air

    quality impacts.

    • Grant funded by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

    • Plan to work with a variety of businesses, automotive and industrial

    • Engagements will be by MnTAP staff, with a format similar to Phillips intern project

    • Preparation in progress now, outreach and trials at businesses planned for late fall 2017-spring 2018.

  • Resources• Webinar and video case studies

    • http://www.mntap.umn.edu/resources/webinars/

    • MnTAP Source Degreasing Issue• http://www.mntap.umn.edu/download/161

    /2016-2020/11838/source-2016-issue-1.pdf

    MnTAP’s Degreasing Busters

    http://www.mntap.umn.edu/resources/webinars/

  • Minnesota Technical Assistance Program

    Strengthening Minnesota businesses by improving efficiency while saving money through energy, water, and waste reduction

    Thank You!

    Jane Paulson

    612-624-1826

    [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]