Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Risks due to EMIon Airports
Dr. rer.nat. Christian FeltenBGF(Institution for statutory accident insurance and prevention in thevehicle operating trades)
Hamburg, Germany
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 2
Overview:
Frequencies & Wavelengths
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 3
Frequencies of Airport-Equipment
♦ RADAR e.g. 2,8 GHz (HF)
♦ Mobile phone 900 MHz (HF), D-Net
♦ Radio transmitter e.g. 160, 480 MHz (HF)
♦ Office-equipment 50 Hz (LF)
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 4
Physical Units & Dimensions
Variable Sign Unit induced by
Electric field strength E [V/m] voltage
Example: capacitor
Magnetic field intensity H [A/m] current
Example: magnetic coil
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 5
Electromagnetic induction B Tesla [T = Vs/m²]
B = µ • H
Magnetic permeability µ Henry/m [H/m]
in air: µ = 1.257 H/m
Physical Units & Dimensions
Electric current causes amagnetic field. The effect ofthe field on media is calledelectromagnetic induction.
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 6
Electromagnetic Induction - Example (male)
0 µT 15-1500 µT
Electric razors high electromagnetic induction is caused bya) electric motor and b) short distance to skin
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 7
... Example (female)
6-2000 µT (3 cm distance)
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 8
Typical Values - Low FrequencyLimiting value (50 Hz): 424 µT (BGV B11);
100 µT (26. BImSchV)Distance Magnetic induction
Monitor 3 cm 0,5-10 µTMonitor 30 cm 0,1-1,0 µTComputer 3 cm 0,5-3,0 µTComputer 30 cm <0,01 µTCoffee machine 3 cm 1,0-2,0 µTRefrigerator 3 cm 0,5-1,7 µTTable lamp 3 cm 0,1-0,2 µT
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 9
Physical Units & Dimensions
Power density, emittance S = E • H [W/m²]
Example: electrotherapy = max. 630 W/m²
applicability: instrument for electrotherapy (leimcke physiotherm®)
Effect on body:
Specific absorption rate SAR [W/kg] -Transfer of heat/energy; depends onstrength of emittance S and onphysical/electrical properties of recipient
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 10
Predominant FieldsConditions Example Pred. Fieldlow frequency (<30 kHz) high-voltage- electrichigh voltagevoltagevoltagevoltage power-linelow current
low frequency (<30 kHz) transformators, magneticlow voltage electric motors,high currentcurrentcurrentcurrent el. welding unit
high frequency (>30 kHz) radar, microwaves, electro-magneticradio (coupled)
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 11
Effects on People
Low FrequencyLow FrequencyLow FrequencyLow Frequency LF LF LF LF• Stimulus of muscle-,
nerve- and sense-cells(definite threshold)
• Hairvibration >5 kV/m• Scintillation of eyes
>5 mT (50 Hz)(magnetophosphenes)
HighHighHighHigh Frequency Frequency Frequency Frequency HF HF HF HF• Warming of the body
(possibly deep:avoidance of thereceptors of skin)critical: eyes, ankles,patella, testes andmetallic implants
•Influence on cardiac pacemakers
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 12
Effects on PeopleNon-Non-Non-Non-thermic effectsthermic effectsthermic effectsthermic effects of High of High of High of High Frequency Frequency Frequency Frequency
• Influence on brain-activities• Promotion of sleep, but suppression of
REM-phases by mobiles• Possibly audible pulses• Production of heat shock proteins in
nematodes by low level HF-radiationConclusion: even if many assumptions are
unproved: there are non-thermic effects,but we are not yet able to interpretethem in regard to human health
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 13
Effects on People
Yes?• Some (weak) hints
from epidemiology• Athermic effects
without interpretation
No?• No accumulated dose• No mechanism of
cancerogenesis known• If at all there are only
small case numbers
Cancerogenesis by HF-Radiation?
Conclusion:• A cancerogenesis by HF-radiation is not published• But we don´t know much about long-time exposure
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 14
Precautions:3-„D“-Canon for Radiation Protection
• 1. DDDDistance
• 2. DDDDuration of stay
• 3. DDDDegree of shielding
• The 4th „D“ for non-ionizingradiation:DDDDisconnect
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 15
Dependency on DDDDistanceMagnetic induction is subject to distance; quadratic dependency
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 16
Examples for Limiting ValuesRec. of ICNIRP, IRPA, SSK
High Frequency EmissionsFrequency (f) electric field strength magnetic field strength
(MHz) (V/m) (A/m)100: FM Radio 27,5 0,073900: Mobile (D-Net) 41,25 0,1112450: Microwave oven 61 0,16
Low Frequency EmissionsFrequency (f) electric field strength magnetic induction
(Hz) (kV/m) (µT)50: Home appliances 5 10016,67: Rail 10 300
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 17
Examples for Limiting Values → BGV B 11 (for workers)
High Frequency EmissionsFrequency (f) electric field strength magnetic field strength
(MHz) (V/m) (A/m)100: FM Radio 27,5/61,4* 0,073/0,163*900: Mobile (D-Net) 41,25/92,1* 0,109/0,244*2450: Microwave oven 61,5/137,3* 0,163/0,364*
Low Frequency EmissionsFrequency (f) electric field strength magnetic induction
(Hz) (kV/m) (µT)50: Home appliances 6,67/21,32* 424/1358*16,67: Rail 20/30* 1273/4073*
*Exposure area 2/1
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 18
Danger ZoneDanger ZoneDanger ZoneDanger Zone
Area of Area of Area of Area of higherhigherhigherhigher Exposure Exposure Exposure Exposure
Exposure - Area 1Exposure - Area 1Exposure - Area 1Exposure - Area 1
Exposure - Area 2Exposure - Area 2Exposure - Area 2Exposure - Area 2
2 hours
Danger Zone - only with protective equipment
Limiting Values „Area Concept“ in BGV B 11
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 19
Limiting ValuesBGV B11 - Electric Field
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 20
Limiting ValuesBGV B11 - Magnetic Field
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 21
Typical Values - Low FrequencyLimiting value (50 Hz): 424 µT (BGV B11);
100 µT (26. BImSchV)Distance Magnetic induction
Monitor 3 cm 0,5-10 µTMonitor 30 cm 0,1-1,0 µTComputer 3 cm 0,5-3,0 µTComputer 30 cm <0,01 µTCoffee machine 3 cm 1,0-2,0 µTRefrigerator 3 cm 0,5-1,7 µTTable lamp 3 cm 0,1-0,2 µT
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 22
Typical Values - High Frequency
Distance Power density Limiting valueBGV B11, Area2
FM-Radio-tower 1500 m <0,05 W/m² 2 W/m²Mobile ph. 900 MHz 3 cm <2 W/m² 4,5 W/m²Transmitter 900 MHz 50 m 0,001 W/m² 4,5 W/m²Office under transmitter 0,009 W/m² 4,5 W/m²Microwave-oven 5 cm 0,62 W/m² 10 W/m²Airport-Radar 100 m 0,1-10 W/m² 10 W/m²Traffic-Radar 30 cm 1-8 W/m² 10 W/m²
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 23
Standortbescheinigung („locationcertificate“) for RADAR-Set
Contains only a calculated value forsafesafesafesafe distance distance distance distance (no measurementresults!)
Example ASR- 2000-Radar:168 m in mainbeam direction
2,8 GHz → 61 V/mlimiting value • 32= 1952 V/m
Base: worst case calculation by
• limiting value 26. BImSchV forpulsed radiation (factor 32 [§2step2])
• peak capacity (power of the set)
• neglect of rotation(time)
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 24
Apron and ramp vehicles
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 25
What about EMI byradio transmitters?
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 26
Results of Own Measurements:Apron and Ramp Vehicles, Radio Transmitter
Antenna on top of the vehicles, 20 cm distance160 MHz max. 50 V/m, max. 160 mA/m418 MHz max. 32 V/m, max. 66 mA/m In the vehicle, door open160 MHz max. 7,5 V/m418 MHz max. 4,5 V/m
Charging station for radio transmitter - 1,5 µT (30 cm/50 Hz)
} ExposureArea 1
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 27
Exposure Area 1: what does it mean?
Not: implication of danger,particularly with regard to shortterm exposure
Required: safety instructionsand documentation (BGV B11)
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 28
→ ... has to be investigated!
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 29
What are Potential Radiation Hazards?
• Stay close to RADAR: normally improbable close enough to airport-RADAR, but possibly close enough to aircraft-RADAR during maintenance/testing („passive“ exposure)• Maintenance of RADAR („active“ exposure of stuff)• People with metallic implants or cardiac pacemakers (possible interferences by LF or HF already in exposure area 2)? Not really known effects of long-term use of mobiles or radio sets
BGF plans to determine safedistance throughmeasurements this year
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 30
RADAR and Cancer by X-Ray?Risk of cancerogenesis by EMI is notnotnotnot documentated!
Imaginable (only under special circumstances) is acancerogenesis due to Ionizing Radiation (X-ray)from a HF-generator (tubes)
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 31
X-Ray Doses
Worst case example: Klystron-tube 101 kV→ On the surface of the tube: ca. 40 µSv/h→ In working position (maintenance): max 1,1 µSv/h
Exposure about 360 h/a leads to 396 µSv/a annual dose
Reference values:
New german radiation protection ordinance: 1000 µSv/a
Average natural background radiation in Germany: 2500 µSv/a
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 32
Units & Dimensions
Absorbed dose D [Gy] Equivalent dose H [Sv] D • Q = H Radiation weighting factor Q
Equivalent dose rate [Sv/h]
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 33
Source of Ionizing Radiation:Airport X-ray for Luggage-Inspection
LuggageLuggageLuggageLuggage----inspection systems ofinspection systems ofinspection systems ofinspection systems of Düsseldorf International Airport Düsseldorf International Airport Düsseldorf International Airport Düsseldorf International Airport
5 cm distance from surface (allaround): < 0,1 µSv/h
Exemplary measurement of theinside dose in „HeimannHi-Scan“ Systems: 0,5 - 2,1 µSv
(Measurement by TÜV and a privatecompany)
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 34
Laser-Scanners for Luggage-IdentificationNon-Ionizing Radiation:
Even Lasers of category 2 (BGV B2) mightinjure the eyes!
There is no sufficient protection by the reflexof the eyelid!
The first protection is prevention of exposure(no possiblity of looking straight into thebeam),instruction of employees and- if necessary - special laser safety goggles
A measurement is projected
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 35
Conclusions• Strong dependence on frequencies: limit values,
protection measures and ev. biological effects• Radiation protection is essential in case of
maintenance of RADAR and if people use cardiacpacemakers
• The ubiquitary exposure don‘t lead to danger:Normally fear induces illness, not the radiation!
• Some questions still have to be clarified:♦ long term effects of mobile radiation?♦ safety margin to aircraft RADAR?♦ danger by laser-scanners?
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 36
Thanks to
U. Metzdorf(while repairing laboratory devices)
E. Willer(while sampling dust probes)
Dr. Felten / BGF Hamburg 37
Conclusion (2)
„Too much radar“ may be harmfulunder several circumstances ...
... but insufficient radar may be, aswell!