Upload
lamnhu
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CRITICALREVIEWOFTHEREGIONALCUMULATIVEEFFECTSASSESSMENT(RCEA)FORHYDROELECTRICDEVELOPMENTSONTHECHURCHILL,BURNTWOODANDNELSONRIVERSYSTEMSPreparedforthePublicInterestLawCentre,Winnipeg,ManitobaSeptember29,2017Preparedby:JillBlakley,PhD,MCIP,RPPAyodeleOlagunju,PhD,PMP
| P a g e
2
TABLEOFCONTENTSAcknowledgments
3
Acronyms 41.0Introduction
5
1.1Backgroundandobjectives 51.2Qualificationsoftheauthors 61.3Reportformat 82.0RegionalCumulativeEffectsAssessment
8
2.1Whatisregionalcumulativeeffectsassessment? 82.2Whyisitimportanttoassessregional-scalecumulativeeffects? 102.3Whatarethekeyelementsofregionalcumulativeeffectsassessment? 143.0ApproachtoReviewandReviewCriteria
18
4.0SynthesisofKeyFindingsandObservations4.1Whatwasdonereasonablywell?
2223
4.2Whereareimprovementsneeded? 244.3KeyrecommendationstoimprovetheManitobaandManitobaHydroRCEAinitiative
4.3.1RecommendationsspecifictotheRCEAfiling4.3.2RecommendationsforastrategicRCEAinnorthernManitoba
262728
Appendix:DetailedAnalysisoftheRCEAFiling
29
A.CoreandmethodologicalprinciplesB.MethodologicalapproachC.Cumulativeeffectsassessment
293233
ScopeRetrospectiveAnalysisProspectiveAnalysisManagement
34414950
References
52
| P a g e
3
ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWewouldliketoacknowledgeDr.BramF.Noble’ssignificantcontributiontoearlierversionsofthereviewcriteriausedinthisreport.
| P a g e
4
ACRONYMSCAC ConsumersAssociationofCanada
CCME CanadianCouncilofMinistersoftheEnvironment
CEA CumulativeEffectsAssessment
CEC CleanEnvironmentCommission
CRD ChurchillRiverDiversion
LWR LakeWinnipegRegulation
NFA NorthernFloodAgreement
RCEA RegionalCumulativeEffectsAssessment
ROI RegionofInterest
RSC RegionalStudyComponents
VEC ValuedEcosystemComponents
| P a g e
5
1.0INTRODUCTION1.1BackgroundandobjectivesCallsforaregionalcumulativeeffectsassessment(RCEA)innorthernManitobahavebeenongoingformorethanadecade.Throughanumberofrecentpublichearingsregardingvariousproposednewhydroelectricdevelopments“...itbecameapparentthatpasthydroelectricdevelopmentsinnorthernManitobahavehadaprofoundimpactoncommunitiesintheareaoftheseprojects,aswellasontheenvironmentupstreamanddownstream”1.InSeptember2004,aspartoftheWuskwatimGenerationandTransmissionProjectpublichearings,theManitobaCleanEnvironmentCommission(CEC)recommendedthat2:
TheGovernmentofManitobashouldundertakearegionalplanninginitiativeinnorthernManitobaandontheeastsideofLakeWinnipeg,toaddressexistingandfuturehydroelectricandotherdevelopments…Acooperativeregionalplanningapproachwouldbemoreappropriatetoassessthecumulativeeffectsofpast,presentandfuturedevelopmentsinnorthernManitoba.TheCommissionfurthernotesthatthereispotentialforastrategicenvironmentalassessmentapproachtofutureplanninganddevelopmentinnorthernManitobathatincludeshydroelectricdevelopmentalongwithfuturemining,transportation,infrastructureandrelatedprojects(Recommendation7.4.4).
InNovember2012,GunnandNoble3reviewedthecumulativeeffectsassessmentpreparedfortheBipoleIIItransmissionprojectandfoundtheapproachdismissiveofthecumulativeeffectsoftheprojectincombinationwiththeeffectsofotherpast,currentandfutureandprospectiveprojectsandactivities.Inotherwords,theBipoleIIIproject’simpactswereoften‘comparedto’theeffectsofotheractions,versus‘inadditionto’anypastchangesinvaluedecosystemcomponent(VEC)conditionsand‘inadditionto’theeffectsofothercurrentandfutureactions.Asaresult,theyalsorecommendedthat:
…theGovernmentofManitobaundertakeimmediatelyaregional-strategicenvironmentalassessmentofthecumulativeeffectsofcurrentandfuturelanduses,particularlyinthenorthernportionoftheBipoleIIIstudyarea.
Shortlythereafter,inits2013reportontheBipoleIIIProjectpublichearingprocess,theCECagainrecommendedthat:
ManitobaHydro,incooperationwiththeManitobaGovernment,conductaRegionalCumulativeEffectsAssessment[RCEA]forallManitobaHydroprojectsandassociatedinfrastructureintheNelsonRiversub-watershed;andthatthisbeundertakenpriortothe
1 CEC2013.ReportonPublicHearings:BipoleIIITransmissionProject,pg.126 2 CEC2002.ReportonPublicHearings:WuskwatimGenerationandTransmissionProject,pg.119 3 GunnandNoble2012,pg.16
| P a g e
6
licensingofanyadditionalprojectsintheNelsonRiversub-watershedaftertheBipoleIIIproject(Recommendation13.2).
ThisrecommendationwasacceptedbyManitobaandaTermsofReferenceforaRCEAofhydroelectricdevelopmentswasagreedtobyManitobaandManitobaHydroinMay2014.ThescopefortheRCEAwasexpandedtoincludeareasbeyondthatidentifiedintheCommission'srecommendationtoincludetheChurchill,BurntwoodandNelsonRiversystems.Thestudywascompletedintwophases.ThefirstphasewascompletedinMay2014,andincludedacompilationofavailabledataandadescriptionoftheassessmentapproachtobeusedtoanalyzethedatainthesecondphase.OnAugust20,2015,termsofreferencewereissuedtotheCECtoconductpublicoutreachmeetingsregardingtheRCEAoftheChurchill,BurntwoodandNelsonRiversystems.ThesecondphasereportwascompletedinDecember2015. ThepurposeofthisreviewistoprovideanindependentassessmentoftheManitobaandManitobaHydroRCEAtotheManitobaCleanEnvironmentCommissiononbehalfoftheConsumersAssociationofCanada(CAC)(Manitoba)Inc.Specifically,theobjectivesaretocriticallyreviewtheRCEAfilingandprovideexpertadvicethatwillestablishthestrengthsandweaknessesoftheRCEA,andproviderecommendationsaboutwaystheinitiativecouldbeimproved,withaparticularfocusontheapproachandprocesstakentoassessingcumulativeeffects.ThereviewshallbeconsistentwithestablishedprinciplesandmethodologicalguidanceforRCEAinCanadaasendorsedbytheCanadianCouncilofMinistersoftheEnvironment,andwithestablishedRCEAguidanceasreportedinotherpeer-reviewed,publishedexpertworks,bothCanadianandinternational.Thisreviewdoesnotassessthescientificaccuracyordisciplinaryappropriatenessofthefilinginpresentingpastandcurrenteffects,butratherfocusesontheoverallapproachtocumulativeeffectcharacterization,andthecumulativeeffectsassessmentmethodologyaspresentedinthefiling.Similarly,thereviewdoesnotassessthefiling’saccuracyinpresentingcommunityperspectivesandconcerns,butinsteadfocusesontheoverallapproachtakentoconsideringandintegratingcommunityperspectivesandconcernswiththecumulativeeffectsassessmentapproachandmethodology.1.2 QualificationsoftheauthorsDr.JillBlakley4,PhD,MCIP,RPP,hasacademicandprofessionalpracticeexperienceinenvironmentalassessmentandnaturalresourcesmanagement,includingtheassessmentofcumulativeeffectsandhydroelectricdevelopments.SheisanAssociateProfessorintheDepartmentofGeographyandPlanningandcross-appointedtotheSchoolofEnvironmentandSustainabilityattheUniversityofSaskatchewan.ShehasbeenChairoftheRegionalandUrbanPlanningProgramsince2014.From1997-2003Dr.BlakleyactedasaconsultanttoBritishColumbiaHydroonintegratedresourcemanagementforelectricutilitytransmissionrights-of-wayinthecentral,
4 SurnameformerlyGunn,whichappearsonBipoleIII,Keeyask,andNFATcumulativeeffectsassessmentreviews.
| P a g e
7
northern,andwesternregionsofBritishColumbia,includingnon-integratedgenerationsites.Shedocumentedadecade-longinformalprogramtoaddressawidevarietyofenvironmental,social,andeconomicmanagementimperativesviainnovative,site-specificvegetationmanagementstrategies.Dr.BlakleycompletedaPhDspecializinginstrategicandcumulativeeffectsassessmentin2009.HeracademiccontributionsregularlyappearininternationallyregardedperiodicalssuchasImpactAssessmentandProjectAppraisal,theJournalofEnvironmentalAssessmentPolicyandManagement,andtheJournalofEnvironmentalPlanningandManagement.Sinceherappointmentin2009,herbodyofworkonenvironmentalassessmentgrowntoinclude41peer-reviewedscientificpapers,bookchapters,andprofessionalreports,and44conferencepresentations.Intheareaofcumulativeeffectsassessment,shehasco-authorednumerousexpertreports,manywithDr.BramNoble,including:
• theCanadianCouncilofMinistersoftheEnvironment(CCME)guidanceonregional-strategicenvironmentalassessment(CCME2008,2009)whichinformedSection3.5(RegionalImpactAssessment)oftherecentfederalExpertPanelreportBuildingCommonGround:ANewVisionforImpactAssessmentinCanada(Gelinasetal.2017,seeSection3.5RegionalImpactAssessment),andalsoservedasafoundationfortheAlbertagovernment’sinnovativeLand-useFramework;
• aguidetoassessingthemacroenvironmentalimpactsofthepreferredplanandalternativesinManitobaHydro’sNeedsforandAlternativesToo(NFAT)reviewofKeeyaskandConawapaGeneratingStations;
• areportdefiningkeycumulativeeffectsconceptsforCCME’s14jurisdictions(CCME2014);• theCriticalReviewoftheCumulativeEffectsAssessmentUndertakenbyManitobaHydrofor
theBipoleIIIProjectexpertreport(2012);and • theReviewofKHLP’sApproachtotheKeeyaskGenerationProjectCumulativeEffects
Assessmentexpertreport(2013).Since1997,Dr.BlakleyhasprovidedexpertadvicetoarangeoforganizationsincludingtheCanadianEnvironmentalAssessmentAgency;FisheriesandOceansCanada;AlbertaEnvironment;theCanadianInternationalDevelopmentAgency;thePublicInterestLawCenterofManitobaandtheConsumersAssociationofCanada(Manitoba);Pape,SalterandTeilletBarristersandSolicitors;theCanadianInstituteofPlanners;andtheCityofSaskatoon.Dr.AyodeleOlagunju,PhD,PMPisanenvironmentalassessmentprofessionalwiththeGovernmentofAlberta.HeearnedaPhDin2016specializinginenvironmentalassessmentandtheintegrationofassessment,planning,andpolicy-makingonaregionalscale.Hisworkonimprovinggovernancearrangementstofacilitateregionalenvironmentalassessmenthasbeenfeaturedinnumerousinternationalpeer-reviewedjournalsincludingEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentReview,theJournalofEnvironmentalAssessment,PolicyandManagement,andImpactAssessmentandProjectAppraisal.Dr.Olagunjuhasco-authoredseveralenvironmentalassessmenttechnicalreportsincludingtheManitobaHydro’sNeedsforandAlternativesto(NFAT)ReviewoftheKeeyaskandConawapaGeneratingStations:MacroEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentguidance(withDr.Blakley)commissionedbytheConsumersAssociationofCanada(Manitoba)in2014andmorerecently,A
| P a g e
8
ReviewoftheApplicationofCumulativeEffectsAssessmentintheContextofProjectEnvironmentalAssessments:TheJamesBayTerritory(withDr.BramNobleandJackieMartin,MSc)preparedfortheJamesBayAdvisoryCommitteeontheEnvironmentQuebec.1.3ReportformatThereportispresentedinfoursections,includingthisIntroduction.InSection2,anexplanationofthenatureandimportanceofregionalcumulativeeffectsassessmentisprovided,includingadescriptionofitscoreprinciplesandmethodology.InSection3,wedescribeouroverallapproachtothecriticalreview,andthereviewcriteriathatwereused.Section4presentstheresultsofthereviewoftheRCEAfiling.Boththestrengthsandweaknessofthefilingareconsidered.Section4alsocontainsrecommendationstoimprovetheRCEAinitiative,andguideManitobaandManitobaHydrofurthertowardgoodpracticeregionalcumulativeeffectsassessmentofhydroelectricdevelopmentsaffectingtheChurchill,BurntwoodandNelsonRiversystems.2.0REGIONALCUMULATIVEEFFECTSASSESSMENT2.1 Whatisregionalcumulativeeffectsassessment?CumulativeeffectsCumulativeenvironmentaleffectsarecommonlydefinedas“changestotheenvironmentthatarecausedbyanactionincombinationwithotherpast,presentandfutureactions.”5.Somedefinitionsalsoemphasizethecontributionofnaturalprocessestocumulativeenvironmentalchange,suchasthatrecentlyissuedbytheCanadianCouncilofMinistersoftheEnvironment:“achangeintheenvironmentcausedbymultipleinteractionsamonghumanactivitiesandnaturalprocessesthataccumulateacrossspaceandtime”6.Theactionsreferredtointhesedefinitionsareoftenvaried(heterotypic)innature,butalsocanbeidentical(homotypic)actions.Forexample,activitiesassociatedwithforestharvestingsuchasroadbuilding,streamcrossings,andclearingnativevegetationincutblockstogethercandegradewildlifehabitatforfur-bearerssuchasgraywolf7,butrepetitive,episodicdischargesofpulpmilleffluentintoarivercanalsodegradewaterqualityforsalmonandotherfreshwaterbiota8.Inbothcases,theperturbationscanoverwhelmtheabilityofthereceivingenvironmenttoabsorbthechange,causingacumulativeenvironmentaleffect.Cumulativeeffectshavebeendescribedas‘progressivenibbling’,‘deathbyathousandcuts’andthe‘tyrannyofsmalldecisions’9: 5 Hegmannetal1999:pg3 6 CCME2014 7 Houleetal.2009 8 Marmoreketal.1992 9 NobleandGunn2013
| P a g e
9
‘Progressivenibbling’referstotheoften-insidiousprocessoflandconversionand/orenvironmentaldegradationthatoccursslowlyovertimeandtypicallyintheabsenceofaregionalperspectiveondevelopment.‘Deathbyathousandcuts’referstothephenomenonwherebysmall,butrepetitive,insultstothesameenvironmentalcomponentoccuroverandoverandeventually,butoftenunexpectedly,causeits‘death’ortotaldemise.The‘tyrannyofsmalldecisions’,aconceptoriginallyintroducedbyeconomistAlfredKahninthe1960s,helpsexplainhowbothofthesephenomenacanoccursimultaneously:itisasituationinwhichanumberofseparatedecisionscumulatively,andoftenunintentionally,resultinaconditionthatisneitheroptimalnordesirable.
Thus,cumulativeeffectsareofteninsidious:whilemanydevelopmentactivitiesanddecisionscanbeindividuallyinsignificant,togethertheirimpactscanhaveregionalandevenglobalrepercussions.CumulativeeffectsassessmentCumulativeeffectsassessment(CEA)andmanagementhasbeenakeyelementofgoodpracticeimpactassessmentformorethan40yearsincountriessuchastheUnitedStatesandCanada,andaroundtheworld.TheInternationalFinanceCorporation(IFC)oftheWorldBankdescribethisprocessas:
(a)analyzingthepotentialimpactsandrisksofproposeddevelopmentsinthecontextofthepotentialeffectsofotherhumanactivitiesandnatureenvironmentalandsocialexternaldriversonthechosenVEC[valuedenvironmentalcomponent]overtime,and(b)proposingconcretemeasurestoavoid,reduce,ormitigatesuchcumulativeimpactsandriskstotheextentpossible10.
Cumulativeeffectsassessmentandmanagementisarguablybestperformedonaregionalscalebecausethisscaleofassessmentisbroaderbothgeographicallyandtemporallythansingleproject-focusedimpactassessmenttypicallyis,anditisbetterpositionedtocapturetherangeofstressorsthatareaffectingaVECofconcern.WithinCanadianandinternationalenvironmentalimpactassessmentliterature,itiswellestablishedthatregional-scaleCEAisamoreeffectivemeanstoaddresscumulativeeffects11.ItdiffersfromCEAinproject-basedassessmentinanumberofways:
• itadoptsambitious,asopposedtorestrictive,scoping,meaningthattheimpactanalysisgoesbeyondtheevaluationofthesite-specific,directimpactsofasingleprojecttoencompassbroaderregionalunderstandingsofdevelopmentpressureandconsiderationsofthevarioussourcesofcumulativeenvironmentalchange12;
10IFC2013,pg.21 11Fore.g.,see:Roots1986;Daveyetal.2002;Kennett2002;CooperandSheate2004;HorvathandBarnes2004;Dalal-ClaytonandSadler2005
12HarrimanandNoble2008
| P a g e
10
• thegoaloftheassessmentistoevaluatethefullrangeofimpactsonVECscausedbypast,currentandproposedfutureinitiatives,ideallyonamulti-sectoralbasis,anddeterminewhetherecologicalthresholdshavealreadybeencrossed.Ifathresholdhasbeencrossed,anyfutureimpactonaVECmustbeconsideredsignificant.Withthisinformation,itiseasiertodeterminewhichenvironmentalmanagementstrategiesarenecessarytorestore,maintain,orenhanceVECsustainability;
• ideally,itisstrategicinnature.WhenRCEAisapproachedasastrategicexercise,itspurposeisdifferent–itisusedtocomparecompetingdevelopmentscenariosanddetermineapreferreddevelopmentpathforthefuture,includingthedesirednatureandpaceofdevelopment.Theresultscanbeusedtoinformandinfluenceotherregionalplanningandpolicy-makingexercises,andsubsequentprojectapprovalsandconditions;
• itisoftenusedtoestablishlong-term,coordinatedadaptivemanagementandmonitoringprogramstoensurestewardshipandprotectionofkeyresources,aswellasenhancesociallicensetooperateinaresourcedevelopmentregion;and
• itprovidesauniqueforumforconversation,innovation,andrelationshipbuildingamongprojectproponents,governments,NGOs,andthepublictohelpensuretheresiliencyofVECsismaintainedinthefaceofongoingregionaldevelopment.AnopenandcollaborativeapproachtoRCEAisessential.
2.2 Whyisitimportanttoassessregional-scalecumulativeeffects?Theincreasedpaceandintensityofresourcedevelopmentinmanyregionsoftheworld,combinedwithincreasedconcernforenvironmentalprotection,hasbroughtRCEAintofocusinrecentyears.AtthetopofmanyresearchandpolicyagendasacrossCanadaandelsewhereisdevelopingpartnershipsandinnovativemeanstoaddresscumulativeeffectssuchasclimatechange,worseningairquality,freshwatershortages,deforestation,noiseandlightpollution,andwildlifehabitatfragmentation.Somespecificexamplesofregional-scalecumulativeeffectsissuesinclude:
• Incrementallossofprairiewetlandsandpollutionoffreshwatercausedbyagriculturalpracticeswhichaffectsmigratorybirdsandotherwildlifespecies13;
• Shorelinedamageanddamagetothelandscape,flora,fauna,andhistoricalartifactsinmarineareascausedbyrepeatedvisitsbyship-basedtouristsintheAntarcticPeninsulaArea14.TourismrelatedimpactsaffectingwildlifeconservationeffortsarealsoexperiencedinCanadiannationalparks15;
• Sulfurdioxideandnitrousoxidepollutioncreatedbyelectricitygeneration,factories,andvehicleswhichistransformedintoacidrain;leadingtoacidificationofwetlandsandwaterbodiesandlossofspeciesdiversity16;
13GovernmentofCanada2017 14NationalScienceFoundation2000 15Cookeetal.2017 16https://www.epa.gov/acidrain/what-acid-rain
| P a g e
11
• Greenhousegasemissionsleadingtoglaciermeltandrisingsealevelsandlossofpolarbearhabitat17;and
• Accessroadsandfly-infly-outprogramsintroducedinnortherndevelopmentregionsleadingtostrainoncommunityhealthandinfrastructureservices,starkincomedisparitiesamonglocalandmigrantworkers,andincreasesinalcoholanddruguseaswellascrimeandfamilyviolence18.
InAugust2016,theCanadianMinisterofEnvironmentandClimateChangeestablishedanExpertPaneltoinvestigateoptionsforimpactassessmentreforminCanada.ThereportoftheExpertPanel19underscoredtheimportanceofregional-scaleimpactassessmentbyestablishingitasacorecomponentof‘nextgeneration’impactassessmentpracticeandsignalingthefederalgovernment’sintentiontoassessthecollectiveimpactsofdevelopmentonaregionalbasis.ThereportoftheExpertPanelbuildsuponprinciplesandamethodologyforregionalstrategicenvironmentalassessmentestablishedbytheCanadianCouncilofMinistersoftheEnvironmentaboutadecadeprior20.Itrecommendsthatregionalandstrategicimpactassessmentsbeusedtoguideprojectimpactassessments,wherebystrategicandregionalimpactassessmentsproducethepolicyandplanningfoundationsforimprovedandefficientimpactassessments”21.AlthoughformallypromotedbytheCCME,interestinregionalcumulativeeffectsassessmenthasalsogrownorganicallyinthe21stcenturyinCanada.Numerousprovincialandfederalgovernmentdepartments,NGOs,andindustriesinCanadahaveinitiatedorcalledforregionalimpactassessmentsindependentlyoverthepastdecadeorso,basedonitsperceivedvalue-added.Theseinclude:FisheriesandOceansCanada;theSaskatchewanMinistryoftheEnvironment;AlbertaEnvironmentandParks;ParksCanadaAgency;TeckCoal;AboriginalAffairsandNorthernDevelopmentCanada(inpartnershipwiththeenergyindustry,Inuvialuitandotherregionalstakeholders);theCanadianbranchoftheWorldWildlifeFederation;theWildlifeConservationSocietyofCanadaandEcojustice;andConocoPhillips22,amongothers.Thegoalsandobjectivesoftheseinitiativesarevariable,reflectingdifferentenvironmental,social,andpoliticalcontextsandvaluesystems.Aswell,thenatureofeachassessmentisdifferent,withsomeassessmentsbeingstrategicinnatureandothersnot23.Takingastrategicapproachtoregionalcumulativeeffectsassessmentmeansthattheassessmentisproactiveandobjectives-led,anddesignedtoinfluencedevelopmentpolicies,plans,orprogramsat
17 https://www.carbonbrief.org/polar-bears-and-climate-change-what-does-the-science-say 18Leungetal.2016 19Gelinasetal2017 20CCME2009 21Gelinasetal.2017,pg.3,6 22Seeforexample:GSHRES2007;BSStRPA2009;GunnandNoble2009;Kirchhoffetal2010,2011;Johnsonetal.2011;FidlerandNoble2013;NobleandGunn2013;ChetkiewiczandLintner2014
23See:HarrimanandNoble2008
| P a g e
12
thehighestlevelandearliestopportunitypossible.Thefocusisonarticulatingdesiredgoals,objectives,andalternativesforfuturedevelopment.Itinvolvesassessingtheimpactsofeitherasingleormultipledevelopmentsectors,andineithercase,setsthecontextforsubsequentprojectdevelopment.Single-sector,strategicapproachestoregionalcumulativeeffectsassessment:
…evaluatethepotentialeffectsofproposedsector-basedinitiativesandalternativesincombinationwithimpactsfromprevious,existing,andfutureactivitiesandinitiativesofasimilartypeinordertoidentifyapreferredsector-basedenvironmentaldevelopmentstrategy.The‘sector’generallyreferstoplansandinitiativesofaparticularindustrysuchasforestry,mining,orenergy24.
AccordingtotheCCME25,thepotentialsubstantivebenefitsofastrategicapproachtoregionalcumulativeeffectsassessmentinclude:
• integratingsustainabilityconsiderationsinregionalpolicies,plans,programsanddevelopmentinitiatives;
• establishingacommon,long-termframeworkforregionaldecisionmaking;• analyzingimpactsneitherindividuallyorcollectivelysubjecttoprojectimpactassessment;• managingimpactsattheappropriategeographicscale;and• contributingtodiscussionsofsustainableregionaldevelopment.
TheCCMEnotespotentialproceduralbenefitsaswell:
• theopportunitytoimproveregionaldatabasesandcreatemechanismsforinformationsharing;
• facilitatingstateoftheartenvironmentalmonitoringandreporting;• savingtimeandresourcesbystrategicallyavoidingimpacts(reducingtheamountof
mitigationnecessaryinprojectimpactassessment);• settingperformancestandardsforsubsequentproject-basedimpactassessment;and• providingindicationofpublicinterestinregionalenvironmentalissues.
TheimportanceofundertakingastrategicregionalcumulativeeffectsassessmentexerciseinnorthernManitobaatthistimecannotbeunderstated.Followingnearlysixdecadesofhydroelectricplanninganddevelopment(plansfortheGrandRapidsHydroProjectbeganinearnestasearlyas195726anditbecameoperationalin1964),significantcumulativechangetotheenvironment,includingsocialandculturalimpactstoIndigenousandnon-Indigenouscommunitiesintheregion,isundeniable.ThisisprominentlynotedintheKeeyaskenvironmentalimpactstatement27,whichclearlyacknowledgesthattheregionalenvironmenthasalreadybeensubstantiallyalteredbypast 24See:HarrimanandNoble2008 25CCME2009 26Waldram1984 27NobleandGunn2013
| P a g e
13
development:
TheterrestrialenvironmentintheareatobeaffectedbytheProjecthasbeensubstantiallyalteredbypasthydroelectricdevelopments,lineardevelopments(includingtransmissionlines,highways,andraillines),forestryandminingexploration,andotheragentsofchange,andcontinuestoexperiencethoseeffectstoday”(Ch7,p.7-23).Thesocio-economicenvironmentintheareatobeaffectedbytheProjecthasbeensubstantiallychangedbypasthydroelectricdevelopments,lineardevelopments(includingtransmissionlines,highways,andraillines),forestryandminingexploration,andotheragentsofchange,andcontinuestoexperiencethoseeffectstoday”(Ch7,p.7-37).TheaquaticenvironmentoftheNelsonRiverwhere[newprojectsmay]beconstructedhasbeensubstantiallyalteredbyhydroelectricdevelopments,inparticulartheChurchillRiverDiversion(CRD)andLakeWinnipegRegulation(LWR),andtheconstructionoftheKettleGS.Effectsof[newprojects]willbesuper-imposedonthisdisruptedenvironment”(Ch6,p.6-54).Fromthelate1950stothepresent,morethan35majorgeneration,conversionandtransmissionprojectshavebeenundertakenbyManitobaHydroinnortheasternManitobaaffectingthetraditionalterritoriesof[Indigenous]communitiesandmembers”(Ch.6,p6-12).
Rivershavebeendiverted,wildlifekilled,reservelandflooded,communitiesrelocated,etc.,withmanykeydecisionsinthefirsttwodecadesofdevelopment(1960-1977)beingrushedandIndigenouscommunitiesfacedwithdecisionstotallyunlikeanythingwithwhichtheyhadeverbeenconfronted28.In1979,aCommissionofInquiryIntoManitobaHydro(the‘TritschlerReport’)foundthatwithrespecttoimpactassessmentandcompensation,by1972ManitobaandManitobaHydrodidnothaveacompensationscheme,thatthevariousgovernmentdepartmentsfailedtocooperateintheareasofcompensationandmitigation,andthattheyadoptedaconfrontational,hostilestancetowardtheaffectedIndigenouscommunities29.In1977,theNorthernFloodAgreement(NFA)wassignedbyManitoba,ManitobaHydro,andthefederalgovernment,andratifiedbyFirstNationsleaders30toaddressmitigationandmanagementdeficiencies.Between1978and1992,anumberofmajoreffortsweremadetoimplementtheagreement,includinglandusestudies,ecologicalmonitoringprograms,andcommunityinfrastructureupgrades.However,therewasgeneraldiscontentwiththewayimplementationandcompensationwashandled,leadingtoManitoba
28Waldram1984 29Waldram1984 30InformationontheNorthernFloodAgreementinthisparagraphisdrawnfromKnowHistory(2016),commissionedbytheManitobaCleanEnvironmentCommission.
| P a g e
14
Hydrosigningmajorimplementationsettlementagreementsbetween1992and1997.Additional,supplementalagreementswithNFAcommunitiesweresignedbetween2004and2015.AtissuewereongoingconcernssuchasfloodingoflandanddamagetoshorelinesbytheChurchillRiverDiversionandLakeWinnipegRegulationProjects,compensationforadversehigh-watereventsthatoccurredbetween1977and2016;andprovisionofalternativeemploymentopportunities. Atpresent,thereisauniqueandunprecedentedwindowofopportunityforpolicychangeregardinghydroelectricandotherdevelopmentinnorthernManitoba,beforeadditionaldevelopmentdecisionsaretakenthataffecttheregion.TheManitobaCEChasrecommendedthataRCEAbeundertakenpriortothelicensingofanyadditionalprojectsintheNelsonRiversub-watershedaftertheBipoleIIIproject.Ifcarefullydesigned,theRCEAinitiativecanhelpfocusattentionontheissuestogetthemonthepolicyagenda,createorstrengthencoalitionsthatsustainattentionaroundanissue,andincreasetheknowledgethatpolicy-makershaveaboutissuesimportanttonorthernresidentstodayandoverthepasthalfcentury.MostimportantlytheRCEAcanserveasameanstoproactivelyaddressregionalcumulativeeffectsissues,aspromotedbytheCCME,aswellasinformandstrengthenrelatedpolicyinitiativessuchastheManitobaCleanEnergyStrategy,theGrowingOurWatershedsinitiative,andpotentially,apubliclyendorsedvisionfordevelopmentinthenorth.2.3 Whatarethekeyelementsofregionalcumulativeeffectsassessment?WithrespecttogoodpracticeRCEA,guidingprinciples,amethodologicalframeworkthatdetailsimportantstagesintheprocess,andspecificguidanceonassessingcumulativeeffectsareallpublicallyavailable.Eachoftheseissummarizedbelow.In2009,theCanadianCouncilofMinistersoftheEnvironmentissuedanumberofcoreandmethodologicalprinciplesforregionalstrategicenvironmentalassessment(Table1)31–whichisessentiallyRCEAsetwithinastrategicassessmentcontext32.Thecoreprinciplesarethatitis:strategic;futures-oriented;commencesearlyon;cumulativeeffectsfocused;multi-tiered;multi-scaled;participatory;opportunistic;andadaptive.Intermsofmethodologicalapproach,itshouldbe:integrated;focusedonalternatives;regionalVEC-based;interdisciplinary;andstructuredandsystematic.Someoftheseelementsarethesameastheywouldinbeinanyimpactassessment(e.g.participatory,earlycommencement,adaptive),andsomearespecifictoaregionalassessmentcontext(e.g.integrated,regionalVEC-based,multi-tiered,multi-scaled). 31See:CCME2009,pg.14,15 32ItisregionalstrategicenvironmentalassessmentthatGunnandNoblecalledforin2012attheBipoleIIIhearing,andtheCECcalledforin2004attheWuskwatimhearing.
| P a g e
15
Table1.CoreandmethodologicalprinciplesofregionalstrategicenvironmentalassessmentCorePrinciplesStrategic Goalsandobjectives-led.Identifiesstrategicinitiatives,evaluatesalternatives,and
formulatesastrategyformovingforwardtowardadesiredfuturestate.Futures-oriented FocusesonidentifyingpossiblefuturesandthemeanstoshaperegionaloutcomesEarlycommencement Isundertakenattheearliestpossiblestagesofdecisionmaking,toinformthe
developmentofstrategicinitiatives,policies,plans,orprogramsCumulativeeffectsfocused Identifiedcumulativeeffectsastherealeffectsofconcernoperatingattheregional
scaleMulti-tiered Theassessmentinforms,andisinformedby,broaderregionalandmulti-regional
environmentalmanagementandalsodownstreamprojectassessmentanddecisionmaking
Multi-scaled Primaryissuesofcumulativeeffectscanberevisited,whereneeded,notonlyatdifferenttiersbutalsoatdifferentspatialscales.Analysisofimpactsismulti-scaled
Participatory Ensuresearlyandongoinginvolvementofrelevantstakeholdersandinterestedpartiesinassessment(scoping,impactevaluation,significancedetermination),monitoring,andmanagement
Opportunistic Providesanopportunitytoexamineregionaldevelopmentthroughbroaderstakeholderdebate,andidentifiestheneedtocreateormodifyinstitutionalarrangementsforimprovedenvironmentalmanagement
Adaptive Treatsstrategies,andpolicies,plans,andprogramsas‘experiments’,expectingtomodifyandadaptthemasnewknowledgeisgainedthroughimplementation,monitoring,andfeedback
MethodologicalPrinciplesIntegrated Coreelementsoftheprocessshouldbetailor-madeandintegratedwiththedecision
makingsysteminplace.Shouldbeanintegralpartof,andprovideoverallguidanceto,thedevelopmentofregionalstrategiesandinitiatives.Shouldintegratemultiplescientificperspectivesanddisciplines
Focusedonalternatives Emphasizesthecreationandevaluationofalternatives,oftenintheformofalternativedevelopmentscenariosforaregion.Bycomparingmultiple,alternativedevelopmentscenarios,decisionmakersareabletoobtainavividpictureofthelikelyconsequencesofdifferentcoursesofaction
RegionalVEC-based Cumulativeeffectsprocessesareoftenlinkedwithhighlycomplexglobalandregionalenvironmentalmanagementissuessuchasclimatechangeorbiodiversity.Thus,theconceptofavaluedecosystemcomponentmustberelevanttoaregionalscaleofanalysis,andberepresentedbybroadindicatorsofecosystemhealthandregionalenvironmentalchange
Interdisciplinary Involvesmultiplelevelsofinterest,rangingfrompoliticaldecisionmakerstodisciplinaryspecialists,andvarioussectorsofthepublicincludingindustry.Emphasizesainter-disciplinary(asopposedtosimplymulti-disciplinary)approach;onethatenablesallpartiestoidentifyandaddresscommonissuesandtoappreciatewhere,andinwhatform,theirinformationisusefultoothersandatdifferenttiersofdecisionmaking
Structuredandsystematic Themethodologicalframeworkshouldbeflexibletotheparticularpolicyandplanningcontext,butitremainsimportantthatsystematicandstructuredmethodologicalframeworksareemployedatthestrategiclevel,astheyareattheprojectlevel
Thebasicmethodology,orprocess,toconductaregionalstrategicenvironmentalassessmentisshowninFigure1,below.Theprocessisstructuredandsystematicyetdesignedtobeusedflexibly
| P a g e
16
inavarietyofdevelopmentanddecision-makingcontexts.Therearethreephases33:(i) pre-assessmentphase(steps1-3)inwhichgoalsfortheexerciseareestablished,thespatial
andtemporalboundariesoftheassessmentaredetermined,VECsofinterestareselected,andtheregionalbaselineisdescribedasareregionalstressorsandchangetrends.Opportunitiestoinfluencefuturepolicies,plans,andprojectdecisionsareidentified,alongwithkeypartnersandcontributorstotheassessment;
(i) assessmentphase(steps4-6)whichisusedtoidentifystrategicoptionsoralternativesfor
theregionandtheirpotentialeffects,opportunities,andrisks.EmphasisisplacedonassessingcumulativeimpactstoVECs,andusingthisinformationtoidentifyapreferreddevelopmentpathfortheregion;and
(ii) post-assessmentphase(steps7-9)whichfocusesonimplementationincludingadaptive
managementandmonitoring.Follow-upandreviewisconductedperiodicallyaftertheassessmentsothatadjustmentstotheimpactanalysisand/ormanagementplancanbemadeasnewknowledgeemergesorconditionschange.
Figure1.BasicmethodologicalprocessforregionalstrategicenvironmentalassessmentAtthecoreofanyregional-scaleimpactassessmentprocessisCEA(step5intheframeworkabove).ThereisplentyofguidanceavailableforCEA34,allofwhichidentifiesseveralnecessarycomponents
33StepsaredescribedinmoredetailinNobleandGunn,Ch5,Hannatext;andGunnandNoble,Ch5,inMorrison-Saunders,etal.text.
34Seefore.g.,CEQ1997;Ross1998;EuropeanCommission1999;Hegmannetal.1999;DuinkerandGreig2006;INAC2007;CanterandRoss2010;Noble2010;IFC2013;Duinkeretal.2013;CEAA
| P a g e
17
inundertakingCEA.ThecorecomponentsofCEAareessentiallythesamewhetherinaregional,strategic,orprojectassessmentcontext.IntheabsenceofanyoneofthesecomponentsaCEAisincomplete.Thecomponentsare:
a) Cumulativeeffectsscoping,whichservestoestablishwhichprojectsandactions—past,present,andfuture—willbeincludedwhenevaluatingcumulativeprocessesofchange.GoodCEAadoptsecosystemhealthandfunctioningasacoredeterminantofVECselection;thusambitiousscopingisimportant.EffectiveCEAmustbespatiallyandtemporallyboundbasedonthedistributionoftheVECsaffectedbyboththeprojectsinquestionandtheeffectsofotherprojectsanddisturbances.
b) Retrospectiveanalysis,focusedondeterminingbaselineconditions,howconditionshave
changedovertime,whetherthatchangeissignificanttothesustainabilityoftheVECsofconcern(i.e.thresholddetermination,settingacceptablelimits),andwhetherandhowthatchangeisattributedorconnectedtopastandpresentdevelopmentactivities.AnattemptismadetoidentifyrelationshipsbetweenindicatorsofchangeinVECconditions(e.g.cariboupopulation;waterqualityindices)andmeasuresofhumanornaturaldisturbancesoastodeterminetrendsandassociationsthatcanbeusedtopredictVECconditionsorresponsestofuturecumulativechange.
c) Prospectiveanalysis,centeredonquantitativemodelingorscenario-basedapproaches,whichservestoassesspotentialimpactsorresponsestodisturbancesinthefuture,includingdisturbancesdirectlyattributabletotheprojectsinquestionandtootherpresentandfutureprojectsandactionswithintheregionalenvironment.Modelsaredeveloped(spatial,linear,quantitative,qualitative),basedonretrospectiveanalysisandinformationgainedfromnewdataorlessonsfromelsewhere,topredicthowVECindicators(e.g.,cariboupopulation;waterqualityindex)mayrespondtoadditionalstressinthefuture–stresscausedbytheprojectandbyotherprojectsandactionsintheregionalenvironment(e.g.,landscapefragmentation;rivercrossings).Inothercases,wheredataarenotavailable,lessonsfromtheoutcomesofsimilarprojectsandexpertjudgmentareusedtoexplorepossiblefutureconditions.
d) Management,designedtoidentifyappropriatemitigationandmonitoringactionsforthose
VECssubjecttocumulativeeffects.UnderstandinghowmuchmorechangeinanaffectedVECistolerable,oracceptable,iskeytosignificancedeterminationorsustainabilitytest,asthecasemaybeinaregionalassessment,andthisrequiresknowledgeofotherdevelopmentactionsintheregion–past,present,andfuture.InthosecaseswhereaVECisalreadyunhealthyand/orregionalconditionsarealreadyunsustainable,themanagementeffortsmustfocusonrectifyingorrestoringconditions,anddeliveringnetpositivecontributionstoregionalsustainability.
2014
| P a g e
18
3.0APPROACHTOREVIEWANDREVIEWCRITERIAConsistentwiththescopeoftheworkoutlinedinSection1,weundertookacriticalreviewoftheManitobaandManitobaHydroRCEAforhydroelectricdevelopmentsontheChurchill,BurntwoodandNelsonRiversystems.Methodologically,thisinvolvedaliteraturereview(Section2.0)toestablishabasisforthereview,andsubsequentanalysisofthefilingtodeterminecorestrengthsandweaknesses,andidentifyanyareasforrecommendedimprovements.AlthoughtheCEC’sBipoleIIIrecommendationdoesnotcallspecificallyforastrategicregionalcumulativeeffectsassessmentinnorthernManitoba,andtheTermsofReferencefortheRCEAreflectthis,theCECdidpreviouslyrecommendastrategicapproachintheWuskwatimhearing.NobleandGunnalsorecommendedastrategicapproachtoregionalcumulativeeffectsassessmentintheirreviewoftheBipoleIIIfiling.GiventhattheConsumers’AssociationofCanada(Manitobachapter)haveaskedtolearnmoreaboutastrategicapproachtoregionalcumulativeeffectsassessmentandhowtheManitobaandManitobaHydroRCEAcompares,ourselectedreviewcriteriainclude:theCCME’scoreandmethodologicalprinciplesforregionalstrategicenvironmentalassessment,NobleandGunn’sstep-wiseprocesstoundertakeregionalstrategicenvironmentalassessment,andthefourcomponentsofastandardmethodologyforCEA,asdescribedabove.ThesearesummarizedinTable2.Table2.ReviewcriteriafortheManitobaandManitobaHydroRCEAPartA.CoreandmethodologicalprinciplesforregionalstrategicenvironmentalassessmentCoreStrategic Istheassessmentgoalsandobjectives-led?Arestrategicalternativestothe
developmentstatusquoidentified?Futures-oriented Isapreferredfuturedevelopmentstrategyidentifiedfortheregion?Earlycommencement Istheexerciseundertakenearlyenoughtoinformstrategicdecisionsaboutthe
futureoftheregion?Cumulativeeffectsfocused Areregional-scalecumulativeeffectsacentralconcern?Multi-tiered Cantheassessmentresultsprovidecontextfor‘upstream’(policy)and
downstream’(project)decision-making,andvice-versa?Multi-scaled Aredifferentspatialscalesusedtobetterunderstandregionalcumulative
effects?Participatory Arestakeholdersandkeyinformantsinvolvedinscoping,assessment,
monitoring,andmanagementactivities?Opportunistic Doestheexerciseinformbroaderstakeholderdebateandopportunitiesto
modifyinstitutionalarrangementsforimprovedenvironmentalmanagement?Adaptive Istheassessmentflexibleenoughtobemodifiedasnewknowledgeisgained
throughimplementation,monitoring,andfeedback?MethodologicalIntegrated Doestheassessmentdrawinformationfromexistingregionalstudies,andcan
itaddvaluetootherregionalplanningormanagementexercises?Focusedonalternatives Aremultiplealternativedevelopmentscenariosassessedsuchthatthelikely
consequencesofdifferentcoursesofactionareilluminated?RegionalVEC-based Areselectedvaluedcomponentsrelevanttoaregionalscaleofanalysis,and
representedbybroadindicatorsofecosystemhealthandregional
| P a g e
19
environmentalchange?Interdisciplinary Isacross-sectionofdisciplinesandinterestsengaged,includinggovernment,
non-government,scientific,public,andindustryrepresentatives?Aretheseperspectivesdevelopedintheassessmentinaninter-disciplinaryfashion?
Structuredandsystematic Isastructuredandsystematicmethodologicalenvironmentalassessmentframeworkemployed?
PartB.Step-wisemethodologicalprocessforregionalstrategicenvironmentalassessmentPre-assessmentphase• developreferenceframework• scopetheregionalbaseline• identifyregionalstressorsand
trends
Assessmentphase• identifystrategicalternativesfor
theregion• assessthecumulativeeffectsof
eachalternative• identifyapreferredstrategic
alternative
Post-assessmentphase• identifymitigationneedsand
managementactions• developafollow-upand
monitoringprogram• implementthestrategy,monitor
andevaluate• follow-upandreview
PartC.Cumulativeeffectsassessmentcomponents35Cumulativeeffectsscoping i) TheCEAconsidersalltypesofactivitiesandstresses(human-induced
andnaturaldisturbances)thatmayinteractwithVECsofconcernii) TheCEAadoptsparticipatory,ecologically-basedscopingiii) AnexplicitrationaleisprovidedforCEAVECselectioniv) SpatialboundariesreflectthenaturaldistributionpatternsofVECs
selectedfortheCEAv) TheCEAadequatelycapturespastdevelopmentandothercertainand
reasonablyforeseeablefutureprojectsandactivitiesRetrospectiveanalysis i) Thebaselineanalysisdelineatespastandpresentcumulativeeffects
ii) ThebaselineanalysisestablishestrendsinVECconditionsandknownorsuspectedrelationshipsbetweenchangesinVECconditionsandthedriversofchange
iii) Thresholds(e.g.managementtargets,benchmarks,orecologicallimits)arespecifiedagainstwhichcumulativechangeandthesignificanceofeffectscanbeassessed
Prospectiveanalysis i) Thetimescaleofcumulativeeffectspredictionsissufficienttocapturethescopeofimpactsassociatedwiththelifecycleofprojectsinquestion
ii) Thereissufficientanalysis/evidencetosupportconclusionsaboutpotentialcumulativeeffects
iii) Thetoolsandtechniquesusedarecapableofcapturingcumulativeeffectspathwaysandtheuncertaintiesoffuturedevelopments
iv) TrendsandlinkagesareestablishedbetweenVECconditionsanddisturbancesinthebaselineanalysisandusedtoinformpredictionsaboutcumulativeimpactsinthefuture
v) CumulativeeffectsanalysisiscentredonthetotaleffectsonVECsintheregionalenvironment,andabilitytowithstandfurtherstress
Management i) Isthesignificanceofcumulativeeffectsmeasuredagainstapastreferenceconditionandnotsimplythecurrent,cumulativeordisturbedconditionintheregion?
ii) Isthesignificanceofcumulativeeffectsadequatelydescribedand
35SimilarcomponentsandreviewquestionswereutilizedinboththeBipoleIIIandKeeyaskCEAreviews.
| P a g e
20
justified(e.g.basedonregulatorythresholds,environmentalpolicies,expertevaluation,publicconcerns,etc.)andbasedonVECsustainability,definedbyadesiredorhealthyconditionorthreshold?
iii) Aretheincrementalimpactsoftheprojectsinquestionnot‘tradedoff’againstthesignificanceofallotherdisturbancesofactivitiesintheregion(i.e.minimizedormasked)?
iv) Aremitigationmeasuresidentifiedthathelpoffsetsignificantcumulativeenvironmentaleffects,andifso,isconsiderationisgiventomulti-stakeholdercollaborationtodevelopjointmanagementmeasures?
v) Isadaptivemanagementidentifiedforsignificantcumulativeeffectscontingentuponfuturedevelopmentsandimpactinteractions?
ThereviewcriteriaincorporatethebestavailablenationalguidanceforregionalstrategicenvironmentalassessmentthatwasavailableatthetimethattheRCEAwasperformed,includingprinciplesandstandardsforCEAthatarewellestablishedinthescientificliteratureandprofessionalguidancedocuments.ThereviewcriteriaforCEAarederivedfromanumberofsources,includingtheCumulativeEffectsAssessmentPractitioner’sGuide,publicallyavailablebooksandtechnicalguidanceongoodpracticesinCEAinCanada36,thetwoleadinginternationalscientificjournalsonenvironmentalassessment(EnvironmentalImpactAssessmentReviewandImpactAssessmentandProjectAppraisal),andselectguidancefromotherjurisdictions(e.g.BritishColumbia,Alberta)37.WealsoreferredtopreviousandmorerecentreviewsofCEApracticeinstrategicandprojectcontextsandthelessonsemerging38.TheinformationsourcesusedtoinformourreviewcriteriaareavailableinthepublicdomainthroughtheInternet,governmentandUniversitylibrariesandwouldhavebeenaccessibletoManitobaandManitobaHydro.Inundertakingourreview,weconsultedtherelevantchaptersandsupportingvolumesoftheRCEA(Table3).Whilewereviewedalmosttheentirefilingincludingthetermsofreferenceandtheintegratedsummaryreport,wereportselectivelyonthosesectionsmostrelevanttotheassessmentandcharacterizationofcumulativeeffects,andourreviewcriteria(i.e.relevantsubsectionsofPhaseIIPartsI,III,IV,V,andVI,theTermsofReferencefortheRCEA,andtheIntegratedSummaryReport).WedidnotreviewtechnicalAppendices.Inourreview,werelyprimarilyontheinformationprovidedinPhaseIIoftheRCEA,asthePhaseIreportissuedbyManitobaandManitobaHydrowasconsideredpreliminaryandincomplete.Table3.RCEAmaterialsreviewedTermsofReference
Phase1PartI.IntroductionandApproachPartII.HistoryofHydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionofInterestPartIII.People
36Seeforexample:BeanlandsandDuinker1983;Hegmannetal.1999;Noble2010;CEAA2014 37Seeforexample:AlbertaEnvironmentn.d.;ForestPracticesBoard2011 38Seeforexample:Baxteretal.2001;CanterandRoss2010;GunnandNoble2011
| P a g e
21
PartIV.PhysicalEnvironmentPartV.WaterandLandPhase2PartI.IntroductionandApproachPartII.HistoryofHydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionofInterestPartIII.People
• 3.1Introduction(all)• 3.2StudyScope,ApproachandMethodology(all)• 3.3RegionalProfile(all—Introduction,KeyHistoricalEventsaswellasPopulation,EconomicandOther
Socio-EconomicIndicatorTrendsintheRCEARegionofInterest)• 3.4SummaryofHydroelectricEffectsonPeople,andKeyMitigation,RemediationandCompensation
MeasuresintheRegionofInterest(all)• 3.5SummaryofCommunityInformation(Overview,StructureoftheChapter,andContextfortheChapter)
PartIV.PhysicalEnvironment• 4.1IntroductionandBackground(all)• 4.2EnvironmentalSetting(all-ClimateandGeophysicalLandscape)• 4.3WaterRegime(Introduction,ApproachandMethodsandtheTwelveHydraulicZonesInfluencedbyLake
WinnipegRegulationandChurchillRiverDiversion)• 4.4ErosionandSedimentation(all—IntroductionandDescriptionofErosionandSedimentationProcesses
intheTwelveHydraulicZones)PartV.Water
• 5.1IntroductionandBackground(all)• 5.2WaterQuality(Introduction,allsectionsonCumulativeEffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentonWater
Quality,SummaryofEffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionofInterestonWaterQuality)• 5.3FishCommunity(Introduction,allsectionsonCumulativeEffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentonthe
FishCommunity,SummaryofEffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionofInterestonFishCommunity)
• 5.4LakeSturgeon(Introduction,allsectionsonCumulativeEffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentonLakeSturgeon,SummaryofEffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionofInterestonLakeSturgeon)
• 5.5MercuryinFish(Introduction,allsectionsonCumulativeEffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentonFishMercury,SummaryofEffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionofInterestonFishMercuryConcentrations)
• 5.6FishQuality(Introduction,allsectionsonCumulativeEffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentonFishQuality,SummaryofEffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionofInterestonFishQuality)
• 5.7Seals(Introduction,allsectionsonCumulativeEffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentonSeals,SummaryofEffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionofInterestonSeals)
• 5.8Beluga(Introduction,allsectionsonCumulativeEffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentonBeluga,SummaryofEffectsofHydroelectricDevelopment)
PartVI.Land• 6.1IntroductionandBackground(all)• 6.2Intactness(Introduction,SummaryofEffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionofIntereston
Intactness)• 6.3TerrestrialHabitat(Introduction,SummaryofEffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionof
InterestonTerrestrialHabitat)• 6.4Waterfowl(Introduction,EffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionofInterestonWaterfowl)• 6.5ColonialWaterbirds(Introduction,EffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionofIntereston
ColonialWaterbirds)• 6.6AquaticFurbearers(Introduction,EffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionofIntereston
AquaticFurbearers)• 6.7Barren-groundCaribou(Introduction,CumulativeEffectsofHydroDevelopment,Effectsof
| P a g e
22
HydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionofInterestonBarren-groundCaribou)• 6.8CoastalCaribou(Introduction,CumulativeEffectsofHydroDevelopment,EffectsofHydroelectric
DevelopmentintheRegionofInterestonCoastalCaribou)• 6.9BorealWoodlandCaribou(Introduction,CumulativeEffectsofHydroDevelopmentonBorealWoodland
Caribou,EffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionofInterestonBorealWoodlandCaribou)• 6.10Moose(Introduction,EffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionofInterestonMoose)• 6.11PolarBear(Introduction,EffectsofHydroelectricDevelopmentintheRegionofInterestonPolar
Bears)RegionalCumulativeEffectsAssessmentforHydroelectricDevelopmentsontheChurchill,BurntwoodandNelsonRiverSystems:IntegratedSummaryReport
4.0SYNTHESISOFKEYFINDINGSANDOBSERVATIONSTheTermsofReferencefortheManitobaandManitobaHydroRCEAdidnotexplicitlycallforastrategicassessment,thustheRCEAisnotastrategicinnature.WhileitwouldnotbeappropriatetocriticizethelackofstrategicelementsintheRCEAgiventheTermsofReference,westronglysuggestthatunlesstheRCEAisrevisitedasastrategicexercisemuchofthepotentialvalue-addedoftheRCEAwillbelosttothecitizensofManitoba.WhiletheRCEAdoesofferastrongretrospectiveanalysisofhistoricalimpactstoselectlandandwaterRegionalStudyComponents(RSCs)39,itcouldoffersomuchmore:notintermsofpagesadded,butintermsofperspectiveadded.WeelaboratefurtheronthisinSec.4.3.2.Overall,weconcludethattheManitobaandManitobaHydroRCEAfallsshortofgoodpracticeCEA.GoodpracticeCEA,whetherinaproject-basedorregionalcontext,involvesfourbasicstages:scoping,retrospectiveanalysis,prospectiveanalysis,andmanagement.Withrespecttoscoping,manyexpectedelementsofgoodpracticearepresentforallpartsofthefiling(People,PhysicalEnvironment,LandandWater),includingadaptingthegeographicscaleofanalysistosuitthenatureofeachRSC.RSCsselectedforretrospectiveanalysesalsoseemappropriatelyscopedgiventhecontextofassessingtheimpactsofahydropowercomplex.However,itisimpossibletoconcludewhethertheRSClistiscompleteandappropriateuntilregionalstakeholderspublicallyvetit.AlthoughwedidobservethatmanyexpectedelementsofgoodpracticeretrospectiveanalysiswerepresentfortheLandandWaterPartsofthefiling(lesssoforthePhysicalEnvironmentandPeoplePartsofthefiling),attentiontoprospectiveanalysiswasabsentthroughoutallPartsofthefiling.Impactmanagementwasaddressedonlytotheextentthatanumberofexistingregionalmonitoringprogramswerementioned.Withoutprospectiveanalysistohelpassessandpredictthepossibleenvironmentalchangesthatcouldoccurgivenfuturedevelopment,weconcludethattheprimaryvalueoftheRCEAisasaregionalbaselinestudy.Further,publicengagementthrougheverystageof
39 Regional study components are defined in the report as “Topics that have been selected to focus the
assessment, represent the overall effects of hydroelectric developments within the Region of Interest and reflect key ecological and social concerns, or are of key importance to the people living in the area” (Phase 2, Part1, p. XXV).
| P a g e
23
anyenvironmentalassessmentisstandardofpracticeacceptedinCanadaandinternationally,andhasbeensincethe1970s:regardless,theRCEAdidnotinvolveanypublicengagementinscoping,inperformingtheretrospectiveanalysis,orindiscussingthesignificanceofidentifiedregionalimpacts.Belowweprovideanoverviewofourfindingsandconclusions.OurdetailedreviewoftheRCEAcanbefoundintheAppendix,andincludesreferencetospecificsectionsoftheRCEAaswellaskeyevidencetosupportourfindings.4.1Whatwasdonereasonablywell?
• TheRCEAaddressesbothenvironmentalandsocio-economiceffects.PartIIIPeopleprovidesaverydetailedhistoricalaccountofthesocio-economiceffectsofhydrodevelopmentintheROI,whilePartIVPhysicalEnvironmentgivesanelaboratecharacterizationofthephysicalenvironmentalimpactsonthehydrauliczonesidentified—bothsectionsareusedtosupportLandandWaterwhicharethestrongestPartsofPhaseIIintermsofretrospectiveanalysis.
• TheRCEAconsistentlyreportschangesandtrendsovertimefortheRSCsexaminedinPartIIIPeople,PartIVPhysicalEnvironment,PartVWater,andPartVILand,providingbothquantitativeandqualitativedescriptions.However,thiseffortisoftensignificantlyconfoundedbydatalimitationsincludinglackofpre-developmentdata,lackofdatainthedevelopmentperiod,anddatathatareincongruentandnotabletobecompared.
• TheRCEAconsistentlyattemptstosummarizethecumulativeimpacttoeachRSCfromthe
pre-developmentperiodthroughtotheyear2013andassesstheoverallhealthoftheselectedRSCswithintheregionalecosystem,whileclearlyidentifyinginformationsourcesandacknowledgingdatalimitations.
• TheRCEAconsistentlyprovidesahigh-leveloverviewofpredominantpathwaysofeffectsin
theformofnetworkdiagramsthatillustratedrivers,pathways,andeffectsforeachselectedRSCforPhysicalEnvironment,Land,andWater(anacceptedCEAmethod).OthersectorsofdevelopmentcontributingstresstoeachRSCintheregionarealsoidentifiedinthenetworkanalysis.
• TheRCEAcomparespre-developmentconditionstoconditionsduringthedevelopment
periodinmanyinstanceswheredataisavailable,forallParts:People,PhysicalEnvironment,LandandWater.
• TheRCEAcompareson-site/on-systemconditionswithoff-site/off-systemconditionsinmany
instanceswheredataisavailableforPartVWaterandPartVILand.
• ThespatialscopeofanalysisisadjustedtosuiteachRSC.Typically,asub-regional(sometimeslocationspecific)approachtoassessingeffectsisutilized(e.g.thehydrauliczonesidentifiedinPartIVPhysicalEnvironment),andattimestheboundaryofanalysisisextendedbeyond
| P a g e
24
theROItocapturetheextentofmigratoryhabitat,forexample.
• TheRCEAconsistentlyusesindicators,metrics,andbenchmarkstoassessimpactstoPartVWaterandPartVILandRSCs.However,thisisnotevidentinPartIIIPeopleorPartIVPhysicalEnvironment.
• TheRCEAidentifiesdriverandresponseindicatorstofacilitateaclearerpictureoftheoverall
healthofeachRSCinPartIVPhysicalEnvironment,PartVWaterandPartVILand.Inourviewthisisauseful,innovativepractice.
4.2Whereareimprovementsneeded?
• ScopingtheRCEAasaretrospectiveexerciseratherthanastrategicexerciserepresentsamissedopportunityinlightoftheCEC’spaststatementsidentifyingtheneedforastrategicassessmentofcumulativeeffectsintheregion.
• ThescopeofprojectsintheRCEARegionofInterest(ROI)includestheKeeyaskgenerationproject.However,analysisofimpactsintheRCEAisstrictlyconfinedtoanhistoricalanalysisofpastimpactsbasedonrecordsandmonitoringdatapublishedpreviousto2013.WefailtoseehowthefutureimpactsoftheKeeyaskprojecttotheNelsonRiversystemandestuary,whichhasyettobecompleted,canthereforehavebeenadequatelycapturedinaretrospectiveanalysis.
• RegionalstakeholderswerenotengagedinthedevelopmentoftheRCEA,exceptindirectlythroughreviewofhistoricaltranscriptsandreports,thoughthisisacoreprincipleofgoodpracticeforanyassessmentprocessinCanadaandworldwide.
• ThelistofRSCschosenforthestudyisfairlylimited,withmanywildlifespeciesaffectedbyhydroelectricdevelopmentnotincludedonthelist.ItispossiblethatcertainimportantRSCshavenotbeencaptured,asimpactsarelikelytobeexpressedsooneratotherlevelsofecosystemorganizationthantheyareatthespecieslevel40.SomeRSCscouldcorrespondwithkeyecosystemservices.Forexample,biodiversityunderliesallecosystemservicesandcouldconstituteanRSC.”Supporting”ecosystemservicesincludenutrientcycling,soilformation,primaryproduction;”provisioning”ecosystemservicesincludefoodsupply(foodweb),freshwater,woodandfibre,fuel;“regulating”ecosystemservicesincludeclimateregulation,floodregulation,diseaseregulation,waterpurification;“cultural”ecosystemservicesincludeaesthetic,spiritual,educational,andrecreationalservices.UntilthelistofRSCshasbeenpublicallyandindependentlyvetted,itisnotpossibletodetermineifthelistiscompleteorappropriate.
• TheRCEAdoesnotincludeprospectiveanalysis,whichisacorecomponentofgoodpractice 40Treweek1999
| P a g e
25
CEA.TheTermsofReferenceprecludedprospectiveanalysisinspiteofthefactthatamajorquestionregardingthefuturewelfareoftheenvironmentandcommunitiesinnorthernManitobaisthepotentialformoredams;particularly,whetherornottosanctiontheConawapageneratingstationandothersontheNelsonRiversystem.Manitobahassignificantundevelopedhydropotentialremaininginthenorthandhasalreadyinvestedabout$380millionontheConawapaproject41.
• Ingeneral,saveforafewinstances,theuseofenvironmentalthresholdsthatcouldhelp
assessthesignificanceofhistoricalimpactsonRSCsisavoidedintheRCEA.InPartVWaterandPartVILand,theshorttimelineoftheRSEAwasoftencitedasthereasonthresholdscouldnotbedeveloped.ThereasoncitedinPartIIIPeopleis“lackofsocio-economicanddemographic-specificdatapre-1980s”(PhaseII,PartIII,p.3.3-33),andinPartIVPhysicalEnvironmentitis“absenceofhigh-quality,long-termrecordswithgoodspatialcoverage”(PhaseII,PartIV,p.4.2-5).UseofthresholdsisacceptedasgoodpracticeinCEA.
• Oneofthebiggestopportunitiesinaregionalscaleassessmentistoidentifyopportunities
andpartnershipsforcoordinatedmitigationandmanagementofregionalimpacts.TheRCEAdoesnotaddressthemanagementphaseofCEAbeyondreferencingsomeoftheestablishedprogramsintheregion.Atminimum,providingalistofpastandcurrentmonitoringandremediationprogramsandinitiativesintheRCEAwouldhelptoidentifystrengths,weaknesses,gaps,andopportunitiestostrengthenregionalimpactmanagement.
• Thedominantfocusonthedirect,additiveeffectsofhydroelectricdevelopmentoneach
environmentalcomponentisoneoftheweaknessesoftheRCEA.Arguably,asynergisticapproachlinkingmultiplestressorstoeachcomponentinbothquantitativeandqualitativetermsismorelikelytoyieldusefulperspectiveforansweringquestionsabouttotalimpactsofdevelopmentsonthesocialandbiophysicalenvironment.Withoutsufficientanddeliberateeffortatcharacterizingthesynergisticimpactsofnaturalandhumanperturbations(includinghydro)oneachVEC,atrueunderstandingofcumulativeeffectscannotbeachieved.TheleastthatcouldbedoneistoidentifywheresynergisticinteractionsmightbeaffectingLandandWaterRSCs.TheRCEAmakesacoupleofattemptstodothis,andtheeffortshouldbeexpanded.
• ItisapparentintheRCEAthatthetotalstressoncertainsub-regionsoftheROIismuch
greaterthanothers(thesub-region“Area2”–theNelsonRiverandestuary–beingthemoststressed),buttheRCEAdoesnotattempttoqualifythetotal,cumulativestressplacedonanygivensub-region.
• ThedesignatedROIdoesnotincludeasignificant(southern)portionoftheexistingBipoleI
andIItransmissionline,nordoesitincludetheimminentBipoleIIItransmissionline.Ingeneral,notenoughattentionisgiventotheeffectsoftransmissionlineconstruction,
41ManitobaHydro2017,Tab3,pg.18
| P a g e
26
clearing,andvegetationmaintenanceenmasseintheROI,particularlyifnon-selectivevegetationclearingtechniquesarecommon(e.g.mowing).WhiletheintactnessanalysisinPartVILandconcludesthattheROIremainsreasonablyintact,theeffectsofasinglemajortransmissionright-of-way(suchastheBipoleIandIIcorridor,andtheBipoleIIIcorridor)canbeseriousandpersistenttolocalwildlifeifnotcarefullymitigated42.
• TheRCEAavoidstheissueofsignificancealtogether.Scientificbenchmarksareconsistently
usedtogaugetheseriousnessofnotedcumulativeeffectstoRSCsinPartVWaterandPartVILand,butthesocietalsignificanceofthecumulativeeffectsthroughouttheRCEAisnotaddressed.AssigningsignificancetotheimpactscausedbyhydropowerdevelopmentinnorthernManitobaisnotmerelyascientificexercise.Significanceisdynamic,contextual,political,andultimatelyajudgmentcall:scientistsevaluatesignificancedifferentlyfromoneanotherandfromlocalcommunities43.Ifathresholdhasbeendeemedcrossed,anyfutureimpactonanRSCmustbeconsideredsignificant.
• Thereisinconsistencyintheapproachtakentotheretrospectiveanalysiswhencomparing
PartsIIIandIV(PeopleandPhysicalEnvironment)toPartsVandVI(WaterandLand).WhilemanydefensibleconclusionsaredrawnwithrespecttothecumulativeeffectsofhydroelectricdevelopmentsonWaterandLand,theinformation-provisionapproachthatisadoptedforthePeopleandPhysicalEnvironmentsectionsdoesnotallowforthesamekindsofconclusionstobedrawn.Anovertfocusondescriptionofsocialconditionsandthephysicalsettingwithoutconsiderationtoquantifyingorqualifyingthemagnitudeandpathwaysofcombinedperturbations(hydroandotherdevelopments)onPeopleandPhysicalEnvironmentRSCsisaslipperyslopetowarddiminishingthesubstantivegoalsofaRCEA.
• AttimesinPartVILand,thecumulativeimpactofhydrodevelopmentonanRSCisqualified
relativetotheimpactattributabletootherdevelopments,anddeemedproportionatelyless:thisiswrong-headed,asitisthetotalimpactofallactivitiesonanRSCthatisimportant.Inotherwords,theincrementalimpactsofhydroelectricdevelopmentare‘traded-off’(i.e.minimized)againstthesignificanceofotherdisturbancesintheregion;anerrorthatwasnotedinboththeBipoleIIIandKeeyaskCEAreviews.
4.3KeyrecommendationstoimprovetheManitobaandManitobaHydroRCEAinitiativeTheabovereviewdetailsanumberofconcernsaboutManitobaandManitobaHydro’sapproachtoRCEAforhydroelectricdevelopmentsontheChurchill,BurntwoodandNelsonRiverSystems.Basedonthese,wesuggestanumberofimprovementstheymaywishtoconsider: 42Harriman2000 43Noble2015
| P a g e
27
4.3.1RecommendationsspecifictotheRCEAfiling
i) WerecommendthatthepurposeoftheRCEAbeclearlystated.ItisnotcurrentlyspecifiedastowhethertheRCEAisintendedasaresourcetoinformaprovincialenergypolicy;awatershedprotectionplan;aregionallanduseplan;futureprojectimpactassessments,approvals,orconditions;orafuturestrategicassessmentexercise.WithoutaclearstatementofthetacticalpurposeoftheRCEA,itisdifficulttoconceptualizetheinfluenceofthiswork,itsvalueasaresource,andtowhom.
ii) WerecommendthattheRSClistbepublicallyandindependentlyvetted.
iii) WerecommendthattheRCEAincludeprospectiveanalysis,particularlyrelatedtothe
potentialcumulativeeffectsthatwouldbeinducedbyadditionoftheKeeyaskandConawapagenerationprojectstotheNelsonRiversystemandestuary.
iv) WerecommendthatalloftheBipoleIIItransmissionlinebeincludedaspartoftheROI,and
thatfurtheranalysisofthecumulativeeffectsoftransmissionlineconstruction,clearing,andvegetationmaintenanceenmasseintheROIisundertaken,particularlywithrespecttowildlifehabitatandriparianzonedegradation.
v) WerecommendindependentscientificreviewoftheuseofthresholdsintheRCEAto
determinewhethertheirnearabsenceisjustified.WefurtherrecommendthatManitobaandManitobaHydroinvestthetimeandresourcesnecessarytodevelopscientificenvironmentalthresholdsappropriatetoassistinfutureenvironmentalassessmentsinnorthernManitoba.
vi) Werecommendthatareasonableattemptbemadetocommunicateanysynergisticeffects
intheROIaffectingRSCs,aswellasthetotalcumulativeeffectsonRSCsonanarea-by-areabasis,particularlyfortheNelsonRiversystemandestuaryandothersub-regionsoftheROIexperiencingthegreatesttotallevelsofstress.
vii) TheRCEAuseslinkagediagramstoillustratedrivers,pathways,andeffectsforeachRSCfor
PartVWaterandPartVILand.OtherfactorsinfluencingimpactsonRSCsarenamedineachlinkagediagram.WerecommendamoreexplicitdepictionoftheotherdevelopmentstakenintoaccountintheRCEAanalysis,whenpossible.
viii) WerecommendstakeholderengagementintheRCEAinitiative,particularlytoassistin
scopingRSCsanddeterminingimpactsignificance.WefurtherrecommendthattheMinisterofEnvironmentreinstatethefullpublichearingontheRCEAthatwasoriginallyplanned.ThiswouldhelpimmenselytomodernizeandlegitimizetheRCEAprocessandreport.
ix) WerecommendthattheRCEAreportincludeacompletelistofpastandcurrentmonitoring
andremediationprogramsandinitiativesintheRCEAtofacilitateagapanalysis.Wefurther
| P a g e
28
recommendthattheresultsoftheRCEAshouldinformthedevelopmentofancomprehensiveregionalmonitoringandmanagementplanthatincludespublic,industry,andIndigenouspartnershipsasappropriate,andisbasedoncleararticulationofthresholds,indicators,benchmarks,andactionsforachievingormaintainingsustainabilityofeachRSC.
x) WerecommendthatPartIIIPeopleandPartIVPhysicalEnvironmentbedevelopedbeyondaninformation-provisionapproachtoalsoincluderetrospectiveandprospectiveanalysisofchangetrendsandtheirsignificance.
4.3.2RecommendationsforastrategicRCEAinnorthernManitobaTheMinisterofEnvironmentandtheCEChaverequestedassistanceinidentifyingnextstepsfortheRCEA44.TheRCEAisaforward-lookingdocumentandprocess,andcanbetransformedtoachievetheoriginalintentofCEC’sadviceintheWuskwatimhearing,andNobleandGunn’sadvicetoManitobaHydroduringtheBipoleIIIandKeeyaskprojecthearings.WefeeltransformingtheRCEAfromnon-strategictostrategicisessentialinordertoreachitsfullestpotentialinstrengtheningManitoba’senvironment,economy,andpeople.
i) WerecommendthattheRCEAinitiativeberevisitedasastrategicexercisethatisobjectives-led,includesevaluationofalternativedevelopmentscenarios,andresultsintheselectionofapreferredalternativethatdetailsthedesirednatureandpaceofdevelopmentinnorthernManitobainthefuture.“Thereviewofalternativesisthekeysteptomakeregionalimpactassessmentnotjustaninformationgatheringtoolaboutpastandpresentbutalsoamanagementtooltoaddressthefuture”45.
ii) WefurtherrecommendthattheresultsofastrategicRCEAbeusedtoinformfuturehydroelectricdevelopmentprojectapprovalsinnorthernManitoba,includingtheConawapaGeneratingStationandassociatedinfrastructure,aswellasrelatedregionalpolicyandplanningprocessessuchGrowingOutcomesinWatersheds(GROW)andManitoba’sProvincialCleanEnergyStrategy.
iii) WerecommendthattheopportunitytodesignatetheRCEAROIasoneoftheidentifiable
pilotprojectsforregionalimpactassessmentinCanadabeexplored,asdescribedinBuildingCommonGround:ANewVisionforImpactAssessmentinCanada,thefinalreportoftheExpertPanelfortheReviewofEnvironmentalAssessmentProcesses46.WerecommendthattheManitobaGovernmentusesuchanopportunitytoundertakea“northernvision”projecttohelpestablishthegoalsandobjectivesofastrategicRCEA.
44http://www.gov.mb.ca/sd/eal/registries/5714hydro/revised_cec_t_of_r2017-03-02_v1.pdf 45Gelinas,etal.2017 46Gelinasetal.2017,pg.79,80
| P a g e
29
APPENDIX:DETAILEDANALYSISOFTHERCEAFILINGA.CoreandmethodologicalprinciplesTables1and2summarizetheextenttowhichtheRegionalCumulativeEffectsAssessment(RCEA)currentlyconformstothecoreandmethodologicalprinciplesforRegionalStrategicEnvironmentalAssessmentassetforthbytheCanadianCouncilofMinistersoftheEnvironment(CCME).ThisisintendedasalearningtoolfortheConsumers’AssociationofCanada(CAC)(Manitobachapter)andmaybeviewedashelpfulinformationbytheManitobaCleanEnvironmentCommission(CEC),ManitobaConservationandWaterStewardship,andManitobaHydro.Table1.ConformitytoCCMERegionalStrategicEnvironmentalAssessmentCorePrinciplesCorePrinciplesStrategic Notyet.Theexerciseshouldbe‘objectives-led’.Atpresentthegoalsandobjectivesof
theRCEAarenotexplicitlystatedandthereisnoclear,publiclyendorsedvisionforthefutureoftheRegionofInterest(ROI).
Futures-oriented Notyet.TheRCEAiscurrentlyretrospectiveinnatureonly,withnoprospectiveanalysis,designationofstrategicalternativesfordevelopment,orassessmentofthelikelycumulativeeffectsofthose.
Earlycommencement TheRCEAwascompletedapproximately60yearsafterthecommencementofhydroelectricdevelopmentinnorthernManitoba.However,atleasthalfofthecapacityforhydroelectricpowerintheprovincehasyettobedeveloped,withmoregeneratingstationsbeingconsideredforfuturedevelopment—sixplannedfortheNelsonRiver(fivecurrently),threemorereservoirsontheBurntwood(onecurrently),andtwonewreservoirsplannedfortheUpperChurchillRiver(nonetherecurrently).Thisisaverysignificantamountoffurtherdevelopmenttoaregionthathasalreadybeenacknowledgedassignificantlyaltered.Itisstill‘early’ifoneconsidersthedevelopmentthatstillmaycomeinnorthernManitoba.IntheshorttermthereisopportunitytoinfluencedecisionsaboutthefutureoftheConawapaproject.Inaddition,thereisopportunitytoinformandinfluencestrategicpoliciesandplanssuchasGrowingOurWatershedsandtheProvincialCleanEnergyPlan.
Cumulativeeffectsfocused Yes.However,prospectiveanalysisofstrategicalternativesfortheregionisrecommended.
Multi-tiered Notyet.Thereisnodeliberateconnectionwithproject-basedenvironmentalimpactassessmentidentified,noranyconnectionto‘upstream’policyorplanningdecisionsaffectingtheRegionofInterest(ROI).
Multi-scaled Yes.ScaleofanalysisintheretrospectiveanalysisisadjustedtosuiteachRegionalStudyComponent(RSC).
Participatory Notyet.TheRCEAprocessshouldmeaningfullyengageaffectednortherncommunitiesandotherstakeholdersin(atminimum)thetasksofscoping,creationandanalysisofalternativedevelopmentscenarios,significancedetermination,impactmitigationandmonitoringstrategiesandactivities,adaptivefeedback.
Opportunistic Notyet.Doesnotidentifyopportunitiestoenhanceinstitutionalpoliciesorarrangements,forexample.
Adaptive Notyet.AlthoughacomprehensivelistofpastandcurrentremediationandcompensationeffortsbyManitobaHydroareidentified,nochangestoexistingmanagement,monitoringplansintheregionaresuggestedorintendedasyet.
| P a g e
30
TheRCEAwasnotdesignedasastrategicexercise.Rather,theapproachtakenisthatofaretrospectivedescriptionofpastcumulativeeffectsintheregion.ManitobaConservationandWaterStewardshipandManitobaHydroagreedtoTermsofReferencefortheRCEAinMay,2014.InthemitisstatedthatManitobaandManitobaHydrobelievethebestoptiontoaddressRecommendation13.2,madebytheCleanEnvironmentCommission(CEC)followingtheKeeyaskpublichearing,isthedevelopmentof[aRCEAdocument]thatis“retrospectiveinnature”(p.1)and“describesenvironmentalchangeovertimeasaresultofprevioushydrodevelopment,includingimpacts,mitigationmeasures,communityissues,compensationandthecurrentqualityoftheenvironment”(p.3).TheRCEAis“basedonareviewandsynthesisofpastandongoingstudiesandmonitoringprograms”(p.3).AlthoughtheCECdoesnotspecificallyaskforastrategicassessmentinBipoleIIIRecommendation13.2,previouscallsforstrategicassessmentintheregionhavebeenregistered(e.g.CEC’s2004Wuskwatimrecommendation;GunnandNoble’s2012BipoleIIIrecommendation).ThepositioningoftheRCEAasretrospective,descriptiveexercisepre-empts,orforestalls,asignificantopportunitytopublicallydebatealternativedevelopmentscenariosandidentifyapreferredfuturedevelopmentpathfornorthernManitoba.Italsoprecludesstipulatingthedesirednatureandpaceofdevelopmentinthefutureand/orestablishingcriteriatoevaluatetheacceptabilityofproposedfutureprojects.ThetermsofreferencedonotstatethepurposeforwhichtheRCEAisintendedotherthanitwillserve“asaresource”(p.5).ItisnotspecifiedwhethertheRCEAwouldbeusedasaresourcetoperhapsinformtheManitobaprovincialCleanEnergystrategy,aregionalsustainabledevelopmentplan(e.g.GrowingOurWatershedsinitiative),futureprojectimpactassessmentapprovalsorconditions(e.g.Conawapa),orafutureregionalstrategicassessmentexercise.WithoutaclearstatementofthetacticalpurposeoftheRCEA,itisdifficulttoconceptualizetheinfluenceofthiswork,itsvalueasaresource,andtowhom.Thepreviouscallforacollaborativeapproachtoassessingthecumulativeeffectsofpast,present,andfuturedevelopmentinnorthernManitobahasbeenoverlookedaswell(specificallymentionedintheCEC’s2004WuskwatimrecommendationandimpliedinGunnandNoble’s2012BipoleIIIrecommendation).TheamendedtermsofreferencefortheRCEAhavegreatlyreducedopportunityformeaningfulparticipation,andface-to-faceparticipationfromnorthernresidents–whichwasestablishedasthestandardforconsultationasearlyastheBergerInquiryin1974,whenThomasBergermodelledgoodpracticeforworkingwithIndigenouscommunitiesandmeaningfulengagementinenvironmentalimpactassessment47.Incumulativeeffectsassessment(CEA),publicinputhasbeenshowntobeespeciallyimportantwhenselectingthevaluedcomponentsforstudy48.ThereappearstohavebeennoconsultationwiththepublicorIndigenouscommunitiesinthetasksofscopingRegionalStudyComponents(RSCs);creationandanalysisofalternativedevelopmentscenarios;significancedetermination;impactmitigationandmonitoringstrategiesandactivities;orplanstointegrateadaptivefeedback.ThelistofRSCsappearstohavebeendeterminedbyMBHydroandManitobaConservationandWaterStewardshipactingalone.Aswell,Sections3.5.4through3.5.19ofPhaseII,PartIIIPeople,arecurrentlymissingfromtheRCEAatpresent:
47MulvihillandBaker2001;Gibson2013 48OlagunjuandGunn2013
| P a g e
31
“Communitieswillhavetheopportunitytoreviewandcommentontheirsummaries[ofcumulativeeffectsofdevelopmentonthem]beforetheyaremadepublic.ThisreviewandcommentwilloccurthroughouttheRCEAPublicOutreachProgrambeingundertakenbytheCEC”(PhaseII,PartIII,p.3.5-9).Atthetimeofthisreport,plansforpublicconsultationhavebeengreatlyreducedaspertheamendedTermsofReferenceandthesectionsarestillincomplete.CurrentstrengthsoftheRCEAfromastrategicassessmentstandpointincludethatitiscumulativeeffectsfocused,anditismulti-scaled.Thatbeingsaid,theretrospectiveanalysisofcumulativeeffectstoWaterandLandRSCsisstrongerthanthatforPeople.ConsiderableworkremainstobedonetoadequatelycharacterizecumulativeimpactstoaffectedIndigenouscommunities,andaswell,analysisofsynergisticandindirectenvironmentaleffectstoWaterandLandRSCsisratherweakintheRCEAatpresent.TherearewesternscientificandIndigenoustraditionalknowledgedisparitiesofopinionregardingthecumulativeeffectstocertainWaterandLandRSCs,thetotalstressonsub-regionsandtheROIasawholehasnotbeencharacterizesasyet,andthesignificanceofcumulativeeffectsintheROIhasnotbeenevaluated.Alloftheseobservationsaredescribedinmoredetailinthesectionsbelow.Table2.ConformitytoCCMERegionalStrategicEnvironmentalAssessmentMethodologicalPrinciplesMethodologicalPrinciplesIntegrated Notyet.Focusedonalternatives Notyet.RegionalVEC-based Yes,theRSCsselectedappeartobesensitivetotheregionalcontext(e.g.water
quality,fishcommunity)thoughtheirnumbersaresmallandtheirappropriatenesshasnotbeenpublicallyorindependentlyvetted.Untiltheyare,itwillremainunclearastowhetherthesearethe‘only’or’best’RSCstofocuson.
Interdisciplinary Notyet.AssessmentisnotinterdisciplinaryinthatitdoesnotevaluatethestatusofanyRSCbasedonintegratedscientificperspectivesfromvariousbranchesofknowledge.HowevertheRCEAiscross-disciplinaryinthattherearevariouskindsofscientificanalysisprovided.
Structuredandsystematic Yes,inthesensethattheRCEAsystematicallyexaminesexistinginformation,evaluatesnewinformation,looksatchangesinindicatorsovertime,andsummarizeschangeforRSCsovertheperiodofdevelopmenttotheextentpossiblegivendatalimitations.
CurrentstrengthsoftheRCEAwithrespecttothemethodologicalprinciplessetforthbytheCanadianCouncilofMinistersofEnvironment(CCME)includethatitisregionalVEC-based,inthatthecurrentRSClistdoesincludespeciesofnotedconcernandimportantintheROI,andithasadoptedastructuredandsystematicapproachtotheretrospectiveanalysis.Tobecomeastrategicassessment,theRCEAwouldneedtobeintegratedwithotherregionalpolicyandplanninginitiativessuchthatthereisamutuallyreinforcingrelationship;itwouldneedtoadoptandprospectivelyassessthecumulativeeffectsofalternativedevelopmentscenariosinpreparationtoselectadesiredfuturepathforward;andfinally,theinterdisciplinaryaspectsofcumulativeeffectsanalysiswouldneedtobeimproved.Atpresentamulti-disciplinaryapproachisevidentintheretrospectiveanalysis,buttoexploresynergistsandtotalimpactstotheregion,aninterdisciplinaryapproachto
| P a g e
32
evaluatingtheevidenceiscritical.Forexample,tobetterunderstandthecumulativeeffectstofishquality,forwhich(itisclaimedintheRCEA)thereisnodirectscientificlinkage,thenotedindirectlinkagesmustbeexplored–andifaninterdisciplinaryteamdoesthis,thecumulativeeffectsmightbecomemuchmorereadilyapparent.B.MethodologicalapproachWithrespecttothephasesofabasic,step-wiseprocessestablishedforRegionalStrategicEnvironmentalAssessment49,theRCEAismissingmanykeycomponents.Table3brieflysummarizeswhichstepshavebeenaddressed,andwhichareoutstanding.Table3.ConformitytotheBasicStep-WiseProcessforRegionalStrategicEnvironmentalAssessmentPre-AssessmentDevelopareferenceframework
DoesprovideandconformtoaTermsofReference,thoughTermsofReferencearenon-strategicandtheamendedTermsofReferencegreatlyreduceopportunitiesforpublicengagement.
Scopetheregionalbaseline Yes.ThisisdonereasonablywellwiththecaveatthattherearemanydatagapsthatneedtobeaddressedthroughadditionalresearchintheROI.ThereisastrongbasisforprospectiveanalysisformanyoftheRSCsthatareusedintheRCEAalthoughthatlistshouldbepublicallyandindependentlyvetted,andpossiblyexpanded.
Identifyregionalstressorsandtrends
Doesidentifyhydroelectricdevelopmentsdrivingregionalstressorsortrends,anddoesnameotherdevelopmentsaffectingtheconditionofRSCsintheROIvianetworkdiagrams(however,thisanalysisshouldbeperformedingreaterdepthifandwhenpossible).
AssessmentIdentifystrategicalternativesfortheregion
Notyet.Doesnotcurrentlyidentifystrategicdevelopmentalternativesfortheregion.
Assesscumulativeeffectsofeachalternative
Notyet.Doesattempttoassesscumulativeeffects,butnotforstrategicalternativesfortheregion,andnotprospectively.“TheRCEAisintendedtoretrospectivelyassess(qualitativelyand/orquantitatively)environmentalandsocio-economicchangeovertime”(PhaseII,PartI,pg.1.2-1).
Identifyapreferredstrategicalternative
Notyet.DoesnotidentifyapreferredstrategicalternativethatmeetsstatedgoalsandobjectivesfordevelopmentoftheROI.
Post-Assessment*Identifymitigationneedsandmanagementactions
Notyet.TheRCEAdoesprovideacomprehensiveoverviewofpastandcurrentmitigationandcompensationinitiativesinPartIIIPeople:“Whereapplicable,theassessmentincludesadiscussionofmitigationandremedialworksthathavebeenputinplacetoreduceeffectsandcompensationprovidesforeffectsthatcouldnotbemitigated”(PhaseII,PartI,pg.1.2-6).However,theRCEAdoesnotrevisitthosestrategiesbasedontheresultsofaprospectiveanalysisorsignificancedetermination.Ideallytheseactivitieswouldinformandinfluenceacoordinatedregionalmitigationandmonitoringplangoingforward.
Developafollow-upandmonitoringprogram
Notyet.
Implementthestrategy, Notyet.
49GunnandNoble2009
| P a g e
33
monitorandevaluateAdaptivefollow-upandreview
Notyet.Asthepreferredscenarioisimplemented,lessonslearnedshouldbeusedtoadaptdevelopmentinitiatives,programs,plans,andpoliciesfortheregiontoensuredesiredoutcomesareachieved.
*TheNextStepsdocumenttobeissuedfollowingpublicconsultationontheRCEAhasnotyetbeenissuedbyManitobaandManitobaHydro.Therefore,informationregardingfollow-upandmonitoring,includinganyintendedmitigationandmanagementactionsisunavailableatpresent.Lookingatthebasicstep-wisemethodologicalprocessthathasbeenestablishedforRSEA,theRCEAonlyaddressestwopre-assessmentphasesreasonablywellatpresentandtheyare:scopingtheregionalbaselineandidentifyingstressorsortrends.IftheRCEAweretobetransformedintoastrategicexercise,anewTermsofReferencewouldhavetobeissuedtoreflecttheactivitiesstilltocomeintheassessmentandpost-assessmentphasesoftheframework.Theassessmentphasewouldbecenteredaroundidentifyingandevaluatingstrategicalternativestothe‘statusquo’hydroelectricdevelopmentpath.Thepost-assessmentphasewouldbefocusedoncarefullyadaptingthecurrentmitigationandmonitoringregimeintheROIbasedonthesignificancedeterminationofidentifiedcumulativeimpactsintheROI.Theapproachwouldbecomeproactive,withtheRSC-sustainabilityatitsheart.Thatbeingsaid,compensationprogramssuchastheNorthernFloodAgreement(NFA)wouldnaturallyretaintheirimportanceandbemaintainedintothefuture.C.CumulativeeffectsassessmentThispartofourreviewprovidesadetailedanalysisofthecumulativeeffectsassessment(CEA)exerciseundertakeninrelevantsubsectionsofPartIIIPeople,PartIVPhysicalEnvironment,PartVWater,andPartVILandofthePhaseIIRCEAreport.ManitobaandManitobaHydro’sguidanceforundertakingCEAapparentlyconsistsofconsultingtheHegmannetal.(1999)guidance:wewereunabletofindreferencetoanyotherguidancewithintheRCEAreport(thoughitisaverylengthyreportanditispossibleweoverlookedadditionalsourcesthatwereconsulted).TheHegmannguidanceisstillrelevantandwidelyused,however,manyothergoodreferencemanualsarepublicallyavailable,including:
• CanadianCouncilofMinistersoftheEnvironment(CCME),2009.RegionalstrategicenvironmentalassessmentinCanada:Principlesandguidance.CanadianCouncilofMinistersoftheEnvironment,Winnipeg,MB.
• CanadianEnvironmentalAssessmentAgency,2014.TechnicalguidanceforassessingcumulativeeffectsundertheCanadianEnvironmentalAssessmentAct,2012.CEAA,ON,Canada.Availableathttp://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca
• CanterLandSadlerB,1997.AtoolkitforeffectiveEIApractice–Reviewofmethodsand
perspectivesontheirapplication.InternationalAssociationforImpactAssessment,Fargo,ND,USA.
| P a g e
34
• CouncilonEnvironmentalQuality(CEQ),1997.ConsideringcumulativeeffectsundertheNationalEnvironmentalPolicyAct.ExecutiveOfficeofthePresidentoftheUnitedStates,Washington,DC,USA.
• DuinkerP,BurbidgeE,BoardleyS,GreigL,2013.Scientificdimensionsofcumulativeeffects
assessment:towardimprovementsinguidanceforpractice.EnvironmentalReviews21(1):40-52.1dx.doi.org/10.1139/er-2012-0035.Availableathttp://www.nrcresearchpress.com/journal/er
• Duinker,PandGreigL,2007.Scenarioanalysisinenvironmentalimpactassessment:
Improvingexplorationsofthefuture.EnvironmentalImpactAssessmentReview27:206-219.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.11.001
• HegmannGandYarrantonG,2011.Alchemytoreason:Effectiveuseofcumulativeeffects
assessmentinresourcemanagement.EnvironmentalImpactAssessmentReview31(5):484-490.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.01.011
• IndianandNorthernAffairsCanada,2007.Acitizen’sguidetocumulativeeffects.Ministerof
PublicWorksandGovernmentServicesCanada,Ottawa,ON,Canada.
• InternationalFinanceCorporation,2013.Cumulativeimpactassessmentandmanagementguidancefortheprivatesectorinemergingmarkets:Goodpracticehandbook.WorldBankGroup,Washington,DC,USA.Availableathttp://www.ifc.org
• Noble,B.2014.Introductiontoenvironmentalimpactassessment:Aguidetoprinciplesand
practice,3rdedition.OxfordUniversityPress:Toronto.ScopeSpatialscopeScopingtheRCEAasaretrospectiveexerciseratherthanastrategicexerciserepresentsamissedopportunityinlightoftheCEC’spaststatementsidentifyingtheneedforastrategicassessmentofcumulativeeffectsintheregion.Thatbeingsaid,spatially,theROIfortheRCEA50includestheChurchill,BurntwoodandNelsonRiversystemswhichisanareabroaderthanthatidentifiedintheCEC’sBipoleIIIrecommendation.TheROIwasdesignatedassuchbecauseitcaptures“themainareasdirectlyaffectedbyManitobaHydro’snortherndevelopmentsassociatedwithLWR,CRD,associatedtransmissionprojects,andotherassociatedinfrastructure”(PhaseII,PartI,p.1.3-2).However,RCEAshouldscopedwidelyenoughtoincludeattentiontoindirecteffectsaswell,asmayaffectotherareasoftheprovince.Itisnotedthatthe“spatialscopeforPeople,Physical 50SeeMap1.3.2.1.RCEARegionofInterest–Areas1-4,andMap1.3.2.2AssessmentAreas(bothinPhaseIIreport,PartI).
| P a g e
35
Environment,Water,andLandvaryforsocio-economicandbiophysicalreasons”(PhaseII,PartI,p.1.3-2)(seeSec.3.2.11forPeople,Sec.4.1.1.1forPhysicalEnvironment,Sec.5.1.2.2forWater,andSec.6.1.2.2.forLand),soitispossiblethatsomeindirecteffectsarecapturedbutnotspecificallyhighlightedintheRCEA.TheRCEAROIdoesnotincludethesouthernportionoftheBipoleIandIItransmissionlinecorridor,nordoesitincludetheplannedBipoleIIItransmissionlinecorridor.TheROIdoesnotincludeportionsoftheGrandRapidstoPonton230kVline,theHerbletLaketoRallsIsland230kVline,theHerbletLaketoCliffLake230kVline,etc.TheexplanationforthisisprobablythattheregionofinterestisalreadylargerthanthatrecommendedintheCEC’sBipoleIIIreportsoperhapsitcannotbecritiquedfromthatperspective.Buttechnically,theRCEAshouldincludeALLofthedevelopment,includingthesouthernportionoftheBipoleIandII,andespeciallytheBipoleIIIasitisanapprovedandimminentdevelopment.Itisimportanttoconsideralllineardevelopmentswhenassessingland-basedcumulativeeffectsfromtheperspectiveofhabitatfragmentation.Theassessmentdoesnotfullyaccountfortheeffectsofroadbuildingontheenvironmentovertime.Roaddevelopmentsarecapturedinanintactnessassessment,buttheimpactsofroadsareverycomplex,far-andlong-reaching,andmulti-faceted.Theindirecteffectsofroadbuildingarearguablyfarmoreinsidiousthanthedirecteffectsoftheirinitialconstruction.Roadsbringpeopleinandresourcesoutofaregion,foreveralteringtheenvironment,economy,andcultureofaregion.Someoftheknownimpactsofroadsinclude:increasedwildlifemortalityassociatedwithconstruction;increasedhumanmortalityduetovehiclecollision;modificationofwildlifebehavior;alterationofthephysicalenvironment;alterationofthechemicalenvironment;spreadofexoticspecies;increasedalterationanduseofhabitatsbyhumans;emissionsofair,noise,lightandheatpollution;regionaleffectssuchasfragmentationofwildlifehabitatsandrapidcommunitygrowth,tolong-termeffectssuchasglobalwarmingeffectsfromcarbondioxideemissions51.InthecontextoftheROI,totakejustoneexample,therehavebeennotedsignificanteffectstothecommercialfisheryforLakeSturgeonontheNelsonRiver(seePhaseII,PartV,p.5.4-5),andothercommercialfisheriesintheROI–someofthispressuremayhavebeenfacilitatedbythepresenceofroadswhichprovideaccesstolocalandothermarkets.ThespatialscopeoftheROImaypossiblyexcludesomecommunitiespotentiallyaffectedbytheLakeWinnipegRegulationproject(outsidethesouthernextentoftheROI)andotherpotentiallyaffectedcommunitiessuchastheShamattawaFirstNation“becausecurrentunderstandingssuggestthecommunityisnotdirectlyaffectedbythehistorichydroelectricdevelopmentsunderconsideration”(e.g.TheShamattawaFirstNation,p.3.2-3).Nothingissaidregardingwhetherthedevelopmentoffuturehydroelectricprojectsmayalterthisassumption.Itisacknowledgedthatthereareanumberofotherfactors,beyondhydroelectricdevelopment,thathaveaffectedtheRCEAROI(PhaseII,PartI,p.2.6-1):“Theseinclude,amongotherthings:miningdevelopments,highwaydevelopments;theestablishmentofcommercialresourceharvesting
51TrombulakandFrisell2000;Olagunju2012
| P a g e
36
activities,governmentpoliciesandacts,theintroductionofwesternschoolsandchurches,theestablishmentofareliableelectricalsupply,andconnectionofsomeoftheRCEAROIcommunitiestootherpartsofManitobavianewhighwaysandotherroadsystems”.ManitobaandManitobaHydroclaimthattheeffectsoftheseotherprojectshavebeenconsideredwhentheycanprovidecontextorotherrelevantinformation:
Whenassessingimpactstotheaquaticenvironment,“theeffectsofotherprojects(e.g.mines)andactivities(e.g.commercialfishing)arediscussedtotheextentthattheyprovideoverallcontext,butthefocusoftheassessmentisonthecumulativeeffectsofhydroelectricdevelopmentintheROI”(PhaseII,PartI.,pg.1.2-6).
TheRCEAfocusesontheeffectsofhydroelectricdevelopment,however,theeffectsofotherdevelopments(e.g.mines)andactivities(e.g.commercialfishing)aredescribedatahighleveltoprovidecontextfortheassessment”(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.1-1).
Incaseswhereeffectsofhydroelectricdevelopmentcannotbeseparatedfromothereffects,theyareaddressedinmeasuresofcurrentcondition.Forexample,thesectiononPeopleattemptstodescribeinqualitativetermskeyhistoricaleventsandlargeresourcedevelopments(e.g.treaties,residentialschoolsystem,reservesystem,transportationdevelopment,miningandforestry).Thecombinationofeffectsmayleadtoadeclineinfishpopulationforexample,wheneachinisolationwouldnothaveresultedinapopulationdecline(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.1-11).However,ManitobaHydrocontinuallyassertsthatitisdifficulttoisolatetheeffectsofhydroelectricdevelopmentfrommanyotheragentsofchangeintheROI(e.g.Section3.5.3pages3.5-5to3.5-6).Thishydroelectricdevelopment-focusedapproachisconsistentacrossallRSCsconsidered.ThereisnoevidenceintheentirePhaseIIthattheeffectsofotherprojectsaresystematicallyexaminedandfactorintotheconclusionsreachedonRCEA.Theymayormaynothavebeen.ThespatialscopeofanalysisisadjustedtosuiteachRSC,whichiswidelyconsideredgoodpracticeinCEA.Typically,asub-regional(sometimeslocationspecific)approachtoassessingeffectsisutilized(e.g.thehydrauliczonesidentifiedinPartIVPhysicalEnvironment;forPartIIIPeople,theresourcemanagementareas/registeredtraplineareas,andthetraditionaluseareas;forPartVWaterthefourmainRCEAareas,andforPartVILand,theterrestrialregionsandterrestrialecozones),andattimestheboundaryofanalysisisextendedbeyondtheROItocapturetheextentofmigratoryhabitat.Thereisevidencethroughoutthattheseregionsarerespectedintheretrospectiveanalysis.Forexample:
TheassessmentoftheaquaticenvironmentdividedtheRCEARegionofInterestintofourareas…TheseareaswereusedfortheLakeSturgeon,mercuryinfish,fishquality,seals,andbelugaRSCs.Forthewaterquality…andfishcommunity…RSCs,eachareawasfurthersubdivided…tofacilitatethediscussions(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.1-1).TheeffectsofhydroelectricdevelopmentoneachRSCwillbediscussedfirstbyarea(orsubdivisionwithintheareawhereapplicable)andthenfortheRCEAROIasawhole(PhaseII,
| P a g e
37
PartV,p.5.1-1).TemporalscopeThetemporalscopeoftheRCEAisretrospectiveonlyandfocusedon“theeffectsofprevioushydro-electricdevelopmentintheROI”(PhaseII,PartI,pg.1.2-1).Informationanddataupto2013areutilizedintheRCEA.Averylimitedamountofinformationfrom2014and2015hasalsobeenincorporated(PhaseII,PartI,p.1.3-5).AlistofpastdevelopmentsconsideredintheRCEAisprovided(PhaseII,PartI,Table1.3.2-1).Theseincludegenerationandwaterregulationprojects,converterstationsandassociatedinfrastructureprojects,andtransmissionprojects.SeveralprojectscurrentlyindevelopmentorregulatoryreviewareincludedintheRCEA:theBipoleIIItransmissionproject,KeewatinohkConverterStationandassociatedinfrastructureprojects,theKeeyaskgenerationproject,andtheKeeyasktransmissionproject.However,analysisofimpactsintheRCEAisstrictlyconfinedtoanhistoricalanalysisofpastimpactsbasedonrecordsandmonitoringdatapublishedpreviousto2013.WefailtoseehowthefutureimpactsoftheKeeyaskprojecttotheNelsonRiversystemandestuary,whichhasyettobecompleted,canthereforehavebeenadequatelycapturedinaretrospectiveanalysis.Thereisnoprospectiveanalysisortrendprojectionintothefuture:“Thecumulativeeffectsofanypotentialfuturehydroelectricdevelopments(i.e.thosenotcurrentlybeingconstructedorpartofanyformalregulatoryprocess)willbeaddressedoutsideoftheRCEA,duringtheregulatoryreviewprocessforthosedevelopments”(PhaseII,PartI,pg.1.3-8).ThetemporalscaleoftheassessmentdoesnotincludeanyaspectoffuturehydroelectricdevelopmentinnorthernManitoba.ScopeofregionalstudycomponentsRegionalStudyComponentswereselectedbyManitobaandManitobaHydrowithnopublicinput.Selectioncriteriawereoneormoreofthefollowing(PartII,Phase1,p.1.3-14):
• Overallimportance/valuetopeopleasidentifiedbyresidentsintheROIthroughvariousforums(e.g.,CEChearings,ATKreportsfromtheFirstNations,NFAclaims)
• Umbrellaindicator(anindicatorthatrepresentschangesforabroadgroupofspeciesandoneormoreecologicalpathways)
• Importance/valuetooverallecosystemfunction• Knowntobesusceptibletodirectorindirecteffectsfromhydroelectricdevelopments.
ForPartV.Water,theRSCsinclude:1)waterquality;2)fishcommunity;3)LakeSturgeon;4)mercuryinfishandfishquality;5)belugaandseals(PhaseII,PartI,p.1,3-16).ForPartVI.Land,theRSCsinclude:1)terrestrialhabitat;2)intactness;3)birds(waterfowlandcolonialwaterbirds);4)furbearers(aquatic,i.e.beaver);5)caribou;6)moose;and7)polarbear(PhaseII,PartI,p.1.3-17).AlthoughinitiallyconsideredinPhaseI,inPhaseIIforestbirdsandterrestrialfurbearersweredroppedasRSCsub-components(PhaseII,PartI,p.1.3-14)].OtherpotentialRSCswereconsideredanddroppedornotevaluatedincertainareasoftheROI,withrationalesprovided.Forexample:
| P a g e
38
ItshouldbenotedthattheaquaticassessmentofeffectstotheNelsonandChurchillRiverestuarieswaslimitedtobelugaandseals,whicharethespeciesofgreatestconcern.Duetothelargetidesthatmakeitdifficulttoworkintheestuary,thereisanalmostcompleteabsenceofhistoric,qualitativedataforwaterqualityandthefishcommunity,whicharesubsequentlynotdiscussedforestuaries”(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.1-5).Withfurtherresearch,ithasbecomeapparentthattherearefewtonopopulationdataavailableforterrestrialfurbearersinManitoba,andlimitedinformationregardingtheirdistributionwithintheRCEAROI…thegreatestimpactsonfurbearershavelikelyresultedwithintheriparianzonesaffectedbyfloodingordewatering.Therefore,theeffectsassessmentforfurbearerswillfocusonaquaticfurbearers,usingbeaverasthefocalspecies(PhaseII,PartVI,p.6.1-6).
AlthoughtheRCEAcannotincludeallaffectedspeciesasthiswouldgoagainstthepurposeofscoping(whichistofocustheassessment),therationaleforWaterandLandRSCselectionsaresomewhatquestionable.Regardingaquaticfur-bearers,floodinganddewateringhavelikelyequallyimpactedotherimportantspeciesapartfromthebeaver,akeystonespecies.Noterrestrialfur-bearersatallwereselectedasRSCs.Otherimportantfur-bearersintheborealecosysteminclude:fisher,muskrat,mink,marten,fox,wolverine(westernwolverineislistedas‘SpecialConcern’byCOSEWIC52),otter(listedas‘Threatened’byCOSEWIC),wolves,lynx,bobcat,etc53.Wehavethesamekindsofconcernsaboutscopingofbirdspecies:ofallpossiblespecies,theRSClistislimitedtojustwaterfowlandcolonialbirds.AccordingtotheNatureConservancy,325birdspeciesrelyontheborealforestfornestingormigratorystopoverhabitat54.BoththeNelsonandChurchillRiversemptyintoestuaries.Estuarineenvironmentsareknowntobeespeciallyimportantashabitatthatsupportslocalwildlifehabitat,andespeciallysensitive.Estuariesarenaturallyhighlyproductive,producingmorefishbiomasspercubicmeterofwaterthaneitherfreshwaterormarineenvironments55.SealsandbelugaareidentifiedasRSCs,(verylittleisknownaboutthecumulativeimpactsuponthemoverthelasthalfcenturyrelatedtohydroelectricdevelopment),buttheconnectionamongfishabundance,quality,andavailability,andimpactstosealsandbelugaarenotmadeeventhoughitisnotedthatscientific“evidencesuggeststhatestuariesmaybeimportantfeedingareasforseals”(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.7-2).Belugaare“red-listedbytheInternationalUnionforConservationofNature(ICUN)as‘NearThreathened’”(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.8-2).PartIIIoftheRCEAisnotspecificonwhethertheevaluationofcumulativeeffectstoPeoplewasguidedbyRCSs;rathertheidentificationofissues/eventspresumedtohavehadsomecumulative
52 CommitteeontheStatusofEndangeredWildlifeinCanada 53See:http://thefurbearers.com/about-us/who-are-the-fur-bearers 54 See:https://www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/regions/northamerica/canada/explore/birds-of-the-boreal-forest.xml
55 Weddell2002
| P a g e
39
effectsontheROIisthefocalpointofthisportionoftheassessment.Thefollowingsocio-economiceffectsareindividuallylinkedtogenerationandtransmissionprojects(PhaseII,PartIII,p.3.2-8):
• ResourceUse;• Navigation,TransportationandPublicSafety;• Culture,WayofLifeandHeritageResources;• HealthIssuesandConcerns;• TheWaytheLandscapeLooks(Aesthetics);• HomeRelocation;• WorkerInteraction;• LandUse;• PersonalPropertyLossandDamage;• InfrastructureandServices;• BenefitsofElectrification;and• Employment,Training,BusinessandIncomeOpportunities.
Whilethereishighprobabilitythattheymirrorbroadindicatorsofsocio-economicsatisfactionand/orpotentialregionalsocio-economicchange,noevidenceexiststhataffectedcommunitiesidentifiedtheseasissuesofconcern.InPhaseII,PartIII,onp.3.2-8,itisstatedthat:“ThesourcesusedinthedevelopmentofthisChapterincludepastenvironmentalimpactassessments,pastsettlementnegotiations,perspectivessharedbycommunities,theMMFandresourceusergroupsovertime,andvariouscommunity-ledstudiesandhistoriesthathavebeensharedwithManitobaandManitobaHydro.”Evidently,nodirecteffortwasmadetoengagethecommunityevenonthesocio-economicissuesperceivedtobetriggeredbythehydrodevelopmentintheregion.Threebroad“componentsofthephysicalenvironment”wereidentifiedasfocalpointsfortheassessmentinPhaseIIPartIVPhysicalEnvironment.Theywerefurtherbrokendowntosub-components/indicatorstohelptrackenvironmentalchanges(e.g.soils,geology,topography,permafrostandPeatlandsforgeographiclandscape).Theyareexaminedfromalocation-specificcontext(nottiedtocumulativeeffects)basedonthe12hydraulicspatialzonesidentified.Overall,thelistofRSCsusedintheRCEAisfairlylimited,withmanywildlifespeciesaffectedbyhydroelectricdevelopmentnotincludedonthelist.ItispossiblethatcertainimportantRSCshavenotbeencaptured,asimpactsarelikelytobeexpressedsooneratotherlevelsofecosystemorganizationthantheyareatthespecieslevel56.SomeRSCscouldcorrespondwithkeyecosystemservices.Forexample,biodiversityunderliesallecosystemservicesandcouldconstituteaRSC.”Supporting”ecosystemservicesincludenutrientcycling,soilformation,primaryproduction;”provisioning”ecosystemservicesincludefoodsupply(foodweb),freshwater,woodandfibre,fuel;“regulating”ecosystemservicesincludeclimateregulation,floodregulation,diseaseregulation,waterpurification;“cultural”ecosystemservicesincludeaesthetic,spiritual,educational,andrecreationalservices.UntilthelistofRSCshasbeenpublicallyandindependentlyvetted,itisnot
56Treweek1999
| P a g e
40
possibletodetermineifthelistiscompleteorappropriate. ScopeofpublicengagementIntermsofwhowasinvolvedinpreparingtheRCEA,regionalstakeholderswerenotengagedexceptindirectlythroughreviewofhistoricaltranscriptsandreports,thoughthisisacoreprincipleofgoodpracticeforanyassessmentprocessinCanadaandworldwide.PublicengagementisplannedsubsequentlyintheformofacommentperiodonlineandwithlimitedopportunitiestomeetwiththeCECinperson.TheMinisterofConservationandWaterStewardshiprequestedoftheCECthatitcarryoutapublicoutreachprogramfollowingthesubmissionofthePhaseIIreport(PhaseII,PartI,pg.1.1-2).ThiswillincludepublicmeetingswithallpotentiallyaffectedFirstNationsandothercommunitiesidentifiedintheassessmentstudyareaandtheManitobaMetisFederation.Web-basedreviewofthePhaseIIreportwillalsobefacilitatedforinterestedpartiesoutsidetheROI(PhaseII,PartI,p.1.2-7).ThePhaseIIportionoftheRCEAismeantservetoasabasistoinformdiscussionwithcommunities.Thekeyobjectiveswithregardtocommunityconsultation(whichwillincludeAboriginalandothercommunities)appearstobe:tocheckaccuracyinpresentingpastandcurrenteffects,andidentifyanyadditionalsourcesofinformationthatmighthavebeenmissed(PhaseII,PartI,pg.1.1-2).Apparently,“effortshavealsobeenmadetocaptureandpresentcommunityissuesandconcernsthroughouteachofthemaincomponentsofthePhaseIIdocument”(PhaseII,PartI,pg.1.2-6)–buttothelimitedextentthatthismayhavehappened,itwasaccomplishedentirelythroughpost-hocanalysis.Forexample,theRCEAprocessdidnotengagestakeholdersintermsofanefforttodocumentandrecordtheircurrentconcernsbutreliedinsteadonexistingrecordstomaketheirjudgmentonsocio-economiceffectsintheROI.Therelianceonsecondarysources(thoughextensive)missestheopportunityforcommunitiestodebatetheimpactsofhydroelectricdevelopmentintheROIandperhapsdoesnotfulfillthelegalobligationtoconsultandaccommodateIndigenousinterestsonAboriginallandsasmentionedintheRCEAfilingitself(PhaseII,PartIII,p.3.3-29).ThereareplacesinPartVWaterandPartVILandwherethescientificandIndigenousviewpointsontheenvironmentalimpactsoncertainRSCsareplainlydivergent,suchasregardingimpactstothefishcommunity,fishquality,andCoastalcaribou.Forexample:“Thereisnoscientificevidencetosuggestthatthetaste,textureorpalatabilityoffishhasbeenaffectedbyhydroelectricdevelopmentinArea1.However,thepeoplewhoconsumethefishinthecommunitieshaveclearlyidentifiedthisasanissuethatisrelatedtothehydroelectricdevelopment”(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.6-10).ThismakesanevenstrongercasetoengageIndigenouscommunitiesandotheraffectedcommunityinterestsinevaluatingenvironmentalimpactsandpreparingtheRCEA.Itisourconsideredviewthat,whilethepotentialdifficultyto“definitivelyorquantitativelyseparatetheimpactsoftheseotherdevelopments,eventsandpoliciesfromhydroelectricdevelopment”(PhaseII,PartIII,p.3.2-6)maybeagenuinedrawbackanddeservestoberecognized,suchconsiderationisoutweighedbythepotentialbenefitstotheROIcommunitiestodebate,
| P a g e
41
understand,andanticipatetheimpactsofhydrodevelopmentsinthecontextofsocio-economictrendsandpatternsintheregion. RetrospectiveAnalysisThisisalargelyapproachedasadescriptiveexercisewithnonewdatacollected;however,somedenovoanalysisisperformed.
ThereportincludesthecollationandanalysesofexistinginformationandavailabledatafortheROIand,insomecases,presentsnewanalysesfordatathatwerepreviouslycollectedbutnotanalyzedorinterpreted(PhaseII,PartI,pg.1.1-2).
Theinformationsourcesincludefindingsofscientificandcommunity-basedstudies,ongoingmonitoringprograms,regulatoryprocessesandsettlementsnegotiationsandclaimsprocesses(PhaseII,PartI,pg.1.1-2).TheRCEAaddressesbothenvironmentalandsocio-economiceffects.PartIIIPeopleprovidesaverydetailedhistoricalaccountofthesocio-economiceffectsofhydroelectricdevelopmentintheROI,whilePartIVPhysicalEnvironmentgivesanelaboratecharacterizationofthephysicalenvironmentalimpactsonthehydrauliczonesidentified—bothsectionsareusedtosupportLandandWaterwhicharethestrongestPartsofPhaseIIintermsofretrospectiveanalysis.EstablishingbaselineconditionsTheRCEAconsistentlyattemptstosummarizethecumulativeimpacttoeachRSCfromthepre-developmentperiodthroughtotheyear2013andassesstheoverallhealthoftheselectedRSCswithintheregionalecosystem,whileclearlyidentifyinginformationsourcesandacknowledgingdatalimitations.PastassessmentsintheROItypicallydidnotattempttointegrateinformationcollectedundervariousprogramsinthesamewaterbody(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.2-13andp.5.3-9),whereas,notably,theRCEAdoes.WhereintegrationofpastdataisperformedintheRCEA,itshouldberegardedasasignificantcontributionoftheretrospectiveanalysisgiventhatthiseffortcontributesnewinformationaboutthestateoftheenvironmentintheROI.Alsonotably,theRCEAcomparespre-developmentconditionstoconditionsduringthedevelopmentperiodinmanyinstanceswheredataisavailable,forallParts:People,PhysicalEnvironment,LandandWater.TheRCEAalsocompareson-site/on-systemconditionswithoff-site/off-systemconditionsinmanyinstanceswheredataisavailableforPartVWaterandPartVILand.Bothofthesearegoodpractices,inourview.Thatbeingsaid,datawereverylimitedinmostcasesforpre-developmentperiodsandtherewasoftennotenoughdatacollectedovertheyearstoassesschangeovertime,forexample,asrelatedtothehealthofthefishcommunityintheROI(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.3-9).Otherdatalimitationsincludedanalmosttotallackofdataonfurbearers(informationonthesinglefurbearerRSC-beaver-wasavailableinjusttwoterrestrialregions,yetimpactassessmentresultswereextrapolatedtothewholeROI);thereisessentiallynothingknownaboutimpactstosealsandbeluga,colonialseabirds(although,reportedly,therehaslikelybeenalargeimpact)orthereasonthatLakeSturgeonpopulationsremainstressedanddepressed.
| P a g e
42
Asaresult,changewasoftendiscussedqualitatively,basedonthecurrentstateofknowledgeandpaststudies,aswellaspreviouslycapturedAboriginaltraditionalknowledge.Forexample:
Insomecases,whereahistoricquantitativeorqualitativeassessmentisnotpossible,currentinformationfrommonitoringprogramssuchasManitobaandManitobaHydro’sCoordinatedAquaticMonitoringProgram(CAMP)providestheabilitytodescribethecurrentstateoftheenvironmentandhowitcomparestootheron-systemandoff-systemareas(PhaseII,PartI,pg.1.2-5).
Thelackofdataincertaininstancesdidnotpreclude‘comprehensiveanalysis’ofimpactstosomeRSCs.Forexample,waterqualitydataandfishcommunitydatafromnumeroussourceswerecompiledforselectedsitesandwaterbodiesandanalysed,inspiteofdatalimitations.ManitobaHydroclaimsthereisenoughdatatoprovideageneralindicationoflikelylong-term,markedeffectsofhydroelectricdevelopmentonthefishcommunityformostmajorlakes(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.3-9).Generallyspeaking,however,thesignificantdatagapslendadegreeofuncertaintytosomeofimpactcharacterizationsintheRCEA.Belowisapartiallistofacknowledgeddatagaps:
• verylittleisknownaboutimpactstosealsintheNelsonandChurchillRiverestuariesbasedona“lackofquantitativepre-andpost-hydroelectricdevelopmentdata”(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.7-4);
• “afewwaterfowlspecieshavedecreasingtrends.However,species-specificpopulationtrendswerenotexaminedfurtherinthisstudyduetoarelativelackofdetailedwaterfowldata,andthenumerousfactors(e.g.winteringhabitat)beyondtheRCEAROIthataffectwaterfowlpopulations”(PhaseII,PartVILand,p.6.4-75);
• verylittleisknownaboutimpactstobeluga“duetoalackofquantitativepre-andpost-hydroelectricdevelopmentdata,whichprecludesadeterminationofhydroelectricdevelopmenteffectsonbelugaintheRCEAROI”(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.8-6);
• “…thereisalackofsuitablepre-developmentdataonfishmercuryconcentrationsformostwaterbodiesintheROI”(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.5-11);
• “verylittleinformationexistsonmercuryconcentrationsofLakeSturgeoninArea1overthepast50years,particularlyforyearspredatingLWR[LakeWinnipegRegulation]”(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.5-27);and
• “Forthisassessment,post-hydroelectricdevelopmentpopulationdensities[ofbeaver]areonlyavailablefortwoterrestrialregions;therefore,datafortheseareaswereusedtoassessrelativechangeinpopulationsduetohydroelectricdevelopment”(PhaseII,PartVI,p.6.6-6).
Adatagapanalysis,lookingacrossallRSCs,wouldgeneratealistofadditionalstudiesneededtoinformfuturedecisionsaboutprojectsthatarebeingconsideredforfuturedevelopmentintheROIsuchasConawapaandthefiveadditionalreservoirsfortheNelsonRiverandestuary.AprioritizedagendaforadditionalresearchintheROIshouldbedeveloped,inpartbasedonpublicfeedbackandissuesofimportancetothem.Moreinformationisalsoneededtoresolvesomeoftheconflictsof
| P a g e
43
scientificandIndigenousopiniononthenatureofimpactstocertainRSCssuchasfishcommunity,fishquality,andCoastalcaribou,asnotedabove. WithregardtocumulativeeffectsonPeople(PhaseII,Part1,pg.1.3-12),theapproachtakenistocreateaprofileandhistoryforeachofthe21FirstNationsandcommunitiesintheROI,basedondocumentedtestimonyfromthecommunities.Totheextentpossible,alongitudinalanalysisofcertaindemographicindicatorsismadeforeachcommunity,acknowledgingtherangeofotherfactors,inadditiontohydro-electricdevelopment,thathavechangedthelivesofROIresidents.RelyingondatafromgovernmentbodiesandtechnicalreportssuchasStatisticsCanada,AboriginalandNorthernDevelopmentCanada,andLakeWinnipegChurchillNelsonRiversStudyBoard,trendsonpopulation,economic,healthandwellness,andothersocio-economicfactorsareprovidedinSection3.3.Manyofthedataarealsopresentedintablesandbarchartsdependingonthecharacteristicsofthecomponents,whichmaybeadequatesincehistoricalsocio-economicissuesareinfocus.InPartIV(PhysicalEnvironment),muchofthedataforthesectionisdrawnfromhistoricalrecordsandsecondarysourcese.g.forerosionandsedimentation:“Theinformationpresentedwaslargelyderivedfromareviewoftheavailableliteraturethatreportedonwaterqualityanderosionmonitoringprogramsoveraboutthelast40years”(p.4.1-5).Asnotedearlier,thesub-sectiononErosionandSedimentationemployedsomegoodpracticeanalyticaltechniquessuchasLandsatandAirPhotoAnalysis.ThesedimentationsectionpresentsinformationonTotalSuspendedSolids(TSS),turbidityandSecchidepthsreportedinhistoricalandcontemporarydatasources(p.4.4-7).ForWaterandLand,thePhaseIIreportprovidesasassessment,totheextentpossible,oftheeffectsofpasthydroelectricdevelopmentsontheaquaticandterrestrialenvironments.Wheredatagapsexistadescriptionofthecurrentstateoftheenvironmentisprovided,whereavailable.ConsiderationofchangetrendsThereisacknowledgmentthatinareasaffectedbyhydroelectricdevelopment,thenaturalhydrologicalregimewasaltered,tovaryingdegrees.Driversofchangearelistedas:flooding;reversalofflowpatterns;transmissionlines;lineardevelopmentssuchasaccessroads;andotherinfrastructure(notspecified)(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.1-2).Specificdriversofchange,or“primarypathwaysofeffects”(seeFigure5.1.2-1inPhaseII,PartV)inareaswithincreasedwaterlevelsmayinclude:
• increasedwaterdepthandchangestowatervelocity;• reversalofthetimingofflows(e.g.increasedwinterflowsanddecreasedsummerflows);• changesintherateandmagnitudeofwaterlevelfluctuations;• changesinicecover/slushiceandtimingoffreezing;• changesinwaterqualityduetodecompositionofvegetationandleachingofmaterialsfrom
floodedsoils;• increasesinerosionandsedimentdeposition;lossofaquatichabitatduetothephysical
presenceofthesefacilities;• theblockageofupstreamfishmovements;
| P a g e
44
• floodingofterrestrialhabitatandcreationofnewaquatichabitat;and• increaseddebrisinthewaterandalongtheshorelines.
Asimilarlistofprimarypathwaysofeffectsisalsoprovidedforareaswithdecreasedwaterlevels.TheRCEAconsistentlyprovidesahigh-leveloverviewofpredominantpathwaysofeffectsintheformofnetworkdiagramsthatillustratedrivers,pathways,andeffectsforeachselectedRSCforPhysicalEnvironment,Land,andWater(anacceptedCEAmethod).OthersectorsofdevelopmentcontributingstresstoeachRSCintheregionarealsoidentifiedinthenetworkanalysis.DirectandindirectpathwaysofeffectsarecharacterizedusingnetworkdiagramsforthefishcommunityRSC(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.3-2)andforallotherWaterandLandRSCs.However,aspreviouslymentioned,indirecteffectsarenothighlightedintheRCEAbeyondaquickmentioninthenetworkdiagramprovidedforeachWaterandLandRSC,andinsofarastheymaybeincidentallycapturedwithinthespatialscopeoftheROI.Forexample,withregardtotheeffectsofhydroelectricdevelopmentintheROIonfishquality:“…itshouldbenotedthathydroelectricdevelopmentcancausechangestofishdiet,waterquality,watertemperature,algae,andgrowthrates,allofwhichcan,inturn,affectthetasteandtextureoffish.ThesepotentialindirectlinkageshavenotbeensubjecttoscientificstudiesintheRCEAROI”(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.6-32). IntheassessmentofchangetotheROIduringthedevelopmentperiod,notenoughattentionisgiventotheeffectsoftransmissionlineconstruction,clearing,andvegetationmaintenanceenmasseintheROI,particularlyifnon-selectivevegetationclearingtechniquesarecommon(e.g.mowing).WhiletheintactnessanalysisinPartVILandconcludesthattheROIremainsreasonablyintact,theeffectsofasinglemajortransmissionright-of-way(suchastheBipoleIandIIcorridor,andtheBipoleIIIcorridor)canbeseriousandpersistenttolocalwildlifeifnotcarefullymitigated. Fromasocio-economiccontext,thenatureofeffectstriggeredbygenerationprojectsaredistinguishedfromthosefromtransmissionprojectsandfromconstructionphasetooperationphase,andalsovarybylocation.Forexample,PhaseIIPartIIIPeople(p.3.4-18)highlightsdriversofnegativechangeforhealthandwell-beingasfollows:
• potentialincreasedmercuryexposure;• potentialchangesinwaterquality;• changestopatternsoftraditionalfoodconsumptionandfoodsecurity,and• stressandanxietybroughtaboutbysocialchange.
TheRCEAconsistentlyreportschangesandtrendsovertimefortheRSCsexaminedinPartIIIPeople,PartIVPhysicalEnvironment,PartVWater,andPartVILand,providingbothquantitativeandqualitativedescriptions.However,thiseffortisoftensignificantlyconfoundedbythedatalimitationsmentionedearlier,includinglackofpre-developmentdata,lackofdatainthedevelopmentperiod,anddatathatareincongruentandnotabletobecompared.TheRCEAdoesevaluatechangetrendsovertimeforwaterqualityusingdataavailable.ThefundamentalquestionrelatedtowaterqualityintheRCEAwaswhetherwaterqualitychangedinsuchamannerthatitrendereditunsuitableforaquaticbiota(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.2-14).Spatial
| P a g e
45
comparisonsofwaterqualityacrosssiteswithintheROIwereundertaken,whereappropriate,toevaluatewhethertherewasevidenceofchangeinwaterqualityconditionsbetweenupstreamanddownstreamsitesonthesamesystem.Thesealsoallowedforanexaminationofpotentialcumulativechangesalongthelengthofariver,orreachofariversystem,andassistedwithidentificationofpotentialcausesofobservedchanges.Datacollectedatoff-systemwaterbodies(i.e.lakesorriversiteswherewaterlevelsandflowsareeitherentirelyorlargelyunaffectedbyManitobaHydro’shydraulicoperatingsystem)havealsobeenincludedtoprovidecontext(PhaseII,PartV,p.5-2-16).Aswell,statisticalanalyseswereundertakentoevaluatetemporaldifferencesinwaterqualitymetricsforsomelargerdatasets(PhaseII,PartV,p.5-2-17).Explorationofrelationshipsbetweenhydrologicmetrics,suchaswaterlevelanddischarge,andwaterqualitymetricswasundertakenforsomesitesanddatasetsusinglinearregressionanalysis(PhaseII,PartV,p.5-2-17).Thesub-sectiononErosionandSedimentationemployedanarrayofgoodpracticespatialanalyticaltechniques,includingLandsatAnalysisandAirPhotoAnalysis.IntheappendixesthataccompanythePhysicalEnvironmentalsection,theresultsofthetrendanalysisfortemperatureindicatesincreasingannual,winterandspringtemperaturetrends,thoughfewertrendsdetectedinsummerandautumn(Appendix4.2A,p.21).Appendix4.3AalsoprovidesanassessmentofhydraulicimpactsonLWRandtheCRDontheNelsonRiverusingastudyperiodfrom1914to2014andwiththeconclusionthat“LakeWinnipegRegulationhasreducedtherangeinwaterlevelsonLakeWinnipegbyreducingthepeakwaterlevelsduringfloodandraisingthelowestwaterlevelsduringdrought”(p.20).Theseareusefulconclusionsthatshouldbereplicatedforallcomponentsandindicatorsinordertohaveastrategicviewoftheaggregateimpacts.WenotedinconsistencyintheapproachtakentotheretrospectiveanalysiswhencomparingPartsIIIandIV(PeopleandPhysicalEnvironment)toPartsVandVI(WaterandLand).Whiletrend-basedanalysisisconsistentlyusedtocharacterizethecumulativeeffectsofhydroelectricdevelopmentsonWaterandLand,theinformation-provisionapproachthatisadoptedforthePeopleandPhysicalEnvironmentsectionsdoesnotallowforthesamekindoftrendanalysistobeperformed.Anovertfocusondescriptionofsocialconditionsandthephysicalsettingwithoutconsiderationtoquantifyingorqualifyingthemagnitudeandpathwaysofcombinedperturbations(hydroandotherdevelopments)onPeopleandPhysicalEnvironmentRSCsisaslipperyslopetowarddiminishingthesubstantivegoalsofaRCEA.Useofindicators,metrics,benchmarks,thresholdsTheRCEAconsistentlyusesindicators,metrics,andbenchmarkstoassessimpactstoPartVWaterandPartVILandRSCs.However,thisisnotevidentinPartIIIPeopleorPartIVPhysicalEnvironment.ScientificbenchmarksarealsoutilizedinPhaseIIPartVWaterandPartVILandtohelpcontextualizecumulativeimpactstoeachRSCandsuggestanappropriatelevelofconcernforthecumulativeimpactsdetected.Benchmarksaredescribedasstandardpointsofreferenceagainstwhichindicationofnegativechangecouldbedetected(PhaseII,PartI,p.1.3-19).Benchmarksweredefinedbasedon:
• thedegreeofchangethathasoccurredbetweenpre-andpost-hydroelectricdevelopment
| P a g e
46
conditions;• theManitobaWaterQualityStandards,ObjectivesandGuidelines;• theCanadianWaterQualityGuidelinesfortheProtectionofAquaticLife(PAL);• thefederalrecoverystrategyforborealwoodlandcaribouinCanada(EnvironmentCanada
2012);• whetheranRSC(e.g.moose)isincreasing,decreasing,orstable;• useofmodels/scientificliteraturetodeterminerelativeconditionforkeyparameters;• changesoutsidethelimitsofnaturalvariation;• howtheRSCcomparestoanRSCinanon-affectedwaterbodyinasimilargeographicarea;• whethertheRSCisabletocontinuetosupportFisheriesManagementObjectives(e.g.ableto
continuetosupportacommercialfishery);and• professionaljudgment.
ArangeofindicatorsandmetricsforeachRSCwasidentifiedandused.However,theproponentperformedselectionoffocalspecies,andindicatorsandmetricswithnoapparentpublicengagementorscrutiny[seeSections5.1.2.3.(Water)and6.1.2.3(Land)].Indicatorswereaimedatdescribingand/orcharacterizing,inameasurableway,thestateofthatRSC.Selectioncriteriaforthevariousindictorsarespecifiedas:
• DoestheindicatorassistindeterminingthehealthorconditionoftheRSC;• Istheindicatormeasurable;• Istheresufficientinformationavailableontheindicatortomakeitusefulindeterminingthe
conditionoftheRSC;and• Istheindicatoreasytounderstandandmeaningfultothegeneralpublic(PhaseII,PartI,p.
1.3-18). TheRCEAidentifiesdriverandresponseindicatorstofacilitateaclearerpictureoftheoverallhealthofeachRSCinPartIVPhysicalEnvironment,PartVWaterandPartVILand.Inourviewthisisauseful,innovativepractice.Ingeneral,saveforafewinstances,theuseofenvironmentalthresholdsthatcouldhelpassessthesignificanceofhistoricalimpactsonRSCsisavoidedintheRCEA.InPartVWaterandPartVILand,theshorttimelineoftheRSEAwasoftencitedasthereasonthresholdscouldnotbedeveloped.ThereasoncitedinPartIIIPeopleis“lackofsocio-economicanddemographic-specificdatapre-1980s”(PhaseII,PartIII,p.3.3-33),andinPartIVPhysicalEnvironmentitis“absenceofhigh-quality,long-termrecordswithgoodspatialcoverage”(PhaseII,PartIV,p.4.2-5).UseofthresholdsisacceptedasgoodpracticeinCEA.ConsiderationofimpactsignificanceItisacknowledgedthatmultiplehydroelectricdevelopmentshaveresultedincumulativeeffects,suchas:
• additiveeffects(e.g.multiplegeneratingstationsaffectingseveralareasofspawninghabitat
| P a g e
47
forafishspecies);• synergistic(e.g.theinputoftwocontaminantsthatcombinetomakeamoretoxic
substance);and• subtractive(e.g.theWuskwatimGenerationProjecthasreducedwaterlevelfluctuationson
WuskwatimLakethatwerecausedbytheChurchillRiverDiversion)(PhaseII,PartV.,p.5.1-10).
Itisalsoacknowledgedthattherehavebeenbothdirectandindirecteffectsfromhydroelectricdevelopment.“Insomecases,thepathwaysleadtotheeffectsdirectly(e.g.thephysicalpresenceoftheLimestoneGeneratingStationblockedupstreamfishmovements),andinothercases,thepathwaysleadtotheeffectsindirectly(e.g.dailywaterlevelfluctuationsdecreaseshabitatquality/availabilityinthelittoralzone;decreasedlittoralhabitatqualityreducesbenthicinvertebrateproduction;reducedbenthicinvertebrateproductionaffectsfishdependentonthisfoodsource;anddecreasedfishpopulationsleadtoreducedharvestsbyfishers)(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.1-10).Pathwaysofeffectsdiagramsforhydroelectricdevelopmentandinteractionswithotherprojectsandactivitiesisprovided(SeeFigure5.1.2-1inPhaseII,PartV–alreadymentionedabove).Linkagediagramsshowingpotentialpathwaysofeffectofhydroelectricandotherfactorsonwaterquality,andfishcommunityareprovided(SeeFigure5.2.1-1;5.3.1-1inPhaseII,PartV).Thedominantfocusonthedirect,additiveeffectsofhydroelectricdevelopmentoneachenvironmentalcomponentis,however,oneoftheweaknessesoftheRCEA.Oftenmissingistheassessmentofimpactstoimportantconnectionsbetweenoramongpeople,thephysicalenvironment,water,andland.Arguably,asynergisticapproachlinkingmultiplestressorstoeachcomponentinbothquantitativeandqualitativetermsismorelikelytoyieldusefulperspectiveforansweringquestionsabouttotalimpactsofdevelopmentsonthesocialandbiophysicalenvironment.Interestingly,itisnotedinthestudylimitations(PhaseII,Part1,p.1.3-20)that:
Theabilitytoquantifytheeffectofhydroelectricdevelopmentsmaybemaskedbytheeffectsofotherprojectsandactivities(e.g.thelossoflandduetoclearingforhydroelectricdevelopmentsinanareawithlargescaleforestryoperations),and
Dependingonthedatasources,whileitmaybepossibletoquantifythecumulativeeffectsofalldevelopmentsovertheperiodonanRSC,itmayormaynotbepossibletoseparateouttheproportionofthoseeffectsresultingspecificallyfromhydroelectricdevelopment(e.g.thechangeinapopulationofanimals).
InPhaseII,PartV,p.5.1-2,itisalsostated:“Whilethechangesinaquaticbiotaarestronglylinkedtochangesinthephysicalenvironment,theyarealsolinkedtosocio-economicconditions(e.g.changesinfishpricescanresultinthetargetingofspecificspeciesbycommercialfishers).
However,thesestatementswhichexplicitlyrecognizepotentialsforsynergisticinteractionsarenot
| P a g e
48
revisited.Withoutsufficientanddeliberateeffortatcharacterizingthesynergisticimpactsofnaturalandhumanperturbations(includinghydro)oneachVEC,atrueunderstandingofcumulativeeffectscannotbeachieved.Synergistically,anobviousconnectionbetweenwaterqualityandeffectsonthefishcommunityaremadeinanetworkanalysis(seeFigure5.3.1-1)butthislinkageisnotexploredindepthinthesummaryofcumulativeeffectsonfishcommunityintheROI.Further,itisimportanttoidentifywheresynergisticinteractionsaffectingLandandWaterRSCsmightalsoaffectPeopleRSCs.Forexample,withrespecttomercuryconcentrationsinfish:
BasedontheentiredatasetfortheROI,meanmercuryconcentrationsofpiscivorousfishspeciesfromon-systemwaterbodieshaveregularlyandoftensubstantiallyexceededthe0.5ppmHealthCanadastandardforthecommercialsaleoffish.Theseexceedenceshavetypicallybeenobservedfor5-25yearsbutinsomecasesformorethan35yearsafterflooding(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.5-98.
Itisalsonotedthat:
HydroelectricdevelopmentconsiderablychangedLowerChurchillshorelineecosystemsasindicatedbysurfacewaterarea,shorelinelength,waterbodymorphology,waterandiceregimes,bankandbeachattributes,thedistributionandabundanceofshorezone,offshoreandtallshrubvegetationandlargewoodydebrisaccumulation(PhaseII,PartVI,p.3-431).
Thesame“high”cumulativeeffectsarenotedforNelsonRivershorelineecosystems(PhaseII,PartVI,p.6.3-442,p.6.3-451,p.6.3-452).Fromacumulativeeffectsperspective,itseemsimportanttoexplorehowhighmercuryconcentrationsinpiscivorousfishandthemajoralterationofshorelineecosystemsofcombinedwithdecreasedfishquality(accordingtoIndigenouspeople)anddecreasedavailabilityoffishpercubicmeterintheNelsonandChurchillRiverestuaries,togetherhavesynergisticallyimpactedfoodsecurityandculturalintactnessforIndigenouscommunitiesintheROI.TheRCEAdoesmakeacoupleofattemptstoidentifysynergisticimpacts,andtheeffortshouldbeexpanded.AttimesinPartVWater,andPartVILand,thecumulativeimpactofhydrodevelopmentonanRSCisqualifiedrelativetotheimpactattributabletootherdevelopments,anddeemedproportionatelyless:thisiswrong-headed,asitisthetotalimpactofallactivitiesonaRSCthatisimportant.Inotherwords,theincrementalimpactsofhydroelectricdevelopmentare‘traded-off’(i.e.minimized)againstthesignificanceofotherdisturbancesintheregion;anerrorthatwasnotedinboththeBipoleIIIandKeeyaskCEAreviews.Forexample,waterqualityintheROIisconsideredtobesuitableforaquaticlifeformostsitesandperiods,withthemostnotableexceptionsbeinglowoxygenconcentrationsatsomelocations(e.g.NotigiLake),ironandaluminumlevelsabovePAL(protectionofaquaticlife)guidelines,andphosphorouscommonlyexceedingthenutrientguideline(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.2-210).Thesefindingsaredownplayedor‘minimized’throughcomparison:“theseconditionsarealsoobservedinlakesthatarenotaffectedbyhydroelectricdevelopment”(PhaseII,
| P a g e
49
PartV,p.5.2-210),and:
Theexistenceofmultiplepathways[ofeffectsonbeluga]makesdistinguishinghydroelectric-relatedeffectsfromotherdriversadifficulttask.Forexample,commercialexploitationofbelugaintheRCEAROIbeganinthelate1600s…Additionally,thePortofChurchill…undergoesregularunderwatermaintenanceactivities…(PhaseII,PartV,p.5.8-6).
Similarly,withrespecttocaribou:“…thehighestlevelsofhydroelectricdevelopmentdisturbanceoccur[s]intheWabowdenRange,with6%ofthetotalareadisturbanceattributedtohydroelectricdevelopment.However,thelargestcontributortodisturbanceinallrangesremainsnaturaldisturbance…”(PhaseII,PartVI,p.6.9-57).Andwithrespecttomoose:“Hydroelectricdevelopmenthascontributedtothemajorityoflandscapealteration,thoughthisquantityofhabitatlossissmall(approximately1%)relativetothehistoriccontributionofforestfires”(PhaseII,PartVI,p.6-10-208).ItistotalimpactonRSCsthatmattersandisneededtounderstandthesignificanceoffurtherimpactscausedbyanyadditionalprojectsintheROI.ItisapparentintheRCEAthatthetotalstressoncertainsub-regionsoftheROIismuchgreaterthanothers(thesub-region“Area2”–theNelsonRiverandestuary–beingthemoststressed),yettheRCEAdoesnotattempttoqualifythetotal,cumulativestressplacedonanygivensub-region,norontheROIasawhole.Inotherwords,despitethevolumeofinformationprovided,ManitobaandManitobaHydrodonotintegratetheirobservationstoarriveatastatementabouttheoverallwellbeingand/orsustainabilityoftheenvironmentorcommunitiesoftheregion.Infact,theRCEAavoidstheissueofthesignificanceofimpactsaltogether.ScientificbenchmarksareconsistentlyusedtogaugetheseriousnessofnotedcumulativeeffectstoRSCsinPartVWaterandPartVILand,butthereisnoattempttoevaluatesignificanceeitherusingtheclassiccriteria(magnitude,duration,likelihood)orbyapplyinga‘sustainabilitytest.’Further,thesocietalsignificanceofthecumulativeeffectsthroughouttheRCEAisnotaddressed.AssigningsignificancetotheimpactscausedbyhydropowerdevelopmentinnorthernManitobaisnotmerelyascientificexercise.Significancedeterminationisdynamic,contextual,political,andultimatelyajudgmentcall:scientistsevaluatesignificancedifferentlyfromoneanotherandfromlocalcommunities57.Ifathresholdhasbeendeemedcrossed,anyfutureimpactonaRSCmustbeconsideredsignificant.ProspectiveAnalysisTheRCEAdoesnotincludeprospectiveanalysis:
…environmentaltrendsarediscussed,whereappropriate,tounderstandandprovidecontextforenvironmentalchangeovertime,butpredictionsoffutureconditionsduetoclimatechange,introductionofnon-nativespecies,andotherongoinganthropogeniceffectsarelimited,astheyarenew,evolvingandcurrentlynotavailableintheliterature”(PhaseII,PartI,pg.1.3-5).
57Noble2015
| P a g e
50
Unfortunately,prospectiveanalysisisacoreelementofgoodpracticeCEAandthelackofitmustbeconsideredamajorshortcomingoftheRCEA.ItisunclearwhytheTermsofReferenceprecludedprospectiveanalysisgiventhatamajorquestionregardingthefuturewelfareoftheenvironmentandcommunitiesnorthernManitobaisthepotentialformoredams;particularly,whetherornottosanctiondevelopmentoftheConawapageneratingstation.Manitobahassignificantundevelopedhydropotentialremaininginthenorthandhasalreadyinvestedapproximately$380millionontheConawapaproject(ManitobaHydro2017). ManagementOneofthebiggestopportunitiesinaregionalscaleassessmentistoidentifyopportunitiesandpartnershipsforcoordinatedmitigationandmanagementofregionalimpacts.TheRCEAdoesnotaddressthemanagementphaseofCEAbeyondprovidingalistofpastandcurrentremediationandcompensationprogramsintheregion.
Whereapplicable,theassessmentincludesadiscussionofmitigationandremedialworksthathavebeenputinplacetoreduceeffectsandcompensationprovidesforeffectsthatcouldnotbemitigated(PhaseII,PartI,pg.1.2-6).
PhaseII,PartIIIPeopledocumentspast/ongoingeffortsbyManitobaHydroatmitigatingeffectsduetohydroelectricdevelopmentintheROI,someofwhicharecollaborativeinnaturee.g.LakeSturgeonStewardshipandEnhancementProgram(p.3.4-26)andCoordinatedAquaticMonitoringProgram(p.3.4-26).Mostoftheeffects(ResourceUse,Navigation,TransportationandPublicSafetyetc.)aremitigatedviaexistingSettlementAgreementsthatstipulatecompensationarrangementsand/oragreementsforaddressinghydroelectricdevelopmentimpacts.Otherlocation-specificinitiatives(e.g.KischiSipiNamao,formallyLowerNelsonRiverSturgeonStewardshipAgreement)andprograms(e.g.WaterwaysManagementProgram,includingBoatPatrolProgram,DebrisManagementProgram,SafeIceTrailsProgram,andWaterLevelForecastNoticeProgram)aredocumentedas“mitigationmeasures”forNavigation,TransportationandPublicSafety.TheseeffortsarelargelypresentedinthecontextofhydrodevelopmentandnotinthecontextofoffsettingsignificantcumulativeeffectsaffectingthepeopleintheROI. PartIVPhysicalEnvironmentissilentonthetopicofimpactmitigationandmanagementmeasures,althoughitalludestothevalueofcollaborativemonitoringwithoutelaboratingontheapplicationofsuchcollaborativeeffortsoncumulativeeffectsmanagement.Forexample,thesectionstates:WaterSurveyofCanada(WSC)andManitobaHydroarepartoftheNationalHydrometricProgram—acooperativeendeavourbetweenthefederal,provincial,andterritorialgovernmentstoprovideaccurate,timely,andstandardizeddataandinformationonthecurrentandhistoricavailabilityofsurfacewater(4.3-5).Thereasonadvancedforthiscollaborativeinitiativeistosupportoperationalandcostefficienciesandnotforthepurposeofoffsettingsignificantcumulativeenvironmentaleffects.Thus,althoughthelistofpastremediationandcompensationprogramsprovideddoesserveasa
| P a g e
51
usefulbasistoidentifystrengths,weaknesses,gaps,andopportunitiestostrengthenregionalimpactmanagement,thisworkhasyettobedone.
FollowingcompletionofthePhaseIIreportandthepublicoutreachprogram,ManitobaandManitobaHydrowillreviewalloftheRCEAdocuments,theoutcomesofthepublicoutreachprogram,aswellascurrentmonitoringandplanning/licensinginitiativesandconsidernextappropriatesteps.Effortswillbemadetodevelopnextstepsinacomprehensiveandcoordinatedfashion.NextstepswillbeoutlinesinafinalRCEANextStepsdocument,availableinspring2017”(PhaseII,PartI,pg.1.1-2).
Atthetimeofthisreview,theNextStepsdocumentwasnotcompleted.
| P a g e
52
REFERENCESAlbertaEnvironmentn.d.CumulativeEffectsAssessmentinEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentReportsRequiredundertheAlbertaEnvironmentalProtectionandEnhancementAct.http://aep.alberta.ca/land/land-industrial/programs-and-services/environmental-assessment/documents/CumulativeEffectsEIAReportsUnderEPEA-A.pdf
BaxterW,RossW,SpalingH2001.ImprovingthepracticeofcumulativeeffectsassessmentinCanada.ImpactAssessmentandProjectAppraisal19(4):253-262.
BeanlandsG,DuinkerP1983.AnEcologicalFrameworkforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentinCanada.InstituteforResourceandEnvironmentalStudies,Halifax,NSandFederalEnvironmentalAssessmentReviewOffice,Hull,Quebec.
BeaufortSeaStrategicRegionalPlanofAction2008.http://www.bsstrpa.ca/pdf/bsstrpa/BSStRPA%20RPA%20March2009.pdf
CanadianCouncilofMinistersoftheEnvironment2009.RegionalStrategicEnvironmentalAssessmentinCanada:PrinciplesandGuidance.PN1428.CanadianCouncilofMinistersoftheEnvironment,Winnipeg,MB.
CanadianCouncilofMinistersoftheEnvironment2014.Canada-wideDefinitionsandPrinciplesforCumulativeEffects.PN1541.CanadianCouncilofMinistersoftheEnvironment,Winnipeg,MB.
CanadianEnvironmentalAssessmentAgency2014.TechnicalGuidanceforAssessingCumulativeEnvironmentalEffectsundertheCanadianEnvironmentalAssessmentAct,2012.CatalogueNo.En106-116/1-2014E-PDF.https://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/Content/B/8/2/B82352FF-95F5-45F4-B7E2-B4ED27D809CB/Cumulative_Environmental_Effects-Technical_Guidance-Dec2014-eng.pdf
CanterL,RossB2010.Stateofpracticeofcumulativeeffectsassessmentandmanagement:thegood,thebadandtheugly.ImpactAssessmentandProjectAppraisal,28(4):261-268.
ChetkiewiczC,LintnerA2014.GettingitrightinOntario'sFarNorth:theneedforaregionalstrategicenvironmentalassessmentintheRingofFire[Wawangajing].WildlifeConservationSocietyCanada.https://www.wcscanada.org/Portals/96/Documents/RSEA_Report_WCSCanada_Ecojustice_FINAL.pdf
CleanEnvironmentCommission,Manitoba2004.ReportonPublicHearings:WuskwatimGenerationandTransmissionProject.WinnipegMB:ManitobaCleanEnvironmentCommission.http://www.cecmanitoba.ca/resource/reports/Commissioned-Reports-2004-2005-Wuskwatim_Generation_Transmission_Projects_Full_Report.pdf
CleanEnvironmentCommission,Manitoba2013.ReportonPublicHearingBipoleIIITransmissionProject.WinnipegMB:ManitobaCleanEnvironmentCommission.http://www.cecmanitoba.ca/resource/reports/FINAL%20WEB%20Bipole%20III%20Transmission%20Project_WEB1.pdf
CleanEnvironmentCommission,Manitoba2013.ReportonPublicHearingBipoleIIITransmissionProject.WinnipegMB:ManitobaCleanEnvironmentCommission.http://www.cecmanitoba.ca/resource/reports/FINAL%20WEB%20Bipole%20III%20Transmission%20Project_WEB1.pdf
CookeS,WeschS,DonaldsonL,WilsonA,HaddawayN2017.ACallforEvidence-BasedConservationandManagementofFisheriesandAquaticResources.Fisheries,42(3):143-149.
| P a g e
53
CooperL,SheateW2004.IntegratingcumulativeeffectsassessmentintoUKstrategicplanning:implicationsoftheEuropeanUnionSEADirective.ImpactAssessmentandProjectAppraisal,22(1):5–16.
Dalal-ClaytonB,SadlerB2005.StrategicEnvironmentalAssessment:ASourcebookandReferenceGuidetoInternationalExperience.InternationalInstituteforEnvironmentandDevelopment:London,England.
DaveyL,BarnesJ,HorvathC,GriffithsA2002.AddressingcumulativeeffectsIII:Sectoralandregionalenvironmentalassessment.In:CumulativeEffectsManagementToolsandApproaches,A.Kennedy(ed.).Edmonton,AB:SocietyofProfessionalBiologists.
DuinkerP,BurbidgeE,BoardleyS&GreigL2013.Scientificdimensionsofcumulativeeffectsassessment:towardimprovementsinguidanceforpractice.EnvironmentalReviews,21(1):40-52.
DuinkerP,GreigL2006.TheimpotenceofcumulativeeffectsassessmentinCanada:ailmentsandideasforredeployment.EnvironmentalManagement,37(2):153–61.
EuropeanCommission1999.GuidancefortheAssessmentofIndirectandCumulativeImpactsaswellasImpactInteractions.Luxembourg:OfficeforOfficialPublicationsoftheEuropeanCommunities.http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/eia/eia-studies-and-reports/pdf/guidel.pdf.
Fidler,CandNoble,B2013.AdvancingRegionalStrategicEnvironmentalAssessmentinCanada'sWesternArctic:ImplementationOpportunitiesandChallenges.JournalofEnvironmentalAssessmentPolicyandManagement,15(01),1350007.
ForestPracticesBoard2011.CumulativeEffects:FromAssessmentTowardsManagement:SpecialReport(FPB/SR/39).VictoriaBC:ForestPracticesBoard.http://www.dawsoncreek.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/SR39_Cumulative_Effects_From_Assessment_Towards_Management.pdf
GélinasJ,HorswillD,NortheyR,PelletierR2017.BuildingCommonGround:ANewVisionforImpactAssessmentinCanada.TheFinalReportoftheExpertPanelfortheReviewofEnvironmentalAssessmentProcesses.OttawaON:CanadianEnvironmentalAssessmentAgency.https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/themes/environment/conservation/environmental-reviews/building-common-ground/building-common-ground.pdf
GibsonR2013.Whysustainabilityassessment?In:BondA,Morrison-SaundersA,HowittR(eds.)SustainabilityAssessment:Pluralism,PracticeandProgress.London:Routledge,pp.3-17.
GovernmentofCanada2017.ReferenceGuide:AddressingCumulativeEnvironmentalEffects:TheConceptofCumulativeEnvironmentalEffects.https://www.canada.ca/en/environmental-assessment-agency/services/policy-guidance/reference-guide-addressing-cumulative-environmental-effects-concept-cumulative-environmental-effects.html.
GreatSandHillsScientificAdvisoryCommittee2007.GreatSandHillsRegionalEnvironmentalStudy.CanadianPlainsResearchCentre,Regina,SK.
GunnJandNobleB2011.ConceptualandMethodologicalChallengestoIntegratingSEAandCumulativeEffectsAssessment.EnvironmentalImpactAssessmentReview31:154-160.
GunnJ,NobleB2009.Aconceptualbasisandmethodologicalframeworkforregionalstrategicenvironmentalassessment(R-SEA).ImpactAssessmentandProjectAppraisal27(4):258-270.
GunnJ,NobleB2013.ReviewoftheCumulativeEffectsAssessmentundertakenbyManitobaHydro
| P a g e
54
fortheBipoleIIIProject.WinnipegMB:PublicInterestLawCentre.https://sitecstatement.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/gunn-j-and-b-noble-november-2012-critical-review-of-the-cumulative-effects-assessment-undertaken-by-manitoba-hydro-for-the-bipole-iii-project-prepared-for-the-public-interest-law-c1.pdf
GunnJ,NobleB2015.Sustainabilityconsiderationsinregionalenvironmentalassessment.SustainabilityAssessmentHandbook.Cheltenham:EdwardElgar,pp.79-102.
HarrimanJ2000.TowardaConceptualFrameworkforIntegratedResourceManagementonElectricUtilityTransmissionRights-of-Way.PrinceGeorge:UniversityofNorthernBritishColumbia,312pp.(MScThesis)
HarrimanJ,Noble,B.2008.CharacterizingprojectandstrategicapproachestoregionalcumulativeeffectsassessmentinCanada.JournalofEnvironmentalAssessmentPolicyandManagement,10(01),25-50.
HegmannG,CocklinC,CreaseyR,DupuisS,KennedyA,KingsleyL,RossW,SpalingH,StalkerD1999.CumulativeEffectsAssessmentPractitioner’sGuide.MinisterofPublicWorksandGovernmentServicesCanada.
HorvathC,BarnesJ2004.ApplyingaRegionalStrategicEnvironmentalAssessmentApproachtotheManagementofOffshoreOilandGasDevelopment.Paperpresentedatthe24thAnnualConferenceoftheInternationalAssociationofImpactAssessment,Calgary.
HouleM,FortinD,DussaultC,CourtoisR,&Ouellet,J2010.Cumulativeeffectsofforestryonhabitatusebygraywolf(Canislupus)intheborealforest.Landscapeecology,25(3),419-433.
IndianandNorthernAffairsCanada2007.ACitizen’sGuidetoCumulativeEffects.OttawaON:IndianAffairsandNorthernDevelopment.https://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/DAM/DAM-INTER-NWT/STAGING/texte-text/ntr_pubs_CEG_1330635861338_eng.pdf
InternationalFinanceCorporation2013.GoodPracticeNote:CumulativeImpactAssessmentandManagement—GuidanceforthePrivateSectorinEmergingMarkets.Washington:InternationalFinanceCorporation(WorldBankGroup).https://www.scribd.com/document/294091345/IFC-Good-Practice-Note-Cumulative-Impacts
JohnsonD,LalondeK,McEachernM,KenneyJ,MendozaG,BuffinA,RichK2011.ImprovingcumulativeeffectsassessmentinAlberta:Regionalstrategicassessment.EnvironmentalImpactAssessmentReview,31:481–483.
KennettS2002.LessonsfromCheviot:Redefininggovernment'sroleincumulativeeffectsassessment.In:CumulativeEffectsAssessmentinCanada:FromConcepttoPractice,A.Kennedy(ed.),Calgary,AB:AlbertaSocietyofProfessionalBiologists.
KirchhoffD,McCarthyD,CrandallD,McDowellL,WhitelawG2010.Apolicywindowopens:strategicenvironmentalassessmentinYorkRegion,Ontario,Canada.JournalofEnvironmentalAssessmentPolicyandManagement,12(3):333-354.
KirchhoffD,McCarthyD,CrandallD,McDowellL,WhitelawG2011.Strategicenvironmentalassessmentandregionalinfrastructureplanning:thecaseofYorkRegion,Ontario,Canada.ImpactAssessmentandProjectAppraisal,29(1):11-26.
KnowHistory2016.HydroelectricDevelopmentinNorthernManitoba:AHistoryoftheDevelopmentoftheChurchill,BurntwoodandNelsonRivers,1960–2015.Winnipeg,MB:ManitobaCleanEnvironmentCommission.http://www.cecmanitoba.ca/resource/hearings/42/Hydroelectric%20Development%20in%20Nort
| P a g e
55
hern%20Manitoba.pdfLeungW,NobleB,JaegerJ&GunnJ2016.Disparateperceptionsaboutuncertaintyconsiderationanddisclosurepracticesinenvironmentalassessmentandopportunitiesforimprovement.EnvironmentalImpactAssessmentReview,57,89-100.
ManitobaHydro2017.2017/18and2018/19GeneralrateApplication,tab3,pg.18:https://www.hydro.mb.ca/regulatory_affairs/pdf/electric/general_rate_application_2017/full_rate_application_2017.pdf
MarmorekD,BerryT,BunnelP,BernardD,KurzW,MurrayC,...&SullyL1992.TowardsanecosystemapproachinBritishColumbia:Resultsofawork-shoponecosystemgoalsobjectives,December7to9,1992.PreparedbyESALtd.,VancourverBCforEnvironmentCanada,BritishColumbiaMinistryofEnvironment,LandsandParks,andBritishColumbiaofForests.FraserRiverActionPlan,193-16.
MulvihillP,BakerD2001.Ambitiousandrestrictivescoping:CasestudiesfromNorthernCanada.EnvironmentalImpactAssessmentReview,21(4):363–384.
NationalScienceFoundation2000.AssessmentofthePossibleCumulativeEnvironmentalImpactsofCommercialShip-BasedTourismintheAntarcticPeninsulaArea.ProceedingsofaWorkshopHeldinLaJolla,California,7–9June2000.https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02201/nsf02201.pdf
NobleB2010.Cumulativeenvironmentaleffectsandthetyrannyofsmalldecisions:Towardsmeaningfulcumulativeeffectsassessmentandmanagement.NaturalResourcesandEnvironmentalStudiesInstituteOccasionalPaperNo.8.UniversityofNorthernBritishColumbia,PrinceGeorge,BC.
NobleB2015.IntroductiontoEnvironmentalImpactAssessment:GuidetoPrinciplesandPractice,3rdedition.Toronto:OxfordUniversityPress.
NobleB,GunnJ2013.ReviewofKHLP’sApproachtotheKeeyaskGenerationProjectCumulativeEffectsAssessment.WinnipegMB:PublicInterestLawCentre.http://www.cecmanitoba.ca/resource/hearings/39/CAC-010%20Cumulative%20Effects%20Assessment,%20Noble%20&%20Gunn.pdf
NobleB,GunnJ2016.Strategicenvironmentalassessment.InKHanna(Ed.)EnvironmentalAssessment:PracticeandParticipation.Toronto:OxfordUniversityPress,pp96-121.
OlagunjuA2012.SelectingvaluedecosystemcomponentsforcumulativeeffectsinfederallyassessedroadinfrastructureprojectsinCanada(Mastersdissertation).
OlagunjuA,GunnJ2013.WhatInfluencesValuedEcosystemComponentSelectionforCumulativeEffectsInImpactAssessment?JournalofEnvironmentalAssessmentPolicyandManagement,15(04):1350022.
RootsF1986.Closingremarks:acurrentassessmentofcumulativeassessment.In:CumulativeEnvironmentalEffects:ABinationalPerspective,G.Beanlands,etal.(eds.)TheCanadianEnvironmentalAssessmentResearchCouncilandtheUnitedStatesNationalResearchCouncil,Canada:MinisterofSupplyandServices.
RossW1998.Cumulativeeffectsassessment:learningfromCanadiancasestudies.ImpactAssessmentandProjectAppraisal,16(4):267-276.
TongeM,PulferT2011.RecoveryStrategyforPolarBear(Ursusmaritimus)inOntario.OntarioRecoveryStrategySeries.PreparedfortheOntarioMinistryofNaturalResources,Peterborough,Ontario.http://files.ontario.ca/environment-and-energy/species-at-risk/stdprod_086036.pdf
| P a g e
56
TreweekJ1999.EcologicalAssessment.Oxford:BlackwellScience.TrombulakS,FrissellC2000.Reviewofecologicaleffectsofroadsonterrestrialandaquaticcommunities.ConservationBiology,14:18-30.
UnitedStatesCouncilonEnvironmentalQuality1996.EnvironmentalQualityAlongtheAmericanRiver:The1996ReportoftheCouncilonEnvironmentalQualityPart1TheNationalEnvironmentalPolicyAct.UnitedStatesWhiteHouse:Washington,D.C.Online:https://ceq.doe.gov/nepa/reports/1996/part1.pdf
WaldramJ1984.Hydro-electricdevelopmentandtheprocessofnegotiationinNorthernManitoba,1960-1977.TheCanadianJournalofNativeStudies,4(2):205-239.
Weddell,B2002.ConservingLivingNaturalResources:IntheContextofaChangingWorld.CambridgeUniversityPress:UK.