7/28/2019 Romanian Oldest Europan Language
1/2
Romanians, Ruman and not Roman. Why do they call so? Because
RU-MANI,RA-
MANI, RO-MANI, API, APULI, DACI and MAN-DA , VAL-AH are
allsynonymsexpressing the person from the river banc or from the
river valley.APII could be found
under the form of mez-APPI in the ancient Italy, under hesame
name as the APPULI
Dacians. APU-GLIA, (or Glia Romanilor inRomanian - Romanian
land) can be foundwith this meaning only in Romanian(Glia= land)In
the Southern side of Italian "booth"
exists the first neolitical site of Italy andit is called
MOL-feta. The name itself has
Romanian names, according to GuidoA. Manselli: MOL-tzam (popular
Thank you),MUL-tumire (satisfaction), na-MOL (mud); MOL-dova
(province and river in Romania,
Za-MOL-xis, Daciandivinity. Manselli said that this
archaeological sit is 7,000 years old
and has abalcanic feature.I came up with this topic just to hear
decent opinions and not
banalities likethose of a few days ago when while surfing for a
language forum, I read allkindof suburban interventions. This topic
is for people whith brain only.As a German
myself, I was pure and simple stunned by the
childishcommentaries regarding German
Language given by some individuals,yesterday. I hope, I won't
generate anything like that
today...if that will happen,I sugest to the moderators to delete
it.What do you think, areyou ready to take the challenge and carry
on a nicediscussion on this topic or I have to
look for another place for it?What do you say about these new
(for me - although thetheory appears to beknown for long time - it
has been said that Vatican preserves some
secrets aboutthe origins of us all - information obtained in the
moment of St Sofia
churchdevastation, in Constantinople, when the churches
separation took place).JoshLalonde Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:06 pm GMTThis
is pseudo-science. Romanian descends
from Vulgar Latin and is thereforeno older than French, Spanish,
Italian, etc.Rudiger Thu
Jan 03, 2008 10:06 pm GMTOk, but how do you explain the
similarities between
Sanskrit and Romanian?How do you explain the existence of the
old written plates, (theage expertisewas done by specialists by
using the latest techniques)?
I'm afraid, it is too simple to say it is only pseudo-science!
When Herodotussaid that,approximated cite: " after the nation of
Indians, the Thracians are themost numerous
people in the world" how could they and their language,disappear
so quick?
Then, when the from the former Dacia (which was almost in the
samelimits as the actual
Romania) was occupied by the Romans only 14%, howcould the
biggest majority ofpeople , the free Thracians learn the
vulgarLatin so fast, in only 200 years ?Britain was
under Romans for over 400 years and that latinisation'wonder"
never took place. It must
bee something more than that.I"m sorry but I can not resume
myself at such a simple explanation - pseudo-science! I
don't believe in Thracians extermination when I know for the
fact thatthey where fierce
worriors, against whom the ersten Deutschen have suffered alot.
Read "die erstenDeustchen" and
see there how dangerous was to fail inconflict with the
Thracians.I don't believe that
these guys who hated so much the Romans because of country
occupation, would acceptto learn and speak their language
.There is a lot of scientific work out there and so many proves
which simpledon't make
sense considering the actual Romanians the result of Romans
andThracians combination.
The Thracians in that time where so many that they could rise an
armies of 200,000 man.
7/28/2019 Romanian Oldest Europan Language
2/2
Not even the Romans could put together so many people on a front
line...That's an
enigma for me!JLK Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:06 pm GMTRespectfully,
what do
archaeological digs have to do with languages? There arenative
American artifacts thatpredate anything in Europe by thousands of
years. Is English now the oldest European
language? And realistically, whocares which European language is
the oldest? God
knows it isn't Romanian,anyways. The only people I've met who
believe that are afundamentalist lot of Romanian nationalist. I
find it very odd that a "German" is talking
about this...Josh Lalonde Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:09 pm GMT
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languages Rudiger Fri
Jan 04, 2008 2:38 am
GMTJLK,
Who cares anything about any language then if I had to follow
your way of thinking?Itwas just a simple topic and nothing else.I
don't understand why are you so irritated by
that.I'm sorry, I understood too late that your are not ready
for a discussion
aboutlanguages.And why is odd to be a german and discuss about
Romanian?I really
don't understand you and if you cannot overcome
potensiallresentiments which you mighthave against Romanians (or
maybe germans, Idon't know), we can not have any
conversation therefore, the only thing I cansay is that it was
only my fault coming on thisforum and I deeply regret it!Good bye
and have a happy new year!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languageshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languages
