Rover Navigation and Visual Odometry : A New Framework for Exploration Activities

Rover Navigation and Visual Rover Navigation and Visual Odometry: A New Framework for Odometry: A New Framework for Exploration ActivitiesExploration Activities

Enrica Zereik, Enrico Simetti, Alessandro Sperindé, Sandro Torelli, Fabio Frassinelli, Davide Ducco and Giuseppe Casalino

GRAAL Lab, DIST, University of GenoaGRAAL Lab, DIST, University of Genoa

ICRA Planetary Rover Workshop

Anchorage, Alaska, 3 May 2010

• to deal with the underlying specific hardware platform

• to solve problems related to real-timereal-time constraints of control systemscontrol systems

• to provide data-unawaredata-unaware communication mechanisms• to be reusedreused for different control systems in several

applications

Develop a software architecture to let researchers focus their attention on the control control algorithm algorithm only, without caring about the underlying physical system



Why a Framework?Why a Framework?

• Minimization Minimization of the number of code lines not strictly related to the control algorithm

• Standard communicationcommunication mechanism between control tasks (minimum impact on the algorithm)

• Capability of coordinationcoordination between remote frameworks

Main ObjectivesMain Objectives• Independency Independency of each control algorithm

from the underlying software platform






KAL

Abstraction LevelsAbstraction Levels• Independency Independency of each control algorithm






• Standard communicationcommunication mechanism between control tasks (minimum impact on the algorithm)WF









from the underlying software platformBBS



• WorkFrame Name ServerWorkFrame Name Server: abstraction of the OS resources and services

KAL: Kernel Abstraction KAL: Kernel Abstraction LayerLayer



• System ManagerSystem Manager: resource request handling• SchedSched: Rel Sched can synchronize frameworks• LoggerLogger: communication toward user

WF: WorkFrameWF: WorkFrameICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


• Inter-task communication

• Resource access• Both local and

remote tasks• Shared

BlackBoard publishing data

• Local execution of computation involving BB data

BBS: BlackBoard SystemBBS: BlackBoard SystemICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


Resources, SchedulingDevice I/O1

2

3

4

2

3

41 Mutually Exclusive

Interprocess Data Sharing (also with remote tasks)Network Communication

C++ Math Routines

Framework HierarchyFramework HierarchyICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


• Feature ExtractionFeature Extraction: in each image of the stereo pair

• Stereo MatchingStereo Matching: correspondence research• TriangulationTriangulation: correspondent 3D point computation

• Motion EstimationMotion Estimation: estimation of the motion occured between the two considered stereo image pairs

Visual Odometry ModuleVisual Odometry Module

• Tracking in TimeTracking in Time: tracking the same features in the following image acquisition



Visual Odometry ModuleVisual Odometry Module• Feature ExtractionFeature Extraction: in each image of the

stereo pair

• TriangulationTriangulation: correspondent 3D point computation



• Stereo MatchingStereo Matching: correspondence research

LOG filtering +SURF (robust descriptors )









Epipolar constraint, descriptor-based








Subject to erros, outliers rejected








No external estimation, descriptor-based








Least Square (outlier rejection, initial estimation) + Maximum Likelihood Estimation

Visual Odometry ModuleVisual Odometry ModuleICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


Experimental SetupExperimental SetupICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


• Custom mobile platform @ GRAAL• Tricycle-like structure• Bumblebee2 stereo camera system

Preliminary ResultsPreliminary ResultsICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


GRAAL Lab, DIST, University of GenoaGRAAL Lab, DIST, University of GenoaEuropean Space AgencyEuropean Space AgencyThales Alenia Space, ItalyThales Alenia Space, Italy

Enrica Zereik, Andrea Sorbara, Andrea Merlo, Frederic Didot and Giuseppe Casalino

Robotic Crew Assistant for Robotic Crew Assistant for Exploration Missions: Vision, Force Exploration Missions: Vision, Force Control and Coordination StrategiesControl and Coordination Strategies



Eurobot Wet ModelEurobot Wet ModelICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


JR3 force/torque sensor

7 d.o.f. arms, one camera on each

four-wheeled rover for autonomous navigation

pan/tilt stereo cameras forrover navigation

pan/tiltstereoscopic headfor manipulation

exchangeable end-effector

arm cameras

Eurobot Ground Eurobot Ground PrototypePrototype



CoordinationCoordination• Coordination Rover and Arms• Dynamic Programming-based strategy

VisionVision• Object recognition and centering• ARToolKiTPlus and OpenCV support

ForceForce• Approaching and actual grasping• Contact detection

EGP - Control AspectsEGP - Control AspectsICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


Dynamic Programming-based Dynamic Programming-based • Coordination of robotic macro-structures• Independent from the specific system configuration• Many different control objectives can be required

22

2

min

minarg1

qJySx

qJySxqA

iiiq

oi

iiiAq

ii

Velocity controltask requirementAssociated

cost-to-goMoving

platformvelocity

General Control Architecture General Control Architecture with Priority Taskswith Priority Tasks



Task i-Task i-th:th:

General Control Architecture General Control Architecture with Priority Taskswith Priority Tasks

iiiiiii

iiiiiiiii

iiiiii

iiiiiii

HQQQhh

SJQPPPJSS

JJIHXJ

QJJhJxX

111

#111

##

11

,

,

,

,

22#2

ySXVySXJJI

zQyPhq

iiiiiiioi

iiii



aC

11 LJ L

11A LJ

1LppC

b

222

222

qJ

qJv

A

L

Use of relationships

Monitoring MM tendency toward 0

1

211

211

)3

)2

)1

qp

qJ

vqJv

A

L

,,22 vLq

221

22211

22211

,;,,)3,;,,)2,;,,)1

vvpL

vvLJvvvLJv

A

L

222

22

;,,~)3

;,,~)2

;,,~)1

qvp

qvJ

qvJv

A

L

2211 ,;,, vvLq

aC

pC

11L LJ11 LJ A 1pL

e

p

Backward PhaseBackward PhaseICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


RemarksRemarks• The risk of MM losses still exists(e.g. if the object must be very high lifted)• If a MM loss is detected the lastlastresort solutionresort solution is modulating• Implicit Priority ChangeImplicit Priority Change

),,(22 vLq

pC222

222

qJ

qJv

A

L

),;,,( 2211 vvLq

22v

1qaC

p b

e

pC

aC

2v2

2q

v

Forward PhaseForward PhaseICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


),,(22 vLq

),,(3 vLqp

);,,(~3

);,,(~2

);,,(~1

2

22

22

qvp)

qvJ)

qvJv)

A

L

11L LJ

11A LJ

1Lp

pC

vvL ˆ),,(3

),,(22 vLq

),,(22 vLq

Backward phase at platform level

v̂v)1(v

o

Implicit Priority ChangeImplicit Priority ChangeICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


Vision-based Recognition Vision-based Recognition of Objectsof Objects

Marker-based object trackingMarker-based object tracking• Reliability• Robustness

Occurring problemsOccurring problems• Lighting conditions• Complexity of the captured scene• Distance from which the marker is seen

PreliminaryThresholding

ImageCleaning

Image

Zooming



Image from

camera

Autothreshold

Imagecleaning

To Estimator

Pose estimation

LPF

Pose

Es

timat

or

To E-GNC

Imagezooming

Image Processing ChainImage Processing ChainICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


angular error angular error after zooming

angular error after LPF

linear error linear error after zooming

linear error after LPF

Implicit Priority ChangeImplicit Priority ChangeICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


Direct Force Control StrategyDirect Force Control Strategy• Detect a contact with the object to be grasped• Compensate residual errors

Pure Force Only at the Palm LevelPure Force Only at the Palm Level• felt by the JR3 sensor• the contact point must belong to the palmsurface

ssf ,

ddrrr

rfT

yx

ss

,

known and constant

Force-based Approach Force-based Approach towards Objectstowards Objects



Velocity Generation Velocity Generation • Contact point estimation• Velocity assigned to the estimated contact point

• Compute velocity reference with respect to the robot end-effector

RemarksRemarks• Noisy sensor and too long distance from palm• Initial error very small thanks to vision

cxcx

ssc FFKx *

s

ss f

F

with

Force-based Approach Force-based Approach towards Objectstowards Objects





Simulative ResultsSimulative Results

Experimental ResultsExperimental ResultsICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


VideoVideo• 3. EGP Failed Equipment Replacement.avi

EGPEGP• EffectiveEffective and autonomousautonomous robotic crew assistant• Marker removal• PotentiallyPotentially, flight model

Planetary RoversPlanetary Rovers• Visual Odometry error less than 1%less than 1%• 3D reconstruction of the environment• DEM construction and autonomous navigation

Conclusions and Future Conclusions and Future WorkWork



EGPEGP[1] T. Kröger, D. Kubus and F. M. Wahl, “6D Force and Acceleration Sensor Fusion for Compliant Manipulation Control”, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China, October 2006.[2] B. J. Waibel and H. Kazerooni, “Theory and Experiments on the Stabilityof Robot Compliance Control”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, February 1991, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 95-104.[3] G. Bradski and A. Kaehler, “Learning OpenCV: Computer Vision with the OpenCV Library”, O'Reilly.[4] C. P. Lu, G. D. Hager and E. Mjolsness “Fast and Globally Convergent Pose Estimation From Video Images”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, June 2000, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 610-622.

References, IReferences, IICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


[5] B. Kainz and M. Streit, “How to Write an Application with Studierstube 4.0”, Technical report, Graz University of Technology, 2006.[6] J. Cai, “Seminar Report: Augmented Reality: the Studierstube Project”, Seminar report.[7] E. Zereik, A. Sorbara, G. Casalino and F. Didot, “Autonomous Dual-Arm Mobile Manipulator Crew Assistant for Surface Operations: Force/Vision-Guided Grasping”, International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies, Istanbul, Turkey, June 2009.[8] E. Zereik, A. Sorbara, G. Casalino and F. Didot, “Force/Vision-Guided Grasping for an Autonomous Dual-Arm Mobile Manipulator Crew Assistant for Space Exploration Missions”, International Conference on Automation Robotics and Control Systems, Orlando, USA, July 2009.

References, IIReferences, IIICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


[9] G. Casalino and A. Turetta, “Coordination and Control of Multiarm Nonholonomic Mobile Manipulators", MISTRAL: Methodologies and Integration of Subsystems and Technologies for Robotic Architectures and Locomotion, B. Siciliano, G. Casalino, A. De Luca, C. Melchiorri, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, Springer-Verlag, April 2004.[10] G. Casalino, A. Turetta and A. Sorbara, “Dynamic Programming based Computationally Distributed Kinematic Inversion Technique”, Advanced Space Technologies for Robotics and Automation, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, November 2006.[11] G. Casalino, A. Turetta and A. Sorbara, “DP-Based Distributed Kinematic Inversion for Complex Robotic Systems”, 7th Portuguese Conference on Automatic Control, Lisbon, Portugal, September 2006.[12] E. Zereik, “Space Robotics Supporting Exploration Missions: Vision, Force Control and Coordination Strategies”, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Genova, 2010.

References, IIIReferences, IIIICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


Visual OdometryVisual Odometry[1] M. Maurette and E. Baumgartner, “Autonomous Navigation Ability: FIDO Test Results”, 6th ESA Workshop on Advanced Space Technologies for Robotics and Automation, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, November 2000.[2] M. Maimone, Y. Cheng, and L. H. Matthies, “Two Years of Visual Odometry on the Mars Exploration Rovers”, Journal of Field Robotics, March 2007, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 169-186.[3] A. E. Johnson, S. B. Goldberg, Y. Cheng and L. H. Matthies, “Robust and Efficient Stereo Feature Tracking for Visual Odometry”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, USA, May 2008.[4] L. Matthies, “Dynamic Stereo Vision”, Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University.

References, IVReferences, IVICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


[5] D. Nistér, O. Naroditsky and J. Bergen, “Visual Odometry”, Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Washington, USA, June 2004.[6] Richard Hartley and Andrew Zisserman, “Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision”, Cambridge University Press, March 2004.[7] E. Trucco and A. Verri, “Introductory Techniques for 3-D Computer Vision”, Prentice Hall, 1998.[8] I. J. Cox, S. L. Hingorani, S. B. Rao and B. M. Maggs, “A Maximum Likelihood Stereo Algorithm”, Journal of Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 1996, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 542-567. [9] M. Fischler and R. Bolles, “Random Sample Consensus: a Paradigm for Model Fitting with Application to Image Analysis and Automated Cartography”, Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, June 1981, vol. 24, pp. 381-395.

References, VReferences, VICRA Planetary Rover Workshop


Thank you for your kind Thank you for your kind attention!!attention!!



Documents

Rover Navigation and Visual Odometry : A New Framework for Exploration Activities