6
Russian derivatives regulations – developments and remaining challenges Andrei Murygin Partner 10 September 2013

Russian derivatives regulations – developments and remaining challenges

  • Upload
    ordell

  • View
    42

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Russian derivatives regulations – developments and remaining challenges. Andrei Murygin Partner 10 September 2013. Repositories – reporting and close-out netting. NSD and NP RTS announced availability of reporting facilities for repos and FX swaps – reportable from 5 November 2013 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Russian derivatives regulations – developments  and  remaining challenges

Russian derivatives regulations – developments and remaining challenges

Andrei Murygin

Partner

10 September 2013

Page 2: Russian derivatives regulations – developments  and  remaining challenges

2

Repositories – reporting and close-out netting

― NSD and NP RTS announced availability of reporting facilities for repos and FX swaps – reportable from 5 November 2013

― Impact: close out netting will become available for repos and swaps

― Announcement of reporting facility for DFIs and “other agreements involving securities and foreign currency” expected before November 2013

― Works as extension of transition period for reporting of derivatives and spot trades until July 2014

― Close out netting for derivatives will effectively be postponed too, unless both parties agree to report before statutory obligation arises

― Foreign banks’ reporting obligation – applicable?

Page 3: Russian derivatives regulations – developments  and  remaining challenges

3

Collateral

― “Contracts for payment of floating margin amounts” are included in the basic DFI list in the 2011 Russian Master Derivatives Documentation;

― 2011 Form of Margin Agreement - collateral is treated as a separate derivatives transaction

― FSFM proposes adding Credit Support Agreements into the list of DFIs

― Improves chances of inclusion of collateral in Close out Amount;

― Does it improve enforceability of collateral in the absence of statutory recognition of margin payments in the SML?

― Civil Code or SML changes necessary: timing unclear

Page 4: Russian derivatives regulations – developments  and  remaining challenges

4

Curing discrimination of foreign players - Civil code changes needed

― Article 1062 (2) : change is needed to ensure equal protection of derivatives with non-Russian professional counterparties

― November 2012 – Duma indefinitely postponed the proposed changes to the Civil Code

― Timing of such changes is uncertain

Page 5: Russian derivatives regulations – developments  and  remaining challenges

5

Court practice – adverse cases

― Unicredit case – 2013 repeat case of 2012 loss

― Easy fix: specific termination clauses can be dealt with in the documentation

― Larger impact: unpredictable interpretation of international-style provisions of Russian and ISDA derivatives documentation

― VAS discussions of possible clarifications on derivatives

― Possibility of adding termination if a professional party acted in bad faith

― Possibility of professional party’s disclosure obligation and suitability tests

Page 6: Russian derivatives regulations – developments  and  remaining challenges

6

Questions

?