EMR: Cambodia: Rural Roads Improvement Project - Semi-annual Report
(July-December 2012)CAM: Rural Roads Improvement Project Detailed
Design and Implementation Supervision (DDIS) Consulting
Services
Prepared by Korea Consultants International in association with
Filipinas Dravo Corporation for the Ministry of Rural Development,
the Kingdom of Cambodia, and the Asian Development Bank.
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 1 October 2014)
NOTE
In this report, "$" refers to US dollars unless otherwise
stated.
This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower.
The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of
ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be
preliminary in nature.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any
project, or by making any designation of or reference to a
particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian
Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the
legal or other status of any territory or area.
Currency unit – riel (KR) KR1.00 = $0.000245
$1.00 = KR4,085
SEMI-ANNUAL ENVIRONMENT MONITORING REPORT
October 2014
KOREA CONSULTANTS INTERNATIONAL in association with Filipinas Dravo
Corporation
KOREA CONSULTANTS INTERNATIONAL in association with PHILIP IN AS
DRA VO CORPORATION
Detailed Design and Implementation Supervision RURAL ROADS
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, ADB LOAN N0.2670-CAM (SF)
MINISTRY OF RUR . T nli',Tli'T n.nl\"'vM
RURAL~OAUS--PROVEMENT.
I""_M:V.Jt:\... . _ ... . DATE /01/0 !2ottj10 October 2014
RECD
H.E. Dr. CHAN Darong FILE 28c jOG ~If Director General for
Technical Affairs NO
Project Director DISTR'N ACTION INFO
Ministry of Rural Development Corner of Street 169 & Russian
Federation Blvd Phnom Penh, Cambod ta
Our Ref No. KCI -RRIP-14-236
Ref: Rural Roads Improvement Project: ADB Loan 2670-CAM (SF)
Subject:
Submission of Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Covering
the Period from January to June 2014
The DDIS consultants would like to submit herewith the semi-annual
environment monitoring report of the project for the period
covering six months from January to June 2014.
The International Environmental Specialist, Dr. David G. Lees with
national environment specialist conducted semi-annual environment
monitoring of the civil works from 25 September to 30 September
2014. During the monitoring with SEO, PDRD and Contractors,
checklists of EMP implementation for ongoing civil works contract
packages were reviewed and the inspection team made a confirmation
inspection to the project sites in order to ensure compliance with
Environment Management Plan of the Project and ADB's Safeguard
Policy Statement 2009.
Through the semi-annual environment monitoring on the ongoing civil
works sites of the Project, it has been evaluated there are no
adverse environmental issues associated with the project
implementation .
Sincerely yours,
KIM II Hwan Team Leader Detailed Design and Implementation
Supervision Korea Consultants International
Address: Corner of Street 169 & Russian Federation Blvd,. Phnom
Penh, Kingdom of Cambodia Tel : (855) 12 600 391, Fax: (855) 23 990
829 E-mail :
[email protected]
Korea Consultants International Rural Roads Improvement Project in
association with Filipinas Dravo Corp ADB Loan No. 2670-CAM
(SF)
i Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Jan-Jun 2014
CONTENTS
Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Introduction
....................................................................................................................
1 2 Environment Monitoring Mechanism
..............................................................................
3
2.1 Introduction
.............................................................................................................
3 2.2 Environmental Management Plan (EMP) and
CEMP............................................... 3 2.3
Environmental Monitoring Program
.........................................................................
3 2.4 Measurements
........................................................................................................
3 2.5 Timing of Monitoring
................................................................................................
4 2.6 Monitoring of CEMP by Checklists
..........................................................................
5 2.7 Establishment of SEO
.............................................................................................
5
3 Results of Monitoring
......................................................................................................
5 3.1 Contract CW-A: Kampong Thom, Siem Reap and Tboung Thom
............................ 6 3.2 Contract CW-B: Kampong Speu
& Kampong Chhnang ........................................... 6
3.3 Contract CW-C: Pursat and Battambang
................................................................. 6
3.4 Contract CW-D: Kampong Cham
............................................................................
8 3.5 Contract CW-E: Kampong
Cham............................................................................12
3.6 Contract CW-F: Kampong Cham
............................................................................14
4 Corrective Actions
.........................................................................................................18
5 Outstanding Issues
........................................................................................................18
6 Conclusion
....................................................................................................................18
Figures Figure 1 Start Point of 155 D scheme and earthworks under
way ................................... 6 Figure 2 Road 155D before
and after water spraying for dust suppression .....................
7 Figure 3 Beginning of DBST pavement
...........................................................................
7 Figure 4 Site camp provides bottled drinking water and toilets
........................................ 7 Figure 5 Empty drums and
used tyres to be removed from site.
..................................... 8 Figure 6 Embankment on 155C
waiting to be covered with vegetation ........................... 8
Figure 7 Beginning point of road and entrance to rubber plantation
................................ 9 Figure 8 Road passing through
rubber plantations
.......................................................... 9 Figure
9 Oil tank is bunded with kerb.
.............................................................................
9 Figure 10 Minor damage to kerb needs repair with tap fitting
...........................................10 Figure 11 Toilets for
men and women with circular concrete septic tank
..........................10 Figure 12 Flush water provided to
toilets which are cleaned every day ............................10
Figure 13 Clean cooking area and bottled drinking water
.................................................11 Figure 14 Rain
water capture system for washing, bathing and toilet flushing
..................11 Figure 15 Bitumen container and aggregate
washing plant area ......................................12 Figure
16 Worker showing height of flooding and future raised height of
KC10 road .......12 Figure 17 Beginning Point KC2 and new
trapezoidal side drain
.......................................13
Figure 18 School yard subject to water stagnation; resident showing
height of flood ........13
Figure 19 Rented camp was empty as major works are
completed..................................13 Figure 20 Empty
bitumen containers to be removed
........................................................14 Figure
21 Beginning Point of road with concrete pavement.
............................................14 Figure 22 Roads
congested at this point.
.........................................................................15
Figure 23 Empty and waste drums to be removed.
..........................................................15
Korea Consultants International Rural Roads Improvement Project in
association with Filipinas Dravo Corp ADB Loan No. 2670-CAM
(SF)
ii Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Jan-Jun 2014
Tables Table 1 List of Project Roads
............................................................................................
2 Table 2 Environmental Parameters Contract Packages CW-A, B, C, D,
E and F. ............16 Appendices Appendix A. Checklist of EMP
Implementation for Contract CW-A Appendix B. Checklist of EMP
Implementation for Contract CW-B Appendix C. Checklist of EMP
Implementation for Contract CW-C Appendix D. Checklist of EMP
Implementation for Contract CW-D Appendix E. Checklist of EMP
Implementation for Contract CW-E Appendix F. Checklist of EMP
Implementation for Contract CW-F
Korea Consultants International Rural Roads Improvement Project in
association with Filipinas Dravo Corp ADB Loan No. 2670-CAM
(SF)
iii Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Jan-Jun 2014
ABBREVIATIONS
ADB Asian Development Bank AP (Project) Affected Persons APL Angkor
Protected Landscape APSARA Authority for Protection and Management
of Angkor / Region of Siem Reap BOD biological oxygen demand COI
Corridor of Impact DBST double bituminous seal DDIS Detailed Design
and Implementation Supervision EIA environmental impact assessment
EMP Environmental Management Plan GoC Government of Cambodia GGF
Good Governance Framework GRM grievance redress mechanism IEE
Initial Environmental Examination KCI Korea Consultants
International KEXIM Korea Export and Import Bank MCFA Ministry of
Culture and Fine Arts MEF Ministry of Economy and Finance MOU
Memorandum of Understanding MRD Ministry of Rural Development MOE
Ministry of Environment MT motorized transport NDF Nordic
Development Fund NGO Non-government Organization NTFP non-timber
forest products PDRD Provincial Department of Rural Development PMU
Project Management Unit PPTA Project Preparation Technical
Assistance PSP Prasat Sambour Preikuk RGC Royal Government of
Cambodia ROW Right of Way RP Resettlement Plan SDR Special Drawing
Right SEO Social and Environment Office SPS ADB’s Safeguard Policy
Statement STD Sexually Transmitted Disease TOR Terms of Reference
UNESCO United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural
Organization WB World Bank UXO Unexploded Ordnance
Korea Consultants International Rural Roads Improvement Project in
association with Filipinas Dravo Corp ADB Loan No. 2670-CAM
(SF)
iv Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Jan-Jun 2014
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. The Rural Roads Improvement Project (RRIP) will be implemented
for a period of 5
years, from 2011 and will be completed in 2015. The Project has
five (5) key components,
namely: (i) improvement of 544.4 km of 22 project rural roads; this
was originally 19 roads,
but 3 extra roads (41.7 km) have been added later; (ii) improved
road asset management;
(iii) road safety and safeguards (iv) climate change adaptation and
(v) efficient project
management.
2. The roads will provide an all-year road access from provincial
towns and agricultural
areas, and will provide greater accessibility to basic facilities
and services. The Project will
also strengthen the capacity of the MRD to plan, manage and monitor
road maintenance
operations and implement the loan covenants and other conditions in
the loan package
including establishing and strengthening a Social and Environmental
Office (SEO) in MRD,
and increasing linkages and involving the Provincial Department
Rural Development (PDRD)
in project implementation and monitoring.
3. The Project is upgrading targeted existing unpaved rural roads
in eight provinces to
a paved road standard with double bituminous surface treatment
(DBST) without widening
or improving alignment. The Project is also improving drainage
structures such as box
culverts and pipe culverts, but reconstruction of bridges are
limited to existing wooden
bridges. The Project is classified as environment category B and an
initial environmental
examination (lEE) was conducted as part of project preparation in
accordance with ADB
Safeguard Policy Statement of 2009 (ADB SPS).
4. The civil works comprise the improvement of 22 existing roads
(541.923 km), earth or
gravel surfaced roads in seven provinces. The project is covered by
ADB Loan 2670-CAM
(SF) (Contract CW-B and Contract CW-C in four provinces of Kampong
Speu, Kampong
Chhnang, Pursat and Battambang started in Dec 2011) and Korea EXIM
Bank Loan KHM-11
(Contract CW-A in three provinces of Kampong Cham, Kampong Thom and
Siem Reap
started in January 2012). The three additional contracts, (CW-D,
CW-E and CW-F) in
Kampong Cham Province financed by ADB Loan 2670-CAM (SF), were
awarded in January
2014 and started in February 2014.
5. The International Environmental Specialist and national
environment specialist
conducted semi-annual environment monitoring of the civil works
between 25 September
and 30 September 2014. They reviewed the activities of the
contractors in the project sites in
order to ensure compliance with ADB’s Social Safeguard Policy
Statement 2009 and EMP.
They were accompanied by the SEO and PDRD staff of MRD and the DDIS
consultants and
the contractor’s representatives.
6. There are currently 7 staffs within SEO: 1 chief, 1
deputy-chief, 1 Resettlement, 2
Environment and 2 Gender officers. The SEO currently fully
effective in operation for
monitoring activities of civil works contractors in resettlement,
environment and gender
Korea Consultants International Rural Roads Improvement Project in
association with Filipinas Dravo Corp ADB Loan No. 2670-CAM
(SF)
v Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Jan-Jun 2014
mainstreaming. SEO implement monitoring jointly with the DDIS
consultant or independently
to check contractor’s activities. In the event of noncompliance
with EMP, SEO through PMU
may issue instructions to the contractors to comply with.
7. The CEMP is monitored and enforced by the DDIS Consultants who
use checklists
included in the EMP. By using the checklists consistency is
maintained between the various
packages. The checklists are compiled every month and the
checklists for all six contract
packages for the period from January to June 2014 were sighted and
reviewed by the
International Environmental Specialist. The checklists had been
filled in correctly and
reporting was thorough. No environmental issues were identified. No
complaints from
villagers were reported.
8. In order to confirm the environmental conditions of the project
roads, most of project
roads under construction were visited as being typical and site
surveys carried out. In
general environmental conditions were acceptable.
9. Contractors are required to provide PPEs to site workers. This
has been done.
10. All contractors are required to check that quarries supplying
materials have the
appropriate environmental permits from Ministry of Environment.
Some contractors are
using quarries owned by themselves. Permits issued by the Ministry
of Environment for
quarry operations were checked.
11. Following the semi-annual environment monitoring on the ongoing
civil works sites of
the Project by the international environment specialist and SEO of
MRD, at the present time
there are no adverse environmental issues associated with the
project implementation. One
workers camp site on Contract CW-D (KC-10 road) was being managed
in an exemplary
manner and could serve as an example to other contractors. Other
campsites should be
reminded to maintain good housekeeping. When working in congested
traffic situations,
attention should be paid to pedestrians walking close to machinery
particularly with regards
to children. Used bitumen drums should be returned to supplier when
empty. Several roads
are now completed and Checklist Number 11 - Construction Camps
Closure should be filled
in the next period. DDIS consultants together with SEO will
continue to inspect the sites
frequently and closely monitor the contractor’s field activities to
ensure compliance with the
requirements in the EMP and CEMP. Another review will take place
after 6 months.
Location Map of 3 new Contracts in Kampong Cham Province
Korea Consultants International Rural Roads Improvement Project in
association with Filipinas Dravo Corp ADB Loan No. 2670-CAM
(SF)
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 1 Jan-Jun 2014
1.0 Introduction
1. As the remote rural economy is becoming increasingly dependent
on the improved national road network, the rural road network
continues to deteriorate due to lack of adequate road maintenance,
combined with rapidly growing traffic, lack of maintenance
financing, poor road maintenance standards, inadequate
institutional capacity in road maintenance and management, lack of
private contractor capacity, and design and construction
deficiencies. 2. The Rural Roads Improvement Project (RRIP) will be
implemented for a period of 5 years, from 2011 and will be
completed in 2015. The Project has five (5) key components, namely:
(i) improvement of 544.4 km of 22 project rural roads; this was
originally 19 roads, but 3 extra roads (41.7 km) have been added
later; (ii) improved road asset management; (iii) road safety and
safeguards (iv) climate change adaptation and (v) efficient project
management. 3. The Rural Roads Improvement Project (RRIP) will be
implemented in selected rural roads in 7 provinces of Cambodia,
namely: (i) Kampong Speu, (ii) Kampong Chhnang, (iii) Pursat (iv)
Battambang, (v) Siem Reap (vi) Kampong Thom and (vii) Kampong Cham.
The project is covered by ADB Loan 2670-CAM (SF) (Contract CW-B and
Contract CW-C in four provinces of Kampong Speu, Kampong Chhnang,
Pursat and Battambang started in Dec 2011) and Korea EXIM Bank Loan
KHM-11 (Contract CW-A in three provinces of Kampong Cham, Kampong
Thom and Siem Reap started in January 2012). The three additional
contracts, (CW-D, CW-E and CW-F) in Kampong Cham Province financed
by ADB Loan 2670-CAM (SF), were awarded in January 2014 and started
in February 2014. It will continue through until May 2015. The new
roads are included in this assessment. The ongoing civil works
comprise the improvement of 22 existing earth or gravel surfaced
roads in the seven provinces to a bitumen sealed standard using a
double bituminous surface treatment (DBST), including placement as
necessary of sub-base and road base, using unbound materials for
the road pavement. In some cases the elevation of the road is being
raised as protection against currently occurring flooding. This
also reflects future climate change related environmental
factors.
4. The project is expected to benefit about 560,000 beneficiaries
residing in the areas covered by the project with the Ministry of
Rural Development (MRD) as the Executing Agency (EA). The road will
provide an all-year road access from provincial towns and
agricultural areas, and will provide greater accessibility to basic
facilities and services. It will also strengthen the capacity of
the MRD to plan, manage and monitor road maintenance operations and
implement the loan covenants and other conditions in the loan
package. A Social and Environmental Office (SEO) has been
established in MRD and this will be strengthened during the
project. It is also intended to further involve the Provincial
Department Rural Development (PDRD) in project implementation and
monitoring.
5. The Project will upgrade targeted existing unpaved rural roads
in eight provinces to a paved road standard with double bituminous
surface treatment (DBST) without widening or changing alignment.
The Project will also improve drainage structures such as box
culverts and pipe culverts, but reconstruction of bridges is
limited to existing wooden bridges. No new roads will be built. The
Project is classified as environment category B and an initial
environmental examination (lEE) was conducted as part of project
preparation in accordance with ADB Safeguard Policy Statement of
2009 (ADB SPS). The list of project roads is shown in Table
1.
Korea Consultants International Rural Roads Improvement Project in
association with Filipinas Dravo Corp ADB Loan No. 2670-CAM
(SF)
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 2 Jan-Jun 2014
Table 1. List of Project Roads
Contract Province Road No. District(s) Name of Road Length
(km)
CW-A
266E Puok- Angkor Chum Puok- Angkor Chum 29.5
Kampong Thom 2620/2KT2 Prasat Sambour & Sandan Prasat Sambour –
Sandan 66.0
Kampong Cham
370 Tboung Khmum-Ou Reang Ov Cheung Lang -Ou Reang Ov 29.4
371 Krouch Chhmar Peus Pir-Kdol Leu 21.2
373C/373C1 Memot National Road 7-Kabbas 17.3
CW-B
Phsar Trapeang Kraloeng-Phsar Pangkassei
Kampong Chhnang
1KCH2 Rolea B'ier - Tuek Phos Phsar Pongro - Ra Krang Skear
25.2
151C Sameakki Mean Chey Phsar Trach-Phnom Prah Theat 35.0
1KCH3 Sameakki Mean Chey Spean Pou - Ra Mean Nor 12.4
CW-C
Pursat
154D Bakan Boeng Khnar-MeToeuk 9.6
155C Kravanh Trapaing Chorng - Phtas Rung 22.3
155D Bakan Boeng Khnar-Taluo 19.4
1PS2 Bakan Samraong - Talou 18.7
Battambang
1BB2 Moung Ruessei-Rukhakiri NR5 – Prek Chik – Chong Por 23.6
1BB3 & 1BB4 Moung Ruessei Chrey - Taloas Kakoah 23.9
CW-D Kg. Cham KC10 Tboung Khmum & Kroch Chmar Pong Teuk-Wat
Chhuk 15.1
CW-E Kg. Cham KC2 Steung Trang Hanchey-Steung Trang 10.0
CW-F Kg. Cham KC11 Batheay Phsar Paav -Trab 16.7
Total 7 Province 22 Roads 24 Districts 544.4
Korea Consultants International Rural Roads Improvement Project in
association with Filipinas Dravo Corp ADB Loan No. 2670-CAM
(SF)
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 3 Jan-Jun 2014
2 Environment Monitoring Mechanism
2.1 Introduction
6. The International Environmental Specialist, Dr David G. Lees and
national environment specialist, Mr. Khum Thoeun, were mobilized
for semi-annual environment monitoring of the civil works between
25th September and 30th September 2014. They reviewed the
activities of the contractors on the project sites in order to
ensure compliance with ADB’s Social Safeguard Policy Statement
2009. They were accompanied by the staff of the SEO of MRD, PDRD
staff of MRD, the DDIS consultants and the contractor’s
representatives. 2.2 Environmental Management Plan (EMP) and
CEMP
7. An EMP (Environmental Management Plan) was included in the
bidding documents of civil works during the procurement stage. The
contractors were required to consider the requirements of the EMP
when submitting their bids as the conditions in the EMP become
contractually binding on the contractors. 8. The EMP included in
the bidding documents is, of necessity, general in scope. This is
because specific details such as location of contractors camps,
borrow areas, rock sources, crushing plants and the like are not
known at the bidding stage. These details must be supplied by the
contractor in his CEMP – Contractors Environmental Management Plan.
All contractors had previously supplied a CEMP. No updates to the
CEMP had taken place and were not considered necessary. For the new
roads CEMPs had been submitted. 2.3 Environmental Monitoring
Program
9. The Environmental Monitoring Program is included in the
Environmental Management Plan and so the EMP can be considered as
an EMMP - Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan.
10. The essence of monitoring is to ensure compliance with
environmental legislation. The contractors have a duty to comply
with the relevant legislation. The DDIS consultant must check their
activities and report to MRD. In the event of noncompliance with
EMP, MRD can instruct the contractor to comply. Given the nature of
the work activities most monitoring is based on visual
observations. 2.4 Measurements
11. It may be necessary to carry out measurements to establish if
the regulations are being met. There will be a “hierarchy” of
monitoring and measurements. This would be based on measurements
being made by persons in the following order:
Contractors
SEO environmental staff from MRD
Ministry of Environment (MOE would only be involved if an official
complaint was made to them)
12. Initially, contractors are required to check daily that all
operations are being conducted correctly. In general “good
housekeeping” must be employed. If contractor’s camps are
established, then overflowing of septic tanks must be checked by
visual inspection. Dust must be controlled by covering of
stockpiles and water sprays. Solid waste,
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 4 Jan-Jun 2014
engine oil and grease, must be taken away by waste removal
contractors and records kept. For road construction operations,
lack of dust suppression and noise control are usually the main
sources of potential nuisance if activities take place near
residential dwellings. Crusher plants and borrow areas can also be
sources of noise and dust. Inspection of borrow areas should also
include borrow roads used by contractors vehicles. After extraction
from borrow areas is finished, reinstatement must be carried out.
Warning signs must be erected to avoid drowning if deep ponds are
left. Inspectors and SEO staff must make regular checks by visual
inspection. 13. Construction supervision inspectors are making
daily spot checks and weekly formal checks on site operations. They
check all of the above and view records for waste disposal. They
must also investigate any pollution incidents or complaints. They
are using checklists for record purposes and ensure that any
complaints or incident are brought to the notice of the contractor
immediately, verbally and with a follow up written notice. 14.
Initial monitoring is based on visual inspection and site
assessment. Measurements require specialist equipment and this is
only needed if a significant incident occurs. Normally,
implementation of “Good Housekeeping” and the contractor
demonstrating a responsible attitude are sufficient to ensure an
environmentally satisfactory operation. 15. If vibration
measurements or dust measurements are required then specialized
equipment will be needed. The responsibility for requesting the
measurements will be the consultant’s. SEO will liaise with MOE and
DOE to arrange the measurements. MOE have vibration equipment for
measurement of traffic and blasting vibrations. So far no
specialized monitoring equipment has been needed. 16. If dust
measurements are needed than a two stage process must be adopted. A
high volume sampler (HVS) will be deployed by MOE. After a suitable
period, usually 24 hours, the filter in the HVS will be retrieved
by MOE staff and transported to the laboratory for the second stage
which is analysis. This requires highly specialized equipment which
MOE possess in Phnom Penh. The MOE will charge for this service.
These charges must be covered by the contractor. 17. The results
must be submitted to SEO who will interpret them with respect to
the relevant regulations. Discussions must then be held between
SEO, the consultants’ inspectors and the contractor to determine
how to resolve any problems. 2.5 Timing of Monitoring
18. The timing of the monitoring is important. The following list
is for guidance and is indicative only.
Liquid emissions from sites must be checked every three months or
after heavy rain if overflowing is reported. Measurements in
streams and water courses must be made.
Dust emissions on site must be checked weekly by visual inspection
and monthly by examining records of water spraying. Ambient air
quality must be checked over a 24 hour continuous period at
sensitive receptors in the event of complaints.
Noise levels must be checked at site perimeters in the event of a
complaint, at night as well as during the daytime.
Correct removal and disposal of food waste and waste engine oil and
grease must be checked weekly by visual inspection of the camps and
checking of records from the waste disposal contractors.
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 5 Jan-Jun 2014
Noise and vibration must be checked at sensitive receptors if
blasting occurs or in the event of complaint. Before blasting
commences warning notices must be posted to local residents.
Reinstatement of borrow pits and quarries must be checked after
closure of the facility. 19. In addition to regular monitoring,
unannounced spot checks must be made by SEO on contractors
operations. All of the above procedures should be carried out by
the site inspectors, in conjunction with SEO, and where appropriate
MOE/ DOE. The results should be formally recorded every week and
compiled into a monthly report. This should be submitted to the
Engineer, the Chief Resident Engineer and discussed with SEO and
the contractors as necessary but at a minimum on a monthly basis.
Monthly reports are being compiled into semi-annual reports for
submission to ADB. 2.6 Monitoring of CEMP by Checklists
20. The CEMP is monitored and enforced by the Supervision
Consultants inspectors who use Checklists included in the EMP. By
using the checklists consistency is maintained between the various
packages. The checklists are compiled every month and the
checklists for all Contract Packages CW-A, CW-B, CW-C, CW-D, CW-E
and CW-F for January to June 2014 for CW-A through CW-C and March
to June 2014 for CW-D through CW-F respectively were sighted and
reviewed by the International Environmental Specialist. The
checklists had been filled in correctly and reporting was thorough.
No significant environmental issues were identified. Dust from
roads was commented upon during dry patches but was not a
significant issue and was remedied by increased frequency of water
sprays. During the rainy season it ceases to be an issue. No noise
complaints had been received. No further remedial works were
required at the time of the inspections. No complaints from
villagers were reported. Where possible contractors rent local
houses for their workers rather than establishing camps. This is
easier for them and avoids issues over sanitation and water supply.
This approach is actively encouraged and appears to be working
well. The contractors of CW-D, CW-E and CW-F have adopted this
approach as the scales of contract are rather small and the
construction period is only 15 months. 2.7 Establishment of
SEO
21 There is now 7 staff within SEO: 1 Chief, 1 Vice chief, 1
Resettlement, 2 Environment and 2 Gender persons. It is considered
that this now makes them effective. SEO can act together with the
DDIS consultant or independently to check contractor’s activities.
In the event of noncompliance with EMP, SEO as part of MRD can
instruct the contractor to comply. During the environmental
inspections by the International Environmental Expert the SEO
accompanied the team and so gained On the Job Training. When
workers camp sites were visited the SEO was asked to do the initial
environmental audit, present the results and observations, and then
a discussion was held. They are improving in their skills and are
being encouraged to carry out inspections on their own and submit
the results to the IES for review.
3 Results of Monitoring
22. In order to confirm the environmental assessments done by
checklist, site visits were made to several selected roads by the
International Environmental Specialist accompanied by staff from
MRD / SEO. Observations are given below.
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 6 Jan-Jun 2014
3.1 Contract CW-A: Kampong Cham, Kampong Thom and Siem Reap
23. A meeting was held with the DDIS Team leader of EDCF
co-financed contract CW-A, and the team leader confirmed that the
majority of project roads have been completed. Only one road
2620/2KT2 was still under construction of DBST paving works. No
sites visits were necessary. Site closure checklists are required
to be completed for the Project Completion Report. 3.2 Contract
CW-B: Kampong Speu & Kampong Chhnang
24. The DDIS team leader confirmed that all project roads have been
completed. No sites visits were necessary. Site closure has been
checked during the taking-over inspection in July 2014. 3.3
Contract CW-C: Pursat and Battambang
25. Under this contract one road 1BB1 has been completed up to for
DBST pavement. This is the longest road among the four roads in
Battambang. There are still some remaining works for road furniture
such as traffic signs, guide posts and road marking. The roads and
slopes are cleaned and there is no environment issue.
26. Roads 1BB3 and 1BB4 are contiguous and can be considered as one
road. As these roads were visited in the last semi-annual review
they were not visited on this occasion. In Pursat Province road
155D runs south from NR5 for 19.4kms and then becomes road 1PS2 for
18.7kms. A spur from 1PS2 designated 155C of length 22.3kms runs
back to NR5. A camp site is located near the end point of 155C.
Toilets were installed, and oil tank was properly separated from
other facilities managed. There were some used oil drums, and the
inspection team asked the contractor to remove from the camp site.
Inspection photos of CW-C are shown in Figure 1 through Figure
6.
Figure 1 Start Point of 155 D scheme and earthworks under way
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 7 Jan-Jun 2014
Figure 2 Road 155D before and after water spraying for dust
suppression
Figure 3 Beginning of DBST pavement
Figure 4 Site camp provides bottled drinking water and
toilets
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 8 Jan-Jun 2014
Figure 5 Empty drums and used tyres to be removed from the
site.
Figure 6 Embankment on 155C waiting to be covered with vegetation
27. There are no environmental issues associated with roads 155C,
155D and 1PS2. The general housekeeping of the works camp should be
improved and waste drums and other waste materials removed, not
left standing in the open where they are exposed to rain and may
leak. 28. The embankments are bare earth and are vulnerable to soil
erosion in heavy rain. This is a waste of embankment material and
can block drains. Contractors should be encouraged to plant
vegetation strips as soon as possible and practical. 3.4 Contract
CW-D: Kampong Cham
29. Road KC10 of 15 km length is being constructed under Contract
CW-D. The road KC10, the workers camp and an extension of works to
the road were inspected.
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 9 Jan-Jun 2014
Figure 7 Beginning point of road and entrance to rubber
plantation
Figure 8 Road passing through rubber plantations 30. No
environmental issues were observed on the road. 31. The workers
camp site is located on a narrow piece of land between residential
properties. Good use has been made of the available space and in
general the site displays a high standard of housekeeping. The land
is rented and will be vacated in May 2015.
Figure 9 Oil tank is bunded with kerb.
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 10 Jan-Jun
2014
Figure 10 Minor damage to kerb needs repair with tap fitting
Figure 11 Toilets for men and women with circular concrete septic
tank
Figure 12 Flush water provided to toilets which are cleaned every
day
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 11 Jan-Jun
2014
Figure 13 Clean cooking area and bottled drinking water 32. The
fuel tank is mounted on a frame above a concrete base. The manifold
outlet is located above a kerbed area to contain minor spills. This
complies with the requirements of the CEMP. Some minor damage has
occurred to the brick kerb and this needs repairing and a tap
installed to release rain water but hold back any spilled oil. 33.
The contractor has provided separate toilets for men and women. A
concrete septic tank has been installed. These are cleaned every
day and flushing water provided. The kitchen area was well
maintained and clear of any vermin or waste. Bottled water is
provided for drinking purposes. A rain water capture system has
been installed for washing, bathing and toilet flushing.
Figure 14 Rain water capture system for washing, bathing and toilet
flushing 34. This workers camp is complying with the CEMP and an
excellent standard of environmental management is being achieved.
The contractor and the KCI inspector are to be complimented on
their efforts. The inspector stated that he had worked on previous
contract package of CW-C in Pursat and had transferred lessons
learned from there. The contractor stated that he had bought some
material such as sanitary fittings from the market and employed a
local builder for some tasks. For other tasks he had supplied his
own labor. 35. No environmental issues were observed on the site.
This site could be used as a good teaching example to other
contractors.
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 12 Jan-Jun
2014
36. The bitumen storage area was visited. There were no spills of
bitumen and the site was clean.
Figure 15 Bitumen container and aggregate washing plant area 37. A
section of road to the north of the bitumen camp will be raised due
to this year's severe flooding due to increase of Mekong River
water level. This was observed from the point of view of climate
change. No environmental issues were observed on this road
section.
Figure 16 Worker showing height of flooding and future raised
height of KC10 road 3.5 Contract CW-E: Kampong Cham
38. Road KC2 of length 10kms is nearing completion. A section of
concrete trapezoidal side drain has been constructed on one side to
control drainage.
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 13 Jan-Jun
2014
Figure 17 Beginning Point KC2 and new trapezoidal side drain 39. A
parallel road and adjoining school are subject to flooding due to
Mekong River overflow and so to alleviate this extra cross drainage
is needed to be provided on KC2. Two pipe and three box culverts
are planned and the construction is expected to start after
approval of variation for additional drainage. There are no
environmental issues associated with this road.
Figure 18 School yard subject to water stagnation; resident showing
height of flood 40. There is no construction camp for this section,
the workers are housed in rented houses at the ends of the road
section. The DBST is nearly finished and so the bitumen storage
area was visited.
Figure 19 Rented camp was empty as major works are completed.
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 14 Jan-Jun
2014
Figure 20 Empty bitumen containers to be removed 41. Empty
containers were laid in the open. They should be stored under the
shed out of the rain until they can be removed. Contaminated soil
should be collected and removed. Bulk containers should be removed
and returned to the supplier. 42. No other environmental issues
were observed. The contractor’s activities were considered
acceptable. 3.6 Contract CW-F: Kampong Cham
43. Road KC 11 is of length 16.7kms and runs north from NR6. The
works will be completed in April 2015. 44. A concrete pavement has
been constructed for the first 500m through the market area. Then
the road becomes DBST.
Figure 21 Beginning Point of road with concrete pavement. 45. In
the town centre the road is narrow and traffic is congested. Care
must be taken to keep heavy plant and machinery away from residents
particularly children. This is a standard CEMP policy and the
contractors were reminded of this.
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 15 Jan-Jun
2014
Figure 22 Roads congested at this point. 46. The contractor’s camp
was inspected. This will be used until January 2015. In general
housekeeping needs to be improved. Waste drums and empty containers
were being kept on the site. These should be removed when
empty.
Figure 23 Empty and waste drums to be removed. 47. No other
environmental issues were observed. The contractor’s activities
must be monitored for the remaining four months of the contract to
ensure they are acceptable. 3.5 Review of Environmental
Parameters
48. Environment parameters were checked and reviewed for six
contract packages. All civil works have been evaluated satisfactory
and no environmental issues were found. The review of results on
environmental parameters of each contract package are shown in
Table 2.
Korea Consultants International Rural Roads Improvement Project in
association with Filipinas Dravo Corp ADB Loan No. 2670-CAM
(SF)
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 16 Jan-Jun
2014
Table 2 Environmental Parameters Contract Packages CW-A, B, C, D, E
and F.
Regulation Environmental
General requirements ADB Social Safeguards Policy Statement
2009
Completed. EMP included in Tender Documents issued to
contractors.
Completed. EMP included in Tender Documents issued to
contractors.
Completed. EMP included in Tender Documents issued to
contractors.
Completed. EMP included in Tender Documents issued to
contractors.
Completed. EMP included in Tender Documents issued to
contractors.
Completed. EMP included in Tender Documents issued to
contractors.
ADB requirement
Submission of CEMP from contractor to MRD
Specific details must be supplied by contractor on construction
camps, borrow areas and roads, quarries, crushing and screening
plants.
ADB Social Safeguards Policy Statement 2009
Submitted by contractor. 5 of 6 roads completed.
Submitted by contractor. All works completed.
Submitted by contractor. 1 road completed.
Submitted by contractor. Completion Q2 2015
Submitted by contractor. Completion Q2 2015
Submitted by contractor. Completion Q1 2015
EMP requirement
Monthly Checklists
As per individual checklists given in EMP
Checklists completed by consultant’s inspectors for January to June
2014. Checklists sighted and confirmed to be in order. No
environmental issues identified.
Checklists completed by consultant’s inspectors for January to June
2014. Checklists sighted and confirmed to be in order. No
environmental issues identified.
Checklists completed by consultant’s inspectors for January to June
2014. Checklists sighted and confirmed to be in order. No
environmental issues identified.
Checklists completed by consultant’s inspectors for January to June
2014. Checklists sighted and confirmed to be in order. No
environmental issues identified.
Checklists completed by consultant’s inspectors for January to June
2014. Checklists sighted and confirmed to be in order. No
environmental issues identified.
Checklists completed by consultant’s inspectors for January to June
2014. Checklists sighted and confirmed to be in order. No
environmental issues identified.
Sub-decree on Water Pollution Control
Water Quality BOD < 50mg/L No visual evidence was sighted of
impacts on water quality. No spills were observed. There are no
major water courses near project roads. No remedial action is
required. No sampling or measurements of water.
No visual evidence was sighted of impacts on water quality. No
spills were observed. There are no major water courses near project
roads. No remedial action is required. No sampling or measurements
of water.
No visual evidence was sighted of impacts on water quality. No
spills were observed. There are no major water courses near project
roads. No remedial action is required. No sampling or measurements
of water.
No visual evidence was sighted of impacts on water quality. No
spills were observed. There are no major water courses near project
roads. No remedial action is required. No sampling or measurements
of water.
No visual evidence was sighted of impacts on water quality. No
spills were observed. There are no major water courses near project
roads. No remedial action is required. No sampling or measurements
of water.
No visual evidence was sighted of impacts on water quality. No
spills were observed. There are no major water courses near project
roads. No remedial action is required. No sampling or measurements
of water.
SS < 50mg/L
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 17 Jan-Jun
2014
Regulation Environmental
Air Quality TSP < 0.33 mg/m 3
No major air quality issues identified. Dust suppression on roads
improved by more water spraying. Minor noise issues cured by
controlling speed of vehicles.
No major air quality issues identified. Dust suppression on roads
improved by more water spraying. Minor noise issues cured by
controlling speed of vehicles.
No major air quality issues identified. Dust suppression on roads
improved by more water spraying. Minor noise issues cured by
controlling speed of vehicles.
No major air quality issues identified. Dust suppression on roads
improved by more water spraying.
No major air quality issues identified. Dust suppression on roads
improved by more water spraying.
No major air quality issues identified. Dust suppression on roads
improved by more water spraying.
Noise Quality Leq 75dB(A)
No blasting taking place
No blasting taking place
No blasting taking place
No blasting taking place
No blasting taking place
Sub-decree on Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Food Waste Properly Removed Workers camps acceptable.
Attention to be given to oil storage and handling.
Workers camps phased out by local recruitment of workers. Attention
to be given to oil storage and handling.
Workers camps phased out by local recruitment of workers. Attention
to be given to oil storage and handling.
Workers camps in good condition. Waste bitumen containers on
separate site need to be removed.
Workers lodged in rented village houses. Waste bitumen containers
on separate site need to be removed.
Workers camps need to improve housekeeping.
Liquid Waste Waste Oil, Grease Properly Controlled After Removed by
Subcontractor
No Regulation Septic Tank Smell, Sewage No Smell, No
Overflowing
Workers camps acceptable. Where possible houses are being rented
rather than setting up camps.
Workers camps acceptable. Where possible houses are being rented
rather than setting up camps.
Workers camps acceptable. Where possible houses are being rented
rather than setting up camps.
Circular concrete tank from market working well.
Not applicable. Workers camps acceptable.
No Regulation Borrow Pits Condition of Borrow Pits
Filled after Project Completion, Topsoil resurfaced
No issues identified.
No issues identified.
No issues identified.
No issues identified.
No issues identified.
No issues identified.
No Regulation Borrow Pits Depth of Borrow pits No Drowning
Hazard
No issues identified
No issues identified
No issues identified.
No issues identified.
No issues identified.
No complaints from residents
No issues identified
No issues identified
No issues identified
No issues identified.
No issues identified.
No issues identified.
No Regulation Trees if Cut Number of Trees Tree Replanted Not
applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not
applicable Not applicable
Korea Consultants International Rural Roads Improvement Project in
association with Filipinas Dravo Corp ADB Loan No. 2670-CAM
(SF)
Semi-Annual Environment Monitoring Report Page 18 Jan-Jun
2014
4 Corrective Actions
48. All Corrective Actions were implemented and the contractors are
complying with the CEMP.
5 Outstanding Issues
49. There is no outstanding issue involved in environmental
management.
6 Conclusion
50. Following the semi-annual environment monitoring on the ongoing
civil works sites of the Project by the international environment
specialist and national environment specialist together with SEO of
MRD, at the present time there are no adverse environmental issues
associated with the project implementation. One workers camp site
on KC-10 (CW-D) was being managed in an exemplary manner and could
serve as an example to other contractors. Other campsites should be
reminded to maintain good housekeeping. When working in congested
traffic situations attention should be paid to pedestrians walking
close to machinery particularly with regards to children. Used
bitumen drums should be returned to supplier when empty. Several
roads are now completed and Checklist Number 11 - Construction
Camps Closure should be filled in the next period. DDIS consultants
together with SEO will continue to inspect the sites frequently and
closely monitor the contractor’s field activities to ensure
compliance with the requirements in the EMP and CEMP. Another
review will take place after 6 months.
CHECK LIST OF EMP IMPLEMENTATION
January 2014
Road 2620
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLISTS
ROAD 2620
CHECKLIST 1 CONSTRUCTION CAMPS
(N.B. THERE IS NO SPECIFIC REGULATION FOR THIS ACTIVITY. "GOOD
HOUSEKEEPING" MUST BE OBSERVED AND "GENERAL INDUSTRY PRACTICE"
FOLLOWED)
PROJECT SITE: PACKAGE A
OBSERVER:
FREQUENCY: CHECK WEEKLY DURING PREPARATION OF CAMP, AT OPENING OF
CAMP, THEN WEEKLY OR IN RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT.
DATE: 27.01.2014 I TIME: 10:00AM
LOCATION I ROAD DISTANCE: RN 2620 59.8KM WEATHER CONDITION:
FINE
CHECKLIST QUESTION YES NO ADDITIONAL DATA NEEDS
Is the camp I yard located in a protected area, next to a community
0 0 0 water source or any other ecologically or otherwise sensitive
area?
If yes, comment on the adverse impacts on the environment:
Is the camp I yard being properly maintained? 0 0 0 If no, list
what is not being done properly:
Is the wastewater being disposed of properly? [3 0 0 If no, comment
on how it is being disposed and what are the impacts:
If no, comment on. Have septic tanks been installed? Are they
working correctly, that is not overflowing, or emitting
smell?
Is the solid waste being disposed off properly? C~l 0 0
If no, comment on how it is being disposed and the impacts of such
disposal:
Is attention being paid to "good housekeeping"? ~ 0 0
If no, comment on what is not being done:
·-
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-1 1 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Are the contractor's vehicles being maintained at the campsite I
yard?
---;-:;------···--··--· -----------------------·-----·-··----------
--·----··-·--· ----- ------·--------- If yes, are appropriate
precaution taken to avoid water and land contamination?
Is the waste from vehicle maintenance being disposed off properly?
6a 0 0 If no, comment on how it is bei disposed:
Is the fuel storage area properly surfaced and has a containment
kerb around it? 0 0 If no, comment on how the surrounding area is
being affected:
Are occupational health and hygiene precautions being taken? 0 0 0
If no, comment on where they are being neglected:
Does the community have any issues with the camp? 0 0 0 If yes,
what are the issues?
Any additional comments:
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHECKLIST 2 BORROW PITS I QUARRIES
(N.B. THERE IS NO SPECIFIC REGULATION FOR THIS ACTIVITY)
PROJECT SITE: PACKAGE A
OBSERVER:
FREQUENCY: CHECK WEEKLY DURING PREPARATION OF BORROW PIT, AT
OPENING, THEN WEEKLY OR IN RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT.
DATE: 27.01.2014 I TIME:09:30AM
WEATHER CONDITION: FINE
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Is the borrow pit I quarry located in a protected area, next to a
community water source or any other ecologically or otherwise 0 0 0
sensitive area?
If yes, comment on the adverse impacts on the environment:
Is the borrow pit I quarry being properly maintained? 0 0 0 If no,
state what is not being done :
Is there adverse visual impact due to the borrow pit? 0 t1 0 If
yes, comment how:
Is borrow pits I quarries excavation I mining adequately employing
drainage and fill methodology to avoid any water pools formation 0
0 during rains?
If no, comment:
Is the borrow pits I quarry properly rehabilitated at least
partially w 0 0 before the start of the rainy season?
If no, comment on what needs to be done:
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Are there any signs of erosion and instability? 0 g 0
Check list of EMP Implementation
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
If yes, what seems to be the reason?
Are the cut faces stabilized with appropriate materials and
methods? M 0 0 If no, what are the impacts?
Is the borrow pit I quarry to be closed and rehabilitated? 0 _[4 0
If yes, is there a closure plan?
Are the borrow pit I quarry operations creating excessive dust I
noise? 0 0 0 If yes, are any measures being taken to minimize dust
and noise?
Do the communities have any concerns I issues with borrow pit
I
0 B~ 0 quarry during operation or after closure?
If yes, what are those concerns I issues?
Any additional comments:
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHECKLIST 3 EROSION OF SLOPES
(N.B. THERE IS NO SPECIFIC REGULATION FOR THIS ACTIVITY)
PROJECT SITE:PACKAGE A
DATE: 27.01.2014 I TIME:10:00AM
WEATHER CONDITION:FINE
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
What is I are the reason(s) for erosion /landslides I
instability?
Improper design I stripping of cut faces 0 B 0 Improper drainage 0
0 0 Clearing of vegetation /lack of gabions, geotextiles 0 EJ 0
Improper leveling after earth removal 0 @ 0 Are the slopes properly
stabilized before the start of the rainy g 0 0 season?
Inadequate water channel diversion, or 0 El 0 A combination of some
of the reasons above
0 0 Is remedial action required? D_ B 0 If yes, comment:
Did the erosion /landslide I instability cause any damage? 0 [3 0
If yes, what was the nature of the damage?
Did the contractor take appropriate mitigatory measures, pre and B
0 0 post erosion I instability /landslides, to avoid I counter the
problem? '
If no, why did the contractor not consider it necessary to take
appropriate mitigatory measures?
Was the erosion brought to the notice of appropriate authorities by
0 0 0 the communities?
If yes, was there any action taken?
If no, why was action not taken?
p,Jn (~~i?l) C,i!t\!'1 Any additional comments:
fllYI
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHECKLIST 4 AIR POLLUTION
(N.B. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CARRY OUT HIS ACTIVITIES TO ENSURE
COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS STATED IN DRAFT SUB DECREE ON AIR
AND NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL)
PROJECT SITE PAC:I<.AGE A
OBSERVER:
DATE: 27.01.2014 I TIME: 11:00AM
LOCATION I ROAD DISTANCE: RN 2620 59.8KM
WEATHER CONDITION:FINE
Checklist question
What is the nature of air pollution?
dust from road s dust from stock piled materials 0 generator,
batching plant emissions 0 Vehicular emissions 0 Checklist question
Yes No Additional
data needs Is the problem significant enough to warrant attention?
0 B 0 If yes, did the contractor take appropriate measure to
mitigate the problem?
what is I are the measures taken?
Periodic water sprays on road surface I borrow pits 0 Vehicle tire
washing facilities at borrow pits and other locations 0 Speed limit
enforced on project vehicles 0 Vehicles speeding checked by posting
signs on roads, and awareness raising of 0 staff and local
communities 0 Covering of stock piled materials 0 Vehicles
regularly maintained 0 Equipment regularly maintained 0 Is air
pollution creating problems for the surrounding communities? 0 0 0
If yes, what type of problems?
0
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHECKLIST 5 WATER POLLUTION
(N.B. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CARRY OUT HIS ACTIVITIES TO ENSURE
COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS STATED IN SUB DECREE ON WATER
POLLUTION CONTROL, NO. 27 ANRK.BK, APRIL 06, 1999)
PROJECT SITE:PACKAGE A
OBSERVER:
FREQUENCY: CHECK WEEKLY OR IN RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT. DATE:
27.01.2014 I TIME:1 :30PM
LOCATION I ROAD DISTANCE: RN 2620 59.8KM
WEATHER CONDITION:FINE
Checklist question
What is the nature of water contamination? 1.1 surface water
(stream, pond etc.}
disposal of cut spoil into water body or on slope leading to water
body B discharge of wastewater from camp into fresh water body road
run-off into water body Discharge of used oil, fuel, grease, etc.
Into water body 0 1.2 groundwater
B leakage of oil, fuel, wells, etc. On land resulting in
contamination of ground water and wells Any other reason 0
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Is the impact significant enough to warrant mitigatory measures? 0
~ l:L_ If yes, provide necessary details:
Is the impact long term? 0 0 0 If yes, comment:
Can it be ratified by mitigatory measures? 0 0 0 If yes, what type
of mitigatory measures should be taken?
Did community bring the problem to the notice of authorities? 0 B 0
Has action been taken to counter the problem? Is it
effective?
/1/?J Additional comments:
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHECKLIST 6 AGRICULTURE
(N.B. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CARRY OUT HIS ACTIVITIES TO ENSURE
COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS STATED IN DRAFT LAW ON AGRICULTURE
MADE BY MAFF)
PROJECT SITE·PA.CI<fl.GE A
OBSERVER:
DATE: 27.01.2014 I TIME:2:00PM
WEATHER CONDITION:FINE
Checklist question
What is the impact of project activities on agriculture activities?
r-
road encroachment on paddy I agricultural land r-borrow pit located
on agricultural land spoil dump located on agricultural land ?-
Diversion of water channels and road construction resulting in
inundation of F- agricultural land := irrigation channels broken I
diverted due to project activities oil, grease and fuel road
run-off contaminating agricultural fields ~ Any other project
activities resulted in destruction of agricultural land Checklist
question Yes No Additional
data needs Is the impact significant enough to warrant
mitigatorymeasures? 0 s 0 If yes, provide necessary details:
Is the impact permanent? 0 521 0 If permanent, could it have been
avoided by taking appropriate
0 0 mitigatory measures?
If yes, how?
Is the impact temporary? 8 0 0 If yes, when and how could it be
corrected?
/f/lf?r in~ ;i){~~ qfrt I)~, ~~ ','~#() { d! 11 ,,? aJI! Checklist
questiorl I Yes No Additional
data needs Is the contractor using any insecticides on the site
which adversely
0 0 affect farmland?
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Is the community satisfied with the measures taken by the
contractor 0 to protect farmland?
If no, how and with what measures can it be improved?
Is the local administration satisfied with the measures taken by
the B 0 0 contractor to protect farmland?
If no, what is being suggested by the local administration?
Any additional comments:
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHECKLIST 7 LAND CONTAMINATION
PROJECT SITE:PACKAGE A
DATE: 27.01.2014 I TIME:2:45PM
WEATHER CONDIT!ON:FINE
Checklist question
What are the impacts of project activities on land?
road run-off of oil, grease and fuel contaminating land fuel oil/
used oil/ grease spill on land in equipment yards I camps sites
indiscriminate discharge of waste water on land Indiscriminate
disposal of solid waste
Any other project activities resulting in land contamination Ad
dB-Checklist question Yes No data needs
Is the impact significant enough to warrant mitigatory measures? 0
[) 0 If yes, provide necessary details:
Is the impact permanent? 0 s 0 If permanent, could it have been
avoided by taking appropriate 0 0 0 mediatory measures?
If yes, what type Pf mediatory measures should have been
taken?
Is the impact temporary? 0 0 0 If yes, when and how could it be
corrected?
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Is the community satisfied with the measures taken by the
contractor El 0 0 to protect agricultural activities?
Check list of EMP Implementation
If no, how and with what measures can it be improved?
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
-
Is the local administration satisfied with the measures taken by
the 0 contractor to protect agricultural activities?
-· If no, what is being suggested by the local
administration?
Did the community allow the use of their land for borrow pit or any
0 0 other purpose?
If yes, what was themotivation behind it?
r:,n~,;fJVt~"} '~~li>v·/%
If no, did the contractor take permission from the land owner and
local administration for the specific use?
Any additional comments:
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHECKLIST 8 CULTURAL HERITAGE
(N.B. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CARRY OUT HIS ACTIVITIES TO ENSURE
COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS STATED IN "LAW ON PROTECTION OF
CULTURAL AND NATIONAL HERITAGE", (1996)
PROJECT SITE:PACKAGE A
DATE: 27.01.2014 I TIME:3:00PM
WEATHER CONDITION:FINE
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Does the project area have any cultural heritage, archaeological, 0
0 0 historical or religious sites?
If yes, are they affected in any way by the project activities? 0 0
0 If yes, how?
Did the concerned authorities and the contractor take any 0 0 0
appropriate measures to protect the site?
If yes, what are the measures taken?
Are the communities satisfied with the measures taken? 0 0 0 Is the
community satisfied with the measures taken by the contractor 0 0 0
to protect land?
If no, how and with what measures can it be improved?
Is the local administration satisfied with the measures taken by
the 0 0 contractor to protect land? .
If no, what is being suggested by the local administration?
Any additional comments:
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHECKLIST 9 NOISE POLLUTION (N.B. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CARRY OUT HIS
ACTIVITIES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS STATED IN
DRAFT SUB DECREE ON AIR AND NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL)
PROJECT SITE:PACKAGE A
DATE: 27.01.2014
WEATHER CONDITION:FINE
Checklist question
vehicles on road generators, construction plant construction
vehicles Vibration from equipment vibration from road vehicles
Vibration from explosive blasting
Checklist question
I TIME:3:30PM
Yes No
If yes, did the contractor I consultant take appropriate measure to
mitigate the problem?
What is I are the measures taken? Vehicles regularly maintained and
silencers checked Speed limit enforced on project vehicles
Construction equipment maintained and silenced Compressors and
generators operated with silencing panels closed
Awareness raising of staff over causing nuisance to local
communities Blasting at fixed times and communities notified Avoid
undertaking construction activities and blasting close to
communities at night
Is noise pollution creating problems (health, aesthetic &
nuisance) for the surrounding communities?
If yes, what type of problems?
Check list of EMP Implementation
0
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
(N.B. THERE IS NO SPECIFIC REGULATION FOR THIS ACTIVITY)
PROJECT SITE:PACKAGE A
WEATHER CONDITION:FINE
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Is the flooding extensive or not? 0 0 0 If yes, give details:
Have contractors activities caused flooding or blocked drains? 0 0
0 If yes, give details:
Have cross drainage structures been built in correct location as 0
~ 0 shown in contract?
If no, give details:
Are cross drainage structures "as built" same as in "detailed 0 0
design"?
If no, give details:
ft,AJ., 1il<J !""/! n" "' ,.r Jn r:x~)!J 1JI:t~ Any other issues
1 I I 1
0 0 0
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHECKLIST 11 CONSTRUCTION CAMPS CLOSURE
(N.B. THERE IS NO SPECIFIC REGULATION FOR THIS ACTIVITY)
PROJECT SITE:
DATE: I TIME:
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Is the camp I yard located in a protected area, next to a community
0 0 0 water source or any other ecologically or otherwise sensitive
area? '
If yes, comment on the adverse impacts on the environment:
Has the camp I yard been properly cleared of all debris and 0 0 0
revegetated?
If no, list what was not done properly:
Was the wastewater disposed of properly? 0 0 0 If no, comment on
how it was being disposed and what were the impacts:
Were septic tanks installed? Have they been removed? 0 0 0 If no,
why not?
Was solid waste disposed of properly? 0 0 0 If no, comment on how
it was being disposed and the impacts of such disposal:
Was attention being paid to housekeeping? q 0 0 If no, comment on
what was not being done:
Check list of EMP Implementation
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Have all the contractor equipments being removed from the campsite
0 0 0 I yard? .
If yes, have all appropriate precautions been taken to avoid water
and land contamination?
Has the scrap metal from vehicle maintenance being disposed of 0 0
0 properly?
If no, comment on how it is to be disposed:
Has all fuel storage been removed from the site? 0 0 0 If no,
comment on how the surrounding area is being affected:
0 0 0 Have all general offices and staff dwellings been
removed?
If no, comment on if they are to be handed over to new owner or
other plans:
Does the community have any issues with the camp closure? 0 0 0 If
yes, what are the issues?
Any additional comments:
Check list of EMP Implementation
CHECK LIST OF EMP IMPLEMENTATION
Februa:ry 2014
Road 2620.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLISTS
ROAD 2620
CHECKLIST 1 CONSTRUCTION CAMPS
(N.B. THERE IS NO SPECIFIC REGULATION FOR THIS ACTIVITY. "GOOD
HOUSEKEEPING" MUST BE OBSERVED AND "GENERAL INDUSTRY PRACTICE"
FOLLOWED)
PROJECT SITE: PACKAGE A
OBSERVER:
FREQUENCY: CHECK WEEKLY DURING PREPARATION OF CAMP, AT OPENING OF
CAMP, THEN WEEKLY OR IN RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT.
DATE: 27.02.2014 I TIME: 10:00AM
LOCATION I ROAD DISTANCE: RN 2620 59.8KM WEATHER CONDITION:
FINE
CHECKLIST QUESTION YES NO ADDITIONAL DATA NEEDS
Is the camp I yard located in a protected area, next to a community
0 [j 0 water source or any other ecologically or otherwise
sensitive area?
If yes, comment on the adverse impacts on the environment:
Is the camp I yard being properly maintained? r:sr 0 0 If no, list
what is not being done properly:
Is the wastewater being disposed of properly? G:r 0 0 If no,
comment on how it is being disposed and what are the impacts:
If no, comment on. Have septic tanks been installed? Are they
working correctly, that is not overflowing, or emitting
smell?
Is the solid waste being disposed off properly? [3' 0 0 If no,
comment on how it is being disposed and the impacts of such
disposal:
Is attention being paid to "good housekeeping"? ~ 0 0 If no,
comment on what is not being done:
Check list of EMP Implementation
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Are the contractor's vehicles being maintained at the campsite
I
0 Ei 0 yard?
If yes, are appropriate precaution taken to avoid water and land
contamination?
Is the waste from vehicle maintenance being disposed off properly?
rnJ 0 I I If no, comment on how it is being disposed:
Is the fuel storage area properly surfaced and has a containment
kerb around it? lSi' 0 0 If no, comment on how the surrounding area
is being affected:
Are occupational health and hygiene precautions being taken? Gr 0 0
If no, comment on where they are being neglected:
Does the community have any issues with the camp? 0 M 0 If yes,
what are the issues?
Any additional comments:
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHECKLIST 2 BORROW PITS I QUARRIES
(N.B. THERE IS NO SPECIFIC REGULATION FOR THIS ACTIVITY)
---· PROJECT SITE: PACKAGE A
OBSERVER:
·-
WEATHER CONDITION: FINE
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Is the borrow pit I quarry located in a protected area, next to a
community water source or any other ecologically or otherwise 0 G;f
0 sensitive area?
If yes, comment on the adverse impacts on the environment:
Is the borrow pit I quarry being properly maintained? B 0 0 If no,
state what is not being done :
Is there adverse visual impact due to the borrow pit? 0 [1 0 If
yes, comment how:
-- Is borrow pits I quarries excavation I mining adequately
employing drainage and fill methodology to avoid any water pools
formation
Gl 0 0 during rains?
If no, comment:
Is the borrow pits I quarry properly rehabilitated at least
partially
~ 0 0 before the start of the rainy season?
If no, comment on what needs to be done:
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Check list of EMP Implementation
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Are there any signs of erosion and instability? 0 G:r 0 If yes,
what seems to be the reason?
Are the cut faces stabilized with appropriate materials and
methods? w 0 0 If no, what are the impacts?
Is the borrow pit I quarry to be closed and rehabilitated? 0 rs:r 0
If yes, is there a closure plan?
Are the borrow pit I quarry operations creating excessive dust
I
r:s:r noise? 0 0 If yes, are any measures being taken to minimize
dust and noise?
Do the communities have any concerns I issues with borrow pit
I
0 ~ 0 quarry during operation or after closure?
If yes, what are those concerns I issues?
Any additional comments:
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHECKLIST 3 EROSION OF SLOPES
(N.B. THERE IS NO SPECIFIC REGULATION FOR THIS ACTIVITY)
PROJECT SITE:PACKAGE A
DATE: 27.02.2014 I TIME:10:00AM
WEATHER CONDITION:FINE
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
What is I are the reason(s) for erosion /landslides I
instability?
Improper design I stripping of cut faces 0 ~ 0 Improper drainage 0
Clearing of vegetation /lack of gabions, geotextiles 0 [Sf 0
Improper leveling after earth removal
0 ur 0 Are the slopes properly stabilized before the start of the
rainy [SJ 0 0 season?
Inadequate water channel diversion, or 0 [SI 0 A combination of
some of the reasons above
0 ff D Is remedial action required?
D Gr D If yes, comment:
Did the erosion /landslide I instability cause any damage? 0 ~ 0 If
yes, what was the nature of the damage?
Did the contractor take appropriate mitigatory measures, pre and GY
0 0 post erosion I instability /landslides, to avoid I counter the
problem?
If no, why did the contractor not consider it necessary to take
appropriate mitigatory measures?
Was the erosion brought to the notice of appropriate authorities by
0 es::r 0 the communities?
If yes, was there any action taken?
If no, why was action not taken?
i1
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHECKLIST 4 AIR POLLUTION
(N.B. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CARRY OUT HIS ACTIVITIES TO ENSURE
COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS STATED IN DRAFT SUB DECREE ON AIR
AND NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL)
PROJECT SITE: PACKAGE A
DATE: 27.02.2014 I TIME: 11 :OOAM
LOCATION I ROAD DISTANCE: RN 2620 59.8KM
WEATHER CONDITION:FINE
Checklist question
What is the nature of air pollution?
dust from road G) dust from stock piled materials 0 generator,
batching plant emissions 0 Vehicular emissions 0 Checklist question
Yes No Additional
data needs Is the problem significant enough to warrant attention?
0 ~ 0 If yes, did the contractor take appropriate measure to
mitigate the problem?
what is I are the measures taken?
Periodic water sprays on road surface I borrow pits 8" Vehicle tire
washing facilities at borrow pits and other locations 0 Speed limit
enforced on project vehicles 0 Vehicles speeding checked by posting
signs on roads, and awareness raising of 0 staff and local
communities
Covering of stock piled materials
Vehicles regularly maintained 0 Equipment regularly maintained 0 Is
air pollution creating problems for the surrounding communities? 0
~ 0 If yes, what type of problems?
0
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHECKLIST 5 WATER POLLUTION
(N.B. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CARRY OUT HIS ACTIVITIES TO ENSURE
COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS STATED IN SUB DECREE ON WATER
POLLUTION CONTROL, NO. 27 ANRK.BK, APRIL 06, 1999)
PROJECT SITE:PACKAGE A
OBSERVER:
FREQUENCY: CHECK WEEKLY OR IN RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT. DATE:
27.02.2014 I TIME:1 :30PM
LOCATION I ROAD DISTANCE: RN 2620 59.8KM
WEATHER CONDITION:FINE
Checklist question
What is the nature of water contamination? 1.1 surface water
(stream, pond etc.)
disposal of cut spoil into water body or on slope leading to water
body B discharge of wastewater from camp into fresh water body road
run-off into water body Discharge of used oil, fuel, grease, etc.
Into water body 0 1.2 groundwater
B leakage of oil, fuel, wells, etc. On land resulting in
contamination of ground water and wells Any other reason 0
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Is the impact significant enough to warrant mitigatory measures? 0
52r 0 If yes, provide necessary details:
Is the impact long term? 0 Gr 0 If yes, comment:
Can it be ratified by mitigatory measures? g--- 0 0 If yes, what
type of mitigatory measures should be taken?
Did community bring the problem to the notice of authorities? 0 ~ 0
Has action been taken to counter the problem? Is it
effective?
Additional comments:
--
CHECKLIST 6 AGRICULTURE
---~----·----·
DATE: 27.02.2014 _I TIME:2:00PM
WEATHER CONDITION:FINE
Checklist question
What is the impact of project activities on agriculture
activities?
road encroachment on paddy I agricultural land ! borrow pit located
on agricultural land t spoil dump located on agricultural land
Diversion of water channels and road construction resulting in
inundation of agricultural land
1=--irrigation channels broken I diverted due to project activities
oil, grease and fuel road run-off contaminating agricultural fields
r-Any other project activities resulted in destruction of
agricultural land Checklist question Yes No Additional
data needs Is the impact significant enough to warrant
mitigatorymeasures? 0 G;r 0 If yes, provide necessary
details:
Is the impact permanent? 0 52r 0 If permanent, could it have been
avoided by taking appropriate 0 0 0 mitigatory measures?
If yes, how?
Is the impact temporary? Gr 0 0 If yes, when and how could it be
corrected?
? wdl cdf
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Is the contractor using any insecticides on the site which
adversely 0 ~ 0 affect farmland?
If yes, comment:
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Is the community satisfied with the measures taken by the
contractor Q" 0 to protect farmland?
If no, how and with what measures can it be improved?
Is the local administration satisfied with the measures taken by
the w 0 0 contractor to protect farmland?
If no, what is being suggested by the local administration?
Any additional comments:
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHECKLIST 7 LAND CONTAMINATION
PROJECT SITE:PACKAGE A
DATE: 27.02.2014 I TIME:2:45PM
WEATHER CONDITION:FINE
Checklist question
What are the impacts of project activities on land?
road run-off of oil, grease and fuel contaminating land fuel oil/
used oil/ grease spill on land in equipment yards I camps sites
indiscriminate discharge of waste water on land Indiscriminate
disposal of solid waste
Any other project activities resulting in land contamination 0
Checklist question Yes No Additional
data needs Is the impact significant enough to warrant mitigatory
measures? 0 Gr 0 If yes, provide necessary details:
Is the impact permanent? 0 [r 0 If permanent, could it have been
avoided by taking appropriate 0 Gr 0 mediatory measures?
If yes, what type Pf mediatory measures should have been
taken?
Is the impact temporary? 0 ~ 0 If yes, when and how could it be
corrected?
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
--
Check list of EMP Implementation
If no, how and with what measures can it be improved?
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Is the local administration satisfied with the measures taken by
the Er 0 0 contractor to protect agricultural activities?
If no, what is being suggested by the local administration?
Did the community allow the use of their land for borrow pit or any
s 0 0 other purpose?
If yes, what was themotivation behind it?
~ cs mor;EJ to them
If no, did the contractor take permission from the land owner and
local administration for the specific use?
Any additional comments:
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHECKLIST 8 CULTURAL HERITAGE
(N.B. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CARRY OUT HIS ACTIVITIES TO ENSURE
COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS STATED IN "LAW ON PROTECTION OF
CULTURAL AND NATIONAL HERITAGE", (1996)
-- PROJECT SITE:PACKAGE A
DATE: 27.02.2014 I TIME:3:00PM
WEATHER CONDITION:FINE
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Does the project area have any cultural heritage, archaeological, 0
rlr 0 historical or religious sites?
If yes, are they affected in any way by the project activities? 0 0
0_ If yes, how?
Did the concerned authorities and the contractor take any 0 g 0
appropriate measures to protect the site?
If yes, what are the measures taken?
Are the communities satisfied with the measures taken? B 0 0 Is the
community satisfied with the measures taken by the contractor [if 0
0 to protect land?
If no, how and with what measures can it be improved?
Is the local administration satisfied with the measures taken by
the g 0 0 contractor to protect land?
If no, what is being suggested by the local administration?
Any additional comments:
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHECKLIST 9 NOISE POLLUTION (N.B. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CARRY OUT HIS
ACTIVITIES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS STATED IN
DRAFT SUB DECREE ON AIR AND NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL)
PROJECT SITE:PACKAGE A
DATE: 27.02.2014
WEATHER CONDITION:FINE
Checklist question
vehicles on road generators, construction plant construction
vehicles · Vibration from equipment vibration from road vehicles
Vibration from explosive blasting
I TIME:3:30PM
Checklist question Yes No Additional
Is the problem significant enough to warrant attention? 0 If yes,
did the contractor I consultant take appropriate measure to
mitigate the problem?
What is I are the measures taken? Vehicles regularly maintained and
silencers checked Speed limit enforced on project vehicles
Construction equipment maintained and silenced Compressors and
generators operated with silencing panels closed
Awareness raising of staff over causing nuisance to local
communities Blasting at fixed times and communities notified Avoid
undertaking construction activities and blasting close to
communities at night
Is noise pollution creating problems (health, aesthetic &
nuisance) for the surrounding communities?
If yes, what type of problems?
Check list of EMP Implementation
0
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
(N.B. THERE IS NO SPECIFIC REGULATION FOR THIS ACTIVITY)
PROJECT SITE:PACKAGE A
WEATHER CONDITION:FINE
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Is the flooding extensive or not? 0 [3" 0 If yes, give
details:
Have contractors activities caused flooding or blocked drains? 0
[1;t 0 If yes, give details:
Have cross drainage structures been built in correct location as 0
Gr 0 shown in contract?
If no, give details:
Are cross drainage structures "as built" same as in "detailed 0 fiY
0 design"?
If no, give details:
Aequ b)j f1 People-. Any other issues 0 0 0
CHECKLIST 11 CONSTRUCTION CAMPS CLOSURE
Check list of EMP Implementation
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
(N.B. THERE IS NO SPECIFIC REGULATION FOR THIS ACTIVITY)
PROJECT SITE:
DATE: I TIME:
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Is the camp I yard located in a protected area, next to a community
0 0 0 water source or any other ecologically or otherwise sensitive
area?
If yes, comment on the adverse impacts on the environment:
Has the camp I yard been properly cleared of all debris and 0 0 0
revegetated?
If no, list what was not done properly:
Was the wastewater disposed of properly? 0 0 0 If no, comment on
how it was being disposed and what were the impacts:
Were septic tanks installed? Have they been removed? 0 0 0 If no,
why not?
Was solid waste disposed of properly? 0 0 0 If no, comment on how
it was being disposed and the impacts of such disposal:
Was attention being paid to housekeeping? 0 0 0 If no, comment on
what was not being done:
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Have all the contractor equipments being removed from the campsite
0 0 0 I yard?
Check list of EMP Implementation
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
If yes, have all appropriate precautions been taken to avoid water
and land contamination?
Has the scrap metal from vehicle maintenance being disposed of 0 0
0 properly? "
If no, comment on how it is to be disposed:
Has all fuel storage been removed from the site? 0 0 0 If no,
comment on how the surrounding area is being affected:
0 0 0 Have all general offices and staff dwellings been
removed?
If no, comment on if they are to be handed over to new owner or
other plans:
Does the community have any issues with the camp closure? 0 0 0 If
yes, what are the issues?
Any additional comments:
Check list of EMP Implementation
CHECK LIST OF EMP IMPLEMENTATION
March 2014
Road 2620
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLISTS
ROAD 2620
CHECKLIST 1 CONSTRUCTION CAMPS
(N.B. THERE IS NO SPECIFIC REGULATION FOR THIS ACTIVITY. "GOOD
HOUSEKEEPING" MUST BE OBSERVED AND "GENERAL INDUSTRY PRACTICE"
FOLLOWED)
PROJECT SITE: PACKAGE A
OBSERVER:
FREQUENCY: CHECK WEEKLY DURING PREPARATION OF CAMP, AT OPENING OF
CAMP, THEN WEEKLY OR IN RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT.
DATE: 27.03.2014 I TIME: 10:00AM
LOCATION I ROAD DISTANCE: RN 2620 59.8KM WEATHER CONDITION:
FINE
CHECKLIST QUESTION YES NO ADDITIONAL DATA NEEDS
Is the camp I yard located in a protected area, next to a community
0 Gj' 0 water source or any other ecologically or otherwise
sensitive area?
If yes, comment on the adverse impacts on the environment:
Is the camp I yard being properly maintained? csr 0 0 If no, list
what is not being done properly:
Is the wastewater being disposed of properly? 52r 0 0 If no,
comment on how it is being disposed and what are the impacts:
If no, comment on. Have septic tanks been installed? Are they
working correctly, that is not overflowing, or emitting
smell?
Is the solid waste being disposed off properly? [Y 0 0 If no,
comment on how it is being disposed and the impacts of such
disposal:
Is attention being paid to "good housekeeping"? G:r 0 0 If no,
comment on what is not being done:
Check list of EMP Implementation
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Checklist question Yes No Additional data needs
Are the contractor's vehicles being maintained at the campsite
I
0 0 0 yard? . 0
··-··--
If yes, are appropriate precaution taken to avoid water and land
contamination?
Is the waste from vehicle maintenance being disposed off properly?
~ 0 0 If no, comment on how it is being disposed:
Is the fuel storage area properly surfaced and has a containment
kerb around it? ~ 0 0 If no, comment on how the surrounding area is
being affected:
Are occupational health and hygiene precautions being taken? rsr 0
0 If no, comment on where they are being neglected:
Does the community have any issues with the camp? 0 [Sj 0 If yes,
what are the issues?
Any additional comments:
EDCF LOAD NO.KHM-11 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CHE