23
Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation, comparison with shrimp monoculture. Hochard S. 1 , Lemonnier H. 2 , Letourneur Y. 3 , Lorrain A. 4 , Royer F. 2 , Hubert M. 2 1 ADECAL Technopôle, 1 bis rue berthelot, BP 2384, 98846 Nouméa cedex, NEW CALEDONIA 2 IFREMER, LEAD NC, Station de Saint Vincent – 98812 Boulouparis, NEW CALEDONIA 3 Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie, Laboratoire LIVE, BP R4, 98851 Nouméa cedex, NEW CALEDONIA 4 IRD LEMAR, Centre IRD Nouméa, BP A5, 98848 Nouméa cedex, NEW CALEDONIA

Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and

bioremediation, comparison with shrimp monoculture.

Hochard S.1, Lemonnier H.2, Letourneur Y.3, Lorrain A.4, Royer F.2, Hubert M.2

1 ADECAL Technopôle, 1 bis rue berthelot, BP 2384, 98846 Nouméa cedex, NEW CALEDONIA

2 IFREMER, LEAD NC, Station de Saint Vincent – 98812 Boulouparis, NEW CALEDONIA

3 Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie, Laboratoire LIVE, BP R4, 98851 Nouméa cedex, NEW CALEDONIA

4 IRD LEMAR, Centre IRD Nouméa, BP A5, 98848 Nouméa cedex, NEW CALEDONIA

Page 2: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

• Sea cucumber fisheries represent 17 000 T.y-1 in dry weight (56 à 130 millions of US$.)

•Intensive fishing=> massive reduction of naturals stocks.

•Attractive aquaculture perspectives

•In china the sea cucumber aquaculture production reach 3 200 T.y-1 (dry weight) for the temperate species Apostichopus japonicus.

•The aquaculture of the tropical species Holothuria scabra is still at its beginning.

General context

Purcell et al. 2013

Page 3: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

+ No cost for structures.

- Expose to natural alas.

-Necessity of an important maritime concession.

+ Semi-controlled system.

+ Higher productivity.

- Cost link to the structures, energy and the feed.

Sea ranching:

Farming in pens

Farming in ponds

+ low cost of production, apart the pens.

- Expose to natural alas.

-Limited by the carrying capacity of the environment.

Different aquaculture methods

Page 4: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Its farming could be articulate with a principal species, here shrimp, with a double benefit:

•H. scabra farming could benefit from the organic matter produced/ accumulated by the culture of the principal species, sustaining its growth.

• Detritus assimilation by H. scabra could have a beneficial effect on the system quality and improving the environmental condition for the rearing of the principal species.

Former studies showed that direct co culture may not be viable (Bell et al., 2007).

Bioremediation

H. scabra = Benthic detrivorous species.

Agudo

Page 5: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

How to insert the farming of H.scabra in the New-Caledonian aquaculture based on shrimp farming?

Rotational culture between the shrimp L. stylirostris and H. scabra.

Rotational culture

The HOBICAL program:

Cascade culture between the shrimp L. stylirostris and H. scabra.

Page 6: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

How to insert the farming of H.scabra in the New-Caledonian aquaculture based on shrimp farming?

Rotational culture between the shrimp L. stylirostris and H. scabra.

Two goals :

- Maximize the production performances of H. scabra.- Bioremediate the pond in order to enhance the production performances of the shrimp

L. stylirostris.

Rotational culture

The HOBICAL program:

Cascade culture between the shrimp L. stylirostris and H. scabra.

Page 7: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Two step experiment in mesocosms:

Step 1: H. Scabra farming

Study of different culture protocol on the growth performances and on the environment evolution.

Step 2: Shrimp farming

Comparison of the performances of rotational culture with shrimp monoculture

Experimental structures:

16 mesocosms of 1,75 m2 (1600L)

Material and methods

Page 8: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Semester 1Semester 22014

Semester 1 Semester 22013 2015

Step 1 Step 2

Holothuria non fed

Holothuria fed

Classic dry-out

Long dry-out

New sediment

Semi-intensive shrimp pond

Shrimp

Shrimp

Shrimp

Shrimp

Shrimp

Holothuria

ShrimpHolothuria

Shrimp

Shrimp

Shrimp

Shrimp

Rotational culture

Shrimp monoculture

Material and methods

Page 9: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Step 1:

Study of different culture protocol on the growth performances and on the environment evolution.

Food supply (corn waste)

No food supplyNutrition protocol

High density (6 ind.m-2)

Low density (3 ind.m-2) Control (no animals)

Non fed fed

Low density

Material and methods

Page 10: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Feeding led to a better growth at the beginning of the experiment.

After 100 days, lower growth in spite of more favorable temperatures.

Mean weight

0

25

50

75

0 50 100 150 200Days

g

non fed

fed

Temperature

15

20

25

30

0 50 100 150 200Days

°C

Production performances

Page 11: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Production performances

Lower density led to constant growth, with higher mean weight.

Mean weight

0

25

50

75

0 50 100 150 200Days

g

non fedfedlow density

Page 12: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Production performances

Lower density led to constant growth, with higher mean weight.

Survivals were above 80% for all the treatments.

The carrying capacity of the system was equivalent for all the treatments at the end of the experiment.

=>Feeding might allow faster growth but cannot outcome the carrying capacity of the system.

Mean weight

0

25

50

75

0 50 100 150 200Days

g

non fedfedlow density

Final biomass

0

100

200

300

g.m-² non fedfed

low density

Page 13: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Bioremediation performances

The non feed treatment is equivalent to the control.

Feeding led to an enrichement of the sediment.

Bioremediation appeared to depend of the rearing strategy.

Benthic Chla

0

100

200

300

0 50 100 150 200Days

mg.m-2 non fed

fed

control

Sediment respiration

-8000

-6000

-4000

-2000

0

0 50 100 150 200

Days

µmolO2.m-².h-1

non fedfedcontrol

Page 14: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Conclusions of step 1

Holothuria non fed

Holothuria fed

Lowest production performances

Best “bioremediation”

Best production performances

Lowest “bioremediation”

Page 15: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Step 2:

Comparison of the performances of rotational culture with shrimp monoculture.

Impact on the next shrimp rearing

Holothuria non fed

Holothuria fed

Classic dry-out

Long dry-out

New sediment

All the mesocosmes received post larvae with a density of 20 shrimp .m-2 .

The experiment last for 120 days, from March to June

Page 16: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Classic dry-out

pH 6,87 7,15 7,33 7,21 6,84

Redox (mV) 68,1 18,3 19,0 24,1 41,9

Chl a (mg/m²) 16,6 66,8 119,7 120,5 147,2

OM (%) 1,7 1,6 2,0 2,2 2,3

NH4 (µM) 125 283 65 144 1437

GPP (µM/h) 6999 11943 5577 7264 8268

R (µM/h) -2639 -3594 -4550 -4764 -4513

Holothuria fed Holothuria non fedLong dry-outNew sediment

Environmental characteristics of the sediment at the beginning of the experiment

Page 17: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Classic dry-out

pH 6,87 7,15 7,33 7,21 6,84

Redox (mV) 68,1 18,3 19,0 24,1 41,9

Chl a (mg/m²) 16,6 66,8 119,7 120,5 147,2

OM (%) 1,7 1,6 2,0 2,2 2,3

NH4 (µM) 125 283 65 144 1437

GPP (µM/h) 6999 11943 5577 7264 8268

R (µM/h) -2639 -3594 -4550 -4764 -4513

Holothuria fed Holothuria non fedLong dry-outNew sediment

pH

6,20

6,60

7,00

7,40

7,80

New sediment Long dry-out Holothuria non fed Holothuria fed Classic dry-out

T0 T1 T2 T3 T4

Page 18: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Classic dry-out

pH 6,87 7,15 7,33 7,21 6,84

Redox (mV) 68,1 18,3 19,0 24,1 41,9

Chl a (mg/m²) 16,6 66,8 119,7 120,5 147,2

OM (%) 1,7 1,6 2,0 2,2 2,3

NH4 (µM) 125 283 65 144 1437

GPP (µM/h) 6999 11943 5577 7264 8268

R (µM/h) -2639 -3594 -4550 -4764 -4513

Holothuria fed Holothuria non fedLong dry-outNew sediment

NH4

-1000,00

0,00

1000,00

2000,00

3000,00

4000,00

New sediment Long dry-out Holothuria non fed Holothuria fed Classic dry-out

µmol.l-1 T0 T1 T2 T3 T4

Page 19: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Classic dry-out

pH 6,87 7,15 7,33 7,21 6,84

Redox (mV) 68,1 18,3 19,0 24,1 41,9

Chl a (mg/m²) 16,6 66,8 119,7 120,5 147,2

OM (%) 1,7 1,6 2,0 2,2 2,3

NH4 (µM) 125 283 65 144 1437

GPP (µM/h) 6999 11943 5577 7264 8268

R (µM/h) -2639 -3594 -4550 -4764 -4513

Holothuria fed Holothuria non fedLong dry-outNew sediment

Shrimp survival rates et the end of the experiment

80%

90%

100%

New sediment Long dry-out Holothuria non fed Holothuria fed Classic dry-out

Page 20: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Food conversion ratio

1,00

1,50

2,00

2,50

New sediment Long dry-out Holothuria non fed Holothuria fed Classic dry-out

Shrimp survival rates et the end of the experiment

80%

90%

100%

New sediment Long dry-out Holothuria non fed Holothuria fed Classic dry-out

Final weights

15,0

16,0

17,0

18,0

New sediment Long dry-out Holothuria non fed Holothuria fed Classic dry-out

g

Very similar zootechnical performances between the treatments

Page 21: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Conclusion:

Holothuria farming:

Production performances:

Feeding might ameliorate growth rate but did not allow to outcome the system carrying capacity.

Lower density permitted much better zootechnical performances.

Bioremediation:

Feeding led to an enrichment of the system.

No clear differences between the control and the non fed treatment.

Shrimp farming:

Bioremediation:

The sediment characteristics were mainly influence by the dry out time.

For similar dry out time, rotational culture presented cleaner sediments.

Production performances:

Zootechnical performances were comparable between the treatments.

Page 22: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Perspectives:

•We are analyzing Isotopes and fatty acid data

Identify the food sources of H. scabra during the experiment.

Find a more adapted aliment.

“Bioremediation?”

•Make medium scale zootechnical experiment of H.scabra farming.

•Co culture with other species (fish…) appear as the most attractive scenario.

Page 23: Rotational culture of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra with the shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris: trade-off between growth performance and bioremediation,

Thank you.

FAMB