12
Grade 3-5 Embedded Professional Development October 22, 23, 2014 Running Records & Multisyllabic Blending Routine

Running Records & Multisyllabic Blending Routine

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Running Records & Multisyllabic Blending Routine

Grade 3-5 Embedded Professional Development

October 22, 23, 2014Running Records & Multisyllabic Blending

Routine

Page 2: Running Records & Multisyllabic Blending Routine

Fall 2014 Data Profile Local Grades 3-5 Cohort

(Teachers are beginning to systematically differentiate their Common Core Aligned Expeditionary Learning lessons. They are targeting the specific needs of students as noted by DIBELS Benchmark Running Records)

(See data sheets for individual performance)

Authenticity!

Page 3: Running Records & Multisyllabic Blending Routine

Grade 3 According to DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency with Miscue Analysis

and Error Patterns, 48.13% of Grade 3 students are not meeting benchmark norms for oral reading fluency. The Miscue Analysis identifies that this cohort of students have strengths with the visual cueing system and deficits with the meaning and structure cueing systems. The error patterns are predominantly found at the word part/syllable and the word level (multisyllabic words).

According to DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency with Miscue Analysis and Error Patterns, 51.85% of Grade 3 students are meeting benchmark norms for oral reading fluency. The Miscue Analysis identifies that this cohort of students have strengths with the visual, meaning and structure cueing systems. The error patterns are predominantly found at the word level (multisyllabic words) and with sequencing meaningful text details as part of retells.

Our Students and Their Patterns

Page 4: Running Records & Multisyllabic Blending Routine

Grade 4 According to DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency with Miscue Analysis

and Error Patterns, 69.69% of Grade 4 students are not meeting benchmark norms for oral reading fluency. The Miscue Analysis identifies that this cohort of students have strengths with the visual cueing system and deficits with the meaning and structure cueing systems. The error patterns are predominantly found at the word part/syllable and the word level (multisyllabic words).

According to DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency with Miscue Analysis and Error Patterns, 30.3% of Grade 4 students are meeting benchmark norms for oral reading fluency. The Miscue Analysis identifies that this cohort of students have strengths with the visual, meaning and structure cueing systems. The error patterns are predominantly found at the word level (multisyllabic words) and with sequencing meaningful text details as part of retells.

Our Students and Their Patterns

Page 5: Running Records & Multisyllabic Blending Routine

Grade 5 According to DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency with Miscue Analysis

and Error Patterns, 63.63% of Grade 5 students are not meeting benchmark norms for oral reading fluency. The Miscue Analysis identifies that this cohort of students have strengths with the visual cueing system and deficits with the meaning and structure cueing systems. The error patterns are predominantly found at the word part/syllable and the word level (multisyllabic words).

According to DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency with Miscue Analysis and Error Patterns, 36.36% of Grade 5 students are meeting benchmark norms for oral reading fluency. The Miscue Analysis identifies that this cohort of students have strengths with the visual, meaning and structure cueing systems. The error patterns are predominantly found at the word level (multisyllabic words) and with sequencing meaningful text details as part of retells.

Our Students and Their Patterns

Page 6: Running Records & Multisyllabic Blending Routine

1. We will follow DIBELS ORF norms. 2. Stop the watch when necessary to make

students articulate the words. Then restart! 3. Be sure to pay attention to the reader's

behavior. Is the student using meaning (M), structural (S), and visual (V) cues to read words and gather meaning?

4. Score and analyze the Running Record by observing, miscue, error, accuracy and self-correct patterns.

Running Record Assessment

Page 7: Running Records & Multisyllabic Blending Routine

What are Meaning Cues?What are Structure Cues?What are Visual Cues?

Running Record Assessment

M s

v

M s

v

See The Teachers Guide TCWRP

Page 8: Running Records & Multisyllabic Blending Routine

Error patterns…what are they?

Substitutes another word for a word in the text

Omits a word Inserts a word Has to be told a word Mispronounces a word, or parts of a word

Running Record Assessment

Page 9: Running Records & Multisyllabic Blending Routine

“The f_______s of the c______n f______d a d________t c______t. They saw the need for a strong n_______l g_________t. At the same time, they did not want to take away all p_____r from the states. Like most A_________s, they b________d that state g___________t would better u__________d the special needs and c__________s of their c__________s.”

Page 10: Running Records & Multisyllabic Blending Routine

“The framers of the constitution faced a difficult conflict. They saw the need for a strong national government. At the same time, they did not want to take away all power from the states. Like most Americans, they believed that state government would better understand the special needs and concerns of their citizens.”

Page 11: Running Records & Multisyllabic Blending Routine

Decoding Instruction often ends with 2nd grade:– Unfortunately, the number of multisyllabic words begins to dramatically increase in third grade.

The longer words are often content words that carry the meaning of the passage.

Many new words in intermediate and secondary material– From 5th grade on, the average studentsencounter approximately 10,000 new wordsthat they have never previously encounteredin print.

Why Multisyllabic Blending?

Page 12: Running Records & Multisyllabic Blending Routine

The Multisyllabic Blending Routine

Lets Explore