Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RWANDA, LAND OF THOUSAND HILLS ...OF SOIL EROSION ...
Jules Rutebuka, A. Uwimanzi, O. Nkundwakazi, N. Ryken, A. VerdoodtDepartment of Soil Management
Steep, cropped fields in Rwanda
Siltation in the valleys, sand deposits
Effects of soil conservation practices on water erosion control in two agro-ecological zones of Rwanda
AND SOIL EROSION CONTROL
Jules Rutebuka, A. Uwimanzi, O. Nkundwakazi, N. Ryken, A. VerdoodtDepartment of Soil Management
Radical terraces
Progressive terraces
What is their effectiveness in terms of erosion control, soil quality and yield?
Does this effectiveness differ by agro-climatic zone?
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Jules Rutebuka, A. Uwimanzi, O. Nkundwakazi, N. Ryken, A. VerdoodtDepartment of Soil Management
EXPERIMENTSTangata
Murehe
Erosion plots on radical terraces (RT)
Bare plots (BP), no control (NP)
Progressive terraces (PT)
Cropping seasons 2016A & BEvent-based monitoring soil lossSoil quality assessment
Buberuka Highlands (Tangata) are much more exposed to erosion than sloping areas of the Eastern plateau (Murehe).
PRELIMINARY RESULTSErosive events? Run-off coefficients? Soil losses?
Parameter Tangata 2016A
Tangata2016B
Murehe2016A
Murehe2016B
N° events 53 33 48 17
N° erosive events 6 5 4 5
Threshold erosive rainfall amount (mm) 15 16 25 25
Min. rainfall (mm) 3.5 3 1.2 1.3
Max.rainfall (mm) 36 26 46.8 46.4
Min. “intensity” (mm/hr) 7.8 4.5 4.4 4.8
Max. “intensity” (mm/hr) 54 60 208.8 26.7
Event-based results
Maximum run-off coefficient (%) 3.29-17.9 1.2-8.5 0.8-10.7 0.8-6.6
Maximum soil loss 0.01-39.2 0.01-5.6
Seasonal results
Run-off coefficient (%) 0.8- 4.6 0.6-2.9 0.3 - 1.8 0.4-2.5
Soil loss (ton/ha) 0.05 - 91.6 0.04 - 7.3
PRELIMINARY RESULTSRelative effectiveness of erosion control measures
Effectiveness of erosion control measure compared to non-protected land
Tangata 2016A
Tangata2016B
Murehe2016A
Murehe2016B
Progressive terraces
- Run-off % 47 40 -78 -65
- Soil loss % 98 -5
Radical terraces
- Run-off % 72 76 67 76
- Soil loss % 100% 93%
EFFECTIVE
EFFECTIVE
INEFFECTIVE
EFFECTIVE
RT plots are most effective to reduce runoff and soil loss while PT plots are only ineffective in Murehe due to installation and maintenance
PRELIMINARY RESULTSSoil quality effects of terracing?
Site Treatment SOC(%)
Ntot(%)
Exch. Ca(cmol+/kg)
Tangata NP 2.35±0.09a 0.18±0.01a 0.26±0.01a
RT 2.29±0.10a 0.17±0.01a 0.28±0.03a
PT 2.01±0.07b 0.15±0.01b 0.19±0.01b
Murehe NP 2.08±0.11a 0.21±0.01a 0.18±0.04a
RT 2.01±0.26ab 0.20±0.02a 0.29±0.10b
PT 1.87±0.15b 0.19±0.01a 0.18±0.01a
Soil quality is mainly influenced by plot history, past/current farmer’s management practices (fertilization, manuring). Indeed, terraces have no negative effect on soil quality status. Though the results are showing the impact of erosion control measures, These are still preliminary results that require some additional assessment
Thank You