Roger Taylor Biological ORMUS Responses to an ORMUS Preparation and to Singlet Oxygen Therapy as Shown by Computerised Kirlian Technique

pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

RESPONSES TO AN ORMUS PREPARATION,AND TO SINGLET OXYGEN THERAPY,

AS SHOWN BY A COMPUTERISED KIRLIANTECHNIQUE

by Dr. Roger Taylor

This technique, called Gas-Discharge Visualisation (GDV), was developed by Dr Konstantin Korotkov of St.Petersburg (see websites http://www.kti.spb.ru in Russia, and http://www.gdvresearch.com in the US). The fingersare placed individually on a glass electrode, to which is supplied a high voltage high frequency pulse. Light from theresulting electric discharge through the air around the finger is picked up by a CCD camera, and the digitised imagesent to the computer. Immediately below are examples of the images which are sent to the computer.


The image above shows the change in a single finger after (a) ormus, and(b) singlet oxygen. What is mainly evident is the change in area; the other

parameters are less obvious.


The examples above show the appearance when images from

all ten fingers are arranged around a "manikin" so as to look like an aura.The numbers at the bottom represent measured changes in area.

This is shown for the ormus response only.

The imformation from this type of image is digitized and run through a computer program for interpretation. Thesoftware allows quantitative analysis of a number of parameters, and so permits objective comparisons to be made.


I had been on a water-trap ormus preparation (Rhodium/Gold) [from Mountain Manna] for several months. In order totest my response I stopped taking it for 5 days, and then took a large dose (about 6x the recommended daily dose).GDV readings were taken just before, and at intervals after this dose.

GRAPH A

In Graph A, the green line represents the area of the image averaged over all ten fingers. An increase in this quantity


("expansion of the aura") is most generally indicative of health. Light blue represents brightness: increase is a goodsign if it is together with increased area, but may indicate stress if it occurs at the expense of area. Dark bluerepresents fractality of the border, and red represents so-called "noise": the area of the image in fragments less than30 pixels. Both of these should ideally be low. It can be seen that the response reaches maximum in about 5 hours,and then dies away by the next day.

Singlet Oxygen Therapy was developed by Tony Van der Valk (see his website http://www.polyvalk.com). Air passesfirst through water, so as to be saturated with water vapour, and then passes a red (634nm) LED that shines on aphthalocyanine compound. This catalyses the conversion of atmospheric oxygen to the extremely reactive singletoxygen. The singlet oxygen immediately donates its energy to the water vapour, which can then be breathed througha loose nasal cannula. The energy is of a grade high enough (about 1 eV) to generate light in the body. None of theusual biochemical reactions can reach such an energy. It thus performs the same function as the other OxygenRadicals, which are obtained normally with negative ions, UV light, etc., and can be therapeutically supplied byozone, hydrogen peroxide, etc. Tony Van der Valk's method is, however, more effective, more convenient and saferthan these last. The question of the essential function of Oxygen Radicals has been thoroughly researched by Prof.Vladimir Voekov (V.L. Voekov and V.L. Naletov: "Weak Photon Emission of Non-Linear Chemical Reactions ofAmino Acids and Sugars in Aqueous Solutions". 1998 . In Biophotons: J.-J. Chang, J. Fisch and F.-A. Popp Eds.Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht pp. 93-108) and the fundamental role of light energy in the maintenance ofquantum wholeness in the living organism has been researched by Dr Fritz Popp, and many other authors over thelast thirty years (see Dr Mae-Wan Ho's excellent book "The Rainbow and the Worm", World Scientific, 2nd Ed.1998).

I have been taking Singlet Oxygen Therapy (15 min twice per week) for about two years, with considerable benefit tomy energy. The GDV test was done after 6 days without taking it. After the initial reading, I took a 20 min treatment,and then took further readings at intervals.


GRAPH B

Graph B (on singlet oxygen) shows a good response, similar to Graph A, except that the peak and subsequentdecline were reached somewhat earlier.

I suggest that these therapies may be mutually complementary. Thus one may require sufficient superconductivity inthe system before the light energy can be properly utilised. It may be relevant that considerable light energy is known


to be stored in the living organism in the form of electronic excitations, and that Fritz Popp has evidence that it ismostly stored in the DNA.

Following are Roger Taylor's responses to the Survey for "Regular (self-defined) ORMUS users", self-assessed:

My ormus usage is:1. trap water

By Regular I mean:1. Daily

My overall physical health is:2. good

My infectious disease occurrences are:2. Rarely - but on the rare occasion when I get a cold I have a lung infection.

My level of degenerative type disease for my age is:2. Very few degenerative diseases, compared to others my age. Age 73: chronic bronchitis of 8 years standing.

My overall physical health since becoming a "regular ormus user" has:2. Somewhat improved

Please add any significant comments:My energy had already been restored before starting ormus, due to taking singlet oxygen therapy for 2 years.Otherwise I might have seen more response to ormus.

Documents

Roger Taylor Biological ORMUS Responses to an ORMUS Preparation and to Singlet Oxygen Therapy as Shown by Computerised Kirlian Technique