41
Harry Roberts Harry Roberts Coastal Studies Institute Coastal Studies Institute School of the Coast and Environment School of the Coast and Environment Louisiana State University Louisiana State University River Diversions: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Conditions and Other Considerations Considerations

River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

  • Upload
    mareo

  • View
    22

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations. Harry Roberts Coastal Studies Institute School of the Coast and Environment Louisiana State University. Louisiana’s Coastal Land Loss: A Regional Geology Problem. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Harry Roberts Harry Roberts Coastal Studies InstituteCoastal Studies Institute

School of the Coast and EnvironmentSchool of the Coast and EnvironmentLouisiana State UniversityLouisiana State University

River Diversions:River Diversions:Geological Boundary Conditions Geological Boundary Conditions

and Other Considerationsand Other Considerations

Page 2: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Louisiana’s Coastal Land Loss: A Regional Geology Problem

Mississippi Delta Land Loss and Gain

USGS

Page 3: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

• Crustal Downwarping

• Compaction-Dewatering of Young Deposits

• Faulting

• Decreasing Sediment Supply-Increasing Accommodation

Key Geologic Factors in Land Loss

Page 4: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

River Diversions: River Diversions: Best Hope for Off-Setting Best Hope for Off-Setting

Coastal Land LossCoastal Land Loss

Page 5: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

When the Scale of Coastal Land Loss is Considered — Sediment Availability is a Problem

USGS

Page 6: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Sediment Storage in Sediment Storage in the System Before the System Before

Human Intervention Human Intervention

Page 7: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

VicksburgVicksburg

Baton RougeBaton Rouge

New MadridNew Madrid

MemphisMemphis

New OrleansNew Orleans

MississippiMississippiincised valleyincised valley

The Lower The Lower Mississippi River Mississippi River

and Deltaand Delta

• Glacial-period Glacial-period braided streams braided streams within incised within incised valleyvalley

• Holocene valley Holocene valley filling and delta filling and delta constructionconstruction

• Valley fill reflects Valley fill reflects interactions interactions between climate between climate and sea-level and sea-level changechange

Post-Glacial Alluvium and Deltaic Sediments = ~60.500 km2

Post-Glacial Alluvium and Deltaic Sediments = ~60.500 km2

Page 8: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Longitudinal Profile of the Longitudinal Profile of the Lower Mississippi Valley and DeltaLower Mississippi Valley and Delta

Tracing Late Pleistocene Braided Streams into the Tracing Late Pleistocene Braided Streams into the Subsurface Using Base of Backswamp DepositsSubsurface Using Base of Backswamp Deposits

Based on 325 USACE boreholes from Blum et al. (2008)

braided stream deposits

Page 9: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Lower Mississippi Valley and DeltaMagnitude of Post-Glacial Deposition

Total storage = 1860-2300 km3 or 2790-3450 BT of sedimentStorage rate = ~230-290 MT/yr over 12,000 yr post-glacial period

sediment isopachs adapted from Kulp (2000)sediment isopachs adapted from Kulp (2000)

Balize Delta > 100 m Thick

Page 10: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Mississippi River Discharges and Mississippi River Discharges and Sediment StorageSediment Storage

Pre-DamPre-DamSediment Load*: ~400 – 500 MT/yrSediment Load*: ~400 – 500 MT/yrMean Sediment Storage**: Mean Sediment Storage**:

230 – 290 MT/yr 230 – 290 MT/yr

1976-20061976-2006Mississippi & Atchafalaya Sediment Mississippi & Atchafalaya Sediment

Load: ~205 MT/yrLoad: ~205 MT/yr

*Suspended Sediment Load Meade et al. (1990); *Suspended Sediment Load Meade et al. (1990); Kesel et al. (1992) **Avg. over 12 kyrsKesel et al. (1992) **Avg. over 12 kyrs

Page 11: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Lower Mississippi River Sediment LoadLower Mississippi River Sediment LoadPre- and Post-Dam LoadsPre- and Post-Dam Loads

Data courtesy of USGS Baton Rouge

Modern post-dam sediment loads are ~65% of the long-Modern post-dam sediment loads are ~65% of the long-term mean storage component alone term mean storage component alone

Data courtesy of USGS Baton Rouge

230-290 MT/yr

Page 12: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Projections of Projections of Sea-Level Rise and Sea-Level Rise and

SubsidenceSubsidence

Increasing AccommodationIncreasing Accommodation

Page 13: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Global Sea-Level RiseGlobal Sea-Level RiseSea-Level Change Data and ProjectionsSea-Level Change Data and Projections

Satelliteobservations

Tide-gaugeobservations

from IPCC 2007

~1mm/yr ~1.7 – 2.0 mm/yr

~3.0 mm/yr

Page 14: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Coastal Plain GPS Vertical Velocities

Page 15: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Coastal Plain Elevations

Page 16: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Projected Submergence: 2000 vs 2100

Page 17: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Baton RougeBaton Rouge

LafayetteLafayette

Projected future land loss of 10,500-13,500 km2

The Louisiana Coast in 2100?

New accommodation ~12-16 km3

(Requires ~18-24 BT to fill accommodation)

New New OrleansOrleans

Page 18: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

New New OrleansOrleans

Baton RougeBaton Rouge

LafayetteLafayette

Projected future land loss of 10,500-13,500 km2

1400-1800 km2

with 50% ofsediment

load

The Louisiana Coast in 2100?

Mass balance Mass balance considerations considerations present tough choices present tough choices for diversion for diversion scenariosscenarios

Page 19: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

A Goal of River Diversions:A Goal of River Diversions:Maximize Retention of Sediment Maximize Retention of Sediment

Within the Coastal PlainWithin the Coastal Plain

Page 20: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Fundamental Questions: River Diversions

• How are the sediments partitioned within the coastal-shelf system?

• What is the sediment retention capability in the delta and adjacent marshland?

• What are the important processes linked to sediment transport to the delta-marsh-offshore?

• How are the sediments partitioned within the coastal-shelf system?

• What is the sediment retention capability in the delta and adjacent marshland?

• What are the important processes linked to sediment transport to the delta-marsh-offshore?

Page 21: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Primary Physical Process Data Collection Sites

Delta ADCP

Page 22: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Big Hog Bayou Cross-Channel ADCP Site

Page 23: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Partitioning of Discharge: Wax Lake Delta

Page 24: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Important Positive Impacts of Important Positive Impacts of Hurricanes, Tropical Storms Hurricanes, Tropical Storms

and Cold Frontsand Cold Fronts

Page 25: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Hurricane Isaac

Page 26: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Delta Side-Looking ADCP

Page 27: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Tropical Storm Lee

September 4, 2011

Page 28: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Primary Physical Process Data Collection Sites

Delta ADCP

Page 29: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Wax Lake Outlet ADCP, Current Speed (cm/s)

Page 30: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Marsh Accretion Study Site

MM11

MM22

MM33

Page 31: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Marsh Grass Pushed Over by Water from Big Hog Bayou

Page 32: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Sediment Accretion

Inland Marsh Site M1Inland Marsh Site M1 Wax Lake Delta Site 9Wax Lake Delta Site 9

4 cm / 6 months4 cm / 6 months 1.5 cm / 5 months1.5 cm / 5 months

Page 33: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Impact of Cold Fronts:Impact of Cold Fronts:Less Energetic but More Less Energetic but More

Frequent than Tropical StormsFrequent than Tropical Storms

Page 34: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Rising Flood and Cold Fronts Form Synergistic Sediment Delivery Processes

Page 35: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Cold Front Modulation of Sediment Transport

• Prefrontal:

– Onshore Winds

– Water Level Set-Up

– Onshore Sediment Transport

• Prefrontal:

– Onshore Winds

– Water Level Set-Up

– Onshore Sediment Transport

• Postfrontal:

– Offshore Winds

– Water Level Set-Down

– Offshore Sediment Transport

• Postfrontal:

– Offshore Winds

– Water Level Set-Down

– Offshore Sediment Transport

Page 36: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Big Hog Bayou, Side-Looking ADCP, Current Speed (cm/s)

Page 37: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Water Level Demeaned and Offset with Wind Speed

Page 38: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

What Are Implications of What Are Implications of River Diversion Locations?River Diversion Locations?

Page 39: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Prefrontal Conditions

RESULT: Marshward Transport of Sediment (20-30 times/year)RESULT: Marshward Transport of Sediment (20-30 times/year)

Page 40: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Postfrontal Conditions

RESULT: Sediment Deposition, Marsh Substrate Accretion, Nutrient LoadingRESULT: Sediment Deposition, Marsh Substrate Accretion, Nutrient Loading

Page 41: River Diversions: Geological Boundary Conditions and Other Considerations

Project Results Suggest:

Placement of River Diversions in Landward

Parts of Interdistributary Basins Will

Maximize Sediment Retention Through

Landward Suspended Sediment Transport

by Cold-Front-Related Processes.

Placement of River Diversions in Landward

Parts of Interdistributary Basins Will

Maximize Sediment Retention Through

Landward Suspended Sediment Transport

by Cold-Front-Related Processes.