36
Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below and will be included in projects submitted for the May letting. E-mail road related questions on these changes to [email protected]. E-mail bridge related questions to MDOT- [email protected]. Special Details B-28-A & B-29-A, Bridge Barrier Railings, Type 6 & 7 (Dated 1-27-2020): Updated Section D-D. This better represents the orientation of the two triangular panels in the end wall transition section. The panels protrude outward along the diagonal interface. Also updated dimension of EZ6 bar on B-29-A. Road Design Manual 1.02.12C1: Plan & Profile Scale: Revised the “Preferred” and “Acceptable” plan & profile scales from (1” = 80’ and 1” = 100’) to (1” = 40’ and 1” = 50’) horizontal and from (1” = 8’ and 1” = 10’) to (1” = 4’ and 1” = 5’) vertical. 7.01.12: Types of Guardrail Used in Michigan: Revised the use of non-MGS guardrail (Type B, Type T, etc.) to upgrading partial runs of existing guardrail. Bridge Design Manual 8.02 F. (LFD & LRFD): Added hazardous material removal to the use statement. 12.00, 12.04.04 &12.07.08: Added information regarding usage and requesting of hazardous waste numbers. Bridge Design Guides 4.23.02, 6.20.03 B & C, 6.20.04 A: Updated details with Type 6/7 railing. 5.17.05: Updated details with Type 6/7 railing and updated joint fillers and joint types. 6.20.01: Made EA06 bar extending from abutment to backwall epoxy coated. 6.29.11: Added joint detail for expansion joint on parapet railing.

Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    11

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

Road & Bridge Design Publications

Monthly Update – January 2020

1

Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below and will be included in projects submitted for the May letting. E-mail road related questions on these changes to [email protected]. E-mail bridge related questions to [email protected].

Special Details B-28-A & B-29-A, Bridge Barrier Railings, Type 6 & 7 (Dated 1-27-2020): Updated Section D-D. This better represents the orientation of the two triangular panels in the end wall transition section. The panels protrude outward along the diagonal interface. Also updated dimension of EZ6 bar on B-29-A.

Road Design Manual 1.02.12C1: Plan & Profile Scale: Revised the “Preferred” and “Acceptable” plan & profile scales from (1” = 80’ and 1” = 100’) to (1” = 40’ and 1” = 50’) horizontal and from (1” = 8’ and 1” = 10’) to (1” = 4’ and 1” = 5’) vertical. 7.01.12: Types of Guardrail Used in Michigan: Revised the use of non-MGS guardrail (Type B, Type T, etc.) to upgrading partial runs of existing guardrail.

Bridge Design Manual 8.02 F. (LFD & LRFD): Added hazardous material removal to the use statement. 12.00, 12.04.04 &12.07.08: Added information regarding usage and requesting of hazardous waste numbers.

Bridge Design Guides 4.23.02, 6.20.03 B & C, 6.20.04 A: Updated details with Type 6/7 railing. 5.17.05: Updated details with Type 6/7 railing and updated joint fillers and joint types. 6.20.01: Made EA06 bar extending from abutment to backwall epoxy coated. 6.29.11: Added joint detail for expansion joint on parapet railing.

Page 2: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

Road & Bridge Design Publications

Monthly Update – January 2020

2

Updates to MDOT Cell Library, Bridge Auto Draw Program, etc., may be required in tandem with some of this month's updates. Until such updates to automated tools can be made, it is the designer's/detailer's responsibility to manually incorporate any necessary revisions to notes and plan details to reflect these revisions.

Page 3: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

Index to Special Details 1-27-2020

SPECIAL DETAIL

NUMBER

NUMBER OF

SHEETS TITLE CURRENT

DATE

21 2 GUARDRAIL AT INTERSECTIONS 4-9-18

24 8 GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN BACKSLOPE TYPES 4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8 9-28-18

99 2 CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH WIRE ROPE 9-22-14

R-1-G 9 DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 6-15-16

R-15-G 3 COVER K 7-26-19

R-22-F 4 COVER V 8-6-18

R-23-E 3 COVER W 8-6-18

R-24-F 3 COVER VG 8-6-18

R-27-F 1 BRIDGE APPROACH CURB & GUTTER (USING EXISTING CATCH BASIN) 10-14-19

R-28-J 7 SIDEWALK RAMP AND DETECTABLE WARNING DETAILS 7-26-19

R-32-F 8 APPROACH CURB & GUTTER DOWNSPOUTS 12-16-19

R-32-SD 6 APPROACH CURB & GUTTER DOWNSPOUTS (FOR EXISTING RAILINGS) 11-14-19

R-33-G 2 CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER AND URBAN FREEWAY CURB 8-14-19

R-35-E 2 CONCRETE SHOULDER GUTTER AND SPILLWAY 7-30-18

R-45-J 2 PAVEMENT REINFORCEMENT FOR BRIDGE APPROACH 6-25-18

R-53-A 22 TEMPORARY CONCRETE BARRIER LIMITED DEFLECTION 8-14-15

R-56-F 6 GUARDRAIL MEDIAN OBJECT PROTECTION 2-5-19

R-60-J 17 GUARDRAIL TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD, MGS-8, & MGS-8D 2-27-19

R-62-H 4 GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPE 2M 5-1-18

R-63-C 16 GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPES 3B & 3T 2-5-19

R-66-E 4 GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPES B, T, & MGS 9-28-18

R-67-G 16 GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, BRIDGE, DETAILS 11-6-19

R-67-SD 7 GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, BRIDGE, DETAILS (FOR EXISTING RAILINGS) 11-13-19

R-72-D 11 W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL & GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN INSTALLATIONS 2-7-19

R-73-F 3 GUARDRAIL OVER BOX OR SLAB CULVERTS 8-1-19

R-84-A 1 BOX CULVERT JOINT TIE ASSEMBLIES 2-19-19

R-86-F 2 PRECAST CONCRETE END SECTION FOR PIPE CULVERT 9-13-18

R-95-G 7 CULVERT SLOPED END SECTIONS 9-19-18

R-126-I 5 PLACEMENT OF TEMPORARY CONCRETE & STEEL BARRIER 8-25-15

R-127-G 8 DELINEATOR INSTALLATIONS 3-4-19

* Denotes New or Revised Special Detail to be included in projects for (beginning with) the May letting.

Note: Former Standard Plans IV-87, IV-89, IV-90, and IV-91 Series, used for building cast-in-place concrete head walls for elliptical and circular pipe culverts, are now being replaced with plans that detail each specific size. The Special Structures Unit will provide these full-sized special details for inclusion in construction plans for MDOT jobs. To assure prompt delivery, requests must be made in advance.

Former Standard Plans IV-93 and IV-94 series have been replaced with precast concrete box & three-sided culverts as per the 2012 Standard Specifications for Construction.

pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
Page 4: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

Index to Bridge Detail Sheets 1-27-2020

DETAIL NUMBER

NUMBEROF

SHEETS TITLE CURRENT

DATE

B-22-E 5 BRIDGE RAILING, THRIE BEAM RETROFIT (R4 TYPE RAILING) 10-23-19

B-23-F 6 BRIDGE RAILING, THRIE BEAM RETROFIT (OPEN PARAPET RAILING) 10-23-19

B-26-F 8 BRIDGE RAILING, 4 TUBE 5-22-18

*B-28-A 7 BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, TYPE 7 1-27-20

*B-29-A 8 BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, TYPE 6 1-27-20

B-50-A 3 BRIDGE RAILING, CONCRETE BLOCK RETROFIT 10-15-19

B-101-G 2 DRAIN CASTING ASSEMBLEY DETAILS 7-26-18

EJ3AC 1 to 3 EXPANSION JOINT DETAILS 10-8-19

EJ4P 1 to 3 EXPANSION JOINT DETAILS 10-8-19

PC-1M 1 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE I-BEAM DETAILS 8-23-17

PC-2H 1 70" PRESTRESSED CONCRETE I-BEAM DETAILS 8-23-17

PC-4F 1 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 1800 BEAM DETAILS 8-23-17

* Denotes New or Revised Special Detail to be included in projects for (beginning with) the May letting.

Note: Details EJ3AC & EJ4P are interactive, i.e. designers and detailers choose details based upon railing type and angle of crossing. Place all details appropriate for the project, structure specific information, and the Expansion Joint Device quantity on the sheet. The sheet shall then be added to the plans as a normal plan sheet.

Detail PC-1M, PC-2H and PC-4F shall have structure specific information and quantities added to the sheet. The sheet shall then be added to the plans as a normal plan sheet.

pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
pikkaw
Highlight
Page 5: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

2'-4"

< 1"

EA#4 BARS

TOP OF SLAB

SEE CURRENT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPACING

BARRIER REFLECTOR MARKER

SECTION A-A

END OF BARRIER

ƒ" BEVEL

ƒ" BEVEL BOTH SIDES

B-28-A

TYPE 7

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING,

DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:

DRAWN BY:

Michigan Department of Transportation

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

APPROVED BY:

APPROVED BY:

Paul C. Ajegba

BY

PREPARED

DESIGN DIVISION DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES

DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT

APPROVED BY:

DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES

\ EXPANSION JOINTA

A

1'-11"

(TYP)

MIN. LAP

3'-6" MIN. LAP EA#6 BARS (TYP)

EA#6 BAR

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, TYPE 7 OUTSIDE ELEVATION

EZ1#4 BARS @ 6"

EP1#4 BARS @ 6"

7†"

(8 TOTAL)

EA#4 BAR (TYP)

BARRIER REFLECTOR MARKER

3'-0"

T

6‡"

2"

4"

3

SP

AC

ES

@ 10"

= 2'-6"

EA#4

BA

RS

2"

6"

EA#4

BA

RS

8"

= 1'-8"

2

SP

AC

ES

@ 10"

1•"

(TYP)

7"

EP1#4 BARS @ 6"

EZ1#4 BARS @ 6"

EA#6 BAR

6"

5‚" 4"

FORMING NOT REQUIRED

2" x 6" KEYWAY

2

1

NO AESTHETIC TREATMENT

7

1-27-2020

1

B.L.T.

V.Z.

2•"

+ SEE NOTES

++ SEE NOTES

Page 6: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

SECTION A-A

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, AESTHETIC, TYPE 7, DET 1

IF APPLICABLE, ARE AS DETAILED ON THE PLANS.

THE TYPE AND LIMITS OF THE AESTHETIC TREATMENT,

( )

SECTION A-A

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, AESTHETIC, TYPE 7, DET 2

IF APPLICABLE, ARE AS DETAILED ON THE PLANS.

THE TYPE AND LIMITS OF THE AESTHETIC TREATMENT,

( )

B-28-A

TYPE 7

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING,

7†"

(8 TOTAL)

EA#4 BAR (TYP)

BARRIER REFLECTOR MARKER

3'-0"

T

6‡"

2"

4"

3

SP

AC

ES

@ 10"

= 2'-6"

EA#4

BA

RS

2"

6"

EA#4

BA

RS

8"

=

1'-

8"

2

SP

AC

ES

@ 10"

1•"

(TYP)

7"

EP1#4 BARS @ 6"

EZ1#4 BARS @ 6"

EA#6 BAR

6"

4"

VARIES

1•" MAX.

VA

RI

ES

VA

RI

ES

4"

MI

N

VA

RI

ES

5‚"

8†"

(8 TOTAL)

EA#4 BAR (TYP)

BARRIER REFLECTOR MARKER

3'-0"

T

6‡"

2"

4"

3

SP

AC

ES

@ 10"

= 2'-6"

EA#4

BA

RS

2"

6"

EA#4

BA

RS

8"

= 1'-8"

2

SP

AC

ES

@ 10"

2•"

(TYP)

7"

EP1#4 BARS @ 6"

EZ1#4 BARS @ 6"

EA#6 BAR

6"

4"

VARIES

1" MAX.

VA

RI

ES

VA

RI

ES

4"

MI

N

VA

RI

ES

5‚"

2

1

FORMING NOT REQUIRED

2" x 6" KEYWAY

2

1

FORMING NOT REQUIRED

2" x 6" KEYWAY

72

1-27-2020

1•"

2•"

+ SEE NOTES

++ SEE NOTES

++ SEE NOTES

Page 7: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

B-28-A

TYPE 7

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING,

PLAN VIEWELEVATION VIEW SECTION B-B

B

LIGHT STANDARD DETAILS

STANDARD

\ LIGHT

1'-10"

3‚"CONDUIT

3" !

2'-0‡"

11"11"

1'-2•" 3ƒ"3ƒ"

1'-2•" 8"8"

MAX.MAX.

BARRIER

TOE OF

1'-10"

STANDARD

\ LIGHT

3'-0"

ED#

4

BA

RS

STANDARD

\ LIGHT

ED#4 BARS

B

CONDUIT

3" !

ED#4 BARS

ED#4 BARS

NO AESTHETIC TREATMENT ON LIGHT STANDARD 1'-10" x 11‡" PROTRUSION

6‡"

EA#

4

BA

RS

BA

RRI

ER

SP

AC

ED

WI

TH

FASCIA

SLAB

9"9"

7"

EZ1#4 BARS

EP1#4 BARS

73

1-27-2020

Page 8: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

B-28-A

TYPE 7

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING,

10'-0"

BRI

DG

E

AP

PR

OA

CH

BRI

DG

E

AP

PR

OA

CH

BRI

DG

E

DE

CK

SL

EE

PE

R

SL

AB

SL

EE

PE

R

SL

AB

RE

F.

LI

NE

RE

F.

LI

NE

10'-0"

BRI

DG

E

RAI

LI

NG,

TY

PE 7

WI

LL I

NC

LU

DE

TH

E

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

SE

CTI

ON

S

BRI

DG

E

BA

RRI

ER

RAI

LI

NG,

TY

PE 7

NO

RM

AL

SE

CTI

ON

*

VA

RI

ES

*

VA

RI

ES

PL

AN

VIE

W

BRID

GE

BA

RRIE

R

RAILIN

G,

TY

PE

7

TH

E

BRI

DG

E

DE

CK.

PA

RT

LY

ON

BRI

DG

E

DE

CK

OR I

F

NO

AP

PR

OA

CH

SL

AB I

S

PR

ES

EN

T,

EN

TI

RE

LY

ON

*

DE

PE

ND

AN

T

UP

ON

BRI

DG

E

AP

PR

OA

CH

LE

NG

TH,

TH

E

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

SE

CTI

ON

CA

N

BE

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

SE

CTI

ON

EN

DW

AL

L

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

SE

CTI

ON

EN

DW

AL

L

74

1-27-2020

Page 9: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

CDE

CDE

ELEVATION VIEW

3'-0"

2'-8ƒ"

1'-3"

1'-9"

BARRIER RAILING, TYPE 7".

INCLUDED IN THE BID ITEM "BRIDGE

INSTALLED BY THE BRIDGE CONTRACTOR.

DETAILS. BOLTS TO BE FURNISHED AND

SEE STANDARD PLAN R-67-SERIES FOR

\ OF BOLTS FOR GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE

31"

B-28-A

TYPE 7

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING,

6"

2'-6"

NAME PLATE

STRUCTURE

LOCATION OF

2" 6" 4"

EW#4 BARS EA#4 BARS

EZ4#4 BARS

EP4#4 BARS

8 SPA @ 6" = 4'-0"

EZ3#4

BA

RS

EP3#4

BA

RS

3

SP

A

@ 6"

= 1'-6"

EZ2#4

BA

RS

EP2#4

BA

RS

3

SP

A

@ 6"

= 1'-6"

PLAN VIEW

NORMAL BARRIER SECTION10'-0" ENDWALL TRANSITION SECTION

3'-4" ENDWALL 6'-8" TRANSITION

75

1-27-2020

AESTHETIC TREATMENT. SEE SECTION D-D ON SHEET 6.

FROM 1'-2•" (1'-3•") TO 12" (13") DEPENDANT UPON

7†" (8†") TO 12" (13") AND BOTTOM TRANSITIONS

TWO TRIANGULAR PANELS. TOP TRANSITIONS FROM

EZ1#4 BARS @ 6"

EP1#4 BARS @ 6"

6" 6"

EZ1#4

BA

RS

EP1#4

BA

RS

2

SP

A

@ 6"

= 1'-0"

Page 10: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

B-28-A

TYPE 7

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING,

76

1-27-2020 13" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, AESTHETIC, TYPE 7, DET 2

12" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, AESTHETIC, TYPE 7, DET 1 (+ SEE NOTES)

*** 12" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, TYPE 7 (+ SEE NOTES)

8†" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, AESTHETIC, TYPE 7, DET 2

7†" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, AESTHETIC, TYPE 7, DET 1 (+ SEE NOTES)

** 7†" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, TYPE 7 (+ SEE NOTES)

1•" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, AESTHETIC, TYPE 7, DET 2

2•" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, AESTHETIC, TYPE 7, DET 1 (+ SEE NOTES)

* 2•" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, TYPE 7 (+ SEE NOTES)

SECTION C-C

(4 TOTAL)

EA#4 BAR (TYP)

6‡"

T

4"

2"

3

SP

AC

ES

@ 10"

= 2'-6"

EA#4

BA

RS

3'-0"

EW

#4

BA

RS

6"

2"

8"

= 1'-8"

2

SP

AC

ES

@

10"

SECTION E-E

T

4"

2"

3

SP

AC

ES

@ 10"

= 2'-6"

EA#4

BA

RS

3'-0"

(4 TOTAL)

EA#4 BAR (TYP)

EW#4

BA

RS

6"

2"

8"

= 1'-8"

2

SP

AC

ES

@ 10"

SECTION D-D

(4 TOTAL)

EA#4 BAR (TYP)

T

4"

2"

3

SP

AC

ES

@ 10"

= 2'-6"

EA#4

BA

RS

3'-0"

EW#4

BA

RS

6"

2"

8"

= 1'-8"

2

SP

AC

ES

@ 10"

VARIES

TO VERTICAL WALL

FACE FROM SINGLE SLOPE SHAPE

UNIFORMLY TRANSITION BARRIER

EP4#4 BARS @ 8"

EZ4#4 BARS @ 8"

7"

13"

*** 12"

1•"

* 2•"

1•"

* 2•"

EP1#4 BARS @ 8"

EZ1#4 BARS @ 8"

8†"

** 7†"

1•"

* 2•"

VARIES

EZ3#4 BAR

EZ2#4 BAR OR

EP3#4 BAR

EP2#4 BAR OR

EW1#4 BAR

EW4#4 BAR

EW3#4 BAR

EW2#4 BAR

(4 TOTAL)

EW#4 BAR (TYP)

(4 TOTAL)

EW#4 BAR (TYP)

EW#6 BAREA#6 BAR

EW#6 BAREA#6 BAR

EA#6 BARS

VA

RI

ES

VA

RI

ES

pikkaw
Rectangle
Page 11: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

VERTICAL ON LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATED SECTION.

OF SUPERELEVATION SECTION.

PERPENDICULAR TO PLANE OF SLAB ON NORMAL CROWN SECTION AND HIGH SIDE

B-28-A

TYPE 7

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING,

77

1-27-2020

++ BRIDGE BARRIER ORIENTATION :

NOTES:

DETAILS SHOWN ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT AASHTO SPECIFICATIONS.

SPECIFICATIONS.

ALL WORK AND MATERIAL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD

B-103-SERIES.

FOR LIGHT STANDARD ANCHOR BOLT ASSEMBLY DETAILS, SEE STANDARD PLAN

ON THE PLANS.

INCREASED OR MAINTAINING SHOULDER WIDTHS. DISTANCE TO BE DETAILED

AND TOE OF BARRIER SHIFTED ACCORDINGLY TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEED FOR

+ BACK OF BARRIER TO SLAB FASCIA MAY BE DECREASED TO 1•" (FROM 2•")

1EW1 3'-1" 6'-8"

c g f# of bars b

6'-8"

L = c + a + gc b a

g

f 3'-1"

a

EW0412103‚"

ENDWALL TRANSITION SECTION BARS

c h j# of bars d

c d e

h

j

e

ENDWALL TRANSITION SECTION BARS

1EW3 3'-1" 6'-8"6'-8" 3'-3" EW041300

1EW4 3'-1" 6'-8"6'-8" 3'-4" EW0413012„"

1EW2 3'-1" 6'-8"6'-8" 3'-2" EW041211

L = c + e + h

1‚"

†"

c

h

3"

a

b g

e

c

1'-5" 3"7ƒ" 3ƒ"

3"

3"

3"--

2„"

8ƒ"7ƒ"

a b gec

3

4

4

9

# of bars h - a

EZ040407

EZ040406

EZ040407

EZ040409

L = a + b + c + e

EZ1

EZ2

EZ3

EZ4

h

7ƒ"1'-5"

1'-5"

1'-5"

1"

ENDWALL TRANSITION SECTION BARS

1'-8"

1'-8"

1'-8"

1'-8"

1'-8…" 11•"

10…"

b c e

3

4

# of bars

e

b

6ƒ"

EZ040606

EZ040604

EZ040603

9†"4

9

EP1

EP2

EP3

EP4

a

a

EZ040605

4‡"

g

g

--

6†"

1†"

9" 9"

ENDWALL TRANSITION SECTION BARS

L = a + b + c

2'-10•"

2'-10•"

2'-10•"

2'-10•"

2'-11„" 11•"

2'-10•"

1'-8"

8" 2'-10•"

2'-10†" 3†"

9" 9"

1'-8„"

1'-8"

9‡"

Page 12: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

B-29-A

2'-4"

< 1"

(TYP)

MIN. LAPA

END OF BARRIER

ƒ" BEVEL

AEA#6 BARTOP OF SLAB

SEE CURRENT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPACING

BARRIER REFLECTOR MARKER

ƒ" BEVEL BOTH SIDES

SECTION A-A

DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:

DRAWN BY:

Michigan Department of Transportation

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

APPROVED BY:

APPROVED BY:

Paul C. Ajegba

BY

PREPARED

DESIGN DIVISION DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES

DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT

APPROVED BY:

DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES

2'-4"

EZ2#4 BARS @ 8"

EZ1#4 BARS @ 8"

\ EXPANSION JOINT

NO AESTHETIC TREATMENT

TYPE 6

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING,

9ƒ"

(12 TOTAL)

EA#5 BAR (TYP)

1'-5ƒ"

1'-8‚"

EA#6 BAR

BARRIER REFLECTOR MARKER

8"

2

6"

3'-6"

T

4"

1

7"

EZ2#4 BARS @ 8"

EZ1#4 BARS @ 8"

++ SEE NOTES

3"

3"

= 1'-0"

2

SP

AC

ES

@ 6"

= 2'-0"

3

SP

AC

ES

@ 8"

EA#

5

BA

RS

SEE SHEET 6

TRANSITION SECTION

EW#5 BARS IN

EA#5 BARS

8

1-27-2020

1

2"

(TYP)

FORMING NOT REQUIRED

2" x 6" KEYWAY

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, TYPE 6 OUTSIDE ELEVATION

3'-6" MIN. LAP EA#6 BARS (TYP)

B.L.T.

V.Z.

+ SEE NOTES

2•"

+ SEE NOTES

Page 13: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

B-29-A

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

9ƒ"

1'-5ƒ"EA#6 BAR

SECTION A-A

8"

6"

3'-6"

T

7"

VA

RI

ES

VA

RI

ES

4"

MI

N

VA

RI

ES

VARIES

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, AESTHETIC, TYPE 6, DET 1

1•" MAX.

TYPE 6

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING,

3"

3"

= 1'-0"

2

SP

AC

ES

@ 6"

= 2'-0"

3

SP

AC

ES

@

8"

EA#

5

BA

RS

(12 TOTAL)

EA#5 BAR (TYP)

BARRIER REFLECTOR MARKER

EZ2#4 BARS @ 8"

++ SEE NOTES

EZ1#4 BARS @ 8"

82

IF APPLICABLE, ARE AS DETAILED ON THE PLANS.

THE TYPE AND LIMITS OF THE AESTHETIC TREATMENT,

( )

2"

(TYP)

1'-8‚"

1-27-2020

FORMING NOT REQUIRED

2" x 6" KEYWAY

4"

2

1

2•"

+ SEE NOTES

+ SEE NOTES

Page 14: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

B-29-A

10ƒ"

1'-6ƒ"

1'-8‚"

EA#6 BAR

SECTION A-A

8"

6"

4" 7"

VARIES

TYPE 6

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING,

1" MAX.

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, AESTHETIC, TYPE 6, DET 2

3'-6"

T

VA

RI

ES

VA

RI

ES

4"

MI

N

VA

RI

ES

3"

3"

= 1'-0"

2

SP

AC

ES

@ 6"

= 2'-0"

3

SP

AC

ES

@

8"

EA#

5

BA

RS

(12 TOTAL)

EA#5 BAR (TYP)

BARRIER REFLECTOR MARKER

EZ2#4 BARS @ 8"

++ SEE NOTES

EZ1#4 BARS @ 8"

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

83

IF APPLICABLE, ARE AS DETAILED ON THE PLANS.

THE TYPE AND LIMITS OF THE AESTHETIC TREATMENT,

( )

2"

(TYP)

1-27-2020

FORMING NOT REQUIRED

2" x 6" KEYWAY

2

1

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

1•"

Page 15: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

PLAN VIEWELEVATION VIEW SECTION B-B

B

LIGHT STANDARD DETAILS

STANDARD

\ LIGHT

1'-10"

3‚"CONDUIT

3" !

8"9ƒ"

2'-3•"

11"11"

1'-2•" 3ƒ"3ƒ"

1'-2•" 8"8"

MAX.MAX.

BARRIER

TOE OF

FASCIA

SLAB

1'-10"

STANDARD

\ LIGHT

3'-6"

ED#

4

BA

RS

BA

RRI

ER

SP

AC

ED

WI

TH

EA#

4

BA

RS

STANDARD

\ LIGHT

ED#4 BARS

B

CONDUIT

3" !

ED#4 BARS

ED#4 BARS

7"

EZ2#4 BARS

EZ1#4 BARS

9ƒ"

NO AESTHETIC TREATMENT ON LIGHT STANDARD 1'-10" x 9ƒ" PROTRUSION

B-29-A

TYPE 6

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING,

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

84

1-27-2020

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

Page 16: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

10'-0"

BRI

DG

E

AP

PR

OA

CH

BRI

DG

E

AP

PR

OA

CH

BRI

DG

E

DE

CK

SL

EE

PE

R

SL

AB

SL

EE

PE

R

SL

AB

RE

F.

LI

NE

RE

F.

LI

NE

B-29-A

10'-0"

BRI

DG

E

RAI

LI

NG,

TY

PE 6

WI

LL I

NC

LU

DE

TH

E

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

SE

CTI

ON

S

TYPE 6

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING,

BRI

DG

E

BA

RRI

ER

RAI

LI

NG,

TY

PE 6

NO

RM

AL

SE

CTI

ON

*

VA

RI

ES

*

VA

RI

ES

PL

AN

VIE

W

BRID

GE

BA

RRIE

R

RAILIN

G,

TY

PE

6

TH

E

BRI

DG

E

DE

CK.

PA

RT

LY

ON

BRI

DG

E

DE

CK

OR I

F

NO

AP

PR

OA

CH

SL

AB I

S

PR

ES

EN

T,

EN

TI

RE

LY

ON

*

DE

PE

ND

AN

T

UP

ON

BRI

DG

E

AP

PR

OA

CH

LE

NG

TH,

TH

E

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

SE

CTI

ON

CA

N

BE

85

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

SE

CTI

ON

EN

DW

AL

L

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

SE

CTI

ON

EN

DW

AL

L

1-27-2020

Page 17: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

4" 8" 8" 4"

PLAN VIEW

CDE

CDE

ELEVATION VIEW

3'-6"

2'-8ƒ"

6"

1'-9"

1'-9"

BARRIER RAILING, TYPE 6".

INCLUDED IN THE BID ITEM "BRIDGE

INSTALLED BY THE BRIDGE CONTRACTOR.

DETAILS. BOLTS TO BE FURNISHED AND

SEE STANDARD PLAN R-67-SERIES FOR

\ OF BOLTS FOR GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE

NAME PLATE

STRUCTURE

LOCATION OF

B-29-A

2'-6"

EW#5 BARS EA#5 BARS

EZ2#4 BARS @ 8"

EZ1#4 BARS @ 8"

TYPE 6

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING,

NORMAL BARRIER SECTION

31"

86

10'-0" ENDWALL TRANSITION SECTION

3'-4" ENDWALL 6'-8" TRANSITION

EZ4#4

BA

RS

EZ3#4

BA

RS

1

SP

A

@ 8"

EZ6#4

BA

RS

EZ5#4

BA

RS

2

SP

A

@ 8"

= 1'-4"

EZ8#4

BA

RS

EZ7#4

BA

RS

3

SP

A

@ 8"

= 2'-0"

1-27-2020

AESTHETIC TREATMENT. SEE SECTION D-D ON SHEET 7.

FROM 1'-5ƒ" (1'-6ƒ") TO 12" (13") DEPENDANT UPON

9ƒ" (10 ƒ") TO 12" (13") AND BOTTOM TRANSITIONS

TWO TRIANGULAR PANELS. TOP TRANSITIONS FROM

EZ10#4 BARS

EZ9#4 BARS

5 SPA @ 8" = 3'-4"

8"

Page 18: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

VARIES

8"

3'-6"

T

SECTION C-C

SECTION D-D SECTION E-E

3"

3"

TO VERTICAL WALL

FACE FROM SINGLE SLOPE SHAPE

UNIFORMLY TRANSITION BARRIER

B-29-A

(6 TOTAL)

EA#5 BAR (TYP)

TYPE 6

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING,

7"

EA#

5

&

EW#

5

BA

RS

=

1'-

0"

@ 6"

2

SP

AC

ES

= 2'-0"

@ 8"

3

SP

AC

ES

7"

3'-6"

T

3"

3"

EA#

5

&

EW#

5

BA

RS

= 1'-0"

@ 6"

2

SP

AC

ES

= 2'-0"

@ 8"

3

SP

AC

ES

3'-6"

T

3"

3"

= 1'-0"

@ 6"

2

SP

AC

ES

= 2'-0"

@ 8"

3

SP

AC

ES

7"

(6 TOTAL)

EA#5 BAR (TYP)

87

VARIES

EZ9#4 BAR

EZ10#4 BAR

EZ7#4 BAR

EZ5#4 BAR OR

EZ8#4 BAR

EZ6#4 BAR OR

1•"

* 2•"

10ƒ"

** 9ƒ"

13"

*** 12"

1•"

* 2•"

1•"

* 2•"

1-27-2020

EZ4#4 BAR

EZ3#4 BAR

13" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, AESTHETIC, TYPE 6, DET 2

12" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, AESTHETIC, TYPE 6, DET 1 (+ SEE NOTES)

*** 12" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, TYPE 6 (+ SEE NOTES)

10ƒ" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, AESTHETIC, TYPE 6, DET 2

9ƒ" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, AESTHETIC, TYPE 6, DET 1 (+ SEE NOTES)

** 9ƒ" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, TYPE 6 (+ SEE NOTES)

1•" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, AESTHETIC, TYPE 6, DET 2

2•" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, AESTHETIC, TYPE 6, DET 1 (+ SEE NOTES)

* 2•" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING, TYPE 6 (+ SEE NOTES)

EA#

5

&

EW#

5

BA

RS

(6 TOTAL)

EW#5 BAR (TYP)

(6 TOTAL)

EW#5 BAR (TYP)

EW1#5 BAR

EW2#5 BAR

EW6#5 BAR

EW5#5 BAR

EW4#5 BAR

(6 TOTAL)

EA#5 BAR (TYP)

EW3#5 BAR

EA#6 BARS

EW#6 BAREA#6 BAR EW#6 BAREA#6 BAR

VA

RI

ES

VA

RI

ES

pikkaw
Rectangle
Page 19: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OF

SHEET

PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR

B-29-A

TYPE 6

BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING,

88

1-27-2020

c b a

g

f

c d e

h

jh

a

b g

e

e

b

c

a

f

c

h

g

1'-8„" 10ƒ" 4‚"

a b gec

--

# of bars

EZ040509EZ1

h

1'-3" 1'-10ƒ"1'-11„"

2…"11‡"9•"

a b gec

2

3

4

# of bars

EZ040501

EZ040504

EZ040508EZ3

EZ5

EZ7

h

10„"1'-8…"

1'-8†"

1'-10ƒ"

1'-10ƒ"

1'-10ƒ"

1'-10‡"

1'-2…"

†"1'-10ƒ"

ENDWALL TRANSITION SECTION BARS

--6 EZ040411

L = a + b + c + e

EZ9 1'-8‚" 1'-10ƒ"1'-10ƒ"8" 8"

8•"

1'-11„"

9„"

4‚"

L = a + b + c + e

b c e

--

# of bars

1'-1‚"3'-2‚" EZ040904EZ2

a

2'-3…"

h

3'-1†"2'-3"

f

6„"

g

7„"

10„"

b c e

2

3

# of bars

1'-0†"3'-2‚"

6†" 3'-1‡"

EZ040900

EZ040902

EZ040903

8‡"4 7‚"

6

EZ4

EZ6

EZ8

EZ10

L = a + b + c + e + f

a

2'-3"

2'-3…"

2'-3‚"

2'-3…"

h

3'-1†"2'-3"

f

2'-3"

2'-3"

2'-3"

EZ040900

6„"

g

--

3'-1†"

3'-1†"

3'-1†"

6•"

1†"3'-1†"

3'-1†"8" 8"

ENDWALL TRANSITION SECTION BARS

BARRIER SECTION BARS

L = a + b + c + e + f

3•"

BARRIER SECTION BARS

1'-7ƒ"

NOTES:

DETAILS SHOWN ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT AASHTO SPECIFICATIONS.

VERTICAL ON LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATED SECTION.

OF SUPERELEVATION SECTION.

PERPENDICULAR TO PLANE OF SLAB ON NORMAL CROWN SECTION AND HIGH SIDE

SPECIFICATIONS.

ALL WORK AND MATERIAL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD

B-103-SERIES.

FOR LIGHT STANDARD ANCHOR BOLT ASSEMBLY DETAILS, SEE STANDARD PLAN

ON THE PLANS.

INCREASED OR MAINTAINING SHOULDER WIDTHS. DISTANCE TO BE DETAILED

AND TOE OF BARRIER SHIFTED ACCORDINGLY TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEED FOR

+ BACK OF BARRIER TO SLAB FASCIA MAY BE DECREASED TO 1•" (FROM 2•")

++ BRIDGE BARRIER ORIENTATION :

1EW1 3'-1" 6'-8"

c g f# of bars b

6'-8"

L = c + a + g

3'-1"

a

EW0512101†"

ENDWALL TRANSITION SECTION BARS

c h j# of bars d e

ENDWALL TRANSITION SECTION BARS

L = c + e + h

1EW3 3'-1" 6'-8"6'-8" 3'-3" EW0513001…"

1EW4 3'-1" 6'-8"6'-8" 3'-4" EW0513012‡"

1EW5 3'-1" 6'-8„"6'-8" 3'-4‡" EW051302

1EW6 3'-1" 6'-8" 3'-5‡" EW0513035„"6'-8„"

4"

1EW2 3'-1" 6'-8"6'-8" 3'-2" EW051211„"

pikkaw
Rectangle
Page 20: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL ROAD DESIGN

1.02.12 (revised 1-27-2020)

Removal, Construction Plan, and Profile Sheets

A. Removal

Separate Removal Sheets should be considered depending on the type, location, and complexity of the project. Removal Sheets are almost always needed for projects in congested urban areas.

An early determination should be made whether or not to include removal items on the construction plan sheets. If this would cause the plans to become cluttered and difficult to read, then separate Removal Sheets should be used. The Removal Sheets should show all existing topography within the project limits.

All items for removal will be indicated on these sheets. Once it has been determined that an item is to be removed and it has been indicated on the Removal Sheet, the item should no longer appear on the construction plan sheet. Slope stake lines should be shown to determine removal limits. The edges of proposed pavement or back of curb may also be beneficial in determining removals.

Subdivision plat information shall be shown on the Removal Sheets.

The Removal Sheets shall only show the alignment required to construct the project.

1.02.12

B. General

Construction plan and profile sheets are the "meat" of a set of plans. Plan sheets are “overhead” maps or pictorial representations of the project to be constructed. Plan sheets indicate what items need to be removed, replaced, relocated, reconstructed, constructed, or adjusted. Plan sheets must be clear, complete, correct, and uniform to convey to the contractor how to construct the project and what materials will be needed.

P.C., P.I., and P.T. Station labels shall be shown for the alignment required to construct the project.

If the scope of work involves a significant amount of drainage and utility renovation or removal, separate plan sheets may be required for each phase of construction (removal, utility and drainage, and construction).

Profile sheets show existing elevations and proposed elevations of the finished construction project. They also show drainage details including existing and proposed ditch elevation, top of curbs, drainage structures, sewers, and other utility information. Profile sheets should also show grading information, such as front and back slopes, peat location and treatment, and excavation and embankment quantities.

Profile sheets may not be required on all projects, such as when the grade is not changing, or it is changing at a uniform rate.

Page 21: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL ROAD DESIGN

1.02.12 (continued)

Removal, Construction Plan, and Profile Sheets

C. Guidelines

1. Plan and Profile Scale

Rural Projects

Plan 1" = 100’ (1” = 80’ for reconstruction)

Profile 1" = 100' horizontal 1" = 10' vertical

Urban Projects

Preferred Acceptable

Plan 1" = 40' 1" = 50'

Profile 1” = 40’ horizontal 1” = 4’ vertical

1" = 50' horizontal 1" = 5' vertical

The preferred larger scale of 1"=40' is more accommodating for congested areas and for detailed grades. Reduced scales, 1"=200' or smaller, can be used for staging plans, pavement markings, vicinity or drainage maps and interchange drawings so that the entire project or interchange can be shown on one plan sheet.

2. Sheet Breaks

Preferred sheet breaks are as follows:

200 Scale: 2400' per sheet (24 stations) 100 Scale: 1200' per sheet (12 stations) 80 Scale: 1000' per sheet (10 stations) 50 Scale: 600' per sheet (6 stations) 40 Scale: 500' per sheet (5 stations)

1.02.12C (continued)

3. Information

Plan sheets should include the following, except for the noted items which may be shown on separate sheets.

1. North orientation arrow. 2. City limits. 3. Township, range, and section. 4. Existing pavement description including

width and type (indicate limits of milling or surfacing).

5. ROW, (existing and proposed) including cross roads.

6. Slope stake lines. 7. House numbers on urban projects and

rural projects, if available. 8. Property owners names on rural projects,

when available. 9. Existing drainage, direction of flow, size,

and type of all existing culverts and sewers.

10. Pay items and leaders to specific work types.

11. "This Sheet" quantity listings shall include only items that are not included elsewhere on the sheet.

12. Detail of guardrail installation(s). 13. Existing utilities – NOTE: Flag all gas, oil

& underground electric power lines as "hazardous or flammable material". Flag all underground telephone, water transmission, and fiber optics as “caution critical utility”. All other underground private and municipal utilities should be shown in standard line coding with the type of utility, size, type of pipe (if known) and flow arrows (if applicable). Generally, overhead utilities (excluding overhead high voltage transmission lines) are not shown on the plans, unless these utilities are in the vicinity of structures such as bridges or culverts where cranes are in operation.

14. Existing Driveways. 15. Streets and Crossroads - name, width,

surface, etc. 16. Soil survey boundaries identified with

soil series.

Page 22: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

ROAD DESIGN MANUAL ROAD DESIGN

7.01.12 (revised 1-27-2020)

Types of Guardrail Used in Michigan

There are seven standard types of steel beam guardrail in addition to cable barrier found on Michigan highways. The term "Current Use" means "currently proposed for use", not necessarily what may be found existing in the field.

A. Type A (Standard Plan R-60-Series)

Description: W-beam attached directly to posts, Terminal End Shoes on ends. 12'-6" post spacing, 28" height to top of rail.

Current Use: 1. Cul-de-sacs 2. Limited to locations not exposed to

through traffic.

B. Type B (Standard Plan R-60-Series)

Description: W-beam guardrail, 8" offset blocks. 6'-3" post spacing, 28" height to top of rail.

Current Use: 1. Updating existing Type B guardrail on free

access trunklines when the entire run of guardrail is not being removed and replaced.

2. On local roads when part of a state trunkline project.

C. Type BD (Standard Plan R-60-Series)

Description: Type B with W-beam on both sides of the post, 8" offset blocks.

Current Use: 1. Updating existing Type BD guardrail in

medians on free access highways when the entire run of guardrail is not being removed and replaced.

7.01.12 (continued)

D. Type T (Standard Plan R-60-Series)

Description: Offset thrie beam rail, 8" offset blocks, 6'-3" post spacing, 34" height to top of rail.

Current Use: 1. Updating existing freeways and ramps

when the entire run of guardrail is not being removed and replaced.

E. Type TD (Standard Plan R-60-Series)

Description: Similar to Type T except beam elements and offset blocks are installed on both sides of the post.

Current Use: 1. Used to update existing Type TD guardrail

when the entire run of guardrail is not being removed and replaced.

F. Type MGS-8 (Standard Plan R-60-Series)

Description: W-beam guardrail meeting MASH criteria, 8" offset blocks, standard 6'-3" post spacing, and 31" height to top of rail. Beam element splices occur between standard 6'-3" post spaces.

Current Use: 1. Standard MASH-compliant guardrail for all

freeways (including ramps) and free access roadways. On projects let after December 31, 2017, Type MGS guardrail systems will be required for new guardrail installations on all freeways (including ramps) and free access roadways.

Page 23: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN

8.02

TITLE SHEET

Care should be taken to see that the notes appearing on the title sheet actually apply to the work being done on the project. Most of the standard notes included in the Design Manual relate to new construction. For rehabilitation projects the wording of some of these notes must be modified. Other notes are completely inappropriate and should be deleted.

A. The design of (this) (these) structure(s) (except the railroad overpass(es) (is) (are) based on current AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges (HS25) (HS20-44) (and alternate military*) loading. Live load plus impact deflection does not exceed (1/800) (1/1000) of span length (and (1/375) (1/300) of cantilever arm). The (Working Stress) (Load Factor) method of design was used for this structure. [*Use only for structures on interstate routes.]

(9-18-98)

B. The (reconstruction) (rehabilitation) design is based on current AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges (HS25) (HS20-44) (and alternate military*) loading. Live load plus impact deflection does not exceed (1/800) (1/1000) of span length (and 1/375) (1/300) of cantilever arm. The (Working Stress) (Load Factor) method was used for this design. The original structure was designed for (and alternate military) loading. [*Use only for structures on interstate routes.] [See Subsection 7.01.06 for deflection limits.] (9-18-98)

8.02 (continued)

C Except where otherwise indicated on these plans, or in the proposal and supplemental specifications contained herein, all materials and workmanship shall be according to the Michigan Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Construction Edition.

D. The stationing as shown on these plans for the intersection of the centerline of bridge and roadway (and the railroad) centerline is believed to be correct. It shall, however, be checked at the time of starting construction, and if the stationing shown on the plans is incorrect, it shall be reported to the Design office in Lansing, and the structure shall be staked out using the actual intersection of the centerline of bridge and roadway (and the railroad) centerline as the control point.

E. This contract is for "Structural Steel, , Furn and Fab" only. Other items of work indicated on these plans are not a part of this contract. [Use when structural steel furnishing and fabricating must be done early in project to ensure timely delivery for construction.] (12-5-2005)

F. The Regulated Waste Activity Identification Numbers for this project are as follows:

Control Section Number

[Use when hazardous material removal, cleaning or working on painted steel structure constructed prior to 1978 or when hydrodemolition is part of the project work. Place note directly above title block and use lettering twice the size of the other notes.] (9-18-98) (4-18-2016) (1-27-2020)

Page 24: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN - CHAPTER 8: LRFD

8.02 (continued)

TITLE SHEET

D. The stationing as shown on these plans for the intersection of the centerline of bridge and roadway (and the railroad) centerline is believed to be correct. It shall, however, be checked at the time of starting construction, and if the stationing shown on the plans is incorrect, it shall be reported to the Design office in Lansing, and the structure shall be staked out using the actual intersection of the centerline of bridge and roadway (and the railroad) centerline as the control point.

E. This contract is for "Structural Steel, , Furn and Fab" only. Other items of work indicated on these plans are not a part of this contract. [Use when structural steel furnishing and fabricating must be done early in project to ensure timely delivery for construction.] (12-5-2005)

F. The Regulated Waste Activity Identification Numbers for this project are as follows:

Control Section Number

[Use when hazardous material removal, cleaning or working on painted steel structure constructed prior to 1978 or when hydrodemolition is part of the project work. Place note directly above title block and use lettering twice the size of the other notes.] (9-18-98) (4-18-2016) (1-27-2020)

8.02 (continued)

G. The design of the structural members is based on material of the following grades and stresses:

Concrete: Grade S2, S2M, P1M * f'c = 3,000 psi Concrete: Grade D, DM * f'c = 4,000 psi Steel Reinforcement fy = 60,000 psi Steel Reinforcement: (Stirrups for Prestressed Beams fy = 60,000 psi) (Stirrups for (17”) (21”) Box Beams fy = 40,000 psi) Structural Steel: AASHTO M270 Grade 36 Fy = 36,000 psi Structural Steel: AASHTO M270 Grade 50 Fy = 50,000 psi Structural Steel: AASHTO M270 Grade 50W Fy = 50,000 psi Structural Steel Pins: ASTM A276 UNS Designation S20161 or S21800 Fy = 50,000 psi Temp Support Hanger Rods: ASTM A 193 Grade B7 (AISI 4140)

2½” and under Fu =125,000 psi Fy =105,000 psi

Over 2½” to 4” Fu =115,000 psi Fy = 95,000 psi

Over 4” to 7” Fu =100,000 psi Fy = 75,000 psi Prestressed Concrete f'c = psi Prestressed Concrete Compressive Strength at Release f'ci = psi [7000 psi max] Prestressing Strands fpu = 270,000 psi

[*Use Grade S2M, P1M and DM in all trunkline projects in Metro, University, Grand, Bay, Southwest and North Regions. Use Grade S2 and D in Superior Region and on non-trunkline projects.]

(12-5-2005) (11-28-2011) (11-24-2014) (10-17-2016) (1-29-2018)

Page 25: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN

CHAPTER 12

REHABILITATION PROJECTS

12.00

REHABILITATION PROJECTS (9-1-88)

For the purpose of this volume, the following definitions will be used:

Preventive maintenance work is defined as bridge activities that will repair and preserve the bridge. Projects where only this work is done do not have to include geometric enhancements. This is done with the understanding that future rehabilitation or reconstruction projects will contain appropriate safety and geometric enhancements, thus Design Exceptions / Variances are not required for preventive maintenance work. These activities include joint replacement, pin and hanger replacement, complete painting, zone painting, thin polymer overlays, deck patching, asphalt overlay, hot mix asphalt (HMA) cap and scour countermeasures. (9-2-2003) (2-21-2017)

Rehabilitation (3R) is defined as work undertaken to extend the service life of an existing bridge and to enhance highway safety. The intent of this work is to return a bridge to a condition of structural or functional adequacy. This work may include upgrading geometric features such as roadway (bridge) widening (no increase in number of through lanes), flattening curves, or improving sight distance. Examples of this work are shallow and deep concrete overlays, superstructure repairs, railing replacements, extensive substructure repair, and substructure replacement. (8-20-2009)

Reconstruction (4R) involves substantial changes to the existing structure such as bridge deck replacement or greater. See Chapter 7 for reconstruction (including deck replacements) projects requirements. (3-26-2012)

12.00 (continued)

Bridges to remain in place criteria occurs when a bridge carrying road project traffic falls within a road project and no work is planned for the bridge (see AASHTO publication, A Policy on Design Standards - Interstate System or A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2011, 6th Edition). If the bridge does not meet the criteria to “remain in place” the Road Designer shall submit any necessary design exceptions or design variances for the bridge. (3-26-2012) (3-21-2016) (8-22-2016) (2-21-2017)

With structure resurfacing, railing upgrading and joint replacement projects the structural adequacy of the superstructure shall be evaluated.

Structures being hydrodemolished, being painted (constructed prior to 1978) or when hazardous material removal are part of the project work need a Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy (MDEGLE) hazardous waste number. If a number exists in MiBRIDGE (web based structure management application) and begins with anything but “MIG” use this number on project Title Sheet (note 8.03 F). If number doesn’t exist or begins with “MIG” a new number must be requested from the Bridge Management Section, Bureau of Bridges and Structures. See also Section 14.04. (1-27-2020)

Page 26: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN

12.04 (continued)

12.04.04

Hydrodemolishing

Normally, the entire deck surface will be hydrodemolished regardless of the apparent extent of unsound concrete. This will assure removal of any undiscovered delaminations along with the layer of concrete having the highest chloride contamination. Any existing overlays or hot mix asphalt (HMA) patches must be removed, and the deck scarified, before beginning the first pass of hydrodemolishing. Calculate area with limits as reference lines and toes of barriers/curbs. Eliminate area of link slabs if they exist and add note 8.09.02 R. to plans. (12-5-2005)

Ideally, properly calibrated hydrodemolishing equipment will remove the specified depth of sound concrete and all unsound concrete. From experience, it is known that some unsound concrete will remain after one pass and the need for a second pass can be anticipated. The second pass area shall be estimated at 4% of the first pass. If the deck to be overlaid has an existing latex overlay, the second pass quantity will be estimated at 10% of the first pass. This is due to the greater difficulty in estimating the areas of unsound concrete. (5-1-2000)

Ensure that the structural capacity (design, legal and permit loading) for bridges during hydrodemolishing for rehabilitation/overlay projects will not be decreased. For further information regarding hydrodemolishing of variable depth concrete T-Beam bridges and precautions to take, please see the “Rehab Guidelines for T-Beam Structures” (https://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdot/Rehab_Guidelines_for_T­Beam_Structures_573338_7.pdf) reference document, located at the Bridge Operations, Bridge Management and Scoping website. (7-17-2017)

12.04.04 (continued)

Structures being hydrodemolished need a Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy (MDEGLE) hazardous waste number. If a number exists in MiBRIDGE (web-based structure management application) and begins with anything other than “MIG” use this number on project Title Sheet (note 8.03 F). If number doesn’t exist or begins with “MIG” a new number must be requested from the Bridge Management Section, Bureau of Bridges and Structures. See also Section 14.04. (1-27-2020)

12.04.05

Hand Chipping

When it is necessary to remove unsound concrete by hand chipping, the removal of the concrete will be divided into two categories:

A. Hand Chipping - Shallow: Where concrete removal is not required to be deeper than the midpoint of the top reinforcement, the concrete removal shall be bid as "Hand Chipping, Shallow."

B. Hand Chipping - Deep: Where concrete removal is required to be below the midpoint of the top reinforcement, the concrete removal shall be bid as "Hand Chipping, Deep."

Where bridge decks require hand chipping, the areas requiring it shall be indicated in a diagram included on the plans. Normally, the Engineer should increase the total area of delaminations shown on the maintenance report by 50 percent to arrive at the plan quantity for hand chipping. However, if spalled or delaminated areas occur in clusters, each cluster should be enclosed in an assumed area to be hand chipped. The total of the assumed areas should be increased by 20 percent to arrive at the plan quantity. (9-1-88)

Page 27: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN

12.07.04

End Diaphragms

(8-6-92) On field inspections of structures scheduled for painting, the designer should consider accessibility behind end diaphragms for cleaning and painting. If the end diaphragms are within 1'-2" of an abutment backwall (or if the end diaphragms at a pier are too close) and the slab above the diaphragms is not to be removed, the diaphragms shall be removed to permit proper cleaning and coating.

Plans shall include an acceptable system for shoring the slab while the diaphragm is not in place. It should be noted that the contractor may use an alternate shoring system subject to the engineer's approval.

Where end diaphragms must be removed for cleaning and painting, note 8.09.04 I should be placed on the plans and the Special Provision for Removal and Replacement of End Diaphragms should be included in the contract proposal. (8-20-2009)

12.07.05

Cleaning and Coating Exposed Steel

(8-6-92) Where structural steel has been exposed by the removal of deck concrete, it shall be cleaned and coated. Cleaning and Coating shall be according to the Standard Specifications for Construction or Special Provisions.

Construction sequencing (painting after casting deck) of deck replacement projects with steel beams requires the use of the pay item, “Top Flanges and Beam Ends, Clean and Coat”, even if the project requires total beam painting. (8-20-2009)

12.07.06

Performance Warranties for Bridge Painting (5-1-2000)

Whenever possible, performance warranties shall be required on bridge painting contracts. On non-National Highway System bridges (NHS) the Design units shall include the performance specification in the contract. A trunkline project can be considered non-NHS, even though it may have NHS funding, if the facility carried is non-NHS.

If the facility carried is NHS traffic, the performance warrantee specification may still be applicable. The Design units shall contact the Construction Field Services Coatings Specialist, at the preliminary plan stage, to determine whether the bridge can be added to Special Experimental Projects list for warranty painting. (3-26-2012)

12.07.07

Paint Color (5-1-2000)

The standard color for MDOT bridges is Light Gray. The AMS­STD-595 number for this color is 16440. Previously, the MDOT standard color was Light Blue - number 15488. Other colors may be recommended by the Region. (3-21-2016) (10-23-17) (12-26-2017)

12.07.08

MDEGLE Hazardous Waste Number (5-1-2000) (3-26-2012) (6-24-2019) (1-27-2020)

All structures scheduled for painting (constructed prior to 1978) need a Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy (MDEGLE) hazardous waste number. If a number exists in MiBRIDGE (web based structure management application) and begins with anything but “MIG” use this number on project Title Sheet (note 8.03 F). If number doesn’t exist or begins with “MIG” a new number must be requested from the Bridge Management Section, Bureau of Bridges and Structures. See also Section 14.04.

Page 28: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

VZ

BLT

PLAN

LONGITUDINAL APPROACH SECTION

ELEVATION

TOP OF BERM

TOP OF BERM

1 ON

2

PLAN

ED

GE

OF

PA

VE

ME

NT

REF. LINE

SH

OU

LD

ER

HI

NG

E

LI

NE

REF. LINE

\

RO

AD

WA

Y

\

RO

AD

WA

Y

ED

GE

OF

PA

VE

ME

NT

OBJ

EC

T

PR

OT

EC

TI

ON

GU

AR

DR

AI

L

ME

DI

AN

CU

RB

&

GU

TT

ER (

TY

P)

BRI

DG

E

AP

PR

OA

CH

1

ON

2

SH

OU

LD

ER

HI

NG

E

LI

NE

5'

PARTIAL BACKWALL DETAILS

INTEGRAL AND SEMI-INTEGRAL ABUTMENT

4.23.02

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:

APPROVED BY: BMW

DESIGN DIVISION

PREPARED BY

SUPERSEDES:02/14/11

ISSUED: 01/27/20

CHECKED BY:

pikkaw
Rectangle
pikkaw
Rectangle
Page 29: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

VZ

BLT

COUNTY ROAD OVER TRUNKLINES

RETURN WALL DETAILS

5.17.05

!

GUTTER

APPROACH

BA

RRI

ER

ABUTMENTBACKWALL1'-8

"

6"PAVEMENT

SEAT

!

BA

RRI

ER

BACKWALL1'-6

"

6"PAVEMENT

SEAT

3"

3"

ABUTMENT WALL

EXPANS

ION

JOINT

3"

45°

LINE

REF.

LINE

REF.

SECTION A-ADEPENDENT BACKWALL

DETAIL - SHOWING

INDEPENDENT BACKWALL

DETAIL - SHOWING

WHEN 70° ! 110° OMIT 3" BEVELS

JOINT STRAIGHT THROUGH BARRIER

WHEN 70° ! 110°, CARRY

LINE

REFERENCE

ANCHORAGE

GUARDRAIL

PLAN

TOP OF CURB

1 ON 2

IS USED

WHEN CURTAINWALL ABUTMENT

USE CURTAINWALL RETURNA

A

(OPTIONAL)

JOINT

CONSTRUCTION

WI

TH

OU

T

BE

RM

4'-

0"

WI

TH

BE

RM

2'-

6"

ELEVATION

HYBRID JOINT SEALING COMPOUND

POLYURETHANE OR POLYURETHANE

1" JOINT FILLER WITH

E3 JOINT

HYBRID JOINT SEALING COMPOUND

POLYURETHANE OR POLYURETHANE

•" JOINT FILLER WITH

HYBRID JOINT SEALING COMPOUND

POLYURETHANE OR POLYURETHANE

1" JOINT FILLER WITH

*

* *

VA

RI

AB

LE

VA

RI

AB

LE

JOINT SEALING COMPOUND

POLYURETHANE HYBRID

WITH POLYURETHANE OR

•" JOINT FILLER

AESTHETIC TREATMENT

BARRIER TYPE AND

DEPENDENT UPON

* DIMENSIONS VARIABLE,

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:

APPROVED BY: BMW

DESIGN DIVISION

PREPARED BY

SUPERSEDES:11/27/01

ISSUED: 01/27/20

CHECKED BY:

pikkaw
Rectangle
pikkaw
Rectangle
pikkaw
Rectangle
pikkaw
Rectangle
pikkaw
Rectangle
pikkaw
Rectangle
pikkaw
Rectangle
Page 30: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

6.20.01

VZ

BLT

SUPERSEDES:11/27/01

ISSUED: / /

TYP. SECTION THRU DEPENDENT BACKWALL

THERE WILL BE NO PAYMENT FOR THE REQUIRED JOINT WATERPROOFING. (USE WITH OPTIONAL JOINT).

IF A CONSTRUCTION JOINT IS USED, CAST THE LOWER PORTION OF THE BACKWALL PRIOR TO PLACING DECK REINFORCEMENT.

WATERPROOFING IS A PAY ITEM WHEN A CONSTRUCTION JOINT IS MANDATORY)

CAST LOWER PORTION OF THE BACKWALL PRIOR TO PLACING DECK REINFORCEMENT. (USE WITH MANDATORY JOINT) (JOINT

PLAN NOTES:

"D" (1'-8" MIN.)

6" "D" - 6"

1•"1ƒ" "D" - 9‚"

1'-0"

2"

EA04

BA

RS

@ 1'-0"

CE

NT

ER

S3"

FILLER

•" JT.

2'-0" (MIN.)

1'-8" (MIN.)

2'-0"

1•" BEVEL1'-8"

"D"- 4•"

e = 1'-0"

BE

AM

+

T - (1'-3")

5‚" "D"- 9ƒ"

1'-0"

f

= 1'-6"

BE

AM

+

T - 3"

(WI

TH

EL

AS

TO

ME

RI

C

PA

D

US

E)

BE

AM

+

T - 4•

"

ALONG BEAM BEARING \ *

EA060400 SPA. @ 2'-0"

a

b

d

c

1'-6" (MAX.)

EM04 BARS SPA. @

"D"- 11‚"

2•"

EM04 BAR

DOES NOT INCLUDE A PAVEMENT SEAT.

NOTE: USE AN EK04 BAR WHERE THE BACKWALL

65°

THAN

LESS

IN SLAB AND BACKWALL

CONSTRUCTION JOINT

BACKWALL JOINTS

MORE

OR

65°

(MIN.)

BACKWALL SECTION

WATERPROOFING

JOINT

UNDER BEAM FLANGE ***

BLOCK OUT CONCRETE

GIRDER

BEAM OR

** CONSTR. JT.

REF. LINE

EDGE

4 EA04 BARSREFERENCE LINE)

(PARALLEL TO

EA BARS

WATERPROOFING

JOINT

MI

N.

(A

PP

RO

X.)(

E.

S.)

HA

UN

CH

SL

AB

*** USE FOR SKEWED BRIDGES.

** THIS JOINT IS MANDATORY WHEN PLATE GIRDERS WITHOUT BEARING STIFFENERS ARE USED.OTHERWISE THE JOINT IS OPTIONAL.

* USE FOR STEEL BEAM BRIDGES ONLY.

ACCOMMODATE REINFORCEMENT IN SKEWED BACKWALLS.

HOLES IN WEB OF STRINGERS FOR BACKWALL REINFORCEMENT ON 90° JOBS SHOULD BE 1"!. INCREASE HOLE SIZE TO

(FOR SKEWED CROSSINGS)

2) 1'-8" OR THE BEARING DIMENSION PLUS THE PRODUCT OF • FLANGE WIDTH AND COSINE ANGLE OF CROSSING ---

1) 1'-8" OR THE BEARING DIMENSION PLUS • THE BEARING WIDTH --(FOR 90° CROSSINGS).

THE BACKWALL THICKNESS "D" IS THE GREATER OF:

BARS WITH PREFIX "E" ARE TO BE EPOXY COATED.

NOTE:

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:

APPROVED BY: BMW

DESIGN DIVISION

PREPARED BY

SUPERSEDES: / /

ISSUED: 01/27/20

CHECKED BY:

pikkaw
Rectangle
Page 31: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

VZ

BLT

NOTES:

OF SUPERSTRUCTURE CONCRETE.

APPROACH SLABS SHOULD BE CAST AT NIGHT WITH NIGHT TIME CASTING

2'-0" MIN. LAP

PLAN OF APPROACH

WITH BOTTOM MAT LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT.

BOTTOM MAT TRANSVERSE REINFORCEMENT AND TO THE BRIDGE DECK

ATTACH APPROACH CURB AND GUTTER TO THE APPROACH SLAB WITH

LINE.

POUR APPROACH SLABS FROM EXPANSION LOCATION TOWARD REFERENCE

FOR STEEL BEAM BRIDGES.

IS LESS THAN 50' FOR CONCRETE BEAM BRIDGES AND LESS THAN 25'

THE LENGTH OF BRIDGE CONTRIBUTING TO EXPANSION AT AN ABUTMENT

USE APPROACH SLAB DETAILS ON STANDARD PLAN R-45-SERIES WHEN

NOT EXCEED 10 PSI.

COMPACTORS. CONTACT PRESSURE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT SHALL

OF THE SLEEPER SLAB AFTER IT IS BUILT. USE ONLY HAND/PLATE

EQUIPMENT TO COMPACT THE SUBGRADE, SUBBASE, AND BASE WITHIN 10'

DO NOT USE WHEELED, ROLLER BASED OR MACHINE MOUNTED COMPACTION

PLAN NOTE:

SLAB DETAILS

INDEPENDENT BACKWALL SLIDING

6.20.03B

IN DECK

EA BARS

(TOP & BOTTOM)

EA06 BARS SPA @ 1"-0" MAX.

SKEW ANGLE GREATER THAN 30°

90°

SEE BRIDGE DESIGN GUIDE 6.20.04C

SLEEPER SLAB

SKEW ANGLE

6'-6"

MIN.

*

BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION \

REF LINE

REF PT

OR SAWED JOINT IN SLAB

OPTIONAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT

(MEASURED ALONG \) AS PROJECT AND GEOMETRIC LIMITATIONS ALLOW.

THE DESIGNER SHOULD MAKE THE APPROACH SLAB AS NEAR TO 20'

* FOR DESIGN SPEEDS GREATER THAN 45 MPH (POSTED 40 MPH), V

NO TRANSITION WITH VERTICAL RAILING OR ENDWALL **

BEGINNING BRIDGE APPROACH CURB & GUTTER.

** CONSIDER EXTENDING BARRIER TO SLEEPER SLAB THEN

IN DECK

EA BARS

BRIDGE APPROACH GUTTER

BRIDGE APPROACH GUTTER

1'-0" AT ENDS)

(STAGGER ALTERNATE BARS

TOP & BOTTOM MAT EA06 BARS

FAN 5 EA051000 BARS BETWEEN

TO GUTTER

2'-0" MIN. LAP

-

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:

APPROVED BY: BMW

DESIGN DIVISION

PREPARED BY

SUPERSEDES:10/19/15

ISSUED: 01/27/20

CHECKED BY:

pikkaw
Rectangle
Page 32: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

VZ

BLT

NOTES:

OF SUPERSTRUCTURE CONCRETE.

APPROACH SLABS SHOULD BE CAST AT NIGHT WITH NIGHT TIME CASTING

PLAN OF APPROACH

LINE.

POUR APPROACH SLABS FROM EXPANSION LOCATION TOWARD REFERENCE

NOT EXCEED 10 PSI.

COMPACTORS. CONTACT PRESSURE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT SHALL

OF THE SLEEPER SLAB AFTER IT IS BUILT. USE ONLY HAND/PLATE

EQUIPMENT TO COMPACT THE SUBGRADE, SUBBASE, AND BASE WITHIN 10'

DO NOT USE WHEELED, ROLLER BASED OR MACHINE MOUNTED COMPACTION

PLAN NOTE:

SLAB DETAILS

INDEPENDENT BACKWALL SLIDING

6.20.03C

REF LINE

REF PT

(TOP & BOTTOM)

EA06 BARS SPA @ 1"-0" MAX.

SKEW ANGLE 30° OR LESS

SKEW ANGLE

*

BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION \

OR SAWED JOINT IN SLAB

OPTIONAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT

MIN.

6'-6

"

(MEASURED ALONG \) AS PROJECT AND GEOMETRIC LIMITATIONS ALLOW.

THE DESIGNER SHOULD MAKE THE APPROACH SLAB AS NEAR TO 20'

* FOR DESIGN SPEEDS GREATER THAN 45 MPH (POSTED 40 MPH), V

IN DECK

EA BARS

BRIDGE APPROACH GUTTER

IN DECK

EA BARS

SEE BRIDGE DESIGN GUIDE 6.20.04C

SLEEPER SLAB

(TYP)

EDGE OF STUB/END OF SLAB

EXTEND BRIDGE RAILING TO

2'-0" MIN. LAP

BOTTOM MAT ONLY

BRIDGE APPROACH GUTTER

-

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:

APPROVED BY: BMW

DESIGN DIVISION

PREPARED BY

SUPERSEDES:10/19/15

ISSUED: 01/27/20

CHECKED BY:

pikkaw
Rectangle
Page 33: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

VZ

BLT

PARTIAL BACKWALL DETAILS

INTEGRAL AND SEMI-INTEGRAL ABUTMENT

6.20.04A

INCLUDED IN THE BID ITEM "SUPERSTRUCTURE CONC, NIGHT CASTING".

MATERIALS, LABOR AND EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO PLACE THE GROUT ARE

GROUT BARS IN BEAMS PRIOR TO CASTING BACKWALL, ALL GROUT AND

NOTE:

3"

(NS & FS)

EA08 BARS

3"

3" 3"EM04 BARS

TOP/BOLSTER

3" 3"EM04 BARS

SLAB FASCIA

CONST \

BRIDGE

TOP/SLAB4'-0" MIN LAP

EA08 BARS (TYP)

(TYP ALL BAYS)

EA08 BARS (NS)

(TYP ALL BAYS)

EA08 BARS (NS)

(TYP @ FASCIA)

EK04 BARS

EA08 BARS (NS)

PARTIAL BACKWALL ELEVATION

SIMILAR FOR STEEL BEAM BRIDGES

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:

APPROVED BY: BMW

DESIGN DIVISION

PREPARED BY

SUPERSEDES:11/27/01

ISSUED: 01/27/20

CHECKED BY:

pikkaw
Rectangle
Page 34: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

VZ

BLT

6.29.11

BARRIER RAILING WITH EXPANSION JOINT

JOINT DETAIL FOR BRIDGE

EXPANSION JOINT DEVICE EJ3

\ EXPANSION JOINT WITH

\ BEAM

2'-

0"

TO

2'-

6"

8"

6‡

"

TY

PE

6

TY

PE

7

1'-

"

1'-

2•

"

TY

PE

6

TY

PE

7

3"

3"

1•

"

45°!

SLAB FASCIA

DECK SLAB

SEE EJ3 STANDARD SHEET FOR EXPANSION JOINT DEVICE DETAILS

JOINT WITH EJ3 EXPANSION JOINT

PLAN VIEW

BY EXPANSION JOINT

OPENING SIZE AS REQUIRED

+

2•

"

+

2•

"**

7†

"

*

"

ƒ" BEVEL TYP.

** 8†" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING AESTHETIC TYPE 7, DET 2

* 10ƒ" BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING AESTHETIC TYPE 6, DET 2

SHOULDER WIDTHS. DISTANCE TO BE DETAILED ON THE PLANS.

TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEED FOR INCREASED OR MAINTAINING

1•" (FROM 2•") AND TOE OF BARRIER SHIFTED ACCORDINGLY

+ BACK OF BARRIER TO SLAB FASCIA MAY BE DECREASED TO

EXPANSION JOINT DEVICE EJ3

\ EXPANSION JOINT WITH

\ BEAM

2'-

0"

TO

2'-

6"

1'-

0"

3"

3"

1•

"

45°!

SLAB FASCIA

DECK SLAB

SEE EJ3 STANDARD SHEET FOR EXPANSION JOINT DEVICE DETAILS

JOINT WITH EJ3 EXPANSION JOINT

PLAN VIEW

BY EXPANSION JOINT

OPENING SIZE AS REQUIRED

OMIT 1•" BEVELS

WHEN 70° ! 110°

ƒ" BEVEL TYP.

1•

"

RAI

LI

NG

PA

RA

PE

T

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:

APPROVED BY: BMW

DESIGN DIVISION

PREPARED BY

SUPERSEDES:12/16/19

ISSUED: 01/27/20

CHECKED BY:

pikkaw
Rectangle
Page 35: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

VZ

BLT

6.60.03A

2"

CL

R

EL04 BAR

EA06 BAR (TYP)

CONTINUOUS

49"

TOP STRAND

BEAM REINFORCEMENT

BULB TEE

2'-0" OR 2'-4"

1'-2"

1'-0" OR

1'-2"

1'-0" OR

EA040310 *

1•" CLR

1‚" CLR

EF030608

EC030206 AND EF030608 BARS COMBINE TO FORM STIRRUP.

NOTE:

36", 4

2", 4

8", 5

4", 6

0", 6

6", 7

2"

DE

PT

H

11"

1'-

2•

"

EC030206

1‚" CLR

1‚" CLR

1‚

"

CL

R

ED

04

12

05

3" (

TY

P)

"

OR

3

EQ

UA

L

SP

AC

ES (

60", 6

6", 7

2"

BE

AM)

2

EQ

UA

L

SP

AC

ES (

36", 4

2", 4

8", 5

4"

BE

AM)

3"

4•

"

<

61"

EK040410 *

(OPTIONAL)

TOP STRAND (TYP)

SEE GUIDE 6.60.03B.

USE EA040410 AND EK040510 WITH BLOCKOUT REMOVAL / 61" TOP FLANGE,

* ALTERNATE EK04 WITH EA04 BARS IF REQUIRED FOR SHEAR/COMPOSITE ACTION.

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:

APPROVED BY: BMW

CHECKED BY:

DESIGN DIVISION

PREPARED BY

SUPERSEDES:04/17/17

ISSUED: 01/27/20

pikkaw
Rectangle
Page 36: Road & Bridge Design Publications - Michigan · Road & Bridge Design Publications Monthly Update – January 2020 1 Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below

VZ

BLT

6.60.03B

8ƒ"

5•"

4•" !

3" !

ELO4 BAR

SIDE VIEWEND VIEW

72"

FO

R

72"

BE

AM

DE

PT

H

66"

FO

R

66"

BE

AM

DE

PT

H

60"

FO

R

60"

BE

AM

DE

PT

H

54"

FO

R

54"

BE

AM

DE

PT

H

48"

FO

R

48"

BE

AM

DE

PT

H

42"

FO

R

42"

BE

AM

DE

PT

H

36"

FO

R

36"

BE

AM

DE

PT

H

ISOMETRIC VIEW

BEAM REINFORCEMENT

BULB TEE

7"

5'-11"

3•" !

ED041205

4•

"

3'-10"

4'-10" (BLOCKOUT REMOVAL)

(EA040410)

EA040310

2'-10"

OR BLOCKOUT REMOVAL

USE FOR SHEAR/COMPOSITE ACTION

(EK040510)

EK040410

7"

5"

8‰

"

1'-6

"

1'-4ˆ"

63°

EC030206

EF030608

3•

"

5•"

10•"

1'-0

"

5•

"

27°

(BLOCKOUT REMOVAL)

3'-10"

3'-1•""

BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDRAWN BY:

APPROVED BY: BMW

CHECKED BY:

DESIGN DIVISION

PREPARED BY

SUPERSEDES:04/17/17

ISSUED: 01/27/20

pikkaw
Rectangle