Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PA R L I D e b a t e
Kornfein, Justin (*26)Round 6 6:00pm Room 3113Gov : 15 Wu - Ha l l
Opp: 9 Sawhney - YuP a r i ! D e b a t e
PROP ^T e a m C o d e # : t )
Judge's Name:_ irpT Q. \ 0
Judge's School Affiliationi a t i o n : A c o ^ ^ y
Prop Speaker #1_
Prop Speaker #2_
Team Code #:
Opp Speaker #1,
Opp Speaker #2_
D P I
^ ĈuJ A
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination rounds) j26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor
PA R L l D e b a t e
Round 5 6:00pm Room 3113Gov: 15 Wu - HallOpp: 9 Sawhney - YuP a r i ! D e b a t e
Judge's Name:_
Judge's School Affiliation:.
P R O PTeam Code
Prop Speaker #1
Prop Speaker #2_
Team Code #:
Opp Speaker #1.
Opp Speaker #2_
Please award each speaker points based on the following scâ30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualifî for elimination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor
Round 5 6:00pm Room 3113Gov : 15 Wu - Ha l l
Opp: 9 Sawhney - YuP a r i i D e b a t e
P R O PTeam Code #:
Prop Speaker #1. WProp Speaker #2 lAJi
^ J PA R L I D e b a t eJudge's Name:
Judge's School Affiliation:_
Team Code #:
Opp Speaker #1_
Opp Speaker #2_
ihr\j?u ptsT^S
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: /30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = VêGood27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify M elimination rounds)
26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor on the ̂ wins this debate.(Prop gr Opp)
R E A S O N F O R D E C I S I O N : / ; ; „ i A'RqIIo^
y
PA R L I D e b a t e
Chin, Liru (*15)Round 5 6:00pm Room 3114Gov : 14 F l o res - Peon
Opp: 13 Chetlapalli - BhardwajPar i i Deba te r ' i .
Ucv; <P R O P
Te a m C o d e # : I
Judge's Name:_ ru CXlJudge's School Affiliation:.
Prop Speaker #1. . ^ I L S
Prop Speaker #2 KC>0^
Team Code #:
Opp Speaker#!
Opp Speaker #2_
a ^ b .
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: /30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = VeryGQda
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for eMination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor
PA R L I D e b a t e
Kovitz, Bo (*6)Round 5 6:00pm Room 3114Gov: 14 Flores - PeonOpp: 13 Chetlapalli - BhardwajParii Debate
Judge's Name:_ 'g ICd
Judge's School Affiliation:. AoUoo^
P R O PTeam Code #: Team Code #:
Prop Speaker #1_
Prop Speaker #2_
p i s O p p S p e a k e r # 1
p t s O p p S p e a k e r # 2
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: y30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = VeryĜ d
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify forolimination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor
C o o f n n c u M > ^ c t U o i j O ' f z > C C U i n c u . 0 ^ S k . t ) l fi .tU^jodr ()^dv USĴ .
("T ûŝ jH^ ̂ Afr) ̂ utiJ J\oi\ji lâ Ua,'irzdr.jj tUji ''ViAcimrt. ̂ .e^Vu^CJAxJ a^Mire-Ss -f̂ Ciccsu^̂ : cT'f̂ CsruCr-e,u.Tce-/r cytJiiyvL LOdyLd̂ n̂cJl HciM̂k/VLpj f>d/Vn̂ . ̂ eccûse /botU. SyD
PA R L I D e b a t e
Judge's Name:_
Judge's School Affiliation:
P R O PTeam Code #:
Prop Speaker #1
Prop Speaker #2_
Team Code #:
pts -12.7 Opp Speaker #1_pts Zy Opp Speaker #2
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: /30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Verŷod
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify fop̂imination rounds)26-25 = Fair • 24-20 = Poor 7
P r o p 2 : O p p 2 :
' icesT} UP'TH^
TEAM CODE #: A3 on the f wins this debate.REASON FOR DECISION: zLtL
' ^ 1 a % h r f r & ^ u c r k i ^
PARLI Deba te
Judge's Name:.
Judge's School Affiliation:.
P R O PTeam Code #:
Prop Speaker #1
Prop Speaker #2_
T e a m C o d e # : m /
Opp Speaker #1
Opp Speaker #2. / pts 2'^Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: /
30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = VeryGp(od27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elifnination rounds)
26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor ̂ alyze the topic and the arguments
o f f e r e d d u r i n g t h e d e b a t e /• Evidence: How appropriately and efficiently the d̂aters support arguments with
evidence—̂which may include facts and referenĉ to authority as well as general knowledge• Argumentation: How directly and effectivelŷe debaters respond to the arguments madeb y t h e o t h e r s i d e /• Points of Information: How relevant and ̂ective were the questions and the answers
• Delivery: How well the debaters speak ,itL̂ organized, communicative style that is pleasantand easily understandable /
• Courtesy: How courteous and respectml the debaters were to opponents and judges
Using the above criteria, please ofTeî ompliments and/or suggestions for improvement toe a c h d e b a t e r : . . . j / \
P r o p 1 : o p p 1 : j ^P r o p 1 : O p p 1 ; j P t fi w e r H ,
0|Ood.VoNvirve.'i ovvA\n aewtvoJi, 9po
Fahmawi, Bassam El (*14)Round 5 6:00pm Room 3202Gov: 5 Holt - BroganOpp: 26 Saxena - DuncanP a r i ! D e b a t e
PARjjuI DebateJudge's Name: Sh
Judge's School Affiliation: | ̂O P P
Team Code #: nS-A
pfsj^Sj^ Opp Speaker #1 Vn Cpts'^S-S Opp Speaker #2 S ^ -P W
P R O PTeam Code #:
Prop Speaker #1.
Prop Speaker #2 ̂.^23.
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: /30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Cka(od
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for ejimination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor . . . ocK/\
• ' I ^ v \ / 7 s J ^
ClO^JM^—> «\
PA R L I D e b a t e
Judge's Name: Qe/pL
£ROPTeam Code #: ̂
Prop Speaker #1.
Prop Speaker #2.
nJifS
Judge's School AfSliationij.
7 7 ^Team Code #:
Opp Speaker #1
Opp Speaker
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: /30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = VeryG
(*22)Round 5 6:00pm Room 3203Gov: 27 Silver - EscarcegaOpp: 15 Wilcox - SuttonP a r i ! D e b a t e
U /het i / /J pîee/t0/yjf h ^ A / ' a / j .
Judge'a i ^ £ r a A i m A r / L <
7 PA R L I D e b a t e
s N a m e :
Ige'ŝ d̂ |̂AffiIiation:_P R O P
Te a m C o d e # :
Prop Speaker #1_
Prop Speaker #2j
Team Code #:
pts. 12 Opp Speaker#!p t s O p p S p e a k e r # 2 P t s
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: /30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Ve;yGood
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualifŷ elimination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor
Bearfoot, Sheelah (*8)Round 5 6:00pm Room 3203Gov: 27 Silver - EscarcegaOpp: 15 Wilcox - SuttonP a r i i D e b a t e
PA R L I D e b a t e
Judge's Name:
Judge's School Affiliation:,
P R O PTe a m C o d e Team Code #:
Prop Speaker #1 ptsĵ l̂ Opp Speaker #1 'Sm 1̂ ?) AProp Speaker #2 C) I I ̂ pts ̂ Opp Speaker #2 lô /rx. nts 9-
PA R L I D e b a t e
-Holt, ■lftnnvL.(*5y>Round 5 6:00pnn Room 3203Gov: 27 Silver - EscarcegaOpp: 15 Wilcox - SuttonPari! Debate
Judge's Name:
Judge's School Affiliation:)1 Affiliation: 0P R O P O P P
Team Code #: Team Code #:
Prop Speaker #1. t'btoji _pts Opp Speaker #1Prop Speaker #2 ̂ pts ̂ Opp Speaker #2
Opp Speaker #1_
Opp Speaker #2 kJ].«33>
Please award each speaker points based on the following scâ30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28=̂ryGood27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualî for elimination rounds)
26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor
PA R L I D e b a t eRound 6 7:30pm Room 3202Gov: 13 Barma - SinghOpp: 15 Wu - HallP a r i ! D e b a t e
Team Code#:P R O P
Prop Speaker #1
Prop Speaker #2_
pts_̂ 2j|pts '2^
J u d g e ' s N a m e : ' «■
Judge's School Affiliation:_
O P PTeam Code #:
Opp Speaker #1_
Opp Speaker #2_
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poof
Opp2-
w i n « f h i «
REASON FOR DECISION:
on the _j_)j2_L_wins this debate.(Prop or Opp)
Miller, Dana ^27)Round 6 7:30pm Room 3202Gov: 13 Barma - SinghOpp: 15 Wu-HailP a r i ! D e b a t e
Team G)de #:
5 / y w 5 W - / i f^ t X c c e ^ / ' - / U j t . U . $^ PARLI Debate
Judge's Name:_
Judge's School Affiliation:, 1/1^6^P R O P.
Team Code #:
Prop Speaker#!
Prop Speaker #2
p ts jJptsj^
bpp Speaker#!
Opp Speaker #2_
\ Mu)^
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor
T W . U S ^ Q - ^ / D O J ^ ^ U h^ 1 ^ ^ ( ^ i X - d w j K g i ( X C O L ^ U ^S k / 5 r \ r 0-OJllup, Duruk
Rounds 7:30pm Room3202Gov: 13 Barma - SinghOpp: 15 Wu-HallPari! Debate
P R O PTe a m C o d e # :
Prop Speaker#!
Prop Speaker #2_
PA R L I D e b a t e
Judge's Name: l-treA
Judge's School Affiliation:
Te a m C o d e # :
P tS^ bpp Speaker #1_Opp Speaker #2_ 'lA^u
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor V ( P & X J L J ^ A J . / ( \ i I a Lt h i s d e b a t e ,
( A y - c / x 6 ^ t -
on the Opp wins this debate.(Prop̂ ofdppi)
R E A S O N F O R D E C I S I O N : . ^ / / ^ L n H o ^
O^ai YWjJ., \H>^ aUA3
Brown, Cassidy (*26)Round 6 7:30pm Room 3203Gov: 7 Yau-Weeks - Porter-McAvoyOpp: 13 Kaushik - HuangP a r i i D e b a t e
PA R L I D e b a t e
P R O PTeam Code #:
Judge's Name
Judge's School Affiliation:,
Team Code #:
) D n o y H a
Prop Speaker #1_ A\/̂ l| pts_2̂ bpp Speaker#1 ̂ .ptsProp Speaker#2 Wec (\
Round 6 7:30pm Room 3203Gov: 7 Yau-Weeks - Porter-McAvoyOpp: 13 Kaushik - HuangParii Debate
P R O PTeam Code #:
PA R L l D e b a t e
Judge's Name:_
Judge's School Affiliation:
Te a m C o d e # :
Prop Speake
Prop Speaker #2 PtsliOpp Speaker#!
Opp Speaker #2_
1 *̂ Kauah\Vl
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: /30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very (̂d
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for ̂ unination rounds)2d-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor
Rizvi, Alyna (*17)Round 6 7:30pm Room 3203Gov: 7 Yau-Weeks - Porter-McAvoyOpp: 13 Kaushik - HuangParii Debate
P R O PTeam Code #:
Prop Speaker #1
Prop Speaker #2 its3*S
PA R L I D e b a t e
Judge's Name:_
Judge's School Affiliation:
Team Code #:
bpp Speaker #1_
Opp Speaker #2_
,i'lc pts dĴ
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor iA bAftdt CJU dil9fuCA.t PtbiYi LbiPl- /Aaaa bt. LoS H . /AflAi
(Prop or/Opp)
T U
C M I c o u A d S t f t l LW not
Round 6 7;30pm Room 3204Gov; 13 Chetlapalli - BhardwajOpp: 6 Cramer - GriffinP a r i ! D e b a t e
3 ^Cto r
P R O PTeam Code#:
Prop Speaker #1_ 619. h
Prop Speaker #2
P A R L I
Judge's Name:_
Judge's School Affiliation:
Team Code #:
bpp Speaker #1.
Opp Speaker #2
AyCo ( Jfm
p t s
pts
U / ( P
A U» (f> ^
jfciAi
MacKinnon2, Jesse (*7)Round 6 7:30pm Room 3204Gov: 13 Chetlapalli - BhardwajOpp: 6 Cramer - GriffinP a r i i D e b a t e
PA R L I D e b a t e
P R O PTeam Code#:
Prop Speaker #1 ̂ ̂'̂ 3̂Prop Speaker #2 r.i/\̂A'\ rj/W 111
Judge's Name
Judge's School Affiliation:
Team Code #:
bpp Speaker#!
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Vpr5^Good
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qaal̂for elimination rounds)2d-25 = Fair * 24-20 = Poor 4 y ^ J l W i f y W" ^ I / J 7 - ( i , i ( o .
TEAM CODE #: / ^ on the ^wins this debate.REASON FOR DECISION:
o n t h e ' ^ i w i n s t h i s d e b a t e .
(Prop or Opp)
■ * r ' « K ' t ,^ i h . H i / f
•7i< Uip^ ^Ul4 SCcjn:jrcaAi ^ ^Qian, Yuyun (*8)Round 6 7:30pm Room 3204Gov; 13 Chetlapalli - BhardwajOpp: 6 Cramer - GriffinP a r i ! D e b a t e
PA R L I D e b a t e
Judge's Name:_ r
Park, Kenny (*17)Rounds 7:30pmRoom3205Gov: 26 Maciorowski - GreenbergOpp: 5 Stamm-Kirk - BurshteynP a i i i D e b a t e
P R O P .Team Code#:
PA R L l D e b a t e
Judge's Name: [AM
Judge's School Affiliation:
GPP ^Team Code #: 6
bpp Speaker #1
Opp Speaker #2_
Prop Speaker #1
Prop Speaker #2
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor
Gov: 26 Maclorowski - GreenbergOpp: 5 Stamm-KIrk - BurshteynParii Debate
PA R L I D e b a t e
Judge's Name:_
P R O PTeam Code #:
Judge's School Affiliatioii:
Team Code # :
5oyjMYA__̂ ' 1̂IViation: I RviiMG70A/
Prop Speaker#1̂ • 0\'̂JLf\ho'̂ _ Pts ̂Prop Speaker #2, ̂ MctfOlQcJL>si/' pts.
bpp Speaker#!,
Opp Speaker #2_
Please award each speaker points based on the foUowing scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 =/\i'ery Good
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination roimds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor
{ / J a c ^ / fPA R L I D e b a t e
Rounds 7:30pm Room 3205Gov: 26 Maciorowski - GreenbergOpp: 5 Stamm-Kirk - BurshteynParii Debate
J u d g e ' s N a m e : t / V / ^ ^
Judge's School Affiliation: lx/€̂ / ̂Team Code #:
P R O P 7 ( O F F ^T e a m C o d e # : ^ ^ T e a m C o d e # :
Prop Speaker #1 (j"I; C, rV<
TEAM CODE #: on tĥ ^̂ ^̂ wins this debate.REASON FOR DECISION:
A f ^ O ^ f(^CAjia^ /-» ^ cyicr(rxA~
t . ^ . s l '
Griffith, Kevin ^6)Rounds 7:30pm Room 3113Gov : 15 W i l cox - Su t t on
Opp: 27 Miller - AmantP a r l i D e b a t e
Team Code#:
PA R L I D e b a t e
Judge's Name
Judge's School Affiliatioii: O&KICBtd?]P R O P / r Team Code # ;
Prop Speaker #1_
Prop Speaker #2_
0 r\ pts 7^> X . . u i ?
bpp speaker#!.
Opp Speaker #2_
O P P
n r
f, 2-f■
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to quaUfy for elimination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor
Rounds 7:30pm Room3113G o v : 1 5 W i l c o x - S u t t o n
Opp: 27 Miller - AmantP a r i ! D e b a t e
PA R L I D e b a t e
Judge's School Affiliation: V/̂ •P R O P
Team Code #:
Prop Speaker #1_
Prop Speaker #2_
Team Code #:
bpp Speaker #1_
Opp Speaker #2_
N.23
Please award each speaker points based on the following scaler30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination rounds)26-25 = Fair * 24-20 = Poor
stone, Kenny (*17)Round 6 7:30pm Room 3113G o v : 1 5 W i l c o x - S u t t o n
Opp: 27 Miller - AmantP a r i i D e b a t e
PA R L I D e b a t e
Judge's Name:
Judge's School Affiliation:
P R O PTeam Code #:
O P PTeam Code #:
Prop Speaker #1_
Prop Speaker #2_ H^acoxbpp Speaker # 1 V-̂ Aijt/V
pts Opp Speaker #2 A"
Please award each speaker points based on the foUowing scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Ver̂ood
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor oc rnM. fU ivoiur oatTEAM CODE #:_53REASON FOR DECISION:
' * •
(toes
« to Why
S » M , r f t e S " "■
K
Panda, Kamal (*9)Round 6 7:30pm Room 3114G o v : 2 6 S a x e n a - D u n c a n
Opp: 6 Curl - FeinbergPari! Debate
PA R L I D e b a t e
Judge's Name:_
6^ pam^ I or\^Team Code#:
Judges School Affiliation:k P e ^ n d U v E F f T ^
Team Code #:
Prop Speaker #2_ . p „ ^Opp Speaker #1_
Opp Speaker #2 Ir&nhmPlease award each speaker points based on the following scale:
30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Gô27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elWnation rounds)
26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor 7n. -^pi^
Dppl: 0CmfMhs £\p wh- mM
orMn'i-peAr, i/^i^
Opp 2 : lAxas (\p6iC/ eiA\k Q0n-̂
CH^/KftAy
w o p hMcrnS^ ^ OP) nWri^ fW tided^\69nOB^dc?
c|J|w i n s t h i s d e b a t e .
REASON FOR DECISION:or Opp)
^ i a c i t > a L I h o ^ e M m ^A-. % on .he PW wins this deba.P'̂ f^ o r O p p )R E A S O N F O R D E C I S I O N : P O S f . - ' ^ s ^
'y^ f&^a^ J&^hnm -^le, 0ff' dij {py'hi i/fn^ O0JOQ.49 (}4JO&I0^ e^m^m §f\rhg7>s^ (^\^er^\pe^e PnAmf & m M O i m O m i s P l h e i d s e
\ j j O fi U \ t m e - \ A ^ o n . m e i s t j e w ^ e t d s L P
Vengerova, Maria (*15)Round 6 7:30pm Room 3114G o v ; 2 6 S a x e n a - D u n c a nOpp: 6 Curl - FeinbergP a r i i D e b a t e
PA R L I D e b a t e
Judge's Name:_
Judge's School Affiliation:
P R O PTeam Code #: 2.
Prop Speaker #2 QcCi
Team Code #: o
pts 2 ̂ bpp Speaker # 1PtSî ̂ Opp Speaker #2_
Pts^ ^
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: /30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good /
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination niwds)16-15 = Fair 24-20 = Poor "
Chen, Angel (*14)Round 6 7:30pm Room 3114G o v : 2 6 S a x e n a - D u n c a n
Opp: 6 Curl - FeinbergP a r i i D e b a t e
PA R L I D e b a t e
Judge's Name:
Judge's School Affiliation:,
Team Code#:PROP ^
Team Code #:
P r o p S p e a k e r # 1 p t s
Prop Speaker #2 .QC/>(. pts 2-̂Opp Speaker #1,
Opp Speaker #2_
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for eliminatipn rounds)20-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor