arX

iv:1

606.

0266

3v2

[ph

ysic

s.at

m-c

lus]

4 J

ul 2

017

Imaging the breakdown of molecular-frame dynamics through

rotational uncoupling

Lucas J. Zipp,1, 2 Adi Natan,1 and Philip H. Bucksbaum1, 2, 3

1Stanford PULSE Institute, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA2Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA

3Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA

We demonstrate the breakdown of molecular-frame dynamics induced by the uncoupling of molec-ular rotation from electronic motion in molecular Rydberg states. We observe this non-Born-Oppenheimer regime in the time domain through photoelectron imaging of a coherent molecularRydberg wave packet in N2. The photoelectron angular distribution shows a radically differenttime evolution than that of a typical molecular-frame-fixed electron orbital, revealing the uncou-pled motion of the electron as it precesses around the averaged anisotropic potential of the rotatingion-core.

In the standard Born-Oppenheimer picture, electronsoccupy orbitals that are fixed to the molecular frameand display the symmetries of the underlying molecu-lar structure. Recent experiments in ultrafast and strongfield physics have utilized aligned ensembles of molecules,allowing for molecular frame measurements of excitedstate dynamics [1–4] and XUV and tunnel ionization [5–10] that are sensitive to electron orbital geometry. Thissimple picture breaks down for non-penetrating Rydbergelectrons, where the electron wave function has minimaloverlap with the ion-core. Coriolis-type forces can decou-ple the electron motion from the rotating core leading toa breakdown of Born-Oppenheimer molecular frame dy-namics in a process known as l-uncoupling [11].The complex interplay between electronic and nuclear

motion in the l-uncoupling regime presents a unique op-portunity to study non-Born-Oppenheimer rotational-electronic coupling in molecules. The phenomenon of l-uncoupling has been previously inferred by the perturbedspacing of rotational levels of high-lying Rydberg states[12–17], but the dynamics have never before been ob-served directly.Here we report the direct imaging in the time do-

main of the uncoupled motion of a molecular Rydbergelectron. This is achieved through multiphoton prepa-ration and subsequent photoelectron imaging of a co-herent superposition of electronic states in the 4f Ry-dberg manifold of N2. We track the angular motion ofthe l-uncoupled Rydberg electron and measure the effectof uncoupling on its laboratory-frame dynamics, provid-ing a close view of the coherent dynamics of a molecularsystem in a non-Born-Oppenheimer regime. This workcomplements previous angle-integrated measurements ofRydberg molecules that have focused on other aspects ofrotational-electronic coupling, most notably stroboscopiceffects on the radial motion of a Rydberg wave packet[18–21].The nl Rydberg manifold of a molecule consists of

(2l + 1) states, which in the Born-Oppenheimer limitcorrespond to the quantized projections Λ of the elec-

tronic orbital angular momentum onto the internuclearaxis. The coupling between the various angular mo-menta of a diatomic molecule can be characterized withbasis sets known as Hund’s cases [22]. In the case ofthe singlet Rydberg states of N2, with electronic spinS = 0, the transition to the l-uncoupling regime is thendescribed as a change in basis from Hund’s case (b) (theBorn-Oppenheimer limit) to Hund’s case (d) (the un-coupled limit). Excluding nuclear spin degrees of free-dom, this corresponds to a change in quantum labelsfrom |JM ; lΛ〉 → |JM ; lR〉, where J is the total angu-lar momentum of the system with lab frame projectionM , l is the orbital angular momentum of the Rydbergelectron, and R is the total angular momentum of theion-core. In the fully uncoupled limit, where the eigen-states of the system are given by Hund’s case (d) states,the electron wave function is totally decoupled from theion-core molecular frame.The full rotational-electronic Hamiltonian of a di-

atomic molecule is given by [23]:

H = Hev +BR2, (1)

where Hev is the vibronic Born-Oppenheimer Hamilto-nian and R corresponds to the rotational angular mo-mentum of the nuclei with rotational constant B. Hev isdiagonal in the Born-Oppenheimer Hund’s case (b) basisset, and for non-penetrating Rydberg states, this energyis approximately:

〈Hev〉nlΛ = Enl + aΛ2, (2)

where Enl is the non-rotating energy (electronic and vi-brational) of the |nlΛ = 0〉 Rydberg state and a is a con-stant that depends on the strength of the anisotropic in-teraction of the Rydberg electron with the core [16]. Non-penetrating Rydberg states refers to Rydberg electronswith minimal overlap with the ion-core wave function, asis generally true for Rydberg electrons with l > 2 [24].When the electronic splitting is large relative to the rota-tional energy spacing of the system, which occurs when

2

x [a.u.]-10 0 10

a=B

y [a

.u.]

-10

0

10

x [a.u.]-10 0 10

x [a.u.]-10 0 10

x [a.u.]-10 0 10

x [a.u.]-10 0 10

a=10

0By

[a.u

.]

-10

0

10

t=0a=

4000

By

[a.u

.]

-10

0

10

t=1/16Tc t=1/8 Tc t=3/16 Tc t=1/4 Tc

min

max

FIG. 1. Breakdown of molecular frame dynamics. The outer lobes (blue-yellow color scale) correspond to the Rydberg electrondensity with a 4f orbital radial distribution, while the inner lobe (white) shows the angular distribution of the nuclei, withan artificially chosen radial distribution for better visualization. The simulated homonuclear diatomic system starts out in alocalized rotational wave packet centered at |J = 30,M = 30〉 with an f Rydberg electron aligned along the internuclear axisin a Λ = 0 state. The electron and ion-core position densities are plotted at times corresponding to fractions of the classical

nuclear rotation period, Tc = π/(B√

J(J + 1)). Each row displays the dynamics for a different value of the electronic splittingparameter a, as given in equation (2). The top row corresponds to the Born-Oppenheimer regime, while the bottom row showscompletely uncoupled nuclear and rotational dynamics. (See Supplemental Material for full movies.)

aΛ2 >> BR2, then the Born-Oppenheimer approxima-tion holds, and the electron wave function is firmly fixedto the molecular frame. As the electronic energy split-ting between Λ states decreases relative to the rotationalenergy, the electronic motion and the nuclear rotationbegin to mutually perturb each other. This results inthe well-known behavior of Λ-doubling, which removesthe degeneracy between even and odd parity states forΛ 6= 0 [11]. If the electronic splitting is reduced further,the l-uncoupling regime is reached and the electron or-bital angular momentum uncouples from the molecularaxis and Λ is no longer a good quantum number. Instead,the eigenstates are characterized by the projection of theRydberg electron orbital angular momentum onto the ro-tational axis of the core. The direct consequence is thatby exciting a coherent superposition of sublevels in anl-uncoupled Rydberg manifold, the electron wave packetoscillates in the time-average molecular potential createdby the rotating molecule. The frequency of these angular

oscillations depends on the strength of the interaction ofthe Rydberg electron with the anisotropic ion-core po-tential and is independent of the rotational period of thecore.The transition from the Born-Oppenheimer regime

to the l-uncoupled regime is accompanied by dramaticchanges in the coupled electronic-nuclear angular dynam-ics. This can be visualized in the case of quasi-classicalnuclear rotational wave packets, similar to those achiev-able with the optical centrifuge technique [25]. Using theHamiltonian in Eq. (2), we simulate the electron andion-core position density as a function of time (see Sup-plementary Material for details). The Rydberg electronis initially aligned along the internuclear axis of the rotat-ing molecule, and the ensuing dynamics of the system forseveral values of the electronic splitting parameter a areshown in Fig. 1. For large electronic splittings, the sys-tem follows Born-Oppenheimer dynamics, and the elec-tronic wave function is tightly bound to the rotating in-

3

0.8

1

0 Trev/2 Trev

0.3

0.5

0.8

1

0 Trev/2 Trev

0.3

0.5

β2

0.81.1

0 Trev/2 Trev

<co

s2>

core

0.30.6

x

y

x

y

x

y

x

y

x

y

x

y

(c)(b)(a)max

min

FIG. 2. The simulated electron and ion-core angular distribution time evolution of a nf Rydberg electron. A model N2-likediatomic molecule is pumped to an nf Rydberg state with a 5-photon excitation and subsequently probed through single photonionization (linear polarization of pump and probe along the x-axis). The upper row of images show the electron position densityof the Rydberg electron (before probing) at times corresponding to peak ion-core alignment and anti-alignment which occurnear Trev and Trev/2. A 4f hydrogenic radial wave function is used for visualization. The molecular alignment direction foreach image is depicted by the ball-and-stick graphic. The β2 paramater of the photoelectron angular distribution and the< cos2 > alignment value of the ion-core distribution is also shown. (a) Simulation for multiphoton excitation restricted to theΛ = 0 eigenstate of the f manifold with a = 2400B, where B is the rotational constant of the cation core. The PAD displaysa typical Born-Oppenheimer molecular alignment signal. (b-c) Simulation for multiphoton excitation assuming all levels ofthe f manifold are accessible, with an electronic splitting of a = 6B and a = 0.6B, showing the progressive development ofl-uncoupled dynamics.

ternuclear axis (top row). As the interaction strength de-creases between the Rydberg electron and the anisotropicpart of the core potential, the electron motion first lagsbehind the core rotation before jumping ahead, produc-ing an oscillatory motion resembling loosely coupled pen-dula (middle row). Further decrease in the anisotropic in-teraction strength leads to uncoupled motion of the elec-tron and the core (bottom row). The nuclei continue torotate, while the Rydberg electron density remains fixedin the lab reference frame, unperturbed by the nuclearmotion.The uncoupling behavior of Rydberg states can be

observed directly in time- and angle-resolved photoelec-tron spectra. A multiphoton pump pulse initiates thel-uncoupling dynamics by exciting a molecular Rydbergmanifold coupled to a coherent rotational wave packet.The state of the system may then be probed at latertimes through single photon ionization of the Rydbergstate. Through numerical simulations we can explorehow the time-dependent photoelectron angular distribu-tion (PAD) in this pump-probe scheme is expected tochange with the transition from Born-Oppenheimer dy-namics to the l-uncoupled regime. The simulations usethe same Hamiltonian of Eq. (2) used to generate thevisualization in Fig. 1, however we now prepare the Ry-dberg wave packet assuming an impulsive, perturbativefive-photon transition from the ground state to a 4f Ry-dberg manifold, and include an impulsive single photon

ionization step to create the photoelectron angular dis-tribution. The PAD is then characterized by a sum ofeven-order Legendre polynomials,

I(θ) =σ

4π[1 + β2P2(cos θ) + β4P4(cos θ) + · · ·], (3)

where σ is the total angle-integrated yield.Figure 2 shows the simulated PAD for several val-

ues of the splitting parameter a. For excitation toan isolated substate of a manifold with large electronicsplittings, the time-dependent PAD exhibits a typicalBorn-Oppenheimer molecular frame alignment depen-dence (Fig. 2(a)). As the electronic splitting decreasesand all the manifold states are coherently populated (Fig.2(b)), the l-uncoupling regime is approached and thePAD alignment signal no longer follows the instanta-

neous ion-core alignment, and rotational-electronic cou-pling significantly perturbs the dynamics of the ion-corerotational wave packet. For very small electronic split-tings (Fig. 2(c)), a clear separation of the rotational andelectronic time scales is achieved in what is sometimesreferred to as a reverse Born-Oppenheimer regime.We directly observe this dynamic l-uncoupling behav-

ior in the 4f Rydberg manifold of N2. We employ a≈100 fs 400 nm excitation pulse with a peak intensity of≈1014 W/cm2. The pulse excites molecules to the 4f Ry-dberg manifold via a transient five-photon resonance dueto the intensity-dependent ac Stark shift [26]. The elec-

4

tron wave packet is subsequently probed through singlephoton ionization by a time-delayed, co-propagating 800nm pulse of similar duration and intensity as the pumppulse. The resulting photoelectron momentum distribu-tion is collected using a velocity map imaging spectrom-eter (VMI)[27]. The pulses have linear polarizations par-allel to each other and to the face of the microchannelplate. More information on the experimental setup canbe found elsewhere [28].The photoelectron angular distribution of the 4f Ryd-

berg state is extracted from the momentum distributionby first subtracting the background pump-only ionizationsignal and then integrating over the energy width of thephotoelectron peak.The experimentally measured βn values of the photo-

electron distribution for room temperature N2 as a func-tion of pump-probe delay are shown in Fig. 3(b). Themagnitude of βn for n > 8 is negligible, as can be seenfor β10. This agrees with the identification of the Ryd-berg state as an f orbital since single-photon ionizationselection rules dictate a maximum partial wave of l = 4,and hence a maximum nonzero β order of β8 for an f

orbital. Clear oscillatory signatures are seen in the β pa-rameters, some of which survive longer than the full 30ps scan range. The form and magnitude of these angularoscillations are shown in the polar plots in Fig. 3(a).Although the initial multiphoton excitation must also

coherently populate nuclear rotational states in N2+, the

time-dependent PAD shows no direct correlation withthe expected ion-core alignment dynamics of N2

+. Thesimulated ion-core alignment for the multiphoton excited4f state is shown in Fig. 3(c) along with the typicalBorn-Oppenheimer signal for comparison. The measuredtime-dependent PAD shows no evidence of the half andfull rotational revival periods near 4.3 and 8.7 ps, whichare the expected signatures of coherent rotational wavepackets in Born-Oppenheimer molecular systems [3, 29].Instead, the quantum beats in the angular distributioncorrespond to the small electronic splittings of the 4fmanifold in the presence of the anisotropic core. In thecompletely uncoupled regime described by Hund’s case(d), selection rules dictate that the state of the core is un-changed during photoionization and hence different ion-core rotational states are not coupled together in the pho-toionization process [30]. The result is a PAD which isentirely insensitive to the molecular frame motion. Thisis in contrast to the excitation of a low-lying valence elec-tronic state, where the electron wave function follows theinstantaneous orientation of the molecular frame and thetime-dependent PAD exhibits large variation in the β pa-rameters only near the quantum revivals of the rotationalwave packet [3, 29].The observed time-dependent PAD of the 4f manifold

can be compared to the model l-uncoupling simulation.Our model employs spectroscopic values for the 4f elec-tronic energies in the vibrational ground state of N2 [14],

FIG. 3. Direct observation of l-uncoupling dynamics. (a)Polar plots of the experimentally extracted photoelectron an-gular distribution from the 4f Rydberg manifold in N2 at se-lected probe times. (b) β values extracted from a least-squaresfit of the data to equation (3). The error is plotted as a shadedregion (where larger than the line thickness) corresponding tothe standard error from three separate pump-probe scans. (c)Simulated ion-core alignment after multiphoton excitation inN2. The top plot corresponds to excitation to a single Σ statein the Born-Oppenheimer regime, while the lower plot showsthe expected ion-core alignment signal for excitation to the4f Rydberg manifold.

rather than the approximate form given by Eq. (2). Theamplitude and phase of the discrete Fourier transformof the time-dependent β2 values from both experimentand model are shown in Fig. 4. The model reproducesthe main quantum beat frequencies seen in the exper-

5

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Frequency [THz]

0

0.3

0.6Amplitudeβ2

(arb.units)

experiment

model

-2π

-π

0

π

Pha

se (

rad)

FIG. 4. Fourier analysis. The amplitude of the discreteFourier transform of the time-dependent β2 value is shown forboth experiment and model. The shaded area around the ex-perimental curve corresponds to the standard error from thethree separate pump-probe scans. The phases of the threeprominent frequency components are also plotted for exper-iment and model (diamond markers). The standard error ofthe extracted phases are smaller than the marker dimensions.

iment, which occur in the 0.7-1.5 THz (700 fs-1.4 ps)range. The extracted phases of the prominent frequencycomponents are also plotted. The modeled phase valuesagree quite well with the measured phases, suggestingthat the impulsive 5-photon excitation model providesan adequate description of the pump process. The dis-crepancy in phases amount to shifts of < 170 fs, close tothe duration of the excitation pulse and the limits of theimpulsive model. Simulations of the higher order β pa-rameters show lower frequency oscillations (< 0.5 THz)that are not present in the experimental signal. Thisdiscrepancy may be due to coupling to nearby perturb-ing electronic states in N2 [14, 15], angular distortioninherent to non-inverted VMI images, or from the non-perturbative nature of the pump pulse [31].In summary, we have used time-resolved photoelec-

tron angular distributions to image the dynamics of thenon-Born-Oppenheimer l-uncoupling regime in the labframe. The complex behavior of the electron motion inthis regime is radically different from low-lying valencestate molecular frame motion. Future studies in whichthe ion-core and photoelectron angular distributions aresimultaneously measured would be highly beneficial inallowing for a direct experimental comparison of the ro-tational and electronic motion of the l-uncoupled system.In addition, the coherent excitation of l-uncoupled elec-tronic states shown in this work, when combined withexisting rotational wave packet preparation techniques[25, 32], offers the prospect of creating unique and exoticelectronic-rotational wave packets not possible in Born-Oppenheimer systems.This work was supported by the AMOS program,

Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Divi-sion, Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. De-partment of Energy.

[1] C. Z. Bisgaard, O. J. Clarkin, G. Wu, A. M. D. Lee,O. Geßner, C. C. Hayden, and A. Stolow, “Time-Resolved Molecular Frame Dynamics of Fixed-in-SpaceCS2 Molecules,” Science, vol. 323, pp. 1464–1468, Mar.2009.

[2] P. Hockett, C. Z. Bisgaard, O. J. Clarkin, and A. Stolow,“Time-resolved imaging of purely valence-electron dy-namics during a chemical reaction,” Nature Physics,vol. 7, pp. 612–615, Aug. 2011.

[3] C. Qin, Y. Liu, S. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Tang, andB. Zhang, “Direct observation of field-free alignment ofasymmetric molecules in excited states,” Physical Review

A, vol. 83, p. 033423, Mar. 2011.[4] O. Geßner, A. M. D. Lee, J. P. Shaffer, H. Reisler,

S. V. Levchenko, A. I. Krylov, J. G. Underwood, H. Shi,A. L. L. East, D. M. Wardlaw, E. t. H. Chrysostom, C. C.Hayden, and A. Stolow, “Femtosecond MultidimensionalImaging of a Molecular Dissociation,” Science, vol. 311,pp. 219–222, Jan. 2006.

[5] F. Kelkensberg, A. Rouzee, W. Siu, G. Gademann,P. Johnsson, M. Lucchini, R. R. Lucchese, and M. J. J.Vrakking, “XUV ionization of aligned molecules,” Phys-

ical Review A, vol. 84, p. 051404, Nov. 2011.[6] J. B. Williams, C. S. Trevisan, M. S. Schoffler, T. Jahnke,

I. Bocharova, H. Kim, B. Ulrich, R. Wallauer, F. Sturm,T. N. Rescigno, A. Belkacem, R. Dorner, T. Weber,C. W. McCurdy, and A. L. Landers, “Imaging Poly-atomic Molecules in Three Dimensions Using Molecu-lar Frame Photoelectron Angular Distributions,” Phys-

ical Review Letters, vol. 108, p. 233002, June 2012.[7] I. V. Litvinyuk, K. F. Lee, P. W. Dooley, D. M. Rayner,

D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, “Alignment-Dependent Strong Field Ionization of Molecules,” Phys-

ical Review Letters, vol. 90, p. 233003, June 2003.[8] M. Meckel, A. Staudte, S. Patchkovskii, D. M. Vil-

leneuve, P. B. Corkum, R. Dorner, and M. Spanner, “Sig-natures of the continuum electron phase in molecularstrong-field photoelectron holography,” Nature Physics,vol. 10, pp. 594–600, Aug. 2014.

[9] A. Staudte, S. Patchkovskii, D. Pavicic, H. Akagi,O. Smirnova, D. Zeidler, M. Meckel, D. M. Villeneuve,R. Dorner, M. Y. Ivanov, and P. B. Corkum, “Angu-lar Tunneling Ionization Probability of Fixed-in-SpaceH2 Molecules in Intense Laser Pulses,” Physical Review

Letters, vol. 102, p. 033004, Jan. 2009.[10] L. Holmegaard, J. L. Hansen, L. Kalhøj, S. Louise

Kragh, H. Stapelfeldt, F. Filsinger, J. Kupper, G. Mei-jer, D. Dimitrovski, M. Abu-samha, C. P. J. Martiny,and L. Bojer Madsen, “Photoelectron angular distribu-tions from strong-field ionization of oriented molecules,”Nature Physics, vol. 6, pp. 428–432, June 2010.

[11] R. Mulliken Journal of the American Chemical Society,vol. 86, no. 16, pp. 3183–3197, 1964.

[12] G. Herzberg and C. Jungen, “High orbital angular mo-mentum states in H2 and D2,” The Journal of Chemical

Physics, vol. 77, pp. 5876–5884, Dec. 1982.[13] R.-Y. Chang, C.-C. Tsai, T.-J. Whang, and C.-P. Cheng,

“Observation of L uncoupling in the 5∆g1 Rydberg stateof Na2,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 123,p. 224303, Dec. 2005.

[14] K. P. Huber, C. Jungen, K. Yoshino, K. Ito, and G. Stark,

6

“The f Rydberg series in the absorption spectrum of N2,”The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 100, pp. 7957–7972, June 1994.

[15] C. Jungen, K. P. Huber, M. Jungen, and G. Stark, “Thenear-threshold absorption spectrum of N2,” The Journal

of Chemical Physics, vol. 118, pp. 4517–4538, Mar. 2003.[16] C. Jungen and E. Miescher, “Absorption spectrum of

the NO molecule. IX. The structure of the f complexes,the ionization potential of NO, and the quadrupole mo-ment of NO+,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 47,pp. 1769–1787, Sept. 1969.

[17] E. F. McCormack, S. T. Pratt, J. L. Dehmer, and P. M.Dehmer, “Analysis of the 8f , 9f , and 10f , v = 1 Rydbergstates of N2,” Physical Review A, vol. 44, pp. 3007–3015,Sept. 1991.

[18] P. Labastie, M. C. Bordas, B. Tribollet, and M. Broyer,“Stroboscopic Effect between Electronic and Nuclear Mo-tion in Highly Excited Molecular Rydberg States,” Phys-

ical Review Letters, vol. 52, pp. 1681–1684, May 1984.[19] R. a. L. Smith, V. G. Stavros, J. R. R. Verlet, H. H.

Fielding, D. Townsend, and T. P. Softley, “The role ofphase in molecular Rydberg wave packet dynamics,” The

Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 119, pp. 3085–3091,Aug. 2003.

[20] W. Li, T. Pohl, J. M. Rost, S. T. Rittenhouse, H. R.Sadeghpour, J. Nipper, B. Butscher, J. B. Balewski,V. Bendkowsky, R. Lw, and T. Pfau, “A HomonuclearMolecule with a Permanent Electric Dipole Moment,”Science, vol. 334, pp. 1110–1114, Nov. 2011.

[21] H. H. Fielding, “RYDBERG WAVEPACKETS INMOLECULES: From Observation to Control,” Annual

Review of Physical Chemistry, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 91–117,2005.

[22] J. Hougen, National Bureau of Standards Monograph 115.U.S. Government Printing Office, 1970.

[23] J. M. Brown and A. Carrington, “Electronic and vibra-tional states,” in Rotational Spectroscopy of Diatomic

Molecules, Cambridge Molecular Science, Cambridge

University Press, 2003.[24] E. E. Eyler, “Autoionization of nonpenetrating rydberg

states in diatomic molecules,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 34,pp. 2881–2888, Oct 1986.

[25] A. Korobenko and V. Milner, “Adiabatic Field-FreeAlignment of Asymmetric Top Molecules with an OpticalCentrifuge,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 116, p. 183001,May 2016.

[26] K. L. Knappenberger Jr., E.-B. W. Lerch, P. Wen, andS. R. Leone, “Stark-assisted population control of coher-ent CS24f and 5p Rydberg wave packets studied by fem-tosecond time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy,” The

Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 127, p. 124318, Sept.2007.

[27] A. T. J. B. Eppink and D. H. Parker, “Velocity mapimaging of ions and electrons using electrostatic lenses:Application in photoelectron and photofragment ionimaging of molecular oxygen,” Review of Scientific In-

struments, vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 3477–3484, 1997.[28] L. J. Zipp, A. Natan, and P. H. Bucksbaum, “Probing

electron delays in above-threshold ionization,” Optica,vol. 1, p. 361, Dec. 2014.

[29] M. Tsubouchi, B. J. Whitaker, L. Wang, H. Ko-hguchi, and T. Suzuki, “Photoelectron Imaging on Time-Dependent Molecular Alignment Created by a Fem-tosecond Laser Pulse,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 86,

pp. 4500–4503, May 2001.[30] J. Xie and R. N. Zare, “Selection rules for the photoion-

ization of diatomic molecules,” The Journal of Chemical

Physics, vol. 93, pp. 3033–3038, Sept. 1990.[31] S. C. Althorpe and T. Seideman, “Molecular alignment

from femtosecond time-resolved photoelectron angulardistributions: Nonperturbative calculations on NO,” The

Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 110, pp. 147–155, Jan.1999.

[32] H. Stapelfeldt and T. Seideman, “Colloquium : Align-ing molecules with strong laser pulses,” Rev. Mod. Phys.,vol. 75, pp. 543–557, Apr 2003.