1
S O U T H F L O R I D A W A T E R M A N A G E M E N T D I S T R I C T Everglades Patterning: Altered Water, Altered Landscape* Martha K. Nungesser, Ph.D., Senior Scientist Applied Sciences Bureau, Water Resources Division • Clusters of pattern metrics corresponded to pattern quality • Patterns were dynamic - improving, degrading, or stable • Pattern trajectories varied by location rather than uniformly across the landscape • Patterns degraded where conditions were dry and survived or improved where wet • Patterns show multi-decadal resilience Patterns reflect the effects of hydrological drivers on the ecosystem Local, rather than regional, hydrologic conditions now dominate patterning Metrics provide quantifiable restoration targets Metrics are easily measured and calculated, cost-effective Patterns seem to respond to local hydrology in a few years It is essential to keep the Ridge and Slough landscape well hydrated to retain the patterns The Everglades is a unique subtropical patterned peatland. The original natural patterns were elongated ridges and tree islands among interconnected sloughs, all highly directional and uniform across the peatland. Water management over 130 years has altered hydrology and patterns have changed in response. Restoration of this Ridge and Slough landscape is a major target of Everglades restoration. To understand how and when patterns altered, we mapped patterns at 15 study plots over time in Water Conservation Area 3 (WCA-3), where most of the remaining patterned areas are located, from a time series of aerial photographs (1940, 1953, 1972, 1984, and 2004). Metrics to quantify changes were developed, applied, and analyzed to determine declines and improvements in pattern quality for each of 15 study plots (Nungesser 2011). Trajectories tracing pattern quality for each plot show improvements, degradation, and stability of patterns. By understanding pattern change trajectories and hydrologic patterns at those sites, we can better understand how to restore the Ridge and Slough. Each study plot was located on georeferenced aerial photographs from the years 1940, 1953, 1972, 1984, and 2004, producing a time series of 5 maps for each location (75 maps). Metrics of ridges/tree islands included length/width ratio, perimeter/area ratio, total number, maximum length, and two indices: LeWN and PAN (defined at right, above). Hierarchical clusters of all 75 plots of these values identified 5 major groupings ranging from strong patterns to degraded patterns. NMDS (non-metric multidimensional scaling) confirmed validity of these clusters, and correlations indicated that the number of long, thin ridges dominated pattern strength. Trajectories of these 5 categories were plotted to see changes in quality over 64 years. South Florida Water Management District 3301 Gun Club Rd. West Palm Beach, FL 33406 USA 561-682-6614; [email protected] Patterns Lake Okeechobee Ridge and Slough Simulated pre-drainage image (left) showing the pre-drainage system and current satellite image (right) of south Florida 1900 2000 1950 1912-21 1937-44 1965-73 1952-63 1980-85 Major canals Droughts WCA Structures Severe muck fires Brief Timeline of Everglades Alterations Levee gates ?-1931 Miami Canal cuts, Alligator Alley S Lake O. levee 1917-28 Tamiami Trail 1900-1950 -- drainage, peat dried out 1950-2000 -- water storage, compartmentalization, no flow Drainage, drought, fire, compartmentalization, flooding, and lack of variation in water depths altered natural hydropatterns. Canals drained most of eastern and central WCA-3, then compartmentalization drained the north and flooded southern and eastern WCA-3A. Patterns reflect these changes in hydrologic conditions. Photos courtesy of C. McVoy Strong patterns Poor patterns Degraded Strong patterns Degraded patterns Below is part of study plot I1, an area of original strong patterning that degraded over time. All of the pre-drainage Ridge and Slough landscape was strongly patterned (McVoy et al. 2011). The red circle encloses a rare unchanged feature in the area. 1940 2004 Time Series of Changes in Plot I1, 1940-2004 Ridge and Slough metrics used in this analysis: L=length, W=width, P=perimeter, A=area, n=number of ridges >300 m long. Indices: n LeWN = Σ L/W ; i=1 n PAN = Σ P/A i=1 Data from all 75 maps were classified using agglomerative hierarchical clustering. Clusters identified categories of strong, good, moderate, poor, and degraded patterns (top to bottom, 5 to 1 respectively). Strong (5) Good (4) Moderate (3) Poor (2) Degraded (1) Distance (Objective Function) Information Remaining (%) 1.3E-06 100 2.8E-01 75 5.7E-01 50 8.5E-01 25 1.1E+00 0 G1_1940 G4_1940 G1_2004 G4_1953 G3_1972 G3_1984 N5_2004 G2_1940 I1_1940 I5_1940 N3_1940 G3_2004 G4_2004 G1_1953 G1_1984 G1_1972 G2_1972 G4_1984 N2_1984 I3_2004 N4_1972 N6_1940 G2_1953 N2_2004 G4_1972 N3_1953 G2_1984 N5_1972 G2_2004 N2_1940 N3_1984 N2_1972 N3_1972 N4_2004 I2_2004 N6_1953 N4_1984 N5_1984 G3_1940 I4_1940 N5_1940 I3_1953 N4_1940 I1_1984 I4_1984 I4_1972 I1_2004 N1_1984 I3_1940 G3_1953 N5_1953 N1_1953 I2_1972 I3_1984 N6_2004 I1_1972 I2_1984 N4_1953 N6_1972 I3_1972 N1_1940 I2_1953 N1_1972 I4_2004 N2_1953 I1_1953 I5_1972 I2_1940 I5_1953 N1_2004 I4_1953 N6_1984 I5_1984 I5_2004 N3_2004 Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (ordination) produced excellent agreement with the clusters, showing clear distinctions between the groups. Pattern ranks: 5: Strong, 4: Good, 3: Moderate, 2: Poor, 1: Degraded References: McVoy, C.W., W.A. Park, J. Obeysekera, J.A. VanArman, and T.W. Dreschel. 2011. Landscapes and Hydrology of the Pre-drainage Everglades. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. * Nungesser, Martha K. 2011. Reading the landscape: Temporal and spatial changes in a patterned peatland. Wetlands Ecology and Management (19:6): 475-493. Provides a landscape report card on the state of the ecosystem: Cost-effective, timely, and simple to measure Landscape conditions and changes readily tracked Ideal for adaptive management Rule of Thumb: Pattern strength is dominated by LeWN and by the number of ridges longer than 300 m Good to Strong: 20+ long ridges LeWN > 100 Moderate: 10-20 long ridges 100 > LeWN > 50 Poor or degraded: < 10 long ridges LeWN < 50 ANALYSIS AND RESULTS Correlations indicate that the clusters are most strongly defined by the LeWN index and the number of ridges/tree islands (correlation with Axis 1, the x axis). Water Conservation Area 3, consisting of compartments A, and B, is located in south Florida and is part of the Everglades restoration area Water Conservation Area 3 I-75 Tamiami Trail Aerial photo showing locations of 15 study plots, 4 km x 6 km in size, along 3 transects - G, N, and I from west to east in WCA-3A and -3B. 3A 3B What do these patterns look like? Strong patterns are long, linear, and regularly spaced. Degraded patterns have disappeared, and open wet areas are sparse. Immediately below are aerial views and below these are their appearance from the ground and at low elevation. Means comparisons of variables defining pattern quality. Letters in parentheses indicate the group memberships; those that are the same indicate no significant differences for that variable in the category DATA AND MAPS CONCLUSIONS Sample of digitized maps and pattern degradation from 1940 (upper left) to 2004 (lower right) in study plot I1. The tan represents emergent vegetation (ridges and tree islands) and blue shows open water. BACKGROUND TRAJECTORIES OF PATTERN QUALITY (Highest is Strong, lowest is Degraded) Examples: Acknowledgements: Special thanks to Christopher McVoy, Steven Friedman, Malak Ali, Naiming Wang, Sue Hohner, and Thomas Dreschel for their valuable help with this project. 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category N TRAJECTORIES OF PATTERN QUALITY IN STUDY PLOTS HYDROPATTERNS 1940-1960s Drained by canals 1960s-2004 : Dry in north Wet in south Wet west of diagonal canal Improving, southwestern WCA-3A 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category Degrading, northern WCA-3A 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category Slight change, western WCA-3A 0 6 1940 1953 1972 1984 2004 Category WCA-3A WCA-3B

S OUT H F L ORI D A WAT E R M ANAG E M E N T DI S T RI C T · S OUT H F L ORI D A WAT E R M ANAG E M E N T DI S T RI C T . Everglades Patterning: Altered Water, Altered Landscape*

  • Upload
    lengoc

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: S OUT H F L ORI D A WAT E R M ANAG E M E N T DI S T RI C T · S OUT H F L ORI D A WAT E R M ANAG E M E N T DI S T RI C T . Everglades Patterning: Altered Water, Altered Landscape*

S O U T H F L O R I D A W A T E R M A N A G E M E N T D I S T R I C T

Everglades Patterning: Altered Water, Altered Landscape* Martha K. Nungesser, Ph.D., Senior Scientist

Applied Sciences Bureau, Water Resources Division

• Clusters of pattern metrics corresponded to pattern quality • Patterns were dynamic - improving, degrading, or stable • Pattern trajectories varied by location rather than uniformly

across the landscape • Patterns degraded where conditions were dry and survived or

improved where wet • Patterns show multi-decadal resilience

• Patterns reflect the effects of hydrological drivers on the ecosystem

• Local, rather than regional, hydrologic conditions now dominate patterning

• Metrics provide quantifiable restoration targets • Metrics are easily measured and calculated, cost-effective • Patterns seem to respond to local hydrology in a few years • It is essential to keep the Ridge and Slough landscape well

hydrated to retain the patterns

The Everglades is a unique subtropical patterned peatland. The original natural patterns were elongated ridges and tree islands among interconnected sloughs, all highly directional and uniform across the peatland. Water management over 130 years has altered hydrology and patterns have changed in response. Restoration of this Ridge and Slough landscape is a major target of Everglades restoration. To understand how and when patterns altered, we mapped patterns at 15 study plots over time in Water Conservation Area 3 (WCA-3), where most of the remaining patterned areas are located, from a time series of aerial photographs (1940, 1953, 1972, 1984, and 2004). Metrics to quantify changes were developed, applied, and analyzed to determine declines and improvements in pattern quality for each of 15 study plots (Nungesser 2011). Trajectories tracing pattern quality for each plot show improvements, degradation, and stability of patterns. By understanding pattern change trajectories and hydrologic patterns at those sites, we can better understand how to restore the Ridge and Slough.

Each study plot was located on georeferenced aerial photographs from the years 1940, 1953, 1972, 1984, and 2004, producing a time series of 5 maps for each location (75 maps). Metrics of ridges/tree islands included length/width ratio, perimeter/area ratio, total number, maximum length, and two indices: LeWN and PAN (defined at right, above). Hierarchical clusters of all 75 plots of these values identified 5 major groupings ranging from strong patterns to degraded patterns. NMDS (non-metric multidimensional scaling) confirmed validity of these clusters, and correlations indicated that the number of long, thin ridges dominated pattern strength. Trajectories of these 5 categories were plotted to see changes in quality over 64 years.

South Florida Water Management District 3301 Gun Club Rd. West Palm Beach, FL 33406 USA 561-682-6614; [email protected]

Patterns

Lake Okeechobee

Ridge and Slough

Simulated pre-drainage image (left) showing the pre-drainage system and current satellite image (right) of south Florida

1900 20001950

1912-21 1937-44 1965-731952-63 1980-85

Major canals Droughts

WCAStructures

Severe muck fires

Brief Timeline of Everglades Alterations

Levee gates

?-1931

Miami Canal cuts,Alligator Alley

S Lake O.levee

1917-28

Tamiami Trail

1900-1950 -- drainage, peat dried out

1950-2000 -- water storage, compartmentalization, no flow

Drainage, drought, fire, compartmentalization, flooding, and lack of variation in water depths altered natural hydropatterns. Canals drained most of eastern and central WCA-3, then compartmentalization drained the north and flooded southern and eastern WCA-3A. Patterns reflect these changes in hydrologic conditions.

Photos courtesy of C. McVoy

Strong patterns

Poor patterns

Degraded

Strong patterns Degraded patterns

Below is part of study plot I1, an area of original strong patterning that degraded over time. All of the pre-drainage Ridge and Slough landscape was strongly patterned (McVoy et al. 2011). The red circle encloses a rare unchanged feature in the area.

1940 2004

Time Series of Changes in Plot I1, 1940-2004

Ridge and Slough metrics used in this analysis: L=length, W=width, P=perimeter, A=area, n=number of ridges >300 m long. Indices:

n LeWN = Σ L/W ; i=1

n PAN = Σ P/A i=1

Data from all 75 maps were classified using agglomerative hierarchical clustering. Clusters identified categories of strong, good, moderate, poor, and degraded patterns (top to bottom, 5 to 1 respectively).

Strong (5)

Good (4)

Moderate (3)

Poor (2)

Degraded (1)

Distance (Objective Function)

Information Remaining (%)1.3E-06

100

2.8E-01

75

5.7E-01

50

8.5E-01

25

1.1E+00

0

G1_1940G4_1940G1_2004G4_1953G3_1972G3_1984N5_2004G2_1940I1_1940I5_1940N3_1940G3_2004G4_2004G1_1953G1_1984G1_1972G2_1972G4_1984N2_1984I3_2004N4_1972N6_1940G2_1953N2_2004G4_1972N3_1953G2_1984N5_1972G2_2004N2_1940N3_1984N2_1972N3_1972N4_2004I2_2004N6_1953N4_1984N5_1984G3_1940I4_1940N5_1940I3_1953N4_1940I1_1984I4_1984I4_1972I1_2004N1_1984I3_1940G3_1953N5_1953N1_1953I2_1972I3_1984N6_2004I1_1972I2_1984N4_1953N6_1972I3_1972N1_1940I2_1953N1_1972I4_2004N2_1953I1_1953I5_1972I2_1940I5_1953N1_2004I4_1953N6_1984I5_1984I5_2004N3_2004

Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (ordination) produced excellent agreement with the clusters, showing clear distinctions between the groups.

Pattern ranks: 5: Strong, 4: Good, 3: Moderate, 2: Poor, 1: Degraded

References: McVoy, C.W., W.A. Park, J. Obeysekera, J.A. VanArman, and T.W. Dreschel. 2011. Landscapes and Hydrology of the Pre-drainage Everglades. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. * Nungesser, Martha K. 2011. Reading the landscape: Temporal and spatial changes in a patterned peatland. Wetlands Ecology and Management (19:6): 475-493.

Provides a landscape report card on the state of the ecosystem: Cost-effective, timely, and simple to measure

Landscape conditions and changes readily

tracked

Ideal for adaptive management

Rule of Thumb: Pattern strength is dominated by LeWN and by the number of ridges longer than 300 m Good to Strong: 20+ long ridges LeWN > 100

Moderate: 10-20 long ridges 100 > LeWN > 50

Poor or degraded: < 10 long ridges LeWN < 50

ANALYSIS AND RESULTS

Correlations indicate that the clusters are most strongly defined by the LeWN index and the number of ridges/tree islands (correlation with Axis 1, the x axis).

Water Conservation Area 3, consisting of compartments A,

and B, is located in south Florida and is part of the

Everglades restoration area

Water Conservation Area 3

I-75

Tamiami Trail

Aerial photo showing locations of 15 study plots, 4 km x 6 km in size, along 3 transects - G, N, and I from west to east in WCA-3A and -3B.

3A

3B

What do these patterns look like? Strong patterns are long, linear, and regularly spaced. Degraded patterns have disappeared, and open wet areas are sparse. Immediately below are aerial views and below these are their appearance from the ground and at low elevation.

Means comparisons of variables defining pattern quality. Letters in parentheses indicate the group memberships; those that are the same indicate no significant differences for that variable in the category

DATA AND MAPS

CONCLUSIONS

Sample of digitized maps and pattern degradation from 1940 (upper left) to 2004 (lower right) in study plot I1. The tan represents emergent vegetation (ridges and tree islands) and blue shows open water.

BACKGROUND

TRAJECTORIES OF PATTERN QUALITY (Highest is Strong, lowest is Degraded) Examples:

Acknowledgements: Special thanks to Christopher McVoy, Steven Friedman, Malak Ali, Naiming Wang, Sue Hohner, and Thomas Dreschel for their valuable help with this project.

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

N

TRAJECTORIES OF PATTERN QUALITY IN STUDY PLOTS

HYDROPATTERNS

1940-1960s • Drained by canals 1960s-2004: • Dry in north • Wet in south • Wet west of

diagonal canal

Improving, southwestern WCA-3A

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

Degrading, northern WCA-3A

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

Slight change, western WCA-3A

0

6

1940 1953 1972 1984 2004

Cat

egor

y

WCA-3A

WCA-3B