Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
1
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA FEDERAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT (FPMU)
RURAL ACCESS AND MOBILITY PROJECT (RAMP)
Consulting Services for Detailed Engineering, Safeguard Studies & Preparation of Bidding Documents for Prioritised Roads in ENUGU STATE under RAMP 2
Environmental & Social Impact Assessment Report (ESIA)-Revised
June, 2012
E1965 v9
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
2
CONTACT INFORMATION
Firm: PHEMAN PENIEL CONSULTANTS Ltd
Address: 76B, Adeniyi Jones Avenue (2nd Floor),
PO Box 14006, Ikeja,
Lagos, Nigeria
Tel:. 0803 403 1493
0805 507 3665
0807 884 5071
Text: 0807 884 5071
Email: [email protected],
Website: www.phemanpeniel.com
Contact
Person: Engr. Dr. Emmanuel A. ADEYEMO, Ph.D., C.Eng., FASCE, FNSE,FNICE
CEO/Managing Principal
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
Title Page 1
Contact Information 2
Table of Contents 3
Submission Letter 5
Abbreviations and Acronyms 7
List of Tables 7
List of Figures 7
List of Pictures 7
Executive Summary 8
1.0 Introduction and General Description of Project 10
1.1 Background on the Project 10
1.2 Objective of RAMP2 10
1.3 Objectives of ESIA Study 10
1.4 Description of the Road Projects 11
1.5 Approach and Methodology 12
1.6 Report Structure 13
2.0 Policy, Legislative, Regulatory, and Administrative Considerations 15
2.1 Introduction 15
2.2 Policy and Regulatory Framework 15
2.3 Nigerian Regulatory Framework 16
2.4 Summary of World Bank Environment and Social Safeguard Policies 20
2.5 Conclusion 20
3.0 Description Of The Proposed Road Projects 21
3.1 Ownership Status, Pavement Conditions And
Intervention Type of Project Roads 21
3.2 General Description of Project Roads 21
3.3 Project Justification 23
4.0 Description Of Project Environment And Social Context 27
4.1 Physical Setting 27
4.2 Socio-Cultural Environment 29
4.3 Natural Resources 32
4.4 Summary of socio-economic Data 32
5.0 Public Participation And Consultations 33
5.1 Public Consultations 33
5.2 Inventory of Potential Losses 33
5.3 Community Concerns 34
6.0 Environment Impacts And Mitigation Measures 35
6.1 Vegetation and Wildlife 35
6.2 Physical Impacts 35
6.3 Hazardous Materials and Solid Waste Management 35
6.4 Impact on Freshwater Resources 35
6.5 Impact on Water Supply 36
6.6 Construction Camps 36
6.7 Quarries/Borrow Pits 37
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
4
6.8 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts 37
6.9 Air Quality and Noise Levels 37
7.0 Social Impacts And Mitigation Measures 39
7.1 Contribution to Poverty Reduction 39
7.2 Improved Access to Services and Facilities 40
7.3 Impact on Cultural Environment 40
7.4 Health and Safety 40
7.5 Traffic and Access Issues 41
7.6 Risk of Spread of Communicable Diseases and Trafficking 42
7.7 Other Social Impacts-Stress on Resources and Infrastructure 43
7.8 Gender Issues 44
8.0 Environmental And Social Management Plan 46
8.1 Institutional Responsibilities 46
8.2 Responsibilities of the Contractor 47
9.0 Environmental Monitoring Plan 48
9.1 Introduction 48
9.2 Contingencies, Complaints and Incidents 48
9.3 Reporting and Review 49
APPENDICES: 49
Appendix A: Environmental and Social Screening Reports (Tables Ap1.1-Ap1.4) 50
Appendix B: Environmental and Social Management Plans (Tables Ap2.1-Ap2.4) 58
Appendix C: Environmental Monitoring Plans (Tables Ap3.1-Ap3.4) 88
Appendix D-2: Minutes of Consultation and Notification Meeting (Umuaniagu) 98
Appendix D-3: Minutes of Consultation and Notification Meeting (Ojor) 101
Appendix E: Summary of World Bank Environment and Social Safeguard Policies 104
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
5
June 18, 2012
The National Coordinator, (Federal Project Management Unit),
RURAL ACCESS and MOBILITY PROJECT (RAMP),
NAIC House,
Plot 590, Zone AO,
Along Airport Road, Central Area, Abuja, Nigeria
Dear Sir,
Re: Consulting Services for Detailed Engineering, Safeguard Studies & Preparation of Bidding
Documents for Prioritised Roads in ENUGU STATE under RAMP 2
ESIA Report (Revised)
We hereby submit the revised ESIA Reports on the above project.
In accordance with the Terms of Reference (TOR) and the signed Contract Agreement.
Thank you very much.
Yours sincerely,
Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd.
Engr. Dr. Emmanuel A. ADEYEMO
CEO/Managing Principal
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
6
ABBREVIATIONS and ACRONYMS
AADT Average Annual Daily Traffic
ADT Average Daily Traffic
ARAP Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan
AFD Agence Francaise de Developpment
BEME Bill of Engineering Measurements and Evaluation
CBN Central Bank of Nigeria
DFID Department for International Development, UK
DP Displaced Persons
EMP Environmental Management Plan
ESG Enugu State Government
ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework
ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan
FGD Focus Group Discussion
FGN Federal Government of Nigeria
FMoH Federal Ministry of Health
FMW Federal Ministry of Works
FPMU Federal Project Management Unit
GDP Gross Domestic Product
HIV/AIDS Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
IDA International Development Association
LEEDS Local Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy
LGA Local Government Authority
NBS National Bureau of Statistics
NEEDS National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy
PAD Project Appraisal Document
PAP Project Affected Person
PIM Project Implementation Manual
PRA Participatory Rural Appraisal
PRS Poverty Reduction Strategy
RAMP Rural Access and Mobility Project
RAP Resettlement Action Plan
RoW Right of Way
RPF Resettlement Policy Framework
SEEDS State Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy
SPIU State Project Implementation Unit
SSI Semi Structured Interview
WHO World Health Organisation
WB World Bank
UN United Nations
UNICEF United Nations International Children Education Fund
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
7
LIST OF TABLES Page
Table 1.1: Prioritised Clusters of Roads in Enugu State 10
Table2.1: Summary of Requirements of Bank Safeguards policies
Triggered by the Activities of Ramp 11 16
Table 2.2: Comparison of Nigerian Land-use (1978) and World Bank’s
OP 4.12 19
Table 3.1: Ownership Status, Pavement Condition and proposed
Intervention Type 21
Table 4.1: Population Characteristics of Affected Communities 28
Table 4.2: Projected Population Distribution for the LGAs with RAMP
Intervention Areas 29
Table AP 1.1: Environment and Social Screening for Cluster ₦1 Roads 51
Table AP 1.2: Environment and Social Screening for Cluster ₦2 Roads 53
Table AP 1.3: Environment and Social Screening for Cluster ₦3 Roads 54
Table AP 1.4: Environment and Social Screening for Cluster ₦4 Roads 55
Table AP 2.1: Environment and Social Management Plan for Cluster ₦1 Roads 60
Table AP 2.2: Environment and Social Management Plan for Cluster ₦2 Roads 67
Table AP 2.3: Environment and Social Management Plan for Cluster ₦3 Roads 74
Table AP 2.4: Environment and Social Management Plan for Cluster ₦4 Roads 81
Table AP 3.1: Environment Monitoring Plan for Cluster ₦1 Roads 88
Table AP 3.2: Environment Monitoring Plan for Cluster ₦2 Roads 90
Table AP 3.3: Environment Monitoring Plan for Cluster ₦3 Roads 92
Table AP 3.4: Environment Monitoring Plan for Cluster ₦4 Roads 94
Table AP 4.1: Matrix of Accessibility and Mobility Data 95
Table AP4.2: Matrix of Economic Efficiency Data 96
Table AP4.3: Matrix of Social Impact Data 97
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1: Road Map of Enugu State 13
LIST OF PICTURES
Pix D-1: Stakeholders@ Umuaniagu 95
Pix D-2: Women Group @ Umuaniagu 95
Pix D-3: Stakeholders @ Ojor 96
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES.1: Introduction
The objective of RAMP 2 is to provide rural communities with improved access to social services and economic
opportunities, and to enhance the capacity of relevant government institutions to better manage rural
transport infrastructure. The indicative objective is to rehabilitate/upgrade 203.45km of rural roads divided into
four clusters (59.26km, 57.16km, 42.22km and 44.81km)of roads in Enugu State.
ES.2 Objectives of ESIA Study
The overarching objective of the study was;
a. To identify and evaluate the environmental effects, which will be caused by the proposed project,
including any potential indirect and cumulative effects taking into account other initiatives planned in
the study area.
b. To identify and evaluate environmental and social-economic effects which will be caused by the
proposed construction and operation of the road.
c. To identify and describe procedures and measures that will mitigate the predicted adverse impacts of
the project and measures that will enhance its beneficial effects.
d. To ensure that proposed mitigation measures during construction stages are implemented.
e. To undertake a cultural impact assessment and,
f. Develop an environmental and social management monitoring plan.
ES.3 Potential Environmental and Social Impacts: Potential environmental and social impacts were identified on
two (2) roads and in two communities listed below.
Road #13: UNTH-Enuguagu Ndiagu-Umuaniagu-Obe Amuri Road (11.88kM) at Umuaniagu Village.
Three (3) major traditional religion shrines located within the RoW at Chainage 2+050 of the proposed
road and belong to the community. They are a communal cultural heritage site . The shrines will be
relocated to locations religiously acceptable to the community but will be outside the RoW of the
proposed road. The community through the custodians of the shrines will be compensated for the cost of
relocation.
Between 2+050 and 2+550, there are 63 oil palm trees and 54 fruit trees on cassava farmland on the
RoW of the proposed road. This is a case of land acquisition for the road project.. The owners will be
compensated for both economic loss and land.
4,500 square metres of cassava and farmland on the RoW of the proposed road. This is a case of land
acquisition for the road project.. The owners will be compensated for both economic loss and land.
Road #12: Adani-Asaba-Igga-Ojor Road (9.94kM) @ Ojor Village.
At Chainage 8+825, three major shrines (3m x 3m) and forty(40) minor shrines (worship spots under trees),
all traditional religion shrines of the community are located within the RoW of the proposed road. They
are a communal cultural heritage site . The shrines will be relocated to locations religiously acceptable to
the community but will be outside the RoW of the proposed road. The community through the
custodians of the shrines will be compensated for the cost of relocation.
At 8+825 – 9+075, there is a 1,200 square metres of cassava and farmland on the RoW of the proposed
road. This is a case of land acquisition for the road project. The owners will be compensated for both
economic loss and land.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
9
At 8+890, there is a community transformer with protective blockwall (5m x 5m) on the RoW of the
proposed road. The transformer will be relocated about 10metres away from its current location. The cost
of relocation will be paid to the community.
At 9+200 - 9+800, there exists a land area (600m x 6m) i.e. 3m on either sides beyond the cassava farm to
be acquired for the road. This is a case of land acquisition for the road project and compensation will be
paid to the owner.
General Environmental Impact: For all settlements and villages on all the 15 Roads: Noise and Dust from
construction activities.
ES.4 Project Environmental and Social Screening Categorization
Each of the 15 potential project roads has been categorized, based on the visual survey and initial
consultations into Category B. Based on the outcomes of the screening exercise which have been tabulated in
Tables AP1.1, AP1.2, AP1.3 and AP1.4 in Appendix A, all the road projects in the four (4) clusters fall under
Category B and are qualified to be financed under RAMP II because their environmental impacts are less
adverse. The projects qualify for Category B because more than 50% of the screening outcomes are “Nos”
according to Tables AP1.1, AP1.2, AP1.3 and AP1.4.
ES.5 Environment Impacts and Mitigation Measures
In addition to the compensatory measures recommended for the affected people, necessary mitigation
measures have been recommended as they relate to ecology, physical environment, use of hazardous
materials, generation of solid waste, effects on water supply and water resources, operation of construction
camps and management of borrow pits during construction. The environmental impacts of the roads are less
adverse. See Chapter 6.
ES.6 Social Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Social impacts have been identified and necessary positive impacts and mitigation recommendations as they
relate to poverty reduction, improved access to services and facilities, cultural environments, health and safety,
traffic and access, risk and spread of communicable diseases and trafficking, stress on resources and
infrastructure and gender mainstreaming have been highlighted in the main report. The social impacts of the
roads are positive. See Chapter 7.
ES.7: Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs)
The ESMPs for the four clusters of road are cost effective and are achievable. See Appendix B. There is no
marginal cost implication except for the cost of ARAP which have been included in the Bills of Engineering
Measurements and Evaluation for the two (2) affected roads. The cost estimates for institutional responsibilities
and training needs have already been taken care of under Component #3 of RAMP2: Capacity Building and
Project Administration and do not need to be duplicated in this report.
ES.8: Environmental Monitoring Plans (EMPs)
The EMPs for the four clusters of road are cost effective and are achievable. See Appendix C. There is no
marginal cost implication except for the cost of ARAP which have been included in the Bills of Engineering
Measurements and Evaluation for the two (2) affected roads. The cost estimates for institutional responsibilities
and training needs have already been taken care of under Component #3 of RAMP2: Capacity Building and
Project Administration and do not need to be duplicated in this report.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
10
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
1.1 BACKGROUND ON THE PROJECT
The Federal Government of Nigeria has commenced with the implementation of the Rural Access and Mobility
Project (RAMP) in Enugu State with support financing from the World Bank and the Agence Francaise De
Developpment (AFD) and guided by the Government’s Rural Travel and Transport Policy (RTTP). The lead
agency for the Federal Government is the Federal Department of Agriculture (FDA) of the Federal Ministry of
Agriculture and Rural Development (FMARD). The Federal Project Management Unit (FPMU) is overseeing the
project on behalf of FDA, while the Enugu State Government is expected to implement it.
The overall objectives of RAMP is to support participating state and local governments in providing improved
all-weather access roads in selected and prioritized rural intervention areas, rehabilitate prioritized river
crossings and support the institutional reforms in the transport sector leading to optimization and improvement
of the sector management in Enugu State.
This component of RAMP2 involves the rehabilitation works for an indicative 203.45kM of rural and state roads in
Enugu State as well as the related design studies and external supervision activities.
1.2 Objective of RAMP 2
The objective of RAMP 2 is to provide rural communities with improved access to social services and economic
opportunities, and to enhance the capacity of relevant government institutions to better manage rural
transport infrastructure. The indicative objective is to rehabilitate 203.45km of rural roads in Enugu State. Road
standards will be determined as part of the road design studies, with proper economic justification. Considering
traffic levels observed on rural roads in Enugu state (current average daily vehicle traffic (AADT) of less than 50
vehicles per day (vpd) and typical current motorcycle traffic of 50 to 100 cycles per day), it is expected that
the RAMP-2 project will rehabilitate existing roads, without any paving/asphalt treatment involved. The list of the
high priority roads in six (6) intervention areas in Enugu State is detailed in Table 1.1, the sub-division of the state
into intervention areas is shown in Figure 1.2.
1.3 Objectives of ESIA Study
The overarching objective of the study was to examine the environmental effects of the proposed rural roads
alignments and to advise the choice of the final alignment taking all environmental concerns into
consideration. The specific objectives of the study were:
a. To identify and evaluate the environmental effects, which will be caused by the proposed project,
including any potential indirect and cumulative effects taking into account other initiatives
planned in the study area.
b. To identify and evaluate environmental and social-economic effects which will be caused by the
proposed construction and operation of the road.
c. To identify and describe procedures and measures that will mitigate the predicted adverse
impacts of the project and measures that will enhance its beneficial effects.
d. To ensure that proposed mitigation measures during construction stages are implemented.
e. To ensure that the ESIA study conforms with RAMP Environmental and Social Management
Framework (ESMF), Resettlement Plan framework (RPF) and the project’s Abbreviated Resettlement
Action Plan (ARAP).
f. To undertake a cultural impact assessment and,
g. Develop environmental and social management and monitoring plans.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
11
1.4 Description of the Road Projects
Table 1.1 provides the names, lengths, locations and intervention areas of the high priority roads under the
second stage of the Rural Access and Mobility Project (RAMP2) in Enugu State. The administrative map of
Enugu State is shown in Figure 1.1.
Table 1.1: Prioritised Clusters of Roads in Enugu State
Cluster
Description: Intervention Areas and Road Links
Length
(KM)
1.
UDI Intervention Area
Rd 32 Umuabi-Ehuhe Achi Road 9.48km
Rd 36 Abor Road 4.46km
Rd 37 Egede – Awhum Road 6.50km
Rd 39 St. Mary Ngwo – Nsude Road: 6.25km
EZEAGU/OJI RIVER Intervention Area
Rd 41 Ugwuoba – Nkwere Inyi- Inyi Road 19.88km
Rd 42Isu Abaraji – Akpugo Eze – Inyi Market Road 12.69km
Total for Cluster #1 59.26kM
2.
NKANU EAST/NKANU WEST/ENUGU SOUTH Intervention Area
Rd 13 UNTH – Enuguagu Ndiagu-Umuaniagu–Obe – Amuri Road 11.88km
Rd 18 Mbogodo – Obinagu Uwani Akpugo – Ihuokpara Road 15.0km
ANINRI/AWGU Intervention Area
Rd 23 Mamaku-Awangbidi-Nkwe-Ezere-Isochi Road 9.28km
Rd 24 Uhueze Nenwe – Nomeh – Mburubu – Nara Road 21.00km
Total for Cluster #2 57.16kM
3.
IZI UZO Intervention Area
Rd 3 Neke – Umualor Road 16.84km
Rd 5 Neke – Mbu – Ogbodo Aba – Obollo Etiti Road 25.38km
Total for Cluster #3 42.22kM
4.
UZO UWANI Intervention Area
Rd 9a Ukpabi – Nimbo – Ugbene Ajima – Eziani Road 28.62km
Rd 9b Ikwoka –Amagu – Ajuona – Akabusiyi – Obimo Road 6.25km
Rd 12 Adani – Asaba – Igga - Ojor 9.94km
Total for Cluster #4 44.81kM
Grand Total
203.45kM
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
12
1.5 Approach and Methodology
1.5.1 Research Reports and Surveys
This report is built upon the following works;
i. A preliminary Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) including Environmental and
Social Management and Monitoring Plans of May 2008 produced by the Federal Project Management
Unit of RAMP for Enugu and Osun States.
ii. A preliminary Resettlement Policy Framework produced by the Federal Project Management Unit of
RAMP.
iii. Prioritisation Study Report for Enugu State prepared by Pheman Peniel Consultants for FPMU in 2010.
iv. RAMP2 project appraisal document of 2011.
v. Terms of Reference for the preparation of ESIA report by FPMU.
vi. Reporting format prepared and made available by FPMU’s ESIA Consultant
These reports form an important backdrop to this report. They are available from the FPMU Office.
1.5.2 Compliance with the National, State and International Environmental Standards
The approach taken throughout this report is consistent with the environmental guidelines of the following
bodies.
i. Federal Ministry of the Environment of Nigeria’s Environmental Guidelines(1999 Presidential
Directives)
ii. Enugu State’s Ministry of the Environmental Guidelines;
iii. Environmental Impact Assessment Act Cap 139 LFN, 1992
iv. Land-use Act Cap 202 LFN 1990
v. Nigerian Urban and Regional Planning Law No. 88, 1992
vi. Other Government laws and regulations regarding environment and social issues;
vii. World Bank Environmental and Social Safeguard Policies (OP4.01, BP4.01 and GP4.01)
viii. World Bank Operational Policy (OP 4.12) on Involuntary Resettlement;
ix. World Bank Rural Roads Checklist;
.
1.5.2 Public Consultations
To understand the biophysical nature of the roads alignment area the field team visited the site. A survey along
the roads alignment was done and observations made of human habitat, vegetation and existing ecosystems
and places of cultural significance among others. Thus, it was important to visit the site between 19th and 23rd
March, 2012 for route alignment identification, confirmation and conduct baseline studies. This was followed by
detailed site investigation for social and environmental studies carried out from 16th to 20th April, 2012 and a
confirmatory census of PAPs from 28th to 30th May, 2012. During the site visits, the team was also able to meet
the relevant stakeholders.
1.5.3 Inventory of Potential Losses
The combined team of the Consultant and SPIU have visited each section of the roads to identify any assets
and people who may be negatively affected by the proposed road-works. An inventory of potential losses has
been developed for each section and had formed the basis of the ARAPs. Discussions with affected persons
and communities regarding compensation options and grievance redress procedures have been completed
for the affected roads.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
13
1.5.4 Environment and Social Management Planning, Review and Clearing Process
In this context, the social and Environment management process has involved the following steps and
procedures:
i. Scoping and Screening
ii. Project Categorization and Justification for ESIA
1.5.5 Environment Impacts and Mitigation Measures
In addition to the compensatory measures recommended for the affected people, necessary mitigation
measures have been recommended as they relate to ecology, physical environment, use of hazardous
materials, generation of solid waste, effects on water supply and water resources, operation of construction
camps and management of borrow pits during construction.
1.5.6 Social Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Social impacts have been identified and necessary positive impacts and mitigation recommendations as they
relate to poverty reduction, improved access to services and facilities, cultural environments, health and safety,
traffic and access, risk and spread of communicable diseases and trafficking, stress on resources and
infrastructure and gender mainstreaming have been highlighted in the main report.
1.5.7 Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs)
The ESMPs for the four clusters of road which are cost effective and are achievable have been prepared.
1.5.8 Environmental Monitoring Plans (EMPs)
The EMPs for the four clusters of road which are cost effective and are achievable have been prepared.
1.5.9 Data Analysis and Presentation
Information/data obtained from the field was both qualitative and quantitative although the latter formed the
bulk of it. In this case therefore the information was synthesised into a report on project impacts, proposed
measures for mitigating the impacts including the opinions and concerns of the affected communities.
1.6 Report Structure
This report contains details of the Environmental Impact Assessment of the planned rural road upgrading
projects in Enugu State under the Rural Access and Mobility Project (RAMP2). The report is arranged as follows:
Executive Summary
Chapter One Introduction and General Description of Project
Chapter Two Policy, Legislative, Regulatory and Administrative Considerations
Chapter Three Description of the Proposed Project
Chapter Four Description of the Project Environment and Social Context
Chapter Five Public Participation and Consultation
Chapter Six Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Chapter Seven Social Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Chapter Eight Environmental and Social Management Plans
Chapter Nine Environmental and Social Monitoring Plans
Appendices
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
14
Figure 1.1: Road Map of Enugu State
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
15
2.0 POLICY, LEGISLATIVE, REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS
2.1 Introduction
The Nigerian government is committed to ensuring that the environment and the economic activities of people
are not negatively impacted in any way in the project areas. Nigeria recognizes that improving safety in the
road corridor by modifying existing land use within the safety corridor in the road reservation (i.e. partial or
complete demolition of sheds, building and farmlands) requires the application of both national policies and
laws and the relevant policies of the World Bank – the financing institution of the RAMP project. The Bank
requires that environmental and social impacts of the project it supports be mitigated according to operational
policies that spell out the principles and planning methods for mitigation work
An ESIA will be carried out in accordance with the laws of Nigeria and that of the World Bank Environmental
and Social safeguards, which has resulted in the preparation of this ESIA. Though the World Bank recognizes
improving road conditions as very important, the Banks applies ESIA whenever property must be acquired, or its
use modified, for a project, when acquisition or modification results in the loss of income, residence or access to
resources, either permanent or temporary.
2.2 Policy and Regulatory Framework
The following policy and regulatory frameworks guided the preparation of this ESIA:
2.2.1 World Bank Safeguard Policies
The World Bank Group is made up of two unique development institutions owned by 187 member countries: the
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Development Association
(IDA).Each institution plays a different but collaborative role in advancing the vision of inclusive and sustainable
globalization. The IBRD aims to reduce poverty in middle-income and creditworthy poorer countries, while IDA
focuses on the world's poorest countries. Their work is complemented by that of the International Finance
Corporation (IFC), Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) and the International Centre for the
Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).
Whereas:
The World Bank uses Safeguard Policies which apply to projects owned by States and the Public
sector;
The IFC uses performance standards, and are used for projects owned or sponsored by the
private sector;
The MIGA provides political risks guarantees that may accompany an investment in an untested
environment.
This project is a public good under the ownership of the Federal and State Ministry of Works therefore; the World
Bank Safeguard Policies are used. The World Bank has 10+2 Safeguard Policies to reduce or eliminate the
adverse negative effects of development projects, and improve decision making.
With respect to this report (ESIA), the Environment Assessment (OP4.01, BP 4.01, GP 4.01) is applied. This
policy screen early for potential impacts and select appropriate instrument to assess, minimize, and mitigate
potentially adverse impacts. This policy promote public consultation of the affected groups and NGOs as early
as possible for category A and B projects.
This policy requires Environment assessment (EA) of projects/investments proposed for Bank financing to help
ensure that they are environmentally sound and sustainable, and thus improve decision making. The EA is a
process whose depth and type of analysis depend on the nature, scale, and potential Environment impact of
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
16
the activities proposed for funding under the RAMP II. The EA process takes into account the natural
environment (air, water, and land): human health and safety; social aspects (involuntary resettlement,
indigenous peoples, and cultural property) and transboundary and global Environment aspects. The
Environment and social impacts of the project will come from the activities and investments to be made under
Component 2 of the project that is upgrading, rehabilitation and maintenance of transport infrastructure.
However, since the exact technical details and location of the investments will not be identified prior to the
appraisal of this project, the EA process calls for the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN), represented by the
Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources (FMAWR) to prepare an Environment and Social
Management Framework (ESMF) report which will establish a mechanism to determine and assess future
potential Environment and social impacts of the State’s Project Implementation Unit (SPIU) project investments
under the proposed RAMP II, and then to set out mitigation, monitoring and institutional measures to be taken
during implementation and operation of the project investments to eliminate adverse Environment and social
impacts, offset them, or reduce them to acceptable levels.
2.2.2 Involuntary Resettlement OP/BP 4.12
Significant efforts are to be made in the design and screening stages of proposed SPIU’s project investments, to
avoid impacts on people, land, property, including person’s access to natural and other economic resources,
as far as possible. Notwithstanding, land acquisition, compensation and resettlement of people seem inevitable
for certain types of investments on certain occasions. These social issues are of crucial concern to the FGN and
the Bank as its impact on poverty, if left unmitigated, is negative, immediate and widespread. Thus, OP 4.12 will
be triggered in those cases. Therefore, a Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) has been prepared by the
government and approved by the Bank in compliance with OP 4.12. The RPF sets the guidelines for the
Resettlement and Compensation Plans (RAPs) that would have to be prepared when any project investment
triggers this policy. The RAPs would have to be submitted to Enugu State Ministry of Environment (EnMOE) and
to the Federal Ministry of the Environment for approval; and would also have to be approved by the World
Bank as a condition for the commencement of civil works.
This policy would be triggered when the planned activities of the SPIU cause involuntary taking of land and
other assets resulting in: (a) relocation or loss of shelter, (b) loss of assets or access to assets (c) loss of income
sources or means of livelihood, whether or not the affected persons must physically move to another location.
The World Bank Safeguard policy OP/BP 4.12, in most cases, is not triggered because people are being
affected by physical displacement. It is triggered because the project activity causes land acquisition,
whereby a physical piece of land is needed and people may be affected because they are cultivating on
that land, they may have buildings on the land, they may be using the land for water and grazing of animals or
they may otherwise access the land economically, spiritually or any other way which may not be possible
during and after the project is implemented. Therefore, people are in most cases compensated for their loss (of
land, property or access) either in kind or in cash of which the former is preferred.
The resettlement policy applies to all affected and displaced persons regardless of the total number affected,
severity of impact and whether or not they have legal title to land. OP/BP 4.12 requires the RPF to be disclosed
both in Nigeria and at the Bank Info shop before project appraisal. A summary of the requirements of the Bank
Safeguards Policies triggered by the activities in RAMP II is presented below.
2.3 Nigeria Regulatory Framework
With regards to management of the bio-physical environment throughout Nigeria, the overall responsibility was
held by the now defunct Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA), which was absorbed into the
Federal Ministry of Environment in 1999.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
17
Table 2.1: Summary of Requirements of Bank Safeguards Policies Triggered by the activities in RAMP II
Bank Safeguards
Policy Triggered.
Action Required by
Triggered Policy By Whom Date action required by.
OP/BP 4.01
Environment
Assessment
1)Preparation of ESMF
2) Preparation of
specific rural road
ESMPs
1) ESMF by FMAWR
through the FPMU
2) Specific feeder
roads ESMPs by the
Consultant under
the supervision of
the FPMU and the
SPIU
1) ESMF to be approved by
Bank and disclosed in Nigeria
and Bank Info shop before
project appraisal date.
2) Sub project ESMP’s to be
approved by the Bank, FPMU,
EnMOE, FME and SPIU and
disclosed in the State before
commencement of civil
works.
OP/BP 4.12
Involuntary
Resettlement
1) Preparation of RPF.
2) Preparation of Sub
project ARAPs.
1) RPF by FMAWR
through the FPMU
2) ARAPS by the
Consultant
1) RPF to be approved by the
World Bank and disclosed in
Nigeria and World Bank Info
shop before project appraisal
date.
2) Sub project ARAPs to be
approved by the Bank, FPMU,
EnMOE, FME and SPIU and
disclosed in the State before
commencement of civil
works.
Federal Ministry of Environment (1999 Presidential Directive)
The Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA) was established by Decree No. 58 of 1988 and
subsequently amended by Act 59 of 1992 with further amendment by Decree 14 of 1999. FEPA was absorbed
into the Federal Ministry of Environment (FMENV) in 1999 by a presidential directive and its functions among
others are now the responsibility of the new Ministry. The FEPA Act has now been repealed in the NESREA Act
No 25 of 2007. Though the FEPA Act has now been repealed in the NESREA Act No. 25 of 2007, the Regulations
pursuant to it are still valid in Regulatory terms.
The National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (NESREA) Act No 25 of 2007
The Agency, shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, have responsibility for the protection and development
of the environment, biodiversity conservation and sustainable development of Nigeria’s natural resources in
general and environmental technology, including coordination and liaison with relevant stakeholders within
and outside Nigeria on matters of enforcement of environmental standards, regulations, rules, laws, policies
and guidelines.
NESREA mandate includes the establishment of federal Road air quality standards and effluent limitations,
protection of air and atmospheric quality; protection of the ozone layer; control of the discharge of hazardous
substances; inter alia and ensures that all major development projects in Nigeria are subject to mandatory
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) pursuant to EIA Act. No. 86 (Decree No. 86) of 1992.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Act Cap 131 LFN 1992; This law makes it mandatory to have an EIA
study for any major development project likely to have adverse effects on the environment and seeks to
encourage the development of procedures for information exchange, notification and consultation between
organs and persons when proposed activities are likely to have significant environmental effects on boundary
or trans-state or on the environment of bordering towns and villages. The law prescribes the procedure for
conducting and reporting EIAs.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
18
Sectoral EIA Guidelines
In September 1995, FEPA (now Federal Ministry of Environment) published Sectoral EIA Guidelines for
Infrastructural Projects. The Guidelines are for any project that involves:
Coastal Development Project
Port and Harbour Development Project
Railways
Roads and Highways,
Airports
Urban development project
Domestic water supply and sanitation project
Electrification projects
Nigerian Urban and Regional Planning Law No 88 of 1992
Section 333 requires every developer of Land exceeding 4000 m2 or four floors to submit a detailed EIA report
to an appropriate Development Control Department in the area of project location.
Land Use Act Cap 202 LFN 1990.
As contained in the Land Use Act of 1978, which was modified in 1990 all Land in Nigeria is vested in the
Governor of each state, and shall be held in trust for the use and common benefit of all people. The
administration of land area is divided into urban land, which will be directly under the control and
management of the Governor of each state; and non urban land, which will be under the control and
management of the Local Government. The Governor of each state will have the right to grant statutory rights
of occupancy to any person for any purposes; and the Local Government will have the right to grant
customary right of occupancy to any person or organization for agricultural, residential or any other purposes.
The rational for the Act was that dispute over land were resulting loss of lives and properties; moreover, that
the management and ownership of land needed to be streamlined and simplified; and furthermore that
citizens, irrespective of their social status, need support to realize their aspirations owning a place where they
and their family can lead a secure and peaceful life. Therefore the twelve (12) sections found to be relevant
to the RAP purpose are hereunder stated.
i) Section 1: Subject to the provisions of this Act, all land comprise in the territory of each state in
the Federation are hereby vested in the Governor of each state and such land shall be held in
trust and administered for the use and common benefit of all Nigerians in accordance with the
provisions of this Act.
i) Section 2 (a): All land in urban areas shall be under the control and management of the
Governor of each state; and (b) all other land shall be under the control and management of
Local government within the area of jurisdiction in which the land is situated.
ii) Section 5 (1): It shall be lawful for the governor in respect of land , whether or not in an urban
area (a) to grant statutory rights of occupancy to any person for all purposes.
iii) Section 6 (1): It shall be lawful for a Local Government in respect of land not in an urban area (a)
to grant customary rights of occupancy to any person or organization for the use of land in the
Local Government area for Agriculture, Residential and other purposes; (b) To grant customary
rights of occupancy to any person or organization for use of land for grazing purposes as may
be customary in the local government area concerned.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
19
iv) Section 6 (3): It shall be lawful for a local Government to enter upon, use and occupy for public
purposes any Land within the area of its jurisdiction, and for the purposes, to revoke any
customary right of occupation on any such land.
v) Section 6 (5): The holder and occupier according to their respective interest of any customary
right of occupancy revoked under subsection (3) of this section shall be entitled to
compensation for the value at the date of revocation, of their unexhausted improvement.
vi) Section 6 (6): Where land in respect of which a customary right of occupancy is revoked under
this Act was used for Agricultural purposes by the holder, the local Government shall allocate to
such holder alternative land for use for the same purpose.
vii) Section 28 (1): It shall be lawful for the government to revoke a right of occupancy for overriding
public interest.
viii) Section 29(1): If a right of occupancy is revoked, the holder and occupier shall be entitled to
compensation for the value at the date of revocation of their unexhausted improvements.
ix) Section 29 (3): If the holder or occupier entitled to compensation under this section is a
community the Governor may direct that any compensation payable to it shall be paid (a) to
the community or (b) to the chief or leader of the community to be disposed of by him for the
benefit of the community in accordance with the applicable customary law (c) into some fund
specified by the Governor for the purpose for being utilized or applied for the benefit of the
community.
x) Section 29 (4): Compensation under subsection (1) of this section shall be (a) the land for the
amount equal to the rent, if any paid by the occupier during the year in which the right of
occupancy was revoked, (b) Buildings, installation or improvements thereon, for the amount of
the replacement cost of the building, installation or improvement, that is to say, such cost as
may be assessed on the basis of the prescribed method of assessment as determined by the
appropriate officer less any depreciation together with interest at the bank rate for delayed
payment of compensation and in respect of any improvement in the nature of reclamation
works, being such cost thereof as may be sustained by documentary evidence and proof to the
satisfaction of the appropriate officer, (c) crops on land apart from any building, installation or
improvement thereon, for an amount equal to the value as prescribed and determined by the
appropriate officer.
xi) Section 33(1): Where the right of occupancy of any developed land on which a residential
building had been erected is revoked under this Act, the Governor or the Local Government, as
the case may be may in his or its discretion offer in lieu of compensation payable in accordance
with the provision of this Act, resettlement in any other place or area by way of a reasonable
alternative accommodation (if appropriate in the circumstance).
In the event of use of land for public interest, the Act specifies as follows:
That the government should resettle and/or compensate occupants of land with
Certificate of Occupancy (C of O); or
Issue notice to occupiers of land prior to displacement of land for public project.
In practice, government does not compensate known rightful owners of land/asset when the affected
land/assets are located within the right of way of utilities. Rather, the government enforces involuntary
displacement by demolition the structures and assets that are located within the land mapped for project.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
20
The ESIA for this road project will be aligned with the World Bank Operational Policy (OP 4.01) which indicates
best practices to environment and social livelihoods of people affected by the implementation of the project.
2.3.1 Comparison between Land Law in the Federal Government of Nigeria and Bank OP 4.12
The RPF also presented a comparison of the Land Laws in Nigeria with the World Bank Policy. Whereas the law
relating to land administration in Nigeria is wide and varied, entitlements for payment of compensation are
essentially based on right of ownership. The Bank’s OP4.12 (Appendix 2) is fundamentally different from this and
states that affected persons are entitled to some form of compensation whether or not they have legal title if
they occupy the land by a cut-off date. However, as the proposed Road Rehabilitation is to be funded by the
World Bank, the principle of OP 4.12 is not negotiable and must be adhered to. As a result, the ESIA would
adopt the Land Use Act 1978 (modified in 1990) and where, there is conflict, the Bank OP 4.12 would take
precedence. The comparison is presented in Table 2.2.
Table 2.2: Comparison of Nigerian Land Use Act (1978) and World Bank’s OP 4.12
Categories of
PAPs/Type of Lost Asset
Nigerian Land Use Act
World Bank
Land Owners
Cash compensation based
upon market value
Recommends land-for-land
compensation, or cash compensation
at replacement cost.
Land Tenants
Entitled to compensation
based on the amount of
rights they hold upon land.
Entitled to some form of compensation
subject to the legal recognition of their
occupancy.
Land Users
Not entitled to compensation
for land; entitled for
compensation for crops
Entitled for compensation for crops, for
land replacement and income loss
compensation for minimal of the pre-
project level.
Owners of Non
permanent Buildings
Cash compensation based
on prevailing market value
Entitled to in-kind compensation or
cash compensation at full
replacement cost including labour
and relocation expenses, prior to
displacement.
Owners of permanent
Buildings
Cash compensation based
on prevailing market value
Entitled to in-kind compensation or
cash compensation at full
replacement cost including labour
and relocation expenses, prior to
displacement.
The ARAP for this road project will be aligned with the World Bank Operational Policy (OP 4.12) which indicates
best practices to rehabilitation of livelihoods of people affected by the implementation of the project. Hence,
where there are gaps between the Land Use Act (1978) and the World Bank Policy (OP 4.12), in regard to
compensation of PAPs, the World Bank’s Policy will apply since it is to fund the project.
2.4 Summary of World Bank Environment and Social Safeguard Policies
These are listed under Appendix E.
2.5 Conclusion
However, in spite of the obvious similarities between Nigeria’s EIA Act and World Bank safeguard policy (OP/BP
4.01) on environmental assessment, in the event of disagreements, the more stringent will apply.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
21
3.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ROAD PROJECTS
3.1 Ownership Status, Pavement Conditions and Intervention Types of Project Roads
Table 3.1 provides information on the existing ownership status, pavement conditions and the required
intervention types of the project roads. From this table and the recent visit to the sites, it is evident that all the
roads are currently unpaved and are essentially earth roads. Some of these roads are virtually impassable
during wet season and they provide access to state and federal roads. All the roads also provide linkages with
a number of villages along their routes. All the project roads are being proposed for upgrading to earth road
with a graveled surface course.
3.2 General Description of Project Roads
3.2.1 Description of Project Roads
Each road has identifiable origin and destination and there are settlements and villages between the two
points. The roads are mostly one lane earth road up to sub-grade level which comprises of good lateritic
material and some clayey material in some sections. Along each road are markets, houses, places of worship,
academic institutions and health centres. The roads are generally motorable, but some sections have been
damaged due to lack of earth or lined drains. Concrete line drains are very important in all the roads as the
earth drains are easily damaged due to loose soil of the gullies in the rainforest areas.
Some of the existing earth drains have failed because of lack of proper maintenance. During our
reconnaissance survey to the road our team of engineers discovered some culverts which are either silted up or
buried.
3.2.2 Existing Road Condition
The roads are mainly one-lane vehicle paths, very rough and not to modern rural road standards. Sections of
the road have rocky, lateritic and clayey sub-grade. The width of the road throughout the entire stretch is
bounded by either forests or farmlands. A certain degree of surface roughness and severity is pronounced
along the entire length of the road.
3.2.3 Pavement
The roads have never been paved. The surface roughness is fair but generally the terrain of the project areas
are a difficult one. Our visit to the project sites reveals that the dwellers along these road corridors have
problem in getting to other areas of the state in terms of transportation. They all have lateritic surface. Most of
the services are located in the villages on the corridor of the roads with electric poles and water main pipes.
From observation, the sub-grade will provide a sound bearing stratum for the pavement structure and traffic
load. However, on the road corridor exist various locations for borrow pit which by inspection are good for
construction purpose.
The maximum speed attained on all the sections of the roads was 40 km/hr. The horizontal alignment is very
poor and the transitions between the straights and the curves are not smooth enough as these have effects on
the driving characteristics on the roads. The existing vertical alignment is fair for safety and motorability. The
vertical curves have sharps slopes and do not provide adequate sight distance over crests. In addition there
are culverts at most of the sags thereby reducing significantly the number of swampy locations. The average
width of the roads for most part is 6 metres, especially in the villages and settlements and restricted to 2m-4m
along the bushes as the edges of the roads have been overgrown with weeds.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
22
There intersections that exist along the project corridors are safe and not critical as they allow for free flow of
traffic and have a good visibility. They have also been well channelized for easy and smooth flow of traffic. The
right of way for most part especially in the areas of farmland is limited. Within the village the right of way is not
limited as it is possible to obtain a width of 6m-7m at relevant points.
Table 3.1: Ownership Status, Pavement Condition and Proposed Intervention Type
Cluster
Description: Intervention Areas and Road Links
Owner
-ship
Paved
(KM)
Un-Paved
(KM)
Distance
(KM)
Interventi
on Type
1.
UDI Intervention Area
Rd 32 Umuabi-Ehuhe Achi Road State 0.0 9.48km 9.48km Upgrading
Rd 36 Abor Road LGA 0.0 4.46km 4.46km Upgrading
Rd 37 Egede – Awhum Road State 0.0 6.50km 6.50km Upgrading
Rd 39 St. Mary Ngwo – Nsude Road: LGA 0.0 6.25km 6.25km Upgrading
EZEAGU/OJI RIVER Intervention Area Upgrading
Rd 41 Ugwuoba – Nkwere Inyi- Inyi Road State 0.0 19.88km 19.88km Upgrading
Rd 42 Isu Abaraji – Akpugo Eze – Inyi Market Road LGA 0.0 12.69km 12.69km Upgrading
Total for Cluster #1 59.26kM
2.
NKANU EAST/NKANU WEST/ENUGU SOUTH
Intervention Area
Rd 13 UNTH – Enuguagu Ndiagu-Umuaniagu–Obe –
Amuri Road
LGA
0.0
11.88km
11.88km
Upgrading
Rd 18 Mbogodo – Obinagu Uwani Akpugo –
Ihuokpara Road
State
0.0
9.28km
9.28km
Upgrading
ANINRI/AWGU Intervention Area
Rd 23 Mamaku-Awangbidi-Nkwe-Ezere-Isuochi
Road
LGA
0.0
15.0km
15.0km
Upgrading
Rd 24 Uhueze Nenwe – Nomeh – Mburubu – Nara
Road
LGA
0.0
21.00km
21.00km
Upgrading
Total for Cluster #2 57.16kM
3.
ISI UZO Intervention Area
Rd 3 Neke – Umualor Road LGA 0.0 16.84km 16.84km Upgrading
Rd 5 Neke – Mbu – Ogbodo Aba – Obollo Etiti Road State 0.0 25.38km 25.38km Upgrading
Total for Cluster #3 42.22kM
4.
UZO UWANI Intervention Area
Rd 9a Ukpabi – Nimbo – Ugbene Ajima – Eziani Road LGA 0.0 28.62km 28.62km Upgrading
Rd 9b Ikwoka –Amagu – Ajuona – Akabusiyi – Obimo
Road
LGA
0.0
6.25km
6.25km
Upgrading
Rd 12 Adani – Asaba – Igga - Ojor State 0.0 9.94km 9.94km Upgrading
Total for Cluster #4 44.81kM
Grand Total
0.0
203.45kM
203.45k
M
3.2.5 Drainage
Concrete line drains do not exist along the routes at all, only earth drains which have failed are visible along the
project roads. However, some sections of some of the roads such as Abor and Mmaku-Awamgbidi-Nkwe-Ezere-
Isiochi Roads have unfailed line drains. There is need for new culverts in some sag locations in order to achieve
adequate draining of the flood run-off properly. Most of the culverts are silted up and it was gathered that
when it rains most of them are overtopped as they are inadequate in capacity to control flooding.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
23
3.2.6 Bridges
Some of the roads have bridges while some do not have bridges.
3.2.7 Description of the Proposed Works
The project roads will involve works at the pre-construction phase, construction phase and operational phase.
Pre-construction phase activities involved:
Location of borrow pits, Project-affected Persons (PAPs) and the affected natural and human
resources
Identification of environmental and social impacts and preparation of ESIA.
Preparation of ARAP
Location of sources of water to be used in construction activities; and
Road alignment survey and traffic survey along the roads.
Engineering design
Economic Analysis, Cost Estimation, Bid Document, Tendering and Contract Awards.
Construction phase activities will involve the following:
Construction/upgrading of all roads listed on Table 3.1 of a total length of 203.45km;
Placement of road signs along the road.
Construction of the roads in communities will also require the provision of some basic road infrastructure such
as road signs etc other activities will include:
Haulage of materials;
Construction of temporary work camps;
Earthworks; and Construction supervision and monitoring.
After road reconstruction, the following measures will be undertaken:
Landscaping on specific sites where necessary;
Tree planting along the corridors, and
Road safety measures, such as bumps and signage.
3.3 PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
3.3.1 Background Information
Nigeria occupies an area of approximately 924,000 square kilometers and shares borders with Niger, Chad,
Cameroon, and Benin. The topography ranges from mangrove swampland along the coast to tropical rain
forest and savannah to the north. The Sahara desert encroaches upon the extreme northern part of the
country while gully erosion threatens the carrying capacity of lands in the south. Natural resources include
minerals, forest and water resources. The forests provide hardwood that is widely exploited as timber-poles,
scaffolding planks and stakes and as fuel wood as well as fruits and seeds. Inland waters provide over 120
species of fish while aquaculture has been gaining much prominence in the supply of fresh fish. Nigeria is the
most populous country in Sub-Saharan Africa with about 140 million people. The population of Nigeria is
predominantly rural, with about 36 per cent living in urban areas. Nigeria has over 110 universities and boasts of
an educated labor force. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization rates Nigeria’s farmland from
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
24
low to medium in productivity, but notes that most of the country is cultivable and would have medium to
good productivity, if properly managed. The principal export crops are cocoa and rubber, which together
account for nearly 60 percent of non-oil merchandises exports.
The country’s proven oil reserve, located mainly in the southeast and coastal area, amount to an estimated
proven 32 billion barrels, sufficient to last for about 37 years at the current rate of production. With the
production of 2 million barrels per day (mbd), Nigeria is the sixth largest producer in OPEC. Proven natural gas
reserves are estimated at 174 trillion cubic feet (equivalent to 30 billion barrels of crude oil), with energy content
slightly higher than the country’s oil reserves. These reserves are comparable to those of Algeria, and will last for
110 years at current production levels. It is expected that the export of gas will be substantial after the year
2004. Nigeria is also blessed with abundant solid mineral deposits including coal, tin ore, kaolin, gypsum,
columbite, gold, gemstones, barites, graphite, marble, tantalite, uranium, salt, soda, and sulphur. The main non-
oil exports include: cocoa, coffee, copper, cotton, ginger, groundnut, groundnut oil, gum Arabic, palm oil,
rubber, soya-bean and timber.
3.3.2 Enugu State
Based on the 2006 National Population and Housing Census Figures, Enugu State has a population of 3,267,837
(1,596,042 males and 1,671,795 females) within a total area of 7,737.6 sq. km. This gives a population density of
about 429 persons per sq. km., which is high when compared with the average national density of about 154
persons per sq. km. Expectedly, population concentration is highest in the urban centres, with densities ranging
between 300 and 600 per sq.km. In a state where the great majority of the people are rural, densities affect the
intensity of land use and productivity of the land. Four population density regions are recognised. Areas with
over 600 persons per sq. km and between 400 and 600 persons per sq. km. make up the congested rural
districts. Farmland is scarce in these two high density areas. The medium density areas support between 200
and 400 persons per sq. km, while the sparsely settled areas have an average density of less than 200 persons
per sq. km. Enugu State comprises of five (5) urban local government areas and twelve (12) rural local
government areas.
Settlement in the towns is usually laid out in distinct camps and residential quarters. In Enugu urban centre, for
example, residences are delineated into the Government Residential Area (GRA), the Ogui, Asata, Uwani, New
Haven, Awkunanaw, Garki, Abakpa Nike and Ogui Nike Areas, the Independence Layout, the Colliery Camps,
China Town and the Railway Artisan Quarters. Some are high density, while others are medium and low density
areas. The rural settlements are dispersed over much of the farmlands. For almost every community, however,
there are vast unoccupied areas set aside as farmlands and somewhat far removed from the settlements.
These farmlands are called 'agu' in each case, and it is from them that most of the year's harvests are taken.
Rural settlement nucleations are the exception rather than the rule.
3.3.3 Need For and Objectives of the Project
The rapid growth population within the urban settlement has strained the existing infrastructure since
transportation in the state is predominantly land-based, and this is adversely affecting levels of efficiency and
productivity within the state. With the inadequacy experience in infrastructural development, there is great
need therefore for the government to develop a strategic approach in decongesting the urban area of the
state by the linking the suburb and the rural areas of the state with good road network in order to facilitate the
movement of people from the area. This will discourage the populace from migrating to the urban area to
settle thereby reducing the burden on the urban infrastructure.
Furthermore, the existing federal and state highways do not provide connections to the rural areas and there is
an urgent need for alternative rural routes to achieve the required network of urban-rural roads. The planned
project is therefore meant to serve as an alternative route for motorist in order to achieve a balanced road
interconnections in Enugu State
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
25
The need for the planned rural road projects is therefore clearly evident. Economic development is facilitated to a
very large extent through infrastructure provision and development, and specifically access to this infrastructure. A
well-functioning rural infrastructure system is crucial for the economic growth of Enugu State.
3.3.4 Benefit of the Proposed Project
There are several benefits expected to accrue from this project. The beneficiaries include the project
proponents, the State and the local economy. The following are some of the benefits of the project: Besides
creating opportunities for agricultural, commercial and business activities, the planned project will improve
access to the rural areas and act as a catalyst for rural economic empowerment.. In addition, the benefits of
developing the project include the following:
i. Improve the transportation of people from rural areas to urban areas and to improve the rural road network
in Enugu State.
ii. commercial activity will increase within the rural areas due to the planned projects leading to the creation
of sustainable jobs and employment opportunities;
iii. vehicular emissions and air pollution resulting from traffic congestion would be significantly reduced and
contribute to a cleaner environment ;
iv. Improve the socio-economic interactions within each village and its environs.
3.3.5 Value of the Project
The total cost for the proposed projects is yet to be determined as of time of this study. However, it is expected
that the value will include the cost of basic and detailed engineering designs, earthworks, construction and
other related activities. Of this amount, at least 45 to 50% will be injected into the local economy. Therefore,
the value of the project includes this injection into the local economy and the potential employment and other
benefits that are expected to result from the project.
3.3.6 Sustainability of the Project
The sustainability of this project is hinged on a number of considerations:
i. The commitment and interest of the government and people of Enugu State to solving the
infrastructural problems of Enugu State, as part of efforts towards turning Enugu State into a food basket
and encouraging accelerated rural development.
ii. The implementation Agency of the state government, SPIU has already shown high level of commitment
in solving the rural transportation challenges of the state with successful implementation of the rural
road maintenance strategy which confirms the sustenance of the planned project;
iii. The overarching desire of the average Nigerian especially the people of Enugu State to ease traffic into
the rural areas of the state, which will guarantee their support for the project;
Based on the foregoing considerations the project can be adjudged to have high sustainability likelihood.
3.3.7 Project Alternatives
Usually there are several alternatives to any project. The selection of a particular alternative is premised on
several considerations, including the desirability/acceptability of the project, the government’s position or
inclinations to the project, the potential environmental and social impacts of the project, the economic
viability of the project, etc. For the proposed roads rehabilitation project, a number of alternatives were
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
26
considered and these include: a no-project alternative; delayed project alternative; an alternative site and
the planned project alternative. A summary of these alternatives is presented below:
3.3.7.1 No-Project Alternative
This alternative assumes that the entire project concept will be cancelled and scrapped. This is an inferior
alternative when compared to the option of going ahead with the project. Although if this option is taken, it
would mean that the negative environmental and social impacts of the project would be completely
avoided, not implementing the project will also lead to:
(i) Continued lack of rural access and mobility
(ii) Continued lack of economic empowerment, development and transformation in the rural areas.
(iii) Failure to generate employment opportunities as anticipated;
3.3.7.2 Delayed Project Alternative
This option means that the project will not be implemented at this time; rather, a delay will be in effect until
such a time when certain conditions are met or requirements fulfilled. This kind of option is usually adopted
when there are regulatory requirements that need to be met, when the political and economic climate is
inclement for project implementation or in a period of war. Presently, the country is not at war. Similarly, the
government of Nigeria is encouraging and courting foreign direct investment (FDI) and socio-economic
development. The planned project can attract foreign investment, in addition to all the added values
indicated earlier. Therefore, delaying the project will in turn delay the realization of the positive benefits
expected from the project. In addition, given the very high level of inflation in Nigeria’s economy, a delay of
1 year could potentially cause up to a 25% increase in project costs. Therefore the option of delaying the
project is not an optimal one.
3.3.7.3 Alternative Project Location
A prior study identified the current routes as being one of the priority roads under RAMP. While there are
other route options, the costs, especially in terms of resettlement and compensation are quite high and
would render the entire project unfeasible. Therefore, the current project routes appears to be the most
expedient, based on the various considerations and as such, an alternative location will not be optimal.
3.3.7.4 The Planned Project Alternative
This alternative assumes that the planned project will proceed as conceptualized. This means that the rural
roads will be reconstructed and will cover a total distance of 203.45km. This alternative will also include the
construction of drainage along the route.
This alternative involves a lot of construction work, along with the associated positive and negative impacts.
The essence of a project of this nature is to ensure that activities are undertaken in a way that minimizes the
negative impacts while enhancing the positive impacts. To this end, there is a need for detailed description
of the project, so that any activity that can result in negative impacts on the environment (biophysical and
socio-economic) can be easily identified and remedial measures planned for them. A detailed description of
the proposed project is presented in Chapter Three of this report.
3.3.8 Summary
In summary, the selected alternatives appear to be the most optimal, which takes into consideration the
needs of the people and an economically profitable scenario. While it is expected that certain negative
biophysical and socio-economic impacts will be expressed by the project, it is certain that if adequate
measures are put in place to mitigate the negative impacts of the project, it would result in overall net
positive impacts on both the local and national economies.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
27
3.3.9 Environment and Social Management Planning, Review and Clearing Process
It is anticipated that the rural/feeder road will be implemented through a mix of contracts including normal
contracts for complete road networks and contracts supporting the development of labour based contractors,
as well as small maintenance contractors. In this context, the social and Environment management process has
involved the following steps and procedures:
3.3.9.1 Scoping and Screening
For the initially selected investments and in this report, scoping and screening process was carried out for all
proposed roads in each cluster. This involves: (i) visual inspection of roads and initial consultations; and (ii)
identification of safeguard issues for each individual road. Based on this, a Screening Report, has been
submitted in Tables AP1.1, AP1.2, AP1.3 and AP1.4 under Appendix 1 which include:
A summary of Environment and Social conditions for all individual roads, based on visual inspection
and consultations;
A summary of main Environment and Social issues to be addressed.
3.3.9.2 Project Categorization and Justification for ESIA
Each potential project road has been categorized, based on the visual survey and initial consultations. Project
roads have therefore been categorized into one of two categories. Based on the outcomes of the screening
exercise which have been tabulated in Tables AP1.1, AP1.2, AP1.3 and AP1.4. All the road projects in the four
(4) clusters fall under Category B and are qualified to be financed under RAMP II because their environmental
impacts are less adverse.
The Environmental and Social Impact Screening results came out with a B Categorisation for all the road
clusters and therefore a limited ESIA will be needed to assess the limited environmental impact on the
environment within the specific locations of the projects. The projects qualify for Category B because more
than 50% of the screening outcomes are “Nos” according to Tables AP1.1, AP1.2, AP1.3 and AP1.4 in Appendix
B..
3.3.9.3 Category B Project
A proposed project is classified as Category B if it’s potential adverse Environment impacts on human
populations or Environmentally important areas-including wetlands, forests, grasslands, and other natural
habitats-are less adverse than those of Category A projects. These impacts are site-specific; few if any of them
are irreversible; and in most cases mitigation measures can be designed more readily than for Category A
projects. The scope of EA for a Category B project may vary from project to project, but it is narrower than that
of Category A EA. Like Category A EA, it examines the project's potential negative and positive Environment
impacts and recommends any measures needed to prevent, minimize, mitigate, or compensate for adverse
impacts and improve Environment performance.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
28
4.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL CONTEXT
4.1 PHYSICAL SETTING
4.1.1 Geology
Enugu State occupies much of the highlands of Awgu, Udi and Nsukka. The hills are flanked by the rolling
lowlands of Oji River, Adada and Anambra Basins to the west, and the Ebonyi (Aboine) River Basin to the east.
The area contains about nine geological formations. From east to west, and in terms of age and sequence of
exposure, the formations are: The Asu River Group of the Albian (Lower Cretaceous) Age, made up of shales,
sandstones and siltstones. The sediments later become folded, giving rise to the Abakaliki anticlinorium and the
related Afikpo synclinorium both within the present Ebonyi State, as well as the syclinal basin lying between the
Niger and Eze Aku shales formation of the Turonian Age which contains shales, siltstones, of sandstones and
limestones. Awgu Ndeaboh Shales Formation of the Coniacian Santonian Age. Enugu Shales (to the North) and
Awgu Sandstones (to the South) lie along the same axis. They were laid in the Campanian substage. Lower
Coal Measures Formation (Mamu reformation) is of the Meastrichtian Age. This is the coal bearing formation.
False-bedded Sandstones Formation i.e. (Ajali Sandstones) is also of the Meastrichtian Age. The body of the
sand stone is thick, friable and poorly sorted. The Upper Coal Measures Formation (Nsukka Formation) is of the
Nadian Age. The formation consists of coarse sandstones or with shale intercalations and fragments of iron
stones and ferruginized shales and sandstones. It abounds extensively on the Udi-Nsukka Plateau where
differential erosion has left the resistant portions standing out as rounded, conical, domey, cuestalike,
elongated and sometimes a flattopped hill, some hundreds of metres above the ground level.These are Upper
Cretaceous Sediments which were probably uplifted during the Tertiary formation, giving rise to the Enugu
Okigwe escarpment in Imo Shale Clay Formation of the Pleistocene Age. It is about 1,000 metres thick and
overlies the Upper Coal Measures conformably. The Alluvium Deposits which belong to the Recent Age in
Enugu State occurs farthest to the northwest, and belongs to the Niger Anambra flood plain.
4.1.2 Relief and Drainage
All the formations trend generally north to south, and various prominent landforms and related features have
been carved out of them. The prominent landforms include the Nsukka-Okigwe cuesta which, in Enugu State, is
to made up of two distinctive features the Enugu and Awgu Escarpments and the Udi-Nsukka Plateau. The
scarpface of the cuesta landforms is formed by resistant sandstones of the Lower Coal Measures, while the less
resistant false-bedded Sandstones, form the gentler upper slopes and the crest. The escarpments are very
much indented by deep river to valleys, and intense gullying has taken place at the headwaters of most of the
streams. To the west and southwest of the Nsukka Plateau it falls gently towards the lowlands along the Niger
and Imo rivers. The plateau is very extensive, some 48km wide in Nsukka area and 16km in Udi and Awgu. Apart
from the residual hills, the plateau is also characterised by low density drainage and wide, flat-bottom dry
valleys. The dry valleys are thought to be former normal river valleys that later got dried up by infiltration into the
false-bedded Sandstones. Climatic change is another cause of dry valleys but, in the case of progressive
migration of the Enugu Escarpment, the alternative cause may be the progressive migration of the water table
caused by gullying and ravination. Enugu State is drained by one main river system, the Anambra Mamu River
System in the west. The Anambra Mamu River drains extensive areas of Uzo Uwani Local Government Area in
the north west and Awgu in southwest. For most of the rainy season the Uzo Uwani lowlands in particular, are
completely covered by floods. The impeded drainage of the soil provides a good environment for specialised
agricultural practices, especially rice and yam production, and fish farming.
4.1.3 Soils and Soil Erosion
The soils are made up of shallow and stony lithosols found on the steep slopes of the cuesta and often left
uncultivated, the ferrallitic soils, also called Red Earth or Acid. Soil erosion, both from physical and manmade
causes, is rampant in several parts of the state. It shows in rills along roadside embankments, in sheet wash
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
29
across compounds and farmlands, and in gullying, sometimes very dramatic, along definitive channels and
zones. The major gullies are concentrated on the edges of the highly friable sandstones which yield easily to
erosion and induce gullying even on slopes as low as 5%. About 65 per cent of the entire area of Enugu State is
affected by sheet erosion.
4.1.4 Vegetation
The vegetation on the highlands of Awgu and stretching through its rocky promontories to link with the
undulating hills of Udi, is of the semitropical rainforest type. It is characteristically green and is complemented in
the Nsukka area by typical grassy vegetation. Fresh water swamp forests occur in the Niger-Anambra Basin.
4.1.5 Climate
The climate is comparatively congenial, and particularly equable in the hilly and ecologically transitional region
of Nsukka. The mean monthly temperature in the hottest period of February to April is about 32.6oC and the
annual rain fall ranges between 132mm to 160mm. The rain is almost entirely seasonal, most of it falling
between May and October.
4.1.6 Ecological Problems
There are a number of ecological problems. Apart from soil erosion, there are the hazards of excessive
sandiness in the Ezeagu-Udi corridor, and rainfed massive floods of Uzo-Uwani area. Deforestation constitutes a
man-made hazard that has adversely affected ecological balance and agricultural prospects in the state.
4.2 SOCIO-CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT
4.2.1 Project Area Population
A total of two(2) communities which have identifiable social impacts within the two intervention areas through
which the roads pass were identified. Ojoo and Umuaniagu (Ozalla) were communities with permanent and
temporal structures that will be affected by the road projects. The populations of major communities along the
project roads are summarized in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1: Population Characteristics of Affected Communities
#.
Intervention Area
/Community
Population Characteristics
Actual 2006 Population
Projected 2012 Population
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
1.
NKANU EAST/NKANU
WEST/ENUGU SOUTH
Intervention Area
(Umuaniagu/Ozalla
Community)
Rd 13 1,152 634 518 1,376 757 619
2.
UZO UWANI
Intervention Area
(Ojor Village)
Rd 12 408 224 184 487 268 219
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
30
4.2.2 Demographic Characteristics of Enugu State
Based on the 2006 National Population and Housing Census Figures, Enugu State has a population of 3,267,837
(1,596,042 males and 1,671,795 females) within a total area of 7,737.6 sq. km. This gives a population density of
about 429 persons per sq. km., which is high when compared with the average national density of about 154
persons per sq. km. See Table 4.2 for more details on population statistics. Expectedly, population
concentration is highest in the urban centres, with densities ranging between 300 and 600 per sq.km. In a state
where the great majority of the people are rural, densities affect the intensity of land use and productivity of
the land. Four population density regions are recognised. Areas with over 600 persons per sq. km and between
400 and 600 persons per sq. km. make up the congested rural districts.
Farmland is scarce in these two high density areas. The medium density areas support between 200 and 400
persons per sq. km, while the sparsely settled areas have an average density of less than 200 persons per sq. km.
Table 4.2: Projected Population Distribution for the LGAs within RAMP Intervention Areas
#.
Local
Government
Area
2006
Populatio
n Figures
(A)
Area
Sq. Km
(B)
Popula
tion Per
Square
km
Projected Population (3% Annual Growth)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
2012
1 Aninri 133723 368.615 363 137735 141867 146122 150506 155022 159,672
2 Awgu 198134 447.17 443 204078 210200 216506 223002 229692 236,583
3 Enugu South 198723 70.98 2,800 204685 210825 217150 223665 230374 237,285
4 Isi-Uzo 148415 870.39 171 152868 157454 162177 167042 172054 177,216
5 Nkanu East 148774 708.515 210 153237 157834 162569 167446 172470 177,644
6 Nkanu West 146695 262.735 558 151096 155629 160298 165107 170060 175,162
7 Oji-River 126587 394.945 321 130385 134296 138325 142475 146749 151,151
8 Udi 234002 908.64 258 241022 248253 255700 263371 271273 279,411
9 Uzo-Uwani 124480 918.275 136 128214 132061 136023 140103 144306 148,635
Total 1,459,533 4,950 5,260 1503319 1548419 1594871 1642717 169199 174,275
The above local government areas in the six (6)intervention areas have a total population of 1,459,533
according to the 2006 population census. As shown in Table 3.2 population distribution varies within LGAs with
Udi having the highest of 234002 (2006) and Uzo-Uwani having the least of 124480 (2006). The projected
population shows that by 2012 Udi will have grown to 279,411. Both in and out-migrations are said to be
prevalent in most of the intervention areas.Out-migration is mainly by the youth, both literates and illiterates.
Major factors that account for the out-migration are; Search for employment and wealth, Pursuit of further
education, Search for better life in urban centres, Peer group influence and Move away from parental control
and traditions.
4.2.3 Education: Much importance is attached to education in Enugu State. Government is generally in control
of the educational institutions (except most of the commercial schools) and invests about forty-five per cent of
its annual budget on them. The commercial schools are owned by private interests. The state has more than
210 Secondary Schools, two Technical Colleges and 118 Commercial/Vocational Schools. Every community
has at least one primary school, and primary school education is tuition free. There are also a number of higher
educational institutions for the training of intermediate and higher level manpower. They include Institute of
Management and Technology (IMT), Enugu; and the College of Education, Eha Amufu. Two Universities exist in
the state; the Enugu State University of Technology (ESUT) with campuses at Enugu and Agbani, and a federal
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
31
university, the University of Nigeria (UNN) with campuses at Nsukka and Enugu. The Enugu State Government
has also established College of Education (Technical) at Enugu.
4.2.4 Health Care Delivery: The provision of medical facilities ranks second to education in the state's social
infrastructural priorities. Hospitals and health centres are provided in all the local government areas and
maternity homes in almost every community. There are also a good number of private hospitals and clinics in
the towns and villages. Teaching and Specialist Hospitals in the state include the University of Nigeria Teaching
Hospital (UNTH), Enugu which occupies a position of excellence in the treatment of cardiac diseases; the
Orthopaedic Hospital, Enugu and the Psychiatric Hospital, Enugu. In addition, the State Government has
established ESUT Teaching Hospital at Enugu. There is a Dental Training School at Enugu, and the Park Lane
Hospital, Enugu, is the state government's most highly developed general hospital. A Mobile free health service
is operated in the State to ensure that modern medical care is delivered free of charge at the grassroots.
4.2.5 Transport and Communication: A well developed network of roads connects important centres of
commerce and industry within the state and other parts of the country. The state has four major trunk roads:
Enugu-Abakaliki Road, which leads to Ebonyi, Abia and Cross River states; Enugu-Port Harcourt Road, which
passes through Abia and Imo States to Port Harcourt; Enugu-Onitsha Road which leads out to Delta, Edo, Ondo
and other western states and Lagos; Enugu (Ninth Mile Corner) to Makurdi Road which opens into far northern
parts of Nigeria. The roads to Port Harcourt and Onitsha are two-lane dual-carriage ways.
The former Directorate of Food, Roads and Rural Infrastructure (DFRRI) helped very much in the construction of
rural feeder and intra-community roads. Taxi cabs, buses and motorcycles ("Okada" or "Inaga") are responsible
for passenger traffic movement within the towns. In the rural areas, it is the motorcycle mainly assisted by
bicycle, and head porterage. Passenger service network is in private hands. Regular air services are frequent to
and from the Enugu Airport. The Nigerian Postal Services Ltd. has remarkably improved postal services in the
state, and a number of private courier services supplement the role of the Express Mail Service (EMS) of the post
offices. The state has a good federal-owned telecommunications system made up of telephone, tele graph,
telex and fax. Modern day mobile telecommunication firms such as MTN, Glo, Airtel, Etisalat etc are also on
ground providing mobile telecommunication services thereby linking Enugu State to other parts of Nigeria and
the world in general.
4.2.6 Tourism and Recreation: Tourism infrastructure is developed through the Enugu State Tourism Committee.
The Committee works with cooperating agencies in a determined effort to transform several attractive spots in
the state to viable tourist centres. In this effort, hotels, zoological gardens and amusement parks have been
built and developed. The Nike Lake Resort Hotel, a five star hotel built on the banks of the Nike Lake (known
locally as 'Gwurugwuru'), is one of such hotels. Zoological gardens are located in Enugu and the University of
Nigeria, Nsukka Campus. Amusement parks for public relaxation are to be found in several parts of Enugu and
other major cities. Important and revered shrines are preserved, such as the Omaba Opi in Nsukka and the "Ani
Agbogugu." These shrines contain within them awe-inspiring carvings and moulds, and other exquisite
symbolisations of the presence of deities, male and female alike. In the same way, there are sacred streams
regarded as the abode of some merciful gods and goddesses, and deemed to have curative powers. Visitors
make tourist pilgrimages to these streams among which are the Dugudu Lake of Umunkwo in lgbo-Etiti, the lnyi
stream in Oji River, and the Adada River of Nsukka. The Opi lake complex at Opi, Nsukka is another tourist
feature which excites interest: it consists of about eight lakes in an intricate arrangement, each inhabited by
crocodiles. There are sacred squares and hills, some regarded as the cradle and bulwark of the lives of
members of the community. Such areas are used only tor oath-taking in settlement of disputes. There are also
caves (Ogba) which inspire awe because of their natural structure, e.g. the Ogba Ebi of Odume Amoh, the
Ogba and Ekwu of Obodo Akpu in Nenwe, and the Ogba Ike of lnyi. The Ezeagu Tourist Complex combines a
cave, warm and cold springs and the Heneke Lake surrounded by variant vegetation of riverine lustre. The lake
is about three kilometres long. Galleries, art and craft shops, including works of contemporary art and museum
pieces, are located in several parts of the state. These include the art gallery at the Institute of African Studies
and the archaeological museum of the University of Nigeria Nsukka Campus.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
32
There are also royal houses, administrative buildings, traditional factories and military defence posts which have
some historical significance and cultural attraction. They have been identified by the Directorate of Culture
and the Antiquities Commission for preservation. These include the Chief Nwodo Royal House with the
complement of a Royal Cemetery at Ukehe, the iron smelting site at Lejja which dates back to the 15th Century
B.C., and the Iron smelting chamber at Umundu, Igbo Eze LGA, said to date back to the Iron Age. The
masquerade festival is easily one of the greatest tourist attractions of Enugu State. The government has
elevated it to international standards with the institution of the annual Mmanwu (Masquerade) festival held in
November each year. The major event displays a glittering array of no less than 2,000 masquerades in
resplendent colours, led through the major streets of Enugu by uproarious drummers in the company of
carvoting dancers. Masquerades from various parts of the country participate in the carnival.
4.3 NATURAL RESOURCES
The natural resources of the state include its vast agricultural lands, its extensive rainfed flood areas and its
forest and forest products such as the oil palm and lumber wood.
4.3.1 Agriculture, Forestry and other Basic Activities: Agriculture, predominantly subsistence, ranks first in the
people's economic activities. It can be divided into two types: Agriculture on the plateau is based on the
extensive cultivation of the conventional staples of yam, cassava, maize, sweet potato, grain legumes,
pawpaw, banana, plantain and vegetables. Income from the farm is supplemented by earnings from the sale
of products from local economic tree crops like oil palm, cashew, kola nut, coconut, mangoes, breadfruit
(ukwa), castor beans, oilbeans, et cetera. Most of these tree crops are located on the compound land farm
plots. Terrace farming is important on the hill slopes of Nsukka, Lejja, Udi and Maku. Livestock keeping is also
important. Floodplain agriculture is practiced in parts of the Niger-Anambra plains especially at Adani and
Omor. It is based on comparatively largescale cultivation of rice and yam, and also, fish farming.
A number of agricultural enterprises have been established to tap the agricultural potentialities. They include
the Ada Rice Production (Nigeria) Ltd. and the Enugu State River Project which are public production projects
located at Adani in Uzo Uwani Local government Area. Others are the United Palm Produce Ltd. at Ibite Olo,
Ugwuoba and lnyi, and the Premier Cashew Industry Ltd at Oghe. Public Participation in commercial private
agricultural production, that is, running joint ventures on large scale crop farming, livestock and fish farms and
in forest plantations with farmers, private entrepreneurs and corporate bodies, local or foreign, if possible by
public initial investment and Small Holder Agricultural Production, whereby the government seeks to emphasise
the role of the smallholder in the private sector are on groung. The projected agricultural development
schemes include: Irrigation (the Olo Kalawa and the Agba Umanakalawa Schemes) for maize, rice, tomatoes,
onion and pepper. Oil Palm Development in lnyi, Ugwuoba, Ibite Olo, Umulokpa and Uzo Uwani for which
about 2,800 hectares have been acquired, and 1053 hectares already planted.
4.3.2 Mineral Resources: Minerals abound in Enugu State although most of them are not yet exploited. Coal is
mined at Enugu. Other known minerals in the state include iron ore, silica, clay, kaolin and pyrite. Prospects of
the existence of petroleum and natural gas are being vigorously explored. Also the prospects of striking oil in
the state cannot be ruled out, apart from coal which is being exploited.
4.4 Summary of Socio-economic Data
The overall/summary of socio-economic data of the six (6) intervention areas are given in Appendix F under
Tables AP4.1, AP4.2 and AP4.3. For the purpose of clearity, the data have been divided into three parts as
follows;
(i) Accessibility and Mobility
(ii) Economic Efficiency
(iii) Social Impact
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
33
5.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATIONS
5.1 Public Consultations
To understand the biophysical nature of the roads alignment area the field team visited the site. A survey along
the roads alignment was done and observations made of human habitat, vegetation and existing ecosystems
and places of cultural significance among others. Thus, it was important to visit the site between 19th and 23rd
March, 2012 for route alignment identification, confirmation and conduct baseline studies. This was followed by
detailed site investigation for social and environmental studies carried out from 16th to 20th April, 2012 and
public consultations on 28th to 30th May, 2012. During the site visits, the team was also able to meet the relevant
stakeholders.
Public Consultation is a requirement for ESIA study by the Federal Ministry of the Environment and the World
Bank. The Consultant through the help of SPIU and community leaders held consultations with project affected
communities and persons living adjacent to the road alignments during the site visits. During these meetings,
the communities were informed of the environmental and social impacts of the proposed roads on their
farmlands, shrines and communal facility. Therefore, village consultations with the two communities
(Umuaniagu and Ojor) have been carried out and sensitive cultural and heritage sites have been identified.
The consultations were an “open” forum with any parties interested in the project invited to participate. A
number of smaller focus group discussions were also held with women and youth of the villages. The meetings
were well attended and the results of the consultation process are incorporated into the relevant sections of
this ESIA report. Details of the consultations attendees, group photographs and minutes of meetings are
included in Appendix D.
Additional field work, consultations, and meetings were undertaken by the Consultant supported by SPIU and
traditional rulers to the two specific project roads (Roads #12 and #13) in May, 2012. These consultations will
continue throughout implementation and ensure that a broader consultative approach is applied and is
effective in addressing community concerns and changes in design and construction.
Consultations have occurred with:
• Communities adjacent to or likely to be affected by the road works Umuaniagu and Ojor
Communities.
• Traditional rulers, and community spokespersons.
• Women’s Associations.
• Youth groups.
Meetings/Consultations were held with the communities where 100 community members were present at
Umuaniagu (Ozalla) and 40 community members were in attendance at Ojor. One major decision at these
meetings was the acceptance by the people of the communities for the roads to pass through their
communities. Men and women from both communities attended these public consultations.
5.2 Inventory of Potential Losses
The combined team of the Consultant and SPIU have visited each section of the roads to identify any assets
and people who may be negatively affected by the proposed road-works. An inventory of potential losses has
been developed for each section and had formed the basis of the ARAP.
The project road at Umuaniagu will have the following direct social impact on the community.
i. Three (3Nos.)Major Shrines on the RoW of the project road
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
34
ii. Cassava Farmland of an area of 4,500 Square metres.
iii. 281 Baskets of Cassava to be harvested from the cassava farmland
iv. 63 Oil Palm Trees
v. 54 Other Economic Trees
Also, the project road at Ojor will have the following direct social impact on the community.
i. Three (3Nos.)Major Shrines on the RoW of the project road
ii. Forty (40Nos.)Minor Shrines on the RoW of the project road
iii. Cassava Farmland of an area of 1,200 Square metres.
iv. Virgin land of an area of 3,600 Square metres.
v. 75 Baskets of Cassava to be harvested from the cassava farmland
vi. A Transformer to be shifted
The major environmental impacts and the indirect social impacts are listed in Chapters 6 and 7 of this ESIA
report
5.3 Community Concerns
Through the public consultation with communities along the road, community leaders and lead agencies the
following were some of the key concerns arising and that are similar.
Use of locally available human resources: Members of the communities proposed that both SPIU and the
would-be Contractor should ensure that skilled and casual labourers are sourced from the communities along
the roads. The Contractor should also use construction materials from local sources such as sand, aggregate
and stones.
Preservation of water facilities/sources: Sources of drinking water such as hand-dug wells and surface water
resources are a valuable source of water to the community and their locations are very close to the road. It is
therefore imperative that the contractor should deploy technical solution to avoid damage to these sensitive
facilities and resources.
Cutting down of trees: The rights of way of the roads will not encroach on most of the trees and where such will
take place adequate compensation will be made to the community or person affected.
Loss of farmland: The communities expressed concerns on the possibility of destruction of their farmland during
upgrading of the road. The Contractor should ensure that clearing of vegetation should be kept to a minimum
at road upgrades and in the borrow pits. Ultimately, the community support the improvement of the road since
it will bring about numerous social economic benefits along the entire road alignment. However, it emphasizes
the need to be involved in the overall project and more specifically in sustainable utilization of the available
natural and human resources. Local leaders are an entry point into the community hence the Contractor
should ensure that they are involved at all stages of the project specifically where the road passes adjacent to
their locality. In so doing, this will go a long way in ensuring the smooth implementation of the project.
Effects on cultural heritage: Community shrines will be affected by the road projects. These shrines will be shifted
outside the right of way of the road and the community will be compensated for such involuntary relocation.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
35
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
6.1 Ecological Impacts: Vegetation and Wildlife
Among the major feasible vegetation impacts is complete destruction of those species along the route and
infliction of mechanical damage on other species. This can lead to complete extinction of some species in
some particular areas. The destruction of vegetation along the route can engender soil erosion and
consequent damage to the existing road, especially where there are a lot of open soil surfaces. The
photoperiodism of many plants in the immediate vicinity may be further affected, if there are plans to work
more at night than in the day-time. It is expected that floodlights and campfires will clearly illuminate the
project area to facilitate project activities if there are going to be plans to work at night. With regards to
wildlife, some species currently inhabit the immediate project areas, as they are extensively bushy and records
little human presence most of the day. Thus, some species such as rodents, ‘bush meats’, rainbow lizards as
well as swift avian species, which can fly away at the nearest human approach are regularly observed in the
area. Destruction of the few trees and other plants along the project routes, that provide habitat for the wildlife
species could displace them and force the species to migrate. Human presence and activities along the
project route will scare wildlife and illuminate the area, such that wildlife species inhabiting adjoining areas, will
be physiologically stressed during construction activities. Mitigation measures for reducing and avoiding
impacts on vegetation and wildlife include:
i. Cleared but unpaved areas shall be revegetated in order to reduce soil erosion along the roadsides;
ii. As much as possible, clearing shall be limited to work-areas;
iii. As much as possible, site illumination shall be limited to areas where work activities are going on, so as
to minimize impact on photoperiodism of plants in the project area.
6.2 Physical Impacts
The small scale of the construction works proposed including limited cut and fill requirements and the proposal
to follow the existing alignment means that the impact on soils and erosion will be insignificant. As a result of the
upgrading works (sealing and improved drainage and culverts etc) there will be a significant reduction in the
existing level of erosion and sedimentation observed along the road. Dust nuisance particularly at roadside
settlements will be significantly reduced after the sealing of the roads.
For the clearing of areas adjacent to the road for the storage of materials, equipment and construction camps
(day camps and if necessary overnight camps) during construction site selection criteria should include
minimum vegetation clearance. The ESMP includes mitigation measures for these cleared sites including
drainage and rehabilitation post construction.
6.3 Hazardous Materials and Solid Waste Management
Potentially hazardous substances in the form of petroleum products will be used in the construction of the
roads. These substances include (but are not limited to) oil and diesel for equipment. Waste will be generated
by workers on site. Provisions for ensuring appropriate sanitary and solid waste management facilities, and
hazardous materials management procedures are outlined in the ESMP.
6.4 Impacts on Fresh Water Resources
The sealing of the roads, repair of culverts and consistent standard of drainage design proposed for the project
will result in better management of stormwater runoff in road reserve and where storm flows discharge to
surface watercourses. The impact will be an increase in the quality of water resources available for safe
drinking water to the communities and eco-systems supported by the water resources. The improved water
quality will also support eco-tourism activities around the State. The reduction in the sediment load carried by
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
36
the stream and rivers into inland waters also enhances the quality of coral and sea life. This has ecological and
socio-economic benefits related to tourism and supply of food-catch for communities.
Fishing, recreational and tourism activities are known to take place on a number of the streams and rivers that
the road crosses. Direct discharge of untreated runoff during construction to streams and rivers should be
avoided through the use of diversion drains, sediment traps, and settlement ponds (as appropriate to the
individual sites). These mitigation measures are identified in the ESMP. Constructed drains, as part of the
upgrade, should also carefully consider discharge locations and ideally should drain to land to allow for natural
filtration rather than surface water resources. The villages use a range of sources for water supply, including rain
water collection, groundwater and surface water from streams and rivers.
6.5 Impacts on Water Supply
Direct runoff from the road into the rivers needs to be prevented during the construction stage through
appropriate site drainage arrangements. This could be achieved through the use of concrete bunds or other
barriers around the bridge area that direct runoff into drainage channels that discharge into areas away from
the river on both sides of the bridge. This could be achieved through building up the road level across the
bridge to establish a drainage gradient that diverts runoff away from the river on both sides of the bridge.
Roadside drains should be designed to accommodate and channel the runoff away from the bridge. If the
above mitigation measures are properly implemented by the project there would likely be no significant
impact on water quality at the intake.
The project will not affect the quality of the water supply of villages located on or near the road. Any existing
community owned infrastructure must be protected from damage during construction and retained within the
new road. The potential pollution of groundwater sources that are used for water supply for villages during
extraction of material from quarry activity will be mitigated by measures and conditions required by quarry
permits. Consultation with the water utility of the State on groundwater systems is also central to preventing any
negative social impacts on groundwater supplies. The extraction of water for the compaction of the road
during construction from surface water sources may be necessary during dry periods. The quantity of water
required for compaction is also dependent on the frequency of rain. Due to the weather dependent nature of
the water take the location and quantity of water takes for the purpose of permitting will be determined during
construction. Approval for the contractor to take water in accordance with an agreed schedule of rivers and
quantities has been provided by the water utility for water use related to construction. The agreed schedule of
rivers and quantities of water required for construction will have to be approved based on the capacity of the
river to support this level of supply without affecting the quantity of water available for downstream users.
6.6 Construction Camps
It is proposed that the main construction camp will be in one of the villages and workers will be transported
each day to work site. The contractor may be required to accommodate up to 20 workers in each of the
construction camps. The contractor will access the need for these camps as the construction programme
develops. Construction camps normally include workers’ living and eating areas and the grounds where
equipment is stored and serviced. They often include areas where materials are stockpiled. The management
of the construction equipment operation and servicing should ensure the prevention of spills and pollution. The
ESMP includes provisions for ensuring appropriate sanitary and solid waste management facilities at
construction camps to reduce environmental degradation. Issues such as health and safety, risk of spread of
communicable diseases and stress on resources and infrastructure, potentially resulting in issues with
communities are also included. Water permits may also be required to supply both overnight construction and
day camps with drinking water if a new source needs to be developed.
Day camps will also be established for the storage of equipment and materials for each 5km stretch of road
being rehabilitated. These sites will also used by workers during breaks throughout the work-day. There will be
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
37
sufficient portable toilets located on the sites, a container and area for the workers to eat and rest. It is
considered that the temporary use of these sites will have a minimal impact on the surrounding environment.
The sewage from the portable toilets must be disposed of at a local landfill sewage treatment ponds. Sanitation
systems should be located at a minimum of 100m from surface water. Construction camps and the day camps
provide economic opportunities for nearby communities selling food to the workers. The ESMP includes
mitigation measures for mitigation measures for impacts of construction site activities.
6.7 Quarries/ Borrow Pits
There are a number of sources for the pavements materials available for construction of the projects. Firstly
there will some material available as a result of the construction of the road; where cuts are made the material
will be used as fill for base material. Additional material will be quarried from existing licensed pits at different
points around road. In view of the fact that there are a number of licensed borrow pits available for use by the
contractor it is recommended that these existing licensed pits be utilized wherever possible to avoid the need
for developing new pits, and the associated environmental impacts from clearing vegetation and extraction.
The decision of which quarries and borrow pits are to be used will also be dependent on costs related to
transport of materials from pit to site, extraction access to the pit and fees or royalties to be paid.
The Quarry Management Plan (QMP) to be prepared by the contractor will provide mitigation measures
relating to potential environmental impacts resulting from the extraction of material.
6.8 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts
Road improvements can lead to secondary impacts associated with improved access. Secondary impacts are
difficult to measure but can ultimately have more profound consequences on the environment than primary or
direct impacts. Over time they can affect larger geographical areas of the environment than anticipated.
Monitoring of these impacts over time is necessary to measure any potential impact. Positive and negative
potential secondary impacts may include;
Increased exploitation of natural resources such as forests and protected areas as these become
more easily accessed. This requires the relevant government departments to increase monitoring
and enforcement procedures for the protection of forest and protected areas.
Increased runoff from sealed road.
o Incremental changes within the watershed may occur as a result of a change in drainage systems
potentially generating additive effects resulting in damage to the function of ecosystems and
communities relying on the ecosystem’s service
o The effect of roadside drainage systems associated with the project are generally positive. Sections
of the road currently prone to flooding will benefit from the implementation of a properly designed
road drainage system.
Urban growth adjacent to the road.
o Vegetation clearance,
o Increased solid waste,
o Competition for water and land resources.
o Need for construction of improved services such as sanitation, power and telecommunications.
6.9 Air Quality and Noise Levels
The main impacts of construction activities on air quality will be in terms of gaseous emissions and suspended
particulate. The various vehicles and machinery that will be used during the various stages of construction (such as
tippers, pay loaders, graders, jack-hammers, etc.) will emit various gaseous pollutants such as NO2, SO2, CO, etc.
These various gaseous pollutants cause serious negative effects on air quality and human health. Also, dust from
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
38
stripping, grubbing and trenching for roadside drainage will result in the release of coarse and fine particulates into
the atmosphere and this will result in further degradation of air quality in the general vicinity of the project area.
Similarly, the roaring of various equipment and machinery, such as the jack-hammers, pay-loaders, tippers, levelers,
compacters, etc. will lead to an elevation of ambient noise levels in the immediate project area. Currently, noise
levels along the route fall below the 90dBA maximum recommended for 8-hr occupational exposure limits.
Mitigation measures for reducing and avoiding impacts on air quality and noise levels include:
i. The contractor will ensure that all project machinery comply with international emission limits. In order to
sustain this, all equipment and machinery to be used for project activities shall be regularly serviced and
maintained;
ii. As much as possible, all open soil surfaces shall be regularly sprinkled with water to reduce dust and
particulate generation.
iii. Project equipment shall comply with noise emission limits. This will be achieved by the use of
silenced/muffled engines. In addition, project workers, especially those who have to work in close
proximity to noise emitting machinery/equipment shall be provided with adequate hearing protection
devices and facilities.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
39
7.0 SOCIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Most of the existing roads currently provides the villages access to the headquarters of the local government
areas and the capital of Enugu State.
Households in each of the villages are mostly engaged in subsistence agriculture including growing of yam,
cassava, banana, maize etc.. Households in the villages have livelihoods associated with the forest including
harvesting of crops. There are small stores in the villages and some home-based shops or canteens operated by
women out of their kitchens.
Only a few of the villages are connected to the national electricity grid by PHCN; the other villages either
supply their own electricity with household generators or no alternative sources. Communication networks have
recently improved with the roll-out of the global system mobile telecommunication network which provides
cellular network access to the villages.
7.1 Contribution to Poverty Reduction
The project can contribute to local poverty reduction and improve the livelihoods and well-being of the people
in the project area by provision of income generation opportunities such as construction employment and
provision of goods and services to workers. It is expected that the SPIU will instruct that preference be given to
village workers where possible, and that un-skilled work be reserved for village workers.
The following guidelines are provided to assist in the implementation of the projects;
(i) Explicit prohibition of the use of foreign unskilled labour;
(ii) Limits on the import of semi-skilled workers where such workers already exist or can be reasonably
trained within the local areas.
(iii) Unskilled labour for the projects should be sourced locally in the first instance.
(iv) A balanced approach should be taken in procurement for retaining good local labour and provide
training with continued employment, where possible selected from local villages
(v) Payment of legal wages to workers;
(vi) No use of child labour for construction
(vii) Encourage the inclusion of women as well as the poor and vulnerable persons in the local construction
force
(viii) Equal wages for men and women for work of equal value; and
(ix) SPIU should also encourage the use of locally sourced materials in the road reconstruction to the
maximum extent possible.
Following reconstruction and sealing of the road, an improved flow of traffic, goods and passengers will
provide opportunities for those seeking employment or economic opportunities outside the villages. This will
help enable the transition from household level subsistence living to greater market production. Improved
access to health services and education opportunities for communities will also contribute to poverty
reduction.
Additional vehicles (cars and vans) into the project area will increase transport services for passengers and
cargo, reduce travels times for both vehicles and pedestrians, as well as reducing costs associated with vehicle
travel along the road (vehicle operating cost savings). The existing poor road conditions damaged vehicles
beyond the communities’ capacity to maintain them.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
40
Following completion of the construction programme there will be need for a maintenance program to ensure
the sustainability of the investment and improvements to access. By facilitating this program through the service
performance agreements with the Client there will be increased opportunities for the engagement of
community contracts through simple labour-based equipment support (LBES) methods. The main components
of the LBES approach include (1) introducing LBES methods of road construction and maintenance whenever
cost effective; (2) training and employing local small-medium sized community contractors, and (3) supporting
access to equipment through leasing, hire purchase and/or other methods. The contractor should undertake to
promote and support community road and bridge maintenance skills as part of its obligations to provide an
ongoing maintenance plan.
Participation in any proposed LBES maintenance programs will provide opportunities for women and men to
acquire skills in road works, which they could then apply to community-level infrastructure. Regular involvement
in economic activities empowers women in particular by providing an opportunity to earn money and to be
involved in decision making. Access to income provides women an opportunity to acquire productive assets,
further contributing to their economic empowerment. Overall, the community will benefit from the increased
purchasing power of the workers in their communities.
The potential economic benefits can be summarized and measured in terms of:
Improved connectivity for communities to health services;
Improved access for tourism related activities, and benefits to the tourism sector in general;
Induced agricultural production;
Time savings (as a result of improved travel and vehicle speeds);
Passenger and freight cost savings;
Vehicle operating cost savings;
Generated traffic; and wages paid to local labour during rehabilitation and for ongoing maintenance
activities.
7.2 Improved Access to Services and Facilities
During the construction phase the benefits derived from improving access will not be realized. Indeed it will be
important that construction activities do not unreasonably hamper access and movement of goods and
people around the villages during the civil works and road construction. The contractor is required to prepare
and submit a traffic management plan that will address this and must provide appropriate notice for any
approved disruption or closure.
During the operations phase, the social impacts and benefits in respect of improved access to services and
facilities are the same as those already described for poverty reduction. No mitigation measures are required.
7.3 Impacts on Cultural Environment
A survey of villages located near each road was undertaken to identify sites of cultural, historical and
archaeological importance that should be documented before the commencement of construction. The
results of the consultation with the chiefs and landowners were that two sites (Umuaniagu (Ozalla) and Ojor in
Nkanu East/Nkanu West/Enugu South and Uzo Uwani Intervention Areas) of cultural or historical value were
identified within the five hundred metre boundary from the road.
7.4 Health and Safety
The project’s construction phase can cause a range of health and safety impacts. The main impacts on health
and safety are associated with;
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
41
(i) Air pollution and noise;
(ii) Contamination of local water supplies (runoff from road works, groundwater contamination in
borrow pits and waste water from construction camps);
(iii) Risk of accidents at work sites;
(iv) Traffic safety issues; and
(v) The risk of spread of communicable disease is considered to be medium to high.
Observing general health and safety requirements, including provision of safety and protective gear an
equipment to workers, will reduce the risk of accidents at the work sites. If construction camps are established
they will be equipped with a health post, which will include first aid and basic medical supplies. To reduce the
risk of incidents at the camp or work site, access to any construction camps and work sites by other than those
authorized will be prohibited.
Mitigation measures for reducing and avoiding impacts on health and safety include:
Provision of adequate protection to the general public in the vicinity of the work sire, including advance
notice of commencement of works, installing safety barriers if required by villagers, and signage or
marking of the work areas;
Provision of safe access across the works site to people whose villages and access are temporarily
affected during road rehabilitation activities;
Use of signs and other appropriate safety features to indicate construction works are being undertake;
Adequate signage and security provided at the work camp site and prevention of unauthorized people
(including children) entering the work camp site or workshop area;
The contractor will include an environmental specialist to undertake environmental management
responsibilities such as preparing ESMPs, monitoring and also to address health and safety concerns and
liaise with SPIU and villages;
The contractor will provide adequate health care facilities including a health post and access to first aid
facilities if construction camps are set up. The contractor will provide construction workers personal
protection equipment and training of all in basic sanitation, hygiene and health care issues, health and
safety matters, and on the specific hazards of their work;
The contractor will ensure that no wastewater is discharge to local water bodies;
The contractor will ensure safe and clean facilities including sanitation and drinking water is provided
to all workers;
The contractor will ensure any borrow pits used for coronus and other materials extraction are properly
restored to ensure groundwater resources are not contaminated;
No site-specific landfills will be established at the construction camps;
Septic tanks and garbage receptacles will be set up at construction camp site camps, which will be
regularly cleared by the contractors to prevent outbreak of diseases. Waste will be disposed of at sites
approved by the Environment Unit, LGAs and local land owners;
Adequate signage and security will be provided at the work camp site to prevent unauthorized
people (including any camp) to ensure that disease vectors such as stagnant water bodies and
puddles do not form.
7.5 Traffic and Access Issues
The current design for the proposed works do not include significant road realignments so all proposed works
will occur within the existing road right of way. The contractor is required to submit a traffic management plan
that will address access and safety issues during construction.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
42
It is recognized that there may be some disturbance during this period therefore neighbouring properties,
though some disturbance during this period therefore neighbouring properties, though some distance from site,
and have been consulted. It is considered that the impacts will mostly be contained within the site.
Road improvement projects can also inadvertently cause adverse impacts on road and traffic safety as a result
of higher vehicle speeds due to improved road conditions. An increased traffic volume and possibility of higher
vehicle speeds can create the potential for accidents involving pedestrians. In the villages, children often play
on roads, and families traditionally use roads as a central area for social gathering, particularly in the evening.
Traffic speed, especially through villages, is a risk requiring management for the operational phase of the
project. In general traffic safety will be improved following rehabilitation and routine maintenance of the
project road, inclusion of the shoulder and minor widening of existing road formation where it is less than 6m
(within the RoW) to allow for safe passing of vehicles.
The design improvement that could encourage higher speeds will be mitigated through signage and physical
speed deterrent such as speed humps (favoured by villages consulted). A reduced design standard through
villages, which force drivers to slow down, is also acceptable national practice. Awareness raising through
village meetings and through road safety campaign and awareness is recommended to reinforce behaviour
change messages.
It should be noted that overgrown vegetation poses a traffic hazard, especially when it reduces sight lines
around corners. Vehicles are known to cross to the other side of the road to avoid heavily vegetated areas
along sections of the existing road, posing accident risks to oncoming vehicles. Clearance of road-side
vegetation should be included as part of the road maintenance program.
Mitigation measures for reducing and avoiding impacts on traffic and access include:
Signs and other appropriate safety features will be used to indicate construction works and
being undertaken;
Preparation (by the contractor) of a traffic management plan addressing access issues during
construction activities (as required by the tender document);
Provision of safe access across the works site to people whose villages and access are
temporarily affected during road rehabilitation activities; and
Consideration of a reduced design standard through villages, and/or inclusion of signage and
physical measures (such as speed humps and chicanes) to reduce traffic speed in the vicinity of
villages.
7.6 Risk of Spread of Communicable Disease and Trafficking
The transmission of communicable diseases such as sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and Human Immune-
Deficiency Virus (HIV) is a potential impact of the construction phase posed by construction workers engaging
in either commercial sex or sexual relationships with local people.
The high risk of spread of STI and HIV associated with a project is a function of a number of factors including;
(i) Lack of knowledge about the risk;
(ii) The length of time large and relatively mobile populations will be located in the project area; and
(iii) Engagement in high-risk behaviours (such as increased alcohol consumption and multiple partners
etc).
The project will require a construction workforce of approximately 80 people. The workforce is required for
supervision, equipment and vehicle operation, vegetation clearing, material sourcing, pipe and culvert
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
43
construction, erosion control works, pavement construction, bitumen spraying, management, as well as
ancillary works such as cooking, cleaning and security provision. This construction workforce could be located
on each of the project roads for 18 months.
Experience with construction camps of infrastructure projects in areas with limited health awareness, is that
during construction phase there is a risk for both the construction workforce and the communities along the
road. A STIs/HIV/AIDS awareness and prevention campaign in conjunction with the ongoing efforts of
Government, Donors and the NGO partners is considered to be the most effective mitigation of these risks.
Mitigating the risk of spread of STIs/HIV/AIDS during the construction and operation phase of the project
will include implementation of the STIs/HIV/AIDS awareness and prevention program for all major
construction and will include:
Provision for the contractor to ensure the construction workforce attends STI and HIV/AIDS
prevention workshops. The workshops will be delivered to the contractor’s workforce prior to
commencement of any civil works;
Village based community awareness-raising about transmission of STIs and HIV, reproductive
health and safe sex. The program will be implemented prior to contractor mobilization in the
area;
The contractor providing adequate health care facilities including an HIV/AIDS education post
and first aid facilities within the construction campsite; and
If required a follow-up awareness campaign at an appropriate time during construction to be
determined by the contractor and the provider
7.7 Other Social Impacts-Stress on Resources & Infrastructure
Workers accommodated temporarily in construction camps can place stress on resources and infrastructure of
adjacent communities, which could lead to antagonism between residents and the contractor. A typical
camp area will include a container for equipment adjacent to the road, a simple rain shelter and 2 toilets.
These areas will be determined in consultation with villages as they will require clearing of roadside vegetation
and possible temporary resettlement issues.
The provision of two (2) construction camps for the storage of materials, equipment and accommodation for
up to 12 workers may also be established during construction. Provision of water may also require water permits
to be sought from the water utility prior to establishment.
The contractor will where possible utilize the community contract system with the support of SPIU to engage
local labour to clear scrub and over-hanging vegetation prior to construction. This will reduce the pressure of
construction camps on the surrounding resources.
Mitigation Measures
If two construction camps (site office and overnight accommodation) are required the
contractor will provide temporary facilities such as health care, eating and sleeping areas (
including a cook and provision of meals), water and electricity supply, telecommunications, so
that existing facilities and services of adjacent villages are not over-burdened.
The contractor will be responsible for removing all temporary structures and reinstating the land
to its pre-project condition at the completion of the works for both day camps and, if necessary,
the construction camps.
Construction workers should be limited to project sites (immediate site of works on the road and
camp site).
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
44
Workers should be briefed on land owner and property boundaries and village protocol, rules
and terms of conduct (especially when addressing women and elders).
Contract employment rules will be enforced relating to any damage of productive trees and
gardens, and access to the beach, foreshore and freshwater springs.
SPIU to brief the contractor on the provisions of the consultation plan to allow the development
of a communications plan for outlining protocol between the project team and community, in
particular the contractors Stakeholder Liaison Manager, village chief and elders, as well as
communication between the contractor and project.
The contractor will be responsible for the behaviour of construction workers outside working
hours for those construction workers accommodated outside the site area. In the event that
there are complaints that will be dealt with immediately and seriously, by the contractor, and
the method of addressing the grievance will be relayed to the complainant. If the complainant
is not satisfied that the complaint has been resolved, the worker causing the complaint should
be restricted to working on another site. The lodgement and resolution of complaints will be
recorded and monitored.
Children and teenagers should be expressly forbidden entry to the construction camp. This
would also assist in reducing the risk of coerced or transactional sex and other forms of child
exploitation.
Access to the construction camp and work site should be carefully monitored. Only authorized
personnel shall be permitted entry into the construction camp.
The increasing demand for land as a result of improved access may have an indirect negative impact on the
land owners. The increase in land values in recent years has led to disputes within and between communities
over the rightful owners of pieces of land and therefore who has the right to lease land. These disputes can
fracture communities and result in expensive and time consuming court cases.
7.8 Gender Issues
Clear gender differences exist in terms of access to resources and entitlements. Current social, economic and
political indicators highlight the disadvantaged position of women in all areas. Women’s focus group
discussions undertaken during the consultations recognized the following issues underlying potential impacts on
women of the project.
The gendered nature of transport in the project area and the differential impacts of failing
infrastructure between the genders;
Women’s participation in construction activities; and
Role of women community contractors and the barriers they face in responding to the implementation
of a gender-equitable community road maintenance program.
The results of the consultations identified both negative and positive social impacts on women that could result
from the project. The main benefits of the project identified by the women related to improving their economic
opportunities as a result of greater access to the local government headquarters and the markets. There will
also be economic opportunities during construction with both traditional gender roles such as provision of food
to construction workers and potential for employment by the contractor related to construction.
Mitigation measures that can be included in the project to maximize benefits for women, and to
remove any constraints on the participation of women, can include:
Identify and remove any potential gender-bias within the procurement processes for
construction workers;
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
45
Provide training and information on LBES and maintenance procedures that address gender
issues including a greater focus on gender-balanced community participation, enabling an
understanding of the gender impact of failing infrastructure, and of the non-economic benefits
of investment;
Encouraging community contractors to include women;
Identify means (such as micro-finance or revolving credit schemes) to overcome other possible
barriers such as difficulty in securing the start-up capital that a small-scale contractor or
community contracting group requires to purchase equipment and tools and to provide
flexibility with cash flow (especially prior to first invoice being paid);
Support women’s involvement in economic opportunities along traditional gender roles such as
provision of food to construction workers while encouraging women’s involvement in less
traditional roles such as construction activities.
Requirement for equal work for both men and women;
Requirement for Contractor (construction) and SPIU (maintenance) to submit records of labour,
dis-aggregated by gender and origin.
The improved access to services and facilities in the villages have longer-term gender benefits of improving the
education and health status of women with increased opportunities of employment outside the village (in
addition all community members will also be able to access health services especially during emergencies).
The gendered outcomes of the project will be enhanced with women’s participation in construction and
maintenance activities.
With the implementation of LBES maintenance activities in the villages participation will need to be balanced
with the usual (paid and non-paid) workload of women and men. Women may be disproportionately affected
since in addition to providing labour, they will continue doing household chores and other unpaid work. This
means that they may experience even more fragmented use of their time and have less time for leisure and
rest.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
46
8.0 ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) identifies the potential environmental and social
impacts and outlines the mitigation measures for the identified impacts required for the project roads. The
Contractors will be required to produce an Environmental Management Implementation Plan (EMIP) for the
projects to detail how the Contractor will implement the specific site mitigation measures. This will be
completed and approved by the client prior to commencement of the upgrade works.
Institutional responsibilities and reporting and review requirements associated with all the road projects that will
be implemented under the RAMP2 are described below. This is followed by the detailed ESMP matrices for the
four road clusters (Tables AP2.1 to AP2.4) and Environmental Monitoring Plan its EMoP matrices (Tables AP3.1 to
AP3.4) for the four road clusters respectively.
The ESMP identifies the following:
i. Potential environmental impacts that need to be mitigated.
ii. Environmental mitigation measures that will be implemented to address the potential impacts.
iii. Authority responsible for implementing the environmental mitigation measures.
iv. Schedule for implementing the mitigation.
8.1 Institutional Responsibilities
8.1.1 State Project Implementation Unit (SPIU)
The SPIU will be responsible for ensuring that the overall project is implemented in accordance with the RAMP2
contracts and related agreements, laws of Nigeria and Enugu State, State ESMF and RAMP2 guidelines. These
include but are not limited to the following:
• RAMP2 Environmental Guidelines
• Government of Nigeria laws and regulations regarding the environment and social issues;
• Enugu State laws and regulations regarding the environment and social issues;
• World Bank Operational Policy (OP 4.12) on Involuntary Resettlement
• World Bank Rural Roads Checklist
• Gender Policy
The cost estimates for institutional responsibilities and training needs have already been taken care of under
Component #3 of RAMP2: Capacity Building and Project Administration and do not need to be duplicated in
this report.
8.1.2 The Engineer – Appointed Supervising Consultants on behalf of FPMU/SPIU
The Supervising Consultant will initially supervise the overall project works. At an agreed date, this responsibility
will transfer to the SPIU, with the Supervising Consultant providing technical support. The Engineer will be
responsible for ensuring, on a day-to-day basis, that the mitigation measures and monitoring activities identified
in this ESMP are implemented.
The Engineer will be responsible for the following activities:
i. Undertaking its specific responsibilities for implementation of environmental mitigation measures as
specified in Tables AP2.1 to 2.4.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
47
ii. Carrying out regular monitoring of the Contractor’s construction activities to ensure that the work is
carried out in full compliance with the ESMP and provisions set out in the contract.
iii. Holding monthly site meetings with the Contractor to review environmental performance and
compliance with relevant environmental mitigation measures specified in the ESMP, identify areas of
satisfaction and shortcomings in the Contractor’s work and provide guidance to resolve areas where
the work is deficient.
iv. Auditing the Contractor’s implementation of the Environmental Monitoring Plan (Tables AP2) including
facilitating and coordinating the environmental monitoring and supervision responsibilities of external
parties such as local communities and appropriate NGOs.
v. Prepare monthly environmental monitoring reports, and quarterly summaries for inclusion in progress
reports to FPMU and SPIU.
8.2 The Responsibilities of the Contractor
The Contractor will be responsible for:
i. Preparing an Environmental Management Implementation Plan (EMIP), which indicates how the
Contractor will implement the ESMP, namely the Contractor’s responsibilities as specified in Tables AP3.1
to 3.4.
ii. Implementing the relevant environmental controls and mitigation measures as set out in the ESMP
(Tables AP2.1 to 2.4).
iii. Quality management Plan to be developed for every quarry and borrow pits.
iv. Communication Plan for the project.
v. Following all reasonable directions and corrective actions given by the Engineer including co-operating
with the monthly site environmental performance meetings convened by the Engineer.
vi. Carrying out all works in such a manner as to cause as little impact as possible to the environment.
vii. Reporting on environmental issues in monthly site progress reports, environmental issues and complaints.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
48
9.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN
9.1 Introduction
The Environmental Monitoring Plan identifies the environmental monitoring requirements to ensure that all the
mitigation measures identified in the ESMP are implemented effectively. Environmental monitoring
methodology for this project includes:
i. Audit of detailed designs.
ii. Audit and approval of site environmental planning documents.
iii. With the communities and other stakeholders as required. Routine site inspection of construction
works to confirm or otherwise the implementation and effectiveness of the required environmental
and social mitigation measures. Non-compliance with the required environmental and social
mitigation measures identified in the ESMP will be advised to the Contractor in writing by the SPIU
including the Supervising Consultants as required. The non-compliance notification will identify the
problem, including the actions the Contractor needs to take for implementing the corrective action.
Environmental Monitoring Plans (EMPs) are given in Tables AP3.1 to 3.4 in Appendix C.
9.2 Contingencies, Complaints and Incidents
9.2.1 Environmental Complaints and Incidents
Complaints and incidents will be referred to the Contractor’s Stakeholder Liaison Manager or designated
Environmental Officer) for undertaking complaint/incident investigation procedures. In general the following
approach should be followed:
i. Log complaint/incident and date of receipt
ii. Investigate the complaint/incident to determine its validity, and to assess whether the source of the
problem
iii. Identify and undertake any action required
iv. Log the date of resolution
v. Report the complaint in monthly monitoring report including actions, resolution status and any
outstanding actions required.
The SPIU already has extensive guidelines for managing grievances associated with land and related assets
such as crops. Timely redress of any grievances associated with the road works is vital to the satisfactory
completion of resettlement and to completion of the program on schedule. The following Grievance Redress
Procedures are intended to complement the Government systems and to provide options for fast-track
resolution of grievances. Affected persons have the right to file complaints or queries in the event that there are
any grievances resulting from loss of assets or other concerns because of the road constructions. The following
procedures should be followed:
The aggrieved person should register their grievance with the SPIU.
i. Within five working days, SPIU will attempt to settle the grievance with additional explanation efforts and
some mediation with the aim of settling the dispute amicably. The contractor and the Supervising
Consultants may provide advice. In some cases, other Government agencies such as the Department
of Lands or the Department of Agriculture may be asked to assist or to manage the grievance under
their normal procedures. These agents will ensure that aggrieved persons have access to information
about their rights under the Government’s systems and these procedures. FPMU/SPIU may also seek
participation from its contractors.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
49
ii. In cases where a resolution is not easily found within the five days, SPIU may establish a Grievance
Committee comprising knowledgeable persons and community leaders, experienced in the subject
area and with skills in mediation to assist with the management of the grievance. Mediation meetings
will be held with interested persons. Government agents and chiefs should be encouraged to provide
their time for free as part of their contribution to the project. There shall be no charges for the aggrieved
person under these steps.
iii. Aggrieved people remain free to pursue their grievance under existing Government regulations or to
open a court case. Normal charges will apply. It is hoped that the mediation processes will provide
effective and quick resolutions so that lengthy processes and courts of law become a “last resort”
option.
At all stages of these procedures, special efforts will be made to consider the needs of vulnerable people
including sole supporting parents, and people with disabilities. Special attention will be paid to the special
needs of women and young children.
SPIU will establish a database to document all grievances and track their outcome, and summarize this
information on their website and in its regular reports to the FPMU and FMARD. The Contractor will be required
to be proactive in identifying and addressing grievances and to maintain a database and track and report all
grievances.
9.3 Reporting and Review
Throughout the construction period, the Contractor will prepare monthly environmental monitoring reports and
quarterly summaries for SPIU. The SPIU will in turn forward the reports to FPMU. These reports will form part of the
Contractor’s monthly and quarterly project progress reports to the Client, and will generally cover the fol lowing
aspects:
i. Description and results of environmental monitoring activities undertaken during the month.
ii. Status of implementation of relevant environmental mitigation measures pertaining to the works
iii. Key environmental problems encountered and actions taken to rectify problems.
iv. Summary of non-compliance notifications issued Contractor during the month.
v. Summary of environmental complaints received and actions taken.
vi. Key environmental issues to be addressed in the coming month.
The cost estimates for institutional responsibilities and training needs have already been taken care of under
Component #3 of RAMP2: Capacity Building and Project Administration and do not need to be duplicated in
this report.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
50
APPENDICES
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
51
1.
Table AP1.1: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SCREENING FOR CLUSTER #1 ROADS
A. General Information/Project Brief
1. Name of Project Road CLUSTER #1 Roads
2. Location of Project Road UDI & EZEAGU/OJI RIVER Intervention Area
3. Length of Project Road 59.26kM
B.
SCREENING QUESTIONS
Yes
No
N/A
Remarks
Project Location
1. What is the nearest habitation? Name type of premises House
2. Approximate distance to the nearest premises 85m
3. Is the proposed road on a slope? What is the angle of elevation? X
4. Adjacent to or within any Environmentally Sensitive Area
4.1: Protected Area X
4.2: Wetland/Floodplains X
4.3: Buffer Zone of Protected Area X
4.4: Special Area for Protecting Biodiversity X
4.5: Bay/Lagoon X
4.6: Rivers/Waterways/Canals X
4.7: Coastal Zone X
5. Affect to Natural Biological Environment
5.1: Wildlife Habitat X
5.2: Ecology of Fisheries X
5.3: Threatened and Endangered Species X
5.4: Trees on Proposed Road RoW X
6. Adjacent to or Within any Historic Culturally Important Site X
7. Any Health Centre in the Community? X Primary Health Centre
Name of Place Location (Chainage) Existing conditions, problems and causes of problems:
Dust and noise from construction activities may affect health of community and
health centre patients
Potential problem from road works:
Dust and noise from construction activities may
affect health of community and health centre patients
Villages along
the route
Villages along the
route
8. Any Displacement/Resettlement of Activities? Compensation Issues? X
9. Economics and Environment (List) X
9.1: Might the proposed activity cause elimination or relocation X
9.2: Might the activity cause generation of employment? X
9.3: Might the activity cause reduction in employment? X
9.4: Might the proposed activity cause generation of social conflicts? X
10. General (Positive Impacts) . Will the project create:
10.1: Create job opportunities to support the enhancement of living standard of the community X
10.2: Contribute to poverty reduction in the project areas X
10.3: Contribute to sustainable development X
11. Soil and Water Resources
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
52
11.1: Surface Water Hydrology X
11.2: Surface Water Quality X
11.3: Ground Water Quality X
11.4: Soil Erosion X
11.5: Geology X
11.6: Climate X
12. Environmental Hazard or Pollution Threat
12.1: Might the activity cause an increase or probability of increase of Environmental hazard X
12.2: Might the activity be susceptible to environmental hazard due its location X
12.3: Might the activity affect the quality of water resources within, adjacent to or near the project area X
12.4: Might the activity result in a deleterious effect on the quality of any water resources/watershed area X
13. Resources Conservation and Use
13.1: Might the activity affect commercial fisheries or aquaculture resources or production X
14. Air Quality and Atmospheric Environment
14.1: If the activity results in the generation of dust, will it affect the project area, immediate adjacent areas? Who readily? X Community, Hospital
14.2: If the activity results in the generation of noise, will it affect the project area, immediate adjacent areas? Who readily? X Community, Hospital
15. Community Facilities/Services/Open Spaces/Recreations
15.1: Might the proposed activity result in change in community facilities, services or institutions? X
15.2: Might any impacts to existing community structures/business enterprises or housing? X
15.3: Will the activity result in impact to lifestyle values system? X
15.4: Might any site/open space/use of access or recreation areas significance be affected? X
16. Visual Resources/Aesthetics of the Site
16.1: Might the activity cause a change in the visual character in or near the area through alteration? X
16.2: Might the activity affect views or access to views of natural or cultural landscape features? X
16.3: Might the activity introduce new materials, colours and forms to the immediate landscape? X
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
53
2.
Table AP1.2: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SCREENING FOR CLUSTER #2 ROADS
A. General Information/Project Brief
1. Name of Project Road CLUSTER #2 Roads
2.
Location of Project Road
NKANU EAST/ NKANU WEST/ENUGU
SOUTH & ANINRI/AWGU Intervention Areas
3. Length of Project Road 57.16kM
B.
SCREENING QUESTIONS
Yes
No
N/A
Remarks
Project Location
1. What is the nearest habitation? Name type of premises House
2. Approximate distance to the nearest premises 100m
3. Is the proposed road on a slope? What is the angle of elevation? X Road #23, Road #5, 30o
4. Adjacent to or within any Environmentally Sensitive Area
4.1: Protected Area X
4.2: Wetland/Floodplains X
4.3: Buffer Zone of Protected Area X
4.4: Special Area for Protecting Biodiversity X
4.5: Bay/Lagoon X
4.6: Rivers/Waterways/Canals X
4.7: Coastal Zone X
5. Affect to Natural Biological Environment
5.1: Wildlife Habitat X
5.2: Ecology of Fisheries X
5.3: Threatened and Endangered Species X
5.4: Trees on Proposed Road RoW X
6. Adjacent to or Within any Historic Culturally Important Site X Shrine with a tree
Name of Place Location (Chainage) Existing conditions, problems and causes of problems:
Three (3) major shrines are located within the RoW of the proposed road.
Potential problem from road works:
Destruction of shrines.
Umuaniagu
Village on Road
#13
Chainage 2+050
7. Any Health Centre in the Community? X Primary Health Centre
Name of Place Location (Chainage) Existing conditions, problems and causes of problems:
Dust and noise from construction activities may affect health of
community and health centre patients
Potential problem from road works:
Dust and noise from construction activities may
affect health of community and health centre patients
Villages along the
route
Villages along the route
8. Any Displacement/Resettlement of Activities? Compensation Issues? X Farmland & Palm Trees
Name of Place Location (Chainage) Existing conditions, problems and causes of problems:
63Nos. Palm trees, 54 Other economic crops and 4,500 square metres of
Cassava Farmland on the RoW of the proposed road
Potential problem from road works:
63Nos. Palm trees, 54 Other economic crops and
4,500 square metres of Cassava Farmland will be
destroyed.
Umuaniagu
Village on Road
#13
2+050 to 2+550
9. Economics and Environment (List)
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
54
9.1: Might the proposed activity cause elimination or relocation X See 6 and 8 above
9.2: Might the activity cause generation of employment? X
9.3: Might the activity cause reduction in employment? X
9.4: Might the proposed activity cause generation of social conflicts? X
10. General (Positive Impacts) . Will the project create:
10.1: Create job opportunities to support the enhancement of living standard of the community X
10.2: Contribute to poverty reduction in the project areas X
10.3: Contribute to sustainable development X
11. Soil and Water Resources
11.1: Surface Water Hydrology X
11.2: Surface Water Quality X
11.3: Ground Water Quality X
11.4: Soil Erosion X
11.5: Geology X
11.6: Climate X
12. Environmental Hazard or Pollution Threat
12.1: Might the activity cause an increase or probability of increase of Environmental hazard X
12.2: Might the activity be susceptible to environmental hazard due its location X
12.3: Might the activity affect the quality of water resources within, adjacent to or near the project area X
12.4: Might the activity result in a deleterious effect on the quality of any water resources/watershed area X
13. Resources Conservation and Use
13.1: Might the activity affect commercial fisheries or aquaculture resources or production X
14. Air Quality and Atmospheric Environment
14.1: If the activity results in the generation of dust, will it affect the project area, immediate adjacent areas? Who readily? X Community, Hospital
14.2: If the activity results in the generation of noise, will it affect the project area, immediate adjacent areas? Who readily? X Community, Hospital
15. Community Facilities/Services/Open Spaces/Recreations
15.1: Might the proposed activity result in change in community facilities, services or institutions? X
15.2: Might any impacts to existing community structures/business enterprises or housing? X
15.3: Will the activity result in impact to lifestyle values system? X
15.4: Might any site/open space/use of access or recreation areas significance be affected? X
16. Visual Resources/Aesthetics of the Site
16.1: Might the activity cause a change in the visual character in or near the area through alteration? X
16.2: Might the activity affect views or access to views of natural or cultural landscape features? X
16.3: Might the activity introduce new materials, colours and forms to the immediate landscape? X
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
55
3.
Table AP1.3: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SCREENING FOR CLUSTER #3 ROADS
A. General Information/Project Brief
1. Name of Project Road CLUSTER #3 Roads
2. Location of Project Road ISI UZO Intervention Area
3. Length of Project Road 42.33kM
B.
SCREENING QUESTIONS
Yes
No
N/A
Remarks
Project Location
1. What is the nearest habitation? Name type of premises House
2. Approximate distance to the nearest premises 150m approx.
3. Is the proposed road on a slope? What is the angle of elevation? X
4. Adjacent to or within any Environmentally Sensitive Area
4.1: Protected Area X
4.2: Wetland/Floodplains X
4.3: Buffer Zone of Protected Area X
4.4: Special Area for Protecting Biodiversity X
4.5: Bay/Lagoon X
4.6: Rivers/Waterways/Canals X
4.7: Coastal Zone X
5. Affect to Natural Biological Environment
5.1: Wildlife Habitat X
5.2: Ecology of Fisheries X
5.3: Threatened and Endangered Species X
5.4: Trees on Proposed Road RoW X
6. Adjacent to or Within any Historic Culturally Important Site X
7. Any Health Centre in the Community? X Community Health Centre
Name of Place Location (Chainage) Existing conditions, problems and causes of problems:
Dust and noise from construction activities may affect health of community and
health centre patients
Potential problem from road works:
Dust and noise from construction activities may
affect health of community and health centre patients
Villages along the
route
Villages along the
route
8. Any Displacement/Resettlement of Activities? Compensation Issues? X
9. Economics and Environment (List) X
9.1: Might the proposed activity cause elimination or relocation X
9.2: Might the activity cause generation of employment? X
9.3: Might the activity cause reduction in employment? X
9.4: Might the proposed activity cause generation of social conflicts? X
10. General (Positive Impacts) . Will the project create:
10.1: Create job opportunities to support the enhancement of living standard of the community X
10.2: Contribute to poverty reduction in the project areas X
10.3: Contribute to sustainable development X
11. Soil and Water Resources
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
56
11.1: Surface Water Hydrology X
11.2: Surface Water Quality X
11.3: Ground Water Quality X
11.4: Soil Erosion X
11.5: Geology X
11.6: Climate X
12. Environmental Hazard or Pollution Threat
12.1: Might the activity cause an increase or probability of increase of Environmental hazard X
12.2: Might the activity be susceptible to environmental hazard due its location X
12.3: Might the activity affect the quality of water resources within, adjacent to or near the project area X
12.4: Might the activity result in a deleterious effect on the quality of any water resources/watershed area X
13. Resources Conservation and Use
13.1: Might the activity affect commercial fisheries or aquaculture resources or production X
14. Air Quality and Atmospheric Environment
14.1: If the activity results in the generation of dust, will it affect the project area, immediate adjacent areas? Who readily? X Community, Hospital
14.2: If the activity results in the generation of noise, will it affect the project area, immediate adjacent areas? Who readily? X Community, Hospital
15. Community Facilities/Services/Open Spaces/Recreations
15.1: Might the proposed activity result in change in community facilities, services or institutions? X
15.2: Might any impacts to existing community structures/business enterprises or housing? X
15.3: Will the activity result in impact to lifestyle values system? X
15.4: Might any site/open space/use of access or recreation areas significance be affected? X
16. Visual Resources/Aesthetics of the Site
16.1: Might the activity cause a change in the visual character in or near the area through alteration? X
16.2: Might the activity affect views or access to views of natural or cultural landscape features? X
16.3: Might the activity introduce new materials, colours and forms to the immediate landscape? X
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
57
4.
Table AP1.4: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SCREENING FOR CLUSTER #4 ROADS
A. General Information/Project Brief
1. Name of Project Road CLUSTER #4 Roads
2. Location of Project Road UZO UWANI Intervention Area
3. Length of Project Road 44.81kM
B.
SCREENING QUESTIONS
Yes
No
N/A
Remarks
Project Location
1. What is the nearest habitation? Name type of premises House
2. Approximate distance to the nearest premises 120m, Approx
3. Is the proposed road on a slope? What is the angle of elevation? X Road #9b
4. Adjacent to or within any Environmentally Sensitive Area
4.1: Protected Area X
4.2: Wetland/Floodplains X
4.3: Buffer Zone of Protected Area X
4.4: Special Area for Protecting Biodiversity X
4.5: Bay/Lagoon X
4.6: Rivers/Waterways/Canals X
4.7: Coastal Zone X
5. Affect to Natural Biological Environment
5.1: Wildlife Habitat X
5.2: Ecology of Fisheries X
5.3: Threatened and Endangered Species X
5.4: Trees on Proposed Road RoW X
6. Adjacent to or Within any Historic Culturally Important Site X Shrine with a tree
Name of Place Location (Chainage) Existing conditions, problems and causes of problems:
3 major shrines and 40 minor shrines are located within the RoW of the
proposed road.
Potential problem from road works:
All the shrine will be destroyed.
Ojor Community
8+825
7. Any Health Centre in the Community? X Primary Health Centre
Name of Place Location (Chainage) Existing conditions, problems and causes of problems:
Dust and noise from construction activities may affect health of community and
health centre patients
Potential problem from road works:
Dust and noise from construction activities may
affect health of community and health centre patients
Villages along the
route
Villages along the
route
8. Any Displacement/Resettlement of Activities? Compensation Issues? X Cassava Farmland
Name of Place Location (Chainage) Existing conditions, problems and causes of problems:
1,200 square metres of Cassava Farmland on the RoW of the proposed road
Potential problem from road works:
1,200 square metres of Cassava Farmland will be
eliminated.
Ojor Community
8+825 – 9+075
Name of Place Location (Chainage) Existing conditions, problems and causes of problems:
3,600 square metres of virgin land to be encroached upon
Potential problem from road works:
Encroachment and loss of valuable land
Ojor Community
9+200 – 9+800
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
58
9. Economics and Environment (List)
9.1: Might the proposed activity cause elimination or relocation X See 6 and 8 above
9.2: Might the activity cause generation of employment? X
9.3: Might the activity cause reduction in employment? X
9.4: Might the proposed activity cause generation of social conflicts? X
10. General (Positive Impacts) . Will the project create:
10.1: Create job opportunities to support the enhancement of living standard of the community X
10.2: Contribute to poverty reduction in the project areas X
10.3: Contribute to sustainable development X
11. Soil and Water Resources
11.1: Surface Water Hydrology X
11.2: Surface Water Quality X
11.3: Ground Water Quality X
11.4: Soil Erosion X
11.5: Geology X
11.6: Climate X
12. Environmental Hazard or Pollution Threat
12.1: Might the activity cause an increase or probability of increase of Environmental hazard X
12.2: Might the activity be susceptible to environmental hazard due its location X
12.3: Might the activity affect the quality of water resources within, adjacent to or near the project area X
12.4: Might the activity result in a deleterious effect on the quality of any water resources/watershed area X
13. Resources Conservation and Use
13.1: Might the activity affect commercial fisheries or aquaculture resources or production X
14. Air Quality and Atmospheric Environment
14.1: If the activity results in the generation of dust, will it affect the project area, immediate adjacent areas? Who readily? X Community, Hospital
14.2: If the activity results in the generation of noise, will it affect the project area, immediate adjacent areas? Who readily? X Community, Hospital
15. Community Facilities/Services/Open Spaces/Recreations
15.1: Might the proposed activity result in change in community facilities, services or institutions? X
15.2: Might any impacts to existing community structures/business enterprises or housing? X Community Transformer
Name of Place Location (Chainage) Existing conditions, problems and causes of problems:
Community transformer on the RoW of the proposed road.
Potential problem from road works:
Community transformer will be eliminated.
Community may be cut off from national grid.
Ojoo Community
8+900
15.3: Will the activity result in impact to lifestyle values system? X
15.4: Might any site/open space/use of access or recreation areas significance be affected? X
16. Visual Resources/Aesthetics of the Site
16.1: Might the activity cause a change in the visual character in or near the area through alteration? X
16.2: Might the activity affect views or access to views of natural or cultural landscape features? X
16.3: Might the activity introduce new materials, colours and forms to the immediate landscape? X
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
59
APPENDIX B:
TABLE AP2.1: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) FOR CLUSTER #1 ROADS Potential Impact Mitigation Measure Performance Indicator Responsibility Cost (NGN)
Pre-Construction Stage
Spread of
STIs/HIV/AIDS
Implementation of awareness and prevention
program-contractor
Program implemented
Contractor
&recognized
provider
Direct provider
cost paid by
SPIU/FPMU
Implementation of awareness and prevention
program-community (villages)
Program implemented
Contractor
&recognized
provider
Direct provider
cost paid by
SPIU/FPMU
Social disruption due to
construction workers in
area, including concerns
about security, stealing,
and increase problems
of women
Villages and works site protocols and grievance
redress procedures discussed with communities
and workers; worker awareness campaign as part
of mobilization; prohibition on unauthorized
people entering camp site/ work areas
Workers awareness
program completed
Contractor,
SPIU,
communities
No marginal
cost
Local custom
requirements for access
through land, for
materials or discharge
Access through or to land to obtain materials or
discharge water etc. shall only be done after
consultation with FPMU, the Engineer, and in
accordance with the consultation plan
Relevant consultations
completed
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
Run-off from material
stockpile locations
Materials stockpile areas shall be nominated in the
stockpile plan and approved by the Engineer prior
to construction and managed (including slope
angle and run-off diversion ditches) to minimize
run-off to surrounding terrain
Stockpile plan prepared
and approved by
Engineer. No or minimal
observed run-off and no
increased turbidity in
rivers observed from
these sources.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Construction Stage
Borrow Pits and
Quarries
Use existing Enugu State Ministry of Works
(MoWI) and Infrastructure permitted limestone
quarries and borrow pits for road base materials.
Should the use of new or extended quarries be
necessitated, note that these require an EIA, EMP,
and permits in advance in accordance with
Government and FPMU guidelines.
For any proposed new hard rock (basalt) quarries
opened:
The approval of applicable land owners, lessee
(custom owners, province or MoWI ) will be
required before extraction of any material can
occur
A quarry permit is required pursuant to the
mines and minerals (Licences) Regulations.
This will require an EIA and EMP in
accordance with Government and FPMU
Guidelines
In accordance with the contract a Quarry
Management plan is required incorporating
details of quarry opening activities; quarrying
operations, quarry closing and site
rehabilitation.
Existing borrow pits
identified and QMP
submitted and approved
Quarry license obtained
Approval obtained
Quarry Management plan
prepared
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
To be paid by
Contractor
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
60
For all quarry operations (existing or new quarries):
Drains are to be constructed around the uphill
side of the borrow pit to prevent runoff
entering the area and will direct all runoff
away from the borrow pit into stable disposal
areas.
The base of the borrow pit is to be drained at
all times (to prevent build-up of still water that
provide a suitable environment for mosquitoes
to breed). The drains must not directly
discharge to waterways.
Borrow pits are to be situated well away from
groundwater wells and the water table level
managed to prevent contamination of
groundwater resources.
Overburden is to be stockpiled for spreading
in the borrow pit surface when operations are
complete. Runoff is not to pond in the
stockpiled area
The face of the borrow pit is to be stable at all
times
Blasting operations are to be carried out by
certified personnel. Where appropriate and/or
considered aesthetically desirable, areas that
have been quarried will be rehabilitated. A
rehabilitation plan should be developed in
consultation with the Environment Unit and
the local community. Rehabilitation should
include covering of the water table to avoid
future contamination.
Uphill drains
constructed.
Bottom drains operating
and no direct discharge
to water courses.
No nearby wells.
Overburden stockpiled
Borrow pit face stable.
Certified personnel
responsible for blasting.
Rehabilitation completed
in accordance with
Quarry management
plan.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Erosion or
sedimentation caused
during clearing,
earthworks or activities
in streams and rivers
Install sediment fences and/or sediment traps to
collect sediment prior to any site disturbance and
construction works and to be checked after each
rainfall
Sediment traps installed
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
No dumping of spoil on or extraction of material
within 100m of streams, rivers or coastal area
without correct Government permit.
No evidence of spoil
dumping or extraction of
materials at nearby
streams and coastal
areas.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
61
No run-off diversions to be directed to private
property, unless approved by a provincial
representative and the Engineer, and any run-off
management shall be consistent with the site EMIP
Run-off diversions
approved by Engineer
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Side slopes of embankments designed to reflect soil
strength
No slope failures
observed on side slopes
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Gabion baskets or rock rip-rap to be used around
bridge abutments as appropriate
Bridge abutments
protected
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Embankments and stream or river channels to be
monitored for signs of erosion
Site inspection records
indicating monitoring
undertaken.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Stones and rocks kept on hand and used in event of
bank or channel erosion
Stockpiles of rock and
stones around stream
courses.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Minimize size and duration of cleared areas
Minimal vegetation
clearance
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Retain topsoil (in stockpiles no higher than 2m,
away from drainage paths and including run-off
ditches) for use in re-vegetation as required
Topsoil stockpiles
observed.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Undertake progressive re-vegetation of cleared
areas if required
No exposed soil areas
following completion of
works.
Contractor and
Community
Contractors
No marginal
cost
Avoid clearing gravel or spreading activities during
rain or if rain is imminent
No gravel spreading
during heavy rain
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Vehicle traffic to be restricted to designated paths
within the site
Temporary traffic lanes
clearly designated.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Land and soil stability
related to proposed
drainage works
For all drainage works on assessment of impact on
additional water flows on stability of adjacent
slopes must be measured.
No land or soil stability
issues.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Water Quality
Install sediment fences and/or sediment traps to
collect sediment prior disturbance and construction
works and to be checked after each rainfall
No evidence of direct site
run-off into water
courses or resultant
increased turbidity in
these water bodies
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
Use of silt control grass (appropriate for local
ecosystems) to protect water supply from siltation
No evidence of runoff
into water bodies and
rivers/streams.
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
River, stream or creek crossing works should not
be carried out ( or works stopped) during peak
flows to prevent washout of sediment and erosion
control measures, and waste material affected
downstream users.
No evidence of
equipment or waste
material downstream of
site.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Sediment controls measures to be maintained on a
regular basis
Evidence of sediment
controls operating
effectively.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Placement of diversion ditches around stockpiles,
camp (day and overnight)
No evidence of direct
run-off from stockpiles
into water courses
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Rivers and streams to be protected from pollution,
silting, flooding or erosion through the installation
of sediment traps, ponds, silt fences and bunds
No evidence of direct site
run-off into water
courses.
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
Debris, spent fuel or oil, waste materials not to be
dumped near streams or rivers. Spills require
immediate attention including removal of
contaminated material (for disposal in approved
landfill) and remediation of the site to the
satisfaction of the Engineer
No evidence of dumping
site waste materials in
unauthorized areas.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
62
Interference with
existing infrastructure
(telecommunications,
electricity, water)
Site surface water including run-off of groundwater
seepage shall not be discharged directly to any
aquatic environment. If saturation occurs all work
in this locality shall cease and many only resume
on approval of the Engineer.
No evidence of direct site
run-off into water
courses.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Culverts to comply with design specifications
Engineer’s approval of
design specification
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Spoil and material stockpiles not to be located
within 15m of streams or rivers or drinking wells.
No stockpiles observed
within 15m of water
courses
Contractor
No marginal
cost
All waste-water and waste generated by the project
to be collected and disposed of in approved manner
and location
Solid and liquid waste
collection and disposal
system operating on site
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Run-off from potentially polluted surfaces, such as
vehicle and machinery storage areas, site huts,
construction camp etc., must be captured and
treated on site
Sediment and grease
traps installed around
plant maintenance areas.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Consult with relevant authorities (including village
water committees) responsible for utility services to
minimize physical impacts on public infrastructure
and disruption to services
No disruption to public
infrastructure or utilities.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Abandoned service infrastructure (as approved by
the Engineer) shall be cut (ducts, pipes or cables),
removed and stocked piled for later disposal
No evidence of
unauthorized waste
disposal
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Community or individually owned infrastructure
uncovered during construction should be protected
from damage. Consultation with the owner of the
infrastructure to determine whether infrastructure is
being used and should be retained within the new
road is required.
No disruption to
community or privately
owned infrastructure or
utilities.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
In the case of any disruption of utilities for a period
that has the potential to affect income generation or
health (water supply disruption) an appropriate
response (water trucks to deliver water or goodwill
entitlements offered ) must be facilitated by
Contractor.
No complaints related to
disruption of services to
households.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Soil contamination
from spillage of oil or
other chemicals or
substances
Provide protective gear and equipment as well as
education to workers handling hazardous materials
Store oil, fuel and chemicals in secure area/
compound , with concrete floor and weatherproof
roof and surrounded by bunds that will prevent spilt
oil, other chemicals or substances escaping to the
ground,
No evidence of oil and/or
chemical seepage into
ground around fuel and
chemical storage depots.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Develop a hazardous materials spill response/
cleanup plan to implement in the event of a spill
occurring
Spill response clean-up
plan available on site
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Health and Safety
Provision of adequate protection to the
general public in the vicinity of the work
sire, including advance notice of
commencement of works, installing
safety barriers if required by villagers,
and signage or marking of the work
areas;
Provision of safe access across the works
site to people whose villages and access
are temporarily affected during road
rehabilitation activities;
Adequate protection
provided
Safe access across the
works site provided
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
63
Use of signs and other appropriate safety
features to indicate construction works
are being undertake;
Adequate signage and security provided
at the work camp site and prevention of
unauthorized people (including children)
entering the work camp site or workshop
area;
The contractor will provide adequate
health care facilities including a health
post and access to first aid facilities if
construction camps are set up. The
contractor will provide construction
workers personal protection equipment
and training of all in basic sanitation,
hygiene and health care issues, health and
safety matters, and on the specific
hazards of their work;
The contractor will ensure that no
wastewater is discharge to local water
bodies;
The contractor will ensure safe and clean
facilities including sanitation and
drinking water is provided to all workers;
The contractor will ensure any borrow
pits used for coronus and other materials
extraction are properly restored to ensure
groundwater resources are not
contaminated;
No site-specific landfills will be
established at the construction camps;
Septic tanks and garbage receptacles will
be set up at construction camp site
camps, which will be regularly cleared by
the contractors to prevent outbreak of
diseases. Waste will be disposed of at
sites approved by the Environment Unit,
LGAs and local land owners.
Signs and safety
measures installed
Signage and security
provide for safety of
people.
Health post in-place and
functional.
Plan on wastewater
discharge submitted to
SPIU
Clean working
environment in-place
Borrow pit installed
Septic Tanks and
receptacles in0place
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
Traffic and Access
Issues
Signs and other appropriate safety
features will be used to indicate
construction works and being undertaken;
Preparation (by the contractor) of a traffic
management plan addressing access
issues during construction activities (as
required by the tender document);
Provision of safe access across the works
site to people whose villages and access
are temporarily affected during road
rehabilitation activities; and
Consideration of a reduced design
standard through villages, and/or
Signs and safety
measures installed
Traffic management plan
submitted to SPIU
Safe access facility
installed
Reduced design standard
submitted to SPIU
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
64
inclusion of signage and physical
measures (such as speed humps and
chicanes) to reduce traffic speed in the
vicinity of villages.
Social Impacts-Stress
on Resources &
Infrastructure
If two construction camps (site office and
overnight accommodation) are required
the contractor will provide temporary
facilities such as health care, eating and
sleeping areas ( including a cook and
provision of meals), water and electricity
supply, telecommunications, so that
existing facilities and services of adjacent
villages are not over-burdened.
The contractor will be responsible for
removing all temporary structures and
reinstating the land to its pre-project
condition at the completion of the works
for both day camps and, if necessary, the
construction camps.
Construction workers should be limited
to project sites (immediate site of works
on the road and camp site).
Workers should be briefed on land owner
and property boundaries and village
protocol, rules and terms of conduct
(especially when addressing women and
elders).
Contract employment rules will be
enforced relating to any damage of
productive trees and gardens, and access
to the beach, foreshore and freshwater
springs.
SPIU to brief the contractor on the
provisions of the consultation plan to
allow the development of a
communications plan for outlining
protocol between the project team and
community, in particular the contractors
Stakeholder Liaison Manager, village
chief and elders, as well as
communication between the contractor
and project.
The contractor will be responsible for the
behaviour of construction workers
outside working hours for those
construction workers accommodated
outside the site area. In the event that
there are complaints that will be dealt
with immediately and seriously, by the
contractor, and the method of addressing
the grievance will be relayed to the
complainant. If the complainant is not
Temporary facilities
provided
Removal of temporary
structures and restoring
the land to it pre-project
conditions carried out
Enforcement of
restriction on site
Workers adequately
sensitised
Contract employment
rules enforced
Consultation plan
communicated to
Contractor
Signed undertaking by
Contractor received by
SPIU
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
SPIU
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
65
satisfied that the complaint has been
resolved, the worker causing the
complaint should be restricted to working
on another site. The lodgement and
resolution of complaints will be recorded
and monitored.
Children and teenagers should be
expressly forbidden entry to the
construction camp. This would also assist
in reducing the risk of coerced or
transactional sex and other forms of child
exploitation.
Access to the construction camp and
work site should be carefully monitored.
Only authorized personnel shall be
permitted entry into the construction
camp.
Adequate notices placed
in construction camps
and security detailed
around camp.
Camp security put in-
place
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
Gender Issues
Identify and remove any potential
gender-bias within the procurement
processes for construction workers;
Provide training and information on
LBES and maintenance procedures that
address gender issues including a greater
focus on gender-balanced community
participation, enabling an understanding
of the gender impact of failing
infrastructure, and of the non-economic
benefits of investment;
Encouraging community contractors to
include women;
Support women’s involvement in
economic opportunities along traditional
gender roles such as provision of food to
construction workers while encouraging
women’s involvement in less traditional
roles such as construction activities.
Requirement for equal work for both
men and women;
Requirement for Contractor
(construction) and to submit records of
labour, dis-aggregated by gender and
origin.
Procurement plan
submitted to SPIU and
implemented
Training carried out and
information disseminated
Women included as
community contractors
Women engaged as
providers of traditional
gender roles
Equal work for men and
women given out
Disaggregated labour list
submitted
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
66
Air Quality and Noise
Levels
The contractor will ensure that all project
machinery comply with international emission
limits. In order to sustain this, all equipment
and machinery to be used for project activities
shall be regularly serviced and maintained;
As much as possible, all open soil surfaces
shall be regularly sprinkled with water to
reduce dust and particulate generation.
Project equipment shall comply with noise
emission limits. This will be achieved by the
use of silenced/muffled engines. In addition,
project workers, especially those who have to
work in close proximity to noise emitting
machinery/equipment shall be provided with
adequate hearing protection devices and
facilities.
International emissions
standards complied with.
All open places sprinkled
with water.
Noise emissions limit
complied with
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
67
TABLE AP2.2: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) FOR CLUSTER #2 ROADS
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure Performance Indicator Responsibility Cost (NGN)
Pre-Construction Stage
Spread of
STIs/HIV/AIDS
Implementation of awareness and prevention
program-contractor
Program implemented
Contractor
&recognized
provider
Direct provider
cost paid by
SPIU/FPMU
Implementation of awareness and prevention
program-community (villages)
Program implemented
Contractor
&recognized
provider
Direct provider
cost paid by
SPIU/FPMU
Social disruption due to
construction workers in
area, including concerns
about security, stealing,
and increase problems
of women
Villages and works site protocols and grievance
redress procedures discussed with communities
and workers; worker awareness campaign as part
of mobilization; prohibition on unauthorized
people entering camp site/ work areas
Workers awareness
program completed
Contractor,
SPIU,
communities
No marginal
cost
Land acquisition,
resettlement, tree, crop
and structure clearance
A number of potential losses and relocations have
been identified and will be addressed through an
ARAP.
ARAP implemented
FPMU,
Contractor,
SPIU with other
relevant govt
agencies
Refer ARAP
Local custom
requirements for access
through land, for
materials or discharge
Access through or to land to obtain materials or
discharge water etc. shall only be done after
consultation with FPMU, the Engineer, and in
accordance with the ARAP and the consultation
plan
Relevant consultations
completed
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
Run-off from material
stockpile locations
Materials stockpile areas shall be nominated in the
stockpile plan and approved by the Engineer prior
to construction and managed (including slope
angle and run-off diversion ditches) to minimize
run-off to surrounding terrain
Stockpile plan prepared
and approved by
Engineer. No or minimal
observed run-off and no
increased turbidity in
rivers observed from
these sources.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Construction Stage
Borrow Pits and
Quarries
Use existing Enugu State Ministry of Works
(MoWI) and Infrastructure permitted limestone
quarries and borrow pits for road base materials.
Should the use of new or extended quarries be
necessitated, note that these require an EIA, EMP,
and permits in advance in accordance with
Government and FPMU guidelines.
For any proposed new hard rock (basalt) quarries
opened:
The approval of applicable land owners, lessee
(custom owners, province or MoWI ) will be
required before extraction of any material can
occur
A quarry permit is required pursuant to the
mines and minerals (Licences) Regulations.
This will require an EIA and EMP in
accordance with Government and FPMU
Guidelines
In accordance with the contract a Quarry
Management plan is required incorporating
details of quarry opening activities; quarrying
operations, quarry closing and site
rehabilitation.
Existing borrow pits
identified and QMP
submitted and approved
Quarry license obtained
Approval obtained
Quarry Management plan
prepared
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
To be paid by
Contractor
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
68
For all quarry operations (existing or new quarries):
Drains are to be constructed around the uphill
side of the borrow pit to prevent runoff
entering the area and will direct all runoff
away from the borrow pit into stable disposal
areas.
The base of the borrow pit is to be drained at
all times (to prevent build-up of still water that
provide a suitable environment for mosquitoes
to breed). The drains must not directly
discharge to waterways.
Borrow pits are to be situated well away from
groundwater wells and the water table level
managed to prevent contamination of
groundwater resources.
Overburden is to be stockpiled for spreading
in the borrow pit surface when operations are
complete. Runoff is not to pond in the
stockpiled area
The face of the borrow pit is to be stable at all
times
Blasting operations are to be carried out by
certified personnel. Where appropriate and/or
considered aesthetically desirable, areas that
have been quarried will be rehabilitated. A
rehabilitation plan should be developed in
consultation with the Environment Unit and
the local community. Rehabilitation should
include covering of the water table to avoid
future contamination.
Uphill drains
constructed.
Bottom drains operating
and no direct discharge
to water courses.
No nearby wells.
Overburden stockpiled
Borrow pit face stable.
Certified personnel
responsible for blasting.
Rehabilitation completed
in accordance with
Quarry management
plan.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Erosion or
sedimentation caused
during clearing,
earthworks or activities
in streams and rivers
Install sediment fences and/or sediment traps to
collect sediment prior to any site disturbance and
construction works and to be checked after each
rainfall
Sediment traps installed
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
No dumping of spoil on or extraction of material
within 100m of streams, rivers or coastal area
without correct Government permit.
No evidence of spoil
dumping or extraction of
materials at nearby
streams and coastal
areas.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
69
No run-off diversions to be directed to private
property, unless approved by a provincial
representative and the Engineer, and any run-off
management shall be consistent with the site EMIP
Run-off diversions
approved by Engineer
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Side slopes of embankments designed to reflect soil
strength
No slope failures
observed on side slopes
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Gabion baskets or rock rip-rap to be used around
bridge abutments as appropriate
Bridge abutments
protected
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Embankments and stream or river channels to be
monitored for signs of erosion
Site inspection records
indicating monitoring
undertaken.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Stones and rocks kept on hand and used in event of
bank or channel erosion
Stockpiles of rock and
stones around stream
courses.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Minimize size and duration of cleared areas
Minimal vegetation
clearance
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Retain topsoil (in stockpiles no higher than 2m,
away from drainage paths and including run-off
ditches) for use in re-vegetation as required
Topsoil stockpiles
observed.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Undertake progressive re-vegetation of cleared
areas if required
No exposed soil areas
following completion of
works.
Contractor and
Community
Contractors
No marginal
cost
Avoid clearing gravel or spreading activities during
rain or if rain is imminent
No gravel spreading
during heavy rain
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Vehicle traffic to be restricted to designated paths
within the site
Temporary traffic lanes
clearly designated.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Land and soil stability
related to proposed
drainage works
For all drainage works on assessment of impact on
additional water flows on stability of adjacent
slopes must be measured.
No land or soil stability
issues.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Water Quality
Install sediment fences and/or sediment traps to
collect sediment prior disturbance and construction
works and to be checked after each rainfall
No evidence of direct site
run-off into water
courses or resultant
increased turbidity in
these water bodies
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
Use of silt control grass (appropriate for local
ecosystems) to protect water supply from siltation
No evidence of runoff
into water bodies and
rivers/streams.
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
River, stream or creek crossing works should not
be carried out ( or works stopped) during peak
flows to prevent washout of sediment and erosion
control measures, and waste material affected
downstream users.
No evidence of
equipment or waste
material downstream of
site.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Sediment controls measures to be maintained on a
regular basis
Evidence of sediment
controls operating
effectively.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Placement of diversion ditches around stockpiles,
camp (day and overnight)
No evidence of direct
run-off from stockpiles
into water courses
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Rivers and streams to be protected from pollution,
silting, flooding or erosion through the installation
of sediment traps, ponds, silt fences and bunds
No evidence of direct site
run-off into water
courses.
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
Debris, spent fuel or oil, waste materials not to be
dumped near streams or rivers. Spills require
immediate attention including removal of
contaminated material (for disposal in approved
landfill) and remediation of the site to the
satisfaction of the Engineer
No evidence of dumping
site waste materials in
unauthorized areas.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
70
Interference with
existing infrastructure
(telecommunications,
electricity, water)
Site surface water including run-off of groundwater
seepage shall not be discharged directly to any
aquatic environment. If saturation occurs all work
in this locality shall cease and many only resume
on approval of the Engineer.
No evidence of direct site
run-off into water
courses.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Culverts to comply with design specifications
Engineer’s approval of
design specification
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Spoil and material stockpiles not to be located
within 15m of streams or rivers or drinking wells.
No stockpiles observed
within 15m of water
courses
Contractor
No marginal
cost
All waste-water and waste generated by the project
to be collected and disposed of in approved manner
and location
Solid and liquid waste
collection and disposal
system operating on site
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Run-off from potentially polluted surfaces, such as
vehicle and machinery storage areas, site huts,
construction camp etc., must be captured and
treated on site
Sediment and grease
traps installed around
plant maintenance areas.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Consult with relevant authorities (including village
water committees) responsible for utility services to
minimize physical impacts on public infrastructure
and disruption to services
No disruption to public
infrastructure or utilities.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Abandoned service infrastructure (as approved by
the Engineer) shall be cut (ducts, pipes or cables),
removed and stocked piled for later disposal
No evidence of
unauthorized waste
disposal
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Community or individually owned infrastructure
uncovered during construction should be protected
from damage. Consultation with the owner of the
infrastructure to determine whether infrastructure is
being used and should be retained within the new
road is required.
No disruption to
community or privately
owned infrastructure or
utilities.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
In the case of any disruption of utilities for a period
that has the potential to affect income generation or
health (water supply disruption) an appropriate
response (water trucks to deliver water or goodwill
entitlements offered ) must be facilitated by
Contractor.
No complaints related to
disruption of services to
households.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Soil contamination
from spillage of oil or
other chemicals or
substances
Provide protective gear and equipment as well as
education to workers handling hazardous materials
Store oil, fuel and chemicals in secure area/
compound , with concrete floor and weatherproof
roof and surrounded by bunds that will prevent spilt
oil, other chemicals or substances escaping to the
ground,
No evidence of oil and/or
chemical seepage into
ground around fuel and
chemical storage depots.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Develop a hazardous materials spill response/
cleanup plan to implement in the event of a spill
occurring
Spill response clean-up
plan available on site
Contractor
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
71
Health and Safety
Provision of adequate protection to the
general public in the vicinity of the work
sire, including advance notice of
commencement of works, installing
safety barriers if required by villagers,
and signage or marking of the work
areas;
Provision of safe access across the works
site to people whose villages and access
are temporarily affected during road
rehabilitation activities;
Use of signs and other appropriate safety
features to indicate construction works
are being undertake;
Adequate signage and security provided
at the work camp site and prevention of
unauthorized people (including children)
entering the work camp site or workshop
area;
The contractor will provide adequate
health care facilities including a health
post and access to first aid facilities if
construction camps are set up. The
contractor will provide construction
workers personal protection equipment
and training of all in basic sanitation,
hygiene and health care issues, health and
safety matters, and on the specific
hazards of their work;
The contractor will ensure that no
wastewater is discharge to local water
bodies;
The contractor will ensure safe and clean
facilities including sanitation and
drinking water is provided to all workers;
The contractor will ensure any borrow
pits used for coronus and other materials
extraction are properly restored to ensure
groundwater resources are not
contaminated;
No site-specific landfills will be
established at the construction camps;
Septic tanks and garbage receptacles will
be set up at construction camp site
camps, which will be regularly cleared by
the contractors to prevent outbreak of
diseases. Waste will be disposed of at
sites approved by the Environment Unit,
LGAs and local land owners.
Adequate protection
provided
Safe access across the
works site provided
Signs and safety
measures installed
Signage and security
provide for safety of
people.
Health post in-place and
functional.
Plan on wastewater
discharge submitted to
SPIU
Clean working
environment in-place
Borrow pit installed
Septic Tanks and
receptacles in0place
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
Traffic and Access
Issues
Signs and other appropriate safety
features will be used to indicate
Signs and safety
measures installed
Contractor
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
72
construction works and being undertaken;
Preparation (by the contractor) of a traffic
management plan addressing access
issues during construction activities (as
required by the tender document);
Provision of safe access across the works
site to people whose villages and access
are temporarily affected during road
rehabilitation activities; and
Consideration of a reduced design
standard through villages, and/or
inclusion of signage and physical
measures (such as speed humps and
chicanes) to reduce traffic speed in the
vicinity of villages.
Traffic management plan
submitted to SPIU
Safe access facility
installed
Reduced design standard
submitted to SPIU
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
Social Impacts-Stress
on Resources &
Infrastructure
If two construction camps (site office and
overnight accommodation) are required the
contractor will provide temporary facilities
such as health care, eating and sleeping areas (
including a cook and provision of meals),
water and electricity supply,
telecommunications, so that existing facilities
and services of adjacent villages are not over-
burdened.
The contractor will be responsible for
removing all temporary structures and
reinstating the land to its pre-project condition
at the completion of the works for both day
camps and, if necessary, the construction
camps.
Construction workers should be limited to
project sites (immediate site of works on the
road and camp site).
Workers should be briefed on land owner and
property boundaries and village protocol, rules
and terms of conduct (especially when
addressing women and elders).
Contract employment rules will be enforced
relating to any damage of productive trees and
gardens, and access to the beach, foreshore
and freshwater springs.
SPIU to brief the contractor on the provisions
of the consultation plan to allow the
development of a communications plan for
outlining protocol between the project team
and community, in particular the contractors
Stakeholder Liaison Manager, village chief
and elders, as well as communication between
the contractor and project. The contractor will be responsible for the
behaviour of construction workers outside
working hours for those construction workers
accommodated outside the site area. In the
event that there are complaints that will be
dealt with immediately and seriously, by the
contractor, and the method of addressing the
grievance will be relayed to the complainant.
Temporary facilities
provided
Removal of temporary
structures and restoring
the land to it pre-project
conditions carried out
Enforcement of
restriction on site
Workers adequately
sensitised
Contract employment
rules enforced
Consultation plan
communicated to
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
SPIU
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
73
If the complainant is not satisfied that the
complaint has been resolved, the worker
causing the complaint should be restricted to
working on another site. The lodgement and
resolution of complaints will be recorded and
monitored.
Children and teenagers should be expressly
forbidden entry to the construction camp. This
would also assist in reducing the risk of
coerced or transactional sex and other forms of
child exploitation.
Access to the construction camp and work site
should be carefully monitored. Only
authorized personnel shall be permitted entry
into the construction camp.
Signed undertaking by
Contractor received by
SPIU
Adequate notices placed
in construction camps
and security detailed
around camp.
Camp security put in-
place
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
Gender Issues
Identify and remove any potential gender-bias
within the procurement processes for
construction workers;
Provide training and information on LBES and
maintenance procedures that address gender
issues including a greater focus on gender-
balanced community participation, enabling an
understanding of the gender impact of failing
infrastructure, and of the non-economic
benefits of investment;
Encouraging community contractors to include
women;
Support women’s involvement in economic
opportunities along traditional gender roles
such as provision of food to construction
workers while encouraging women’s
involvement in less traditional roles such as
construction activities.
Requirement for equal work for both men and
women;
Requirement for Contractor (construction) and
to submit records of labour, dis-aggregated by
gender and origin.
Procurement plan
submitted to SPIU and
implemented
Training carried out and
information disseminated
Women included as
community contractors
Women engaged as
providers of traditional
gender roles
Equal work for men and
women given out
Disaggregated labour list
submitted
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
Air Quality and Noise
Levels
The contractor will ensure that all project
machinery comply with international emission
limits. In order to sustain this, all equipment
and machinery to be used for project activities
shall be regularly serviced and maintained;
As much as possible, all open soil surfaces
shall be regularly sprinkled with water to
reduce dust and particulate generation.
Project equipment shall comply with noise
emission limits. This will be achieved by the
use of silenced/muffled engines. In addition,
project workers, especially those who have to
work in close proximity to noise emitting
machinery/equipment shall be provided with
adequate hearing protection devices and
facilities.
International emissions
standards complied with.
All open places sprinkled
with water.
Noise emissions limit
complied with
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
74
TABLE AP2.3: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) FOR CLUSTER #3 ROADS
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure Performance Indicator Responsibility Cost (NGN)
Pre-Construction Stage
Spread of
STIs/HIV/AIDS
Implementation of awareness and prevention
program-contractor
Program implemented
Contractor
&recognized
provider
Direct provider
cost paid by
SPIU/FPMU
Implementation of awareness and prevention
program-community (villages)
Program implemented
Contractor
&recognized
provider
Direct provider
cost paid by
SPIU/FPMU
Social disruption due to
construction workers in
area, including concerns
about security, stealing,
and increase problems
of women
Villages and works site protocols and grievance
redress procedures discussed with communities
and workers; worker awareness campaign as part
of mobilization; prohibition on unauthorized
people entering camp site/ work areas
Workers awareness
program completed
Contractor,
SPIU,
communities
No marginal
cost
Local custom
requirements for access
through land, for
materials or discharge
Access through or to land to obtain materials or
discharge water etc. shall only be done after
consultation with FPMU, the Engineer, and in
accordance the consultation plan
Relevant consultations
completed
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
Run-off from material
stockpile locations
Materials stockpile areas shall be nominated in the
stockpile plan and approved by the Engineer prior
to construction and managed (including slope
angle and run-off diversion ditches) to minimize
run-off to surrounding terrain
Stockpile plan prepared
and approved by
Engineer. No or minimal
observed run-off and no
increased turbidity in
rivers observed from
these sources.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Construction Stage
Borrow Pits and
Quarries
Use existing Enugu State Ministry of Works
(MoWI) and Infrastructure permitted limestone
quarries and borrow pits for road base materials.
Should the use of new or extended quarries be
necessitated, note that these require an EIA, EMP,
and permits in advance in accordance with
Government and FPMU guidelines.
For any proposed new hard rock (basalt) quarries
opened:
The approval of applicable land owners, lessee
(custom owners, province or MoWI ) will be
required before extraction of any material can
occur
A quarry permit is required pursuant to the
mines and minerals (Licences) Regulations.
This will require an EIA and EMP in
accordance with Government and FPMU
Guidelines
In accordance with the contract a Quarry
Management plan is required incorporating
details of quarry opening activities; quarrying
operations, quarry closing and site
rehabilitation.
Existing borrow pits
identified and QMP
submitted and approved
Quarry license obtained
Approval obtained
Quarry Management plan
prepared
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
To be paid by
Contractor
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
75
For all quarry operations (existing or new quarries):
Drains are to be constructed around the uphill
side of the borrow pit to prevent runoff
entering the area and will direct all runoff
away from the borrow pit into stable disposal
areas.
The base of the borrow pit is to be drained at
all times (to prevent build-up of still water that
provide a suitable environment for mosquitoes
to breed). The drains must not directly
discharge to waterways.
Borrow pits are to be situated well away from
groundwater wells and the water table level
managed to prevent contamination of
groundwater resources.
Overburden is to be stockpiled for spreading
in the borrow pit surface when operations are
complete. Runoff is not to pond in the
stockpiled area
The face of the borrow pit is to be stable at all
times
Blasting operations are to be carried out by
certified personnel. Where appropriate and/or
considered aesthetically desirable, areas that
have been quarried will be rehabilitated. A
rehabilitation plan should be developed in
consultation with the Environment Unit and
the local community. Rehabilitation should
include covering of the water table to avoid
future contamination.
Uphill drains
constructed.
Bottom drains operating
and no direct discharge
to water courses.
No nearby wells.
Overburden stockpiled
Borrow pit face stable.
Certified personnel
responsible for blasting.
Rehabilitation completed
in accordance with
Quarry management
plan.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Erosion or
sedimentation caused
during clearing,
earthworks or activities
in streams and rivers
Install sediment fences and/or sediment traps to
collect sediment prior to any site disturbance and
construction works and to be checked after each
rainfall
Sediment traps installed
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
No dumping of spoil on or extraction of material
within 100m of streams, rivers or coastal area
without correct Government permit.
No evidence of spoil
dumping or extraction of
materials at nearby
streams and coastal
areas.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
76
No run-off diversions to be directed to private
property, unless approved by a provincial
representative and the Engineer, and any run-off
management shall be consistent with the site EMIP
Run-off diversions
approved by Engineer
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Side slopes of embankments designed to reflect soil
strength
No slope failures
observed on side slopes
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Gabion baskets or rock rip-rap to be used around
bridge abutments as appropriate
Bridge abutments
protected
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Embankments and stream or river channels to be
monitored for signs of erosion
Site inspection records
indicating monitoring
undertaken.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Stones and rocks kept on hand and used in event of
bank or channel erosion
Stockpiles of rock and
stones around stream
courses.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Minimize size and duration of cleared areas
Minimal vegetation
clearance
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Retain topsoil (in stockpiles no higher than 2m,
away from drainage paths and including run-off
ditches) for use in re-vegetation as required
Topsoil stockpiles
observed.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Undertake progressive re-vegetation of cleared
areas if required
No exposed soil areas
following completion of
works.
Contractor and
Community
Contractors
No marginal
cost
Avoid clearing gravel or spreading activities during
rain or if rain is imminent
No gravel spreading
during heavy rain
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Vehicle traffic to be restricted to designated paths
within the site
Temporary traffic lanes
clearly designated.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Land and soil stability
related to proposed
drainage works
For all drainage works on assessment of impact on
additional water flows on stability of adjacent
slopes must be measured.
No land or soil stability
issues.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Water Quality
Install sediment fences and/or sediment traps to
collect sediment prior disturbance and construction
works and to be checked after each rainfall
No evidence of direct site
run-off into water
courses or resultant
increased turbidity in
these water bodies
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
Use of silt control grass (appropriate for local
ecosystems) to protect water supply from siltation
No evidence of runoff
into water bodies and
rivers/streams.
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
River, stream or creek crossing works should not
be carried out ( or works stopped) during peak
flows to prevent washout of sediment and erosion
control measures, and waste material affected
downstream users.
No evidence of
equipment or waste
material downstream of
site.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Sediment controls measures to be maintained on a
regular basis
Evidence of sediment
controls operating
effectively.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Placement of diversion ditches around stockpiles,
camp (day and overnight)
No evidence of direct
run-off from stockpiles
into water courses
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Rivers and streams to be protected from pollution,
silting, flooding or erosion through the installation
of sediment traps, ponds, silt fences and bunds
No evidence of direct site
run-off into water
courses.
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
Debris, spent fuel or oil, waste materials not to be
dumped near streams or rivers. Spills require
immediate attention including removal of
contaminated material (for disposal in approved
landfill) and remediation of the site to the
satisfaction of the Engineer
No evidence of dumping
site waste materials in
unauthorized areas.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
77
Interference with
existing infrastructure
(telecommunications,
electricity, water)
Site surface water including run-off of groundwater
seepage shall not be discharged directly to any
aquatic environment. If saturation occurs all work
in this locality shall cease and many only resume
on approval of the Engineer.
No evidence of direct site
run-off into water
courses.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Culverts to comply with design specifications
Engineer’s approval of
design specification
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Spoil and material stockpiles not to be located
within 15m of streams or rivers or drinking wells.
No stockpiles observed
within 15m of water
courses
Contractor
No marginal
cost
All waste-water and waste generated by the project
to be collected and disposed of in approved manner
and location
Solid and liquid waste
collection and disposal
system operating on site
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Run-off from potentially polluted surfaces, such as
vehicle and machinery storage areas, site huts,
construction camp etc., must be captured and
treated on site
Sediment and grease
traps installed around
plant maintenance areas.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Consult with relevant authorities (including village
water committees) responsible for utility services to
minimize physical impacts on public infrastructure
and disruption to services
No disruption to public
infrastructure or utilities.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Abandoned service infrastructure (as approved by
the Engineer) shall be cut (ducts, pipes or cables),
removed and stocked piled for later disposal
No evidence of
unauthorized waste
disposal
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Community or individually owned infrastructure
uncovered during construction should be protected
from damage. Consultation with the owner of the
infrastructure to determine whether infrastructure is
being used and should be retained within the new
road is required.
No disruption to
community or privately
owned infrastructure or
utilities.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
In the case of any disruption of utilities for a period
that has the potential to affect income generation or
health (water supply disruption) an appropriate
response (water trucks to deliver water or goodwill
entitlements offered ) must be facilitated by
Contractor.
No complaints related to
disruption of services to
households.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Soil contamination
from spillage of oil or
other chemicals or
substances
Provide protective gear and equipment as well as
education to workers handling hazardous materials
Store oil, fuel and chemicals in secure area/
compound , with concrete floor and weatherproof
roof and surrounded by bunds that will prevent spilt
oil, other chemicals or substances escaping to the
ground,
No evidence of oil and/or
chemical seepage into
ground around fuel and
chemical storage depots.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Develop a hazardous materials spill response/
cleanup plan to implement in the event of a spill
occurring
Spill response clean-up
plan available on site
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Health and Safety
Provision of adequate protection to the
general public in the vicinity of the work
sire, including advance notice of
commencement of works, installing
safety barriers if required by villagers,
and signage or marking of the work
areas;
Provision of safe access across the works
site to people whose villages and access
are temporarily affected during road
rehabilitation activities;
Adequate protection
provided
Safe access across the
works site provided
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
78
Use of signs and other appropriate safety
features to indicate construction works
are being undertake;
Adequate signage and security provided
at the work camp site and prevention of
unauthorized people (including children)
entering the work camp site or workshop
area;
The contractor will provide adequate
health care facilities including a health
post and access to first aid facilities if
construction camps are set up. The
contractor will provide construction
workers personal protection equipment
and training of all in basic sanitation,
hygiene and health care issues, health and
safety matters, and on the specific
hazards of their work;
The contractor will ensure that no
wastewater is discharge to local water
bodies;
The contractor will ensure safe and clean
facilities including sanitation and
drinking water is provided to all workers;
The contractor will ensure any borrow
pits used for coronus and other materials
extraction are properly restored to ensure
groundwater resources are not
contaminated;
No site-specific landfills will be
established at the construction camps;
Septic tanks and garbage receptacles will
be set up at construction camp site
camps, which will be regularly cleared by
the contractors to prevent outbreak of
diseases. Waste will be disposed of at
sites approved by the Environment Unit,
LGAs and local land owners.
Signs and safety
measures installed
Signage and security
provide for safety of
people.
Health post in-place and
functional.
Plan on wastewater
discharge submitted to
SPIU
Clean working
environment in-place
Borrow pit installed
Septic Tanks and
receptacles in0place
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
Traffic and Access
Issues
Signs and other appropriate safety
features will be used to indicate
construction works and being undertaken;
Preparation (by the contractor) of a traffic
management plan addressing access
issues during construction activities (as
required by the tender document);
Provision of safe access across the works
site to people whose villages and access
are temporarily affected during road
rehabilitation activities; and
Consideration of a reduced design
standard through villages, and/or
Signs and safety
measures installed
Traffic management plan
submitted to SPIU
Safe access facility
installed
Reduced design standard
submitted to SPIU
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
79
inclusion of signage and physical
measures (such as speed humps and
chicanes) to reduce traffic speed in the
vicinity of villages.
Social Impacts-Stress
on Resources &
Infrastructure
If two construction camps (site office and
overnight accommodation) are required the
contractor will provide temporary facilities such
as health care, eating and sleeping areas (
including a cook and provision of meals), water
and electricity supply, telecommunications, so
that existing facilities and services of adjacent
villages are not over-burdened.
The contractor will be responsible for removing
all temporary structures and reinstating the land
to its pre-project condition at the completion of
the works for both day camps and, if necessary,
the construction camps.
Construction workers should be limited to
project sites (immediate site of works on the
road and camp site).
Workers should be briefed on land owner and
property boundaries and village protocol, rules
and terms of conduct (especially when
addressing women and elders).
Contract employment rules will be enforced
relating to any damage of productive trees and
gardens, and access to the beach, foreshore and
freshwater springs.
SPIU to brief the contractor on the provisions
of the consultation plan to allow the
development of a communications plan for
outlining protocol between the project team and
community, in particular the contractors
Stakeholder Liaison Manager, village chief and
elders, as well as communication between the
contractor and project. The contractor will be responsible for the
behaviour of construction workers outside
working hours for those construction workers
accommodated outside the site area. In the
event that there are complaints that will be dealt
with immediately and seriously, by the
contractor, and the method of addressing the
grievance will be relayed to the complainant. If
the complainant is not satisfied that the
complaint has been resolved, the worker
causing the complaint should be restricted to
working on another site. The lodgement and
resolution of complaints will be recorded and
monitored.
Children and teenagers should be expressly
forbidden entry to the construction camp. This
would also assist in reducing the risk of coerced
or transactional sex and other forms of child
exploitation.
Access to the construction camp and work site
should be carefully monitored. Only authorized
personnel shall be permitted entry into the
construction camp.
Temporary facilities
provided
Removal of temporary
structures and restoring
the land to it pre-project
conditions carried out
Enforcement of
restriction on site
Workers adequately
sensitised
Contract employment
rules enforced
Consultation plan
communicated to
Contractor
Signed undertaking by
Contractor received by
SPIU
Adequate notices placed
in construction camps
and security detailed
around camp.
Camp security put in-
place
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
SPIU
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
80
Gender Issues
Identify and remove any potential gender-bias
within the procurement processes for
construction workers;
Provide training and information on LBES and
maintenance procedures that address gender
issues including a greater focus on gender-
balanced community participation, enabling an
understanding of the gender impact of failing
infrastructure, and of the non-economic
benefits of investment;
Encouraging community contractors to include
women;
Support women’s involvement in economic
opportunities along traditional gender roles
such as provision of food to construction
workers while encouraging women’s
involvement in less traditional roles such as
construction activities.
Requirement for equal work for both men and
women;
Requirement for Contractor (construction) and
to submit records of labour, dis-aggregated by
gender and origin.
Procurement plan
submitted to SPIU and
implemented
Training carried out and
information disseminated
Women included as
community contractors
Women engaged as
providers of traditional
gender roles
Equal work for men and
women given out
Disaggregated labour list
submitted
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
Air Quality and Noise
Levels
The contractor will ensure that all project
machinery comply with international emission
limits. In order to sustain this, all equipment
and machinery to be used for project activities
shall be regularly serviced and maintained;
As much as possible, all open soil surfaces
shall be regularly sprinkled with water to
reduce dust and particulate generation.
Project equipment shall comply with noise
emission limits. This will be achieved by the
use of silenced/muffled engines. In addition,
project workers, especially those who have to
work in close proximity to noise emitting
machinery/equipment shall be provided with
adequate hearing protection devices and
facilities.
International emissions
standards complied with.
All open places sprinkled
with water.
Noise emissions limit
complied with
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
81
TABLE AP2.4: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) FOR CLUSTER #4 ROADS
Potential Impact Mitigation Measure Performance Indicator Responsibility Cost (NGN)
Pre-Construction Stage
Spread of
STIs/HIV/AIDS
Implementation of awareness and prevention
program-contractor
Program implemented
Contractor
&recognized
provider
Direct provider
cost paid by
SPIU/FPMU
Implementation of awareness and prevention
program-community (villages)
Program implemented
Contractor
&recognized
provider
Direct provider
cost paid by
SPIU/FPMU
Social disruption due to
construction workers in
area, including concerns
about security, stealing,
and increase problems
of women
Villages and works site protocols and grievance
redress procedures discussed with communities
and workers; worker awareness campaign as part
of mobilization; prohibition on unauthorized
people entering camp site/ work areas
Workers awareness
program completed
Contractor,
SPIU,
communities
No marginal
cost
Land acquisition,
resettlement, tree, crop
and structure clearance
A number of potential losses and relocations have
been identified and will be addressed through an
ARAP.
ARAP implemented
FPMU,
Contractor,
SPIU with other
relevant govt
agencies
Refer ARAP
Local custom
requirements for access
through land, for
materials or discharge
Access through or to land to obtain materials or
discharge water etc. shall only be done after
consultation with FPMU, the Engineer, and in
accordance with the ARAP and the consultation
plan
Relevant consultations
completed
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
Run-off from material
stockpile locations
Materials stockpile areas shall be nominated in the
stockpile plan and approved by the Engineer prior
to construction and managed (including slope
angle and run-off diversion ditches) to minimize
run-off to surrounding terrain
Stockpile plan prepared
and approved by
Engineer. No or minimal
observed run-off and no
increased turbidity in
rivers observed from
these sources.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Construction Stage
Borrow Pits and
Quarries
Use existing Enugu State Ministry of Works
(MoWI) and Infrastructure permitted limestone
quarries and borrow pits for road base materials.
Should the use of new or extended quarries be
necessitated, note that these require an EIA, EMP,
and permits in advance in accordance with
Government and FPMU guidelines.
For any proposed new hard rock (basalt) quarries
opened:
The approval of applicable land owners, lessee
(custom owners, province or MoWI ) will be
required before extraction of any material can
occur
A quarry permit is required pursuant to the
mines and minerals (Licences) Regulations.
This will require an EIA and EMP in
accordance with Government and FPMU
Guidelines
In accordance with the contract a Quarry
Management plan is required incorporating
details of quarry opening activities; quarrying
operations, quarry closing and site
rehabilitation.
Existing borrow pits
identified and QMP
submitted and approved
Quarry license obtained
Approval obtained
Quarry Management plan
prepared
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
To be paid by
Contractor
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
82
For all quarry operations (existing or new quarries):
Drains are to be constructed around the uphill
side of the borrow pit to prevent runoff
entering the area and will direct all runoff
away from the borrow pit into stable disposal
areas.
The base of the borrow pit is to be drained at
all times (to prevent build-up of still water that
provide a suitable environment for mosquitoes
to breed). The drains must not directly
discharge to waterways.
Borrow pits are to be situated well away from
groundwater wells and the water table level
managed to prevent contamination of
groundwater resources.
Overburden is to be stockpiled for spreading
in the borrow pit surface when operations are
complete. Runoff is not to pond in the
stockpiled area
The face of the borrow pit is to be stable at all
times
Blasting operations are to be carried out by
certified personnel. Where appropriate and/or
considered aesthetically desirable, areas that
have been quarried will be rehabilitated. A
rehabilitation plan should be developed in
consultation with the Environment Unit and
the local community. Rehabilitation should
include covering of the water table to avoid
future contamination.
Uphill drains
constructed.
Bottom drains operating
and no direct discharge
to water courses.
No nearby wells.
Overburden stockpiled
Borrow pit face stable.
Certified personnel
responsible for blasting.
Rehabilitation completed
in accordance with
Quarry management
plan.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Erosion or
sedimentation caused
during clearing,
earthworks or activities
in streams and rivers
Install sediment fences and/or sediment traps to
collect sediment prior to any site disturbance and
construction works and to be checked after each
rainfall
Sediment traps installed
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
No dumping of spoil on or extraction of material
within 100m of streams, rivers or coastal area
without correct Government permit.
No evidence of spoil
dumping or extraction of
materials at nearby
streams and coastal
areas.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No run-off diversions to be directed to private
property, unless approved by a provincial
representative and the Engineer, and any run-off
management shall be consistent with the site EMIP
Run-off diversions
approved by Engineer
Contractor
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
83
Side slopes of embankments designed to reflect soil
strength
No slope failures
observed on side slopes
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Gabion baskets or rock rip-rap to be used around
bridge abutments as appropriate
Bridge abutments
protected
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Embankments and stream or river channels to be
monitored for signs of erosion
Site inspection records
indicating monitoring
undertaken.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Stones and rocks kept on hand and used in event of
bank or channel erosion
Stockpiles of rock and
stones around stream
courses.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Minimize size and duration of cleared areas
Minimal vegetation
clearance
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Retain topsoil (in stockpiles no higher than 2m,
away from drainage paths and including run-off
ditches) for use in re-vegetation as required
Topsoil stockpiles
observed.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Undertake progressive re-vegetation of cleared
areas if required
No exposed soil areas
following completion of
works.
Contractor and
Community
Contractors
No marginal
cost
Avoid clearing gravel or spreading activities during
rain or if rain is imminent
No gravel spreading
during heavy rain
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Vehicle traffic to be restricted to designated paths
within the site
Temporary traffic lanes
clearly designated.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Land and soil stability
related to proposed
drainage works
For all drainage works on assessment of impact on
additional water flows on stability of adjacent
slopes must be measured.
No land or soil stability
issues.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Water Quality
Install sediment fences and/or sediment traps to
collect sediment prior disturbance and construction
works and to be checked after each rainfall
No evidence of direct site
run-off into water
courses or resultant
increased turbidity in
these water bodies
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
Use of silt control grass (appropriate for local
ecosystems) to protect water supply from siltation
No evidence of runoff
into water bodies and
rivers/streams.
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
River, stream or creek crossing works should not
be carried out ( or works stopped) during peak
flows to prevent washout of sediment and erosion
control measures, and waste material affected
downstream users.
No evidence of
equipment or waste
material downstream of
site.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Sediment controls measures to be maintained on a
regular basis
Evidence of sediment
controls operating
effectively.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Placement of diversion ditches around stockpiles,
camp (day and overnight)
No evidence of direct
run-off from stockpiles
into water courses
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Rivers and streams to be protected from pollution,
silting, flooding or erosion through the installation
of sediment traps, ponds, silt fences and bunds
No evidence of direct site
run-off into water
courses.
Contractor
To be paid by
Contractor
Debris, spent fuel or oil, waste materials not to be
dumped near streams or rivers. Spills require
immediate attention including removal of
contaminated material (for disposal in approved
landfill) and remediation of the site to the
satisfaction of the Engineer
No evidence of dumping
site waste materials in
unauthorized areas.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Site surface water including run-off of groundwater
seepage shall not be discharged directly to any
aquatic environment. If saturation occurs all work
in this locality shall cease and many only resume
on approval of the Engineer.
No evidence of direct site
run-off into water
courses.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Culverts to comply with design specifications
Engineer’s approval of
design specification
Contractor
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
84
Interference with
existing infrastructure
(telecommunications,
electricity, water)
Spoil and material stockpiles not to be located
within 15m of streams or rivers or drinking wells.
No stockpiles observed
within 15m of water
courses
Contractor
No marginal
cost
All waste-water and waste generated by the project
to be collected and disposed of in approved manner
and location
Solid and liquid waste
collection and disposal
system operating on site
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Run-off from potentially polluted surfaces, such as
vehicle and machinery storage areas, site huts,
construction camp etc., must be captured and
treated on site
Sediment and grease
traps installed around
plant maintenance areas.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Consult with relevant authorities (including village
water committees) responsible for utility services to
minimize physical impacts on public infrastructure
and disruption to services
No disruption to public
infrastructure or utilities.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Abandoned service infrastructure (as approved by
the Engineer) shall be cut (ducts, pipes or cables),
removed and stocked piled for later disposal
No evidence of
unauthorized waste
disposal
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Community or individually owned infrastructure
uncovered during construction should be protected
from damage. Consultation with the owner of the
infrastructure to determine whether infrastructure is
being used and should be retained within the new
road is required.
No disruption to
community or privately
owned infrastructure or
utilities.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
In the case of any disruption of utilities for a period
that has the potential to affect income generation or
health (water supply disruption) an appropriate
response (water trucks to deliver water or goodwill
entitlements offered ) must be facilitated by
Contractor.
No complaints related to
disruption of services to
households.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Soil contamination
from spillage of oil or
other chemicals or
substances
Provide protective gear and equipment as well as
education to workers handling hazardous materials
Store oil, fuel and chemicals in secure area/
compound , with concrete floor and weatherproof
roof and surrounded by bunds that will prevent spilt
oil, other chemicals or substances escaping to the
ground,
No evidence of oil and/or
chemical seepage into
ground around fuel and
chemical storage depots.
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Develop a hazardous materials spill response/
cleanup plan to implement in the event of a spill
occurring
Spill response clean-up
plan available on site
Contractor
No marginal
cost
Health and Safety
Provision of adequate protection to the
general public in the vicinity of the work
sire, including advance notice of
commencement of works, installing
safety barriers if required by villagers,
and signage or marking of the work
areas;
Provision of safe access across the works
site to people whose villages and access
are temporarily affected during road
rehabilitation activities;
Use of signs and other appropriate safety
features to indicate construction works
are being undertake;
Adequate signage and security provided
at the work camp site and prevention of
unauthorized people (including children)
Adequate protection
provided
Safe access across the
works site provided
Signs and safety
measures installed
Signage and security
provide for safety of
people.
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
85
entering the work camp site or workshop
area;
The contractor will provide adequate
health care facilities including a health
post and access to first aid facilities if
construction camps are set up. The
contractor will provide construction
workers personal protection equipment
and training of all in basic sanitation,
hygiene and health care issues, health and
safety matters, and on the specific
hazards of their work;
The contractor will ensure that no
wastewater is discharge to local water
bodies;
The contractor will ensure safe and clean
facilities including sanitation and
drinking water is provided to all workers;
The contractor will ensure any borrow
pits used for coronus and other materials
extraction are properly restored to ensure
groundwater resources are not
contaminated;
No site-specific landfills will be
established at the construction camps;
Septic tanks and garbage receptacles will
be set up at construction camp site
camps, which will be regularly cleared by
the contractors to prevent outbreak of
diseases. Waste will be disposed of at
sites approved by the Environment Unit,
LGAs and local land owners.
Health post in-place and
functional.
Plan on wastewater
discharge submitted to
SPIU
Clean working
environment in-place
Borrow pit installed
Septic Tanks and
receptacles in0place
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
Traffic and Access
Issues
Signs and other appropriate safety
features will be used to indicate
construction works and being undertaken;
Preparation (by the contractor) of a traffic
management plan addressing access
issues during construction activities (as
required by the tender document);
Provision of safe access across the works
site to people whose villages and access
are temporarily affected during road
rehabilitation activities; and
Consideration of a reduced design
standard through villages, and/or
inclusion of signage and physical
measures (such as speed humps and
chicanes) to reduce traffic speed in the
vicinity of villages.
Signs and safety
measures installed
Traffic management plan
submitted to SPIU
Safe access facility
installed
Reduced design standard
submitted to SPIU
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
Social Impacts-Stress
If two construction camps (site office and
Temporary facilities
Contractor
No marginal
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
86
on Resources &
Infrastructure
overnight accommodation) are required
the contractor will provide temporary
facilities such as health care, eating and
sleeping areas ( including a cook and
provision of meals), water and electricity
supply, telecommunications, so that
existing facilities and services of adjacent
villages are not over-burdened.
The contractor will be responsible for
removing all temporary structures and
reinstating the land to its pre-project
condition at the completion of the works
for both day camps and, if necessary, the
construction camps.
Construction workers should be limited
to project sites (immediate site of works
on the road and camp site).
Workers should be briefed on land owner
and property boundaries and village
protocol, rules and terms of conduct
(especially when addressing women and
elders).
Contract employment rules will be
enforced relating to any damage of
productive trees and gardens, and access
to the beach, foreshore and freshwater
springs.
SPIU to brief the contractor on the
provisions of the consultation plan to
allow the development of a
communications plan for outlining
protocol between the project team and
community, in particular the contractors
Stakeholder Liaison Manager, village
chief and elders, as well as
communication between the contractor
and project.
The contractor will be responsible for the
behaviour of construction workers
outside working hours for those
construction workers accommodated
outside the site area. In the event that
there are complaints that will be dealt
with immediately and seriously, by the
contractor, and the method of addressing
the grievance will be relayed to the
complainant. If the complainant is not
satisfied that the complaint has been
resolved, the worker causing the
complaint should be restricted to working
on another site. The lodgement and
resolution of complaints will be recorded
and monitored.
provided
Removal of temporary
structures and restoring
the land to it pre-project
conditions carried out
Enforcement of
restriction on site
Workers adequately
sensitised
Contract employment
rules enforced
Consultation plan
communicated to
Contractor
Signed undertaking by
Contractor received by
SPIU
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
SPIU
Contractor
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
87
Children and teenagers should be
expressly forbidden entry to the
construction camp. This would also assist
in reducing the risk of coerced or
transactional sex and other forms of child
exploitation.
Access to the construction camp and
work site should be carefully monitored.
Only authorized personnel shall be
permitted entry into the construction
camp.
Adequate notices placed
in construction camps
and security detailed
around camp.
Camp security put in-
place
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
Gender Issues
Identify and remove any potential
gender-bias within the procurement
processes for construction workers;
Provide training and information on
LBES and maintenance procedures that
address gender issues including a greater
focus on gender-balanced community
participation, enabling an understanding
of the gender impact of failing
infrastructure, and of the non-economic
benefits of investment;
Encouraging community contractors to
include women;
Support women’s involvement in
economic opportunities along traditional
gender roles such as provision of food to
construction workers while encouraging
women’s involvement in less traditional
roles such as construction activities.
Requirement for equal work for both
men and women;
Requirement for Contractor
(construction) and to submit records of
labour, dis-aggregated by gender and
origin.
Procurement plan
submitted to SPIU and
implemented
Training carried out and
information disseminated
Women included as
community contractors
Women engaged as
providers of traditional
gender roles
Equal work for men and
women given out
Disaggregated labour list
submitted
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
Air Quality and Noise
Levels
The contractor will ensure that all project
machinery comply with international emission
limits. In order to sustain this, all equipment
and machinery to be used for project activities
shall be regularly serviced and maintained;
As much as possible, all open soil surfaces
shall be regularly sprinkled with water to
reduce dust and particulate generation.
Project equipment shall comply with noise
emission limits. This will be achieved by the
use of silenced/muffled engines. In addition,
project workers, especially those who have to
work in close proximity to noise emitting
machinery/equipment shall be provided with
adequate hearing protection devices and
facilities.
International emissions
standards complied with.
All open places sprinkled
with water.
Noise emissions limit
complied with
Contractor
Contractor
Contractor
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
No marginal
cost
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
88
APPENDIX C:
Table AP3.1: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN (EMoP)FOR CLUSTER #1 ROADS
Parameter
Location
Monitoring (Visual Inspection)
Frequency of
Inspection
Responsibility
Pre- Construction Phase
STI/HIV/AIDS
Prevalence
Camp
Check contractor records, consultation with
employees, discussions with NGO
Prior to
construction
Supervising
Consultant
Villages and
Camp
Discussion with NGO, Consultation with
villages
Prior to
construction
Supervising
Consultant
Village and site
Protocols
Villages and
Camp
Check custom welcome and meeting to
explain village protocols and site access
and safety rules.
Prior to
construction
Supervising
Consultant
Construction Phase
Borrow Pits/ Quarries
Borrow Pits/
Quarries sites
Visual inspection to ensure requirements of
EMP and Quarry Management Plans are
properly implemented.
Daily by
contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Spoil areas
Read Corridor
Visual inspection (i) ensure vegetation
clearance minimized; (ii) no garden or
agricultural land used; (iii) no dump sites
near rivers and streams
Monthly by
Contractor
Monthly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Erosion
Coastal areas
adjacent to road
corridor
Visual inspection of culverts, bridges and
coastal areas for any occurrence of erosion
Daily by
contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Hydrocarbon and
chemical storage
Construction
camp/workshop
area
Visual inspection of storage facilities as per
EMP and emergency response plan. Ensure
storage sites are using concrete base with a
containment bunds
Weekly by
Contractor
Monthly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Hazardous Materials
Construction
Camp
Visual inspection of work methods and
practices to ensure that workers have
protective gear and equipment and training
in the use of hazardous materials.
Daily by
Contractor
Monthly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Waste Management
Construction
Camps
Visual inspection that solid waste is
disposed as per EMP
Daily by
contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Surface water quality
Streams and rivers
Visual inspection, consultation with users
Daily by
Contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Nearby water
courses
Visual inspection that sediment traps,
ponds, silt fences and bunds are in place
and operating effectively.
Daily by
Contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Water Section of
the Water Utility
Directly down
streams of
pollution event
Visual inspection,
consultation with users
After pollution
event by
contractor and
SPIU
Water Section of
the Water Utility
Air quality
Emissions, dust,
particulate matter
Visual inspection
Daily by
Contractor
After complaint
by SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Noise
Sensitive areas
Consultation (ensure schedule being
adhered to)
Daily by
Contractor
After complaint
by SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
89
Re-vegetation
Road corridor
Monitoring of progress of re-vegetation
activities per EMP
Monthly by
Contractor and
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Parameter
Location
Monitoring (Visual Inspection)
Frequency of
Inspection
Responsibility
Social impact
Villages along the
project road
Consultation and visual observations-
complaints viz-a-viz workers; village rules
being adhered to; access to camp
prohibited to other than authorised staff
Monthly by
Contractor and
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Community
Road corridor
Consult with villages along project road to
monitor environmental concerns
Ongoing by
Contractor and
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Labour, LBES, and
Gender Policies
Road corridor
Check contractors records and observe
break-down of local and imported labour
and gender breakdown
Ongoing by
Contractor and
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant and
SPIU
Operation Phase
Noise
Sensitive areas
(villages, schools,
health post)
Villages (as per EMP)
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
Erosion
Subproject
corridor incl.
erosion
Visual assessment of erosion protection
resulting from project
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
Water Quality
Road corridor,
streams and rivers
Visual assessment of increased suspended
solids from road or areas of erosion, if
identified
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
Road Safety
Road corridor
Collect road accident data; Safety issues
discussed in schools
Community crossing and safety
committees operating
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
Re-vegetation
Road corridor
Ongoing monitoring of re-vegetation as per
EMP
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
90
Table AP3.2: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN (EMoP) FOR CLUSTER #2 ROADS
Parameter
Location
Monitoring (Visual Inspection)
Frequency of
Inspection
Responsibility
Pre- Construction Phase
STI/HIV/AIDS
Prevalence
Camp
Check contractor records, consultation with
employees, discussions with NGO
Prior to
construction
Supervising
Consultant
Villages and
Camp
Discussion with NGO, Consultation with
villages
Prior to
construction
Supervising
Consultant
Village and site
Protocols
Villages and
Camp
Check custom welcome and meeting to
explain village protocols and site access
and safety rules.
Prior to
construction
Supervising
Consultant
Construction Phase
Borrow Pits/ Quarries
Borrow Pits/
Quarries sites
Visual inspection to ensure requirements of
EMP and Quarry Management Plans are
properly implemented.
Daily by
contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Spoil areas
Read Corridor
Visual inspection (i) ensure vegetation
clearance minimized; (ii) no garden or
agricultural land used; (iii) no dump sites
near rivers and streams
Monthly by
Contractor
Monthly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Erosion
Coastal areas
adjacent to road
corridor
Visual inspection of culverts, bridges and
coastal areas for any occurrence of erosion
Daily by
contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Hydrocarbon and
chemical storage
Construction
camp/workshop
area
Visual inspection of storage facilities as per
EMP and emergency response plan. Ensure
storage sites are using concrete base with a
containment bunds
Weekly by
Contractor
Monthly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Hazardous Materials
Construction
Camp
Visual inspection of work methods and
practices to ensure that workers have
protective gear and equipment and training
in the use of hazardous materials.
Daily by
Contractor
Monthly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Waste Management
Construction
Camps
Visual inspection that solid waste is
disposed as per EMP
Daily by
contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Contractor ;
Supervising
Consultant
Surface water quality
Streams and rivers
Visual inspection, consultation with users
Daily by
Contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Contractor ;
Supervising
Consultant
Nearby water
courses
Visual inspection that sediment traps,
ponds, silt fences and bunds are in place
and operating effectively.
Daily by
Contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Water Section of
the Water Utility
Directly down
streams of
pollution event
Visual inspection,
consultation with users
After pollution
event by
contractor and
SPIU
Water Section of
the Water Utility
Air quality
Emissions, dust,
particulate matter
Visual inspection
Daily by
Contractor
After complaint
by SPIU
Contractor ;
Supervising
Consultant
Noise
Sensitive areas
Consultation (ensure schedule being
adhered to)
Daily by
Contractor
After complaint
by SPIU
Contractor ;
Supervising
Consultant
Re-vegetation
Road corridor
Monitoring of progress of re-vegetation
activities per EMP
Monthly by
Contractor and
SPIU
Contractor ;
Supervising
Consultant
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
91
Parameter
Location
Monitoring (Visual Inspection)
Frequency of
Inspection
Responsibility
Social impact
Villages along the
project road
Consultation and visual observations-
complaints viz-a-viz workers; village rules
being adhered to; access to camp
prohibited to other than authorised staff
Monthly by
Contractor and
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Community
Road corridor
Consult with villages along project road to
monitor environmental concerns
Ongoing by
Contractor and
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Labour, LBES, and
Gender Policies
Road corridor
Check contractors records and observe
break-down of local and imported labour
and gender breakdown
Ongoing by
Contractor and
SPIU
Contractor,
Supervising
Consultant and
SPIU
Operation Phase
Noise
Sensitive areas
(villages, schools,
health post)
Villages (as per EMP)
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
Erosion
Subproject
corridor incl.
erosion
Visual assessment of erosion protection
resulting from project
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
Water Quality
Road corridor,
streams and rivers
Visual assessment of increased suspended
solids from road or areas of erosion, if
identified
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
Road Safety
Road corridor
Collect road accident data; Safety issues
discussed in schools
Community crossing and safety
committees operating
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
Re-vegetation
Road corridor
Ongoing monitoring of re-vegetation as per
EMP
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
92
Table AP3.3: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN (EMoP) FOR CLUSTER #3 ROADS
Parameter
Location
Monitoring (Visual Inspection)
Frequency of
Inspection
Responsibility
Pre- Construction Phase
STI/HIV/AIDS
Prevalence
Camp
Check contractor records, consultation with
employees, discussions with NGO
Prior to
construction
Supervising
Consultant
Villages and
Camp
Discussion with NGO, Consultation with
villages
Prior to
construction
Supervising
Consultant
Village and site
Protocols
Villages and
Camp
Check custom welcome and meeting to
explain village protocols and site access
and safety rules.
Prior to
construction
Supervising
Consultant
Construction Phase
Borrow Pits/ Quarries
Borrow Pits/
Quarries sites
Visual inspection to ensure requirements of
EMP and Quarry Management Plans are
properly implemented.
Daily by
contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Spoil areas
Read Corridor
Visual inspection (i) ensure vegetation
clearance minimized; (ii) no garden or
agricultural land used; (iii) no dump sites
near rivers and streams
Monthly by
Contractor
Monthly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Erosion
Coastal areas
adjacent to road
corridor
Visual inspection of culverts, bridges and
coastal areas for any occurrence of erosion
Daily by
contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Hydrocarbon and
chemical storage
Construction
camp/workshop
area
Visual inspection of storage facilities as per
EMP and emergency response plan. Ensure
storage sites are using concrete base with a
containment bunds
Weekly by
Contractor
Monthly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Hazardous Materials
Construction
Camp
Visual inspection of work methods and
practices to ensure that workers have
protective gear and equipment and training
in the use of hazardous materials.
Daily by
Contractor
Monthly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Waste Management
Construction
Camps
Visual inspection that solid waste is
disposed as per EMP
Daily by
contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Contractor ;
Supervising
Consultant
Surface water quality
Streams and rivers
Visual inspection, consultation with users
Daily by
Contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Contractor ;
Supervising
Consultant
Nearby water
courses
Visual inspection that sediment traps,
ponds, silt fences and bunds are in place
and operating effectively.
Daily by
Contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Water Section of
the Water Utility
Directly down
streams of
pollution event
Visual inspection,
consultation with users
After pollution
event by
contractor and
SPIU
Water Section of
the Water Utility
Air quality
Emissions, dust,
particulate matter
Visual inspection
Daily by
Contractor
After complaint
by SPIU
Contractor ;
Supervising
Consultant
Noise
Sensitive areas
Consultation (ensure schedule being
adhered to)
Daily by
Contractor
After complaint
by SPIU
Contractor ;
Supervising
Consultant
Re-vegetation
Road corridor
Monitoring of progress of re-vegetation
activities per EMP
Monthly by
Contractor and
SPIU
Contractor ;
Supervising
Consultant
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
93
Parameter
Location
Monitoring (Visual Inspection)
Frequency of
Inspection
Responsibility
Social impact
Villages along the
project road
Consultation and visual observations-
complaints viz-a-viz workers; village rules
being adhered to; access to camp
prohibited to other than authorised staff
Monthly by
Contractor and
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Community
Road corridor
Consult with villages along project road to
monitor environmental concerns
Ongoing by
Contractor and
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Labour, LBES, and
Gender Policies
Road corridor
Check contractors records and observe
break-down of local and imported labour
and gender breakdown
Ongoing by
Contractor and
SPIU
Contractor,
Supervising
Consultant and
FPMU
Operation Phase
Noise
Sensitive areas
(villages, schools,
health post)
Villages (as per EMP)
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
Erosion
Subproject
corridor incl.
erosion
Visual assessment of erosion protection
resulting from project
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
Water Quality
Road corridor,
streams and rivers
Visual assessment of increased suspended
solids from road or areas of erosion, if
identified
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
Road Safety
Road corridor
Collect road accident data; Safety issues
discussed in schools
Community crossing and safety
committees operating
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
Re-vegetation
Road corridor
Ongoing monitoring of re-vegetation as per
EMP
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
94
Table AP3.4: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN (EMoP) FOR CLUSTER #4 ROADS
Parameter
Location
Monitoring (Visual Inspection)
Frequency of
Inspection
Responsibility
Pre- Construction Phase
STI/HIV/AIDS
Prevalence
Camp
Check contractor records, consultation with
employees, discussions with NGO
Prior to
construction
Supervising
Consultant
Villages and
Camp
Discussion with NGO, Consultation with
villages
Prior to
construction
Supervising
Consultant
Village and site
Protocols
Villages and
Camp
Check custom welcome and meeting to
explain village protocols and site access
and safety rules.
Prior to
construction
Supervising
Consultant
Construction Phase
Borrow Pits/ Quarries
Borrow Pits/
Quarries sites
Visual inspection to ensure requirements of
EMP and Quarry Management Plans are
properly implemented.
Daily by
contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Spoil areas
Read Corridor
Visual inspection (i) ensure vegetation
clearance minimized; (ii) no garden or
agricultural land used; (iii) no dump sites
near rivers and streams
Monthly by
Contractor
Monthly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Erosion
Coastal areas
adjacent to road
corridor
Visual inspection of culverts, bridges and
coastal areas for any occurrence of erosion
Daily by
contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Hydrocarbon and
chemical storage
Construction
camp/workshop
area
Visual inspection of storage facilities as per
EMP and emergency response plan. Ensure
storage sites are using concrete base with a
containment bunds
Weekly by
Contractor
Monthly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Hazardous Materials
Construction
Camp
Visual inspection of work methods and
practices to ensure that workers have
protective gear and equipment and training
in the use of hazardous materials.
Daily by
Contractor
Monthly by
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Waste Management
Construction
Camps
Visual inspection that solid waste is
disposed as per EMP
Daily by
contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Contractor ;
Supervising
Consultant
Surface water quality
Streams and rivers
Visual inspection, consultation with users
Daily by
Contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Contractor ;
Supervising
Consultant
Nearby water
courses
Visual inspection that sediment traps,
ponds, silt fences and bunds are in place
and operating effectively.
Daily by
Contractor
Weekly by
SPIU
Water Section of
the Water Utility
Directly down
streams of
pollution event
Visual inspection,
consultation with users
After pollution
event by
contractor and
SPIU
Water Section of
the Water Utility
Air quality
Emissions, dust,
particulate matter
Visual inspection
Daily by
Contractor
After complaint
by SPIU
Contractor ;
Supervising
Consultant
Noise
Sensitive areas
Consultation (ensure schedule being
adhered to)
Daily by
Contractor
After complaint
by SPIU
Contractor ;
Supervising
Consultant
Re-vegetation
Road corridor
Monitoring of progress of re-vegetation
activities per EMP
Monthly by
Contractor and
SPIU
Contractor ;
Supervising
Consultant
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
95
Parameter
Location
Monitoring (Visual Inspection)
Frequency of
Inspection
Responsibility
Social impact
Villages along the
project road
Consultation and visual observations-
complaints viz-a-viz workers; village rules
being adhered to; access to camp
prohibited to other than authorised staff
Monthly by
Contractor and
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Community
Road corridor
Consult with villages along project road to
monitor environmental concerns
Ongoing by
Contractor and
SPIU
Contractor;
Supervising
Consultant
Labour, LBES, and
Gender Policies
Road corridor
Check contractors records and observe
break-down of local and imported labour
and gender breakdown
Ongoing by
Contractor and
SPIU
Contractor,
Supervising
Consultant and
SPIU
Operation Phase
Noise
Sensitive areas
(villages, schools,
health post)
Villages (as per EMP)
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
Erosion
Subproject
corridor incl.
erosion
Visual assessment of erosion protection
resulting from project
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
Water Quality
Road corridor,
streams and rivers
Visual assessment of increased suspended
solids from road or areas of erosion, if
identified
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
Road Safety
Road corridor
Collect road accident data; Safety issues
discussed in schools
Community crossing and safety
committees operating
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
Re-vegetation
Road corridor
Ongoing monitoring of re-vegetation as per
EMP
Twice/year for
3 years, mid-
term and post –
evaluation
monitoring
SPIU
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
96
Appendix D: PICTURES and MINUTES OF MEETINGS
Pix D-1: Stakeholders at Umuaniagu
Pix D-2: Women Group at Umuaniagu
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
97
Pix D-3: Stakeholders at Ojor
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
98
Appendix D-2:MINUTES OF THE CONSULTATION AND NOTIFICATION MEETING
ON THE PROPOSED UNTH-ENUGUAGU NDIAGU-UMUANIAGU-OBE AMURI ROAD (11.88kM)
HELD IN UMUANIAGU (OZALLA) ON THE 29TH MAY, 2012 AT 10.00AM
1.0 ATTENDANCE
i. Chairman, Mr. Joseph Nwogbodo (Community Head)
ii. Engr. Fidelis Nweke, SPIU State Coordinator, Enugu State
iii. Dr. Shakirudeen Odunuga, Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
iv. Engr . Bidemi Bello, Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
v. Engr. S. Igwuodo, SPIU, Enugu State
vi. Engr. Nsiegbunam, SPIU State, Enugu State
vii. 51 Female Participants
viii. 49 Male Participants
2.0 OPENING
The meeting commenced at about 10.00am with Engr F. Nweke introducing members
of the team present. Mr. Joseph Nwogbodo, who is a community/family head and
Chairman of the meeting led the PAPs in introducing themselves one after the other.
3.0 MEETING OBJECTIVES
Project Description: The intentions of FPMU/RAMP and the objectives of RAMP to
upgrade the rural road network in Enugu State and particularly the
construction of the 11.88kM long UNTH-Enuguagu Ndiagu-
Umuaniagu-Obe- Amuri Road on the side of which their
community lies was explained by Engr. Fidelis Nweke. He made the
participants to understand the need for their participation in the
realization of the objectives of the project and continued
consultation towards the success of the project. He pointed out
that the project may involve certain environmental and social
impacts on their society.
Project Objectives: The key objectives of the proposed road project, the safeguard
issues involved and how some impacted farmlands, plantations
and community structures have been identified for mitigation
measures and resettlement action plan were presented to the
Chairman and the participants. He made the audience to
appreciate that the project is a World Bank-assisted one which
requires that adequate environmental and social impact
assessments and mitigation measures have to be carried out for
the sustainability of the project.
Dr. Odunuga further reiterated that FPMU would embark on the
project and has also identified social and environmental issues that
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
99
the project will impact and what could be done to address the
potential negative impacts of the project.
He mentioned that all parties including members of Umuaniagu
community would be involved in the execution and management
of the proposed project before and during and after construction.
He further presented the list and extent of and led the meeting to
confirm and approve the landed property, farmlands, shrines and
structures which his team has identified under environmental and
social screening.
Deliberations, Approval
and Confirmation: Extensive consultations on the level of impacts the proposed road
would have on the community and their properties were made by
the audience. Both men and women from different families asked
pertinent questions and sought clarifications on the types of
impact, mitigation measures, resettlement action plans,
compensation and the construction programme and type to be
adopted. Both Engr. Nweke and Dr. Odunuga provided answers to
their questions and allayed their fears of either not being
compensated or environmental degradation.
An inspection of the identified landed properties, farmland, shrines
and structures that will be affected by the proposed project was
carried out jointly by the participants and the project team.
Based on this inspection exercise, the following properties were
confirmed by both parties as falling under environmental and
social impact.
vi. Three (3Nos.)Major Shrines on the RoW of the project road
vii. Cassava Farmland of an area of 4,500 Square metres.
viii. 281 Baskets of Cassava to be harvested from the cassava
farmland
ix. 63 Oil Palm Trees
x. 54 Other Economic Trees
The Chairman presented the outcome of the exercise to the house
and the whole house further confirmed and approved the above
five items as falling under environmental and social impact. He
further promised that these issues will be adequately taken care of
during project implementation.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
100
4.0 CLOSING
The Chairman commended the efforts of FPMU/SPIU and the World Bank for bringing
development projects to their area and promised and promised to give full
cooperation towards the success of the project.
The meeting came to a close at 1.30pm, Nigerian time.
SIGNED SIGNED
Mr. Joseph Nwobodo Dr. Shakirudeen Odunuga
Community Head Pheman Peniel
Consultants Ltd
SIGNED
Engr. Fidelis Nweke
State Coordinator, SPIU, Enugu State
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
101
Appendix D-3: MINUTES OF THE CONSULTATION AND NOTIFICATION MEETING
ON THE PROPOSED ADANI-ASABA-IGGA-OJOR ROAD (9.94kM) HELD IN OJOR ON THE
30TH MAY, 2012 AT 11.00AM
1.0 ATTENDANCE
i. Chairman, HRH. Igwe Emmanuel Umunna (Community Head)
ii. Engr. Fidelis Nweke, SPIU State Coordinator, Enugu State
iii. Dr. Shakirudeen Odunuga, Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
iv. Engr . Bidemi Bello, Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
v. Engr. S. Igwuodo, SPIU, Enugu State
vi. Engr. Nsiegbunam, SPIU State, Enugu State
vii. 20 Female Participants
viii. 20 Male Participants
2.0 OPENING
The meeting commenced at about 10.00am with Engr F. Nweke introducing members
of the team present. HRH. Igwe Emmanuel Umunna, who is the community/family
head and Chairman of the meeting, led the PAPs in introducing themselves one after
the other.
3.0 MEETING OBJECTIVES
Project Description: Engr. F. Nweke explained the intentions of FPMU/RAMP and the
objectives of RAMP to upgrade the rural road network in Enugu
State and particularly the construction of the 9.94kM long Adani-
Asaba-Igga-Ojor Road on the side of which their community lies.
He made the attendees to understand the need for their
participation in the realization of the objectives of the project and
continued consultation towards the success of the project. He
pointed out that the project may involve certain environmental
and social impacts which have been identified by the project
team.
Project Objectives: Dr. Odunuga explained the key objectives of the proposed road
project, the safeguard issues involved and how some farmlands,
plantations and community structures have been identified for as
falling under environmental and social impacts and resettlement
action plan to the Chairman and the participants. He made the
audience to appreciate that the project is a World Bank-assisted
one which requires that adequate care will be taken during project
implementation to prevent environmental degradation and
compensation should be paid to all those who are going to either
be displaced or relocated.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
102
Dr. Odunuga further reiterated that FPMU would embark on the
project and has also identified the associated environmental and
social impacts and what could be done to mitigate their potential
negative impacts.
He mentioned that all parties including members of Ojor
community would be involved in the execution and management
of the proposed project before and during and after construction.
He made them to understand that being stakeholders they would
be compensated for any loss of land, farm produce, shrines and
structures in accordance with the guidelines of the World Bank and
the Federal Ministry of the Environment. He further presented the list
and extent of and led the meeting to confirm and approve the
landed property, farmlands, shrines and structures which his team
has identified as falling under environmental and social impacts of
the proposed road project.
Deliberations, Approval
and Confirmation: The whole audience was engaged in extensive consultations on
the level of impacts the proposed road would have on the
community. Both men and women from different families asked
pertinent questions and sought clarifications on the types of
impact, mitigation measures, resettlement action plans,
compensation and the construction programme and type to be
adopted. Both Engr. Nweke and Dr. Odunuga provided answers to
their questions and allayed their fears of environmental
degradation and not being compensated.
The meeting rose and carried out an inspection of the identified
landed properties, farmland, shrines and structures that will be
affected by the proposed project.
Based on this inspection exercise, the following properties were
confirmed by the project team and the participants as coming
under environmental and social impacts of the proposed project.
i. Three (3Nos.)Major Shrines on the RoW of the project road
ii. Forty (40Nos.)Minor Shrines on the RoW of the project road
iii. Cassava Farmland of an area of 1,200 Square metres.
iv. Virgin land of an area of 3,600 Square metres.
v. 75 Baskets of Cassava to be harvested from the cassava
farmland
vi. A Transformer to be shifted.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
103
The Chairman presented the outcome of the exercise to the house
and the whole house further confirmed and approved the above
five items as coming under environmental and social impacts of
the proposed project.
4.0 CLOSING
The Chairman commended the efforts of FPMU/SPIU and the World Bank for bringing
development projects to their area, thanked the PAPs for honouring the invitation to
and participating meaningfully in the consultation and promised to give full support
towards the advancement of the project to realisation.
The meeting came to a close at 3.00pm, Nigerian time.
SIGNED SIGNED
HRH Igwe Emmanuel Umunna Dr. Shakirudeen Odunuga
Community Head Pheman Peniel
Consultants Ltd
SIGNED
Engr. Fidelis Nweke
State Coordinator, SPIU, Enugu State
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
104
APPENDIX E:
Summary of World Bank Environment and Social Safeguard Policies
Environment Assessment (OP 4.01). Outlines Bank policy and procedure for the
Environment assessment of Bank lending operations. The Bank undertakes
Environment screening of each proposed project to determine the appropriate
extent and type of EA process. This Environment process will apply to all sub-projects
to be funded by RAMP II.
Natural Habitats (OP 4.04). The conservation of natural habitats, like other measures
that protect and enhance the environment, is essential for long-term sustainable
development. The Bank does not support projects involving the significant
conversion of natural habitats unless there are no feasible alternatives for the
project and its citing, and comprehensive analysis demonstrates that overall
benefits from the project substantially outweigh the Environment costs. If the
Environment assessment indicates that a project would significantly convert or
degrade natural habitats, the project includes mitigation measures acceptable to
the Bank. Such mitigation measures include, as appropriate, minimizing habitat loss
(e.g. strategic habitat retention and post-development restoration) and establishing
and maintaining an ecologically similar protected area. The Bank accepts other
forms of mitigation measures only when they are technically justified. Should the sub-
project-specific ESMPs indicate that natural habitats might be affected negatively
by the proposed sub-project activities with suitable mitigation measures, such sub-
projects will not be funded under the RAMP II.
Pest Management (OP 4.09). The policy supports safe, affective, and Environmently
sound pest management. It promotes the use of biological and Environment control
methods. An assessment is made of the capacity of the country’s regulatory
framework and institutions to promote and support safe, effective, and
Environmently sound pest management. This policy will most likely not apply to
RAMP II
Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.12). This policy covers direct economic and social
impacts that both result from Bank-assisted investment projects, and are caused by
(a) the involuntary taking of land resulting in (i) relocation or loss of shelter; (ii) loss of
assets or access to assets, or (iii) loss of income sources or means of livelihood,
whether or not the affected persons must move to another location; or (b) the
involuntary restriction of access to legally designated parks and protected areas
resulting in adverse impacts on the livelihoods of the displaced persons. The other
safeguards instrument prepared for this project that is the Resettlement Policy
Framework (RPF) reports discuss the applicability of this policy in detail.
Indigenous Peoples (OD 4.20). This directive provides guidance to ensure that
indigenous peoples benefit from development projects, and to avoid or mitigate
adverse effects of Bank-financed development projects on indigenous peoples.
Measures to address issues pertaining to indigenous peoples must be based on the
informed participation of the indigenous people themselves. Sub-projects that
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
105
would have negative impacts on indigenous people will not be funded under RAMP
II
Forests (OP 4.36). This policy applies to the following types of Bank-financed
investment projects: (a) projects that have or may have impacts on the health and
quality of forests; (b) projects that affect the rights and welfare of people and their
level of dependence upon or interaction with forests; and (c) projects that aim to
bring about changes in the management, protection, or utilization of natural forests
or plantations, whether they are publicly, privately, or communally owned. The Bank
does not finance projects that, in its opinion, would involve significant conversion or
degradation of critical forest areas or related critical habitats. If a project involves
the significant conversion or degradation of natural forests or related natural
habitats that the Bank determines are not critical, and the Bank determines that
there are no feasible alternatives to the project and its siting, and comprehensive
analysis demonstrates that overall benefits from the project substantially outweigh
the Environment costs, the Bank may finance the project provided that it
incorporates appropriate mitigation measures. Sub-projects that are likely to have
negative impacts on forests will not be funded under the proposed project.
Cultural Property (OPN 11.03). The term “cultural property” includes sites having
archeological (prehistoric), paleontological, historical, religious, and unique natural
values. The Bank’s general policy regarding cultural property is to assist in their
preservation, and to seek to avoid their elimination. Specifically, the Bank (i)
normally declines to finance projects that will significantly damage non-replicable
cultural property, and will assist only those projects that are sited or designed so as
to prevent such damage; and (ii) will assist in the protection and enhancement of
cultural properties encountered in Bank-financed projects, rather than leaving that
protection to chance. The management of cultural property of a country is the
responsibility of the government. The government’s attention should be drawn
specifically to what is known about the cultural property aspects of the proposed
project site and appropriate agencies, NGOs, or university departments should be
consulted; if there are any questions concerning cultural property in the area, a brief
reconnaissance survey should be undertaken in the field by a specialist. This project
will not fund sub-projects that will have negative impacts on cultural property.
Safety of Dams (OP 4.37). For the life of any dam, the owner is responsible for
ensuring that appropriate measures are taken and sufficient resources provided for
the safety to the dam, irrespective of its funding sources or construction status. The
Bank distinguishes between small and large dams. Small dams are normally less than
15 m in height; this category includes, for example, farm ponds, local silt retention
dams, and low embankment tanks. For small dams, generic dam safety measures
designed by qualified engineers are usually adequate. This policy does not apply to
RAMP II since the policy is not triggered under the project.
Projects on International Waterways (O7.50). The Bank recognizes that the
cooperation and good will of riparians is essential for the efficient utilization and
protection of international waterways and attaches great importance to riparians
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
106
making appropriate agreements or arrangement for the entire waterway or any
part thereof. Projects that trigger this policy include hydroelectric, irrigation, flood
control, navigation,
drainage, water and sewerage, industrial, and similar projects that involve the use or
potential pollution of international waterways. This policy will not apply to RAMP II
.
Disputed Areas (OP/BP/GP 7.60). Project in disputed areas may occur, the Bank and
its member countries as well as between the borrower and one or more
neighbouring countries. Any dispute over an area in which a proposed project is
located requires formal procedures at the earliest possible stage. The Bank attempts
to acquire assurance that it may proceed with a project in a disputed area if the
governments concerned agree that, pending the settlement of the dispute, the
project proposed can go forward without prejudice to the claims of the country
having a dispute. This policy is not expected to be triggered by sub-projects. This
policy is unlikely to be triggered by sub-projects to be funded under the proposed
project.
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
107
APPENDIX F: Table AP4.1: Accessibility and Mobility Data for Six (6) High Priority Intervention Areas
#.
INTERVENTION
AREA
Length of
Paved
Road(kM)
Length of
Unpaved
Road (kM)
Length of
Tracks/
Footpaths
(kM)
Length of
Rivers/
Stream
(kM)
Area
of
Highlands
(kM2)
Area
of Plane
Land (kM2)
Number
of
Vehicles
Motor
Parks
(Number)
Dist. b/w
IA and
SC (kM)
1. Aninri/Awgu 142.60 452.1 62.88 149.5 267.09 390.79 9,000 2 59.0
2. Nkanu West/
Nkanu East/
Enugu South
222.25
465.15
77.13
208.0
61.84
865.55
26,650
3
18.70
3. Isi Uzo 0.00 245.5 86.50 222.0 34.82 652.80 2,500 1 195.0
4. Uzo Uwani 19.0 373.80 88 62.125 275.48 459.14 3,530 1 70.0
5. Udi 273.0 321.00 151.5 85.40 254.42 563.36 7,170 1 32.0
6.
Oji River
/Ezeagu
92.3
699.20
58.13
157.50
101.68
711.77
14,352
2
30.00
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
108
APPENDIX F: Table AP4.2: Economic Efficiency Data for Six (6) High Priority Intervention Areas
#.
INTERVENTION
AREA
Agric
Farmland
Area(Ha)
Value of
Agric
Produce
(NGN)
Transport
Fare
(NGN)
Area of
Forest
(Ha)
Annual
Total
Revenue
(NGN)
Annual
Expend. on
Health
(NGN)
Annual
Expend
on Educ
(NGN)
Annual
Expend
on Econs
Services
(NGN)
Annual
Expend
on
Services
(NGN)
1. Aninri/Awgu 52.07 26.04M 250 46.6 886.4M 101.35M 18.33M 9.06M 58.63M
2. Nkanu West/
Nkanu East/
Enugu South
50.78
25.40M
250
-
1,395M
130.37M
23.12M
159.12M
49.83M
3. Isi Uzo 31.24 15.62M 450 140 621.M 47.4M 6.34M 45.25M 42.21M
4. Uzo Uwani 5,364.55 2,682.3M 600 - 377.5M 60.7M 6.21M 75.56M 37.5M
5. Udi 15.63 7.82M 200 911.0 496.1M 62.2M 13.73M 57.20M 37.6M
6. Oji River
/Ezeagu
2,730.52
1,365.3M
200
1,248.6
845.5M
87.3M
7.42M
90.87M
62.0M
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
109
APPENDIX F: Table AP4.3: Social Impact Data for Six (6) High Priority Intervention Areas
#.
INTERVENTION
AREA
Number of
Hospitals
Number of
Primary
Schools
Number of
Secondary
Schools
Enrolment in
Primary
Schools
Enrolment in
Secondary
Schools
Population
Number of
Markets/
Industries
1. Aninri/Awgu 73 150 41 31,756 15,707 331,857 32
2. Nkanu West/
Nkanu East/
Enugu South
150
156
46
32,899
32,604
494,192
47
3. Isi Uzo 34 83 8 11,659 6,060 148,415 14
4. Uzo Uwani 43 59 14 10,500 4,496 124,480 27
5. Udi 52 98 28 12,875 11,766 234,002 26
6. Oji River
/Ezeagu
90
161
41
20,052
13,033
296,305
40
ESIA Report Enugu State RAMP 2 06/2012 Pheman Peniel Consultants Ltd
110