36 | NewScientist | 1 September 2018

LAST November, a remarkable new species was added to life’s catalogue. The Tapanuli orangutan lives in a small

patch of rainforest on the Indonesian island of Sumatra, a biodiversity hotspot known as the Batang Toru ecosystem. It is just the eighth living species of great ape to be described, besides two previously known orangutans, two gorillas, chimps, bonobos – and us.

But triumph is tinged with tragedy. The entire population of Tapanuli orangutans is thought to be fewer than 800. It instantly became the world’s most endangered great ape. Soon it won’t be endangered any more. It will be extinct.

Right now, bulldozers and chainsaws are tearing into its habitat. By 2022, if things go to plan, the Batang Toru hydroelectric dam will have destroyed 3.6 square kilometres of prime habitat in the middle of the orang’s home. A 13.5-kilometre tunnel will be dug to carry water from the dam. Access roads will be built, power lines laid and part of the valley flooded. “The associated infrastructure will destroy key habitat with the highest density of orangutans,” says Gabriella Fredriksson, founder of the Pro Natura Foundation, a local conservation charity. The dam will send the orangs “spinning towards extinction”, says her colleague Matt Nowak.

The orangutan’s demise is not unstoppable, but the forces that threaten it probably are. The dam is one small piece of a global infrastructure boom that promises to reshape our world over the next decade. This will bring much-needed roads, energy and jobs to some of the world’s poorest people. But it will come at a shocking expense to nature.

The question is: can we do things better?When conservation biologists hear the

word “infrastructure”, they shudder. “It’s the primary force that is peeling back nature and opening the last remaining wild areas like a flayed fish,” says Bill Laurance of James Cook University in Australia. “If you look at everything that is going on environmentally – dwindling wildlife populations, habitat fragmentation, shrinking wilderness areas, protected areas being isolated, poaching and encroaching of biodiversity hotspots – you find that infrastructure is the proximate cause, the first step, in those processes.”

Gouged stripsAnd its effects are profound. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature, which maintains the Red List of Threatened Species, of 13,761 endangered or critically endangered species, 4383 are directly threatened by infrastructure projects of one kind or another. These include residential and commercial development, extractive industries, energy projects and road building.

A further 7500 or so species are at risk from farming, logging, hunting, gathering, trapping and fishing. These are not infrastructure projects per se, but they are enabled by them – especially road building. Cutting a road through a wilderness is like gouging a strip of paint off the surface of a piece of wood: rot gets in and diffuses outwards.

“Roads are the most damaging sort of infrastructure,” says Laurance. “They are the common denominator: you can’t put in a new

Road killThe world is experiencing an unprecedented highway building boom – with untold consequences for the planet’s wildlife, says Graham Lawton

BIODIVERSITY IN CRISIS

Scar on the landscape: This new road cuts through verdant valleys to service a Chinese-funded railway project in Laos

Continued on page 40 >

180901_F_BioInfrastructure.indd 36 24/08/2018 17:52

40 | NewScientist | 1 September 2018

mine or a hydro project or fossil fuels without roads.” They also open frontiers for logging, land clearance, poaching, hunting and illicit drug production. In the Brazilian Amazon, 95 per cent of forest destruction occurs within 5.5 kilometres of a road. Similar levels have been seen in Cambodia, Sumatra, Thailand and Panama. Around 70 per cent of the world’s forests are now less than 1 kilometre from a forest edge.

That creates lots of “edge habitat”, which has different light levels and exposure to the elements from the forest interior, and often ends up with different plant and animal species. Roads also affect biodiversity directly. They restrict the movement of animals, fragment their habitats, expose them to new diseases and chemical and noise pollution, and convert them into road kill. To add insult to injury, they also facilitate the spread of invasive species and clamp the world ever tighter into the vice of fossil fuels.

A recent paper on the risk of road building, co-authored by Laurance, reported that “we are currently witnessing the most dramatic era of road expansion in human history”. The researchers calculated that since 2000, the world’s legal road network has lengthened by 12 million kilometres, enough to encircle the globe 300 times – not including wildcat road building for illegal logging, farming and hunting. Most new roads are in the tropics, where the bulk of the world’s wildlife resides.

For these reasons, conservation biologists

regard infrastructure development as the principal agent of biodiversity decline. An analysis of 35 years of research on habitat fragmentation caused by such development concluded that it reduces biodiversity by anything from 13 to 75 per cent.

But still we build. The Batang Toru dam is part of probably the largest infrastructure programme the world has ever seen: the Chinese-led Belt and Road Initiative, which since it began in 2013 has grown to encompass around 7000 individual projects across 70 countries (see “Belts and roads”, page 38).

That is not the only gigantic infrastructure project in the pipeline, just the biggest of a bad bunch. More than 30 development corridors are planned or being built across Africa, requiring 53,000 kilometres of new road,

much of it in protected areas. South America has its Initiative for the Integration of Regional Infrastructure, which will build roads, pipelines and dams across the Amazon and beyond. Reforms to the US Endangered Species Act will make it easier to build roads in wilderness areas there.

Over the next 30 years, it is estimated that a further 25 million kilometres of road will be built across the world, mostly in the tropics. If these highways all go ahead, the prospects for biodiversity are poor. The tropics will end up looking a bit like Western Europe, with heavily fragmented ecosystems stripped of wildlife.

The story of the Tapanuli orangutan is a case study of development flying in the face of conservation. An environmental impact assessment carried out on the Batang Toru dam project in 2014, before the orangutan was recognised as a unique species, flagged up some major hazards, including habitat destruction. The following year, a biodiversity survey led by Fredriksson for the dam’s lead construction company, North Sumatra Hydro Energy, recorded numerous critically endangered and legally protected species on the site, including Sumatran tigers, Malayan pangolins and the orangutans. It warned that the area earmarked for the dam was “an integral part of the Batang Toru Ecosystem” and that “the construction of any infrastructure in this fragile ecosystem will have significant impacts on the highly biodiverse and unique Batang Toru forests”.

The orangs in particular will be hit hard. The area that will be cleared and flooded contains the highest density of the apes, with 41 individuals, 5 per cent of the entire global population. But worse, the dam and associated infrastructure will destroy already fragile corridors between the orang’s strongholds, creating three isolated populations that have no hope of interbreeding (see map, left). Two of these are too small to be considered viable. The largest one contains 531 orangs, which is just about viable.

Sound of chainsaws“It’s crazy,” says Laurance. “It’s the world’s most critically endangered great ape, for God’s sake.” Further losses caused by encroachment on the forest will probably condemn the species to the grave. Fredriksson’s biodiversity survey found that the site is already being assaulted by illegal land clearance, catalysed by the prospect of development and facilitated by temporary river crossings installed to get equipment to the site. The survey was

COPY SUBPAGE SUBOK for press

10km

G_Biodiversity_ Batang

5 to 8 years old

Dammed to extinctionThe entire population of Tapanuli orangutans lives in three patches of forest in northern Sumatra. A planned hydroelectric dam will cut o� connections between them and probably doom the species

SOURCE: PRO NATURA FOUNDATION

Pandan

Sibolga

CENTRAL TAPANULI

West block531 individuals

Habitats of Tapanuli orangutans

East block161 individuals

Sibualbuali27 individuals

Area threatened by hydroelectric dam

41 individuals

Wildlife corridors

SOUTH TAPANULI

NORTH TAPANULI SUMATRA

12 million km

...25 million km

The estimated length of road built worldwide since 2000

The projected extra length of road to be built worldwide by 2050

SOURCE: CURRENT BIOLOGY, VOL 27, PAGE PR1130

Continued from page 36

180901_F_BioInfrastructure.indd 40 24/08/2018 14:00

1 September 2018 | NewScientist | 41

carried out to the sound of chainsaws.According to a coalition of local NGOs, the

project is not even necessary. North Sumatra does not have an energy shortage and even if it did, there are other sites that could be developed without destroying a globally important habitat.

And yet the project ploughs on. “[The hydro company] has gone full steam ahead, especially after the orangutan was declared a separate species,” says Fredriksson. In May, the company announced that the dam would open in 2022. A spokesperson told the Jakarta Globe: “We understand that the forest ecosystem plays an important role… We are not going to sacrifice it. This has been our commitment from the very beginning.”

Ultimately, according to an investigation by the NGOs, the project is controlled by Chinese companies and money. New Scientist asked Sinohydro, the Chinese state hydropower company that is a major stakeholder in the project, for comment. It did not respond, but its website says that one of its priorities is “preserving biodiversity”.

It is possible to build infrastructure without destroying vital habitats and the biodiversity that depends on them. Conservation biologists and even pressure groups like WWF accept that development can coexist with environmental protection, bringing enormous benefits to people without trashing nature. “We’re not anti-development, we’re anti-stupid development,” says Laurance.

In Russia’s wild east, for example, a precious habitat for endangered Siberian tigers and

even more endangered Amur leopards was recently saved from being sliced in two by a four-lane highway, part of the Belt and Road Initiative linking Russia to China and North Korea.

“During improvement and widening of this road, we have two or three places where leopards were killed in car accidents,” says Evgeny Shvarts of WWF Russia. Losing that many leopards was a huge blow. At one point, the entire population was down to 29.

He and other conservationists persuaded the Far Eastern Leopards Federal Conservation Program, which is overseen by Sergei Ivanov, Vladimir Putin’s special representative for the environment, to create a wildlife corridor by funding a 530-metre tunnel for the road. “It was a really important case,” says Shvarts. “We really believe it is possible to save habitat if we convince very high-level persons to make the right decisions.” The Narvinskiy Pass tunnel opened in 2016. Tigers and leopards are using the overpass and populations of both are increasing, says Shvarts.

There are other examples. In Nigeria, the government of Cross River state recently agreed to reroute a planned major highway to avoid slicing through a national park that hosts a population of gorillas. In Bangladesh, the state-owned rail company is building overpasses to allow wild elephants to cross a high-speed line now under construction.

And planned infrastructure projects sometimes don’t happen at all. In June, the new Malaysian government abruptly and unexpectedly cancelled four major Belt and Road projects. At the same time, millions of square kilometres of farmland, mostly in developed countries, are being abandoned. This is creating what conservation biologists see as a potential bonanza of ecological restoration, known as “rewilding”, which could be the saviour of biodiversity. But that is another story. ■

Graham Lawton is a staff feature writer for New Scientist

Hydroelectric projects threaten Indonesia’s Batang Toru ecosystem, sole home of the Tapanuli orangutan (below)

This is the second in Graham Lawton’s series of articles about biodiversity. The third will be on rewilding. Send your suggestions for topics to cover to biodiversity@newscientist.com

AN

DR

EW W

ALM

SLEY

/ SO

S / A

LAM

Y ST

OCK

PH

OTO

AN

DR

EW W

ALM

SLEY

/ SO

S / A

LAM

Y ST

OCK

PH

OTO

PORT

RA

IT: K

IRST

IN K

IDD

180901_F_BioInfrastructure.indd 41 24/08/2018 17:52

38 | NewScientist | 1 September 2018

Infr

astr

uctu

re d

evel

opm

ent,

es

peci

ally

of r

oads

, has

alr

eady

di

stur

bed

pris

tine

eco

syst

ems a

cros

s th

e gl

obe

(see

map

, abo

ve).

Wha

t Ch

ina’

s Bel

t and

Roa

d In

itia

tive

(BR

I)

cons

ists

of i

s unc

lear

: the

pro

ject

has

no

off

icia

l map

and

com

mun

icat

ions

ab

out i

t lac

k de

tail.

The

“bel

t”

orig

inal

ly re

ferr

ed to

new

ove

rlan

d lin

ks tr

aver

sing

the

hist

oric

Silk

Roa

d ac

ross

cent

ral A

sia.

The

“roa

d”,

conf

usin

gly,

is a

ship

ping

rout

e fr

om

port

s in

sout

hern

Chi

na to

Wes

tern

Eu

rope

via

Sou

th-E

ast A

sia,

the

Indi

an O

cean

and

the

Suez

Can

al.

The

orig

inal

Silk

Roa

d w

as a

ne

twor

k of

ove

rlan

d tr

ade

rout

es

pass

ing

thro

ugh

anci

ent,

rom

anti

c-so

undi

ng ci

ties

such

as S

amar

kand

, B

ukha

ra a

nd C

onst

anti

nopl

e. It

outl

aste

d th

e G

reek

, Rom

an,

Byz

anti

ne, U

may

yad

and

Mon

gol

empi

res,

but

fell

into

dec

line

in th

e 18

th ce

ntur

y. T

he v

isio

n be

hind

its

rebo

ot, l

aunc

hed

in 2

013

, is t

o hy

per-

acce

lera

te tr

ade

and

deve

lopm

ent

acro

ss E

uras

ia a

nd b

eyon

d.

Wes

tern

crit

ics

ofte

n se

e B

RI a

s pa

rt o

f an

atte

mpt

by

Chin

a to

bui

ld

a ne

w, S

inoc

entr

ic w

orld

ord

er. I

ts

ambi

tion

is ce

rtai

nly

unpr

eced

ente

d:

som

e 70

00

pro

ject

s in

70 co

untr

ies

wit

h a

proj

ecte

d co

st o

f $8

trill

ion

by

2050

. The

bel

t has

now

exp

ande

d to

si

x de

velo

pmen

t cor

rido

rs ra

diat

ing

out f

rom

Chi

na. S

outh

Am

eric

a an

d A

fric

a ha

ve th

eir o

wn

prog

ram

mes

(s

ee m

ap, b

elow

).Th

e po

tent

ial c

ost t

o na

ture

of

BR

I is i

ncal

cula

ble.

As a

gro

up o

f

cons

erva

tion

bio

logi

sts w

rote

in

Nat

ure

Ecol

ogy

and

Evol

utio

n ea

rlie

r th

is y

ear,

“BR

I cou

ld h

ave

disa

stro

us

cons

eque

nces

for b

iodi

vers

ity”

.La

st y

ear,

cons

erva

tion

gro

up W

WF

publ

ishe

d th

e re

sult

s of a

n in

itia

l an

alys

is o

f the

pos

sibl

e im

pact

of t

he

init

iati

ve’s

land

-bas

ed d

evel

opm

ent

corr

idor

s and

war

ned

of a

lita

ny o

f th

reat

s. T

he co

rrid

ors c

ollid

e w

ith

num

erou

s pro

tect

ed a

reas

, w

ilder

ness

es a

nd b

iodi

vers

ity

hots

pots

. The

y sl

ice

thro

ugh

the

rang

es o

f 265

thre

aten

ed sp

ecie

s,

incl

udin

g 8

1 en

dang

ered

and

39

cr

itic

ally

end

ange

red

ones

. Am

ong

thes

e ar

e ti

gers

, sno

w le

opar

ds, s

aiga

an

telo

pes,

Am

ur le

opar

ds a

nd g

iant

pa

ndas

. As y

et, n

obod

y ha

s ass

esse

d th

e im

pact

of t

he m

arit

ime

silk

road

.

Chin

a ha

s re

peat

edly

ple

dged

to

mak

e th

e B

elt a

nd R

oad

a gr

een

and

sust

aina

ble

proj

ect.

Xi m

akes

fr

eque

nt re

fere

nce

to h

is v

isio

n of

tu

rnin

g Ch

ina

into

an

“eco

logi

cal

civi

lisat

ion”

, wit

h su

stai

nabl

e de

velo

pmen

t a p

rior

ity.

He

has

exte

nded

this

sen

tim

ent t

o th

e B

elt a

nd R

oad,

in 2

016

calli

ng o

n pa

rtic

ipan

ts to

“dee

pen

coop

erat

ion

in

env

iron

men

tal p

rote

ctio

n,

inte

nsif

y ec

olog

ical

pre

serv

atio

n an

d bu

ild a

gre

en S

ilk R

oad”

.Co

nser

vati

on b

iolo

gist

Bill

La

uran

ce o

f Jam

es C

ook

Uni

vers

ity,

A

ustr

alia

, acc

epts

that

Chi

na is

m

akin

g ge

nuin

e ef

fort

s dom

esti

cally

. B

ut it

s war

m w

ords

abo

ut th

e B

elt

and

Roa

d In

itia

tive

are

“a g

igan

tic

bunc

h of

gre

enw

ash”

, he

says

.

Evge

ny S

hvar

ts, d

irec

tor o

f co

nser

vati

on p

olic

y at

WW

F R

ussi

a an

d co

-aut

hor o

f a re

cent

rese

arch

pa

per o

n th

e ri

sks

of B

RI t

o R

ussi

a’s

envi

ronm

ent,

war

ns th

at th

e in

itia

tive

is in

par

t a s

leig

ht o

f ha

nd to

 exp

ort e

nvir

onm

enta

lly

dam

agin

g ac

tivi

ties

from

Chi

na to

ot

her c

ount

ries

. Th

e vi

ew fr

om in

side

Chi

na is

mor

e nu

ance

d. A

cons

erva

tion

bio

logi

st w

ho

wor

ks fo

r the

Chi

nese

gov

ernm

ent,

an

d w

ho a

sked

not

to b

e na

med

, say

s Ch

ines

e bi

olog

ists

are

ver

y aw

are

of

the

proj

ect’s

env

iron

men

tal r

isks

and

ar

e be

ing

give

n la

rge

amou

nts

of

fund

ing

to in

vest

igat

e an

d m

itig

ate

them

. But

they

are

als

o ex

pect

ed to

to

e th

e pa

rty

line

that

the

init

iati

ve

is C

hina

’s “g

ift t

o th

e w

orld

”.

COPY

SUB

PAGE

SUB

OK fo

r pre

ssG

_Bio

div

ersi

ty r

oad

s

No

road

sRo

ad d

ensi

ty (m

/km

2 )

Road

den

sity

is a

mea

sure

of h

ow in

tact

eco

syst

ems

are,

and

var

ies

huge

ly a

cros

s th

e gl

obe

<10

10-1

0010

0-25

025

0-10

00>

1000

SOU

RCE:

doi

.org

/cs6

m

Larg

e in

fras

truc

ture

pr

ogra

mm

es th

reat

en

biod

iver

sity

acr

oss

the

glob

e –

wit

h C

hina

’s B

elt a

nd R

oad

Initi

ativ

e a

new

thre

at

PAVE

D

PLA

NET

180901_F_BioInfrastructure.indd 38 24/08/2018 14:00

1 September 2018 | NewScientist | 39

COPY

SUB

PAGE

SUB

OK fo

r pre

ssG

_Bio

div

ersi

ty

SOU

RCE:

IIRS

A PR

IORI

TY P

ROJE

CTS

SOU

RCE:

doi

.org

/gcp

nrh

SOU

RCE:

doi

.org

/9kg

SOU

RCE:

MER

CATO

R IN

STIT

UTE

FO

R CH

INA

STU

DIE

S

0-50

0m

Area

s of

und

istu

rbed

fore

st,

mea

sure

d by

dis

tanc

e fr

om

its e

dge

500-

1000

>10

00

Port

Rail

Act

ive

corr

idor

Plan

ned

Upg

rade

und

er w

ay

Gas

pipe

line

Oil

pipe

line

Sea

rout

e (r

oad)

Land

rout

es (b

elt)

Port

Sout

h Am

eric

aAf

rica

Belt

and

Road

Airp

ort

Tunn

el

Road

Pow

er li

ne

Gas

pipe

line

Rive

r nav

igat

ion

Infr

astr

uctu

re p

roje

cts

arou

nd th

e w

orld

, inc

ludi

ng C

hina

’s Be

lt a

nd R

oad

Init

iati

ve,

thre

aten

rem

aini

ng p

risti

ne fo

rest

eco

syst

ems

The

Mar

itim

e Si

lk R

oad,

par

t of t

he B

elt

and

Road

Init

iati

ve, s

tret

ches

into

the

hear

t of E

urop

e. T

he It

alia

n po

rts

of

Rav

enna

, Ven

ice

and

Trie

ste,

alo

ng w

ith

Kope

r in

Slov

enia

and

Rije

ka in

Cro

atia

, ha

ve fo

rmed

the

Nor

th A

dria

tic

Port

A

ssoc

iati

on to

take

adv

anta

ge. T

he

asso

ciat

ion

has

begu

n w

ork

on a

gia

nt

plat

form

off

Ven

ice

to lo

ad a

nd u

nloa

d hu

ge c

argo

shi

ps fr

om th

e Su

ez C

anal

Russ

ia’s

far e

ast c

onta

ins

vast

tr

acts

of u

ndis

turb

ed fo

rest

and

w

etla

nd h

ome

to S

iber

ian

tige

rs

and

Am

ur le

opar

ds –

a bi

odiv

ersi

ty

succ

ess

stor

y th

reat

ened

by

the

Bel

t and

Roa

d In

itia

tive

Sout

h A

mer

ica

was

re

cent

ly in

vite

d to

join

the

Bel

t and

Roa

d In

itia

tive

, bu

t alre

ady

has

its

own

equi

vale

nt. T

he In

itia

tive

fo

r the

Inte

grat

ion

of

Regi

onal

Infr

astr

uctu

re is

a

$38

bill

ion

plan

to fo

rge

clos

er ti

es b

etw

een

the

cont

inen

t’s e

cono

mie

s.

Impr

ovem

ents

to th

e ro

ad

from

Car

acas

in V

enez

uela

to

Man

aus

in th

e A

maz

on

basi

n in

Bra

zil i

s a

maj

or

cons

erva

tion

wor

ry

Expa

nsio

n of

coal

in

dust

ry in

fras

truc

ture

on

Aus

tral

ia’s

east

co

ast,

par

tly

in

resp

onse

to C

hine

se

dem

and,

thre

aten

s ec

osys

tem

s bo

th

inla

nd a

nd o

ffsh

ore

on

the

Grea

t Bar

rier

Ree

f

The

new

Mal

aysi

an

gove

rnm

ent c

ance

lled

a pl

anne

d hi

gh-s

peed

ra

il lin

k fr

om K

uala

Lu

mpu

r to

Sing

apor

e ea

rlier

this

yea

r – th

e fi

rst m

ajor

set

back

fo

r thi

s st

rate

gica

lly

cruc

ial a

rm o

f the

Bel

t an

d Ro

ad In

itia

tive

The

Bel

t and

Roa

d In

itia

tive

will

mak

e in

road

s in

to A

fric

a,

but t

he co

ntin

ent a

lso

has

at le

ast 3

3 ot

her

deve

lopm

ent c

orrid

ors

plan

ned,

whi

ch w

ould

ad

d 53

,000

kilo

met

res o

f ro

ad a

nd fr

agm

ent v

ital

w

ilder

ness

are

as s

uch

as

the

Cong

o ba

sin

180901_F_BioInfrastructure.indd 39 24/08/2018 14:13