Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ROOSEVELT IRRIGATION DISTRICT EARLY RESPONSE ACTION
INFORMATION MEETING FOR PROJECT DELIVERY SOLICITATION
September 21, 2010
MEETING AGENDA
INTRODUCTIONS
TECHNICAL OVERVIEW OF ERA
LEGAL OVERVIEW OF ERA
STATUS OF ERA IMPLEMENTATION
PROJECT PLANNING AND DELIVERY
OPEN DISCUSSIONS AND QUESTIONS
2
Slide 2
PROJECT INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION OF RID PROJECT TEAM
– ROOSEVELT IRRIGATION DISTRICT • STAN ASHBY – RID SUPERINTENDENT
– GALLAGHER & KENNEDY – LEGAL SUPPORT • DAVID P. KIMBALL, III
– SYNERGY ENVIRONMENTAL – TECHNICAL SUPPORT • DENNIS SHIRLEY, RG; JOEL PETERSON, PE
– EUSI – PROJECT DELIVERY • PAUL HENDRICKS
– LAWRENCE MOORE & ASSOCIATES – PUBLIC OUTREACH • LAWRENCE MOORE, PHD
3
Slide 3
COMMUNICATIONS
MEDIA RELATIONS
4
Slide 4
COMMUNITY RELATIONS
PUBLIC OUTREACH
www.wvgroundwater.org
PROJECT INTRODUCTION
WEST VAN BUREN AREA (WVBA) WATER QUALITY ASSURANCE REVOLVING FUND (WQARF) SITE
VOLUNTARY EARLY RESPONSE ACTION (ERA) BEING IMPLEMENTED BY ROOSEVELT IRRIGATION DISTRICT (RID)
LARGE-SCALE PUMP & TREAT: ~ 20K GPM CAPACITY, LIQUID-PHASE GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON (GAC)
REMOVING VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCS), PRIMARILY PCE, TCE AND 1,1-DCE
NEW PIPELINES: 6 ALIGNMENTS, ~ 5.4 MILES TOTAL
ADDITIONAL PROJECT DETAIL IN THE ERA WORK PLAN ( www.wvgroundwater.org )
5
Slide 5
OVERVIEW OF RID
6
Slide 6
RID FORMED IN THE 1920S TO SERVE CUSTOMERS IN THE WEST VALLEY RID OPERATES 104 WELLS AND ~50 MILES OF CANALS/LATERALS RID HAS RIGHTS TO PUMP IN EXCESS OF 150,000 AF/YR EAST OF THE AGUA FRIA
RID RELIES PRINCIPALLY ON GROUNDWATER BUT ALSO USES RECLAIMED WASTEWATER
OVERVIEW OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
7
Slide 7
Estimated Extent of VOC Contamination
WIDESPREAD CONTAMINATION BY VOCS, DISCOVERED IN THE 1980S ~ 15 MILE LONG COMINGLED PLUME, WESTERN HALF IMPACTING RID EASTERN PART OF PLUME BEING ADDRESSED THROUGH EPA-LEAD ACTION
EPA-Lead
ADEQ-Lead
West Central Phoenix WQARF Site ADEQ-Lead
WVBA WQARF Site
OVERVIEW OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION (CONT.)
8
Slide 8
Motorola 52nd Street – 3 Operable Units (OUs) Pump & treat systems in operation @ OU1 & OU2 OU3 beginning Feasibility Study process to define remedy
PRP PRP PRP
PRP
OVERVIEW OF WVBA WQARF SITE
9
Slide 9
Van Buren Avenue
VOC PLUME
OU-3
> 50,000 gpm
Van Buren Street
Threatened Wells Impacted Wells
Pipe/Canal
OVERVIEW OF ERA
10
WEST CENTRAL PHOENIX
WQARF SITE
Van Buren Street
Estimated Extent of VOC Contamination
32 RID Wells in the Vicinity 21 RID Wells Contaminated by VOCs 17 RID Wells Exceed VOC Standards
RID Salt Canal
NEW TREATMENT FACILITY • Centralized Plant at RID Property • Treatment by Activated Carbon • Remove VOCs from Water and Air
PUMP & TREAT ~20,000 gpm VOC MASS REMOVAL ~ 5,700 pounds/year
Slide 10
OVERVIEW OF ERA (CONT.)
DESCRIPTION OF INDIVIDUAL ERA ELEMENTS
• CENTRAL GROUNDWATER TREATMENT FACILITY (CGTF)
20,000 GPM CAPACITY FED BY 48-INCH PIPELINE FROM SALT CANAL
GRAVITY FLOW INTO WET WELL/GRIT CHAMBERS PUMP STATION
PREFILTRATION
GAC CONTACTORS BACKWASH SYSTEM
FINISHED WATER STORAGE TANK BACKWASH PUMP STATION WASTE EQUALIZATION TANK
INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS
DISCHARGE STRUCTURE TO MAIN CANAL
11
Slide 11
OVERVIEW OF ERA (CONT.)
SITE OF CENTRAL GROUNDWATER TREATMENT FACILITY RID MAINTENANCE YARD 8490 W. VAN BUREN STREET
12
Slide 12 From: ERA Work Plan - Appendix A
~ 4 Acres Available RID Main Canal
NW Corner of W. Van Buren St. and the Main Canal (~84th Ave.), Tolleson
OVERVIEW OF ERA (CONT.)
DESCRIPTION OF INDIVIDUAL ERA ELEMENTS (CONT.)
• ENCLOSE OPEN SECTIONS OF SALT CANAL – 2 SECTIONS REMAIN FOR A TOTAL LENGTH OF ~ 1500 FT., 48-INCH REPLACEMENT PIPING
• INVESTIGATION OF CONDITIONS OF ERA WELLS – EVALUATE CONDUIT POTENTIAL, GENERAL CONDITIONS/NEED FOR REHABILITATION
• WELL HEAD MODIFICATIONS – UPGRADE INSTRUMENTATION &CONTROLS, MODIFY DISCHARGE TO MINIMIZE VOLATILIZATION
• EXTENSION OF SALT CANAL - FROM CURRENT TERMINUS TO CGTF
• EXTRACTION NETWORK PIPING ADDITIONS – NEW PIPELINES TO CONNECT HIGH-VOC WELLS NORTH TO SALT CANAL (AND CGTF) AND SHUNT LOW-VOC WELLS SOUTH TO THE MAIN CANAL
13
Slide 13
OVERVIEW OF ERA (CONT.)
COST SCHEDULE BY TASK ELEMENT
14
Slide 14
RID Early Response Action Tasks Draft Implementation Cost Schedule
2010 2011 2012 2013
Task Sub-Total Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Task # Task Name
2.0 Project Management/ADEQ Coordination --- --- 90 75 75 75 75 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 $750
2.1 Health Exposure Assessment & Mitigation --- --- 15 25 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- $40
2.2 Well Investigations --- --- 50 220 200 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- $470
2.3 Groundwater Modeling --- --- 100 110 30 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- $240
2.4 Engineering Design Study --- --- 25 75 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- $100
2.5 Groundwater Monitoring/Data Management --- --- 35 115 65 --- 65 15 65 --- 65 15 65 --- 65 $570
2.6 Well Modifications --- --- --- --- --- --- 180 775 355 --- 100 200 130 --- -- $1,740
2.7 Well Volatilization Controls --- --- --- --- --- --- 260 260 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- $520
2.8 Salt/Main Canal Enclosure --- --- --- --- --- 135 615 120 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- $870
2.9 Salt Canal Extension to CGTF --- --- --- --- --- 60 355 600 575 -- --- --- --- --- --- $1,590
2.10 Central Groundwater Treatment Facility --- --- --- --- --- 20 400 800 3,350 5,150 6,075 3,050 1,430 350 --- $20,625
2.11 Phase 2 Extraction Well Piping --- --- --- --- --- 120 240 1,680 1,580 1,560 1,500 600 205 --- --- $7,485
Summary of ERA Tasks $0 $0 $290 $570 $445 $410 $2,190 $4,295 $5,970 $6,755 $7,785 $3,910 $1,875 $395 $110 $35,000
(All Values in $1,000s)
OVERVIEW OF ERA (CONT.)
THIS IS THE ERA AS APPROVED
RID WILL CONSIDER OPPORTUNITIES FOR COST REDUCTIONS
VALUE ENGINEERING DURING THE DESIGN PROCESS
RID WILL CONSIDER ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
15
Slide 15
TECHNICAL OVERVIEW OF ERA
OTHER TECHNICAL ISSUES/DETAILS
NO HAZARDOUS WASTES ANTICIPATED
SPENT GAC CLASSIFIED AND MANAGED AS NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE WHEN SENT FOR REGENERATION AND REUSE
MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVELS (MCLS) ARE THE CLEAN-UP STANDARDS FOR THIS ERA. THE MCLS FOR TCE AND PCE, THE PRINCIPAL WVBA CONTAMINANTS, ARE LIKELY TO DECREASE (FROM 5 TO 1 PPB)
ESTIMATED INFLUENT VOC CONCENTRATIONS TO TREATMENT: TCE ………. 20 TO 40 PPB PCE ………. 8 TO 10 PPB 1,1-DCE ….. 2 TO 5 PPB
16
Slide 16
LEGAL OVERVIEW OF ERA
OCTOBER 5, 2009 – RID SUBMITTED ERA WORK PLAN TO ADEQ FOR APPROVAL
OCTOBER 8, 2009 – RID/ADEQ AGREEMENT TO CONDUCT WORK REQUIRING RID TO SUBMIT AND CONDUCT AN ERA
FEBRUARY 3, 2010 – RID SUBMITTED REVISED ERA WORK PLAN TO ADEQ ADDRESSING ADEQ COMMENTS
17
Slide 17
LEGAL OVERVIEW OF ERA
ERA IS AUTHORIZED UNDER STATE LAW IF NECESSARY TO ADDRESS ANY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:
1. CURRENT RISK TO PUBLIC HEALTH, WELFARE AND THE ENVIRONMENT,
2. PROTECTING A WATER SUPPLY, 3. PROVIDING A WATER SUPPLY, 4. CONTROLLING CONTAMINATION TO REDUCE SCOPE OR COST OF
FINAL REMEDY, OR 5. SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION
A.A.C. R18-16-405.A
RID’S REVISED ERA ADDRESSES 4 OF THE 5 AUTHORIZING CRITERIA
18
Slide 18
LEGAL OVERVIEW OF ERA
ALL ARIZONA “REMEDIAL ACTIONS” (INCLUDING ERAS) MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
1. WATER QUANTITY PROTECTION (A.R.S. 49-282.06.B.4.b)
2. WATER QUALITY PROTECTION (A.R.S. 49-282.06.A.2, B.4.b)
3. FAIL SAFE TREATMENT SYSTEM DESIGN (A.A.C. R18-16-411.C)
4. MITIGATE POLLUTANT TRANSFER (ADEQ POLICY AND MARICOPA COUNTY RULE)
19
Slide 19
LEGAL OVERVIEW OF ERA
ADEQ SHALL APPROVE AN AUTHORIZED ERA IF IT IS:
1. NECESSARY,
2. COST EFFECTIVE,
3. REASONABLE, AND
4. TECHNICALLY FEASIBLE
A.R.S. 49-282.06.A.3 A.A.C. R18-16-405.I, H.1
20
Slide 20
LEGAL OVERVIEW OF ERA
JUNE 24, 2010 – RID’S REVISED ERA APPROVED BY ADEQ
STATE LAW – COSTS INCURRED TO IMPLEMENT STATE-APPROVED “REMEDIAL ACTIONS” (INCLUDING ERAS) ARE RECOVERABLE AGAINST POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTIES (PRPS).
(A.R.S. 49-285.B)
FEDERAL LAW – COSTS INCURRED IN RESPONSE TO A “RELEASE” OR “THREATENED RELEASE” OF A “HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE” TO THE ENVIRONMENT ARE RECOVERABLE AGAINST ANY PRP.
(CERCLA § 107)
FEDERAL LAW IMPOSES “JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY” ON EACH PRP
21
Slide 21
LEGAL OVERVIEW OF ERA
CERCLA 107 COST RECOVERY ACTION – BURDEN OF PROOF
1. “OWNER” OR “OPERATOR” …
2. … OF A “FACILITY” …
3. … WHERE A “RELEASE” OR “THREATENED RELEASE” OF A “HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE” HAS OCCURRED …
4. … FOR WHICH “RESPONSE COSTS” HAVE BEEN INCURRED “CONSISTENT WITH THE NATIONAL CONTINGENCY PLAN.”
ELEMENTS 1 – 3 ESTABLISHED BY PUBLIC OR NON-CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND SAMPLING DATA
ELEMENT 4 ESTABLISHED BY A STATE-APPROVED REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN (INCLUDING ERA)
22
Slide 22
LEGAL OVERVIEW OF ERA
1. CERCLA 107 COST RECOVERY ACTION FILED:
A. FEBRUARY 9, 2010 – ORIGINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST 80+ PRPS (NOT SERVED)
B. JULY 23, 2010 – FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AGAINST 60+ PRPS (SERVED)
2. PRP RESPONSES DUE OCTOBER 25, 2010
3. RID MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO BE FILED – SEEKING JUDICIAL DECLARATION THAT DEFENDANT’S ARE JOINT AND SEVERALLY LIABLE PRPS UNDER CERCLA § 107 FOR THE COSTS INCURRED BY RID TO IMPLEMENT THE STATE-APPROVED ERA.
23
Slide 23
STATUS OF ERA IMPLEMENTATION
ERA WORK PLAN APPROVED BY ADEQ ON JUNE 24, 2010
ADEQ REQUIRED 4 TASKS TO BE CONDUCTED IN ADDITION TO THE TASKS SPECIFIED IN THE ERA WORK PLAN TASK 1 – PUBLIC HEALTH THREAT ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – WELL INVESTIGATIONS TASK 3 – GROUNDWATER MODELING TASK 4 – ENGINEERING DESIGN STUDY
SCOPING MEETINGS HELD WITH ADEQ ON 7/13, 7/22, AND 8/5 TO CLARIFY TASK SCOPES
24
Slide 24
STATUS OF ERA IMPLEMENTATION
RID SUBMITTED TASK 1 AND TASK 2 WORK PLANS AND APPROVAL BY ADEQ IS PENDING
RID PROPOSED AN AMENDED SCHEDULE AND SCOPE TO ADEQ IN ORDER TO …
EXPEDITE IMPLEMENTATION BY ACCELERATING MODELING TASK
ADD GROUNDWATER MONITORING/DATA MANAGEMENT TASK
ADEQ RESPONSE TO AMENDED SCHEDULE AND SCOPE REQUEST IS STILL PENDING
25
Slide 25
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING AND DELIVERY
PLANNING AND PROCUREMENT TREATMENT AND CONVEYANCE FACILITIES FOR A GROUNDWATER
REMEDIATION PROJECT WELL REHABILITATION MAY BE INCLUDED IN THIS PROCUREMENT –
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR WELL MODIFICATIONS AND GROUNDWATER MODELING IS BEING PROVIDED BY OTHERS
POTENTIAL FOR PROCUREMENT TO EXTEND TO THE FINAL REMEDY
INTENDING TO PROCURE ALTERNATIVE DELIVERY SERVICES UNDER THE GUIDELINES OF A.R.S. TITLE 34, CHAPTER 6
TRADITIONAL PROJECT DELIVERY HAS NOT BEEN RULED OUT
PROCUREMENT PROCESS IS SCHEDULED TO BE COMPLETED IN THE NEXT 6 – 9 MONTHS
26
Slide 26
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING AND DELIVERY
GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION PROJECT PLAN, PERMIT, DESIGN, CONSTRUCT, AND COMMISSION A LIQUID-
PHASE GAC TREATMENT FACILITY
FINANCING, OWNERSHIP, LONG-TERM OPERATION, AND TRANSFER WILL ALSO BE CONSIDERED WITHIN THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS
ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND VALUE-BASED PROJECT DELIVERY WILL BE CONSIDERED IN THE SELECTION METHODOLOGY
ERA IS PLANNED FOR TWENTY THOUSAND (20,000) GPM
COST ESTIMATES: $35,000,000 CAPITAL COSTS $ 4,000,000 ANNUAL ONGOING O&M COSTS (ANTICIPATING 50+ YEARS OF OPERATION)
27
Slide 27
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING AND DELIVERY
FINANCING OPTIONS: THE PROJECT MAY BENEFIT FROM INTERIM, BRIDGE, OR LONG-TERM
FINANCING, OR PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP
INTERIM OR BRIDGE FINANCING COSTS THAT HAVE BEEN INCURRED TO DATE AND TO IMPLEMENT THE
APPROVED ERA UNTIL COSTS ARE RECOVERED FROM PRPS
LONG-TERM FINANCING PROVIDES AN OPTION FOR INTERESTED PARTIES THAT HAVE A BUSINESS
MODEL WHICH PROVIDES FOR PROJECT FINANCING AND VARIOUS OWNERSHIP ELEMENTS
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (P3) RID UNDERSTANDS THAT THIS PROJECT MAY BE A CANDIDATE FOR A
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP
28
Slide 28
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING AND DELIVERY
PROCUREMENT PROCESS OPTIONS: ONE-STEP RFQ PROCESS – DESIGN BUILD OR CONSTRUCTION
MANAGER AT RISK
TWO-STEP RFP PROCESS – DEVELOP SHORT LIST OF QUALIFIED ENTITIES, DETAILED COST BASED SUBMITTALS, FOLLOWED BY SELECTION
TRADITIONAL DESIGN, BID, BUILD, OPERATE – SELECT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR DESIGN AND BID CONSTRUCTION
29
Slide 29
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING AND DELIVERY
RID WILL BE SEEKING INPUT FROM INTERESTED PARTIES DURING THE NEXT STEP OF THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS
ONE-ON-ONE MEETING OPPORTUNITIES
ONE (1) OR TWO (2) HOUR LONG MEETINGS TO DISCUSS PROJECT PROCUREMENT OPTIONS AND PROJECT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS THAT WILL ADD PROJECT VALUE
SIGN-UP SHEET AT THE REGISTRATION TABLE OR THROUGH THE WEB SITE VIA EMAIL ([email protected])
30
Slide 30
OPEN DISCUSSIONS - QUESTIONS
31
Slide 31
QUESTIONS/COMMENTS?