20
Roads Using Enzymes in soil stabilization

Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Roads

Using Enzymes in soil stabilization

Page 2: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Terms Used in Road Construction

Page 3: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Terms Used in Road Construction

Page 4: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard axles). In contrast, main factors controlling deterioration of LVRs (Low Volume Roads) are dominated by the local road environment and details of design (drainage), construction and maintenance practice.

Conventional specs apply to “ideal” materialsStandard methods of test do not always give a

true assessment of performance of local materials

The Challenge faced when dealing with set Engineers:

Page 5: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

“ The art of the roads engineer consists for a good part in utilizing specifications that will make possible the use of materials he finds in the vicinity of the road works.

Unfortunately, force of habit, inadequate specifications and lack of initiative have suppressed the use of local materials and innovative construction technologies”

Consider materials’ “fitness for purpose”Make specification fit materials rather than

materials fit specification (“resource based” specs)

Primary Problem faced:

Page 6: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Pavement Performace:

Page 7: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Material strength derived from combination of:- cohesive effects- soil suction- physio-chemical (stab) forces- inter-particle friction

Material selection influenced by:- traffic loading- environment- material properties (plastic mod)- pavement configuration

Selection of material for construction:

Page 8: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Wide variety of chemical additives available including:Wetting agents to improve compactionHygroscopic salts (e.g. calcium, magnesium or

sodium chlorides)Natural polymers (e.g. ligno sulphonates)Synthetic polymer emulsions (e.g. acrylates)Modified waxesSulphonated oilsBiological enzymes

Page 9: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

CBR versus stiffness

Page 10: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Stiffness versus density

Page 11: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Compaction/density/permeability

Page 12: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Dry density vs Permeability

Page 13: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Dry density vs Stiffness

Page 14: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Benefits of “Compaction to Refusal”

Page 15: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Effect of Surface Deflection on Seal Life

Page 16: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Characteristics of Compaction equipment

Page 17: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Road cross section on builtup

Page 18: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Effect of DZ-1X on PI/CBR of Soil

Untreated soilSoil with DZ-

1X

Page 19: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard
Page 20: Roads. Existing pavement design methods cater to relatively high volumes of traffic with damaging effect quantified in terms of ESA (equivalent standard

Sub-base design chart as per

IRC-37