BOWDIDGEConsulting Geologists

iwdldge and Associates Ltd.fi 8 Amelia Street Toronto, Ontario M4X l E4(416)9206145

31CeSNEeel l Z . 5978 MARMORA 010

REPORT ON VLF-ELECTROMAGNETIC

AND SELF-POTENTIAL SURVEYS

ACKERMAN GOLD PROPERTY

MARMORA TOWNSHIP

EASTERN ONTARIO MINING DIVISION

C. R. Bowdidge, M.A., Ph.D

2 November 1983

"OV

- l -

INTRODUCTION

During September 1983, VLF-EM and self-potential surveys were carried

out over the two-claim Ackerman gold property in Marmora Township.

Lines at 400 ft. spacing had previously been cut for magnetic and geolrr

ogical surveys, and the same lines were used for these surveys.

PROPERTY, LOCATION AND ACCESS

The property consists of two claims:

EO 538210 N/2 of E/2, Lot 6, Con VIII

EO 538211 S/2 of E/2, Lot 6, Con VIII

The claims are situated 4 miles east of the town of Marmora. Provincial

highway 7 runs a few hundred feet north of the north boundary of the

property.

GEOLOGY

The property has been mapped geologically by R. Ekstrom. The eastern

portion is underlain by granite or syenite of the Deloro pluton, while

the remainder is underlain mainly by clastic metasediments with a north-

south strike and a moderate westerly dip.

VLF-EM SURVEY

The survey was carried out using a Geonics EM-16 receiver tuned to

transmitter NSS at Annapolis, Maryland (21.4 KHz). Readings of in-phase

and quadrature were taken at 50 ft. intervals. They are plotted in

profile form on the map.

- 2 -

Readings along the western part of line 20S are unreliable because

of the presence of a power line.

Eight conductive zones have been defined by the survey. They are des

ignated by the letters "A" to "H" on the accompanying map. The amplitude

of the anomalies varies greatly, but the character is always the same

with a quadrature which varies sympathetically with the in-phase.

This is indicative of weak to moderate conductivity, either overburden-

related or of shear type.

SELF-POTENTIAL SURVEY

The self-potential survey was carried out using a fixed electrode and

a moving electrode connected by a cable which was unreeled as the survey

progressed along each line. The electrodes were standard porous pots

containing saturated copper sulphate solution. The potential was meas

ured using a Beckmann digital voltmeter with a sensitivity of * l milli

volt and an input impedance of 18 megohms. Line-to-line correction

was based on the assumption that a large body of water such as the

Moira River which crosses all the lines will be at a constant potential.

Points on the immediate water's edge were assigned an arbitrary potential

of zero. The results are plotted on the map in profile form. Negative

peaks are anomalies.

There are four SP anomalies, designated l to 4 on the map. No. l is

the strongest and it corresponds with VLF conductor E. It is paralleled

to the west by a second anomaly, no. 2, which may be the results of

random fluctuation superimposed on the down-dip "tail" of anomaly 1.

- 3 -

Anomaly no. 3 is rather weak. It lies on the southward strike extension

of VLF conductor F. Anomaly 4 is also weak. It does not coincide with

a VLF conductor, but it does appear to be related to the main Ackerman

gold-bearing vein.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The SP survey has clearly responded to gold-arsenopyrite-quartz vein

mineralization and is therefore an important tool in exploration in the

area. Two new targets have been located by this survey which warrant

drilling. SP anomaly 1/VLF conductor E may be a sulphide-rich zone

and should be drilled. While VLF anomaly F appears to have been tested

by an old drill hole, the more important SP anomaly 3 has not been

tested and should be drilled.

Respectfully submitted,

C. R. Bowdidge, M.A., Ph.D.

Ministry of Natural

Ontario

Report of Work ^^3 -.33j es (Geophysical, Geological,^y^fL^y. ^

' ^ Geochemical and Expenditures) fA-T^i S~

L- H-B The Mini 31C85NE8ei1 2 .5978 MARMORA

Type of Survey(s)900

Claim Holder ( t)

P.D&egJ' L.W- g

Aw b SBLF -Prospector's Licence No.

A 41072Add res.

Survey Company

-3M3Date of Survey (from 81 to) Tottl Miles of lint Cut

"NIL.Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

IXlS/mO tWngjQM ir l ftgg

is- 09* w* *~j? O *a* IV "l **~'

Day j Mo. | Yr. Day | Mo. Yr.IS

,, -S?3

Qb. 2.LCredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days perClaim

2.0

20

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

M'ming'fclaims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

y

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

SInstructions

Tottl Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Mining ClaimPrefix

E.G.

A1

Number

f^* ^ di 7 1 f^^^^ J 1^5 ^-T 1 ^^^

5-38211

Expand. Days Cr.

n *" f b i fli ^ p l vSf-.P 'J

WUN:r4'o L4

MINING RECORDS OFF

5) E B l? l|

' - 198

KtJtrs

C^40R6ft

VIEfi tar" iSEP 1 9 TOMi8i9ilpjll|lg|l|gj3idi

'

r t

3

TO

IISK

Mining ClaimPrefix

D *#

Number f*

i

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

Expend. Days Cr.

2

Certification Verifying RepoJt of V^ork1 hereby certify that 1 have a person'al and intirnate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

DUSAAJ ib/w/T/eovX/c )Z8tf Qj~ftis-rop\ke^ 1®J) /J/SS/tt/MfaJAJT J^&J 2.i*jDate Certified ICert^fed by (^ignature)

'

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

FUe.l

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey (s). Township or Area.

Claim Holder(s)_

Survey Company. Author of Report.

D -

. 80^®

Address of Author ST T

Covering Dates of Survey.

Total Miles of Line Cut—(linecutting to office)

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer——Radiometric——

DAYS per claim

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit* do not apply to airborne lurveyi)

Magnetometer. Electromagnetic Radiometric(enter days per claim)

HATR- -*of ReAuthor of Report or Agent

Res, Geol.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

(prefix)

.....5:

(number)

K

•r

1883

TOTAL CLAIMS-

83? (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations____*.aO ___________________Number of Readings exp O

Station interval ____?~x^ 4-c^7~_________________Line sparing Profile c^le 1" * 4*.* * ( S f ) S " ~

Contour interval M fi

Instrument —^^———.^^—

Accuracy — Scale constant.

S

O

H "C, N2 H

Diurnal correction method.

Base Station check-in interval (hours).

Base Station location and value ^..,^.

Instrument •••t-s e H-S 6 .Coil configuration

Coil separation —.

Accuracy ^^—^—

Method: d Fixed transmitter D Shoot back d In line Q Parallel line

(specify V.L.r. station)

Parameters

InstrumentScale constant

Corrections made.

Base station value and location .

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument -^-^—^^^^—^^^^^^—^^^—————————————————-————^——Method CI Time Domain D Frequency Domain

Parameters — On time ___________________________ Frequency —————

— Off time ____________________________ Range ————————

— Delay time.

Integration time.

Power.

Electrode array —

Electrode spacing .

Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIALTn.trumPnt fi/ti 00l' 0 Rangf

Survey'

Corrections made

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument.Values measuredEnergy windows (levels) -^————.^-—..^^-^—-—....^.^————^^———.....^^

Height of instrument______________________________Background Count.Size of detector^^^—^——-—————^—--——^^^^^^——.—^.^^^-^^-—.^^——.—.^^-.^^—

Overburden ——-^^^^^^-—-^^^.^^^—-—.^^-——.—.—^^^^^^^—^^-^—.—-——^.^^——(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey^^^.^^^————^-^^^^^^——^——^^

Instrument —^^^^^^^-——.——.————.——— Accuracy^^-^.^.^——-—^—.——.—.-^^^^-———Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s)——^

Instrument(s) ——————{specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy———.^^——.——-^-^———(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used^—-———^^^—-—^—^——^—.^^—.——-.——.—^.^^^^^^

Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_________________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area___________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled- Horizon Development- Sample Depth^——— Terrain—————————

Drainage Development—^—^————.^— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p. p.m. p.p. b.

Da a

Cu, Pb,

Others_

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)

Field AnalysisExtraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used ——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. —————-—-——

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis____

Extraction Method. Analytical Method -

Reagents Used ——

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method-——

Analytical Method ——Reagents Used^—-——.

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

GeneraL General.

April 9, 1984 Your File: 33 Our File: 2.5978

Robert L.V. Ekstrora l Rolph Road Toronto, Ontario M4G 3M3

Dear Sir:

RK: Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Self Potential) Survey submitted on Mining Claims EO 538210-11 in the Township of Marmara

We have recently received an additional copy of your report, in duplicate, for the above-mentioned survey. The original copies were filed and receipt acknowledged on November 8, 1983. We are therefore returning the enclosed copies to you for your personal record s.

For further information, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at {416)965-6918.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-6918

M.E. Anderson:me

cc: Mining Recorder Toronto, Ontario

Encl.

Your File: Our File:

332.5978

February-j o * 1984.

Robert L. V. Ekstrom l Rolph Road Toronto, Ontario H46 3M3

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Self Potential) survey submitted on Mining Claims EO 538210-11 In the Townshipof Marmora.^^^^^^^m^^^^^^,.^im^^^^^^.^^^.

Enclosed are the plans, In duplicate, for the above mentioned survey. Please Include a key map showing the location of the property with respect to township boundaries on each geophysical map.

Also, we are endeavouring to compile a list of qualifications of those persons who sign reports of geological, geochemical and geophysical surveys submitted to this Ministry for assessment work credits. It would be appreciated therefore, If you would please furnish a brief resume qualifications for our records.

Yours very truly,

- ,

J. R. MortonActing DirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1H3Phone: (416) 965-1380

M. E. Anderson :dg

Ends:

W

cc: Mining Recorder Toronto, Ontario.

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontarioss^^e

GeotechnicalReportApproval

File

Mining Lands Comments

"-'j

To: Geophysics U i/ y ,

Comments

[ ] Wish to see again with corrections

To: Geology - Expenditures

Comments

l l Approved | | Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Geochemistry

Comments

\ l Approved | | Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

j [TO: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block, (Tel: 5-1380)

1593 18 V) O)

1983 11 08

63-33

2.5978

Mrs. R.M. Charnesky Mining Recorder Ministry of Natural Resources Whitney Block, Room 2548 99 Wellesley Street West Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

Dear Madam:

We have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic Self Potential) survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on mining claims EO 538210-11 1n the Township of Marmora.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-1380

A. Barr:me

cc: Robert L.V. Ekstrom l Rolph Road Toronto, Ontario M46 3M3

cc: Dusan Dm1trov1c1888 Christopher Road M1ss1ssauga, Ontario L5J 2L1

C/1

C/l

L/D LO

Lake Twp.(M.110)

v vi vii

Rawdon Twp. (M.I768)

oC\J

Q.

oO

THE TOWNSHIP

OF

MARMORACOUNTY OF

HASTINGS

EASTERN ONTARIO MINING DIVISION

SCALD I-INO^40 CHAINS

LEGENDPATENTED LAND

CROWN LAND SALE

LEASES

LOCATED LAND

LICENSE OF OCCUPATION

ROADS

IMPROVED ROADS KINGS HIGHWAY

RAILWAYS

POWER LINES

MARSH OR MUSKEGMINES

SURFACE RIGHTS ONLYMINING RIGHTS ONLYTRAILS -'-TENTED for SRO

C.S. Loc.L.O

S. R.O.M.R.O,

NOTES

This Map Is Not To Be Used FOR SURVEY PURPOSES,Lot And Concession Lines S^own Here j r Arc Projected From The Best Information Available, But Their True Posit'on Is No. Guaranteed. For Official Survey Purpur.es, Consult The Original Survey Plans ArrjKieldnotes 0^ Record In The Ministry .-;'Natural Resour c es .

400 surface rights reservation along th * --"ores of all lakes and rivers,

withdrawn from staking under Section |

36 of fh- Mininq Act ( R.S.O I 980K ?t

" ^" F l le D ate Dispotitior f

- -. " , 17,. .'81 W - O

PLAN NO. M.122ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

10I/O

3IC05NE001I 2 .5978 MARMORA 200

24W 22W 2OW 18W I6W HW I2W m 8W 4W 2W OD

\ L 1+00 S

L2O100S

CORNER.MARMORA

7 i

4 J.OTS

20 vm H

Lor

S 9 t/'*7 *X -^

Reading in mV.

\

1*440 mV

-f 20

--20

—4O

ACKERMAN GOLD P/fOPf f?TY

Ed5/" /70//7 fof^ concession

Marmora Township,

: D. Dmih~ovic

SELF -POTENT i AL SURVEYScale r*~2ooFeetpr 4OmV,

Date ;

; O C/aitn POST .

2.5973 MARMORA E10

***-^Z:*lp.touns

*y tv^' A'O j\jt*~~ "t *w|H3S

: -pjooo pacn

: dia 9 Ouuoeg

^C-v— ' U : ON e'0H

/— , .j,,-, f ff 7/ -1* : BupBeg

y ^ N ' AoudnbftJ j

9/ "" ^/"-7 * JUBUJIW^SUI

: uiiBjO

: AIBUJOUV

: BSJV

033YOOMitVH 8/BS'g II003NSKOIC

va owavw 'n JN

w .