13
SECRETS COURT INTERPRETERS SHOULD SHARE WITH DEAF LITIGANTS A MARIE Center presentation Carla M. Mathers, Esq., CSC, SC: L

S ECRETS C OURT I NTERPRETERS SHOULD S HARE WITH D EAF L ITIGANTS A MARIE Center presentation Carla M. Mathers, Esq., CSC, SC: L

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: S ECRETS C OURT I NTERPRETERS SHOULD S HARE WITH D EAF L ITIGANTS A MARIE Center presentation Carla M. Mathers, Esq., CSC, SC: L

SECRETS COURT INTERPRETERS SHOULD SHARE WITH DEAF LITIGANTS

A MARIE Center presentation

Carla M. Mathers, Esq., CSC, SC: L

Page 2: S ECRETS C OURT I NTERPRETERS SHOULD S HARE WITH D EAF L ITIGANTS A MARIE Center presentation Carla M. Mathers, Esq., CSC, SC: L

LEGAL V COMMUNITY INTERPRETING: DIFFERENCES

Evidentiary doctrines and confidentiality Legal interpreter roles Ethics and protocol Modes of interpreting Preparation topics Working with CDIs

Page 3: S ECRETS C OURT I NTERPRETERS SHOULD S HARE WITH D EAF L ITIGANTS A MARIE Center presentation Carla M. Mathers, Esq., CSC, SC: L

CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS

Confidential Communications By client to an attorney For the purpose of legal representation

Protected Unless waived

04

/19

/23

(c) Ca

rla M

. Ma

the

rs

Page 4: S ECRETS C OURT I NTERPRETERS SHOULD S HARE WITH D EAF L ITIGANTS A MARIE Center presentation Carla M. Mathers, Esq., CSC, SC: L

EXTRA-JUDICIAL INTERPRETED STATEMENTS

D eaf S u sp ec tC on fess ion

S ig n erV o iced

In te rp re ta tiono f C on fess ion

O ffice rTes tifies to

th eC on fess ion

P o lice S ta tion

04

/19

/23

(c) Ca

rla M

. Ma

the

rs

Page 5: S ECRETS C OURT I NTERPRETERS SHOULD S HARE WITH D EAF L ITIGANTS A MARIE Center presentation Carla M. Mathers, Esq., CSC, SC: L

AUTHENTICATION

Nazemian Factors – Skills & Bias

Who is the interpreter? Who retained? Impartial? Qualified? Oath or substitute? Cross-examination.

04

/19

/23

(c) Ca

rla M

. Ma

the

rs

Page 6: S ECRETS C OURT I NTERPRETERS SHOULD S HARE WITH D EAF L ITIGANTS A MARIE Center presentation Carla M. Mathers, Esq., CSC, SC: L

COURT INTERPRETER ROLES

Proceedings interpreter Officer of the court/duty of loyalty Sworn to accuracy Interprets all proceedings and witnesses

Court Code of Professional Conduct Conflicts defined Voir dire Protocol for interruptions Prohibition against advising

Page 7: S ECRETS C OURT I NTERPRETERS SHOULD S HARE WITH D EAF L ITIGANTS A MARIE Center presentation Carla M. Mathers, Esq., CSC, SC: L

IMPARTIALITY

Appearance conflicts Interpreter interaction & Deaf cultural norms Disclosure conflicts and RID Confidentiality Un-interpreted information

Page 8: S ECRETS C OURT I NTERPRETERS SHOULD S HARE WITH D EAF L ITIGANTS A MARIE Center presentation Carla M. Mathers, Esq., CSC, SC: L

LEGAL ADVICE

Deaf culture sharing information rules Prohibition of giving legal advice

Page 9: S ECRETS C OURT I NTERPRETERS SHOULD S HARE WITH D EAF L ITIGANTS A MARIE Center presentation Carla M. Mathers, Esq., CSC, SC: L

COUNSEL TABLE INTERPRETER

Privileged communications Monitor function Contemporaneous objection rule Litigation team member Qualifications and voir dire

04

/19

/23

(c) Ca

rla M

. Ma

the

rs

Page 10: S ECRETS C OURT I NTERPRETERS SHOULD S HARE WITH D EAF L ITIGANTS A MARIE Center presentation Carla M. Mathers, Esq., CSC, SC: L

MODES OF INTERPRETING

Sight translation Forms

Consecutive interpreting Note-taking

Simultaneous interpreting Settings

Summary interpreting Settings

Page 11: S ECRETS C OURT I NTERPRETERS SHOULD S HARE WITH D EAF L ITIGANTS A MARIE Center presentation Carla M. Mathers, Esq., CSC, SC: L

WORKING WITH CDIS

What it means What it does not mean When indicated When standard

Page 12: S ECRETS C OURT I NTERPRETERS SHOULD S HARE WITH D EAF L ITIGANTS A MARIE Center presentation Carla M. Mathers, Esq., CSC, SC: L

SECRETS TO SHARE

Court is different RID Confidentiality No private negotiations Different clarifications Un-interpreted information Disclosures No legal advice/offer to interpret No Sim-Com Benefits of a table interpreter Consecutive interpreting & cuing system Summary interpreting uses Benefits of a CDI

04

/19

/23

(c) Ca

rla M

. Ma

the

rs

Page 13: S ECRETS C OURT I NTERPRETERS SHOULD S HARE WITH D EAF L ITIGANTS A MARIE Center presentation Carla M. Mathers, Esq., CSC, SC: L

FINAL QUESTIONS & NEXT STEPS

Next webinar: July 29, 2013. 6 – 7:30 EST Topic: Interpreting in Family Law Settings

Change in series date: Final session on depositions is not Sept 7. Will be September 21, 2013 at 1:30 pm EST

Archived sessions: http://www.unco.edu/marie/ Left column navigation to Webinars

CEUs – Carolyn White at [email protected]

Thank you and good day.