1
RNECE: Regional Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Centers of Excellence Priorities for research • Address the policy, systems and/or environmental aspects of the rural communities of the North Central region • Address the specific needs of immigrant, minority and/or other at-risk populations in this region • Strengthen the evidence base on effective nutrition-education/obesity-prevention programs for diverse groups, notably SNAP-Ed and EFNEP Funded in part by Eat Smart in Parks: Photovoice to Inform Health Food Environments Sonja Wilhelm Stanis; Cindy DeBlauw; Kimberly Keller; Amy Dunaway; Natalie Hampton University of Missouri Objectives: • Strengthen community voices in healthy food decisions for parks • Include youth voices in food decisions • Help mobilize youth to improve access to healthy park food in underserved communities Evaluating a Multi-Modal Community Nutrition Education Model Within SNAP- Ed and EFNEP Jennifer McCaffrey; Naiman Khan; Ruopeng An; Dawn Contreras; Marci Scott University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Objectives: • Examine organizational structure and policy dynamics in relation to program effectiveness using social network analysis in Illinois and Michigan • Examine the impact of the University of Illinois Extension SNAP-Ed and EFNEP on diet-related and physical activity behaviors of participants as well as their home food environment, weight status and adiposity SWEAT: Summer Weight Environmental Assessment Trial Carolyn Gunther; Laura Hopkins; Christine Penicka; Student; Blake Jones; Carly Evich Ohio State University/Purdue University Objectives: • Hypotheses: Compared to the active control, children randomized to the two types of intervention groups—standard care and enhanced care—will demonstrate: - Improved diet - Decreased sedentary time - Prevention of unhealthy weight gain Does SNAP-Ed Affect Food Security Differentially in Urban and Rural Environments? A Longitudinal, Randomized and Controlled Study Heather A. Eicher-Miller; Melissa K. Maulding; Bruce A. Craig; Dennis A. Savaiano; Rebecca L. Rivera Purdue University Objectives: • Investigate SNAP-Ed effect on household food security among adults ≥18 years who qualify for SNAP - Whether changes are differential in rural/urban counties using a longitudinal (1-year), randomized and controlled study design with SNAP-Ed as the intervention • Determine how the availability of nutrition-related community resources moderates the effect of SNAP- Ed on food security - Whether the effect is dose-dependent • Determine the individual impact of factors associated with improvements in food security through integration of direct and policy, systems and environmental (PSE) SNAP-Ed approaches The Influence of Policy, System and Environmental Nutrition Education Intervention on Foods and Beverages Served at Diverse, Low-Income Home Child Care Provider Settings Dawn Earnesty; Lorraine Weatherspoon Michigan State University Objectives: • To improve the nutritional variety and quality of meals and snacks served to 2- to 5-year-old children in diverse, SNAP-Ed child care provider homes • To strengthen the evidence base of a PSE change intervention for child care providers using a six- month extension coaching model Food and Activity Environment Perceptions Among SNAP-Ed and EFNEP Participants in the North Central Region Bhagyashree Katare; Krystal Lynch; Melissa Maulding; Dennis Savaiano; North Central Steering Committee Objectives: • To develop a system/tool to assess people’s perceptions of surrounding food and physical activity environment and their health behavior, health choices and health outcome • To assess participants’ current perception of their food and physical activity environment • To evaluate the relationship between people’s present perception of environment and their health behaviors and outcomes P u b l i c P o l i c y n a t i o n a l , s t a t e , l o c a l l a w s a n d r e g u l a t i o n s C o m m u n i t y r e l a t i o n s h i p s b e t w e e n o r g a n i z a t i o n s O r g a n i z a t i o n a l o r g a n i z a t i o ns , s o c i a l i n s t i t u t i o n s f a m i l i e s , f r i e n d s , s o c i a l n e t w o r ds I n t e r p e r s o n a l Individual knowledge, attitudes, skills Socioeconomic Environment; Rural/Urban Transportation; Food Environment Community Assistance Programs Direct SNAP-Ed Household Food Security Social-Ecological Model: Multiple levels or systems influence behavior; behavior is shaped and can shape the social environment United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service National Institute of Food and Agriculture This work is supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Food and Nutrition Service and National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the USDA. Leadership: Dennis Savaiano, Purdue University Director and Research Coordinator Marci Scott, Michigan Fitness Foundation Associate Director—Implementation Jo Britt-Rankin, University of Missouri Associate Director—Communications Dawn Contreras, Michigan State University Associate Director—Center Assessment

RNECE: Regional Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention ...extension.missouri.edu/hes/asnnaconference/2017/PosterRNECE.pdfNutrition Service National Institute of Food and Agriculture

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: RNECE: Regional Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention ...extension.missouri.edu/hes/asnnaconference/2017/PosterRNECE.pdfNutrition Service National Institute of Food and Agriculture

RNECE: Regional Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Centers of Excellence

Priorities for research• Address the policy, systems and/or environmental

aspects of the rural communities of the North Central region

• Address the specific needs of immigrant, minority and/or other at-risk populations in this region

• Strengthen the evidence base on effective nutrition-education/obesity-prevention programs for diverse groups, notably SNAP-Ed and EFNEP

Funded in part by

Eat Smart in Parks: Photovoice to Inform Health Food EnvironmentsSonja Wilhelm Stanis; Cindy DeBlauw; Kimberly Keller; Amy Dunaway; Natalie Hampton

University of Missouri

Objectives:

• Strengthen community voices in healthy food decisions for parks

• Include youth voices in food decisions

• Help mobilize youth to improve access to healthy park food in underserved communities

Evaluating a Multi-Modal Community Nutrition Education Model Within SNAP-Ed and EFNEPJennifer McCaffrey; Naiman Khan; Ruopeng An; Dawn Contreras; Marci Scott

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Objectives:

• Examine organizational structure and policy dynamics in relation to program effectiveness using social network analysis in Illinois and Michigan

• Examine the impact of the University of Illinois Extension SNAP-Ed and EFNEP on diet-related and physical activity behaviors of participants as well as their home food environment, weight status and adiposity

SWEAT: Summer Weight Environmental Assessment Trial Carolyn Gunther; Laura Hopkins; Christine Penicka; Student; Blake Jones; Carly Evich

Ohio State University/Purdue University

Objectives:

• Hypotheses: Compared to the active control, children randomized to the two types of intervention groups—standard care and enhanced care—will demonstrate:

- Improved diet

- Decreased sedentary time

- Prevention of unhealthy weight gain

Does SNAP-Ed Affect Food Security Differentially in Urban and Rural Environments? A Longitudinal, Randomized and Controlled StudyHeather A. Eicher-Miller; Melissa K. Maulding; Bruce A. Craig; Dennis A. Savaiano; Rebecca L. Rivera

Purdue University

Objectives:

• Investigate SNAP-Ed effect on household food security among adults ≥18 years who qualify for SNAP

- Whether changes are differential in rural/urban counties using a longitudinal (1-year), randomized and controlled study design with SNAP-Ed as the intervention

• Determine how the availability of nutrition-related community resources moderates the effect of SNAP-Ed on food security

- Whether the effect is dose-dependent

• Determine the individual impact of factors associated with improvements in food security through integration of direct and policy, systems and environmental (PSE) SNAP-Ed approaches

The Influence of Policy, System and Environmental Nutrition Education Intervention on Foods and Beverages Served at Diverse, Low-Income Home Child Care Provider SettingsDawn Earnesty; Lorraine Weatherspoon

Michigan State University

Objectives:

• To improve the nutritional variety and quality of meals and snacks served to 2- to 5-year-old children in diverse, SNAP-Ed child care provider homes

• To strengthen the evidence base of a PSE change intervention for child care providers using a six-month extension coaching model

Food and Activity Environment Perceptions Among SNAP-Ed and EFNEP Participants in the North Central RegionBhagyashree Katare; Krystal Lynch; Melissa Maulding; Dennis Savaiano; North Central Steering Committee

Objectives:

• To develop a system/tool to assess people’s perceptions of surrounding food and physical activity environment and their health behavior, health choices and health outcome

• To assess participants’ current perception of their food and physical activity environment

• To evaluate the relationship between people’s present perception of environment and their health behaviors and outcomes

Pub

lic P

olicy

national, state, local laws and regulations

Com

mun

ity relationships between organizations

Org

anizat

ional o

rganizations, social institutions

fam

ilies, f

riends, social networds

Interpersonal

Individual knowledge,

attitudes, skills

Socioeconomic Environment; Rural/Urban

Transportation; Food Environment

Community Assistance Programs

Direct SNAP-Ed

Household Food Security

Social-Ecological Model:Multiple levels or systems influence behavior; behavior is shaped and can shape the social environment

United States Department of Agriculture

Food and Nutrition Service

National Institute of Food and Agriculture

This work is supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Food and Nutrition Service and National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the USDA.

Leadership: Dennis Savaiano, Purdue UniversityDirector and Research Coordinator

Marci Scott, Michigan Fitness FoundationAssociate Director—Implementation

Jo Britt-Rankin, University of MissouriAssociate Director—Communications

Dawn Contreras, Michigan State University Associate Director—Center Assessment