RYERSE BRIDGE - Norfolk County, Ontario...Municipal Structure Inspection Form NORFOLK COUNTY RYERSE BRIDGE Site Number 010039 MILL ROAD (CONCESSION 2), WOODHOUSE 1.13 km E of County

Municipal Structure Inspection Form NORFOLK COUNTY

RYERSE BRIDGE

Site Number 010039

MILL ROAD (CONCESSION 2), WOODHOUSE

1.13 km E of County Road 5

G. Douglas Vallee Limited

Ontario Structure Inspection Manual - Inspection Form Site Number:

Inventory Data:

Structure Name Ryerse Bridge

X On Rail Road Navig. Water

Main Hwy/Road # Ped. Other X Non-Navig. Water

Under

Hwy/Road Name MILL ROAD (CONCESSION 2), WOODHOUSE

Structure Location 1.13 km E of county road 5

Latitude Longitude

X Not Cons. List/not Design.

Owner(s) Cons./not App. Desig./not List

MTO Region 30 Road Class: Freeway Arterial Collector Local

MTO District 31 Posted Speed No. of Lanes

Old County 20 AADT % Trucks

Geographic Twp. 215 Inspection Route Sequence

Structure Type 6 Interchange Number

Total Deck Length 35.7 (m) Interchange Structure Number

Overall Str. Width 11 (m) Min. Vertical Clearance (m)

Total Deck Area 392.7 (m2) Special Route Truck Emergency - School Bicycle

Roadway Width 9.6 (m) Detour Length Around Bridge (km)

Skew Angle 10 (Degrees) Direction of Structure

No. of Spans 2 Fill on Structure (m)

Span Length 2 @ '17.5 (m)

Historical Data:

Year Built Year of Last Major Rehab.

Last OSIM Inspection Last Evaluation

Last Enhanced OSIM Inspection Current Load Limit / / (tonnes)

Enhanced Access Equipment

(ladder, boat, lift, etc.)

Last Underwater Inspection By-Law Expiry Date

Last Condition Survey

Rehab History: (Date/description)

Desig.

& List

42d 48' 04" N

I-Beam or Girders

CON 2 WOODHOUSE

010039

Southwestern

London / Stratford

Crossing

Type:

Norfolk

80d 11' 03" W

2

Norfolk County

Heritage

Designation:

80

East / West

8

0

172

Woodhouse

May 27, 2014

1980

Load Limit By-Law #


Page 1

Site Number:

Field Inspection Information:

Type of Inspection: X OSIM Enhanced OSIM

oC

Urgent

Material Condition Survey

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Investigation Notes:

Overall Structure Notes:

None Minor Rehab. Replace

X Maintenance Major Rehab.

Timing of Recommended Work: 1 to 5 years 6 to 10 years

Overall Comments:

Date of next Inspection:

Suspected Performance Deficiencies

01 Load carrying capacity 07 Bearing not uniformly loaded/unstable 12 Slippery surfaces

02 Excessive deformations (deflections & rotations) 08 Jammed expansion joint 13 Flooding/channel blockage

03 Continuing settlement 09 Pedestrian/vehicular hazard 14 Undermining of foundation

04 Continuing movements 10 Rough riding surface 15 Unstable embankments

05 Seized bearings 11 Deck drainage 16 Other

Maintenance Needs

01 Lift and swing bridge maintenance 07 Repair to structural steel 13 Erosion control at bridges

02 Bridge cleaning 08 Repair of bridge concrete 14 Concrete sealing

03 Bridge handrail maintenance 09 Repair of bridge timber 15 Rout and seal

04 Painting steel bridge structures 10 Bailey bridges - maintenance 16 Bridge deck drainage

05 Bridge deck joint repair 11 Animal/pest control 17 Scaling (Loose concrete or ACR steel)

06 Bridge bearing maintenance 12 Bridge surface repair 18 Other

Ontario Structure Inspection Manual - Inspection Form

X

Monitoring Crack Widths:

010039

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Date of Inspection:

Inspector:

Others in Party:

X

X

July 20, 2016

Concrete Substructure Condition Survey:

Post-Tensioned Strand Investigation

Ben Buchwald M.Eng., EIT, G. Douglas Vallee Ltd.

N/A

Hammer, Binoculars, Measuring Tape, Camera, etc.

26

Access Equipment Used:

Sunny Weather:

Temperature:

Monitoring of Deformations, Settlements and Movements:

Detailed Coating Condition Survey:

Detailed Timber Investigation

Recommended Work on Structure:

July 20, 2018

Underwater Investigation:

Fatigue Investigation:

Structure Evaluation:

Monitoring

X

X

Seismic Investigation:

Detailed Deck Condition Survey:

Non-destructive Delamination Survey of Asphalt-Covered Deck:

PriorityAdditional Investigation Required:

None Normal


Page 2


Rehab Replace

Bearings

Abutment Walls

Wearing Surface (Approaches)

Railing System

Girders

Drainage

Deck Top

Embankments

Slope Protections

Seals/Sealants

Shafts/Columns/Pile Bents

Slope Protections

Total Cost $0

Associated Work:

Estimated

Construction

Cost

Additional Investigations

Traffic Management

Utilities

Road Allowance

Environmental Assessment

Engineering

Other

Contingencies

Total Cost $0

Notes: Construction Cost:Associated Work Cost:

010039

Rehabilitation Required:Element

Priority Estimated

Construction

CostUrgent Within 1 yr 1-5 yrs 6-10 yrs

Comments

Justification:

$0

$0

$0TOTAL Estimated Cost:


Page 3


Element Data

Element Group: Abutments Length:

Element Name: Bearings Width:

Location: Under Girders Height:

Material: Count:

Element Type: Elastomeric Pad Total Quantity: Each

Environment: Benign Limited Inspection:

Protection System:

Comments:

Rehab Replace

Timing: Urgent < 1yr 1 - 5 yr 6 - 10 yr Urgent 1 year X 2 year

Element Group: Abutments Length:

Element Name: Abutment Walls Width:

Location: East and West End Height:

Material: Cast-in-place Concrete Count:

Element Type: Total Quantity: sq.m


Protection System:

Comments:

Rehab Replace

Timing: Urgent < 1yr 1 - 5 yr 6 - 10 yr Urgent 1 year 2 year

Element Group: Approaches Length:

Element Name: Wearing Surface (Approaches) Width:

Location: Height:

Material: Asphalt Count:

Element Type: Total Quantity: Each

Environment: Severe Limited Inspection:

Protection System:

Comments:

Rehab Replace


Perform. Deficiencies



Vertical hairline cracks in both abutments throughout .

Recommended Work: Maintenance Needs:

Condition

Data:

1600

1601

None

0 0

Wearing surface has cracks & patching along expansion joints.

Recommended Work: Maintenance Needs: Rout and Seal

Condition

Data:

Units Exc. Good Fair Poor

Each 0 2

Unknown

2

Poor

sq.m 0 35.6 8.4 0

Units Exc. Good Fair

Recommended Work: Maintenance Needs: Concrete Sealing

901

4

44

2

2

900

0 285 0 0

Hairline cracking at wingwalls around bearing location.

11

None

Condition

Data:


Each

010039

900

904

28

28

2

2


Page 4


Element Data

Element Group: Barriers Length:

Element Name: Railing System Width:

Location: North and South Height:


Element Type: Parapet Wall with Single Railing Total Quantity: m


Protection System:

Comments:

Rehab Replace


Element Group: Beam / MLE Length:

Element Name: Girders Width:

Location: Height:

Material: Precast Concrete Count:

Element Type: I-type Total Quantity: m


Protection System:

Comments:

Rehab Replace


Element Group: Decks Length:

Element Name: Drainage Width:

Location: Through Deck Height:

Material: Steel Count:

Element Type: Metal Drain Pipes Total Quantity: Each


Protection System:

Comments:

Rehab Replace



Minor surface corrosion at ends.


Condition

Data:


Each 0 4 0 0

4 4

Includes all precast concrete I-beams and diaphragms.


106

14 4

100

m 0 238 0 0

None Perform. Deficiencies

Condition

Data:


238

Southeast railing cap missing. Various small areas of impact damage and areas with exposed reinforcement. Localized areas of small

spalls and cracking on curbs.

Recommended Work: Maintenance Needs: Repair of Bridge Concrete

501

12 14

500 17

m 0 0 92 2

PoorCondition

Data:



010039

400 47

402 0.2

0.8

4 2

94


Page 5


Element Data

Element Group: Decks Length:

Element Name: Deck Top Width:

Location: Top of girders Height:


Element Type: Cast-in-place Concrete on Supports Total Quantity: sq.m


Protection System:

Comments:

Rehab Replace


Element Group: Embankments & Streams Length:

Element Name: Embankments Width:

Location: Height:

Material: Count:



Protection System:

Comments:

Rehab Replace



Element Name: Slope Protections Width:

Location: North and south wall and in front of abutment wallHeight:

Material: Count:


Environment: Limited Inspection:

Protection System:

Comments:

Rehab Replace




Condition

Data:


Each 0 1 0 0

1

Excessive vegetation.


1403

1

1400

Each 0 1 0 0

Unknown Perform. Deficiencies

Condition

Data:


1

Super-elevated to south. Exposed concrete deck, two patch potholes and one small pothole forming.

Recommended Work: Maintenance Needs: Bridge Concrete Repair

1402

1

1400

sq.m 0 392.6 0.1 0

PoorCondition

Data:



010039

100 35.7

102 11

4 1

392.7


Page 6


Element Data

Element Group: Joints Length:

Element Name: Seals/Sealants Width:

Location: East and West End of Deck Height:

Material: Count:

Element Type: Joint Embedded in Elastomeric Concrete Total Quantity: m


Protection System:

Comments:

Rehab Replace


Element Group: Piers Length:

Element Name: Shafts/Columns/Pile Bents Width:

Location: Midspan Height:


Element Type: Concrete Rectangular Columns with Cap Total Quantity: sq.m

Environment: Moderate Limited Inspection:

Protection System:

Comments:

Rehab Replace



Element Name: Slope Protections Width:

Location: North and south Height:

Material: Count:


Environment: Limited Inspection:

Protection System:

Comments:

Rehab Replace


Recommended Work: Maintenance Needs: Erosion Control at Bridge

Regrade slopes to drain away from wingwall tops. - Suspected cause of deterioration of quadrants.


Condition

Data:


Each 0 0 0 1

1

There is a vertical crack on both the east and west face of the pier above the water level.


1403

1

1400

sq.m 0 48 0 0


Condition

Data:


48

Joints are armoured compression - need cleaning of debris. Concrete deteriorated at joints, curb and parapet. Wearing surface is

cracking at joints. Joint seals are slightly separating in small localized areas on both approaches.


1001 12

2

4 2

1000

m 0 22 0 0

PoorCondition

Data:



010039

200 11

201

2

22


Page 7

Municipal Structure Inspection Form Structure Number NORFOLK COUNTY 010039

Date Printed: August 9, 2016 G. Douglas Vallee Limited

Figure 1 East Approach

Figure 2 West Approach



Figure 3 North Profile

Figure 4 South Profile



Figure 5 Upstream

Figure 6 Downstream



Figure 7 East Abutment

Figure 8 West Abutment



Figure 9 East Soffit

Figure 10 West Soffit



Figure 11 East Face of Pier

Figure 12 Centre Pier



Figure 13 West Face of Pier

Figure 14 Impact Damage with Exposed Rebar at Northeast Quadrant



Figure 15 Localized Areas of Minor Delamination on Northeast Wingwall

Figure 16 Small Pop-Out with Exposed Rebar on east Diaphragm



Figure 17 Typical Bearing

Figure 18 Vertical Crack in Centre Pier



Figure 19 Impact Damage on South Barrier with Exposed Rebar

Figure 20 Missing Barrier Cap at Southwest Quadrant



Figure 21 Typical Deck Drains



Figure 22 Patch Pothole on Deck

Figure 23 Small Pothole Forming on Deck



Figure 24 East Joint



Figure 25 West Joint



Figure 26 Spall and Deterioration on Curb at West Joint

Figure 27 Date Stamp

Documents

RYERSE BRIDGE - Norfolk County, Ontario...Municipal Structure Inspection Form NORFOLK COUNTY RYERSE BRIDGE Site Number 010039 MILL ROAD (CONCESSION 2), WOODHOUSE 1.13 km E of County