1
t ruCOLLECT , a novel blood collection, stabilization, and DNA extraction system specifically designed for use in NGS Hamid Khoja Brian Packard James Han Vanessa Process Gary Smejkal Sarah Rudawsky Julie Donaldson James Laugharn Covaris, Inc. • 14 Gill Street, Unit H, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801-1721 USA Tel: +1 781-932-3959 • Fax: +1 781-932-8705 Email: [email protected] Web: www.covarisinc.com INTRODUCTION Nucleic acid-based diagnostics are rapidly moving toward next-generation sequencing (NGS). Venipuncture blood is commonly the sample of choice for high quality DNA purification, but the logistics of blood collection, stabilization, shipping/storage, and DNA extraction remain complex. Current blood collection methods require a professional phlebotomist, leak-proof overnight shipping on ice or cold-packs, and a time-critical labor- intensive DNA extraction workflow. Collectively these complexities create logistical and financial barriers for patients, researchers and clinicians. Dried blood holds the potential to overcome these barriers, however, the currently variable collection, variable stabilization, and unreliable DNA extraction, all of which effect yield and quality, has prevented its adoption for most NGS-based applications. In this poster, we introduce truCOLLECT™, a novel blood collection system which does not require a venous blood draw and greatly simplifies blood collection, standardizes dry stabilization, and simplifies shipment while delivering DNA yield and quality comparable to fresh whole blood. RESULTS FIGURE 2. Blood from the same donor was used for the extraction of DNA from both whole blood and dry-stabilized blood on truCOLLECT. Total DNA yield from 100 μl of whole blood was 2.1 μg compared to 1.5 μg of DNA from 85 µl of dry-stabilized blood on truCOLLECT. The yield of DNA per μl of blood is greater than 80% of what was obtained from whole blood, and greater than four times what has been reported in the literature from dried blood spots. FIGURE 3. qPCR based inhibition assay testing for DNA polymerase inhibitors indicated reduced inhibition for DNA extracted from dry-stabilized truCOLLECT as compared to whole blood. FIGURE 4. qPCR based genomic DNA quality assessment indicated equivalent quality for truCOLLECT extracted DNA as compared to DNA extracted from whole blood. This indicates that the quality of the extracted DNA is not compromised as a result of dry stabilization and AFA- based extraction. Equivalent Whole Genome Sequencing metrics FIGURE 5. GC coverage distribution of all the mapped reads for the truCOLLECT and the Whole Blood samples are consistent with GC content of the human genome indicating that no sequence bias was introduced in the stabilization or the extraction process. The slight shift in the truCOLLECT chart is due to the slightly lower number of reads from the truCOLLECT sample. FIGURE 6. truCOLLECT and Whole Blood DNA samples were sheared with Covaris AFA. Equivalent and unbiased base insertion distribution was observed indicating lack of shearing bias or DNA degradation in the truCOLLECT sample that is comparable to DNA extracted from whole blood. FIGURE 7. Whole genome sequencing coverage depth obtained from truCOLLECT extracted DNA is comparable to the coverage depth obtained from DNA extracted from fresh blood. Although both samples were sequenced at a read density to obtain an average coverage of 10x, analysis indicated greater number of reads sequenced at over the desired 10X coverage with the truCOLLECT extracted DNA. FIGURE 8. DNA extracted from truCOLLECT exhibited greater coverage depth in GC-rich regions of chromosome 19 as compared to DNA extracted from whole blood. This slightly increases the average coverage of chromosome 19 to 12.5x for truCOLLECT, as compared to 10.7 for whole blood. CONCLUSION Efficient extraction of DNA from dry-stabilized blood for NGS-based applications is made possible by the use of Covaris Adaptive Focused Acoustics (AFA). The focused short acoustic wavelength generated by Covaris AFA not only allows for an active, rapid rehydration of dried blood, but also promotes effective, high yield extraction and release of high-quality, clinical-grade DNA from the solid absorbent filament matrix of the truCOLLECT. These observations are in marked comparison to traditional non-active methods for sequencing DNA from dried blood samples, which routinely do not deliver acceptable quantities, let alone qualities of template. While yield and PCR inhibition are convenient metrics to infer likely performance, information gathered from sequencing results provide the best indication of quality. Analysis of the sequencing results from an experiment comparing whole blood to that of truCOLLECT dry-stabilized blood indicated a clear equivalency in quality with the two different DNA stabilization and extraction methods. Whole genome sequencing results from truCOLLECT extracted DNA generated greater coverage depth across the genome, and coverage uniformity similar to that of DNA extracted from whole blood. Q30 scores from the sequencing run were also near equivalent with a score of 37.6 for whole blood, and 37.7 for blood extracted from truCOLLECT. Gene rich and GC-rich regions of the genome also sequenced at a higher coverage depth with truCOLLECT-stabilized samples, indicating an improvement in the library representation for those regions. The single nucleotide variant error rates for both the whole blood, and truCOLLECT samples were less than 5% at 10X coverage. While these results indicate that the truCOLLECT method of sample collection, dry-stabilization, and AFA extraction is suitable for obtaining NGS-quality DNA from dry-stabilized blood, further experiments need to be carried out to characterize the full benefits of our novel system. truCOLLECT, along with Covaris AFA, enables a decentralized sample collection, stabilization, storage, and DNA extraction workflow from blood for small and large scale genomic studies without the logistical and financial complexities associated with whole blood. REFERENCES 1. Langmead B, Salzberg S. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature Methods. 2012, 9:357-359.J.T. Robinson, H. Thorvaldsdóttir, W. Winckler, M. Guttman, E. S. Lander, G. Getz, J.P. Mesirov. Integrative Genomics Viewer. Nature Biotechnology 29, 24–26 (2011) 2. A.R. Quinlan, I.M. Hall BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features Bioinformatics, Vol. 26, No. 6. (2010) 3. Li H.*, Handsaker B.*, Wysoker A., Fennell T., Ruan J., Homer N., Marth G., Abecasis G., Durbin R. and 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup.The Sequence alignment/map (SAM) format and SAMtools.(2009) 4. Petr Danecek, Adam Auton, Goncalo Abecasis, Cornelis A. Albers, Eric Banks, Mark A. DePristo, Robert Handsaker, Gerton Lunter, Gabor Marth, Stephen T. Sherry, Gilean McVean, Richard Durbin and 1000 Genomes Project Analysis Group, Variant Call Format and VCF Tools, Bioinformatics, 2011 5. Giardine B, Riemer C, Hardison RC, Burhans R, Elnitski L, Shah P, Zhang Y, Blankenberg D, Albert I, Taylor J, Miller W, Kent WJ, Nekrutenko A. "Galaxy: a platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis." Genome Research. 2005 Oct; 15(10):1451-5. 6. Blankenberg D, Von Kuster G, Coraor N, Ananda G, Lazarus R, Mangan M, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J. "Galaxy: a web-based genome analysis tool for experimentalists". Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. 2010 Jan; Chapter 19:Unit 19.10.1-21. 7. Goecks, J, Nekrutenko, A, Taylor, J and The Galaxy Team. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol. 2010 Aug 25;11(8):R86. FIGURE 1. Comprehensive workflow designed for NGS Collect and Barcode • Minimally invasive blood draw of 15 to 85 µl • Transfer sample to the truCOLLECT device using an FDA-approved EDTA-coated capillary • The sample is permanently attached to a 2D barcoded cap and the identifier is maintained throughout the workflow • Designed for extraction of up to 85 µl of whole blood Dry-Stabilize in Closed Vessel • The truCOLLECT cap with fiber is inserted into the desiccant container and sealed • The sealed container allows for consisten dry- stabilization • The sealed container also precents sample-to-sample and environment-to-sample contamination Ship and/or Store • Ship at ambient temperature via regular mail, courier, or express mail • Store at ambient temperature • Containers are also available if long term storage is required (-80° C) Re-hydrate and Extract • Actively re-hydrate and extract your biomarker using Covaris Adaptive Focused Acoustics (AFA-energetics™) • Optimized extraction buffers and active AFA processing ensure the efficient release of high quality, clinical-grade biomarkers MATERIALS AND METHODS gDNA Extraction Whole blood samples: 100 µL aliquots of EDTA Whole Blood were extracted using the Macherey-Nagel NucleoSpin Blood kit, and gDNA eluted in 100 µL of volume of elution buffer. truCOLLECT samples: 85 µL aliquots of EDTA Whole Blood were absorbed to truCOLLECT cap and fiber assemblies and placed in desiccating containers (provided with truCOLLECT kit) and stored at room temperature for 72 hours. truCOLLECT 2D bar-coded cap and fiber assemblies were then placed in provided microTUBE containing 130 µL of sterile phosphate buffered saline. Blood rehydration, extraction, and fragmentation were performed with a Covaris E220 Focused-ultrasonicator (capable of 96 well processing) with AFA-energetics™. gDNA was purified using the Macherey-Nagel NucleoSpin Blood kit and eluted in 80 µL volume of elution buffer. Inhibition Assay Our in-house SYBR® Green SPUD qPCR assay consists of an artificial template and PCR primers. The artificial template is spiked into the test samples, and its effect on Ct is quantitated. Calculation of the Ct value of the test sample vs. water control provides a measurable effect on amplification. Genomic DNA Quantification and QC Kit KAPA genomic DNA Quantification and QC kit was used to determine the quality of the of the DNA sample following the kit protocol Sequencing and data analysis ~2 µg of DNA from each sample type were submitted to Elim Biopharmaceuticals Inc. for 2x100bp whole genome sequencing using an Illumina HiSeq2500. Reads were aligned using Bowtie2 software package. Coverage analysis of the aligned reads was carried out using BedTools software package. Whole genome coverage analysis and viewing was carried out using Broad Institutes IGV package. Quality metrics and variant analysis were carried out using Broad Institute’s Picard tools. truCOLLECT : Comparable yield and quality to whole blood DNA

ruCOLLECT, a novel blood collection, Hamid Khoja Brian ... · James Han Vanessa Process Gary Smejkal Sarah Rudawsky Julie Donaldson James Laugharn Covaris, Inc. • 14 Gill Street,

  • Upload
    vanngoc

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

truCOLLECT™, a novel blood collection, stabilization, and DNA extraction system specifically designed for use in NGS

Hamid KhojaBrian PackardJames HanVanessa ProcessGary SmejkalSarah RudawskyJulie DonaldsonJames Laugharn

Covaris, Inc. • 14 Gill Street, Unit H, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801-1721 USA

Tel: +1 781-932-3959 • Fax: +1 781-932-8705 Email: [email protected]: www.covarisinc.com

INTRODUCTIONNucleic acid-based diagnostics are rapidly moving toward next-generation sequencing (NGS). Venipuncture

blood is commonly the sample of choice for high quality DNA purification, but the logistics of blood collection,

stabilization, shipping/storage, and DNA extraction remain complex. Current blood collection methods require

a professional phlebotomist, leak-proof overnight shipping on ice or cold-packs, and a time-critical labor-

intensive DNA extraction workflow. Collectively these complexities create logistical and financial barriers for

patients, researchers and clinicians. Dried blood holds the potential to overcome these barriers, however, the

currently variable collection, variable stabilization, and unreliable DNA extraction, all of which effect yield and

quality, has prevented its adoption for most NGS-based applications.

In this poster, we introduce truCOLLECT™, a novel blood collection system which does not require a venous

blood draw and greatly simplifies blood collection, standardizes dry stabilization, and simplifies shipment

while delivering DNA yield and quality comparable to fresh whole blood.

RESULTS

FIGURE 2. Blood from the same donor was used for the extraction of DNA from both whole blood and dry-stabilized blood on truCOLLECT. Total DNA yield from 100 μl of whole blood was 2.1 μg compared to 1.5 μg of DNA from 85 µl of dry-stabilized blood on truCOLLECT. The yield of DNA per μl of blood is greater than 80% of what was obtained from whole blood, and greater than four times what has been reported in the literature from dried blood spots.

FIGURE 3. qPCR based inhibition assay testing for DNA polymerase inhibitors indicated reduced inhibition for DNA extracted from dry-stabilized truCOLLECT as compared to whole blood.

FIGURE 4. qPCR based genomic DNA quality assessment indicated equivalent quality for truCOLLECT extracted DNA as compared to DNA extracted from whole blood. This indicates that the quality of the extracted DNA is not compromised as a result of dry stabilization and AFA-based extraction.

Equivalent Whole Genome Sequencing metrics

FIGURE 5. GC coverage distribution of all the mapped reads for the truCOLLECT and the Whole Blood samples are consistent with GC content of the human genome indicating that no sequence bias was introduced in the stabilization or the extraction process. The slight shift in the truCOLLECT chart is due to the slightly lower number of reads from the truCOLLECT sample.

FIGURE 6. truCOLLECT and Whole Blood DNA samples were sheared with Covaris AFA. Equivalent and unbiased base insertion distribution was observed indicating lack of shearing bias or DNA degradation in the truCOLLECT sample that is comparable to DNA extracted from whole blood.

FIGURE 7. Whole genome sequencing coverage depth obtained from truCOLLECT extracted DNA is comparable to the coverage depth obtained from DNA extracted from fresh blood. Although both samples were sequenced at a read density to obtain an average coverage of 10x, analysis indicated greater number of reads sequenced at over the desired 10X coverage with the truCOLLECT extracted DNA.

FIGURE 8. DNA extracted from truCOLLECT exhibited greater coverage depth in GC-rich regions of chromosome 19 as compared to DNA extracted from whole blood. This slightly increases the average coverage of chromosome 19 to 12.5x for truCOLLECT, as compared to 10.7 for whole blood.

CONCLUSIONEfficient extraction of DNA from dry-stabilized blood for NGS-based applications is made possible by the use of Covaris

Adaptive Focused Acoustics (AFA). The focused short acoustic

wavelength generated by Covaris AFA not only allows for an

active, rapid rehydration of dried blood, but also promotes

effective, high yield extraction and release of high-quality,

clinical-grade DNA from the solid absorbent filament matrix of

the truCOLLECT. These observations are in marked comparison

to traditional non-active methods for sequencing DNA from

dried blood samples, which routinely do not deliver acceptable

quantities, let alone qualities of template.

While yield and PCR inhibition are convenient metrics to infer

likely performance, information gathered from sequencing

results provide the best indication of quality. Analysis of the

sequencing results from an experiment comparing whole blood

to that of truCOLLECT dry-stabilized blood indicated a clear

equivalency in quality with the two different DNA stabilization

and extraction methods.

Whole genome sequencing results from truCOLLECT extracted

DNA generated greater coverage depth across the genome,

and coverage uniformity similar to that of DNA extracted from

whole blood. Q30 scores from the sequencing run were also

near equivalent with a score of 37.6 for whole blood, and 37.7 for

blood extracted from truCOLLECT. Gene rich and GC-rich regions

of the genome also sequenced at a higher coverage depth with

truCOLLECT-stabilized samples, indicating an improvement in the

library representation for those regions. The single nucleotide

variant error rates for both the whole blood, and truCOLLECT

samples were less than 5% at 10X coverage.

While these results indicate that the truCOLLECT method of

sample collection, dry-stabilization, and AFA extraction is suitable

for obtaining NGS-quality DNA from dry-stabilized blood, further

experiments need to be carried out to characterize the full

benefits of our novel system. truCOLLECT, along with Covaris

AFA, enables a decentralized sample collection, stabilization,

storage, and DNA extraction workflow from blood for small and

large scale genomic studies without the logistical and financial

complexities associated with whole blood.

REFERENCES1. Langmead B, Salzberg S. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature

Methods. 2012, 9:357-359.J.T. Robinson, H. Thorvaldsdóttir, W. Winckler, M. Guttman, E. S. Lander, G. Getz, J.P. Mesirov. Integrative Genomics Viewer. Nature Biotechnology 29, 24–26 (2011)

2. A.R. Quinlan, I.M. Hall BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features Bioinformatics, Vol. 26, No. 6. (2010)

3. Li H.*, Handsaker B.*, Wysoker A., Fennell T., Ruan J., Homer N., Marth G., Abecasis G., Durbin R. and 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup.The Sequence alignment/map (SAM) format and SAMtools.(2009)

4. Petr Danecek, Adam Auton, Goncalo Abecasis, Cornelis A. Albers, Eric Banks, Mark A. DePristo, Robert Handsaker, Gerton Lunter, Gabor Marth, Stephen T. Sherry, Gilean McVean, Richard Durbin and 1000 Genomes Project Analysis Group, Variant Call Format and VCF Tools, Bioinformatics, 2011

5. Giardine B, Riemer C, Hardison RC, Burhans R, Elnitski L, Shah P, Zhang Y, Blankenberg D, Albert I, Taylor J, Miller W, Kent WJ, Nekrutenko A. "Galaxy: a platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis." Genome Research. 2005 Oct; 15(10):1451-5.

6. Blankenberg D, Von Kuster G, Coraor N, Ananda G, Lazarus R, Mangan M, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J. "Galaxy: a web-based genome analysis tool for experimentalists". Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. 2010 Jan; Chapter 19:Unit 19.10.1-21.

7. Goecks, J, Nekrutenko, A, Taylor, J and The Galaxy Team. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol. 2010 Aug 25;11(8):R86.

Figure 1. Comprehensive workflow designed for NGS

Collect and Barcode• Minimally invasive blood draw of 15 to 85 µl

• Transfer sample to the truCOLLECT device using an FDA-approved EDTA-coated capillary

• The sample is permanently attached to a 2D barcoded cap and the identifier is maintained throughout the workflow

• Designed for extraction of up to 85 µl of whole blood

Dry-Stabilize in Closed Vessel• The truCOLLECT cap with fiber is inserted into the

desiccant container and sealed

• The sealed container allows for consisten dry-stabilization

• The sealed container also precents sample-to-sample and environment-to-sample contamination

Ship and/or Store• Ship at ambient temperature via regular mail, courier,

or express mail

• Store at ambient temperature

• Containers are also available if long term storage is required (-80° C)

re-hydrate and extract• Actively re-hydrate and extract your biomarker using

Covaris Adaptive Focused Acoustics (AFA-energetics™)

• Optimized extraction buffers and active AFA processing ensure the efficient release of high quality, clinical-grade biomarkers

MATERIALS AND METHODSgDNA ExtractionWhole blood samples: 100 µL aliquots of EDTA Whole Blood were extracted using the Macherey-Nagel NucleoSpin Blood kit, and gDNA eluted in 100 µL of volume of elution buffer.

truCOLLECT samples: 85 µL aliquots of EDTA Whole Blood were absorbed to truCOLLECT cap and fiber assemblies and placed in desiccating containers (provided with truCOLLECT kit) and stored at room temperature for 72 hours. truCOLLECT 2D bar-coded cap and fiber assemblies were then placed in provided microTUBE containing 130 µL of sterile phosphate buffered saline. Blood rehydration, extraction, and fragmentation were performed with a Covaris E220 Focused-ultrasonicator (capable of 96 well processing) with AFA-energetics™. gDNA was purified using the Macherey-Nagel NucleoSpin Blood kit and eluted in 80 µL volume of elution buffer.

Inhibition AssayOur in-house SYBR® Green SPUD qPCR assay consists of an artificial template and PCR primers. The artificial template is spiked into the test samples, and its effect on Ct is quantitated. Calculation of the Ct value of the test sample vs. water control provides a measurable effect on amplification.

Genomic DNA Quantification and QC KitKAPA genomic DNA Quantification and QC kit was used to determine the quality of the of the DNA sample following the kit protocol

Sequencing and data analysis~2 µg of DNA from each sample type were submitted to Elim Biopharmaceuticals Inc. for 2x100bp whole genome sequencing using an Illumina HiSeq2500. Reads were aligned using Bowtie2 software package. Coverage analysis of the aligned reads was carried out using BedTools software package. Whole genome coverage analysis and viewing was carried out using Broad Institutes IGV package. Quality metrics and variant analysis were carried out using Broad Institute’s Picard tools.

truCOLLECT : Comparable yield and quality to whole blood DNA