Rutherford County Judicial Centerrcsharepoint.rutherfordcountytn.gov/sites/pba/Judicial Building/15... · Review (4) Functional Plan Layouts • Sally Port configuration ... VIEWS

Rutherford County Judicial CenterDRC Meeting 03.04.2015

AGENDA

1. Overview of SD schedule and milestone decisions

2. Review (4) Functional Plan Layouts

• Sally Port configuration

• Entry Lobby sequence and core location

• Site Orientation

3. Review Parking Garage Layouts

4. Review Bridge connection and potential budget impact

5. Questions and Discussion

6. Overview of “Next Steps”

OBJECTIVES

1. Gain consensus on functional plan option to be developed further

ARCHITECT SELECTION / NTP NO

V0

1

DE

C 1

5

JAN

21

MA

R0

4

MA

R 1

8

AP

R 0

1

AP

R 1

5

AP

R2

9

VISIONING / GUIDING

PRINCIPLES

COURT PAIRING AND

STACKING

FUNCTIONAL PLAN

DEVELOPMENT

BUILDING EXTERIOR --

VISIONING

EXTERIOR CONCEPTS

INTERIOR VISIONING

PRICING PACKAGE: BEGIN

OWNER REVIEW PROCESS

Schematic Design ScheduleWork/Research Periods

End of Phase Review

Monthly DRC Meetings

YOU ARE

HERE

01 …follow approved planning strategies outlined in the programming document to achieve

functional, efficient building design.

02 …provide a safe facility for visitors and employees

03 …be completed on time and constructed within the budget

04 …be designed for sustainability in respect to resource management, building performance

(energy efficiency), life cycle cost, maintenance and longevity

05 …provide a positive experience for visitors

06 …respect the historic context and existing character of downtown Murfreesboro

07 …have a positive impact on the streetscape and adjacent neighborhood, contributing to the

growth and vibrancy of downtown Murfreesboro

08 …provide a positive work environment for employees

09 …incorporate state of the art technology and be designed to accommodate future

advancements

10 …have a strong civic presence and convey a sense of justice and confidence in government

01 …follow approved planning strategies outlined in the programming document to achieve

functional, efficient building design.

02 …provide a safe facility for visitors and employees

03 …be completed on time and constructed within the budget

04 …be designed for sustainability in respect to resource management, building performance

(energy efficiency), life cycle cost, maintenance and longevity

05 …provide a positive experience for visitors

06 …respect the historic context and existing character of downtown Murfreesboro

07 …have a positive impact on the streetscape and adjacent neighborhood, contributing to the

growth and vibrancy of downtown Murfreesboro

08 …provide a positive work environment for employees

09 …incorporate state of the art technology and be designed to accommodate future

advancements

10 …have a strong civic presence and convey a sense of justice and confidence in government

GUIDING PRINCIPLESThe Rutherford County Judicial Center will…

01 FUNCTIONAL EFFICIENCY

02 SAFETY

03 COST EFFICIENCY

04 OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

05 VISITOR EXPERIENCE

06 RELATIONSHIP TO CONTEXT

07 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT

08 WORK ENVIRONMENT

09 TECHNOLOGY

10 CIVIC PRESENCE

EVALUATION CRITERIA


AGENDA






3. Review Parking Garage Layout




OBJECTIVES


A-1NORTH / SOUTH

INTERNAL

ON GRADE –

DRIVE THROUGH

SITE ORIENTATION

ELEVATOR LOCATION

SALLY PORT

Plan diagrams

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

A-2SITE ORIENTATION

ELEVATOR LOCATION

SALLY PORT

NORTH / SOUTH

EXTERNAL

BELOW GRADE –

DRIVE THROUGH

Plan diagrams

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

B-1EAST/WEST

INTERNAL

ON GRADE–

DRIVE IN / DRIVE OUT

SITE ORIENTATION

ELEVATOR LOCATION

SALLY PORT

Plan diagrams

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

B-2EAST/WEST

EXTERNAL

BELOW GRADE–

DRIVE IN / DRIVE OUT

SITE ORIENTATION

ELEVATOR LOCATION

SALLY PORT

Plan diagrams

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

01 FUNCTIONAL EFFICIENCY

02 SAFETY

03 COST EFFICIENCY

04 OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

05 VISITOR EXPERIENCE

06 RELATIONSHIP TO CONTEXT


08 WORK ENVIRONMENT

09 TECHNOLOGY

10 CIVIC PRESENCE

EVALUATION CRITERIA

01 FUNCTIONAL EFFICIENCYFUNCTIONAL COURT OPERATIONS

A-1 CONSOLIDATION OF CLERK OF COURT OPERATIONS

SECURE AND EFFICIENT MOVEMENT OF DETAINEES

BASEMENTGROUND FLOORLYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

CLERK-

CRIMINAL

CLERK-

CIVIL

CLERK

COLL

SALLY

PORT

ELEV

HOLDING

ELEV


A-2 CONSOLIDATION OF CLERK OF COURT OPERATIONS



BURTON STREET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

CLERK-

CRIMINAL

CLERK-

CIVIL

CLERK

COLL

SALLY

PORTHOLDING


B-1 CONSOLIDATION OF CLERK OF COURT OPERATIONS



BURTON STREET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

CLERK

COLL

CLERK-

CRIMINALCLERK-

CIVIL SALLY

PORT

ELEV

SALLY

PORT

ELEV


B-2 CONSOLIDATION OF CLERK OF COURT OPERATIONS



BURTON STREET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

CLERK

COLL

CLERK-

CIVIL

CLERK-

CRIMINAL

BURTON STREET

SALLY

PORT

HOLDING

01 FUNCTIONAL EFFICIENCYFUNCTIONAL COURT OPERATIONS: SUMMARY

CLERK OF COURT OPERATIONS

MOVEMENT OF DETAINEES



A-1 A-2CLERK OF COURT OPERATIONS




B-1 B-2

APPROPRIATE ENTRY SEQUENCE

WAY-FINDING : GROUND FLOOR

A-1

05 VISITOR EXPERIENCEWAYFINDING – GROUND FLOOR

FROM GARAGE

FR

OM

DO

WN

TO

WN

FR

OM

CO

UN

TY

BLD

G

INF

O

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET



A-1


CLERK CRIMINAL

CLERK CIVIL

JURY ASSEMBLY

INF

O

UP

TO

TC

UP

TO

GS

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

WAY-FINDING : 2ND FLOOR

A-1

05 VISITOR EXPERIENCEWAYFINDING – 2ND FLOOR

TYPICAL 2ND FLOOR DIAGRAM

INFO

UP

UP

INF

O

130’

230’

100’

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET



A-2


INFO

FROM GARAGE

FROM DOWNTOWN

FR

OM

CO

UN

TY

BLD

G

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET



A-2


INFO

CLERK CRIMINAL

CLERK CIVIL

JURY ASSEMBLY

UP TO

TC

UP

TO

GS

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

A-2




UP

UP

130’

100’

INFO

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET



B-1


INFO

FROM GARAGE

FROM DOWNTOWN

FR

OM

CO

UN

TY

BLD

G

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET



B-1


INFO

UP TO

TC

UP TO GS

CLERK

CRIMINALCLERK

CIVIL

JURY

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

B-1




UP

UP

INFO 130’100’

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET



B-2


INFO

FROM GARAGE

FROM DOWNTOWN

FR

OM

CO

UN

TY

BLD

G

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET



B-2


INFO

UP TO

TC

UP TO GS

CLERK

CRIMINAL

CLERK

CIVIL

JURY

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

B-2



TYPICAL 2ND FLOOR DIAGRAMUP UP

INFO 100’130’ INFO

200’30’

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

06 RELATIONSHIP TO

CONTEXTSCALE AND MASSING

A-1

1: VIEW FROM MAPLE ST LOOKING NORTH

2: VIEW FROM CORNER OF CHURCH/LYTLE1

2

Relationship to urban plan

Relationship to adjacent sites

Urban Presence

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

06 RELATIONSHIP TO


A-1

1: VIEW FROM CORNER OF MAPLE/LYTLE

2: VIEW FROM CORNER OF MAPLE/BURTON

1

2



Urban Presence

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

06 RELATIONSHIP TO


A-2



2



Urban Presence

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

06 RELATIONSHIP TO


A-2



1

2



Urban Presence

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

06 RELATIONSHIP TO


B-1



2



Urban Presence

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

06 RELATIONSHIP TO


B-1



1

2



Urban Presence

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

06 RELATIONSHIP TO


B-2



2



Urban Presence

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

06 RELATIONSHIP TO


B-2



1

2



Urban Presence

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

URBAN PLANNING

SITE CONTEXT

URBAN PRESENCE (MASSING)

URBAN PLANNING

SITE CONTEXT


URBAN PLANNING

SITE CONTEXT


URBAN PLANNING

SITE CONTEXT


06 RELATIONSHIP TO CONTEXTSCALE AND MASSING: SUMMARY

A-1 A-2 B-1 B-2

PUBLIC SPACE

A-1


PUBLIC SPACE: Orientation of the building creates left over

space in each scheme—we have evaluated the public space

based on the following criteria:

Relationship to urban space

Relationship to building entry

Scale

FUTURE

USE

ENTRY

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

PUBLIC SPACE

A-2



space in each scheme—we have evaluated this space based

on the following criteria:



Scale

FUTURE

USE

ENTRY

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

PUBLIC SPACE

B-1







Scale

ENTRY

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

PUBLIC SPACE

B-2







Scale

ENTRY

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

08 WORK ENVIRONMENTVIEWS – TYPICAL FLOORS 2-6

A-1 VIEWS – PUBLIC AREAS

VIEWS – RESTRICTED AREAS


BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

LYTLE STREET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

A-2 VIEWS – PUBLIC AREAS


08 WORK ENVIRONMENTVIEWS – TYPICAL FLOORS 2-6

B-1 VIEWS – PUBLIC AREAS



BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

LYTLE STREET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

BURTON STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

B-2 VIEWS – PUBLIC AREAS


NOON

JUN 21

DEC 21

NOON

SO

UTH

NO

RTH

08 WORK ENVIRONMENTDAYLIGHTING AND SOLAR RADIATION-SUN PATH

NOON

3PM

NOON

3PM

DEC 21

SUNRISE

JUN 21

SUNRISE

DEC 21

SUNSET

JUN 21

SUNSET

JUN 21

3PM

DEC 21

3PM

EA

ST

WE

ST

SOLAR ANGLE AT

SOUTH ELEVATION

SOLAR ANGLE AT

WEST ELEVATION

08 WORK ENVIRONMENT

Kwh/m2Jun 07 – Jul 07

B-1/B-2SOLAR RADIATION

A-1/A-2

DAYLIGHTING AND SOLAR IRRADIANCE--1kwh/m2 is equal to 1 hour of direct sunlight. The more direct

sunlight an area receives, the more heat gain accumulated in that space. It is important to achieve a

balance between daylight and heat gain. The graphic below looks at solar irradiance in each zone

during the summer months when it is most critical to control.

SOLAR RADIATION

-19% -19%- 55%

- 26 %

- 55%

MEAN kwh/m2 PER ZONE: A1/A2 B1/B2 DELTA

• RESTRICTED (CORNERS) 19%

• RESTRICTED (CHAMBERS) 55%

• COURT ROOMS 55%

• PUBLIC CORRIDOR 26%

- 55%

08 WORK ENVIRONMENTDAYLIGHTING AND GLARE-Glare is evaluated by measuring the contrast of light levels within a space.

While direct light can increase actual light levels, direct sunlight, which creates high contrast, needs to

be controlled.

A-1/A-2 GLARE

jan feb mar apr may jun jul aug sep oct nov dec


Tim

e o

f d

ay

Tim

e o

f d

ay

• For most of the

year, there is

glare in the

early morning

hours (6-8 am)

• For most of the

year, there is

some level of

“disturbing

glare” starting

around 1pm

and continuing

through the end

of the work day

• Western light is

very hard to

manage

08 WORK ENVIRONMENT

B-1/B-2

DAYLIGHTING AND GLARE-Glare is evaluated by measuring the contrast of light levels within a space.

While direct light can increase actual light levels, direct sunlight, which creates high contrast, needs to

be controlled.

GLARE



Tim

e o

f d

ay

Tim

e o

f d

ay

• No perceptible glare until after 6 PM

• Glare during the winter months

• Southern light easier to manage with

horizontal shading that does not

interfere with views





WAY-FINDING: 2ND FLOOR

VIEWS

DAYLIGHTING

SCALE AND MASSING

PUBLIC SPACE

EVALUATION SUMMARY

A-1 A-2 B-1 B-2CLERK OF COURT OPERATIONS





VIEWS

DAYLIGHTING

SCALE AND MASSING

PUBLIC SPACE






VIEWS

DAYLIGHTING

SCALE AND MASSING

PUBLIC SPACE






VIEWS

DAYLIGHTING

SCALE AND MASSING

PUBLIC SPACE

EVALUATION SUMMARY

A-2 B-2CLERK OF COURT OPERATIONS





VIEWS

DAYLIGHTING

SCALE AND MASSING

PUBLIC SPACE






VIEWS

DAYLIGHTING

SCALE AND MASSING

PUBLIC SPACE

B-2


BURTON STREET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

LYTLE STREET

BURTON STREET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

EVALUATION SUMMARY

is the recommended scheme because of the following:

• Lobby / Entry sequence is functional

• Orientation for views and daylighting provide better opportunity

• Public plaza creates an entry plaza as well as provides opportunity for urban green space

• Underground sally port configuration is efficient and secure

QUESTIONS / DISCUSSION


AGENDA










OBJECTIVES


Parking garage

LYTLE STREET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

GREEN SPACE

OPTION 1

Level GSF Spaces

1 36,780 120

2 36,780 122

3 36,780 122

4 23,896 74

134,336 438

GSF/space: 307

Parking garage

OPTION 2

Level GSF Spaces

1 38,490 132

2 49,410 154

3 40,998 89

128,898 375

GSF/space: 344

Level 1: 8,000 GSF RETAIL SPACE

LYTLE STREET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

RE

TA

IL S

PA

CE

8,0

00

GS

F



AGENDA










OBJECTIVES


Bridge connector

• Bridge connected at 2nd level of garage

• No direction connection to proposed courthouse due to security

concerns

• Bridge is open air

• Elevator and stair connections shown at all three corners

Murfreesboro Traffic Data

• Lytle Street: 2118 – 3311 cars

• Maple Street: 2408 -- 3577 cars

Nashville Traffic Data

• James Robertson Bridge: 25,330 cars

LYTLE STREET

CH

UR

CH

ST

RE

ET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

LYTLE STREET

MA

PLE

ST

RE

ET

JUDICIAL

CENTER SITE

CONNECTS AT

GARAGE CORE

LOCATION

GARAGE

LEVEL 2

Bridge connector

VIEW FROM MAPLE ST LOOKING NORTH

VIEW FROM LYTLE ST LOOKING EAST


NEXT STEPSDRC Meeting 03.18.2015

AGENDA

1. Developed floor plans for each level of preferred scheme

2. Visioning Session on exterior building aesthetics– “What does it look like?”

3. Revised parking garage layouts

4. Developed site plan

DISCUSSION ITEMS

1. Comments or questions about program items and functional relationships

for next stage of development

Documents

Rutherford County Judicial Centerrcsharepoint.rutherfordcountytn.gov/sites/pba/Judicial Building/15... · Review (4) Functional Plan Layouts • Sally Port configuration ... VIEWS