Robert M L BAKER, Jr. and Bonnie S. BAKER Transportation Sciences Corporation and GravWave LLC 8123 Tuscany Avenue, Playa del Rey, CA 90293 No coaxial cables No satellite transponders No microwave relays No underwater cables Communication link Signal to noise ratio How gravitational waves are generated Superradiance Double-helix cylindrical array for HFGW generation MEMS FBARs system that solves the transmitter difficulty Three already built HFGW detectors without sufficient sensitivity The Chinese & US HFGW research teams The Li-Baker HFGW detector that solves the receiver difficulty Typical Communications Link Signal-to-Noise Ratio Change in Centrifugal Force of Orbiting Masses, f cf, Creates Gravitational Wave (GW) Radiation Peanut-shaped GW radiation pattern calculated by Landau and Lifshitz (1975) GW Flux Growth Analogous to Stack of N Orbital Planes Beam narrows with more radiation elements such that beam cap area proportional to 1/N. GW intensity proportional to N elements. Thus GW flux proportional intensity divided by cap area or N 2 in Watts per square meter. SCIENCE 325, page 1510: when the atoms (radiators) are close together compared with the wavelength of the radiation Double Helix Array is expected to solve HFGW transmitter difficulty (Patent Pending) Comparison of the General-Relativity based Dehnen Crystal Oscillators generation process with the individual micro-electromechanical systems or MEMS resonators such as film-bulk acoustic resonators or FBARs approach Summary of the HFGW Generation or Transmitter Concept Birmingham University HFGW Detector INFN Genoa HFGW Detector.. The National Astronomical Observatory of Japan 100MHz HFGW Detector. These existing HFGW detectors are not sensitive enough so we turn to the joint Chinese & US HFGW research program. High Frequency Gravitational Wave Research Based upon the new validated Li-effect the Chinese & US HFGW teams have developed the Li-Baker Detector Schematic of the Li-Baker HFGW Detector that is expected to solve the HFGW Receiver Problem (P. R. China Patent No ) Comparative Power Requirements: Two US Power Plants: 3,715,000 MWs 260,000 Cell Towers 1.6 kW per tower: 416 MWs 1,000 one- kilowatt Magnetrons Average: 1 MW Peak: 1 GW Conversion rate of EM power to GW power is exceedingly small: S(1) = (P/4)/(1.71/N) = (1.69 /4) / (1.71/1.5510 13 ) = 3.810 -8 W m --2. Eq. (3). At 1.3x10 7 m (diameter of Earth) distance, then S = 1.33 Wm -2.(conservative; could increase ~ ) and the amplitude A of the HFGW is given by A = 3.8 m/m to ~ m/m. Energizing radiation flux would be 3.210 4 W m -2. But with superradiance produces an actual EM flux of 32 10 9 W m one kW Magnetrons Nevertheless HFGW signal can be detected at an Earths diameter distance Although the best theoretical sensitivity of the Li-Baker HFGW detector is on the order of m/m, its sensitivity can be increased dramatically by introducing superconductor resonance chambers into the interaction volume and a sensitivity of A = can be achieved at the receiver with the HFGW lenses of Woods. Woods HFGW Lenses at the receiver concentrates the signal X Y Z Vacuum / Cryogenic Containment Vessel Microwave Receiver - Detector #2 Microwave Receiver - Detector #1 Gaussian Beam 5GHz Reflectors Resonance Chamber N magnetic pole S magnetic pole HFGW Signal And 5GHz EM Resonance Chamber Geometry is key: X & -X axes = Detectors and resonance chambers Y axis = Magnetic Field Z axis = HFGWs -Z axis = Gaussian Beam X In theory the preferred double-helix array of f-producing MEMS can generate significant HFGW radiation. A numerical example of a 20-meter long array is presented in the paper. Activation-energy radiators (such as off-the-shelf Magnetrons used in Microwave ovens) for MEMS such as Film-Bulk Acoustical Resonators or FBARs (off-the-shelf as used in cell phones) can be utilized and point-to-point communication, even at a distance of the diameter of the Earth, might be realized using the very sensitive HFGW Chinese & US Li-Baker detectors or receivers.