Upload
lykhuong
View
217
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IEA © OECD/IEA 2017
Role of clean energy in the context of
Paris Agreement
Peter Janoska, Energy Analyst, IEA
COP 23, Bonn, 15 November 2017
© IEA 2017
The IEA works around the world to support an
accelerated clean energy transitions that is
enabled by real-world SOLUTIONS
supported by ANALYSIS
and built on DATA
© OECD/IEA 2017
Global CO2 emissions flat for 3 years – an emerging trend?
IEA analysis shows that global CO2 emissions remained flat in 2016 for the third year in a row, even
though the global economy grew, led by emission declines in the US and China.
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2014 2015 2016
Gt
Global energy-related CO2 emissions
© OECD/IEA 2017
0
10
20
30
40
2014 2020 2030 2040 2050
GtC
O2
Efficiency 40%
Renewables 35%
Fuel switching 5%
Nuclear 6%
CCS 14%
How far can technology take us?
Pushing energy technology to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060
could meet the mid-point of the range of ambitions expressed in Paris
Technology area contribution to global cumulative CO2 reductions
Efficiency 40%
Renewables35%Fuel switching5%Nuclear 6%
CCS 14%
Efficiency 34%
Renewables 15%
Fuel switching 18%
Nuclear 1%
CCS 32%
Global CO2 reductions by technology area
2 degrees Scenario – 2DS
Reference Technology Scenario – RTS
Beyond 2 degrees Scenario – B2DS
0 200 400
Gt CO2 cumulative reductions in 2060
© OECD/IEA 2017
The potential of clean energy technology remains under-utilised
Recent progress in some clean energy areas is promising, but many technologies still need a strong
push to achieve their full potential and deliver a sustainable energy future.
Energy storage Solar PV and onshore wind
Building construction
Nuclear Transport – Fuel economy of light-duty vehicles
Lighting, appliances and building equipment
Electric vehicles
Energy-intensive industrial processes
Transport biofuels
Carbon capture and storage More efficient coal-fired power
●Not on track
●Accelerated improvement needed
●On track
© OECD/IEA 2017
Can we push up the low-carbon power deployment pace?
Average capacity additions in different periods in the B2DS
Recent successes in solar and wind
will have to be extended to all low-carbon solutions, and brought to a scale never experienced before.
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Last Decade
Last year
2017-2030
2030-2060
GW per year
Fossil CCS (Incl.BECCS) Nuclear Hydro Wind Solar PV Other renewables
© OECD/IEA 2017
: Power sector example
The average carbon intensity of new power capacity needs be at around 100 grammes of CO2 per kilowatt
hour (gCO2/kWh) in 2025 and close to zero gCO2/kWh by 2050, requiring further steep reduction.
Power Generation
23%
Oil & Gas 46%
Coal 4%
Electricity Networks
14%
Energy Efficiency
12%
Thermal Power
7%
Global fleet average and new-build plants emissions intensity of power generation in
IEA scenarios
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
gCO
2/kW
h
Historic
2DS average
2DS new build
Indicators of energy system transformation
© OECD/IEA 2017
The future is electric
Electricity becomes on a global level the largest final energy carrier in the 2DS and B2DS, with the electricity
share in final energy use more than doubling compared to today, up to 41% in the B2DS in 2060.
0
10 000
20 000
30 000
40 000
50 000
1971 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
TW
h
Statistics
RTS
2DS
B2DS
Global final electricity demand Change in final electricity demand in 2060
-8 000
-6 000
-4 000
-2 000
0
2 000
4 000
6 000
8 000
2DS vs RTS B2DS vs 2DS
TWh
Transport
Agriculture
Services
Residential
Industry
© OECD/IEA 2017
The fuel mix to generate electricity is vastly different to today
The average carbon intensity of power generation falls from around 520 gCO2/kWh today to
Below zero in the B2DS
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
RTS 2DS B2DS
2014 2060
Ele
ctri
city
mix
Fossil w/o CCS Fossil with CCS Nuclear Bioenergy with CCS Renewables
© OECD/IEA 2017
Nuclear additions need to double current rate to meet 2DS contributions
2016 saw the highest nuclear capacity additions since 1990, but new construction starts down sharply
Capacity additions and reactors under construction
© OECD/IEA 2017
0
10
20
30
40
2012 2015
USD
(2
01
6)
bill
ion
Private Public Top 3 firms
0
10
20
30
40
2012 2015
USD
(2
01
6)
bill
ion
Private Public Top 3 firms
Global clean energy RD&D spending needs a strong boost
Global RD&D spending in efficiency, renewables, nuclear and CCS plateaued at $26 billion annually,
coming mostly from governments.
Global clean energy RD&D spending
0
10
20
30
40
2012 2021
USD
(2
01
6)
bill
ion
Private Public Top 3 firms
Mission Innovation
Mission Innovation
Top 3 IT company R&D spenders
Global RD&D spending in efficiency, renewables, nuclear and CCS plateaued at $26 billion annually,
coming mostly from governments.
Mission Innovation could provide a much needed boost.
© OECD/IEA 2017
Global RD&D spending in efficiency, renewables, nuclear and CCS plateaued at $26 billion annually,
coming mostly from governments.
Public and private sector invest in different type of innovation.
Public spending supports technologies that are further from the market or have high development and
demonstration costs, including nuclear, CCS and ocean energy.
Tap all the potential: Complementary public and private RD&D is needed
IEA member country spending in 2016 Venture Capital investment breakdown for 2016 Energy efficiency (except transport)
CCS
Solar
Wind
Geothermal
Bioenergy
Transport
Hydro and marine
Nuclear
Hydrogen and fuel cells
Energy storage
Other
© OECD/IEA 2017
Conclusions
• Early signs point to changes in energy trajectories, helped by
policies and technologies, but progress is too slow
• An integrated systems approach considering all technology
options must be implemented now to accelerate progress
• Each country should define its own transition path and scale-
up its RD&D and deployment support accordingly
• Achieving carbon neutrality by 2060 would require
unprecedented technology policies and investments
• Innovation can deliver, but needs long term technology
investment prioritisation across both public and private sectors
© OECD/IEA 2017
www.iea.org IEA www.iea.org/statistics