4tN01NE0ei35 8015 OLSEN 010

REPORT ON AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY

CARRIED OUT BY AERODAT LIMITED

FOR

BUSH PILOT CORPORATION INC.

CLAIM GROUPS

ONTEX MINEX

4t J. SADOWSKI

IN OLSEN TOWNSHIP, SAULT STE. MARIE MINING DISTRICT ONTARIO NTS 41N/1

OCTOBER, 1983

RECEIVEDRECEIVED

MINING UNDS SECTION "W^fyf ARlL 3O

UNOS SfCT)ON

m •3fe The attached report describes an airborne geophysical l^V^'-r "' ' ' }

ft survey carried out by Aerodat Ltd. for Bush Pilot Corp. Inc. during j

^;- the summer of 1983. [':-i : j/."-- - - \iti.: - - i

The resulting work credits are to be applied to three l

(3) groups of claims as follows: ?

: :-- ' ? :ONTEX : (holder) Mid-North Engineering Services [

: Suite 1205, 45 Richmond Street, West t

Toronto, Ontario M5H 1Z2 |

SSM 691950 to 692149 inclusive = 200 claims [:Airborne coverage = 68.98 line-miles [Credit per line-mile (3 surveys) = 1 20 days f'Total credit ^ 8278 days [ Credit per claim = 41.39 days.

MINEX : (holders) Ted and Rick Giroux, Jack Falstrom,Robert Charpentier.

160 Wallace Terrace

Apt. C

Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario

SSM 706313 to 706410 inclusive = 9 8 claims Airborne coverage = 41.43 line-miles Credit per line-mile (3 surveys) = 1 20 days Total credit = 4972 days; Credit per claim ^ 50.73 days.

J. SADOWSKI : (holders) Ted and Rick Giroux,Jack Falstrom, Robert Charpentier

160 Wallace Terrace

Apt. C

Sault Ste. Marie, Ontairo

...12

-2-

SSM 710352 to 710354 710356 to 710485710487 to 710501 Total * 221 claims 710642 to 710676 716513 to 716550

Airborne coverage ^ 6 9.97 line-miles Credit per line-mile (3 surveys) = 1 20 days Total credit = 8396 days Credit per claim = 37.99 days

J.W. CANTGeologistBush Pilot Corp. Inc.27 Apri3 1984

li

REPORT ON

COMBINED HELICOPTER-BORNE

MAGNETIC AND ELECTROMAGNETIC

SURVEY

BATCHAWANA AREA

ONTARIO

for

BUSHPILOT CORPORATION LTD.

by

AERODAT LIMITED

October, 1983

41N01NE0035 0015 OLSEN 010C

1.

2.

3.

5

6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

3.2

3.2.3

3.2.4

3.2.5

3.2.6

3.2.7

3.2.8

Page No.

INTRODUCTION 1-1

SURVEY AREA 2-1

AIRCRAFT AND EQUIPMENT 3-1

3.1 Aircraft ' 3-1

Equipment -3-1

3.2.1 Electromagnetic System 3-1

3.2.2 VLF-EM System 3-1

Magnetometer 3-2

Magnetic Base Station 3-2

Radar Altimeter 3-2

Tracking Camera 3-2

Analog Recorder 3-3

Digital Recorder 3-4

DATA PRESENTATION 4-1

4.1 Base Map and Fl.vght Path Recovery 4-1

4.2 Electromagnetic Profile Maps 4-2

4.3 Magnetic Contour Maps 4-3

4.4 VLF-EM Contour Maps 4-3

INTERPRETATION 5-1

RECOMMENDATIONS 6-1

APPENDIX I - General Interpretive Considerations

APPENDIX II - Detailed Anomaly List

LIST OF MAPS

(Scale: 1:15,000)

1 Interpretation Map

2 Total Field VLF-EM

3 Total Field Magnetic Map

Provided but not included in report:

Master map in 2 colours of electromagnetic profiles

(45.? Hz coaxial and 4175 Hz coplanar)

1-1^^

^ .".'fe l. INTRODUCTION,

* 1 '

This report describes an airborne geophysical survey

carried out on behalf of Bushpilot Corporation Ltd.

by Aerodat Ltd. Equipment operated included a 3

frequency HEM and VLF electromagnetic systems and a

magnetometer. The survey, located near Batchawana,

Ontario was flown during the period of July 30 to

August 9, 1983 and a total of 400 line miles (645 km)

of data was collected.

2-1

2. SURVEY AREA

The index map below outlines the survey area and map

sheet layout. The flight lines were flown at a

nominal spacing of 1/8 mile (approx. 200 meters).

47005'

TWP.

m----

3. AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT

3.1 Aircraft

The helicopter used for the survey was an Aerospatiale

t A-Star 350D owned and operated by North Star Helicopters,

Installation of the geophysical and ancillary equipment

was carried out by Aerodat. The survey aircraft was

flown at a nominal altitude of 60 meters.

3.2 Equipment

3.2.1 Electromagnetic System

9The electromagnetic system was an Aerodat/

Geonics 3 frequency system. Two vertical

coaxial coil pairs were operated at 945 and

4570 Hz and a horizontal coplanar coil pair

at 4175 Hz. The transmitter-receiver separ

ation was 7 meters. In-phase and quadrature

signals were measured simultaneously for the

3 frequencies with a time-constant of 0.1

seconds. The electromagnetic bird was towed

30 meters below the helicopter.

3.2.2 VLF-EM System

IP The VLF-EM System was a Herz 1A. This instru

ment measures the total field and vertical

4:-; fm'.

3-2

jV-V - i'1 --

*f|{ quadrature component of the selected frequency.

^n : Tne sensor was towed in a bird 15 meters below

vl^'i ;- the helicopter. The station used was NAA,

Cutler, Maine, 17.8 kHz.

3.2.3 Magnetometer

The magnetometer was a Geometrics G-803 proton

precession type. The sensitivity of the

instrument was .5 gamma at a 1.0 second sample

rate. The sensor was towed in a bird 15 meters

below the helicopter.

3.2.4 Magnetic Base Station

An IFG proton precession type magnetometer was

operated at the base of operations to record

diurnal variations of the earth's magnetic

field. The clock of the base station was

synchronized with that of the airborne system.

3-3

3.2.5 Radar Altir.eter

A Hoffman HRA-100 radar altimeter was used to

record terrain clearance. The output from the

instrument is a linear function of altitude

for maximum accuracy.

3.2.6 Tracking Camera

A Geocam tracking camera was used to record

flight path on 35 mm film. The camera was

operated in strip mode and the fiducial numbers

for cross reference to the analog and digital

data were imprinted on the margin of the film.

3.2.7 Analog Recorder

A RMS dot-matrix recorder was used to display

the data during the survey. A sample record

with channel identification and scales is

presented on the following page.

*

APPENDIX I

sulphides, and the electromagnetic response only relate

to the minor associated mineralization. Indicated conductance

is also of little direct significance for the identification

of gold mineralization. Although gold is highly conductive

it would not be expected to exist in sufficient quantity

to create a recognizable anomaly, but minor accessory sulphide

mineralization could provide a useful indirect indication.

In summary, the estimated conductance of a conductor can

provide a relatively positive identification of significant

sulphide or graphite mineralization; however, a moderate

to low conductance value does not rule out the possibility

of significant economic mineralization.

Geometrical Considerations

Geometrical information about the geologic conductor can

often be interpreted from the profile shape of the anomaly.

The change in shape is primarily related to the change in

inductive coupling among the transmitter, the target, and

the receiver.

In the case of a thin, steeply dipping, sheet-like conductor,

the coaxial coil pair will yield a near symmetric peak over

the conductor. On the other hand the coplanar coil pair will

pass through a null couple relationship and yield a minimum

over the conductor, flanked by positive side lobes. As the

dip of the conductor decreases from vertical, the coaxial

~ 5 ~ APPENDIX I

anomaly shape changes only slightly, but in the case of

the coplanar coil pair the side lobe on the down dip side

strengthens relative to that on the up dip side.

As the thickness of the conductor increases, induced

current flow across the thickness of the conductor becomes

relatively significant and complete null coupling with the

coplanar coils is no longer possible. As a result, the

apparent minimum of the coplanar response over the conductor

diminishes with increasing thickness, and in the limiting

case of a fully 3 dimensional body or a horizontal layer

or half-space, the minimum disappears completely.

A horizontal conducting layer such as overburden will produce

a response in the coaxial and coplanar coils that is a

function of altitude (and conductivity if not uniform). The

profile shape will be similar in both coil configurations

with an amplitude ratio {coplanar/coaxial) of about 4/1.*

In the case of a spherical conductor, the induced currents

are confined to the volume of the sphere, but not relatively

restricted to any arbitrary plane as in the case of a sheet-

like form. The response of the coplanar coil pai T directly

over the sphere may be up to 8* times greater than that of

the coaxial coil pair.

- 6 - APPENDIX I

In summary a steeply dipping, sheet-like conductor will

display a decrease in the coplanar response coincident

with the peak of the coaxial response. The relative

strength of this coplanar null is related inversely to

the thickness of the conductor; a pronounced null indicates

a relatively thin conductor. The dip of such a conductor

can be inferred from the relative amplitudes of the side-lobes,

Massive conductors that could be approximated by a conducting

sphere will display a simple single peak profile form on both

coaxial and coplanar coils, with a ratio between the coplanar

to coaxial response amplitudes as high as 8.*

Occasionally if the edge of an overburden zone is sharply

defined with some significant depth extent, an edge effect

will occur in the coaxial coils. In the case of a horizontal

conductive ring or ribbon, the coaxial response will consist

of two peaks, one over each edge; whereas the coplanar coil

will yield a single peak.

- 7 - APPENDIX

* It should be noted at this point that Aerodat's definition

of the measured ppm unit is related to the primary field

sensed in the receiving coil without, normalization to the

maximum coupled (coaxial configuration) . If such normal

ization were applied to the Aerodat units, the amplitude

of the coplanar coil pair would be halved.

f- 8 ~ APPENDIX

Magnetics

The Total Field Magnetic Map shows contours of the

total magnetic field, uncorrected for regional varia

tion. Whether an EM anomaly with a magnetic correla

tion is more likely to be caused by a sulphide deposit

than one without depends on the type of mineralization.

An apparent coincidence between an EM and a magnetic

anomaly may be caused by a conductor which is also

magnetic, or by a conductor which lies in close proximity

to a magnetic body. The majority of conductors which are

also magnetic are sulphides containing pyrrhotite and/or

magnetite. Conductive and magnetic bodies in clcse

association can be, and often are, graphite and magnetite.

It is often very difficult to distinguish between these

cases. If the conductor is also magnetic, it will usually

produce an EM anomaly whose general pattern resembles

that of the magnetics. Depending on the magnetic perme

ability of the conducting body, the amplitude of the

inphase EM anomaly will be weakened, and if the conduc

tivity is also weak, the inphase EM anomaly may even be

reversed in sign.

:?TV,.V-, : . : '-"-"* -

- 9 - APPENDIX I

VLF Electroriagn itics

The VLF-EM method employs the radiation from powerful

military radic transmitters as the primary signals.

The magnetic field associated with the primary field

is elliptically polarized in the vicinity of electrical

conductors. The Herz Totem uses three orthogonal coils

to measure the total field and vertical quadrature

component of the polarization ellipse.

The relatively high frequency of VLF 15-25 kHz provides

high response factors for bodies of low conductance.

Relatively "disconnected" sulphide ores have been found

to produce measurable VLF signals. For the same reason,

poor conductors such as sheared contacts, breccia zones,

narrow faults, alteration zones and porous flow tops normally

produce VLF anomalies. The method can therefore be used

effectively for geological mapping. The only relative dis

advantage of the method lies in its sensitivity to conductive

overburden. In conductive ground the depth of exploration

is severely limited.

The effect of strike direction is important in the sense

of the relation of the conductor axis relative to the

energizing electromagnetic field. A conductor aligned

along a radius drawn from a transmitting station will be

- 10 - APPENDIX I

in a maximum coupled orientation and thereby produce a

stronger response than a similar conductor at a different

strike angle. Theoretically it would be possible for a

conductor, oriented tangentially to the transmitter to

produce no signal. The most obvious effect of the strike

angle consideration is that conductors favourably oriented

with respect to the transmitter location and also near

perpendicular to the flight direction are most clearly

rendered and usually dominate the map presentation.

The total field response is an indicator of the existence

and position of a conductivity anomaly. The response will

be a maximum over the conductor, without any special filtering,

and strongly favour the upper edge of the conductor even in

the cast of a relatively shallow dip.

The vertical quadrature component over steeply dipping sheet

like conductor will be a cross-over type response with the

cross-over closely associated with the upper edge of the

conductor.

The response is a cross-over type due to the fact that it

is the vertical rather than total field quadrature component

that is measured. The response shape is due largely to

geometrical rather than conductivity considerations and

the distance between the maximum and minimum on either side

of the cross-over is related to target depth. For a given

target geometry, the larger this distance the greater the

lim9

- 11 - APPENDIX I

depth.

The amplitude of the quadrature response, as opposed

to shape, is a function of target conductance and depth

as well as the conductivity of the overburden and host

rock. As the primary field travels down to the conductor

through conductive material, it is both attenuated and

phase shifted in a negative sense. The secondary field

produced by this altered field at the target also has an

associated phase shift. This phase shift is positive and

is larger for relatively poor conductors. This secondary

field is attenuated and phase shifted in a negative sense

during return travel to the surface. The net effect of

these 3 phase shifts determine the phase of the secondary

field sensed at the receiver.

A relatively poor conductor in resistive ground will yield

a net positive phase shift. A relatively good conductor

in more conductive ground will yield a net negative phase

shift. A combination is possible whereby the net pnase shift

is zero and the response is purely in-phase with no quad

rature component.

A net positive phase shift combined with the geometrical

cross-over shape will lead to a positive quadrature response

on the side of approach and a negative on the side of

departure. A net negative phase shift would produce the

reverse. A further sign reversal occurs with a 180 degree

a!

i- 12 - APPENDIX I

change in instrument orientation as occurs on reciprocal

line headings. During digital processing of the quad

rature data for map presentation this is corrected for

by normalizing the sign to one of the flight line headings.

m- :S-:t:

APPENDIX II

Anomaly List

R:?r

f--.'- 'm

PAGE

CONDUCTOR BIRDFREQUENCY 4570 CTP DEPTH HEIGHT

FLIGHT LINE ANOMALY CATEGORY INPHASE QUAD. MHOS MTRS MTRS

2

2

2t

1300

1310

13201320

A

A

AP '

3

0

00

3.0

5.7

1.60.6

0.5

4.2

3.220.1

B.I

1.2

0.10.0

70

35

310

39

37

3727

1330 4.1 2.6 1.3 48 36

Estimated depth m*v be unreliable because the stronger part of the conductor aau be deeper or to one side of the flight linet or because of a shallow dip or overburden effects.

CAMERA FIDUCIAL *

COPLANAR J^j-PHASE

COAXIAL IN-PHA&E

COAXIAL QUAD.

(LOW FREQ.)t 20 ppm.

l COAXIAI.,N-

(LOW FREQ.) 20 ppm.

n

FIDUCIAL

3-4

.-'il

3.2.8 Digital Recorder

A Perle DAC/NAV data system recorded the survey

data on cassette magnetic tape. Information

recorded was as follows:

Equipment

EM

VLF-EM

magnetometer

altimeter

fiducial (time)

fiducial (manual)

Interval

0.1 second

0.5 second

0.5 second

1.0 second

1.0 second

0.2 second

lifei

\'.W?-F-s

4-1

4. DATA PRESENTATION

Base Map and Flight Path Recovery

The base map, at a scale of 1/15,000 is a

photomosaic assembled from existing aerial

photography.

The flight path was plotted manually and the

fiducials digitized to provide positional

information for subsequent computer processing,

4-2

Electromagnetic Profile Maps

The electromagnetic data was recorded digitally

at a high sample rate of 10/second with a small

time constant of 0.1 second. A two stage digital

filtering process was carried out to reject major

sferic events, and reduce system noise.

Local atmospheric activity can produce sharp, large

amplitude events that cannot be removed by convent

ional filtering procedures. Smoothing or stacking

will reduce their amplitude but leave a broader residual

response that can be confused with a geological phenomenon.

To avoid this possibility, a computer algorithm searches

out and rejects the major "sferic" events.

The signal to noise was further enhanced by the

application of a low pass filter. The filter was

applied digitally. It has zero phase shift which

prevents any lag or peak displacement from occurring

and it suppresses only variation with a wavelength

less than about 0.25 seconds. This low effective time

constant permits maximum profile shape resolution.

Following the filtering processes, a base level

correction was made. The correction applied is a linear

function of time that ensures that the corrected

amplitude of the various inphase and quadrature components

i4-3

is zero when no conductive or permeable source is

present. This filtered and levelled data was then

presented in profile map form.

The in-phase and quadrature responses of the coaxial

4570 Hz and the coplanar 4175 Hz configuration are

presented with flight path as a two colour master

overlay.

4 . 3 Magnetic Contour Maps

The aeromagnetic data was corrected for diurnal

variations by subtraction of the digitally recorded

base station magnetic profile. No correction for

regional variation is applied.

The corrected profile data was interpolated onto a

regular grid at a 2.5 mm interval using a cubic

spline technique. The grid provided the basis for

threading the presented contours at a 10 gamma

interval .

4 . 5 VLF-EM Contour Maps

The VLF-EM signal, was compiled in map form. The

mean response level of the total field signal was

removed and the data was oridded and contoured at

an interval of 2i.

S

K -•:

^ j

. '. ;

5. INTERPRETATION

The electromagnetic profile data was analysed and

those responses typical of bedrock anomalies were

i. . identified. The amplitude of the in-phase and

quadrature components were applied to the phasor

diagram for the vertical half-plane and estimates

of conductance (conductivity X thickness) and depth

were made, based on the high frequency coaxial

response. The results are tabulated in Appendix II

and the conductance level is symbolized on the

4k interpretation map.

As discussed in Appendix I, the conductance can

provide an indication of the nature of the conductor,

a conductance of about 6 mhos or greater is generally

due to electronic conduction in the rock, caused by

conductive sulphide. A conductance of less than 2 mhos

is indicative of electrolytic rather than electronic

conduction and the anomaly source may be conductive

overburden or lake bottom sediments or a shear zone

with little or no conductive mineralization.

Anomalies of similar characteristic have been traced

from line to line and the interpreted conductor axes

indicated. A discussion of their potential signif

icance, by area and reference number, follows.

•f:\ W 5 . 2

mj Ontario Department of Mines map 2108 indicates

the southern part of the survey area to be

i covered by a metavolcanic/metasedimentary formation

l with east/west trending bands of diabase or gabbro.

Across the central part of block one, through

! Quintet Lakes, metasediments are noted and in the

northern corner of the block basic intrusive

' rocks have been mapped.

; The aeromagnetic data is generally compatible with

this description. The western end and southern

' portion of sheet l has a complex magnetic pattern

l^P of moderate relief. The magnetic trends are

dominantly near east/west and are typical of meta-

volcanic rocks.

North of this southern zone is an area of low

magnetic activity, typical of meta&edimentary rocks.

i An exception is an intense magnetic band extending

i eastward from Quintet Lakes. It may reflect more\\ basic volcanic rocks or iron formation. The higher

( amplitude magnetic comrd.ex north of Quintet Lake is

; compatible with the mapped basic intrusive complex.f :

i tj Dykes, characterised by linear magnetic anomalies

l are noted throughout the area, generally striking

d in a NW/SE direction.

.-A 'i

s-

\9:-

I m

5-3

1) A NW/SE trending sequence of conductors with

the indicated conductance occasionally in

excess of 30 mhos. Graphite or sulphide

mineralization in to be expected. The axes

are closely associated with a NW/SE trending

magnetic zone that is characteristic of meta-

volcanic rocks.

2) An east/west trending conductor on the flank

of a strong magnetic anomaly. The higher

conductance is typical of graphite or sulphide

mineralization. The magnetic anomaly is very

intense and may be indicative of iron formation.

3) Similar to 2, but of lower apparent conductance.

The in-phase response for both axes 2 and 3

are often visibly affected by the magnetic

permeability ot" the associated magnetic anomaly.

The reduction of the in-phase component will

result in an underestimation of conductance.

Graphite or sulphide mineralization is the

expected anomaly source.

4) These isolated anomalies are of low conductance

and relatively short strike length. They fall

within an area interpreted to be metavolca^iic

rock. Their origin may be electrolytic

5 -

conduction in faults or shears or minor sulphide

or graphite mineralization. Those with the most

promise of sulphide mineralization are 1600A,

1550C, 1080D and in the vicinity of 1520D. The

indicated conductance of 1500B is overestimated;

a result of the inaccuracy of conductance calcu

lation with low signal amplitudes.

5) This conductor axis follows the interpreted

contact between metasedimentary and metavolcanic

rocks. The conductance is generally lowi

suggestive of an electrolytic source or possibly

minor graphite or sulphide mineralization.

Higher conductance exceptions that warrant

added consideration are noted at 1380A, 1230B

and 1090A.

6) These conductor axes strike in an east/west

direction parallel to and just north of axis 5.

They fall within an area of interpreted meta

sedimentary origin. Weak magnetic association

is occasionally noted and may indicate inclusions

of other than metasedimentary rock. The con

ductance is usually low, typical of an electro

lytic source or minor sulphide or graphite

mineralization. Higher conductance exceptions

that warrant added consideration are between

lines 1400 and 1480, and 1240B.

5-5

7) These conductors are associated with the

interpreted basic volcanic or iron formation

unit. The conductance level is usually low

typical of electrolytic conduction in faults

or shears but minor graphite or sulphide

mineralization may be present. Sulphides are

most probable in the vicinity of the higher

conductance responses; 1340A and 1300A.

6 -

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

The airborne geophysical survey has identified a number

of conductors within the area and as noted, many are -

believed to be due to sulphide or graphite mineralization.

As discussed in Appendix I, higher conductance responses

should be favoured for base metal exploration; however,

for gold a low conductance due to minor sulphide mineral

ization or even electrolytic conduction in a fault or

shear may serve as an indirect indication of a favourable

zone.

The survey area is geologically favourable to both gold

and base metal mineralization and hence all of the identi

fied conductors deserve consideration for groun l follow-up,

It is recommended that assignment of follow-up priority

be made by those most familiar with the detailed geology

of the area, who can best recognize the potential signif

icance of the various geophysical anomalies.

Respectfully submi

October 21, 1983 R. L. Scott Hogg

l 'M

APPENDIX I

GENERAL INTERPRETIVE CONSIDERATIONS

Electromagnetic

The Aerodat 3 frequency system utilizes 2 different

transmitter-receiver coil geometries. The traditional

coaxial coil configuration is operated at 2 widely

separated frequencies and the horizontal coplanar coil

pair is operated at a frequency approximately aligned

with the higher frequency.

The electromagnetic response measured by the helicopter

system is a function of the "electrical" and "geometrical"

properties of the conductor. The "electrical" property

of a conductor is determined largely by its conductivity

and its size and shape; the "geometrical" property of the

response is largely a function of the conductors shape and

orientation with respect to the measuring transmitter and

receiver.

Electrical Considerations

For a given conductive body the measure of its conductivity

or conductance is closely related to the measured phase

shift between the received and transmitted electromagnetic

field. A small phase shift indicates a relatively high

conductance, a large phase shift lower conductance. A

small phase shift results in a large in-phase to quadrature

- 2 - APPENDIX I

ratio and a large phase shift a low ratio. This relation

ship is shown quantitatively for a vertical half-plane

model on the phnsor diagram. Other physical models will

show the same trend but different quantitative relation

ships.

The conductance and depth values as determined are correct

only as far as the model approximates the real geological

situation. The actual geological source may be of limited

length, have significant dip, its conductivity and thickness

may vary with depth and/or strike and adjacent bodies and

overburden may have modified the response. In general the

conductance estimate is less affected by these limitations

than the depth estimate but both should be considered a

relative rather than absolute guide to the anomalies

properties.

AEROCAT HEM SYSTEM RESPONSE

VERTICAL HALF-PLANE

tt* :'te'Z.i'tp (fei:i* *i-

- 3 - APPENDIX I

Conductance in mhos is the reciprocal of resistance in

ohms and in the case of narrow slab-like bodies is the

product of electrical conductivity and thickness.

Most overburden will have an indicated conductance of less

than 2 mhos; however, more conductive clays may have an

apparent conductance of say 2 to 4 mhos. Also in the low

conductance range will be electrolytic conductors in

faults and shears.

The higher ranges of conductance, greater than 4 mhos,

indicate that a significant fraction of the electrical

conduction is electronic rather than electrolytic in

nature. Materials that conduct electronically are limited

to certain metallic sulphides and to graphite. High

conductance anomalies, roughly 10 mhos or greater, are

generally limited to sulphide or graphite bearing rocks.

Sulphide minerals with the exception of sphalerite, cinnabar

and stibnite are good conductors; however, they may occur

in a disseminated manner that inhibits electrical conduction

through the rock mass. In this case the apparent conductance

can seriously underrate the quality of the conductor in

geological terms. In a similar sense the relatively non

conducting sulphide minerals noted above may be present in

significant concentration in association with minor conductive

ffiGC

FLIGHT

333

3

333

4

44''

44

f*

444

4.}/.

f.j? :

41

4tjit

f

f

LINE ANOMALY

133013301330

1340

136013601360

1371

138013801380

13901390

14001400

141014101410

14201420J 4 20

143014301430

144C-1440

1450145014501450

14601460

hCI-

A

ABC

A

f;*C

Al

ftF

filC

APr

t,Fr

fl.

fi

fcJ!

r

Af '

CATEGORY

0* o 1

0

2

C00

0

600

00

14

011

010

11-

c10100

2*)

FREQUENCY 4570 INPHASE QUAH.

4. y9.92.7

3.1

1.79.8-0.6

3.7

12. 44.40.2

5.74.1

7.64.9

6.110.98.4

9.09.9

-C. 6

25.412.05. c

6.111.3

5.515.55.25.5

15.717.8

6.815.48.6

0.6

4.720.36. y

2.8

0.64.93.6

3.92.6

2.80.5

3.96.64.8

7.55.23 "'

14.97.21.8

7.15.4

3.19.15.8

14.1

d. 26.3

CONI'UCIOK MR! CTP IiEr'lH HEIGtn

HHOS MTRS HTKK

0.40.50.1

6.6

0.0 0.20.0

1.0

68.40.60.0

1.31.3

3.6IB. 9

1.52.02.0

1.22.40.0

2.92.13.9

0.62.9

1.52.40.6o.:

1.25.0

281514

79

17140

28

4621H

1446

3922

363747

31170

203444

1413

27147 216

2016

2D2728

2P

3721It

54

224518

5937

3671

372320

274732

252540

4?50

4S403C-21

2*.

3V

1470 H. 4.3 26 3 E

Estimated depth MAW be unreliable because the stronger part of the conductor cuv be deeper or to one side of the fliflhl line* or because of a shallow dip or overburden effects.

PAGE

1ST Ife FLIGHT LINE ANOMALY CATEGORYFREQUENCY 4570 INPHASE QUAIi.

CONDUCTOR BIRI*CTP Di-PTH HEIGHT

MHOS KTRS HTRS

A

4444

444444

44A444

4A4A444A

AA444A

AAAAAA

14.80

1490149014901490

150015001500150015001500

151015101510151015101510

15201520152015201520152015201520

153015301530153015301530

154015401540154015401540

A

ABCD

ABCDEF

AFICrEF

APCPEFGK

A*CPEF

APCPEF

1

0101

056201

121012

00t*.10345

001010

000000

10.6

12. b22.73.7

12.8

3.42.14.08.97.012.6

4.69.57.07. B

15.824.9

3. B11.42.617.3B. 3

11.25.13.3

5.93.8

14.87.4

1J.46.5

4.5TP. 7A. 72.72.34.3

5.8

B. 411.32.47.9

2.30.0

-0.12.24.95.7

l.B2.72.45.4

10.010.5

2.79.90.68.17.02.20.60.2

3.22.96.5/.;4.57.9

5.44.78.11.41.62.5

2.3

1.93.41.22.1

1.142.8

124.16.61.43.2

2.85.63.91.52.24.4

1.11.24.93.41.19.7

15,734.8

1.9l.C3.50.93.80.6

0.51.00.61.50.91.5

15

37265327

558473504021

483734401928

4335752234526081

436014133136

362131827549

47

IB223330

334329232739

403443253321

4017383126163227

342144463319

274624192535

1550 15.3 3.6 8.4 35 26

Estimated depth **y be unreliable because the stronger part of the conductor nay be deeper or to one side of the fliflht line* or because of a shallow dip or overburden effects.

PAGE

FREQUENCY 4S70 FLIGHT LINE ANOMALY CATEGORY INPHASE QUAD,

CONDUCTOR BIRD CTP DEPTH HEIGHT

HHOS HTRS MTRS

4A

444

44

44

44444

4444

444f,

44444

44 '

4444

555

15501550

156015601560

15701570

15801580

15901590159015901590

1600160016001600

1610161016101610

16201620162016201620

163016301630163016301630

164016401640

BC

A6C

AP

AB

ABCDE

AB

. CD

ABCD

ABCDE

ABCDEF

AB '

C

02

030

11

00

21000

1010

3002

00 "1A.

53

024000

003

4.410.6

2.67.74.8

4.3B. 9

3.44,7

15.310.77.73.35.2

6.88.17.35.6

9.81.02.54.6

7.07.810.53.6

10.9

5.915.440.06.92.55.2

-0.13.2

11.5

2,63.2

1.71.13.4

2.04.7

3.72.6

3.64.85.85.23.3

2.55.72.93.3

2.10.81.61.4

10.84.83.80.21.6

6.45.36. B4.33.24.3

2.93.61.7

1.55,3

1.013.51.2

2.12.3

0.51.7

7.83.11.30,31.4

3.51.'

3.21.6

8.30,51.04.0

0.41.84.1

40.214.4

0.75.0

17.21.60.31.0

0.00.5

14.5

2044

434333

3520

3146

424445344 'J

48203745

33875033

3130286124

73225294053

03439

6323

553644

5346

4237

1921162732

, 29443732

38414957

1638384446

532719413618

413930

Estimated depth nay be unreliable because the stronger part of the conductor aaw bt deeper or to one side of the flight liner or because of a shallow dip or overburden effects.

FLIGHTFREQUENCY 4570

LINE ANOMALY CATEGORY INPHASE QUAD,

PAGE

CONDUCTOR BIR1' CTP DEPTH HEIGHT

MHOS hTRS MTRS

55

555

55

5555

55555

55

555

5

5

5

5

S5

16401640

165016501650

16601660

1670167016701670

16801680168016801680

16901690

170017001700

1710

1760

1770

1780

17901790

DE

ABC

AB

ABCD

ABCDE

AB

ABC

A

A

A

0

AB

22

301

22

0220

03002

00

000

0

0

1

0

00

sS.O6.2

13.92.35.0

38.411.3

2.312.424.61.2

10,646.81.51.4

18.2

2.05.6

5.62.83.8

4.7

10.3

11.0

6.2

6.35.1

1,41.4

2.62.82.2

13.82.8

1.64.17.11.4

9.914.22.62.96.1

2.23.1

4.25.24;0

4.9

8.4

6.5

5.4

6.27.7

4.66.7

10.10.42.4

6.37.1

0,94.97.30.3

1.18.30.10.15.5

0.41.8

1.20.20.6

0.7

1.3

2.1

1.0

0,80.4

5542

234846

1415

60281670

2820292320

4522

3067

0

23

16

31

3926

3341

413138

2852

40363432

2520474735

4256

415264

68

33

44

31

2227

Estimated depth may be unreliable because the stronger part of the conductor nay be deeper or to one side of the flight line* or because of a shallow cijp or overburden effects.

ifWrirfc* V'-^U-v ~'-*5g?#-AfS*rS;,.——

pil^-ftfK

liilt?!--;; 41N01NE8035 eel5 OLSEN

*i-K Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

900

File No

Bl,;-::--TYPE OF SURVEY GEOPHYSICAL

- GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

31 "to.t

f

?r- ^

m mi

Signature of Assessor

Date

DA

VIE

AU

X

TWF?

Mirostryol Order of the Minister

""In the matter of m ining claims:

s-'

The Mining Act

Room 6450. WMnf y B'ock. Quetn'i fVV Toronto. OntarioM7A ma416/96S-1380

SSM 706313 to 410 inclusive

On consideration of an application from the recorded holder S ee attached schedule

under Section 77 Subsection 22 of The Mining Act. l hereby order that the time for filing reports and plans in support of

.JLLri3Qine-J3eQph.y.sical_LE .Jyi,., Ma.gne.tQiriatiQtssA-nX^Jiit^corded on February 3. 19- be extended until and including_____April 30 , 19 84 .

Copi*t:

Data

Richard GirouxEdward GirouxJack Falstrom160 Wallace TerraceApt CSault Ste. Marie

Mining RecorderSault Ste. Marie, Ontario

ftLe

Siignatura of Oitaclor. Lend Mantpcmant Branch

SCHEDULE A.

Richard Giroux160 Wallace Terrace Apt. CSault Ste. Marie, Ontario

Prosp. Lie. No. D-18346

Claims : 706313 to 706360

Edward Giroux Prosp. Lie. No. D-18373 c/o 160 Wallace Terrace Apt. C. Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario

Claims: 706361 to 706385

Jack Falstrom Prosp. Lie. No. D-18374 c/o 160 Wallace Terrace, Apt. C. Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario

Claims: 706386 to 706410

rfj^v M'nistryof Technical AssessrVyl Natural llf . . .. m IVJ Resources WQrk CreditsOntario tifc

nent

0*tt Mini

1984 08 02 Wor

Fit* 2.6682

no Rtcordw'i Riuprt ol *No. 36-84

Recorded Holder

MID-NORTH ENGINEERING SERVICES IN TRUSTTownship or Area

OLSEN TOWNSHIP

Type o) survey and number ol At*e*tmenl dayt credit per claim

Geophysical 18

18

|nrti,G*r) polarization . rlayl

VLF is H

Section 77 (19) S*t "Mining Cltimi AttMMO" column

Man days LJ Airborne 13

Special provision D Ground D

D Credits have been reduced because ol partial

coverage of claims.

C~l Credits have been reduced because of corrections

to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claim* AtMiMd

SSM 691950 to 958 inclusive 691974-975 691979 to 982 inclusive 691984 to 692049 inclusive 692053 to 055 inclusive 692058 to 061 inclusive 692063 to 099 inclusive 692122 to 127 inclusive 692130 to 149 inclusive

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

Li not sufficiently covered by the survey 1 - 1 Inefficient technical data lilfd

SSM 691959 to 973 inclusive 691976 to 978 inclusive 691983 692050 to 052 inclusive 692056-057 692062 692100 to 121 inclusive 692128-129

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on ajch claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows- Geophysical 80: Geological 40; (isochemical 40: Section 77 n9) flo

iT 5\ Ministry ot Technical AssessrW 1 Natural . a, . . ... Ol/ Resources Work CreditsDntario 4^

nent

Date Mini

1984 08 02 Wor

Fill

2.6682X*~"1OT410'

Recorded HolderTED GIROUX/RICK GIROUX/JACK FALLSTROM

Township or AreaOLSEN TOWNSHIP

Type ol survey and number ol Assessment day* credit per claim

Geophysical 18

18

Ra^'Amofnf , rtayi

VLF 18 ^

Section 77 (19) See "Mininj Cliimi AiiMMd" column

Geochpmirai rt'v 1

Man days Lj Airborne DI

Special provision d Ground D

[~! Credits have been reduced because of partial

coverage of claims.

l~l Credits have been reduced because of corrections

to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

SSM 710353 710356 to 361 inclusive 710364 to 371 inclusive 710375 to 381 inclusive 710385 to 390 inclusive 710396 710414 to 451 inclusive 710453 to 485 inclusive 710487 to 489 inclusive 710498 710501 710642 to 676 inclusive

716513 to 520 inclusive 716527 to 533 inclusive

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

Mo credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

not sufficiently covered by the survey

SSM 710352 710354 710362-363710372 to 374 inclusive 710382 to 384 inclusive 710391 to 395 inclusive 710397 to 399 inclusive 710400 to 413 inclusive 710452

LJ Insufficient technical data filed

SSM 710490 to 497 inclusive 710499-500716521 to 526 inclusive 716534 to 550 inclusive

r he Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number ol approved assessment days recorded on ach claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows Geoohysical 60; Geological 40: Geochemical 40: Section 77ii9) 60

Mirosfryof GeotechnicalNatural D^^^^*Resales RePQrt ,A Approval-^^?

3-66X2

Mining Lands Comments

To: Geophysics

Comments

Signature Approved LJ Wish I o *se again with corrections

l To: Geology - Expenditures

Comments

~Dat"e~ Signature [~] Approved Fj Wish lo see again with corrections

l To: Geochemistry

Comrr.enis

Approved Q W ish to lee again with correctionsSignature

j JTo: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block, (Tel: 5-1380)

n'sir/of . R eport o f Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures) /O //^'-'^ f\

Mining ActTyp* of Survtyisl

Instructions - Pleaie type rr pnntH number of mimng claims traversednceetit *p.ir* on this form, attach a list

Note - Only riflys crerMt calculated in the"E "pcnditures" section may be 'niered

i in the "Eipend Days Cr." columns~~Oj - Do not use shaded areas below ^^^^

__ _ _ Aijrbornc Geophysical SurveyClaim Hoid'erll)

Richard Giroux, Edward Giroux, Jack Falstrom

Pt^'P or Art*

OLSEN

Address

Schedule A.

See Attached Schedule A.Survey Company Dal* of Survey ifrom A, [total Mfies of hne~Cut

30 .07 83 l 09 08 83 l N/ADay j Mo. j Vr. | Day j Mo, | Vr. J

Aerodat LimitedNama and Address of Author lof Gto-Technical raport)

____ R.L.S. Hogg, Aerodat Ltd. 3883 Nashua Drive, Mississauga, Ontario LAV 1R3Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provsions

For lint turirey.

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey; using the same grid-

Enter 20 days (for eachl

jVMan Days

^mm*m* j3 E C E i V E |

FFB - o 1984Ut. p'iSiOiipiiid^ij^g^jd

Airborne C'lA'ti

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

41.43 line-miles

Geophysica

- Electromagnetic

in S~- r" * * 'f^ 'Magnetometer

- Radiorrietnc

.B^'i U '^

INlWUNUb iG*ochemic*l

Geopnyiicat

k

M.l*

- Etecirom*gn*t*c

- Maflnatorneter

- Radiometric

- Other

oiogical

Gtochemica!

EltctrortAagneiic

M*ign*tomQter

Radiometric VLF"E^

Oayi p*rClaim

AM

,c^ i r^

Dayi ptrClaim

———

Oavi p*rClaim

16.91

16.91

16,91

,'

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Tvpa of Work Performed

Performed on Claimts)

— -. ——

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits Total

Total Expenditures Days Credits

Mining CU'mPrafix

SSM

Number

706313

.JJ16.31A.... 706315

J0.6.3J6 ,

706317

706318

..7.0.^319. .,.....70.6.320 .

-.706121^..^

7.06322 .

.706.323.....

706324

.-7063.25.

-706326 ..

..7.06322 .-.-

-7J56328. .... ....

..7.06329. . .

-706330

706331 .....

-706332 -..

.706333

-706334

706335

Expnntt Days C'

::;;

— -- -

Mining Claim Pxfn F Numba'

SSM

'

1

706336

706337

706338

706339

706340

(706341

706342

7063.43......

.J-063.44.

-.70634.5

..7063.46.

^.7.06342.

706348

-706349 ....

- 706350 .....

-.706351......

.706352 . ..

-706353

.706354 -.

-706355 . ...

- 706356

-706357

.706118

G *pend. Days C'.

— — ——

- —————

—— — ——

•- ————

-—— ——

. . . ___

15 *

InstructionsTool Days Credits may b* apportioned At the claim holder'schoice. Enter number of day* credits per claim selectedin columns at right. ^ /~\

See Schedule B For

Remaining Claims

Totil number o f m ining CUimi covo'ecl hy ihtj report of work

02*February 1984Certification Verifying Reporfof Work

l hereby certify that l hay* a jwrional and intimate knowledge of the facli set forth in the Report of Work annocd or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report ii true.

o. having p*;i *:(j t he work

Name arid Postal Addresi of Parson Certifying

-John.. Sadowski...Bush-Pilot .Corporation Inc. 49 UaLLin.gtaa-Str.ctit-~ [hate CeTtilietl

Toronto, Ontario

sL-S.La^J2QL/

11,

SCHEDULE A.

Richard Giroux160 Wallace Terrace Apt. CSault Ste. Marie, Ontario

Prosp. Lie. No. D-183A6

Claims : 706313 to 706360

Edward Giroux Prosp. Lie. No. D-18373 c/o 160 Wallace Terrace Apt. C. Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario

Claims: 706361 to 706385

Jack Falstrom Prosp. Lie. No. D-18374 c/o 160 Wallace Terrace, Apt. C. Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario

Claims: V06386 to 706410

SCHEDULE B.

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED (con't.)

MINING CLAIM

PREFIX NUMBER

SSM 706359706360706361706362706363700364706365706366706367706368706369706370706371706372706373706374706375706376706377706378706379706380706381706382706383706384706385706386

MINING CLAIM

PREFIX NUMBER

SSM 706387706388706389706390706391706392706393706394706395706396706397706398706399706400706401706402706403706404706405706406706407706408706409706410

-

f ,

Ontario

Ministryof Report of WorkNaluciU. ,-. , - . ,Resources (Geophysical. Geological.

*. Geochemical and Expcmlitiiics)

, l \,f\ :. t I nstructions - Pli-Mp typr or puntIt - H n umbri of mining claims travrisnl

nrrrds space on this form, attach a list./X O ") N ote: - Only days drilits calculated in ttir ^P\^ * *~ "Expenditures" section may he rnlriril

m the "E upend Days Cr." columns Mining Act - Do noi uie shadw l areas below.

typt o' Survayltl

Airborne^ Geophysical.Survey OLSEN

-Aejod.at.. Lim i ted.batt" of Survey (from 4 to)

0;7.J 83. j.Oft jNam* and Address of Author (o* Gee-Technical report)

R.L.S. HogR, Aerodat Ltd., 3883 Nashua DrivCj Mississauga, Ontario LAV 1R3

1 Total Miles of Ime Cut

..N/A......

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right

Initr ucuoni^ot*i Day* Oedits rnay ba apportiontd at the claim cho'-t- Enur numbef o^ clay* cfcdttt in column^ at right.

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)____Special Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This inclydw line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 deys (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse sidenrtAJiit i li "iH — r ————

p E C T TV

r F B 8 WA.M.

Airborne Cradiis

Note Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

68.98 Line-miles

- Mugnetomettf

- Other

Gcoiogicil

Geochemical

Gsophyrcel

S ff- Ra

. Oti

jntlonictar

ar

al

Elec.rornagnelic

Magnetometar

P ——,wk VLF-E^

Dflyi p*rClaim

—— ———

Day. ptrCuim

'EDa yi p*f

Claim

13.80

13.80

13.80Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Typ* of Work Performed

Performed on CiaimrtT '

Calculation of ElU^lt^N'&^L&l'^i^^'1 *

Total tooendisuras

)LtlIL-i- T OIJ|Dnys Crcd'U

Mining C'iim "prelii" ~Nun^b*V ""

SSM j 691950

: 691951

.6919,52 .

691953

.691955....... .

691957

...6.919.5.8. .

...69195.9.—..-[. 691960.... .

.69.1961--.-...

.691962.......

.691963.......

69136.4

.691965- -

.691966--...

L 691967-.---

L.691.968. -.

1.69-1969..,..

. 691.970... .1 691971

691972

Days Cr

- ——— -

——————

— . — —

. .- ——

.............

-

Mining C'aim. .. — .. . T .-..*. . . . . .. . .. .PitTiit i Number

SSM ; 691973

i 6^1974

; 691975

i 691976

691977

i 691978

.^91979

; 691980

' 6 91981

u 691982

!. 691983:'...

r ...6 9 19.84... .^

, .691.985.......

, 691986

u- 69198a ..

1-69.1989.......

i.. . 69 1990..—.

L 691991

! 691992 ^

i. 691993^

i 69199A^ j .

- . .. .— 6a^9s Y

E K pond. Ours Cr.

- - - - -

.—— -.--

Z*S .

WirtZt.

wbmt

See Schedule B for Remaining Claims

TO)*' numb^of m mmg | cJaimt eoytfred by i h 'i l'*DO't O'WO'k. l '

-\/

.06 Feb 84 ,. , —,__t Certification Verifying Report pf Work

-••' "- -——————————-'- —-*———*t " •"•y—————-—————————"—————————————-————————-——————————————————-————————-—————————————————————————————————————————-

l hereby certify that l havt'TTpenonal and intimate knowledge of the (act* lei lorih m the R*POM of VVo'V, annexed hereto, having pt-rfo/mf or witnessed jsme during and/or after its completion and the annexed repo't it i*ue.

Name arid Postal Addrau of Person Certifying

John H. Sadowski., Bush Pilot Corporation Inc. jij9 Wellington Street East Ste. ^201Date Ce't'fied

Ontario M5E 1C9 06 Feb..

Al);;.;, 136J (81/fi) 35*1

SCHEDULE B.

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED (Cont'ed)

MINING CLAIM

PREFIX NUMBER PREFIX NUMBER

SSM 691996691997691998 691999^692000692001692002692003692004692005692006692007692008692009692010692011692012692013692014692015692016692017692018692019692020692021692022692023692024692025692026692027692028692029692030692031692032692033692034692035692036692037

SSM 692038692039692040692041692042 69204'692044692045692046692047692048692049 69205'J 692031692052692053692054692055692056692057692058692059692060692061692062692063692064692065692066692067692068692069692070692071692072692073692074692075692076692077692078692079692080

l SCHEDULE B.

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED (Cont'ed)

MINING CLAIM

PREFIX

SSM

NUMBER

692081692082692083692084692085692086692087692088692089692090692091692092692093692094692095692096692097692098 692099"'692100692101692102 "692103692104692105692106692107692108692109692110692111692112692113692114692115692116692117692118 6-m 19692120692121692122

PREFIX

SSM

NUMBER

692123692124692125692126692127692128692129692130692131692132692133692134692135692136692137692138692139692140692141692142692143692144692145692145692147692148692149

Ontario

Minisiryof R eport of WorkNatural ,-, , . , - , . , 'Resojjrces (Geophysical, Geological, ^

Geochemical and Expenditures)

/37-,-/-V/.tcy

Min/fig Aril

A 'nstructions: Plejif typo or purl \/-If number of nvnmg rlaimt traversed

eicerds spare on this form, attach t l ist. 7 Note: - Only days credits calculated in ihe ' "Eapenditures" section may he entered

in the "Eipend, Days Cr." columns.- Oo not us* shaded irejs below

Tyot of Surviyli)

AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYClaim Holder (TP

TotvnihiO o r Area

OLSEjJ _Pr"bTpicfor'("Licence TJo

Ted Giroux, Rick Giroux^ and ^ack Falls^romAddress

See Attached Schedule ASurvey Compj n y Date of Survey ( from S, l o) ffotal M iies'of l ine Cut

N/AAerodat Limited - , . ... - ...... .Name and Address of Author ( cf Geo-Technieal report)

R.L.S. Hogg, Aerodat Ltd. 3883 Nashua Drive, Mississauga, Ontario L4V 1R3Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For lint survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Oayt

Complete reverse sjfje—, , . ind enter (tjt*i[t) 'Jy,' il l ^

MAY 1 4u ,,,, , v^

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credi.. do not aps-ly to Airborne Surveys.

J9.97 Line-miles

Geophysical

* E lectromagnetic

1 - Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

r" 'jEifeclromagnetlc

. Magnetometer

l^^^ Radiometric

OiA-i l"''Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Days perClaim

———.-...-.

Days perClaim

__ ___

——— ....-.

Days pei Claim

12.66

12.66

12. 6 ',

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type O* Work Performed

Pertormed on Cl.imt.)

Calculation of Expenditure t

Total Expenditures

J^-E f- "P f"*/ ' : f^-

1AM..

'S H

-LAY -21984 . p-^j.

- 1 5 z iInstructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holdir's choice. Enter number of dayv credits per claim selected in columns it right.

NPrefix

SSM

•.v/:.:

riming C'fliniNumhff

710352710353

^710^354 __ 710356710357710358710359710360710361

^710362^ 710363

—7JJ?.3i!,..-. 710365710366

..2iOJ6J—... ^.7JJi3.6JL-

710369...7103.7.0..—

710371710372

- 710 37 3 710374

\710375

Expend.Day* Cr,

- — - ——

- _________

—— —— -

- - ——

.-— —

NPrelx

SSM

;

dming CUimj Numb*'

710376710377

- 11P.3 ?A. 710379710380710381710382710383710384

.-710.385...

...7.10.33-6..... ^7103.81 ^ . .710388

710389710390 710391 710392710393 710394710395

J710396710397 J - - - ••-••••/?*

\71039^x ^

E *ptnd.Oayl C'.

——————

E- ——

— -— —

y^XX/

1^

Con't. Schedule B (a.b.c. pages)

Total n umbei claimsreport G , '

J

Den

30 Agril 84Recor

Certification Verifying Report of Work

For Office Use Only rotai bavs C". B

l hereby certify that l have 3 personal and intimate knowledge of the facts jet forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work Or witnessed tame during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Parson Certifying

tet East Suite 201;:TORONTO, Ontario MSB 109 Data Co,tided

30 April 84|1301 (01/91

SCHEDULE B.

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED (con't.)

MINING CLAIM

PREFIX NUMBER

SSM 710399

710400

710401^

710402

710403

710404

710405

710406

710407

710408

710409

710410

710411

710412

710413

710414

710415

710416

710417

710418

710419

710420

710421

710422

710423

73.0424

710425

710426

710427

710428

\710429

MINING CLAIM

PREFIX NUMBER

SSM 710430

710431

710432

710433

710434

710435

710436

710437

710438

710439

710440

710441

710442

710443

710444

710445

710446

710447

710448

\710449

710450

71045jLv/

710452

710453

710454

710455

710456

710457

710458

710459

X7104CO

SCHEDULE B.

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED

MINING CLAIM

PREFIX NUMBER

SSM 710461

710462

710463

710464

710465

710466

710467

710468

710469

710470

710471

710472

710473

710474

710475

710476

710477

710478

710479

71048G

710481

710482

710483

710484

^JTJJHSS^..

710487

710488

710489

710490

710491

\710492

(con 't.)

MINING CLAIM

PREFIX NUMBER

SSM 710493

710494

710495

710496

710497

710498

710499

710500

\710501

710641

710643

710644

710645

710646

710647

710648

710649

710650

710651

710652

710653

710654

710655

710656

710657

710658

710659

710660

710661

710662

^710663

SCHEDULE B.

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED

MINING CLAIM

PREFIX NUMBER

SSM 710664

710665

710666

710667

710668

710669

710670

710671

710672

710673

710674

710675

\710676

716513

7.16514

716515

716516

716517

716518

716519

716520

716521

716522

716523

716524

716525

716526

716527

716528

716529

X 716530

(con't. )

MINING CLAIM

PREFIX NUMBER

SSM 716531

716532

716533

716534

716535

716536

716537

716538

716539

716540

716541

716542

716543

716544

716545

716546

716547

716548

716549 .

\716550 '

y .

S&'K^

tt. rt

Cs&K

2

jo fc

O L

Ministry of •Natural Resources

Ontario

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports

1984 08 02

2.6682/137-84 Atf-^

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

Ministry oJ NaturalResources

Jntario

REGISTERED

April 16, 1984

Richard Giroux160 Wallace Terrace Apt C ;Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario ' W/fco^fiP6C 1K4

Dear Sir:

Enclosed is a copy of a Report of Work for Airborne Magnetometer, VLF, and Electromagnetic assessment work credits that was recorded by the recorder on February 3, 1984 on Mining Claims SSM 706313 et al in the Township of Olsen.

We have no record that you provided the full reports and maps to the Minister within the sixty day period provided by Section 77 of the Mining Act.

Unless you can provide evidence by April 26, 1984 that the reports and maps were submitted as required, the mining recorder will be directed to cancel the work credits recorded on February 3, 1984.

Yours sincerely,

s^ Director

Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-6918

A. Barr:mc

cc: Edward Girouxc/o 160 Wallace Terrace Apartment CSault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6C 1K4

cc: Jack Falstromc/o 160 Wallace Terrace Apartment CSault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6C 1K4

fe.v'-"-' r^-Vr-S^--

REGISTERED

April 16, 1984

Richard Glroux 160 Wallace Terrace Apt 6 Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6C 1W

Dear Sir:

Enclosed 1s a copy of a Report of Work for Airborne Magnetometer, VLF, and Electromagnetic assessment work credits that was recorded by the recorder on February 3. 1984 on Mining Claims SSM 706313 et al 1n the Township of Olsen.

We have no record that you provided the full reports and maps to the Minister within the sixty day period provided by Section 77 of the Mining Act.

Unless you can provide evidence by April 26, 1984 that the reports and naps were submitted as required, the mining recorder will be directed to cancel the work credits recorded on February 3, 1984.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-6918

A. Barnmc

cc: Edward Glrouxc/o 160 Wallace Terrace Apartment CSault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6C 1K4

cc: Jack Falstromc/o 160 Wallace Terrace Apartment CSault Ste. Marie, OnUrlo P6C l M

a.'

lREGISTERED

April 16, 1984

Mid-North Engineering ServicesSuite 120545 Richmond Street WestToronto, OntarioM5H 1Z2

Dear Sir:

Enclosed 1s a copy of a Report of Work for Airborne Magnetometer, VLF, and Electromagnetic assessment work credits that was recorded by the recorder on February 8, 1984 on Mining Claims SSM 691950 et al 1n the Township of Olsen.

We have norrecord that you provided the full reports and maps to the Minister within the sixty day period provided by Section 77 of the Mining Act.

Unless you can provide evldenceyby April 26, 1984 that the reports and maps were submitted as requifH, ; the mining recorder will be dlrectMdto cancel the i work credits recorded on February 8, 1984. \

Yours ttitfetely, f, .0.4 J ! i

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 ^ l"^"i -f'.'^ .,i ^*"Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone:(416)965-6918

A. Barr:me

cc: Mining RecorderSault Ste. Marie, Ontario //3M " fr*

BUSH PILOT CORPORATION INC.

18 April 1984

Mining Lands Branch Whitney Block Room 6610 Queens Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

Attention Mr. Fred Mathews

Dear Mr. Mathews;

Re: Report of Work Olsen Township

49 Wellington Street East, Suite 201 Toronto, Ontario M5E 1C9

(416)868-1555

These claims have had an airbourne survey done on them on my behalf by Aerodat Ltd. of Toronto.

The report of work was done and submitted to the Mining Recorder in Sault Ste. Marie in February.

We are a bit late in filing the reports with your office due to our engineer being in the field, and unable to complete his report. He has just returned prior to breakup and we should have the material into your office next week or let us say no later than the end of the month.

I would appreciated your patience in this matter.

RECEIVED Yours very truly,

BUSH PILOT CORPORATION INC.

MINING LANDS SCCTION Sadowski, President

JS:jme Encl.

1984 05 10 Our File: 2.6682

Mrs. H.V. St. Oule*Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources875 Queen Street EastBox 669Sault Ste. Marie, OntarioP6A 5N2

Dear Madam:

We have received reports and maps fo.' an Airborne Geophysical(Electromagnetic and Magnetometer i VLF) Survey submitted on Mining Claims SSM 706313 et al 1n the Township of Olsen.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

Yours sincerely,

S. E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-6918

R. P1chette:mc

cc: Richard GlrouxSault Ste. Marie, Ontario

cc: Edward GlrouxSault Ste. Marie, Ontario

cc: Pack FalstromSault Ste. Marie, Ontario

rio

Ministry otNaturalResources

1984 08 02 Your File: 137-84,36-84 Our File: 2.6682

Mrs. M.V. St. OulesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources875 Queen Street East, Box 669Sault Ste. Marie, OntarioP6A 5N2

Dear Madam:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will b* s ent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R. J. Pichette at 416/965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W30. I sherwood:me

Ends.to: Ted Giroux

131 Chippewa Street Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6C 2A2

cc: Jack Falstrom131 Chippewa Street Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6C 2A2

cc: Richard Giroux131 Chippewa Street Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6C 2A2

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining i Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

1984 08 30 Your File: 137-84* 36-84 Our F11e:2.6682

Mrs. M.Y. St. JulesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources875 Queen Street EastP.O. Box 669Sault Ste. Marie, OntarioP6A SN2

Dear Madam:

RE: Notice of Intent dated August 2, 1984. Airborne Geophysical (Electromagnetic 4 Magnetometer ft VLF) Survey on Mining Claims SSM 706313 et al 1n the Township of Olsen.

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please Infora the recorded holder of these lining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: (416) 965-6918D. Isherwood:secc: Ted Glroux cc: Oack Falstrom

131 Chlppewa St 131 CMppewa StSault Ste. Marie Ont. Sault Ste. Karlt,Ont.P6C 2A2 P6C 2A2

cc: Richard 81roux 131 CMppewa St Sault Ste. MarltOOnt PIC 2A2

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining A Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

cc: Resident GeologistSault Ste. Marie, Ontario

FOR

INFOFWTION

, - - - 'i* V^-r" i" - f . -' .'f Vrl -"i- 'j-'*"."-'t V -"* ^' ' ' ' , " i -.' *j ' -" "*j^ */ '*/, ' C '- ''' . '-J:^ :H-.^^ ;'^i; /'- '-f/'v-' ^3 ''^'f;-^

AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY

- w

RATCHAWANA

T AERODAT LIMITED

Augus

4 N

^: :- K

^-^.'? ;'"A ^ ' '•'*7'-Q^jfcti;'ite*jp*: 'fz*/--- :-*--irv ' ar,- . . - ;.^-ti-A.* *.*s?^ '" ^i^,.-.'"-''"c-'s-..-i-.' .- - y. sal''.^ * "v.v . -

w

TOTAL FIELD MAGNETIC MAP

.miC-HAWANA

T AERODAT LIMITED

August , 98:3

.